This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
which will eventually come about or be realized as "stupid" like "ignorant" is not an excuse under our law: This court cannot DISMISS or render MOOT what is inalienable and so has been granted to We, the People thus I by the Creator and then The Founders as they placed it in writing. It always was, always is and always will be mine as long as I do not allow judges who seem to be on the same side as the criminals to steal it from me. Knowledge you need to process and own to then reconsider your own case not mine IF you wish to escape the penalty of death exactly named for the crime known as treason within our Constitution: 1. I am seeking to restore original jurisdiction and my case is good of and by itself if you consider only the PERSONAL injury to my person. If the fact and law known as my life and the Constitution do not move you to act you then have become my proof and will be making an appearance in SCOTUS, hopefully in person so you can give 1st person testimony as to why you refused to execute your sworn duties and refused to obey, uphold and enforce the Constitution in my case and then in the case of We, the People. Did you too commit perjury when you swore out that oath? Original jurisdiction is not solely the right of a court to hear the case; I let you believe that as citing only historical fact and US case law failed in the past; it seemed as if the Federal bench was predetermined to NEVER hear the case for women and The People no matter how many of us are injured and even die. It seemed as if the federal bench was out to protect law licenses, dead institutions, at all costs even if it meant their own lives. It seemed as if the federal judiciary was now worshipping those licenses and titles and their own in violation of the law orders like people of yore worshipped graven images and did not know or respect anything constitutional, as if they did not even know what our Constitution is or says. I will make another attempt but I warn you: you will feel insulted and will have all manner of ‘bad’ emotions surface as you read this as that is what a human must go through and then get past to remove him or her self from denial. John Roberts and I did this; if you are truly equally created and so duly processed, then you then too can and will do it. Those emotions? Some will be true and some will be false; this is how you correctly set your internal, emotional compass to match the Declaration as only you know your truth. The crux of the case is: Can this litigant make this case on a personal or absolute level? Does she meet pure and absolute standing to then make it upon the whole? As we all know the law is, for a fact, overthrown as Bush sat and now Obama sits and we know US history as we lived it what I needed to then inform you of is not US case law or that history but my own personal facts or my history, my life story! Several people can make this case upon the whole but no other person meets the required purest standing that is EVERY SINGLE ENUMERATED RIGHT MUST HAVE BEEN VIOLATED OR THE LITIGANT DOES NOT HAVE STANDING. So then: original jurisdiction is also the right of The People to FIRE the trustees of the corporation for violating the trust. Need to fire the corporate officers of the US? Then the shortest distance between two points is a straight line so walk a straight path: Go directly to SCOTUS. It is our inalienable right to dissolve you and abolish you as the form is an idea in your head that you act upon thus making it real. Those unconstitutional ideas, policies, beliefs and rules you possess are tuned into court orders. This unconstitutionality would be exactly worded and is a math problem as outlined in the following, American history and my original thought but taken from a website and a group of lawyers calling themselves TeamLaw as we have been working on this simultaneously so I discovered them after I made my case as I knew you would underestimate me as that is the fatal mistake all traitors make thus I sought out people who could and would support my case and my application of the law in light of the actual not made up or wholly denied historical facts. The Declaration? Fact and law. The Constitution? Fact and law. Marbury v Madison? Fact and law. The SCOTUS action known as 11/20/08? Fact and law, it’s all fact and law and so is history as Roberts action proves me to be me the living embodiment of the law in both letter or President and in spirit or Commander as Roberts could not act unless I informed him first thus we know the paper, my emergency application and The Constitution does exist and that he read it, weighed it and upheld it:
“Historical Review: In 1993 we discovered the original jurisdiction State Governors’ seats were vacant. I (Eric William Madsen) ran for office in Colorado; and in 1994, I was elected Governor by Colorado’s Electors. I lawfully accepted the election and was seated in the original jurisdiction Governor’s seat. At that same time, Roy Romer was elected as Governor of the more commonly recognized private corporation known as, “The State of Colorado” (Corp. State). The Corp. State courts then started to subpoena me to come and testify as the Governor of the original jurisdiction Republic State. I responded to most those subpoenas and so testified. After finding it next to impossible to beat us in court, the Corp. State’s sub-corporation, Arapaho County, determined that if they could get funding from the United States Congress they could possibly beat us. On review, Congress sent the matter to the National Security Council who handed the matter over to the Military’s Joint Chiefs for review. About two weeks later, the Chief of the Joint Chiefs
responded, “What Governor Madsen is doing out their in Colorado is legal, lawful and correct; and, if they accomplish what they have set out to do we will recognize that President of The United States of America as the President of The United States of America, Commander in Chief of the military and give them full military support.” Though the National Security Council is purely an advisory committee, having no legislative or judicial effect; the fact remains, they recognized the truth and responded with it to Congress who sent the supplicants away without funding; after that, the Corp. State started to leave us alone. The Corp. State and its courts, the United States 10th District Court, the United States Congress, the United States National Security Council and the Joint Chiefs of the United States of America’s military all recognized, reviewed and accepted my election as the original jurisdiction Governor of Colorado. After serving as Colorado’s original jurisdiction Governor for four years, I was lawfully appointed to The United States of America’s original jurisdiction Senate, so I retired from the Governor’s Office having served a full term. The next original jurisdiction Governor of Colorado, Robert Shell, followed me into Office and confirmed my appointment to the original jurisdiction Senate. From around the country, 41 other Governors have since been elected in their respective offices. Other Senators were seated as I was and I was elected by them as the original jurisdiction Senate’s President pro tempore, where I still serve. An original jurisdiction Republic State Governor, can appoint and seat that State’s original jurisdiction National Senators, who can in turn elect and seat an original jurisdiction President of the United States of America, which has not been done since 1913. Until I was elected, the States had not had Governors seated since at least 1968. The main reason you see the problems our nation faces today is the people have forgotten what our actual government is and they instead act as if these private foreign controlled corporations (Corp. U.S. and the Corp. States) are their government. It’s why the States are not using our national money system. It’s why we are caught up in wars and rumors of war. It is why Corp. U.S. is exactly following the pattern set in Adolf Hitler’s Germany, most recently by setting up a national personal identification system and the “Homeland Security Police” system after the pattern of Hitler’s “State Security Police” the dreaded SS. Historical Outline: 1st: Martial Law is declared by President Lincoln on April 24th, 1863, with General Orders No. 100; under martial law authority, Congress and President Lincoln institute continuous martial law by ordering the states (people) either conscribe troops and or provide money in support of the North or be recognized as enemies of the nation; this martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today. This martial law authority gives the President (with or without Congress) the dictatorial authority to do anything that can be done by government in accord with the Constitution of the United States of America. This conscription act remains in effect to this very day and is the foundation of Presidential Executive Orders authority; it was magnified in 1917 with The Trading with the Enemy Act (Public Law 65-91, 65th Congress, Session I, Chapters 105, 106, October 6, 1917). and again in 1933 with the Emergency War Powers Act, which is ratified and enhanced almost every year to this date by Congress. Today these Acts address the people of the United States themselves as their enemy. 2nd: The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a “municipal corporation” to govern the District of Columbia. Considering the fact that the municipal government itself was incorporated in 1808, an “Organic Act” (first Act) using the term “municipal corporation” in 1871 can only mean a private corporation owned by the municipality. Hereinafter we will call that private corporation, “Corp. U.S.” By consistent usage, Corp. U.S. trademarked the name, “United States Government” referring to themselves. The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 places Congress in control (like a corporate board) and gives the purpose of the act to form a governing body over the municipality; this allowed Congress to direct the business needs of the government under the existent martial law and provided them with corporate abilities they would not otherwise have. This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the ten mile square of the District of Columbia. See the effect of the District of Columbia Act of 1871. [Susan: “Organic” is a very, very important word; organic will come into play later but its inclusion in the NAME or TITLE of this Act is intrinsic to making this case.] 3rd & 4th: In said Act, Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution (United States Constitution), which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of the United States of America) except that it was missing the national constitution’s 13th Amendment and the national constitution's 14th, 15th and 16th amendments are respectively numbered 13th, 14th and 15th amendments in the Corp. U.S. Constitution. At this point take special notice and remember this Corp. U.S. method of adopting their own Constitution, they will add to it in the same manner in 1913. 4th: Corp. U.S. began to generate debts via bonds etc., which came due in 1912, but they could not pay their debts so the 7 families that bought up the bonds demanded payment and Corp. U.S. could not pay. Said families settled the debt for the payments of all of Corp. U.S.' assets and for all of the assets of the Treasury of the United States of America. 5th: As 1913 began, Corp. U.S. had no funds to carry out the necessary business needs of the government so they went to said families and asked if they could borrow some money. The families said no (Corp. U.S. had already demonstrated
that they would not repay their debts in full). The families had foreseen this situation and had the year before finalized the creation of a private corporation of the name "Federal Reserve Bank". Corp. U.S. formed a relationship with the Federal Reserve Bank whereby they could transact their business via note rather than with money. Notice that this relationship was one made between two private corporations and did not involve government; that is where most people error in understanding the Federal Reserve Bank system—again it has no government relation at all. The private contracts that set the whole system up even recognize that if anything therein proposed is found illegal or impossible to perform it is excluded from the agreements and the remaining elements remain in full force and effect. 6th: Almost simultaneously with the last fact (also in 1913), Corp. U.S. adopts (as if ratified) their own 16th amendment. Tax protesters challenge the IRS tax collection system based on this fact, however when we remember that Corp. U.S. originally created their constitution by simply drafting it and adopting it; there is no difference between that adoption and this—such is the nature of corporate enactments—when the corporate board (Congress) tells the secretary to enter the amendment as ratified (even thought the States had not ratified it) the Secretary was instructed that the Representatives word alone was sufficient for ratification. You must also note, this amendment has nothing to do with our nation, with our people or with our national Constitution, which already had its own 16th amendment. The Supreme Court (in BRUSHABER v. UNION PACIFIC R. CO., 240 U.S. 1 (1916)) ruled the 16th amendment did nothing that was not already done other than to make plain and clear the right of the United States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations and government employees. We agree, considering that they were created under the authority of Corp. U.S. 7th & 8th: Next (also 1913) Corp. U.S., through Congress, adopts (as if ratified) its 17th amendment. This amendment is not only not ratified, it is not constitutional; the nation's Constitution forbids Congress from even discussing the matter of where Senators are elected, which is the subject matter of this amendment; therefore they cannot pass such and Act and then of their own volition, order it entered as ratified. According to the United States Supreme Court, for Congress to propose such an amendment they would first have to pass an amendment that gave them the authority to discuss the matter. 8th: Accordingly, in 1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that successfully ran for reelection in 1913 by popular vote were seated in Corp. U.S. Senate capacity only; their respective seats from their States remained vacant because neither the State Senates nor the State Governors appointed new Senators to replace them as is still required by the national Constitution for placement of a national Senator. 9th: In 1916, President Wilson is reelected by the Electoral College but their election is required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Senate; where the new Corp. U.S. only Senators were allowed to participate in the Electoral College vote confirmation the only authority that could possibly have been used for electoral confirmation was corporate only. Therefore, President Wilson was not confirmed into office for his second term as President of the United States of America and was only seated in the Corp. U.S. Presidential capacity. Therefore the original jurisdiction government's seats were vacated because the people didn't seat any original jurisdiction government officers. It is important to note here that President Wilson retained his capacity as Commander in Chief of the military. [Susan: Very important; Bush Jr. was installed as the Commander only by SCOTUS as the popular vote was not upheld no matter how it came to be and SCOTUS has no power to make law thus install a President but only a Commander while Obama is installed as a President only as he was a sitting member of a Congress that issued an invalid declaration of war, bought the office and/or does not even qualify to sit thus has conflict he can never overcome then is installed as President only thus actual President & Commander fell to me as Roberts acted as if only until I made the case by PROVING the US defaulted (I had to secure the paper evincing US did not respond as it could not; I had to make it actual to prove the coup by CORP US at the expense of The People, our Constitution, is not merely theory but real thus CORP US is the guilty party as it turns us into an oligarchic puppet regime controlled by a cabal of MEN, no women, and not a Constitutional Republic). Not one other person in the US was able to follow the trail left history is and reason this very complex issue because: Not one person connected it their own injury personally; that is, not one other person volunteered to serve as the President and Commander and then took it to SCOTUS to prove ability and capability]. Many people wonder about this fact imagining that such a capacity is bound to the President of the nation; however, When John Adams was President he assigned George Washington to the capacity of Commander in Chief of the military in preparation for an impending war with France. During this period, Mr. Adams became quite concerned because Mr. Washington became quite ill and passed on his acting military authority through his lead General Mr. Hamilton and Mr. Adams was concerned that if war did break out Mr. Hamilton would use that authority to create a military dictatorship of the nation. Mr. Adams averted the war through diplomacy and the title of Commander in Chief was returned to him. (See: John Adams, by David McCullough, this book covers Mr. Adams concerns over this matter quite well.)
10th, 11th & 12th: In 1917, Corp. U.S. enters W.W. I and passes their Trading with the Enemies Act. 11th: In 1933, Corp. U.S. is bankrupt, they force a banking holiday to exchange money backed Federal Reserve Notes with “legal tender” Federal Reserve Notes the Trading with the Enemies Act is adjusted to recognize the people of the United States as enemies of Corp. U.S. 12th: Some time after 1935, you ask Social Security Administration for a relationship with their program. With the express purpose of generating Beneficiary funds to United States General Trust Fund (GTF) the Social Security Administration creates an entity with a name (that sounds like your name but is spelled with all capital letters) and an account number (Social Security number). They give you the Social Security card and let you know that the card does not belong to you but you are to hold it for them until they want it back. If you are willing to accept that responsibility over the card you activate the card by signing it, which gives you the ability to act as the fiduciary for the cards actual owner Corp. U.S. and you can use the card’s name and number to thus transact business relations for the card’s actual owner. You are also to note that though the card verifies its agency (you as the single person with authority to control the entity so created) it is not for use as identification. On review: notice the Social Security Administration was the creator of the entity, they offered you the opportunity to serve its Trustee capacity (by lending it actual consciousness and physical capacity), they gave you something (the card) that does not belong to you to hold in trust and they reserved the actual owner of the thing (Corp. U.S.) as the beneficiary of the entity—by definition, this only describes the creation and existence of a Trust. More importantly: the name they gave this Trust is not your name, the number they gave the Trust is not your number and your lending actual consciousness and physical capacity to this Trust’s Trustee capacity does not limit you or your capacity to separately act in your natural sovereign capacity in any way—what you do, when you do it and how you do it is still totally up to you. [Susan: See zip codes for if you use them? You are ‘agreeing’ to place your property in the federal domain. You subject yourself to imminent domain upon the federal level: CORP US not the Government of The People for the Common Good.] 13th: In 1944, under the Bretton Woods Agreement, Corp. U.S. is quit claimed to the International Monetary Fund, and becomes a foreign controlled private corporation. [From Melvin and Susan: BAD MATH FELLAS! Make sure you’re sitting down for this one. We turn now to United States Code (USC) Title 22 § 286 and read the following: "§ 286. Acceptance of membership by the United States in International Monetary Fund. "The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States in the International Monetary Fund (hereinafter referred to as the "Fund"), and in the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank"), provided for by the Articles of Agreement of the Fund and the Articles of Agreement of the Bank as set forth in the Final Act of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference dated July 22, 1944, and deposited in the archives of the Department of State. (July 31, 1945, ch 339, § 2, 59 Stat. 512.) Short titles: … May be cited as the ‘Bretton Woods Agreements Act’. "Other provisions: Par value modification. For the Congressional direction that the Secretary of the Treasury maintain the value in terms of gold of the Inter-American Development Bank’s holdings of United States dollars following the establishment of a par value of the dollar at $38 for a fine troy ounce of gold pursuant to the Par Value Modification Act and for the authorization of the appropriations necessary to provide such maintenance of value, see 31 USC § 449a."...The act further transfers the assets of the United States Treasury to the IMF by stating words to the effect of: ‘the United States Treasury is now the Individual Drawing account of the IMF’...Think about it. "The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States in the IMF" The President is authorized by whom? Congress? Well, even if Congress did authorize it where did they get the authority to so do? Certainly not from the Constitution, and Congress can’t lawfully do anything the Constitution doesn’t authorize them to do...The Constitution plainly states: "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people” Ninth amendment; and, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people” Tenth Amendment. Further this joining in the IMF is obviously an international agreement; and, any good dictionary will define, "an agreement between nations" as a "Treaty". The Constitution is very specific on how treaties are to be engaged in with this nation: 1st, the President signs the treaty; and 2nd, the Senate ratifies his signature with a two-thirds majority vote...That didn’t happen here. So if the right wasn’t given in the Constitution, Congress can’t take it and give it to the President. This act states that Authorization came from the U.N. instead of from Congress "provided for … as set forth in the Final Act of the United Nations": There was no treaty with the U.N. until December 20, 1945, five months later, so the U.N. could not exercise its treaty with Corp. U.S. If it did not add up then it never will; this is an example of the corporation “deciding” the UN would exist as a legal entity so PREDETERMINING we would enter a treaty with BEFORE that treaty thus that legal entity ever existed. I exactly named “predetermined judicial fate” in my petitions and brief, as this is an example of the Executive and Legislative attempting to circumvent WE thus the federal court. It is a deliberate act meant to violate the separation of powers thus give judicial power to those the founders said are most dangerous: “The legislative department is everywhere extending the sphere of its activity,
and drawing all power into its impetuous vortex”, Madison, Federalist 48. The Corporation US makes it seem as if We, the People have a voice in the reasoning and application of the law but the People do not as it is a done deal; that is, the Corporation US was never NOT going to enter this treaty thus they knew to author an act that presupposes it’s existence and that then is a denial of informed consent among other things. It is forced on the People as WE had no opportunity to volunteer with full consent. WE can never know if WE would have volunteered to conduct this experiment had WE been informed. The reason to release all officer’s of the Government from liability is no more thus the Trust as it exists today has out lived its purpose. You can never go back in time and make up that five month disparity as it is now history thus all you can and may do? Change it in the now thus address Obama’s unconstitutional election and Bush’s unconstitutional installation and do so supporting the bad math of this CORP US with the bad math of Bush V Gore as SCOTUS acted for wholly different reasoning than the designers of the early trust and the later IMF, as SCOTUS did not act in any way for profit or as it is being paid or will be paid in the future. To do this? You must then have a volunteer – ME – who understands these complex legal issues and then can and will ‘undo’ this Gordian Knot in consideration of ALL of the involved parties including the business needs of the government of The People and even the private businesses and so ‘unite’ the trust seats and the legal seats named in our Constitution as one government, of the People, as our interest is to be a commonly shared one in which the citizens do profit and some of this profit is in the form of monetary reward but do so ethically and morally thus NO CONFLICT and We, the People all ‘win’. I knew the bad math of Bush V Gore along with the ongoing and now “legally enforced” discrimination of women was the means to do this. SCOTUS lived out a law of this universe found within our governing documents even if they did not know it at the time that is not written out exactly but as an existing intrinsic concept; this law is also found within the Federalist Papers most notably in Federalist 10 as “cause” and “effect” are named exactly but the other element, the bigger or deeper element, is not exactly named. This law of the US? It is a universal law exactly as the Conservation of Energy and Matter is a law; it has existed since the creation of this universe. I merely defined what science knew of but could not define, exactly as Einstein defined Relativity. It is inviolate or inalienable. An example of an attempt to violate what is in inviolate? If the officers of any Trust act with deliberation to violate that Trust and/or our law in any way you do not reward those unjust persons with more money and then leave those same unjust persons in charge of the Trust! See Wallstreet Collapse and failure of the SEC to protect the People with no trustees removed and wholly invalid and unconstitutional employee bonus contracts enforced and paid out, which is The People being forced to pay tribute and to actual crooks). It might seem as if you are successfully violating a law of the universe as you seem to collect more and more ill gained ‘profit’ but you are not. You are setting up the trust and the People to fail and to fail on purpose as essentially the officers of the Trust (and so The People as the Executive & Legislative act as if it is perfectly legal and/or that they have no other options) have now been ‘conditioned’ to believe that they can do what they want when they want as if injury thus negative consequences do not accrue when that is not the case as our law differentiates between actual and legal or nature versus man thus if you need paper as proof? Look indirectly at your bank statement or retirement account or children committing violent crimes NOT at the paper the corrupted officers of the trust are directly generating as they are not honest and so cannot be trusted. The effect is an internal one that you cannot see with the naked eye as it changes who and what we are and so annihilates self-awareness as well as national or liberty awareness; it annihilates the concept known as ‘philadelphia’, acting as your brother’s keeper or extending your orbit to include or protect as many others as possible with or under US law, a part of which is liberty. You cannot deny The People liberty and yet be constitutional. It is not now and will never be a successful model of government. It’s about selfdiscipline and self-control. It begins with one and spreads to many; it becomes endemic; it is a terminal disease from which no other great government of the past ever recovered thus we will be first to overcome our own wild success exactly as a person may be made to overcome winning the lottery as every single decision or action in life is fraught with positive and negative consequences which is why we are to be informed and then act upon that informed, reasoned decision as WE act upon what WE truly believe thus your work and all the paper you produce as well as the worsening injuries and the state of this nation tells the truth of you and what you do or do not truly believe and to date? It seems as if you worship the graven image known as US dollars or as if you truly believe in something other then our Declaration and our Constitution]: 14th: In 1968, at the National Governor's Conference in Lexington, Kentucky, the IMF leaders of the event proposed the dilemma the State governors were in for carrying out their business dealings in Federal Reserve Notes (foreign notes), which is forbidden in the national and State constitutions, alleging that if they did not do something to protect themselves the people would discover what had been done with their money and would likely to kill them all and start over. They suggested the States form corporations like Corp. U.S. and showed the advantages of the resultant uniform codes that
could be created, which would allow better and more powerful control over the people, which thing the original jurisdiction governments of this nation had no capacity to do. Our Constitutions secure that the governments do not govern the people rather they govern themselves in accord with the limits of Law. The people govern themselves. Such is the foundational nature of our Constitutional Republic. 15th: By 1971, every State government in the union of States had formed such private corporations (Corp. State), in accord with the IMF admonition, and the people ceased to seat original jurisdiction government officials in their State government seats. Now, having stated these historical facts, we ask you not to believe us, but rather prove these facts for yourself. We then ask you to contact us and share your discovery with us. When you find there is no error in this historical outline, then remember these simple facts and let no one dissuade you from the truth. The Bottom Line: when you speak about these private foreign corporations remember that is what they are and stop calling them government. Further, it is very important that we cease to attempt to fix them. [Susan: It’s ‘foreign’ if it is alien to our law or not a part of the fabric of our original law as it is written in 1776 and 1787; ‘foreign’ does not necessarily mean “of or from another physical nation not your own” but means it is unAmerican or outside US law as authored by the Founders; it is not organic or inborn]. It is far more important that we learn [the history and the law]. By reseating our State and national governments in their original jurisdiction nature, we gain the capacity to hold these private foreign corporations accountable. They owe us a lot of money, in fact they owe us more money than there is available in the world. In fact it is impossible for them to pay and that gives us the leverage we need to take back our nation and put things right. The process is a simple one. The difficulty is in getting our people to wake up to the truth. That's why we ask you to prove the truth for yourself and contact us with your discovery. That means that you must stop acting and communicating like you are anything other than the sovereign that God created you to be. And, stop referring to Corp. U.S. or the STATE OF 'X' as anything other than the private foreign corporations that they are. And, finally, stop listening to the Patriot Mythology that is espoused by those that only give these facts lip service.” – TeamLaw / Eric Masden with Melvin & Susan. I EXACTLY NAMED PRIVATE MONEY AND FOREIGN INTERESTS, “DAVID ROCKEFELLER” AS A LONE PERSON AND AS A BODY OF BELIEF. I NEVER SWORE OUT ANY ALLEGIANCE TO ANY FOREIGN AUTHORITY OR CRIMINAL OR CORRUPTED OR INCAPABLE AKA UNSAFE AUTHORITY, NOT TO YOU, ROBERTS, CLINTON, BUSH OR OBAMA; I NOT ONCE EVER ACTED FOR ANY FOREIGN BUSINESS INTERESTS AND INSTEAD FOUGHT A LOCAL WALMART AND WON AS IT DOES UNCONSTITUTIONAL BUSINESS HERE AND ABROAD, NAMELY IN CHINA; I NEVER WILLINGLY AND KNOWINGLY SUPPORTED FOREIGNIZATION IN ANY WAY; I EVEN RAN TOLLS AS ROADS ARE SOMETIMES LEASED TO FOREIGN NATIONS EXACTLY AS FOREIGN NATIONS ‘OWN’ SOME RED LIGHT CAMERA TECHNOLOGY (See My point of law AGAINST the NY & The NY State Thruway Authority acting to collect tolls long after the agreed to cease and desist – when the Thruway was paid for in full). PLUS I WAS TRAFFICKED ACROSS STATE LINES AND SO I DO NOT IN ANY WAY IF AVOIDABLE SUPPORT MY INJURY. PERIOD. I DID NOT VOTE KNOWINGLY AND WILLINGLY IN ANY ELECTION PRIOR TO 2000, AS I NEEDED BVG TO TRANSPIRE THUS I THEN KNEW AND PUT IT ON THE RECORD IN 12/2000 IN A PHILADELPHIA COURT. BEFORE 2000 I DID NAME “UNJUST TAXES” “WOMEN HAVE NO PROTECTION” “ENDEMIC FEDERAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE” AND “MEN USURPING MY AUTHORITY OVER MY OWN PERSON AND MY CHILDREN” IN A NY COURT BUT I COULD NOT NAME WHAT WAS ENDEMICALLY BROKEN; I COULD NOT NAME “SITTING CORPORATION”, “SPIRIT OF PEOPLE” OR “LIBERTY NO MORE” UNTIL I WAS ACTUALLY SOLD; THEN I NEEDED TO WITNESS THE PEOPLE’S REACTION TO BVG, MY CASE AND WAR IN IRAQ TO KNOW. TODAY? I WITNESS NORTH KOREA ACTING AS THE AUTHORITY OVER MY PERSON AND THE US AGREEING AGAINST MY WILL AND IN SPITE OF MY CASE AND IN SPITE OF EXACTLY WRITTEN US LAW AND US CASE LAW AS JUDGES ARE NOW ACTIVELY COLLUDING OR CONSPIRING WITH THE CRIMINALS AND WITH THE TERRORISTS. IF NORTH KOREA MAKES A DEMAND AS IT DID REGARDING KIDNAPPED AMERICAN AND THE US “SUBMITS” BUT DOES SO WITH A PAST PRESIDENT LAW-ABIDING OR NOT? AND OBAMA LABELS IT PRIVATE TO AVOID PENALTY UNDER THE LOGAN ACT AND/OR TREASON CLAUSE? THE US IS NOW ACTING UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF NORTH KOREA, KENYA OR INDONESIA BUT NOT UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE US, OR, NOT UNDER OUR LAW AKA NOT THE WILL OF WE THE PEOPLE. FURTHER WHY AM I YET DENIED JUSTICE WHEN THE EQUIVALENT CRIME, ‘DOMESTIC’ KIDNAPPING, WAS PERPETRATED UPON ME AND MY CHILDREN BUT NO PERSON NOT EVEN A POLICE ONE ACTS FOR ME AS THEY RELY UPON FALSIFIED EVIDENCE WE ALL KNOW IS FALSE BUT USE THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL EXCUSE A JUDGE HAS NOT YET ‘REVOKED’ IT IN WRITING BUT DOES ACT FOR TWO JOURNALISTS WHO KNEW WHAT THEY WERE
DOING AND THE RISK THEY WERE TAKING? TO RESCUE THEM FROM THEIR OWN BAD JUDGMENT AND DO SO AT THE EXPENSE OF THIS NATION’S SOVEREIGNTY??? AS IF THEY HAD A REASONABLE EXPECTATION US LAW DID PROTECT THEM WHEN OBVIOUSLY IT IS NONEXISTENT FOR WOMEN IN GENERAL AND FOR ALL AMERICANS WITHIN THE PHYSICAL BORDERS OF NORTH KOREA??? AND THIS BENCH DOES NOT MAKE SO MUCH AS A PEEP??? I DID NOT AT ALL CONTRIBUTE TO MY INJURY KNOWINGLY BUT THEY DID AND YET I GET NO PROTECTION OF THE LAW AND THEY RECEIVE OVERLY BROAD PROTECTION? Is it because they are Asian and I am white? Because they act like the damsel in distress needing rescuing by a prince and I do not? Because a relative is a ‘well known’ or ‘famous’ reporter? Is it as I am a master reporter and they are amateurs? Is it because the in violation of the law Executive has no idea that North Korea cannot make good on its nuclear threat as it would then defy fundamental law of this universe but as they do not know the physics or are ignorant then they are kowtowing to an empty threat North Korea makes over and over thus are submitting to North Korea’s immoral authority? It is all of the above and more with the last one being the worst one. For almost three years I have been entering my knowledge of North Korea and its empty nuclear threat to federal court and Congress as China and oil is the actual reason we are in Iraq or it is fear based and anything fear based is not reality or is not constitutional. Your fear may have a rational basis but can that threat ever be carried out? If it is unconstitutional no, as it will violate what are fundamental laws of this universe. I accurately predicted this scenario but not the hostages. I posted it publicly to protect The People. CORP US interests lie in maintaining what is not true or even truthful about nuclear chain reactions and nuclear detonations. Some of CORP US does it intentionally and some of CORP US does not understand the physics involved or once again the math involved. I am an expert physicist and an expert constitutionalist as it is both law of this universe only in two different forms. The physics matches the Declaration & Constitution. I INFORMED THE FEDERAL BENCH AND THE SENATE OF MY CASE, BVG, PRIVATE PERSONS BUYING OFFICES AND FEDERAL CONTRACTS, ENDEMIC CORRUPTION OF OUR JUDICIAL BENCHES AND TAXES COLLECTED AS TRIBUTE AND THE BAD MATH INVOLVED; INSTEAD OF CHOOSING LAW AND SO WE THE PEOPLE IT CHOSE MONEY, PRIVATE INTERESTS, PROFESSIONAL POLITICIANS, THE CORRUPTED LEGAL PROFESSION AND OTHER CRIMINALS AS WELL AS ACTUAL TERRORISTS. IN 2008 I COULD HAVE FOUGHT AND WON THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTION DENYING ME MY LEGAL VOTE BUT REALIZED TO DO SO WOULD BE TO COOPERATE THUS THEN HAVE UNCLEAN HANDS SO INSTEAD I ACCESSED SCOTUS TO SECURE MY LEGAL STANDING THUS MY VOTE OR POWER AND AUTHORITY OVER MY OWN DESTINY AND FATE. On or around 12/22/06 when first reporting all I knew about NY’s corrupted court system to the FBI as well as the federal corporation’s involvement to seat a President who would be a foreigner to then protect private and foreign investments illegally made here and abroad at my expense thus I named HAWAII exactly as I knew it then would lead to a SCOTUS case of original jurisdiction? I NOT ONLY INVOKED MY RIGHTS AS A NATURAL BORN SOVEREIGN CITIZEN, A NATION UNTO MYSELF, BUT AS A SOVEREIGN CITIZEN OR RESIDENT OF FLORIDA. BUT I NAMED MY BIRTH IN NY AND MY SON’S CONCEPTION IN NY AS NY RATIFIED OUR CONSTITUTION AND MOST OF FLORIDA IS NOT A LEGAL POSSESSION OF THE US BUT FELL TO US VIA CONTRACT DISPUTES BETWEEN SPAIN & FRANCE AND AS SPAIN RELINQUISHED ITS FL TERRITORY VIA DEFAULT AS IT OPENLY VIOLATED AND THEN ACTIVELY OR KNOWINGLY DEFAULTED ON A 400 YEAR OLD CONTRACT OR TREATY IT HAS WITH THE NATIVES WHICH WE INHERITED BUT DID NOT KNOW OF THAT I THEN FOUND AND ENTERED TO SCOTUS AND THAT ROBERTS THEN READ AND ACTED UPON. O.J. AND LAND PATENTS ARE BASED UPON DERIVATION FROM A LEGAL TREATY THE US ENTERED WITH A FOREIGN OR OUTSIDE POWER NOT AN ILLEGAL, NEVER VALID TREATY! The UN is a foreign power operating openly on US soil as a nation within a nation but only for the purposes of serving the Corp US and not The People. Think of it as pedigree or provenance. Ask yourself: Where did that first man come from? What nationality is he? What is the very first treaty man had with a power outside of himself? Is it possible with modern science to trace all races ‘back’ to Eden or ADAM AND EVE VERSUS THEIR CREATOR? Yes, it is! If the right is inalienable, if ‘inalienable’ is a law, then you can prove it as hardcore fact thus prove the law. I out reasoned Corporate US and the federal bench’s denial of reality by entering TWO treaties, 1. Eden ( See Old Testament & Human Genome Project, Common X, physical birth of the form in Africa plus the region known as the Middle East/Asia border that is when and where man first came to reason on his own as we have scientifically proven; every treaty or contract after this was based upon Eden including the Iroquois Confederacy, Magna Carta & Mayflower Compact) AND 2. THE TREATY KNOWN AS “SPAIN’S 2ND EXPEDITION AND ONLY SURVIVING NOTES”, A TREATY THAT IS LEGAL, VALID & BINDING AS THE AUTHOR WAS ACTING FOR THE KING OF SPAIN, DETAILED EXACTING TERMS AND EVEN DEFINED EXACTING WORDS AND INFORMED THE KING OF THIS TREATY ENTERED WITH NATIVES AND SPAIN NEVER OBJECTED IN ANY WAY THUS IT STOOD AND WAS HONORED AT FIRST. AS THE US CANNOT
POSSIBLY MAKE GOOD ON A TREATY IT INHERITS FROM SPAIN VIA THE LA PURCHASE IF SPAIN HAS IT SITTING ON A SHELF IN STORAGE UNKNOWN AND UNTRANSLATED. IT YET STANDS AS VALID, BINDING AND LEGAL AS WE MUST HAVE AT LEAST ONE OPPORTUNITY TO FULFILL IT. FIRST THE PEOPLE MUST KNOW OR BE AWARE IT EXISTS. WHEN IT WAS MADE PUBLIC? I READ IT AND REALIZED: AN EXACT CONTRACT OR TREATY SITS WITHIN THESE NOTES! I CAN LEGALLY ARGUE THE SOVEREIGNTY OF MYSELF & WE THE PEOPLE BACK TO THIS TREATY THUS “VANQUISHING” THE CORPORATION US AND THEN ACROSS THE GLOBE TO OUR COMMONLY SHARED X DNA OR PROVE AUTHORITY IS INALIENABLE AKA AUTHORITY IS BORN OF THE EXACTLY NAMED CREATOR. Salvation history is legal
history! They are one and the same! My fact is: I am also a Native American not born and raised upon a legally recognized Reservation and never applied for nor accepted status as a citizen of a Sovereign Tribe other than Voter. I am not now and never was a dual citizen of any kind. I did not make my Confirmation in the Roman Catholic Institution or any Religious Institution as I refused to split my allegiance between the Creator and myself or the Constitution versus the institution of religion as that is rule not law and it is not science as the science would be known as theology not religion. When told that I must split my allegiance or commit perjury by saying I did truly believe Jesus the human is an outside authority over me and so is The One All Male God, that I am less than, or I could no longer live under my parent’s roof I volunteered to move out at age 16. I was willing to accept that negative consequence but was not willing to accept the consequences of lying to God and myself and before an entire church who is the People as the ‘church’ like the government is the Living People and I am not a criminal or worse a Traitor and I refuse to let any person turn me into one. The RCC and I both know as fact and law the Holy Spirit is female thus God is both sexes or no sex at all as The God is not engaging in the ACT of sex with anyone or thing but only the quality, unconditional love, but that is not taught outright so people are ‘taught’ to truly believe a lie only as they are not taught the whole truth. Religion and faith are two different things. My faith resides squarely in myself, God and US law. PERIOD. If I do not ever sink to your level? The Creator will preserve, protect and defend me. I reasoned my decision and made my choice: I’m A Native American who truly believes in the exact words of US law and The Founders as well as their actions. I’m not against religion but for theology aka law but I am against what Jesus never said and never intended. I will not as I cannot. Upon direct confrontation my father reasoned, “Do it as we all just did it.” I answered, “That is not a valid reason and in fact it goes against everything you ever taught me. I’m Susan; I CANNOT do that, as it is not a human ability I possess. Maybe you did and maybe lots of people did can but I? I can’t do what you are asking so I have only one choice: Move out. Do you even understand that you are asking me to act against what you yourself taught me and that I know to be true about this world?” I did not move out but I did set in motion a chain of causation that would eventually lead to the death of my family as that one act on my part then caused every person to examine their own actions and the lies they have been living for centuries. I’m the sole survivor. I only wish I could say that I knew then it would undo several centuries of abuse suffered at the hands of tyrants only some of whom were church officials – they are royalty, slave traders and feudal land owners - in England but mostly in Ireland and Scotland. If I had known? I would have lied during my first confession as I did only I would have done so with a real sense of purpose and meaning, with gusto or spirit instead of I am not a sinner and you are not going to convince me that I am defective. This is wrong. I would have done it unafraid not with terror in my heart but I got past that terror didn’t I? That’s: SOVEREIGNTY. I willingly, deliberately, knowingly and intentionally chose to be and then become a Natural Born American Citizen with a fully vested interest and right and my only motivation was and is liberty and justice or righteousness. I tell you as fact that after John Paul II contacted me and I won my case ‘against’ the Vatican and after I was within SCOTUS I then offered France a Treaty regarding PAST DUE WAR DEBT which We, the People are owed and even went so far as to send it to the UN DELEGATION knowing I would be proving We, the People are liberated thus sovereign from CORP US and the UN aka FOREIGN POWER and FOREIGN AUTHORITY. Check the facts as they are within JPII’s autobiography so you can fact check me if you are disposed to label me a liar: JPII loved America and spent time living and working in Baltimore, as did I. He opined: As wonderful as the US is and as much potential as it had to then secure justice upon a planetary level? It seemed America was overly focused on lawyers and scientists – paper proof – and so had no national identity the People rallied around like European nations did. WE had no heart. When he contacted me? I answered: No, our spirit has been broken by CORP US. The People are confused. I defended The People and our 1st Amendment as it seems as if our heart is erratically and forever all over the map because of Amendment #1 and we do indeed produce a lot of paper. We even call it a “paper chase”. But unlike 99.9% of Americans I know the real, actual reason the kids in the movie wanted to be in Prof. Kingsfield’s contract law class: SOVEREIGNTY, as the two governing documents are signed, federal contracts. Contract law then is a 8
doorway, one We first deliberately walked through in Eden. Sovereignty, as I did not ask The People for their permission as that is not our law thus ACTED as an AGENT of the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT as my legal standing made me the authority with the power to act on The People’s behalf. Not only was the UN/IMF Treaty no good but the UN member nations never had any intention of fulfilling the contract as France proved and it is an impossible standard The People must meet for how can any member nation fulfill that Treaty if its law is unjust and if its government contains the will and liberty of its people? It cannot; it is impossible to then fulfill the Treaty with CORP US even if CORP US was legal and places The People in the position of FOREVER BEING IN THE RED OR DEBT; IT MAKES THE INJURY PERMANENT AND WILL BE OUR DEATH AS A JUST GOVERNMENT AND EVENTUALLY THE PHYSICAL NATION WILL BE NO MORE. Living constitutions cannot do business with dead institutions; it does not work – ever. JOHN ROBERTS UPHELD MY CLAIM OF SOVEREIGNTY IN ALL WAYS VIA HIS 11/20/08 ACTION BASED UPON THIS VERY EVIDENCE AND MY LOGICAL, HISTORICAL AND SCIENTIFIC REASONING. I NAMED ALL OF THIS AND REASONED THE LAW I DEFINED AND INCLUDED EVIDENCE RISING TO PROOF NO SANE, EMOTIONALLY HEALTHY PERSON COULD DENY. I first entered this argument and this evidence rising to proof and then the proof itself – I, Susan, acting pro se - to the Middle District Of FL Federal Court on April 4th, 2007. NY, PA & PARTS OF FL (you must consider that Spanish contract) THAT WE LEGALLY TOOK
POSSESSION OF ARE STATES, SOVEREIGN STATES WITHIN A SOVEREIGN NATION. ALL CITIZENS ARE SOVEREIGN OR WE EACH POSSES CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY OVER OUR OWN PERSONS. I ENTERED THOSE STATE CONSTITUTIONS TO THE FEDERAL COURT IN THEIR ENTIRETY PLUS MY OWN TESTIMONY OF BEING EFFECTED BY THE UN AS A RESIDENT OF NY. LAST TIME I FACT CHECKED? WASHINGTON DC IS NOT A STATE BUT IS THE CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS OR SEAT OF THE CORPORATION NOT THE SEAT OF THE LEGAL GOVERNMENT (THAT LEGAL, ORIGINAL SEAT WOULD BE WHEREVER I AM AS I LEGALLY SIT IN SCOTUS NOW HAVING ENTERED DIRECTLY UPON AN CLAIM OF O.J. THUS NEPTUNE BEACH, FL IS NOW THE SEAT OF ACTUAL, ORIGINAL POWER AND AUTHORITY AKA US SOVEREIGNTY AS EXACTLY NAMED WITHIN OUR CONSTITUTION AND MARBURY AS NB, FL IS MY REAL ADDRESS). I WENT SO FAR AS TO EXACTLY NAME THE HONOR BOUND AGREEMENT BETWEEN WASHINGTON, HAMILTON AND JEFFERSON THAT CREATED DC AS THEY NEVER INTENDED FOR US, WE THE PEOPLE, TO BECOME A PRIVATE AND FOREIGN CONTROLLED COMMODITY NOR A PUBLICLY TRADED ONE. THEY DID NOT SELL US INTO SLAVERY AND/OR HUMAN BONDAGE BUT LIBERATED US. DC RATIFIED NOTHING IN OUR GOVERNING DOCUMENTS. DC IS A NECESSARY ‘CORRUPTION’, A LEGAL ENTITY WE NEEDED AFTER THE FACT TO THEN AVOID CONFLICT BUT IT SEEMS AS IF WE CREATED A WORSE CONFLICT: VOTING RIGHTS OF CITIZENS IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA “ differ from those of United States citizens in each of the 50 states. D.C. residents do not have voting representation in the United States Senate and only a delegate in the House of Representatives, but D.C. is entitled to three electoral votes for President. The United States Constitution grants congressional voting representation to the states, which the District is not. The District is a federal territory ultimately under the complete authority of Congress.” A CONFLICT, as you must go back to the word “organic” in the “The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871”
as it is organic to the CORP US, INBORN TO OR OF CORP US; OR MATERIALLY (legally) INSEPARABLE, and not We The People; it is not organic to the Constitution whatsoever. There is no relation. It’s also not organic to the 1808 creation or incorporation of the municipal authority. It MUST be the CORP US not The People no matter how it is worded as it is redundant and unnecessary otherwise and goes against everything our Founders ever said they truly believed and then proved via living it out as real. It makes no logical or rational sense if you attempt to assign it any other legal status than being the CORP US not We The People us with a small ‘u’ but it reads it is organic exactly thus openly admits to being CORP US not The People. A CONFLICT WASHINGTON, HAMILTON AND JEFFERSON NEVER, EVER INTENDED FOR US AS DC BECAME A DIVIDED INTEREST BETWEEN CORP. US VERSUS WE THE PEOPLE. [A corruption of US law is not necessarily itself corrupt because of the due process clauses and our living nature or DC is as it acts.] I
NAMED ALL OF THIS EXACTLY, EXCEPTING SOME EXACT DATES OR ENTERED IT AS AN ATTACHMENT IN THE FORM OF AN ARTICLE, PAGE FROM A BOOK OF HISTORY, PHOTOGRAPH OR 1 st PERSON EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY ETC. AS I HAVE VISITED THE CORPORATE SEAT MY OWN SELF! I WAS DELIBERATELY SETTING UP THE FRAME WORK FOR MY EVENTUAL SCOTUS WIN, A LEGAL VICTORY THAT IS ALREADY, AS I EXACTLY STATED “THIS IS A CASE OF ORIGINAL JURISDICTION THAT CAN ONLY BE ADJUDICATED IN SCOTUS.”
2. I STATED THIS AT LEAST 3 DOZEN TIMES IN A HUNDRED VARIOUS WAYS and each time the judiciary reasoned and decided cases of o.j. are or are not only as they say so in spite of actual reality, my faultless reasoning and US law. THEN THE JAX FEDERAL COURT ARBITRARILY FILED SOME ATTACHMENTS BUT
NOT OTHERS. LATER IT, A SPECIFIC CLERK I FOUGHT WITH FROM DAY ONE MINUTE ONE and who was the same clerk present when I appeared in person in the clerk’s office in an attempt to secure these documents and who, on 4/4/07 corrected ‘predicted’ that if I disobeyed and filed them then I would never receive a copy but used MONEY as the reason as in ‘you will never be able to pay our asking price as you’re poor’, AND THEN THE BENCH ITSELF, REFUSED TO COPY THOSE IT DID NOT SCAN THUS THEY WERE NOT EVEN AVAILABLE ON PACER. EVEN WHEN I APPEARED IN PERSON I DID NOT MANAGE TO GET A COPY OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PROOF DUE TO THAT CLERK’S ACTIONS. 1st CLASS MAIL? THEY WROTE BACK ACTING AS IF I NEVER ASKED FOR A COPY OR AS IF THEY COULD NOT UNDERSTAND A SIMPLE REQUEST. AS FOR PRICE? I HAVE BEEN QUOTED 3 or 4 PRICES AND 1 OF THOSE IS IN WRITING; WHEN I SAID I’LL PAY ANY AMOUNT OF DOLLARS YOU NAME fully knowing they are worthless? SUDDENLY THE POST OFFICE NOT THE LEGISLATURE IS A GREEDY, IMPETUOUS VORTEX or so the clerks claim SO MY REQUESTS DISAPPEAR. The attachment entered
April 4th, 2007 under the name “Susan” only contains the entire paper trail, all the way back to Common X and then even further back into time. It includes the 1st women’s rights conference held at Senca Falls NY in 1859. It’s how I resolved Uniformity or united Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. The appearance of it all is deceiving, isn’t it? Einstein gave me a clue: when I noticed everything about us seemed to be false and an appearance only? I recalled: Einstein never, ever came to believe Neils Bohr’s Copenhagen model. Experiments appeared to prove Bohr correct and Einstein seemed to have acquiesced but in reality? Einstein went to his grave insisting what we saw in the lab was a deceptive appearance and that our assumptions based upon that appearance HAD TO BE INCORRECT. Not maybe but HAD TO BE INCORRECT. He said, You can never, ever author a theory re a law based upon what you observe and then use the very same observations to prove your theory! Your observations do not prove your theory is law as you must predict what we do not know and then based upon your theory watch to see if your theory is correct or incorrect but all these guys were doing is observing phenomena and then claiming it is proof! How is it proof if you SEE IT FIRST and THEN GO BACK AND MAKE UP A LAW???? If you cater your theory or your law to then fit what you just saw??? That’s not proof! I thought, AHA! Predetermined judicial fate! Law that assumes a legal entity or legal power exists when it does not!!! Like the discrimination of women and no law license presupposes I am defective and not able or capable!!! Like falsified orders that then force my legal complaint to fit the order not the order fitting my complaint or argument!!! The order has to match my complaint, the Constitution, US case law and the line of reasoning must be w/o fault; you may not change my complaint to then fit your ruder within the order itself! AHA! It is garbage that in no way matches actual reality...which means: as it is a chain all I have to is locate the missing link, that one paper that then unites or proves it is all a lie and a crime against me that ballooned to unbelievable proportions as I pursued my case all the way to SCOTUS thus the actual guilty parties acted worse and worse – as they became afraid they’d eventually be caught. I was not so stupid as to tell everything I knew, as I would have been happy to resolve the issue with my children and the horrific abuse we suffered alone. When I realized the magnitude of my case? I knew I had to bring it or no other person could or would, as there is a scientific or legal point of no return. Then I became good and mad the more I uncovered. INDIGNANT! I was able to connect the dots thus know how this came to harm me on a very personal level and that injury is so severe you can never make up for it. As TeamLaw said: You CORP US & the first guilty parties do not have enough money to make this up to me. NY? Every bit of this is connected to NY. And DC or the Federal level. I’m not to be faulted if YOU, the sitting federal judiciary were duped by CORP US and the false appearances so now make justice impossible thus aid and abet the crooks knowingly and unknowingly, whether you meant to or not. The Founders said: NEVER let your guard down for a single second. They also said master every discipline you can as you’re gonna need it to fight the lawyers. Jefferson despised lawyers for a reason. Actual law as written in 1776 and 1787 and US case law? Put up or shut up as in cease and desist writing words you can never support in any actual, legal court of law like SCOTUS and that only serve to prove your own guilt as your words – your work – self-evince or prove you to be repugnant thus your [this] order is void; stop lowering yourself to the same level as the crooks as you are federal judges: “the Constitution's written nature, and the formal enumeration of the powers of government would be empty promises if there were no means to measure the actions of the government against the Constitution, and strike down those found wanting (see Marbury V Madison, supra, at 177) "[c]ertainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every such government must be, that an act of the legislature repugnant to the constitution is void’”. RULE is 10
never an acceptable authority! As the order is void then you are null and void. You and your work, this order, is repugnant. It is my protected, fully vested and exactly worded right to abolish and dissolve you and your work, the insufferable and unjust form. Abolishing and dissolving the order is frivolous as you then would only issue more repugnant orders. Federalist 10 instructs me to attack and address the cause if possible. This bench, now a part of CORP. US is the cause as it acted against The People. If you feel stupid? That’s because the Jax bench made you look stupid via their criminal actions. I put it in writing and then went to the courthouse and said it in person: You are obstructing justice. You are deliberately preventing John Roberts from executing his duties and preventing any other judge from doing the same. I named the criminal acts. You are knowingly, willingly and deliberately – intentionally – doing everything you can to keep the ugly truth of your own actions secret. Knowing they set out to give you, this bench, what constitutes falsified evidence - those manufactured orders – that do not match anything at all but the legal definition of exact criminal acts and to strip you of proof by pulling a complaint and by refusing to scan or copy the most crucial evidence– as we all knew as long as I never appeared in person they could DENY knowledge of me (incorrect! But that’s what they truly believed). I wrote all of this down exactly. I, Susan, pulled a play from my own book and so went AROUND them to SCOTUS fully knowing YOU fell in between. My action granted you immunity as I HAD ZERO CONTACT WITH YOU THUS WHEN THE CRIMES ARE EXPOSED? YOU WOULD NOT BE IN THE CHAIN. It couldn’t be you, the 11th District Appellate. We never even met on paper! I knew I might have to come back here to then make Roberts a pro se litigant against CORP US. To prove it is endemic? You then go to the one place you have never been. Here we go:
WHAT COURT LOOKS AT THE SCOTUS DOCKET AND SEES ROBERTS ACTED OR SOME SCOTUS EMPLOYEE ACTED, THAT THE US DID INDEED DEFAULT OFFICIALLY AS 45 DAYS WENT BY NOT 30 OR LESS, AND SEES A PRO SE NONLAWYER LITIGANT WAS CONFERENCED TWICE THUS HEARD TWICE (NY forced me to have to do it twice!) AND THEN...ACTS AGAINST THE VICTIMS – THE PEOPLE OR THEIR OWN SELVES??? UNDER US LAW IF THE CHIEF JUSTICE OR SCOTUS ITSELF ACTS? AND THE FACTS AND ALL EVIDENCE SUPPORT THAT ACTION LIKE ALL THE US CASE LAW I CITED AND OBAMA’S OWN WORDS PLUS THE 30 OR SO SUITS AGAINST HIM AND AN ENTIRE WAR AND ALL OF US HISTORY TO BOOT? IF YOU THEN DENY IT OR ACT AGAINST IT YOU ARE MAKING ONE OF THREE CLAIMS: 1, YOU ARE GUILTY. 2, YOU ARE UNFIT (WHO CARES WHY?) OR 3. YOU DO NOT KNOW SOMETHING. IT’S THE LAST ONE, #3. So then: TeamLaw, Melvin and Susan are correct regarding the above facts one of which is UNDENIABLE AS MATH IS AN INVIOLATE LAW: the five month disparity between the signing of the Treaty and the Act itself as you cannot ENACT what does not yet exist! Math in SCOTUS? In SCOTUS, if it is a Presidential election, it may be per curiam ONLY if it truly is in our best interests but if it is? It then must be 9 as 1 or 9 5-4 as 2 thus SCOTUS acting as 1 FOR The People thus FOR the Constitution! Those exact words “per curiam” should not fool anybody most especially currently sitting federal judges as you know what per curiam actually means and is. You may not have known the real reason why SCOTUS never, ever uses it but now you do as I told you. Math in my life? MAY 99 comes before JULY 99 as does DECEMBER 08. Personally opine all you wish; you can never reason those disparities away. If Bush is installed there is NO PRESIDENT OF THE US; if Obama installs himself? There is NO COMMANDER OF THE US. If I slowly and carefully make this case and file it as a pro se woman who is born into the injury known as patriarchy that then became criminal in nature 200 years later? There’s no CORP US only We The People as named in the Declaration and only We The People as named in our Constitution but with me as its President and Commander. If there is no legally recognized UN then there is no act naming the UN as it is not a legal entity or legal authority yet, it’s there in NYC but not written law yet, thus we cannot enact and engage in what is not legal and then sign the Treaty ex post facto. Action follows the idea or thought. 1st you recognize it and then you create legislation re it. If you create the legislation first? It’s like Congress creating an amendment to then have the power to DISCUSS how and where Senators are elected and then, upon that discussion, creating more amendments about how and where Senators are actually elected. Think: Men congress; they discuss and debate. If you need an amendment to congress and your name happens to be Congress and that word is in both governing documents already??? You are no longer a Constitutional Republic as you’re changing the very fabric of our Constitution!!! I smell a rat and how. Einstein would roll over in his grave! It constitutes actual ex post facto law – unfounding your Republic or turning it into something else like an oligarchy - or it constitutes pre facto law, anticipatory but which might never come to be real law, a done deal w/o any representation, but however you choose to count it the math as well as the reasoning and application is bad, very bad. See the FCC enacting policy as law but then holding public hearings as if the policy and then the application of the law is still a matter of debate when it is not. This is not actual, legal constitutional representation; it is not a government of living people! Jefferson believed Marbury was a solid legal decision but warned: due to the nature of man it had the POTENTIAL to result in an oligarchy; he warned us it is not SCOTUS or any institution it is the men within the offices but SCOTUS and the Office of Chief
Justice is an animal you MUST be always aware of – ALWAYS AND FOREVER as if overthrow happens? It’ll come out of there or enter there. Yes as that’s chain of command theory. As ours is never ending? SCOTUS is the flash point! What’s brighter than the flare known as BVG? Rehnquist jumped up and down - all over the paper, lol. With his ethic he said LOOK HERE! IT’S THIS! So I did. To me it was obvious. Then, Stevens said, It’s this exact thing: LAWYERS!!! And Bush Jr. isn’t one, not even in theory according to CORP US. A clue, as Bush unlike Gore is exmilitary. 3. If you wholly disregard the 5 month disparity the UN still is not legal as the US has refused to sign its human rights Charter and the only reason for that? Past administrations some of who are unjust persons within those administrations have openly stated it is because of WOMEN AS THE EQUALS OF MEN clauses thus the US will not sign that Charter or Treaty and so CORP US does not practice its own exactly written law! “Authorities” then admit or openly confess the US as a living Government of People exists in theory only not in practice! They are claiming that a living government is not our law! A Living Government of People is our law and it is intrinsic to our law. It is also actual reality as in no people? No CORP US let alone Government of People. Who or what would you be trading and violating if you had no living people? The ‘authorities’ admit they act upon and for the Corporation US but not upon and for WE, the People. And it’s reasoning? Fatally flawed as equal protection is a law of this universe thus these MEN as the corporate authority, the Office of the Executive, is exclusively male and unjustly so is openly and actively injuring me only for woman and w/o any legal named reasoning or cause as the one it names is wholly manufactured as it is not about sovereignty of the US but is about men controlling women and children, or, buying and selling their persons. The only legal and logical conclusion based upon the actual facts or actual reality, as it is now not as you personally want it to be to then avoid this case, US law, exact words and good or correct math as well as science and US case law is: I’m the acting, legal President and Commander of original jurisdiction and upon my appearance in person in SCOTUS I then make John Roberts the acting, legal Chief Justice of original jurisidction as well as the currently sitting Justices legal as SCOTUS is the lone institution besides myself that has not been corrupted or has been consistently self-correcting aka self-adjudicating thus is still in line, LAWFUL, or exists as intended as written by its creators: The Original Founders including Marshall (all of them) and our Creator aka what came before the Declaration and Constitution. See “A Summary View On The Rights Of British America” by Jefferson. I knew as fact to prove WE are a living government and that women have been violated wholly I had to author a SCOTUS authority case of o.j. pro se as all lawyers have unclean hands and if I did not author my own case who then did? It constitutes 1st person eyewitness testimony and so it is to be accepted as absolute fact and truth unless you can cast doubt upon me that I cannot then reason for you. Thus far? You have resorted to perjury as that doubt is nonexistent, once again as supported or proven by Roberts action on 11/20/08. If you read the same complaints and petitions supported by the same evidence Roberts did then how in the world did you ever have to come to own such a diametrically opposing viewpoint in regards to American history and US law than the sitting Chief Justice? You had more evidence in support of my claim and you had something Roberts did not have: My brief. How does Roberts possess actual faith in himself, God and US law while you seem to possess none whatsoever and seem to think US law is matter of your personal belief or that it only exists if you say so? That idea has a name: It is known as the Biocentric model of the universe and it was mostly authored by avowed atheists who routinely violate the ethic of the People found within the Declaration and Constitution. These ‘scientists’ espouse the belief, and this is the exact words of one of them, that “Let’s face it. Once you turn your back on the moon? It ceases to exist.” No, US law and the government of The People only ceases to exist if you turn your back on it and then come to TRULY BELIEVE you are The Creator and so have the power to destroy what is inalienable. LIABILITY forces you to answer to the Creator and to your victim: I, Susan. Ideally you want to unseat the crooks as they came to exist now (but not necessarily as they were born or as they were when first they sat) and then reseat them with ethical and moral persons. Or you need all currently sitting officers to be accountable and responsible and then act to fulfill their duties under our law in both letter and spirit and this must then begin at the top, Executive, and then at the bottom, lone citizen or voter. You do not want two governments; you do not want a shadow one that is not what was intended or one split in two with divided interests and you do not want foreigners or crooks running this nation and killing We the People spiritually and/or physically. It is highly unlikely any people currently sitting will volunteer to submit to the authority of the Constitution any time soon as every time they are to do so they blatantly refuse and then add injury to insult by telling the People in no uncertain circumstances that they, not the Constitution and not the lawful government of People have all of the power as no judge is willing to obey the law either thus stop them. These unjust men brag openly about their ability to exploit the law thus the People. They brag openly that judges are in their pockets as if they do not actually buy them with money or
favor they then use fear as their currency. It is on the evening news every day; it is in all the papers and as I lived in Baltimore, MD? I myself, with my own ears, have heard them brag. At a political rally in FL? I, my own self, with my own ears, heard them brag and witnessed them abused exactly named, fully vested, protected rights and even target defenseless women. At this rally? A private person who is an agent of the Republican Party acting as if he was a military power authorized as such by the law and so by the People attempted to rough me up and got the surprise of his life: I said NO and exactly told him that I knew what was actually ‘going on’ and that if he wanted to go to jail it was his choice as first I’d sue him civilly to then force criminal trial as that is how you inform the People. I told him, “I will be seeing you in SCOTUS.” Did I lie or did I then go do it? I am as I act. I unincorporated us by dissolving all kinds of personal, mistaken and at times false belief and the ‘inserted’ or entrenched corruption of the law thus liability does indeed ensue as you knew as I told you. Some of it was legal at the time, it seemed to be then and did work then but now it does not, and some of it never was legal and so is not now legal. Legally you never were incorporated and me? I never agreed. Then whatever that thing was that you referred to as a just government? Even you, the US in the form of the Solicitor General, defaulted on 11/05/08 after I informed it of the fact and law plus the correct application of US law to all persons across the board. Even you, the CORP US, could not stand that ugly, clumsy thing you only called a government of the People when it is not. Is a federal judiciary beholden to CORP US, deriving its power from the Corporation and not the People, even remotely constitutional? No and even Hamilton would balk at that idea. Hamilton’s idea is that money can often buy the requisite education or can accord you necessary life experience poverty might not as people who overcome gross adversity via extraordinary effort are few and far between. Hamilton never intended for a strong federal Corporation at the very extinction of the People! He intended to create a centralized government of People not a corporate trust or a privately funded trust; Hamilton as a private citizen and as an officer? One and the same thus there is no conflict. Hamilton, Adams and Marshall never once named this thing we are today. What is my proof? LIFE: I can read Marbury and in Marshall’s own hand plus when this idea first came close to being realized? Hamilton voted for Jefferson to defeat Burr legally and then placed himself between Burr and the People thus took an actual bullet for us to defeat Burr physically. Upon reading what original jurisdiction actually is and means you must reverse or overturn your own ruling or when I do eventually win - physically win as legally it has happened or is done – either in a court or in real life as the People finally suffer so much they are moved to support my Presidency and with violence if your unconstitutional actions make that necessary? You set yourself up for death as you incited that violence and as the Fifth Amendment says WE do not need to convene a grand jury in this case to then charge, try and convict you thus hang you. You were to command, no? YES, AND IN TIME OF ACTUAL WAR. I am a keen observer and I have keenly and wisely observed you named no actual, legal reason for abandoning your command. NOTHING AT ALL. You said it is DISMISSED and MOOT but not WHY. You did exactly quote Rule not law or case law “42-4”, a rule not written by a Founder and in a spirit SCOTUS has in the past thrown out as a form of discrimination and that I named as a form of evidence tampering as it is a deliberate manipulation or manufacturing of the evidence JOHN ROBERTS and so SCOTUS will eventually see, hear, feel and weigh, citing the governing documents are "ENTIRELY WITHOUT MERIT" meaning you looked right at the SCOTUS docket, American history books and even the UN in NYC (I named the UN in a prior complaint) - all of which is a product of the two US governing documents so they must have some merit - but then DENIED and DISMISSED it all or CONFESSED TO YOUR GUILT IN WRITING! You are saying that WE, the people aka the Constitution is entirely without merit and that my birth is without merit for if the Revolution was never fought and I was never born in America naturally? I never would have entered SCOTUS, the US never would have defaulted on 11/05/08 and Roberts never would have acted on 11/20/08. Are you serious? Do you truly believe WE are this silly or that we would ever come to believe the Revolution was not fought? Or that Obama/Biden is legal? I told you within my brief: "You can make an attempt to defeat the math, US law and history - the universe - but guess what? Only the mentally ill or insane do that." I take it then your plea is insanity? As you are claiming Roberts himself and his action is w/o merit? That he too is ‘crazy’ and cannot read? That like you some disembodied being put a pen in his hand and a gun to his head and forced him to write "DENIED" any and all protection of the law? You made a mistake: Roberts never said any such thing. The appearance of the paper and computer generated docket only makes it seem as if. You, unlike he, wrote "MOOT". Exactly. YES, I AGREE AS WE ALL DO: THE DECLARATION AND CONSTITUTION IS NOW
MOOT AS OFFICERS LIKE YOU RENDER IT MOOT VIA YOUR ACTIONS THUS I WIN AGAIN AS YOU CONCURRED! YOU’RE MY PROOF OF DEATH. You, an other federal court do not have John Roberts reason;
you are not acting as John Marshall as he is. You do have another choice that is now available as Roberts and I provided it; we created the opportunity for you. My true belief is: This court means to place the burden of 13
petitioning SCOTUS on me and is confident it can escape liability by claiming it acted and only failing to act is a crime. Not in this instance. I exactly named this. I also reported it to the FBI in writing, exactly. You do not want to cast your lot with the crooks! If you did not know something? I will name the exact people to fault who are guilty but for this one thing? The Jax Federal civil division as they withheld evidence and committed actual crimes to then ‘trick’ you into doing it too and/or to suggest you are guilty when you cannot know what they refuse to tell you or when they perjure themselves. You’re supposed to truly believe my testimony and Roberts (SCOTUS) action in support of it. We’re US law or The People. But how do you know as absolute fact? SUSAN STICKS OUT LIKE A SORE THUMB AS NO LAW LICENSE. If the profession is endemically corrupted? The only standard you have is a nonlawyer and Supreme Court Justice or any Supreme Court employee as they have a chinese wall around them and as they tell the truth of who and what they are all over the paper they produce and make public. It’s a permanent record. A worldwide permanent record. If they act? A litigant had to move them with fact and law. With REASONING.
4. I have a volunteer (in fact I have several). It was not humanly possible for him to act before he read my brief as SCOTUS denied him informed consent thus now he can and may. Upon re-entry to SCOTUS? He or any willing volunteer then joins my case thus appearing in the caption. That makes him Vice President. He's a voter acting in his official capacity as a voter as well as an individual. If he chooses not to continue? Next person to get to me and volunteer wins IF they name their case and so every element. Upon our win he then gets his name on the ballot for President in 2012 as a candidate independent from me or in his own right. This then makes us a brand new case of original jurisdiction. Thus, you want to reconsider if you exist as a judge and as a living, breathing human being let alone an American as SCOTUS is waiting for me as are The People. Thousands maybe millions of people know my case. Why don’t you? Media blackout as CORP US owns it. All Obama lawsuits, not merely my own, are ‘conveniently’ being ignored by the media as the federal bench is making it easy for the crooks some of whom are ‘reporters’. The People have been using alternate media sources. It’s like pamphleteering all over again only it’s electronic. Now, you know as fact and law that you do not – NOT – have the power or authority to overturn an action of John Roberts, your Chief Justice, as you did not object to his appointment or his actions prior to my appeal w/o a hearing in person. Is this bench now claiming that it does possess constitutional authority over the People and over the Chief Justice? This order constitutes this bench making the claim that Roberts action is unconstitutional and is “entirely without merit” thus the action and the man who did it, Roberts, is dismissed and moot or is void, not the office of Chief Justice. Entirely without merit is another way to say the word repugnant. Are you certain you want to make this claim before SCOTUS and so the People? As logically this then means you are ordering that the People are repugnant thus void and so CORP US is now a made legal or legally enforced oligarchy. Do you now understand how and why this order is you committing treason? 5. You may not issue an ORDER that applies to me uniquely as a 20 page limit does based upon my unique facts which you yourself read thus own or issue an order that instructs a clerk to commit what is a violation of the Constitution and is a criminal act known as treason. You knew as hardcore fact that such an order is not constitutional but went and did it anyway. I exactly named this exact action with exact words thus you read my motion and my brief as well as Marbury so owned this knowledge, that it is unconstitutional and a violation of my fully vested, protected rights as well as an overturning of past federal precedent set by SCOTUS aka US case law, but then acted to do it. This is not so complex; it is basic reasoning you learn as a child not in law school. Science says that you own a conscience at about age 4; my own life proves this is a fact as at age 4 I owned the knowledge of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ or ‘ability’ versus ‘capacity’. If you were not raised to know? It’s a law of human psychology: Children who have no conscience grow up to be actual psychopaths and so are, for the most part, confined to jail and insane asylums as actual psychopaths do not fear being caught thus act in the open. If you are one who has not been caught yet? Law school and then life taught you, as you are a FEDERAL judge not a state judge. You would not exist if not for the federal interpretation and concept of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ known as Marbury, as if not for Marbury? No constitutional authority as an institution. No redress. Marbury then led to all of it, and to USC 1331. Marbury birthed you, as you exist today, as did both governing documents. Marbury is you, applies to you and makes it possible for the people to then empower you. You cannot be separated from Marbury. If you do separate yourself from Marbury? Then you have no basis to then answer any federal questions thus have no authority whatsoever over the People as the authority named in the constitution belongs to the lone citizen only. Our founders left it for WE, the People, to decide; they not once named any power over us that then GAVE the People power; they said the exact opposite or WE give power to you. Logically then WE already own power and authority
as symbolized by our one vote. You do not decide if or how I vote. I voted against you and any person aligned with CORP US by entering SCOTUS directly. John Roberts upheld my vote as legal. It counts and it is one of only two of all cast that are legal. If it was not? Roberts would never ever have acted on 11/20/08. Marbury V Madison clearly states all people are each accountable and responsible thus if that order is obeyed in open and direct violation of the letter of the law and/or its spirit and which is itself in violation of Marbury? It overturns Marbury thus dissolves SCOTUS in favor of CORP US. The clerk is the liable in addition to the judges signing off on it as the clerks are to defy such an order as it itself is intrinsically, fatally flawed: It constitutes a criminal act. This travesty of a decision, ruling and order is evidence rising to proof and the person or people who wrote it? Absolute proof, proof itself, of all I claimed. No living people acting legally or illegally? No people then no idea then no action then no order then no proof. Dead bodies do not produce cognizant work, paper or otherwise. My true belief is: These judges are shocked and angry; they have never, ever read a petition or brief like mine and feel insulted as that is what my words were meant to do (plus I can’t seem to refrain from a joke or two as this is so tragic you laugh or you’d never stop crying) and they fear the imbalance of power so much they refuse to confront the legal issue: DISCRIMINATION OF WOMEN NOW BEING REALIZED AS DISCRIMINATION OF THE ETHICAL AND/OR VERY INTELLIGENT. The painful emotional truth they cannot seem to own? The exact same one Roberts and I had to conquer: Owning the fact that we had been victimized by CORP US; that we were victims when that seems to be impossible as HOW can that happen to the Chief Justice or to me if we are so able and knowledgeable? If proof is life isn’t the proof that we are not victims the fact that we rose to power on our own volition? No, we rose to power in spite of our own hard work as people absolute us to death deliberately digging and picking at our human frailties...lawyers actually sat down and psychologically profiled us to then find a flaw they could exploit. Lawyers do the same thing before this bench and then even change their arguments based upon what they think they know but do not. Honesty is not the same thing as sincerity; a lawyer can be honest but wholly insincere. Until this bench can admit it too is a victim? Creating justice is not possible. If this bench is having a difficult time digesting any of this? Put your self in Roberts shoes: He is a person who is innocent; he truly believed he was executing his duties under our law and under the authority of the US. He came to be in a place and time whereby a case crossed his desk informing him that his own appointment was never legal and that he was acting under CORP US not the Constitution. How does one process that if they are the sitting Chief Justice? Even if he knew before he sat and sat to then protect The People against CORP US he then had to deal with it in that moment as the case finally arrived. If he can and his clerks can then this bench must then rise to meet us. “Entirely without merit” constitutes an exact lie or perjury in this case. 6. The only reason I'm motioning for you to reconsider your reasoning, decision and ruling or your application of lawlessness and rule but not anything actually written by The Founders? So the process is finally exhausted thus when WE do put you to death? You cannot cry you did not know or that WE did not inform you. WE did inform you and you then gave us your informed consent to put you to death for treason. You wrote it down and signed it. Unsign it! Change your mind based upon this new knowledge. As life is proof? FOUR TIMES I DID ALL I COULD TO GET ARRESTED AND FOUR TIMES I WAS NOT. So far the Secret Service, FBI, local police and US Marshal has chosen their own life over yours. They have not chosen me but they have not chosen you either. We call that a draw in chess (This order? I have you in checkmate and you do not possess John Roberts option when in checkmate and he only gets to use that option once). They were waiting to see your ruling and order. I told you: The Navy wished me luck when I STOOD IT DOWN; THE NAVY SAID IF ANYONE CAN WE KNOW YOU, SUSAN, WILL. The Navy’s job is NOT to make it easy. Ideally they aren’t to go out of their way to harm me but hey, I reason the Navy acts in direct proportion to the actual, legal threat that I am to the old and now failed model. I quoted US law and case law and they told me WE ARE NOT AWARE A COUP HAS OCCURRED. I fact checked the Navy: did it know of Brown II? Yes. Did it know what this, reality of BVG and the upcoming Election 08, then constituted? No. Congressional Res. 511 did not exist then. I said, knowing the paper trail is well hidden and even nonexistent, I believe you as you might not be able to know. I’ll prove it by standing down the offices of Chief Justice and President. The Navy said, Good luck and if it is possible WE know you will. I told officer Bob M. of JAG: And when I do? Your name, Bob M., is at the top of my very, very short list. YOU not the Navy. I never spoke to THE Navy, the top person according to chain of command theory. I wrote to him in the form of an emergency application and petition in support of it as he is JOHN ROBERTS and he acted for me. Eisenhower warned me: He said, Beware of a Military-Industrial complex risign to power; it is your greatest danger Susan. He never used the word Susan only ‘you’ as in citizen: “This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State
house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society”, Speech, 1961. No longer controlled by civilians but by CORP US as Wilson retained his post as Commander in Chief and then Bush Jr. was installed. A coup several times over as BVG is too as is Obama. It is a coup by any name: of CORP US and privateers being made legal or made permanent as one can never, ever remove where campaign funding comes from and how it is done or that Obama announced DURING the process that he would use private funding after first agreeing to use only public funding so that the playing filed was obliterated. SCOTUS itself has heard 4 identical PAC cases as nobody has been able to make the WHOLE case correctly until I did. Souter even expressed the idea within a ruling that he was going to poke his eyes out with a fork if he had to deal with another SAME EXACT PAC CASE as the lawyers are missing it by a mile. Souter did not use those exact words but close to it as he expressed extreme frustration and boredom. See the lawyer who argued the Ten Commandments case, Erwin Chemerinsky, in “Constitutional Law Principals and Policies” as he noticed this too and thought it was important enough to note in this textbook. OVERTHROW BACKED BY A MILITARY WHO IS UNAWARE OF IT, AS IT WOULD NEVER EVER AGREE IF IT KNEW. See Bush memos Obama released indicating CORP US could and would give police military power or assume it themselves NOT as headed by a civilian but by the CORP US used against the citizens thus they hired lawyers to exploit the fact and law and US history along with human emotion against The People exactly as if The People are the enemy named in the Trading with Enemies Act ; See taxes collected via CORP US exerting what are military not police powers. If I can and did reason this and act in one direction – righteousness – then couldn’t this group of people or any one of these people reason this also but act in the opposite direction for or towards evil? YES! I knew to flee for my life as my legal problem went way beyond a NY County Court and so I fled directly to JOHN ROBERTS and SCOTUS as due to BVG, Rehnquist’s death and my actions Roberts ‘inherited’ Command of the Military as did I. I knew he must be informed : The event horizon has been realized. Our only choice now? Straight on ahead into the blue as you can, will and do escape a black hole if you are ethical by exiting on the other side. The fatal mistake of the past is made when people fight against the law at work or against the intrinsic force. You cannot fight the Constitution as it is originally written and win as that force? It is a law of this universe. This is an order to act or stand down as this is an actual life or death emergency and I am prepared to shoot to kill if you refuse to obey this order as it is firmly based upon fact and US law; it stands purely and absolutely or as wholly constitutional. You have a copy of the exact order. I delivered it to both Roberts and a local federal judge via first class mail. I then made an attempt to contact the Post Master General to hand deliver it. Either it is an actual life and death emergency or I am the greatest, most skilled story teller you have ever met. It’s all real, actual and current, an actual safety issue and history, or I deserve several academy awards and a Nobel Prize for literature. I lawfully and honorably discharged my sworn duties. I paid the highest price a person can ever pay. CORP US does not award women the Congressional Medal of Honor so the SCOTUS docket exactly naming “Conferenced” or hearing, and “11/20/08” or direct action, constitutes that for me. If CORP US forces lemons upon me? Lay low, wait until they are thoroughly rotten, aim for their heads and then RETURN FIRE! Ideally only one head must roll over and die. Military strategists and tactical experts – actual Commanders - understand this language, as it is military jargon not legal jargon. My hands are not bloody as I did all I could to stop this madness known as the current and recent past state of this nation. I am not “crazy” and I am not a “hysterical woman”. Hamilton would tell you that the word “hysterical” is overtly sexist and used to harm women only as men do not have uteri nor hysterectomies. The DOD lists this as the body count: 08/09, 10 AM: 3,465 Killed In Action and the DOJ lists: Violent acts against women, 2006: 2,649,050 not including homicide or violence against persons under 12; rape and child molestation is a form of murder (statistics and odds are not the same nor are samples of populations versus actual crimes nor are reported crimes versus actual crimes). US law is one of horizontal and vertical checks and balances. Vertical checks and balances have been ignored; our military has been abandoned and Clinton is at fault; any problem the military has can be directly traced to having the honor code and honor bond violated at the highest levels possible. Lawyers, like atheists, have proven they make for terrible and useless Commanders unless they have actual experience Commanding such as prior military service or the equivalent, motherhood. A mother is to know how to command as it is the job.
7. I told the SCOTUS clerks: You might have to take a hit for The Constitution thus The People. I told them: Do not concern yourselves with my words, as we know what actually happened as we lived it. If you are not guilty then I will not allow anyone to make that claim. I may but nobody else may. If it seems as if you are guilty? The only thing to do is say it out loud; make the accusation known or name what seems as if as then the accused has
an opportunity to destroy that idea if it is wrong or mistaken. If people suspect the court is crooked you want The People to know, to own the truth, one way or the other. If you do not say it out loud, write it down, then the People will always wonder and always suspect wrongdoing. They’ll manufacture falsehoods but truly believe them as fact w/o question as they are struggling to make sense of it all. If it’s an actual trust issue then you need to restore trust. An honest person can stand up to anything. If it is not true it goes away. If it seems to be discrimination name it. Did the clerks file 08-6622 or not? 07-9804 took seven months to file! 08-6622? One day. It went away so either it was going on in error or it was a mistake; it was not intentional. If it was intentional I’d still be trying to get in not back in, lol. My true belief? The clerks did not know something I incorrectly assumed everybody knew.
8. I did not need 20 pages but I took them. I need one sentence and thanks to the SG of the US I have it: On or around 03/22/08 the Solicitor General of the US waived your interest (the interest of the judges and clerks reading this) and waived your right, to vote, act as a judge or clerk, express your opinion on anything or to collect a salary and all of your rights (the rights of the judges and clerks reading this). The SG placed this in writing, singed it and sent it to SCOTUS. Legally via an offical decision made on your behalf you have no interest and no right as you made no objection and on August 3rd, 2009, upheld that waiver. SCOTUS served you notice twice, 07-9804 & 08-6622, and twice you failed to answer or to object in any way. SCOTUS gave you more than a fair and just opportunity, as our law is only one need exist. I, the case, never left SCOTUS only some of not all of the paper with my name printed on it did. Jurisdiction and issue did not magically change as our law did not nor did I quit and/or fail. The law is any actual power and authority you might come to have in this world? YOU GET IT FROM ME OR WE THE PEOPLE NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND! But first it is born of the Creator. You can and may give it away but not take it from me: You gave your power and authority away to me, SCOTUS and the People. You can and may do it, and should in this unique case, but you want to do it legally, with informed consent. So I wrote down the legal history. 9. I not once ever wanted to become President. I had higher aspirations: Supreme Court Justice. I was like a laser beam solely focused on that one institution and how to get in on my own, as I knew there was a door no person could see. Jesus told me he broke in for me. Jesus told me that he set a place for me. The Founders repeated this to me over and over. They fully admitted: The only proof we have is our own existence as an independent nation. You might fail us. Susan, you of all people cannot fail us! They did not say this exactly they said it with symbols or clues as they enshrined the truth of who and what they are as people all over the place – in letters, books, rulings, currency, maps, portraits, schools, flags, architecture, words etc. etc. You see a red, white and blue flag while I see, hear and feel “Abraham” and the promise God made that came true for him, then Washington and now me. You see a leaky ceiling where I see actual stars: Polaris and Orion. You see a building and a filing system while I see a living institution, the Library of Congress, with a plaque that makes me laugh: “Jefferson” as he created it with his own books, books that now bear a Library of Congress ‘code’ number. You see actual money where I see Hamilton’s face but I think SAFETY and feel, ‘This new multicolored junk looks like it came out of a monopoly game; it may as well have for it’s worthless’. Your reality is false; it is not my own as I learned to see past the physical world as the physical is all an illusion; physical things symbolize the truth. Physicists who are doing nothing more than searching for God told me exactly to check the pulse rate of the respiring universe. So I knew – you are ‘crazy’ as you are looking at THINGS and not considering the PEOPLE, or, HUMAN HEARTS. The truth of the Founders is their mind and human heart, still living. You can and do hear it and feel it if you listen. It’s the emotional result of their grand experiment that I knew to look for as you cannot see emotion but liberty and safety are emotions and are rights. They made us safe. You made me unsafe. I changed my awareness of the pulse rate of the respiring nation aka the People...I began to follow the First We The People or the Delaware Indians as their actual name means “We, the People” and then Jesus accidentally by design by following John Adams as I cannot hear, see or feel what I am way too close to, a body of belief known as “Thomas Jefferson”. I know they lock the door at night. I know the building is guarded. I know lawyers are hogging all the seats. That’s your reality, a fantasy in your head based upon past events and past failure to act not what is now as I acted as did Roberts. My reality? Lawyers acting as if they are hogs is against the spirit of the law. That was then this is now. I’m already in! No lock, guard or lawyer can or may keep me out as long as I act in my own defense and always have an answer for Roberts. Later I began defending The Founders as the name “Patriot Act” constitutes defamation of character as proven by those aforementioned “Bush” memos. Are these guys nuts to act upon the belief that
they can keep me, the product or culmination of all who came before me, out? That they can fine tune history to then pervert the law thus overthrow the People? Wakey, wakey! The Founders built it into the design: our law is designed to include you as when The Founders open a door and all 13 original states ratify it no modern federal judge or corporation can close it. If the door is not there? The tool to make the door is. And if that door is created, opened and so there it is w/o any lock but you do not know how to walk through it? Or people keep stopping you from entering? You have written and unwritten instructions! Copy a play out of the Founders book, which is their lives or if you prefer the Federalist Papers: Act, act as if you belong there and people will believe you do...or actually disguise yourself with math in the form of words not numbers and vice versa. By the time they recognize the truth of your argument in light of the facts and US law? It’s too late - you’re in! Or: Say you know how and then act, take that step, faking it all the way if you have to as life will eventually prove you wrong or right and the only real master you ever have is experience. Addicts call this faking it until you are making it – making US law and history that is! Fortunately for me I was born a legal prodigy. This nation does not recognize legal prodigies, as those in charge truly believe you cannot know something if an anointed authority keeps the knowledge from you. You do not understand “reasoning” is inborn and acquired. You, a lawyer, truly believe you have to learn the law in a law school or it is impossible as it is an ultraexclusive, closed club. Do musical prodigies need music lessons? No! I, like a genius musician, am born with this skill, a human quality and a human ability. How did that first black or Native lawyer, a SCOTUS case, come to be? They did it on their own, that’s how. You victimized them until they knew to then act in the opposite direction, as an opposing force against you, thus overcoming the made up barriers which exist in your mind and within your heart but not within US law. The other reason this nation lost out on me the prodigy and still does not recognize me as a genius? Stendhal told me: ALL WOMEN BORN GENIUSES ARE LOST TO THE PUBLIC GOOD. How is this good for the public??? It defies reason and our law, if not the sitting officers, is reasonable as reason is the very nature of its design. You know what else it is? Intention, as all of this is intentional. The Founders meant for me to happen! Conclusion Motion to reconsider granted so Susan's ruling is upheld: BLACK, CARNES and MARCUS are MOOT as they are guilty of treason. The death penalty may now be carried out IF and only IF they do not revoke the waiver of their rights by hearing this case in person or issuing an order AGAINST Obama, Roberts and the US (Sending it to SCOTUS) not against reason thus against our Constitution. NO OTHER CHOICES ARE CONSTITUTIONAL OR EVEN REMOTELY REASONABLE OR RATIONAL AND A FAILURE TO CHOOSE ONE OF THESE IS THEN TREASON IN THIS CASE. AN ORDER CITING RULE AND THE WORDS “DISMISSED” “MOOT” AND “ENTIRELY WITHOUT MERIT” CONSTITUTES A CRIMINAL ACT. It rises to treason as this bench now knows the facts of US history, BVG, Obama and the UN/IMF thus knows its own seats are only made legal or become constitutional, separate and apart from CORP US upon hearing this case in person or issuing a ruling against Obama and the US as in CORP US; it must read “Obama”, “US”, “defendant” and “unconstitutional” in a fashion that unequivocally states Obama, his facts and his actions such as purchasing the Executive seat when not qualified as he is a dual citizen or not a citizen at all (Obama himself admitted this openly; you saw that piece of evidence rising to proof from Obama’s own website as he did not hide this fact or any facts at first but only after The People began to protest and the paper written in 2006 by an Obama associate advocating the foreignization of the Office thus Obama’s installation was planned from at least as far back as that date), and that CORP US as it exists today is not legal and is repugnant thus void and so is the 08 election. It might read “Roberts” but it might not as like a bead sliding across an abacus this court can address Roberts injury as his rights have been violated and he was the victim of a crime as CORP US lied to his face about his appointment as he was used to make an attempt to corrupt (skew) the Supreme Court without any person ever knowing but that attempt failed miserably as like Earl Warren he acted against his victimization, not against me but for me and for himself, when I informed him of it and objected in his name and in SCOTUS’ name by turning him into a pro se plaintiff not a defendant thus ruling WITH HIM AND FOR WE THE PEOPLE. In this manner this bench rules itself to be NOT GUILTY OF TREASON BUT ONLY ACCOUNTABLE FOR ANY RESULTING PERSONAL INJURY TO SUSAN. A federal judge is to know: Automatically upon re-entry to SCOTUS this case becomes Herbert, pro se and or with Roberts, pro se or all pro se litigants against those who are not pro se, Obama and the US, as all citizens failed us when they failed to 18
reason their vote and Obama/Biden has a lawyer, Bob Bauer as does the CORP US, the Solicitor General. Bauer’s firm’s interests conflict with the People’s. See attached. The SG? Theirs does too as that is an office that represents CORP US thus HERBERT and ROBERTS then represent their own persons and WE, the People. I openly and directly challenged Roberts to prove to me, the authority, that he or one of his clerks is indeed a super legal genius of my and John Marshall’s caliber and is ethical. I demanded that he prove he is my equal as his appointment was not arbitrary and that he was acting in defense of The Constitution and so The People and not CORP US. As I can legally dissolve him via arguing arbitrarily Stevens and Ginsburg are next in line thus his appointment was meant to prevent a woman from ever becoming Chief thus keeping CORP US exclusively male for at least two more decades thus entrenching CORP US permanently, and I used the exact words of a persons within the Bush administration to prove this beyond any doubt, I openly challenged him and his clerks. I knew some of my injury was not deliberate but are these people fit to serve? Have they been injured beyond repair? I said in petitions, exhibits and letters as contacting a defendant is not ex parte communication nor is contacting the adversarial party, the US attorney as he is adversarial on paper only as he protects the class, The People, thus if I do too and if I am as able and capable as I claim I would then give him all of the knowledge he needs to do his job exactly as The Founders gave me all of the same tools they had (some words are exact): You bring out your biggest, baddest guns; you create the most impossible standard you can think of and I will meet or exceed it. I am willing to meet any burden and any standard you name no matter how strict or how impossible it seems to be as I know you must be certain - assured beyond any doubt – that I can and will make this case as the one thing you cannot do is let me begin only to fail in the final hour. I admit I did not expect Roberts to use the fabled SCOTUS “Cloak of Invisibility”: act but not file the paper. It was rumored to exist and I knew it did; would he use it? I did consider it but not seriously. It was a fleeting thought. When he or his clerk played that card? I got exactly what I deserved as I also said: Always arrive at the scene of battle with at least one secret weapon. What’s more secret than invisible? Think: the docket is never invisible; dates as in math will be visible. By its nature SCOTUS maintains a cloak of secrecy; combine secrecy with invisibility and you have the biggest baddest gun there is. I thought, This is chess! You can’t change the rules to get out of checkmate! Or can you? as the chessboard is also a checkerboard: KING ME! But not with a crown! I knew then: Now it sticks to the lawyers who did this to us (Roberts, SCOTUS, myself and The People of which this bench is) as the impossible standard created? Name Roberts exactly if you are able and willing and prove your case without asking to see Obama’s paper and without asking SCOTUS to violate it’s tradition of secrecy. This is where SCOTUS and I have always been in agreement as there is actual constitutional reasoning SCOTUS should maintain its secrecy and you may not ask for paper as proof in this type of case: It is as I said, “Can you ever trust the paper these unjust people generate?” Who trusts paper? Trust is an emotional relationship like liberty and safety. Paper feels no emotion nor returns any emotion. It cannot reason anything by itself and so has no will. Can and will paper act for you in an emergency? Trust, like love, is for people not paper. Trust CORP US? CORP US is now and always was flagrantly disrespecting The Constitution and they flaunt it openly. It is one of the most dangerous precedents of all that any nation can ever set: persons upon every level ignoring the law including the Executive, the very persons charged with the duty to enforce the law. It is not possible to enforce the law while entering the office in violation of it nor while continuing to violate it once installed in that office. The first thing Obama would have to do to then make his election legal? RESIGN as then he’d be enforcing the Constitution. That is the only way he could then turn around, enter SCOTUS and make his case to then certify his election as legal as the argument to do so exists and his resignation is then serves as proof he was not willing to obey an unconstitutional order issued by The People let alone CORP US. I have weighed the evidence: Super legal geniuses? Obama and Bauer?! Not! but Roberts (or his clerk) has proven his genius and willingness so he can and may represent himself and the People with me or sit as Chief Justice. The US Attorney? He then represents the interests of the class: WE, the People including Roberts, Herbert, Black, Carnes and Marcus. We are on the side of the Constitution and The Founders. Black, Carnes and Marcus are supposed to be on that same side. By their very design federal judges and so all citizens are to be intentionally constitutional and of good behavior. Federalist 78, Hamilton: “To avoid an arbitrary discretion in the courts, it is indispensable that they should be bound down by strict rules and precedents, which serve to define and point out their duty in every particular case that comes before them;...controversies...grow out of the folly and wickedness of mankind,...and ...demand long and laborious study to acquire a competent knowledge of them...there can 19
be but few men in the society who will have sufficient skill in the laws to qualify them for the stations of judges...making the proper deductions for the ordinary depravity of human nature, the number must be still smaller of those who unite the requisite integrity with the requisite knowledge...Upon the whole, there can be no room to doubt that the convention acted wisely in copying from the models of those constitutions which have established good behavior as the tenure of their judicial offices...” Good behavior? Today we live in a nation whereby a judge is shot for issuing a valid order or even most sinful of all her husband is shot as the perpetrator knows if he shoots her husband he might not be subject to the death penalty but if he shoots and kills a federal judge? Treason thus he is subject to the death penalty and a licensed lawyer taught him the difference as that is the kind of work lawyers are producing in 2009 and for pay. Until or unless a natural born lawyer became willing to say whatever it took to then rip these exact judges out of their exact seats – a comfort zone - so the judges then could see themselves and see the problem – PROTECTION OF THE LAW and LAWYERS corrupting it to their personal advantage with deliberation so it no longer exists for the People in actual reality but only on paper – these judges had a blind spot they could not overcome. Roberts and I undid that blindfold as it is earplugs and a gag not an actual blindfold thus I, if I sat as a judge, would eagerly accept the opportunity placed before me: We, the People need a patron saint; why not you? You are to examine and weigh US fact or history, and US law or the Constitution and US case law, and not examine and weigh my fact – the facts of my life story - or my personal beliefs. I can and will express any personal belief or idea I wish as it is true for me and a fact of me or in protest; I can go on and on about my life. I can and will reason and decide that Roberts is a jerk, a joke or a legal genius. He can then agree or disagree or counter sue me. I’m the judge of my legal relationship with Roberts or any other named person or entity. What Roberts and I lived? You were not there, were you? What WE lived as a nation? You were present for that; you were there for that. You’re here now. You are to extrapolate US fact and US law; you are to discern what facts of my life are pertinent but you are never, ever to pass judgment on Susan the person or assume she is lying. The legal assumption is I am telling the truth. To dismiss my suit out of hand or to judge me is to then claim that 200 years of American history were not lived and never happened; that all of those people never lived and never died. It is to say that everything our Founders did was for nothing. Perhaps you should judge if you are or are not a good enough reason, or, if having to do it over again would the Founders act for who and what you are? BLACK, CARNES and MARCUS in the form of this order do not constitute US law at work but their own whim and will or their personal prejudices and fears at work. This ruling of my own in the form of a motion to reconsider constitutes an arrest warrant upon a charge of treason as well as other, lesser acts of sedition and subversion as well as at least one count of perjury. Any citizen may issue or order of arrest which is why we call it citizens arrest but in this case? I have the legal power and moral authority to issue an actual paper binding and valid arrest warrant as I am charged with the duty to enforce the law according to our Constitution and as supported by John Roberts action. It remains an arrest warrant until or unless it becomes a new decision, ruling and order that is based upon our law and is made in consideration of all of the facts and is on behalf the People and not CORP US. ENTERED AND ORDERED AUGUST 7th, 2009. Susan Herbert, The acting, legal President and Commander in Chief as I am, as my will, my reasoning, my one vote, the equal protection and due process clauses and Marbury make it so
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue listening from where you left off, or restart the preview.