Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DNV RP-F113 Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles Inspection Maintenance and Repair of Deepwater Pipelines
Ian Nash
Introduction
Requirements for pipeline inspection: what, when and how Pipeline maintenance and routine inspection Pipeline damage during installation and operation in deepwater, causes and effects Understanding the risks and potential need for repair Repair systems & tools
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
Ian Nash
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
Ian Nash
Ambient external pressures are high, commonly similar to internal operational pressures } Coating and Insulation Degradation
High levels of Insulation are commonly required } Insulation Degradation
All inspection, maintenance and Waters are typically cold approx 4C6C } CP, Flow Assurance, Materials
Pipelines tend not to be protected by a concrete coating } Damage
Geohazards can be significant } Spanning, Buckling, Damage, Bend Stability, Turbitity and Debris flows Slugging within produced fluids is common } Spanning, Fatigue Greater tolerances Survey inaccuracy, installation accuracy Metocean and environmental conditions tend to be benign } Stability Seabed mobility is less dominant } Scour, Spanning
Ian Nash
BASELINE SURVEY
The ongoing assessment of inspection findings will involve comparison of data with that recorded during previous inspection campaigns. This will allow trends to be extrapolated and judgments made regarding the urgency of remedial action. This process necessarily commences with the acquisition of the measurement of internally and externally taken values at the commencement of pipeline service, known as a Baseline Survey.
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
Ian Nash
Routine inspections may indicate a requirement for more specific investigations involving detailed or specialist techniques.
The normal physical inspection tasks undertaken on the Deepwater Pipelines can be split into locations internal and external to the pipeline. Internal and External locations are typically periodically inspected by Pigging and Remote Vehicle methods respectively. Permanent monitoring methods also exist and are becoming more commonplace.
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
Ian Nash
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
Ian Nash
INSPECTION METHODS
Location Method Technique
Magnetic Flux Ultrasonic Pigging Internal Visual Calliper Geometry (XYZ) Corrosion Probe/Spool Sand Probe Visual Geometry XYZ Inspection ROV Burial Acoustic CP Probe Weld Scanner Tomography Scanning Side Scan Visual AUV Geometry (XYZ) Sidescan Permanent Monitoring
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
Defects
Spanning/Burial Corrosion Dents Gouges leak CP Failure Coating Damage Hydrate Movement Buckle Vibration Cracking Fatigue Protection Integrity (mattresses/ Rock/Covers)
Permanent Monitoring
External
Vibration Strain
Ian Nash
Movement
Protection Integrity
CP Failure
Corrosion
Vibration
Pigging
Internal Permanent Monitoring
Magnetic Flux Ultrasonic Visual Calliper Geometry (XYZ) Corrosion Probe Sand Probe Visual Acoustic CP Probe Weld Scanner Tomography Side Scan Visual Acoustic Sidescan Vibration Strain
Inspection Maintenance and Repair of Deepwater Pipelines
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
leak
Location
Method
Technique
Cracking 9
Coating Damage
Hydrate
Erosion
Gouges
Ian Nash
Buckle
Dents
DNV RP-F116 (Sec H1) The risk assessment comprises the following main tasks;
Consequence of Failure
c) Data gathering
d) Data quality review e) Estimate probability of failure (PoF) f) Estimate consequences of failure (CoF) g) Determine risk h) Identify risk mitigating measures i) All equipment threats have considered j) Determine aggregated risk k) Planning of inspection, monitoring and testing activities
Risk Factor
Risk OK?
Inspection Scheme
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
10
Ian Nash
Targeted Inspections
Design Dossier Defect Type1 Code Requirements
Defect Type 3 Defect Type 4 Review design Review previous inspections Defect Type 5 Defect Type 6 Prepare & Perform Targeted Inspection
Record Results No Defect observed? Yes Assess Defect & Determine Correction
Stop
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
Inspection Records
Defect selected
Defect Type 2
11
Ian Nash
Pig Inspection of offshore pipelines tends to look for internal problems. Generally running pigs in offshore pipelines is very similar to running in onshore lines, after the wall thickness and higher pressures are taken in to consideration. The most favoured inspection methods are either ultrasonic or magnetic flux inspection. Magnetic flux is limited by magnet strength, ie get enough magnetism in the wall of the pipe to enable good results to be obtained. Ultrasonic can inspect very thick wall pipe but Ultrasonic's have to be run in a liquid medium. The main difference between offshore and onshore is the length of run between pig traps, as Offshore pipelines tend not to have intermediate compression stations with conveniently located pig traps. The pig must not get stuck in the pipeline as retrieving it will be much more expensive than from an onshore pipeline. The pig must stay alive and recording data (battery duration may be an issue)
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles Inspection Maintenance and Repair of Deepwater Pipelines
12
Ian Nash
Traditionally, external inspection, of deepwater pipelines is performed using work ROVs deployed from DP ROV support vessels. These vessels are expensive, and they may not be available when they are needed most. In deep waters, ROVs become heavy to handle from these vessels, because of long umbilicals; and they become prone to breakdowns. ROV inspections of long transmission lines can be very slow and may take many months to complete end to end Weather downtime is also an issue for ROV support vessels when working in harsh and hostile environments
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
13
Ian Nash
Large DPII vessels with high-end ROV spreads would no longer be required for simple inspection.
AUVs have demonstrated solid performance requiring simple autonomy for missions such as bathymetric survey and high resolution sonar imaging
AUVs can be deployed from small utility vessels, be capable of operations in higher seas, without the operational limitations and equipment hazards imposed by umbilical and tether management systems.
In the future AUVs would become field resident, residing in the subsea field for periods of months.
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
14
Ian Nash
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
15
Ian Nash
An optimum IMR plan aims to strike an appropriate balance between the following objectives: maximising the availability of the pipeline system during its operating life by maintaining and preserving its integrity, thus maximising revenue; minimising inspection, intervention and rectification measures through the life of the pipeline system, thus minimising through-life IMR related costs. reducing to as low as is reasonably practicable all risks to people, the environment and assets, in accordance with legislative, societal and business requirements, thus minimising the costs of failures.
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
16
Ian Nash
Phase 3 Phase 1
Failure rate
Phase 2
Time
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
17
Ian Nash
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
18
Ian Nash
Inspection Planning
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
19
Ian Nash
Inspection Planning
APPENDIX G EXAMPLE - RISK ASSESSMENT AND IM PLANNING
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
20
Ian Nash
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
21
Ian Nash
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
22
Ian Nash
Type of Inspection
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Intelligent Pig
Visual including CP and Side Scan Towed Acoustic Side Scan Sonar 2) Targeted Special Events ? ? ?
1) Reduction in annual inspection applies to remote subsea pipelines only 2) Acoustic side scan sonar is not always cost effective especially in deepwater or where there are strong currents. An ROV survey with reduced scope could be considered 3) the third phase may not occur within normal project lifetimes, i.e. the Phase 2 (plateau phase) extends for several decades with well designed, operated and maintained facilities.
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles Inspection Maintenance and Repair of Deepwater Pipelines
23
Ian Nash
Pipeline Maintenance
Preventive maintenance Because of the high cost and potential delays associated with intervention, preventive maintenance should be eliminated at the design stage, wherever possible. Routine maintenance Routine maintenance tasks are required where the elimination of specific intervention is uneconomic or technically problematic. Normally such maintenance would be undertaken during repair activity, or combined with planned inspection campaigns. Corrective Maintenance Intervention to rectify breakdown or degradation (Corrective Maintenance) is referred to as Repair. Normally Subsea Facilities shall possess sufficient reliability to ensure availability throughout the field life. Subsea equipment that is susceptible to failure should be designed to minimize the effort/cost required for replacement of the failed assembly.
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles Inspection Maintenance and Repair of Deepwater Pipelines
24
Ian Nash
Pipeline damage during installation and operation in deepwater, causes and effects
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
25
Ian Nash
Dropped
from
Installation Tension failure Station Keeping Geohazards Slope Stability Route Features Rock Outcrops, Cement Soil, Shell and Coral Banks. Pockmarks
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
Damage to pipeline geometry and/or pipe wall: Gouges, Grooves and Notches. Dents Wet and Dry Buckles. Overstressing or Excessive Bending. Fatigue Damage. Bend Pull Out
coating): Lost & Damaged weight coating Damaged corrosion coating Lost & Damaged insulation coating Anode Damage: Lost anode Disconnected anode
Inspection Maintenance and Repair of Deepwater Pipelines
26
Ian Nash
Ships Ship sinking Ship Grounding Shipwrecks and Debris Material and Construction Defects Sabotage Military Action
from
Coral Banks. Shallow Gas and Seepage of Gas and Fluids Pockmarks Mud Diapirs and Mud Volcanoes Slope Instability Mass Movements
27
Ian Nash
pipe wall: Rupture. Internal Corrosion. External Corrosion. Pinhole Leak. Gouges, Grooves and Notches. Cracks and Fracture Propagation. Dents and Buckles. Overstressing or Excessive Bending. Fatigue Damage.
coating): Lost & Damaged weight coating Damaged corrosion coating Lost & Damaged insulation coating Anode Damage: Lost anode Disconnected anode Over consumption Anode pasivity Hydrate Formation: Pinhole Leak. Lost & Damaged insulation coating Incorrect operation
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
28
Ian Nash
Based on the damage scenarios and risk assessment it is clear that: The pipeline installation contractor should have fully developed procedures and all necessary equipment mobilised and ready for implementation in the event of dry or wet buckles, prior to the start of deepwater pipelay operations.
The operator should have fully developed procedures and all necessary
equipment ready for implementation prior to the start of operations, to cater for the following scenarios:
Hydrate formation. Localised damage (i.e. dent or pinhole leak). Local Rupture. Rupture over extensive pipeline length.
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
29
Ian Nash
MEIDP Example
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
30
Ian Nash
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
31
Ian Nash
Intervention Zones
Based on this preliminary information, the route has been divided into five different intervention requirement zones. 1) Shallow Water Zone (0 to 150m WD) 2) Continental Slope Zone (150m to 2500m WD) 3) Deep Water Section (2500m to 3500m WD) 4) Remote Seamount Section (300m to 3000m WD) 5) Indus Fan Section (2500m to 3000m WD)
Slope
Abyssal Plain
Slope
Rise
Rise
Abyssal Plain
Qualhat Seamou nt
Abyssal Plain
Shelf
4 3
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
32
Ian Nash
MEIDP QRA Risk Contributors and % contribution Ship sinking (40.24%) Objects dropped from ships (19.91%) Ship grounding (14.07%) Material and construction defects (11.17%) External corrosion (10.62%) Anchoring (3.23%) Internal corrosion (0.63%) Trawling (0.12%)
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
33
Ian Nash
4.00E-03 2.00E-03
1.50E-03 3.00E-03 1.00E-03 2.00E-03 5.00E-04 1.00E-03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
Material and construction defects External corrosion Material and construction defects Internal corrosion External corrosion ShipInternal grounding corrosion ShipDropped sinking objects Dropped objects Anchoring Anchoring Trawling Trawling
Abys sal Plain North Murray Ridge Dalrym ple Trough South Murray Ridge
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
R is e Sl o p e
Rise
Abyssal Plain
Qualhat Seamou nt
Abyssal Plain
Shelf
Sl o p e
34
Ian Nash
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
35
Ian Nash
Help is at Hand
This Recommended Practice (RP) is intended to provide criteria and guidelines for the qualification of fittings and systems used for pipeline subsea repair and/or modifications and tie-ins.
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
36
Ian Nash
37
Ian Nash
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
38
Ian Nash
Intelligent pigging is the primary form of internal inspection ROV are the primary tool for performing external inspection
The development of AUVs for flypast inspections may give benefits deepwater by
Risk Based methods have been established for determining Inspection regimes (DnV
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
39
Ian Nash
Damage scenarios during installations and operation pose differing levels of risk.
The most significant potential damage scenarios during the installation phase are
damage (i.e. buckles) are a direct extension of techniques used for similar events in shallow water, and currently exists with installation contractors and specialist equipment suppliers.
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
40
Ian Nash
Several potential damage scenarios exist during the operational phase. The most
significant are where a damaged section of pipeline needs to be reinforced, replaced or cleared of a hydrate blockage. Where a replacement pipeline section is required, the length could vary significantly depending on the nature of the event causing the damage (a few meters to several kilometres in the event of a geohazard (i.e. slope instability). There is a wide range of qualified or nearly qualified equipment for the subsea repair, both currently available and under continual development. The equipment exists both as individual components (equipment, tools and fittings) and full systems. Some repair systems are owned and operated on a club basis, by a group or consortia of pipeline operators. The clubs at present operate in specific geographical locations. The need to access the pipeline at both ends for the purpose of re-commissioning (i.e. flooding, cleaning, dewatering, etc.), is inherent in many of the repair scenarios. Access facilities and the provision of adequate space for equipment (particularly dewatering) are significant.
Inspection Maintenance and Repair of Deepwater Pipelines
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
41
Ian Nash
References
I Nash & P Roberts OPT 2011, MEIDP The Deepwater Gas Route to India, February
23-24, I Nash & P Roberts DUDPC 2011, Case Study: MEIDP Installation, intervention and Repair, Sept 27-28 Peritus International, 18001.01-REP-IIDP-Y-0014 MEIDP, Emergency Pipeline Repair Systems, Aug 2011 Peritus International, 18001.01-REP-IIDP-Y-0007 MEIDP Quantified Risk Assessment Update, Dec 2010 Dan McLeod, Emerging Capabilities for Autonomous Inspection Repair and Maintenance, OCEANS 2010 (ART) DNV RP-F116 Integrity Management of Submarine Pipeline Systems DNV RP-F113 Subsea Pipeline Repair
Deep and Ultra-deepwater Pipelines Conference 27 - 28 September 2011, Novotel Paris Les Halles
42
Ian Nash