This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

BooksAudiobooksComicsSheet Music### Categories

### Categories

### Categories

Editors' Picks Books

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Editors' Picks Audiobooks

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Editors' Picks Comics

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Editors' Picks Sheet Music

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Top Books

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Audiobooks

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Comics

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Sheet Music

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Welcome to Scribd! Start your free trial and access books, documents and more.Find out more

**(Mock) End of term test
**

There are two questions, you only need to answer one of them, but you should answer all the parts of the question you choose. If you answer both questions, the highest of your marks will be taken, but I do not expect you will have time to do this. Points will be awarded for your workings as well as your final answer. I advise you to use a calculator that works with fractions rather than decimals. You may also find it helps to work with letters rather than numbers for as long as possible. You have 90 minutes.

In the actual end of term test, I will just change the numbers.

Page 1 of 6

1.

Question 1

Sainsbury’s and Tesco are located at both ends of a one mile long street. There are two types of shoppers (called “high-value” and “low-value”), with equal numbers of each type. High-value shoppers obtain a value of £𝑣𝐻𝐼 from buying a tub of Haagen-Dazs ice-cream, and an additional value of £𝑣𝐻𝑆 if they buy a bottle of Sainsbury’s Taste the Difference Maple Syrup as well, or an additional value of £𝑣𝐻𝑇 if they buy a bottle of Tesco Value Maple Syrup as well. Low-value shoppers obtain a value of £𝑣𝐿𝐼 from buying a tub of Haagen-Dazs ice-cream, and an additional value of £𝑣𝐿𝑀 from buying either variety of maple syrup. All shoppers only obtain any value from the first tub of ice-cream and the first bottle of maple syrup they buy (so they will not buy more than one). No shoppers get any value from buying maple syrup without ice-cream, but they do still get value from buying ice-cream without maple syrup. Shoppers of both kinds are uniformly distributed along this street. Both kinds have linear transport costs, so that walking 𝑑 miles costs them £𝑡𝑑 in lost value. However, once they have been to either Sainsbury’s or Tesco, they are laden down with shopping, so they wish to just walk home. (I.e. you may assume that the transport cost of visiting both Sainsbury’s and Tesco is infinite.) For both Sainsbury’s and Tesco, Haagen-Dazs has a constant marginal cost of 𝑐𝐼 . Sainsbury’s Taste the Difference Maple Syrup has a marginal cost of 𝑐𝑆 for Sainsbury’s, and Tesco Value Maple Syrup has a marginal cost of 𝑐𝑇 for Tesco. Sainsbury’s and Tesco cannot differentiate between the two types of shopper based on observable characteristics. Sainsbury’s charges 𝑝𝑆𝐼 for Haagen-Dazs and 𝑝𝑆𝑀 for their maple syrup. Tesco charges 𝑝𝑇𝐼 for HaagenDazs and 𝑝𝑇𝑀 for their maple syrup. You may assume the following parameter values. (These are the only things which will change in the actual test.) 𝑣𝐻𝐼 = 5, 𝑣𝐻𝑆 = 2, 𝑣𝐻𝑇 = 2, 𝑣𝐿𝐼 = 3, 𝑣𝐿𝑀 = 1, 𝑐𝐼 = 2, 𝑐𝑆 = 1, 𝑐𝑇 = 2, 𝑡 = 3. a) Assume that in equilibrium, all consumers buy both ice cream and maple syrup. How far from Sainsbury’s is the high-value shopper who is just indifferent between buying from Sainsbury’s and buying from Tesco’s? How far from Sainsbury’s is the low-value shopper who is just indifferent between buying from Sainsbury’s and buying from Tesco’s? (Your answers may be a function of firms’ prices.) (10%) b) Given shoppers are visiting Sainsbury’s or Tesco anyway to buy ice cream, what must be true for them to want to buy maple syrup as well? (Your answer may differ across types of shopper.) Explain why this means that Sainsbury’s will price maple syrup at either 𝑣𝐻𝑆 or 𝑣𝐿𝑀 (rather than any other price), and why Tesco will price it at either 𝑣𝐻𝑇 or 𝑣𝐿𝑀 , (rather than any other price). In each case, you do not have to say which of the two options the supermarket would choose. (10%) c) Suppose that both shops sell their brands of maple syrup at 𝑣𝐿𝑀 . Write down each supermarket’s profits as a function of prices. (Hint: be careful to include the revenue from selling both ice-cream and maple syrup, to both high-value and low-value customers. Don’t forget costs either!) Then derive their optimal price for ice-cream. You should find that Sainsbury’s sell ice-cream at £ 12 and Tesco sell it at

31 3 1 2

Page 2 of 6

£ . Explain intuitively why Sainsbury’s is charging a higher price for ice-cream despite having identical costs. d) Calculate both supermarkets’ profits at the prices you found in (c). (30%) (10%)

9 4

e) Now suppose that Sainsbury’s deviates to selling maple syrup at 𝑣𝐻𝑆 , with Tesco still selling their maple syrup at 𝑣𝐿𝑀 . Which types of consumers would buy maple syrup from Sainsbury’s, given they were visiting the store anyway? Which types would buy maple syrup from Tesco’s, given they were visiting the store anyway? (5%) f) Under the set-up of (e), how far from Sainsbury’s is the high-value shopper who is just indifferent between buying from Sainsbury’s and buying from Tesco? how far from Sainsbury’s is the low-value consumer that is just indifferent between buying from Sainsbury’s and buying from Tesco? Your answers should be a function of 𝑝𝑆𝐼 and 𝑝𝑇𝐼 , not the solution found in (c). (5%) g) Under the set-up of (e), write down an expression for each supermarket’s profits as a function of prices. (Again, be careful to include the revenue from selling both ice-cream and maple syrup, to both high-value and low-value customers.) You do not need to attempt to maximise this expression for profits. (5%) h) A kindly mathematician tells you that when you hold 𝑝𝑇𝐼 at the value you found in (c), under the set-up of (e), by choosing 𝑝𝑆𝐼 optimally Sainsbury’s will make profits of 96. They go on to tell you that if you repeat the exercise of parts (e) to (g) assuming that Tesco instead deviate to charging 𝑣𝐻𝑇 for syrup, then with 𝑝𝑆𝐼 held at the value you found in (c), and 𝑝𝑇𝐼 chosen optimally, Tesco will make profits of

27 . 128 31

Using your answer to part (d), and the calculations of this friendly mathematician, (5%)

explain why both firms selling syrup at 𝑣𝐿𝑀 must be a Nash equilibrium.

i) Now, suppose that Sainsbury’s decide to introduce a “Brand Match Guarantee”, as they have done in real life. This is effectively a commitment to never price branded goods higher than Tesco does. Since both firms only sell non-branded maple syrup, here this promise just applies to the Haagen-Dazs ice-cream. Given this guarantee (and assuming that Sainsbury’s can react instantly), what effect does a cut in Tesco’s ice-cream price have on Tesco’s profits? As a result, assuming each firm still sells maple syrup at 𝑣𝐿𝑀 , what price will each firm set for ice-cream in equilibrium? What are profits? (20%)

BONUS QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE SPARE TIME: YOUR MARK CANNOT GO OVER 100% SCORES GIVEN HERE ARE ONLY ILLUSTRATIVE, AND EVEN A PERFECT ANSWER MAY ATTRACT EITHER HIGHER OR LOWER POINTS AT MY DISCRETION. THUS I DO NOT ADVISE YOU TO SKIP PARTS ABOVE IN ORDER TO ANSWER THESE PARTS. j) Find the Nash equilibrium for maple syrup prices in the set-up of part (i). k) Prove the results of the friendly mathematician from part (h). (5%) (20%)

Page 3 of 6

2.

Question 2

The town of Boxton contains four roads arranged in a square, as shown in the picture below:

A newsagent’s shop is located at each of the four corners, and houses are evenly distributed along each of the roads. Everyone in Boxton is addicted to cigarettes, so they each want to buy a pack of cigarettes from one of the newsagents each day. You may assume that each road is of length one, and contains a unit mass of consumers, as in the standard Hotelling model. Consumers are lazy however, so it costs a consumer 𝑡𝑥 to walk a distance of 𝑥 to buy their cigarettes, with 𝑡 > 0. (So the total cost of buying from a newsagent that sells cigarettes at 𝑝 is 𝑝 + 𝑡𝑥 where 𝑥 is the distance from the consumer to the newsagent.) Assume that consumers value their pack of cigarettes at 𝑣 > 2𝑡 , (so 𝑣 is the most they are prepared to pay in total, including their transport cost) and that all newsagents can produce cigarettes at zero marginal cost. Suppose for the moment that firms were choosing a price only once. (a) Consider any of the four roads. The consumers along that road will want to buy from the firm at one end or the other. Call the left hand firm 𝐴 and the right hand firm 𝐵. As a function of the price charged by firm 𝐴 (𝑝𝐴 ) and the price charged by firm 𝐵 (𝑝𝐵 ), how far from firm 𝐴 along the road is the indifferent consumer? (10%) (b) Now suppose that all firms except one are charging a price 𝑝𝐵 . Call the price charged by the remaining firm 𝑝𝐴 . Remembering that firm 𝐴 will be selling to consumers located on two different roads, what price should firm 𝐴 charge to maximise its profits, as a function of 𝑝𝐵 ? You may assume that 𝑣 > 𝑝𝐵 + 𝑡, so consumers always want to purchase a pack of cigarettes. (20%) (c) Since all firms are symmetric, in equilibrium all firms will charge the same price. By setting 𝑝𝐴 = 𝑝𝐵 , solve for the equilibrium price. (10%) (d) What is the total amount “spent” on transport costs in this set-up? (To work this out, look at a single road first, and draw a graph of transport costs as a function of location along this road (this should be a triangle). The area under this graph is total transport costs for consumers who live on this road.) (20%)

Page 4 of 6

The Mayor of Boxton is concerned that there is insufficient competition amongst newsagents, so she decides to build a subway system linking each corner to every other corner, as shown in the dotted lines below:

(You may think of the point in the middle where the lines cross as a central station at which consumers can change trains.) The Mayor makes all subway trains free. Additionally, the value consumers get from talking to their friends on the train exactly offsets their irritation at the length of the journey. Therefore a consumer located in one of the four corners can buy from any firm without paying any transport costs at all. (It is as if there were instant teleportation machines located at each of the corners.) You may continue to suppose that firms are choosing prices only once. HINT: You should not need to do any maths for any of the remaining parts.

(e) Suppose a consumer is located at one of the four corners, assuming that the firms are all charging different prices, which firm would the consumer prefer to buy from and why? (4%) (f) Now suppose that a consumer is located somewhere along one of the roads. Given that once they reach one end, they can then get a subway to the opposite end at zero cost, to which corner will consumers walk? (They might not necessarily buy from this corner.) (2%) (g) Given your answers to (e) and (f), describe the behaviour of a consumer located somewhere along one of the roads, when all firms are charging different prices. (4%) (h) Hence, what prices will firms set? (2%)

(i) Suppose that when it does not save them any money, consumers prefer not to use the subway. (But if they can save even 1p by using it they gladly will.) Does anyone use the subway in equilibrium? Given your answer to (d), what are total transport costs now? (4%) (j) Has total surplus improved? (And why/why not?) Assuming that building the subway cost a positive amount, should the Mayor have bothered? (4%)

Page 5 of 6

Now suppose that rather than just choosing a price just once, firms are able to change their price each day, based on what they observe other firms doing, for example. (k) Describe the symmetric equilibrium in which total industry profits are highest. What profits does each firm make on each day in this equilibrium? How are firms able to make profits at all? (You may assume that if all newsagents were owned by the same company, 𝑡 then that company would set a price of 𝑣 − 2.) (10%) (l) Would this equilibrium have been any different in the absence of the subways? Would it have been any easier to sustain? Does this change your answer to (j)? (10%)

BONUS QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE SPARE TIME: YOUR MARK CANNOT GO OVER 100% SCORES GIVEN HERE ARE ONLY ILLUSTRATIVE, AND EVEN A PERFECT ANSWER MAY ATTRACT EITHER HIGHER OR LOWER POINTS AT MY DISCRETION. THUS I DO NOT ADVISE YOU TO SKIP PARTS ABOVE IN ORDER TO ANSWER THESE PARTS.

(m) Prove that if all newsagents were owned by the same company, that company would set 𝑡 a price of 𝑣 − 2? (25%)

Page 6 of 6

Mock End of Term Test 2013

Mock End of Term Test 2013

Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

We've moved you to where you read on your other device.

Get the full title to continue

Get the full title to continue listening from where you left off, or restart the preview.

scribd