## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Answer: A two-way ANOVA is a hypothesis test that includes two nominal independent variables and a scale dependent variable. 12-3. In your own words, define the word cell, first as you would use it in everyday conversation and then as a statistician would use it Answer: In everyday conversation the word cell conjures up images of a prison or a small room in which someone is forced to stay, or of one of the building blocks of a plant or animal. In statistics, the word cell refers to a single condition in a factorial ANOVA that is characterized by its values on each of the independent variables. 12-5. What is the difference in information provided when we say two-way ANOVA versus 2 × 3 ANOVA Answer: A two-way ANOVA has two independent variables. When we express that as a 2 X 3 ANOVA, we get added detail; the first number tells us that the first independent variable has two levels, and the second number tells us that the other independent variable has three levels. 12-7. What is a marginal mean? Answer: A marginal mean is the mean of a row or a column in a table that shows the cells of a study with a two-way ANOVA design. 12-9. How do bar graphs help us identify and interpret interactions? Explain how the addition of lines to the bar graph can help. Answer: Bar graphs allow us to visually depict the relative changes across the different levels of each independent variable. By adding lines that connect the bars within each series, we can assess whether the lines appear parallel, significantly different from parallel, or intersecting. Intersecting and significantly unparallel lines are indications of interactions. 12-11. In step 6 of our hypothesis testing for a two-way between-groups ANOVA, we make a decision for each F statistic. What are the three possible outcomes with respect to the overall pattern of results? Answer: First, we may be able to reject the null hypothesis for the interaction. (If the interaction is statistically significant, then it might not matter whether the main effects are significant; if they also are significant, then those findings are usually qualified by the interaction and they are not described separately. The overall pattern of cell means can tell the whole story.) Second, if we are not able to reject the null hypothesis for the interaction, then we focus on any significant main effects, drawing a specific directional conclusion for each. Third, if we do not reject the null hypothesis for either main effect or the interaction, then we can only conclude that there is insufficient evidence from this study to support our research hypotheses. 12-13. Define the terms in the following formula: SSinteraction = SStotal + (SSrows + SScolumns + SSwithin). Answer: This is the formula for the between-groups sum of squares for the interaction; we can calculate this by subtracting the other between-groups sums of squares (those for the two main effects) and the within-groups sum of squares

from the total sum of squares. (The between-groups sum of squares for the interaction is essentially what is left over when the main effects are accounted for.) Calculating the Statistic 12-15. Identify the factors and their levels in the following research designs: a. Men’s and women’s enjoyment of two different sporting events are compared using a 20 -point enjoyment scale. b. The amount of underage drinking, as documented in formal incident reports, is compared at ―dry‖ college campuses (no alcohol at all regardless of age) and ―wet‖ campuses (those that enforce the legal age for possession of alcohol). Three different types of colleges are considered: state institutions, private schools, and schools with a religious affiliation. c. The extent of contact with juvenile authorities is compared for youth across three age groups, considering both gender and family composition (two-parent family, single-parent, or no identified authority figure). Answer: a. There are two independent variables or factors: gender and sporting event. Gender has two levels, male and female, and sporting event has two levels. b. Type of campus is one factor that has two levels, dry or wet. The second factor is type of college, which has three levels, including state, private, and religious. c. Age group is the first factor, with three levels; gender is a second factor, with two levels; and family composition is the last factor, with three levels. 12-17. For the following data, calculate cell and marginal

Answer:

12-19. Draw a bar chart for the data presented in Exercise 12-17.

Answer:

Within-groups sum of squares e.01. Between-groups sum of squares for the independent variable gender c. calculate each sum of squares: a. Also indicate the critical value for an ANOVA based on each set of degrees of freedom. 12-23.12-21. Sum of squares for the interaction . Using the data provided in Exercise 12-17. Between-groups sum of squares for the independent variable sporting event d.H + dfM. Total sum of squares b. Calculate the five different measures of degrees of freedom for the data presented in Exercise 12-17. Answer: dfrows(gender) = Nrows – 1 = 2 – 1 = 1 dfcolumns(sport) = Ncolumns – 1 = 2 – 1 = 1 dfinteraction = (dfrows)(dfcolumns) = (1)(1) = 1 dfwithin = dfM.S + dfW.01. at a p level of 0.33. assuming the p level is 0. is 9.H + dfW.S = 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 = 12 dftotal = Ntotal – 1 = 16 – 1 = 15 We can also check that this answer is correct by adding all of the other degrees of freedom together: 1 + 1 + 1 + 12 = 15 The critical value for an F distribution with 1 and 12 degrees of freedom.

GM = 11.313. Sum of squares for gender: SSbetween(rows) = Σ(Mrow – GM)2 for each score = 0.438 b. SStotal = Σ(X – GM)2 for each score = 475.Answer: a.560 .

c. Sum of squares for sporting event: SSbetween(columns) = Σ(Mcolumn – GM)2 for each score = 280.560 .

d. SSwithin = Σ(X – Mcell)2 for each score = 126.256 .

e. SSgender x . We subtract all other sources from the total sum of squares. The sum of squares for the interaction is found through subtraction. and the remaining amount is the sum of squares for the interaction.

Using your work in Exercises 12-21 and 12-23. . create a source table. Answer: 12-27. compute R2 values for each effect.256) = 68.438 – (0. fill in the missing values in the table shown here: Answer: 12-29. Using what you know about the expanded source table. explain what these values mean.560 + 126.062 12-25.sport = SStotal – (SSgender + SSsport + SSwithin) SSgender x sport = 475. Using Cohen’s conventions.560 + 280. Using the information in the source table provided here.

this is smaller than a small effect size. What could the researcher do to redesign this study so it would be analyzed with a two-way between-groups ANOVA? Be specific.) b. and wore nametags throughout the group activity (two introductions and nametags). What could the researcher do to redesign this study so it would be analyzed with a two-way within-groups ANOVA? Be specific. (Note: There are several possible ways that the researcher could do this. a cognitive psychologist studied memory for names after a group activity that lasted 20 minutes. a. For the main effect B: According to Cohen’s conventions. (Note: There are several possible ways the researcher could do this.) . this is approaching a medium effect size. The researcher randomly assigned 120 participants to one of three conditions: (1) group members introduced themselves once (one introduction only). and (3) group members were introduced by the experimenter and themselves. For the interaction: According to Cohen’s conventions. Applying the Concepts 12-31.Answer: For the main effect A: According to Cohen’s conventions. this is approaching a medium effect size. (2) group members were introduced by the experimenter and by themselves (two introductions). In a fictional study.

The levels for this second independent variable would be that participants are told of the upcoming memory test or that participants are not told of the upcoming memory test.Answer: a. 1992). The second independent variable is the timing of the recording of participants’ perceptions of the accuracy of the TAA test. 12-33. the researcher could also assess whether participants remembered names differently depending on whether the group members were of the same gender as or a different gender from the participant. State the dependent variable. This would be a within-groups manipulation because every participant would be exposed to members who were of the same gender as the participant and those who were of a different gender from the participant. e. Answer: a. c. d. Participants were randomly assigned to be told either that high levels of TAA had potentially unhealthy consequences or that high levels of TAA had potentially healthy consequences. There are many possible answers to this question. Draw a table that depicts the cells of this ANOVA. the researcher could also assess whether having a prior knowledge that they will be tested on their group members’ names affects memory. The dependent measure assessed their perception of the accuracy of the TAA test on a scale of 1 (very inaccurate) to 9 (very accurate). There would be 4 cells in this research design. More precisely. In addition to using how they were introduced as the independent variable. If the researcher randomly assigned participants to the different treatment conditions. One independent variable is what participants were told regarding the consequences of high TAA. d. What kind of ANOVA would be used to analyze these data? State the name using the original language as well as the more specific language. The dependent variable is the participants’ perceptions of the accuracy of the TAA test on the 1–9-point scale. this study would require a twoway between-groups ANOVA. They were also randomly assigned to complete a dependent measure before or after the TAA test. State the independent variables and their levels. b. a 2 x2 ANOVA would be used. In addition to using how they were introduced as the independent variable. Ninety-three participants completed a fictitious medical test that told them they had high levels of a certain enzyme. This number is obtained by multiplying the number of levels of each independent variable (2 x 2). Its levels are before taking the TAA test and after taking the TAA test. TAA. There are many possible answers to this question. There are two independent variables. a. A two-way between-groups ANOVA would be used to analyze these data. b. Use the more specific language of ANOVA to calculate the number of cells in this research design. . Its levels are unhealthy consequences and healthy consequences. A study on motivated skepticism examined whether participants were more likely to be skeptical when it served their self-interest (Ditto & Lopez. c. b.

12-35. Draw a bar graph that depicts the pattern that includes the new cell mean. d. b. Note: There are several cell means that would work. . 4. a. b. Answer: a. c. Draw a bar graph depicting the pattern that includes the new cell mean.2: c. Change the cell mean for the participants who had a healthy test outcome and who completed the dependent measure prior to the TAA test so that this is now a quantitative interaction. Consider again the study discussed in Exercises 12-33 and 12-34. Change the cell mean for the participants who had a healthy test outcome and who completed the dependent measure prior to the TAA test so that there is now no interaction. Bar graph of the quantitative interaction with the new cell mean.

Draw a bar graph that depicts the pattern that includes the new cell means. Note: There are several cell means that would work. 4. d. Bar graph including the new cell mean. Draw a bar graph that depicts the pattern that includes the new cell means. Consider again the study in Exercise 12-36. c. Change the cell means for the conservative participants who read about an African American officer so that this is now a quantitative interaction. Change the cell means for the moderate and conservative participants who read about an African American officer so that there is now no interaction.2: 12-37.d. b. Bar graph depicting the quantitative interaction that results from including the new cell mean. b. a. Answer: a. 5.90: .

89: . 4.60 and 5.c. d. Bar graph depicting the absence of an interaction that results from the two new cell means.

12-39. b. Answer: a. c. a. interaction. b. but change the means for male participants told that the illness affects mostly women so that there is now a quantitative. but change the means for male participants told that the illness affects mostly women so that there is no interaction. Note: There are several cell means that would work. Draw a new table of cells. Draw a bar graph that represents the means in part (a). Consider the interaction described in Exercise 12-38. . Draw a bar graph that represents the means in part (c). Bar graph for the means: c. Draw a new table of cells. d. rather than a qualitative.

3. in a fraternity or sorority). What are the independent variables and their levels? What is the dependent variable? b. and its levels are member and nonmember.9 Women not in a sorority: 3.0 Women in a sorority: 3.e. c.4.1. Draw a bar graph for all significant effects. and stated whether they were in the university’s Greek system (i. Answer: a.6. and indicate whether it is a qualitative or a quantitative interaction.4.2.. Is there a significant interaction? If yes. 3.9.d. Explain. Bar graph for the new means: 12-41. The second independent variable is membership in the Greek system.0. The first independent variable is the gender of the student. 3. 3. and its levels are men and women. 3. 2. Include the cell means. 3. Conduct all six steps of hypothesis testing.0. describe it in words.7.1.1 a. e. indicated their genders. 2. Following are the GPAs for the different groups of students: Men in a fraternity: 2.9. 2. d.0 Men not in a fraternity: 3. 3. A sample of students from our statistics classes reported their GPAs. 3. 2. The dependent . 3.4. Draw a table that lists the cells of the study design.0.

Assumptions: The data are not from random samples. c. member) is women who are members of a sorority.401 SScolumn(gender) = Σ(Mcolumn(gender) – GM)2 = 0.M + dfNG.115) is much larger than the smallest variance (0.828 . The homogeneity of variance assumption is violated because the largest variance (0. Population 4 (women.67 Step 5: SStotal = Σ(X – GM)2 = 1. so we must generalize with caution.M + dfG.W = 3 + 4 + 3 + 3 = 13 Main effect of gender: F distribution with 1 and 13 degrees of freedom Main effect of Greek membership: F distribution with 1 and 13 degrees of freedom Interaction of membership and gender: F distribution with 1 and 13 degrees of freedom Step 4: Cutoff F for main effect of gender: 4. Interaction: Greek membership x gender: Null hypothesis: The effect of Greek membership does not depend on gender. Research hypothesis: On average.W + dfNG. nonmember) is men who are not members of a fraternity. Population 2 (men. Research hypothesis: On average. men and women have the same GPAs—μM = μW. Step 1: Population 1 (men. Population 3(women.67 Cutoff F for main effect of Greek membership: 4. member) is men who are members of a fraternity. Research hypothesis: The effect of Greek membership does depend on gender.67 Cutoff F for interaction of gender and membership: 4.variable is GPA. men and women have different GPAs —μM ≠ μW. Main effect of second independent variable—gender: Null hypothesis: On average. students who are members in Greek organizations will have the same GPAs as students who are not in Greek organizations—μG = μNG.348 SSrow(Greek) = Σ(Mrow(Greek) – GM)2 = 0. The hypothesis test will be a two-way between-groups ANOVA. students who are members in Greek organizations will have different GPAs from those who are not members—μG ≠ μNG.017).08 SSwithin = Σ(X – Mcell)2 = 0. b. nonmembers) is women who are not members of a sorority. Step 3: dfcolumns(gender) = 2 – 1 = 1 dfrows(Greek) = 2 – 1 = 1 dfinteraction = (1)(1) = 1 dfwithin = dfG. The comparison distributions will be F distributions. Step 2: Main effect of first independent variable—Greek membership: Null hypothesis: On average.

in what is called a social market.145 Step 6: There is a statistically significant effect of Greek membership.00: 8. low amount of $0. There is a statistically significant main effect of Greek membership.00: 7. moderate amount of $5.50: 4. 5. It appears that those who are not members of the Greek system have higher GPAs. than those who are members. we can only conclude that there is insufficient evidence that the effect of Greek membership depends on gender. on average.SSinteraction = SStotal – (SSrow(Greek) + SScolumn(gender)) + SSwithin = 0. There is no statistically significant main effect of gender. 5. 4 Cash payment. 6. On the other hand. on average. we can only conclude that there is insufficient evidence that men and women have different GPAs. There is not a statistically significant interaction. low amount valued at $0. college students were asked to estimate a nother student’s willingness to help load a sofa into a van in return for a cash payment or no payment (rather than money. effort would increase as a function of payment level. 6. 8. members of Greek organizations have lower GPAs than nonmembers. Cash payment. e. 5. There is no statistically significant interaction. Heyman and Ariely (2004) were interested in whether effort and willingness to help were affected by the form and amount of payment offered in return for effort. in what is called a money market. 12-43. 8. 7 Candy payment. 5 . if effort is performed out of altruism.50: 6. d. On average. the level of effort would be consistently high and unaffected by level of payment. In one of their studies. these students received candy of equivalent value). They predicted that when money was used as payment. 7. 7 Candy payment. moderate amount valued at $5.‖ Data are presented here to re create some of their findings. Willingness to help was assessed using an 11-point scale ranging from ―not at all likely to help‖ to ―will help for sure.

00. the bar graph helps us to see that there is really an interaction. e. has two levels. The effect for amount of payment only seems to occurs for the cash payment system. Using this graph and the table of cell means.50 and $5. level of payment.a. cash and candy. the amount of payment does seem to . $0. At first. it looks as if there is a main effect for amount of payment but not for type of payment. The dependent variable is willingness to help. The second independent variable. type of payment. describe what effects you see in the pattern of the data. What are the independent variables and their levels? b. d. e. Create a bar graph. c. The first independent variable. however. has two levels. based on the marginal means in the table. as assessed via an 11-point scale. Answer: a. What is the dependent variable? c. Include the cell and marginal means. b. Draw a table that lists the cells of the study design. So.

Do you think there is a significant interaction? If yes. 6. Draw a table that lists the cells of the study design. (Notice that all data are the same as earlier with the addition of new data under a high payment amount. the amount given does not seem to affect mean willingness to help. valued at $50. moderate amount. what additional analyses are needed? Explain what you would do and why. 8. 6 a. let’s assume a higher level of payment was included and the following data were collected. d. 8. e. 5. The dependent variable is still willingness to help. 7. with three levels now (low. 12-45. 6. What are the independent variables and their levels? What is the dependent variable? b. .00: 9. 5 Candy payment. but only when cash is used to compensate efforts. valued at $0. 5. 4 Cash payment.00: 7. 7. high amount of $50. low amount of $0. Include the cell and marginal means. Now that one independent variable has three levels. as assessed with the 11-point scale.affect mean willingness to help. b. low amount. valued at $5.) Cash payment. moderate. 8. 7 Candy payment.50: 6. Expanding on the work of Heyman and Ariely (2004). 5. with two levels still.50: 4. 7. Where do you think significant differences would exist based on the graph you created? Answer: a. high amount.00: 6. Create a new bar graph of these data. and level of payment. The independent variables are type of payment.00: 8. describe it in words. When candy is used. 7. and high). 8 Candy payment. 7 Cash payment. c. moderate amount of $5.

Specifically. and the interaction of these two variables. and a moderate or high level leads to a higher willingness to help. Based on the graph we created. than when candy is used. on average. e. membership in a Greek organization. Using your work from Exercise 12-41. Answer: For the main effect of Greek membership: According to Cohen’s conventions. 12-47. for the main effect of gender. For the main effect of gender: . on average. R2.d. this is a large effect size. we would need to compare the three levels of payment to see where specific significant differences exist. such that the effect of the level of payment depends on the type of payment. There does seem to be the same qualitative interaction still. compute the effect size. it appears as if willingness to help in the low cash payment condition is significantly lower. Post-hoc tests would be needed. when cash payments are used. Using Cohen’s conventions. the level seems to have no mean impact. However. a low level leads to a lower willingness to help. than when candy is used. on average. interpret the effect size values. When candy payments are used. than in the moderate and high conditions for cash payments.

and therefore no effect size. 12-49. for the main effect of form of payment. For the main effect of level of payment: According to Cohen’s conventions. this is a large effect size. interpret the effect -size values. this is a medium effect size. this is a large effect size. .According to Cohen’s conventions. For the interaction: According to Cohen’s conventions. Using Cohen’s conventions. Answer: For the main effect of type of payment: We do not need to refer to Cohen’s guidelines to know that there is no effect here. Let’s follow up on what we learned in Exercise 12-44 about motivating helpful behavior through different forms and levels of payment. For the interaction: According to Cohen’s conventions. this is a large effect size. Compute the effect size. and the interaction of these two variables. R2. level of payment.

- de vris tgt
- Balakrishnan and Chakravarty - 2008 - Product Design With Multiple Suppliers for Compone
- IEs and Experimental Design
- Use of X–Y Plots and Simple DOE Approach to Optimize Settings On
- L12_anova
- A Framework for Simulation
- Twoway Stata
- FINAL VIVA_PRESENTATION edited
- Design of Experiment
- A1 Dineen, Ling, Ash & DelVicchio (2007)
- tmp42D.tmp
- The Effects of Mental Imagery With Video-Modeling on Self-Efficacy and Maximal Front Squat Ability - Buck Et Al. 2016
- 9780735669130.pdf
- Mixed Factorial Designs.pdf2
- Two-way Anova
- 03.Comparative Optimism 2012 Curs3
- Stats Cheat Sheet
- Examining Behavioral Processes in Indecision: Decisional Procrastination and Decision-Making Style
- description
- Commentary 5
- Ana de la o
- MB0050 Research Methodology
- ANOVA Solving Steps From SPSS
- Dawn on SLeep
- Abstract
- Viewer Satisfaction
- Social Security
- DOE Course - Parts 1-4o
- Anova
- 42

- tmp4FFF
- Washington State’s Family Integrated Transitions Program for Juvenile Offenders
- Evidence-based Treatment of Alcohol, Drug, and Mental Health Disorders
- 09-06-2201
- UT Dallas Syllabus for psy2317.0u1.08u taught by Kristin Atchison (kja042000)
- Report to the Joint Task Force on Basic Education Finance
- maul-credo-response.pdf
- tmp6766.tmp
- Benefits and Costs of K–12 Educational Policies
- UT Dallas Syllabus for psy2317.501.08f taught by Nancy Juhn (njuhn)
- Evidence-Based Adult Corrections Programs
- tmpCCC3.tmp
- TTR-SmallReform
- Intensive Family Preservation Services
- UT Dallas Syllabus for psy2317.501.07f taught by Nancy Juhn (njuhn)
- tmpEEAE.tmp
- tmpED95.tmp
- tmp873F
- fl-response-crpe.pdf
- The Comparative Costs and Benefits of Programs to Reduce Crime, v 4.0
- ttr-uark-noexcuses.pdf
- Correctional Industries Programs for Adult Offenders in Prison
- tmpE685.tmp
- Ttr Kipp Mathematica
- The Dangerous Mentally Ill Offender Program
- tmpC6E8
- Untitled
- UT Dallas Syllabus for psy2317.001 05f taught by Nancy Juhn (njuhn)
- Study Design
- tmpEF17.tmp

- Art
- PSYCH 120 Study
- Psych 175
- Psych 121 Lecture 14
- Pic 10 Lecture 21
- Against Magic System Rules
- ...
- The Fantastic
- Psych 120 a Final Study
- Afrofuturism Resistance
- Pic 10 Lecture 18
- Psych 150 Final
- Bible
- Psych 124 Two
- Soc 148 Study
- Psych 121 Lecture 10
- Math 13
- Pic 10 Lecture 1
- Psych 121 Lecture 13
- Psych 121 Lecture 8
- Psych 121 Lecture 14
- Psych 121 Lecture 11
- Math 15
- Psych 121 Lecture 15
- Pic 10 Lecture 3
- 100BFIRST
- Pic 10 Lecture 4
- Pic 10 Lecture 2
- Pic 10 Lecture 5
- Pic 10 Lecture 3

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading