You are on page 1of 6

On Habermas

Most classical epistemological problems are really problems concerning this deontic status justification for believing, or more generally, entitlement to believe. Robert Brandom, Making It Explicit, p.201.

Referencias Bibliogrficas

Aboulafia, M.; Bookman, M.; Kemp, K. (edits.), 2002, Habermas and Pragmatism, New York: Routledge. Anani, H., 2013, Gettier Cases against Gettier Cases, trabajo no publicado, Faculty of Sociology, University of Ifsbahan, Irn. Apel, K. O., 1985, La Transformacin de la Filosofa , Tomo II, (versin castellana de Adela Cortina, Joaqun Chamorro y Jess Conill) Madrid: Taurus Ediciones. Brandom, R. B., 2001, Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Calabria, R., 2012, Notas sobre los casos Gettier y cuasi-Gettier, en Carlos E. Caorsi, Ricardo Navia y Pablo Melogno (Comps.), Actas del 1 Congreso de la Sociedad Filosfica del Uruguay, Montevideo: Sociedad Filosfica del Uruguay. 304-315. https://app.box.com/s/xju1glihs29va8b3b0jd Chisholm, R. M., 1983, The Foundations of Knowing, Mineapolis: The University of Minnesota Press. Cohen, S., 2011, The Gettier Problem in informed consent, Journal of Medical Ethics, 37:642645. Corlett, J. A., 1996, Analyzing Social Knowledge, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, p. 95, citado en Jenkins (2011:51-52). Creath, R., 1992, Induction and the Gettier Problem, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52(2): 401-404. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2107943 Gettier, E. L., 1963, Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?, Analysis, 23(6):121-123. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3326922 Gilbert Galassi, J., 2008, Una discusin en torno a la verdad en ciencias y humanidades, Alpha 26:217-232. http://www.scielo.cl/pdf/alpha/n26/art14.pdf Habermas, J., 2003, Truth and justification, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Habermas, J., 2002, Verdad y justificacin, Madrid: Editorial Trotta. Habermas, J., 1990, Conocimiento e inters, Madrid: Taurus Ediciones. Ingram, D., 2010, Habermas: Introduction and Analysis, Ithaca (US):Cornell University Press. Jenkins, M., 2011, The origin of the 'Gettier' problem: Socrates an The Theaetetus, Logos & Episteme II(1):51-66. Kertscher, J., 2009, Sense of Ethics and Ethical Sense, en Ulrich Arnswald (edit.), 2009, In Search of Meaning: Ludwig Wittgenstein on Ethics, Mysticism and Religion, Karlsruhe: Universittsverlag Karlsruhe, 87-111. Kripke, S., 1995, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Lafont, C., 1997, Universalismo y pluralismo en la tica del discurso, Isegoria 37:37-58. Navia, R., 2012, En torno a la polmica Habermas-Putnam sobre la validez racional de los juicios ticos y morales, Dissertatio 35:1130.

juicios ticos y morales, Dissertatio http://www.ufpel.edu.br/isp/dissertatio/revistas/35/01.pdf

35:11-

30.

Navia, R., 2008, Richard Rorty: Emplazamiento a la tradicin filosfica, Montevideo: UDELARCSIC. Navia, R., 2005, Primer anlisis del problema de la fundamentacin ltima filosfica en K. O. A p e l , Philsophos 10(1):97-11. http://www.revistas.ufg.br/index.php/philosophos/article/view/3233/3215#.Ul1lGtIz3v0 Pardo, M. S., 2010, The Gettier Problem and Legal Proof, Legal Theory 16(1):37-57. Pritchard, D., 2006, What is this thing called knowledge?, Oxon: Routledge. Sarmiento Reyes, J. C., 2011, Conocer: una visin epistmica, Acta Ecuatoriana de Psicologa 14(1):81-97. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/acp/v14n1/v14n1a08.pdf Steinhoff, U., 2009, The Philosophy of Jrgen Habermas, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Vega Encabo, J., 2008, Epistemic merit, autonomy, and testimony, Theoria 23(1):45-56. http://www.ehu.es/ojs/index.php/THEORIA/article/view/5/428 Vega Encabo, J., 2001, Reglas, medios, habilidades. Debates en torno al analisis de 'S sabe como hacer X', CRTICA, Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofia 33(98):3-40. Weiss, B.; Wanderer, B. (edits.), 2010, Reading Brandom: on making it explicit. London: Routledge. Zagzebski, L. T., 1994, The Inescapability of Gettier Problems, The Philosophical Quarterly, 44(174):65-73. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2220147.