You are on page 1of 18

Reinforcement

PRACTICE NOTE No.

Guidelines for Economical Assembly of Reinforcement


1 INTRODUCTION This Reinforcement Practice Note recommends detaiIing and xing practices which will allow some exibility when placing steel reinforcing bars and fabric. Steel xing is the art of assembling reinforcement in its specied position, as shown in the drawings. Reinforcement details. which articially create xing problems are discussed in this guideline. Four topics.are considered: Relieving reinforcement congestion. Simplication of xing without affecting the design intent Reducing the. number of reinforcement items to be xed. Detailing to allow for variations in site measurements and to protect steel reinforcement against corrosion. In this guideline the term assembly of reinforcement means bringing together several items of steel in one or more structural members: within or upon formwork close to its nal position; using on-site cage assembly some distance from the forms, which may require craneage of the assembled steel to the forms; or by off-site cage assembly, which will require transportation to the site with subsequent craneage to the forms. Each assembly method has advantages which depend on site and construction practices. A method suitable for one project may be inappropriate for another. For example, crane locations and capacity, the system of formwork adopted, the method of construction, etc. may not be known to the design engineer before the contract is let, yet each can have a considerable inuence on the constroction timetable. Engineering analysis of a structure generally applies to it as a whole however each member is individually designed and detailed with its own independent reinforcement The separate members are then connected by additional reinforcement so.that, after the concrete has reached full strength, the complete structure should act as previously analysed. Throughout this guideline, we have used the term Note to describe,a statement made about a certain topic, and the term Hint to indicate a recommendation or suggestion about a suitable procedure. All the information provided in this Guiceline is directed towards the construction team, that is, the design engineer, the draftsman, scheduler, steel xer and inspector.

STEEL REINFORCEMENT INSTITUTE OF AUSTRALIA

RELIEVING REINFORCEMENT CONGESTION Reinforcement which is too close together will not permit concrete to be placed and compacted correcdy. This is what is meant by congested reinforcement. Steel congestion most often occurs at the intersection of one or more beams over a column. The vertical main bars of a column must be continuous through the intersection. Horizontal bars in the top and bottom of the beams must also pass through the intersection. Because the column concrete is placed before that of the beam, the position of the main column bars cannot be altered when xing the beam reinforcement Therefore the details must permit beam bars to be moved sideways to avoid column bars. Additionally, column bars must be spliced at a suitable location to ensure continuity in the strength of the column. The traditional form of splice is by lapping.

Because the vertical forces in the column bars must be transmitted down the column from one bar to the next, lap splices are generally made by offsetbending one of the bars at the splice. The location of this offset within the column elevation has a great affect on construction tecnniques. It can be seen therefore: that reinforcement congestion will probably occur within the column/beam intersection if the top and bottom bars of the beam and the column bar offsets are detailed to pass through that intersection. Finally, a reinforcing bar has considerably more thickness than a line on paper. Because of the deformations on a N36 bar, it has a real diameter of 40 mm; at a scale of 1:20 it occupies nearly 2 mm of available space. If its centreline is cranked one diameter, it occupies a real space of 40 mm by 80 mm within the column intersection, or a paper space of 2 mm by 4 mm. Think about it!

RECOMMENDATION 1 To improve access for concrete and compaction without change in design Situation Heavily-reinforced beam, or a narrow beam or column. Problem Main bars are so close that concrete placement is difcult. Solution Increase the member width; if not allowed, use two-bar bundles. Reason Obvious. Detailing Hint 1 With a T-beam or L-beam, top bars can be spread singly or bundled into the adjacent slab. Detailing Hint 2 For a column, bundle the bars and use an end-bearing compression splice with a suitable sleeve. Assembly Note Even when not detailed as suggested, seek approval to adopt this Recommendation.

TRADITIONAL

ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS

RECOMMENDATION 2 For locating the column bar offset below the oor level Situation Where the beam and column are of similar width. Problem The bending dimension (the offset or crank) depends on the member sizes, bar diameters, cover, etc. Then the exact position of the crank must be determined when xing the column cage from the oor below; there is little margin for error. If four beams intersect over a column, the offset location must avoid even more layers of steel. Solution Locate the bends below the lowest soft of all beams. Reason Through the intersection there will be only vertical column bars rather than a sloping portion. Design Hint Check the column strength at beam soft. Allow for extra ties at the offset bend to resist outward forces. Dene the relative position in plan-view of each column-bar at the lap. Spread beam top-bars into.the slab to create space. Detailing Hint Show extra ties with different dimensions at the top bend and within the lap to maintain the location of the splice portion during concreting. Scheduling Hint Keep upper bend about 50 mm below beam soft as a tolerance. Do not assume the offset will be just one column-bar diameter. Cont

Assembly Note In practice, pre-assembly of the column cage away from its nal location requires knowledge of the beam-bar locations. Considerable accuracy is essential to ensure that the lap will be correctly oriented. Inspection Note Before concreting, check the position and spacing of the cranks and laps at the oor level above.

SECTION THROUGH COLUMN

SECTION AA

RECOMMENDATION 3 For locating the column bar offset within the beam thickness Situation Where the beam is considerably wider than the column, for example, using bandbeams with or without prestressing. Problem The situation here is much less critical than in Recommendation 1. because the horizontal position of the beam steel can be varied on site to adjust to the space available. Solution Locate the upper bend of the crank about 50 mm below the beam top-bars. If the beam depth is adequate, Iocate the bottom bend above the beam bottom-bars. Reason Because of the greater beam width, the space occupied will be less restrictive on steel placement and concreting. Design Hint The concrete of the beam will provide resistance to the horizontal forces generated at the bends. Beam top bars can be spread into an adjoining slab. A fabric cage from oor to beam soft permits easier pre-assembly of the column steel. Detailing Hint For the crank to t into the beam depth as described above, the depth needs to be at least 450 mm (see Scheduling Hint). Using a "General Note", indicate that the beam steel may be moved sideways to bypass column bars as necessary. Scheduling Hint The slope of the crank must be no more than 1:6 on the bar centreline. Using a "twodiameter plus 10 mm overall offset with a cranklength of 10 diameters will satisty this requirement. A minimum of 300 mm is normal up to N28, with 400 mm for N32 and N36. Assembly Note Care. is still needed to position the crank so that the lap at the next oor will be alongside the next column bar. Pre-assembly of the complete column cage on the ground or off-site can be considered as an option.

SECTION THROUGH COLUMN

RECOMMENDATION 4 For locating the column bar offset just above the oor level Situation Generally without restriction at intersection of one or two beams over a column. Should be mandatory where architectural limitations unrealistically impose narrow member sizes on the structural designer. Problem To avoid many of the restrictions imposed upon Recommendation 1. This method is also essential if Recommendation 5 is adopted. Solution Firstly, lap the bar just above oor level with the crank starting above the splice. Secondly, continue the column bars without bending through the intersection level of the oor above Reason Through the intersection, each column bar now occupies only a space equal to its diameter. Locating the cage will be much simpler. The lap splice orientation and the length can be inspected and checked before concreting. Design Hint 1 Extra ties will be needed at the bend of the crank. Consider use of fabric cage from oor to soft, or even through intersection. Design Hint 2 If the column size above the oor differs from that below, terminate the lower bars below oor level as necessary. Provide a separate set of straight lap-splice bars and ties to match the new cage size. Detailing Hint All column ties can have the same dimensions. Show orientation of main bars with lapsplice in a cross-section Scheduling Hint Wherever possible provide identical bars to permit interchangability with many columns. Assembly Note The orientation of the next storey column bars in relation to the concreted lower bars can be decided during xing. This permits greater freedom of choice of xing method. Also permits pre-assembly outside formwork. Cage can be stood up on four bars xed rmly in corners, with remainder left partially loose until cage located accurately.
A A

SECTION THROUGH COLUMN

SECTION AA

RECOMMENDATION 5 To provide a variable system for off-form assembly of column and beam cages Situation 1 In most cases where one or more beams intersect over a column. It is particularly suitable for spandrels (see also Recommendation 21). Situation 2 Where off-form or off-site pre-assembly of the beam cages is adopted. Problem To overcome beam/column steel interference and simplify xing of beam steel. Solution Arrange the column cages as given in Recommendation 4. Pre-assemble the beam steel cages comprising all bottom steel and two nominal-size tie bars in the hooks of open-top stirrups. The cage. must t easily into the clear span between columns. Short bars are located in the bottom of the beam for anchorage through the column. Beam top-steel is xed separately. Reason Top steel placing is independent of the bottom steel. There is no manhandling of a cage over and through the column splice bars. The advantages are even greater when four beams intersect. Design Hint 1 The continuity bars in the bottom would generally be fewer and of smaller sizes than the main bottom bars. The length each side of the column may be either tension or compression splice, care being taken to check for stress reversal. Design Hint 2 Take advantage of the shear strength clauses of AS 3600 which allow simpler detailing if tensile reinforcement is not terminated within a tensile zone. Use of fabric as shear reinforcement can also reduce number of alternative tment spacings with faster assembly. Detailing Hint 1 Show beam top (negative moment) steel distributed into the slab near the column. Beam top bars can be supported by C-shaped closers to the open stirrups. Detailing Hint 2 For formwork economy, beam sizes should be identical where possible. If beam spans are nearly identical, and loading conditions are uniform, allow for construction exibility with identical beam cages. Make all bottom bars same length, just shorter than the clear span; this assists sorting out and reduces shear steel detailing. Inspection Note Check the basic cages before lifting into forms. Then check additional bottom and top bars after placement.
AFTER ASSEMBLY AT INTERSECTING COLUMN BASIC CAGE ARRANGEMENT

SIMPLIFICATION OF FIXING WITHOUT AFFECTING THE DESIGN INTENT

Detailing of reinforced concrete is a necessary, and sometimes expensive, operation. In principle the details are expected to provide both design intent and construction requirements. However, as regards the latter; there are many situations where many details would be necessary if every minor variation was to be shown. For this reason most design ofces adopt "Standard Details" to express the design intent because individual

member requirements can then be given in tables. From these "Standard Details" all the variations neoessary for construction must be provided by detailer or scheduler. Individual member details which need special treatment can be given as an "exception" rather than as the general rule This part of the PRN illustrates some cases where variations to standard details can be made at the site level, sometimes without direct reference to the designer.

RECOMMENDATION 6 Allow wall reinforcement to be xed from the most convenient side Denition In this Recommendation, the term grid is used to describe two layers of steel xed together at right angles. Thus, one grid of wall steel consists of one horizontal layer tied to one vertical layer; a wall can have two grids, each consisting of one layer horizontally and one vertically, ie. four layers in total. Problem Supporting the horizontal bars. Situation 1 For each grid. Solution The vertical bars are erected rst, supported by previously-cast concrete and tied to existing starter bars. Then the horizontals are lifted up on the near side and tied. If a wall has two grids, this method applies to both; the horizontals should be on both near sides Fabric can provide a complete grid in one piece. Reason Hopefully this is obvious. Caution Never deliberately give a detail which unnecessarily requires xers to manually x horizontals behind verticals, either by theading them through or by lifting them up, over and down. This practice is unsafe and time-consuming. Situation 2 A boundary wall, or core wall, where all construction is done from one side of the wall and there is no access from the "far face Solution Unless instructed otherwise, allow xing from the appropriate side for either grid. Design Hint If the design is such that horizontal bars must be located on the other side of the verticals, then this must be made particularly clear in the drawings. Detailing Hint With "standard details", ensure they provide an adequate solution To restrain the verticals, make the spacing of bars the same below and above a contruction joint For example, N12-200 below and N12-200 above, not N12-350 above. Assembly Note If horizorital bars must be xed on the far side, rst place two or more verticals temporarily near the far face, loosly support the horizontals on them, place the remainder of the verticals, properly x the horizontals, then recover the temporary verticals and x them. Messy, but one way out. Scheduling Hint If the height of the wall is variable, check whether tops of bars can be trimmed on site, or if variable-length bars can be used; eg ve or ten bars in groups with the same dimensions.

Fix far-side verticals first

Fix near-side verticals third

Fixing side

Fix far-side horizontals second

Fix near-side horizontals last

RECOMMENDATION 7 Allow for thickness of the reinforcement grid when specifying cover in walls Situation 1 Thin wall with one grid of steel. Problem To which face should cover be specied? There can be conicting requirements minimum cover compared with adequate compaction. It is the horizontal bars which interfere with concrete placement. Solution Cover probably should be specied to the vertical bar. Reason The position of the vertical bars should be dened rst (see Recommendation 6). Design Hint Specify the cover to the layer of reinforcement nearest the external surface with the worst exposure condition. Cover to horizontal bars is generally not critical for strength. Shrinkage reinforcement horizontally may exceed that vertically. Detailing Hint The real size of a deforrned bar is about 10% to 12% more than the nominal size. Check that external cover plus two layers of steel plus internal cover does not exceed wall thickness. Always allow a realistic tolerance for one face; in fact avoid specifying cover on both sides. Assembly Note It may be possible to tie and weld each grid of bars on the ground and lift them into place. If the vertical bar spacing differs each side of a construction joint, tie verticals to two temporary horizontal bars at new spacing. Situation 2 Wall with two layers of reinforcement Problem Thin wall with two layers. Solution AS 3600 requires two grids only when the wall is more than 200 mm thick. Are two layers really necessary for strength? If the answer is "yes", the above Recommendations for Situation 1 apply also; if "no use one layer and obtain better concrete placement. Design Hint Check that the reinforcement location will provide the necessary strength, allowing for room to place concrete between the grids. Two grids of fabric are easier to place than four layers of bars. Detailing Hint Each grid should be the same x verticals before horizontals. Assembly Note Ensure an adequate number of bar spacers are used to maintain both cover and spacing between the layers.

Specify this critical cover

Worst exposure this face

Non-critical cover. Avoid tight specification

RECOMMENDATION 8 Utilise designed reinforcement as supports Situation 1 Pad footing with bars in two directions. Problem How to avoid using bar chairs under every bar in the pad footing. Solution Relocate two or more footing bars from the original top layer on chairs as support for all bars of original bottom layer. These in turn support remainder of original top layer. Reason Easier to x bars on soft ground. Big reduction in amount of tying. Design Hint Allow for this method when calculating bottom cover. Effective depth will be similar for each layer. Fabric in one or two grids, interleaved, may be suitable. If bottom cover.is maintained, and the concrete depth over the upper steel layer is not reduced, this method requires no changes to the original design. Detailing Hint Show the "standard detail" this way. Scheduling Hint Allow for thickness of three layers when determining starter-bar lengths. Assembly Note Permits pre-assembly of the pad footing and chairs, with column starter-bar cage tied loosely in position, all ready to be craned into position. Situation 2 Supporting column starter bars on the pad reinforcement. Problem To allow for variations in level of the excavation, in thickness of the footing and of location of the starters after concreting. Solution Consult with site about nal footing levels to ensure adequate lap length with column is scheduled. Then use L-shaped starter bars, without offset-bends. See Recommendation 4. Reason The depth of the concrete should not be controlled by the position of the bends. Design Hint No special requirements. Check laplength for tension and compresion. Detailing Hint Detail at least three ties as support for starter-bars. Avoid varying column size below ground oor level. Scheduling Hint Bottom leg of starter must rest on at least two pad bars; a standard 90 cog may not be long enough. Even if not shown, supply extra ties for assembly purposes; they will be of same dimensions as column ties. Column bars will have crank located at bottom. See Recommendation 4 also. Assembly Note L-shaped starters permit more accurate positioning; any error here affects whole structure. Cages can be assembled before excavation is completed.
Column bars

Starter bars

Pad footing bars

Situation 3 Small retaining wall where footing and wall bars are combined. Problem Support of many L-shaped bars on earth foundation. Solution Similar to pad footing; use two or three longitudinal bars as chaired supports for the wall bars. Design Hint The vertical.wall bars must support the horizontal wall bars. See Recommendation 6. Also see Recommendation 8, Situation 1 for design hint on cover calculations. Detailing Hint All longitudinal footing bars may be used to support the L-shaped wall bars, but generally two or three are advisable. Also, one or two horizontal wall bars could be detailed behind the vertical wall bars for erection purposes. Scheduling Hint If the height of the wall is variable, check whether tops of barscan be trimmed on site, or if variable-length bars can be used; eg ve or ten bars in groups with the same dimensions. Assembly Note Use one or two horizontal bars in the wall as temporary xing bars, whether detailed that way or not. Retrieve and locate at front if not approved.

RECOMMENDATION 9 Maintaining an accurate bar spacing Situation 1 In walls and slabs, particularly at slabs and at plates. Problem Maintaining the correct design area of steel across the placing width. Denition AS 3600 uses the terms "design strip", "middle strip and column strip". The latter two are the "placing strips" used in this Recommendation. Solution Specify always the size of the bars, the number to be placed in each zone and the spacing as a guide to xers and inspectors. Reason When a detail says N16 at 150", it means that average spacing of 150 mm is required. What is more important is that the total number of bars is specied, not just the spacing. Design Hint For each design.strip, calculate total steel area (mm2) instead of spacing. Detailing Hint Convert this bar area into a whole nymber of bars, and distribute the appropriate number across each placing strip. Provide the average spacing for xing guidance. Example The design strip steel area is 10 500 mm2 in a strip 7800 mm wide. For N16 bars of area 200 mm2, calculate 52.5 bars. Specify the next whole number 53-N16. Assuming the column placing strip is one haff the design strip width but is allocated 60% of the moment, then specity "33-N16" at an approximate spacing of "120 mm". Each half middle strip then contains "10-N16 at 200". Scheduling Hint Order the number of bars if specied; otherwise calculate the number from width of slab or strip including edge cover" divided by "specied spacing". Round-up as shown above. Assembly Note The outermost reinforcement parallel to an exposed edge should be located one-half of the specied spacing (but not less than the cover) from the edge. If the details specify the edge spacing, the internal bars may need to be spread out marginally.
Edge strip
"Design Strips"

Situation 2 . At corners of walls or for vertical bars in walls. Problem Change of bar spacing for minor design advantage. Solution Ensure that bar spacing is uniform, making it much simpler to tie the next set of bars. Reason Minor changes can have a snowballing effect on future construction. Inspection Note A uniform spacing makes inspection easier.

Interior strip

Edge column strip

Middle strip
"Placing Strips"

Interior column strip

RECOMMENDATION 10 Avoid the need for xers to push slab bottom steel into supporting beams Situation A continuous slab with top steel over supporting. beams. Problem If the beam cage is in position rst, it can interfere with placing the slab steel. Solution Specify staggered slab bar ends to avoid penetration at both ends, even if only one bar length is required (see Recommendation.12). Reason Obvious. Design Hint The degree of penetration is a design decision. Detailing Hint Specify the penetration distance in millimetres. If total penetration is reiquired, cut off bottom steel clear of beam cage and push short bars through the beam to give a lap-splice each side.

RECOMMENDATION 11 To improve off-form pre-assembly of beams Situation A rectangular column layout and uniform loading. Solution Detail identical reinforcement in as many beams as possible. Reason Not only will pre-assembly be advantageous, but reinforcement cages already on site can be substituted without delay in another area if changes to the construction program occur. Design Hint 1 With uniform loading, shear steel (stirrups). at identical spacings can be repeated in many beams. Fabric stirrups can be adopted for extra cage rigidity. AS 3600 permits simplied design for shear strength if main tensile bars are not terminated within a tensile zone. Design Hint 2 "Custom design" of every beam has a considerable cost. The method of specifying a limited number of identical beams is the basis of structural steel frame design, even if the steel sections are over designed. The ability to make minor adjustments in reinforced concrete design should not be taken to extreme limits. Detailing Hint Use an identical number, size and length of bottom main bars for as many beams as possible. Make up any extra steel with loose bars. Follow Recommendation 5. Make use of "standard details" with tabulated instructions. Scheduling Hint Because the cages should be identical, check with site for clear-span dimensions. Assembly Note Permits prefabrication, faster xing and is in line with previous Recommendations. Inspection Note Cages can be inspected in detail before placing in forms, then only the extra loose bars need be checked before concreting.

10

REDUCING THE NUMBER OF REINFORCEMENT ITEMS TO BE FIXED

Each bar that is shown on a drawing requires many other people to take appropriate action, which implies that time is spent. Some of those involved are the designer and checking engineer, the draftsperson and scheduler, quantity surveyor and estimator, steel xers and inspectors. RECOMMENDATION 12

This section offers suggestions for reducing the total number of reinforcement items; to do this does not necessarily mean a reduction in the total quantity of steel, but they should be considered in the contex of reducing the overall cost and time.

When detailing staggered bars, use one length where posible Situation Bottom steel in slabs generally. The same approach applies to top steel as well. Problem To provide the most economical quantity of steel, without increasing the amount of sorting and fetching on site. Solution Is best explained with sketches. Layout 1 indicates the strength requirements - all bottom bars are the same size and length. Because design codes usually allow 50% of the bars to be cut-off" short of the support or column line, layouts 2 or 3 are possible solutions. Layout 3 is strongly recommended. Reason AS 3600 requires that in at slabs, 50% of bottom bars must be lapped 50-bar diameters near the column centre line The remainder are to be terminated no more then 1/10 th clear span from the face of the nearest support. This applies to middle and column placing strips. Layout 3 therefore provides much greater tolerance for placing. Design Hint 1 With bars as bottom reinforcement, it is simpler if the same bar size is used throughout the whole slab and the spacing is varied within each strip. With narrow fabric strips, the wire size can be changed or the spacing between each strip can be modied. Design Hint 2 For at slabs AS 3600 permits a more uniform bottom steel layout than previous standards. Steel additional to a uniformly spaced layer can always be provided by a couple of extra bars. Wherever possible use a standard detail with a schedule showing panel details. Detailing Hint 1 The requirements for an end span are slightly different. 100% of bottom bars must go into the support. Odd shaped panels need special attention. Detailing Hint 2 To avoid complications, decide which layer of the bottom bars will be placed rst (north-south or east-west) and stick to it. Scheduling Hint If there are an odd number of staggered bars in an end span, the extra bar should be a long bar. Use as few different lengths as possible. Group identical bars together in a bundle and label it to identify the several panels where the steel will t.
LAYOUT 2 LAYOUT 1

Assembly Note If detailing is simplied then a bar taken from one bundle may often suit several locations. If every bar must be tailor-made for each position, never open a bundle labelled for another area. Inspection Note One bar length, when staggered, permits easier visual checking. In particular check that end cover to an edge is clear of all steel.

B F A E

D C D

LAYOUT 3

11

RECOMMENDATION 13 Carefully check variations in bar and fabric shapes Problem Changes of concrete outlines can unwittingly create multiple bar shapes. Solution Iif a typical detail", such as a cross-section of an edge is referred to several times, ensure that the detail really applies in all cases and matches the architectural shape. Reason Obvious. Detailing Hint Every shape, actually drawn or implied, requires additional action by others, but do not leave too much to other's imagination. Scheduling Hint Each shape requires a different set-up of bending dimensions, with a consequent chance of error. Inspection Note Both architecyural and engineering drawings must be referred to.

RECOMMENDATION 14 Minimise the number of reinforcement cut-off points Situation Particularly bottom and top steel in slabs. Problem Follows on from Recommendation 12. Solution One bar length staggered when placed, will provide two cut-off locations; this is quite adequate. Reason Minor savings in steel length will not compensate for subsequent site delays.

RECOMMENDATION 15 Use only one bar size in any one column lift, unless location of every bar is given in large-scale details Situation Applies to all columns, except in very tall buildings where bundled bars are used. Problem Guaranteeing the desired result. Solution Specify one bar size in any one column lift. Reason Ensuring the right bar goes where it is designed. Design Hint 1 The most economical column is one with the same dimensions for many storeys, adequate room for vibrators and any embedded duct-work, the minimum percentage of high strength steel, and high strength concrete which can vary up the building. Design Hint 2 Where possible, specify the same concrete strength for all columns throughout one storey. Detailing Hint Ensure each location is clear. Consider giving instructions for a template in complex cases. With bundled bars, specifyr the location of each end-bearing splice. Inspection Note With circular columns in particular, check orientation of every main bar relative to the structure.

12

RECOMMENDATION 16 Reduce the number of bar combinations by careful planning of construction joints and lap-splice locations Situation Retaining wall with various levels. As an example, this wall has 14 sets of bars. Each set consists of an L-shaped bar coming out of the footing, and lapping with a straight bar in the wall. Problem If all bars were made in one piece, there would be seven different shapes; ve to t into the sloped top, and two sets to match the change in footing height. Solution 1 Provide identical footing bars. Then supply the wall bars in two lengths so that they are supported by the top of the footing. Trim the top ends to suit any slope (oxy torch or other device); this is the disadvantage of this method This solution is best for heavy bars or fabric sheets. Solution 2 Provide two sizes of footing bars, and one length of wall bar The latter can be adjusted for position by varying the lap length from the minimum at the right hand side. That the wall bar is not supported by concrete is a disadvantage, but two or three horizontals can be used as preliminary supports. This methbd is suited to smaller-size bars. Caution Solution 2 may not work if the wall slopes more than can be accommodated by the lap length. An additional bar length may be needed for the sloped top. Design Hint Nothing special, but the solutions provide for exible site dimensions. It is essential that the spacing of the wall bars is the same as the starter bars. Detailing Hint To get a rush job started, keep the footing bars as few and as simple as possible. Scheduling Hint Provide adequate lap length with the L-shaped footing bars; the wall bars can be amended for wall height after actual levels are known. Assembly Note The preferred method for xing should be advised to the scheduler. Inspection Note On a long sloping wall, groups of bars of the same length are usually provided, each group differing by 100 mm or so to reduce handling and sorting and relieve pressure on tolerances. Take site adjustments into account and do not expect high accuracy at BOTH ends of the wall bars.
SOLUTION 2

SOLUTION 1

13

DETAILING TO ALLOW FOR VARIATIONS IN SITE MEASUREMENTS AND TO PROTECT REINFORCEMENT AGAINST CORROSION

The cheapest and most effective protective device is concrete of the correct quality, properly placed and compacted, with adequate real cover to the steel. In addition, if reinforcement is not xed in its designed position then the strength of the structure can be reduced. This section illustrates how concrete cover can be controlled in various situations.

Corrosion of reinforcement inside commercial or residential buildings is rare. Reinforcement is very much more at risk when exposed to polluted air, to sea water or sea spray, to aggressive industrial environments, and to other atmospheric or ground-water conditions.

RECOMMENDATION 17 Maintain cover and also allow for construction tolerances by careful choice of lap splices Situation Wall of a tank with reinforcement continuous around the corner Only one grid of steel is shown the problem gets worse with two grids. Problem If the bar is to be installed in one length, it must have a bend at each end (LL-shape) and be xed to match other reinforcement and for work, possibly in place already. Solution 1 Use two L-shaped bars per side of wall, lapped well outside the corners. Solution 2 Use an L-shaped bar around each corner, lapped with a straight bar well away from the corner. Reason Flexibility to allow different arrangements of wall forms and to keep laps out of corners. Design Hint Ensure vertical spacing between horizontal bars in walls and corners are the same to give something to tie to. Detailing Hint The specied lap length must be more than the minimum to allow for construction variations. See also Recommendation 7. Check bend at corner will t into available concrete space. If possible specify a large llet in the corner. Scheduling Hint Corner bars should be identical. Adjust straight bar lengths to allow for the various wall lengths. Assembly Note A grid consisting of the straight horizontals and verticals (not drawn here) can be erected full height before the corner is assembled. Fabric provides a suitable substitute. Inspection Note Check that corner bar has adequate cover to the inside corner.
SOLUTION 1 ORIGINAL PLAN-VIEW OF TANK

Tank floor

Tank walls

LL-shape bar

L-shape bar

L-shape bar

L-shape bars Straight bar

SOLUTION 2

14

RECOMMENDATION 18 Avoid using a hook at the end of bar unles real anchorage problems exist Situation At the end of a bar at the outer edge of a cantilever. Problem Concrete thickness is inadequate after allowing for cover from both surfaces of the concrete added to the overall dimension of the hook. Solution 1 Rethink the design is the use of the hook just habit? If yes, delete the hooks. Solution 2 Rethink the design can the anchorage stresses really be calculated? If yes, use smallerdiameter bars with shorter development length. Detailing Hint Bring likely problem areas to designer's attention. Scheduling Hint Contact the contractor if problem foreseen.
Minimum thickness 8 x dia. + 2 covers

Assembly Note 1 If the bars are hooked, and there are no other bends, rotate hook until horizontal and x to additional tie bar. A hook should work regardless of its orientation. Assembly Note 2 Never cut the hook off; tell the supervisor or inspector of the problem. Inspection Note Members such as this are extremely prone to corrosion, particulany with thin balconies of home units. Insist on proper supports for steel and ensure bar ends are kept clear of extreme edge.

RECOMMENDATION 19 Avoid use of hooks in small or precast members Situation Where anchorage is essential. Problem A hook or cog has a real size much bigger than a pen line appears on paper. Solution Draw samples to a realistic scale and advise of problems to designer. Reason A standard 180-degree hook measures at least 8 bar diameters overall, and a 9O-degree cog is about 16 bar diameters in depth. Design Hint Review stress in vicinity of bar end. It may be so large that a welded cross piece must be used (as with bars under the load on a corbel).
16 x dia. minimum

8 x dia. minimum

15

RECOMMENDATION 20 Provide a bevel at an internal corner of a wall Situation Where a bent bar must t around a corner. See examples in Recommendation 17. Problem Insufcient cover at inside of bend. Solution Provide an adequate bevel inside the corner or specify greater cover to bar in the wall. Detailing Hint Remember that the minimum bend diameter of a bar is 5 bar diameters. Scheduling Hint Do not reduce pin size below recommended minimums. Assembly Note Avoid cutting the inside corner.

RECOMMENDATION 21 Do not combine shear reinforcement of a beam with top reinforcement of a slab Situation At a spandrel beam. Problem The projecting slab bars prevent xers handling the cage, thus making placing the beam extremely difcult. Solution Design and detail the two sets of steel independently. Reason Shear.reinforcement of a spandrel is often used for torsion resistance as well, and should be closed ties with 135-degree hooks. The spacing is unlikely to correspond to that required for exure by the slab steel. Design Hint The bar size of the ties and the slab steel will probably differ. Allow for this in cover calculations. Detailing Hint Draw the beam as a cage as shown in Recommendation 5. Specify the slab top steel separately. Specify adequate support for cage and bars to prevent rotation within the forms. Scheduling Hint Check required height of chairs for top steel support and particularly for support of construction trafc in this edge situation Assembly Note 1 The beam cage can be prefabricated as previously described; it should be placed rst. Then x slab bottom steel, sliding it through cage to get adequate penetration. Do not let it touch outer edge. Finally x slab top bars with hook, if detailed, inside the beam cage and not at outer edge. Assembly Note 2 The aim is to avoid twisting the beam cage within the form or to stop the top bar hook from reducing side cover. Inspection Note Carefully check for reduced cover at beam outer face, especially if an exposed spandrel.
Beam and slab sets of steel designed and detailed independently

CORRECT DETAIL TO PREVENT THE FOLLOWING

16

RECOMMENDATION 22 Take special precautions where a drip-groove is specied below an external member Situation External beams and precast wall panels, and at edges of balconies. Problem Corrosion of steel because of water penetration and reduced cover. Solution Specify extra cover at soft of beam to allow for depth of drip-groove, and allow for possible reduction in effective depth of beam bottom steel. Alternatively, introduce a drip-bulge rather than a drip-groove, although this may increase formwork costs. Scheduling Hint Allow for reduced size of cage tments. Assembly Note If a drip-groove is used, increase height of bar supports in bottom of beam. Inspection Note These grooves are very likely to cause cracks and steel corrosion will follow.
Cover Cover

AS DRAWN

AS BUILT

SOLUTION 1

SOLUTION 2

RECOMMENDATION 23 Allow for variations in length of vertical members Situation 1 Supporting steel cages for cast-insitu bored piers. Problem To restrain cage shape and position in bore hole. Solution S t e p 1 Pre-assemble cages using wire helix (spiral) or fabric cage. Weld short bars in crossform to main bars; more then two may be needed for long cage. S t e p 2 Support cage across hole with removable timber or steel piece. Scheduling Hint Check whether or not cage must be full depth of hole. Provide range of lengths so that cage can be prefabricated early, and placed and concreted immediately excavation is approved. Situation 2 At roof level where column bars are to be bent into slab. Problem To ensure adequate cover is maintained. Solution Use separate L-shaped bars lap-spliced to column bars. Design Hint Keep the number of bent bars to a minimum to reduce steel congestion. It may be possible to locate top of L-bar at mid-depth of slab.
Forms FFL Cross-rods welded to main bars

STEP 1

17

Reinforcement PRACTICE NOTE No.

Steel Reinforcement Institute of Australia


ACN 003 653 665

SRIA NATIONAL OFFICE PO BOX 280 CROWS NEST NSW 2065 TELEPHONE: FREE CALL: FACSIMILE: EMAIL: INTERNET: 02 9929 3033 1300 300 114 02 9929 3255 sria@sria.com.au www.sria.com.au

STEEL REINFORCEMENT INSTITUTE OF AUSTRALIA

Copyright 2001 Steel Reinforcement Institute of Australia

RPN 2 March 2001

ADAPTED

TO

The Steel Reinforcement Institute of Australia is a national non-prot organisation sponsored by the reinforcing steel industry in Australia to promote the use of steel reinforcement in concrete structures, houses and pavements. Since the information it provides is intended for guidance only, it in no way replaces the services of professional consultants on particular projects, and no legal liability can be accepted by the Institute for its use.

ELECTRONIC

FORM

BY

TECHMEDIA

PUBLISHING

PTY

LTD

61

9477

7766