You are on page 1of 13

Universität Bern

Hochschulstrasse 4

3012 Bern

Sehr geehrter Herr


Dr. Tudor Girba (PERSÖNLICH)

Institut für Informatik und angewandte Mathematik


Neubrückstrasse 10

Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden

Sehr geehrter Herr Dr. Girba,

Please find attached the results of the automatic analysis belonging to the evaluation of the
course 08 W7084 Software Evolution. Type of questionnaire VORLe. Please observe: The
results first show under the heading "Globalwerte" the mean value for the following
dimensions:
- Planning and Presentation
- Manners with Students
- Interest and Relevance
- Complexity and Scope
- Overall Assessment of Course
- Overall Assessment of Lecturer
- Overall Assessment of Teaching Methods

The second part shows the results for all the questions individually.

1 equals the lowest grade (unless the question is inverted), 4 or more the highest grade. In
the group 'Complexity and Scope' the grade 3 corresponds to "exactly right".

We hope that this report is useful for the further plannung of your teaching.

Please briefly discuss the results of this evaluation with your students.

The collaborators of the Group "Hochschuldidaktik" (contact: helmut.ertel@kwb.unibe.ch)


are happy to discuss the results with you. Please bring a copy of the reports with you since
they are not accessible to anybody else but you.

The evaluation process and details for your faculty may be found under: http://www.rektorat.
unibe.ch/unibe/rektorat/unistab/content/e362/e1957/e980/LeitfadenLVEvalDezember2008.
pdf

In case you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact us.

05.03.2009 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 1


Dr.Tudor Girba
08 W7084 Software Evolution (W7084)
Erfasste Fragebögen = 18

Globalwerte

1 2 3 4 mw=3.5
Planning and Presentation - +
s=0.6

1 2 3 4 mw=3.8
Manners with Students - +
s=0.4

1 2 3 4 mw=3.6
Interest and Relevance - +
s=0.5

1 2 3 4 5 mw=3
Complexity and Scope - +
s=0.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 mw=5.1
Overall Assessment of Course - +
s=0.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 mw=5.7
Overall Assessment of Lecturer - +
s=0.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 mw=5.3
Overall Assessment of Teaching Methods - +
s=0.6

Relative Häufigkeiten der Antworten Std.-Abw. Mittelwert Median Quantil


Legende 1 2 3 4 5
Linker Pol Rechter Pol n=Anzahl
Fragetext mw=Mittelwert
md=Median
s=Standardabweichung
E.=Enthaltung
Skala Histogramm

Planning and Presentation

1_A) 0% 0% 33% 67%


1 The course follows a coherent structure. not true true n=18
mw=3.7
md=4
s=0.5
1 2 3 4
1_B) 0% 6% 22% 72%
2 The wider context of the subject matter is not true not true n=18
sufficiently elucidated. mw=3.7
md=4
s=0.6
1 2 3 4
1_C) 0% 0% 28% 72%
3 The lecturer expresses him-/herself clearly and not true true n=18
comprehensibly. mw=3.7
md=4
s=0.5
1 2 3 4
1_D) 0% 0% 39% 61%
4 The course provides an adequate overview of the not true true n=18
subject matter treated. mw=3.6
md=4
s=0.5
1 2 3 4
1_E) 0% 0% 41% 59%
5 The design of the course contributes to an not true true n=17
understanding of the subject matter. mw=3.6
md=4
s=0.5
1 2 3 4

05.03.2009 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 2


1_F) 0% 35% 29% 35%
6 There is overall enough material provided to not true true n=17
assist the learning process (slides, course material, mw=3
hand-outds, etc.). md=3
s=0.9
1 2 3 4
1_G) 0% 11% 50% 39%
7 The course materials (slides, course manuals, not true true n=18
hand-outs, etc.) are overall of sufficient quality. mw=3.3
md=3
s=0.7
1 2 3 4

Manners with Students

2_A) 0% 0% 17% 83%


8 The lecturer takes students seriously. not true true n=18
mw=3.8
md=4
s=0.4
1 2 3 4
2_B) 0% 0% 22% 78%
9 The lecturer is friendly and respectful towards not true true n=18
students. mw=3.8
md=4
s=0.4
1 2 3 4
2_C) 0% 0% 17% 83%
10 The lecturer adresses questions and not true true n=18
suggestions from students adequately. mw=3.8
md=4
s=0.4
1 2 3 4
2_D) 0% 0% 24% 76%
11 The lecturer doesn't seem to care about his/her true not true n=17
students' progress. mw=3.8
md=4
s=0.4
E.=1
1 2 3 4

Interest and Relevance

3_A) 0% 0% 22% 78%


12 The lecturer succeeds in making the course not true true n=18
interesting. mw=3.8
md=4
s=0.4
1 2 3 4
3_B) 0% 0% 56% 44%
13 The course is probably very useful for my future not true true n=16
professional life. mw=3.4
md=3
s=0.5
E.=2
1 2 3 4
3_C) 0% 6% 12% 82%
14 The applicability and relevance of the subject true not true n=17
matter is not sufficiently clarified by the lecturer. mw=3.8
md=4
s=0.6
E.=1
1 2 3 4
3_D) 0% 0% 50% 50%
15 The lecturer fosters my interest in the subject. not true true n=18
mw=3.5
md=3.5
s=0.5
1 2 3 4

05.03.2009 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 3


Complexity and Scope

4_A) 0% 11% 83% 6% 0%


16 The degree of complexity of the course is: far too low/narrow far too high/wide n=18
mw=2.9
md=3
s=0.4
1 2 3 4 5

4_B) 0% 6% 83% 11% 0%


17 The scope of the course is: far too low/narrow far too high/wide n=18
mw=3.1
md=3
s=0.4
1 2 3 4 5

4_C) 0% 17% 78% 6% 0%


18 The pace of the course is: far too low/narrow far too high/wide n=18
mw=2.9
md=3
s=0.5
1 2 3 4 5

4_D) 0% 6% 78% 11% 6%


19 The amount of knowledge presupposed by the far too low/narrow far too high/wide n=18
course is: mw=3.2
md=3
s=0.6
1 2 3 4 5

Overall Assessment of Course

5_A) 0% 0% 0% 11% 72% 17%


20 How would you grade the course as a whole? 1 (poor) 6 (excellent) n=18
mw=5.1
md=5
s=0.5
1 2 3 4 5 6

Overall Assessment of Lecturer

6_A) 0% 0% 0% 0% 28% 72%


21 How would you grade the lecturer with regard to 1 (poor) 6 (excellent) n=18
subject expertise? mw=5.7
md=6
s=0.5
1 2 3 4 5 6

Overall Assessment of Teaching Methods

7_A) 0% 0% 0% 6% 56% 39%


22 How would you grade the lecturer with regard to 1 (poor) 6 (excellent) n=18
teaching methods? mw=5.3
md=5
s=0.6
1 2 3 4 5 6

7_B)
23 The course has taught me n=15

very little 0%

little 0%

this or that 13.3%

a lot 86.7%

an awful lot 0%

05.03.2009 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 4


Sociodemographic Data and Background Variables

8_A)
24 How many hours per week did you invest in preparation and revision for the course (on average)? n=18

0h 5.6%

less than 2h 5.6%

2 to 4h 77.8%

4 to 6h 11.1%

more than 6h 0%

8_B)
25 Was the topic of interest to you? n=18

not at all 0%

slightly 0%

fairly 38.9%

quite 61.1%

8_C)
26 How many lectures did you miss? n=18

none 38.9%

1-2 50%

3-4 11.1%

more than 4 0%

8_D)
27 If you missed more than 2 lectures, please give one reason: n=4

lack of interest 0%

course overlap 25%

illness etc. 50%

course manual/required reading suffices for exam preparation 0%

other reasons 25%

8_E)
28 Allocation of the course in your study programme:? n=17

mono subject/Major/Hauptfach 70.6%

Minor/Nebenfach 11.8%

complemetary or specialisation course 17.6%

05.03.2009 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 5


8_F)
29 Your current number of semesters? n=17

1 5.9%

2 0%

3 0%

4 0%

5 5.9%

6 0%

7 17.6%

8 5.9%

9 47.1%

10 0%

higher than 10 17.6%

8_G)
30 Sex n=18

female 5.6%

male 94.4%

Open Questions

9_A)
What did you like about the course?

05.03.2009 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 6


05.03.2009 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 7
9_B)
What did you not like about the course?

05.03.2009 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 8


9_C)
Suggestions for improvements?

05.03.2009 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 9


05.03.2009 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 10
Profillinie
Teilbereich: Phil.-nat. Fakultät
Name der/des Lehrenden: Dr. Tudor Girba
Titel der Lehrveranstaltung: 08 W7084 Software Evolution
(Name der Umfrage)

1_A) 1 The course follows a coherent structure. not true true mw=3.7

1_B) 2 The wider context of the subject matter is not sufficiently true not true mw=3.7
elucidated.

1_C) 3 The lecturer expresses him-/herself clearly and comprehensibly. not true true mw=3.7

1_D) 4 The course provides an adequate overview of the subject matter not true true mw=3.6
treated.

1_E) 5 The design of the course contributes to an understanding of the not true true mw=3.6
subject matter.

1_F) 6 There is overall enough material provided to assist the learning not true true mw=3
process (slides, course material, hand-outds, etc.).

1_G) 7 The course materials (slides, course manuals, hand-outs, etc.) not true true mw=3.3
are overall of sufficient quality.

2_A) 8 The lecturer takes students seriously. not true true mw=3.8

2_B) 9 The lecturer is friendly and respectful towards students. not true true mw=3.8

2_C) 10 The lecturer adresses questions and suggestions from students not true true mw=3.8
adequately.

2_D) 11 The lecturer doesn't seem to care about his/her students' true not true mw=3.8
progress.

3_A) 12 The lecturer succeeds in making the course interesting. not true true mw=3.8

3_B) 13 The course is probably very useful for my future professional not true true mw=3.4
life.

3_C) 14 The applicability and relevance of the subject matter is not true not true mw=3.8
sufficiently clarified by the lecturer.

3_D) 15 The lecturer fosters my interest in the subject. not true true mw=3.5

4_A) 16 The degree of complexity of the course is: far too low/ far too high/ mw=2.9
narrow wide

4_B) 17 The scope of the course is: far too low/ far too high/ mw=3.1
narrow wide

4_C) 18 The pace of the course is: far too low/ far too high/ mw=2.9
narrow wide

4_D) 19 The amount of knowledge presupposed by the course is: far too low/ far too high/ mw=3.2
narrow wide

5_A) 20 How would you grade the course as a whole? 1 (poor) 6 (excellent) mw=5.1

6_A) 21 How would you grade the lecturer with regard to subject 1 (poor) 6 (excellent) mw=5.7
expertise?

7_A) 22 How would you grade the lecturer with regard to teaching 1 (poor) 6 (excellent) mw=5.3
methods?

05.03.2009 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 11


Präsentationsvorlage
Vorlesung 08 W7084 Software Evolution
Dr. Tudor Girba
Erfasste Fragebögen = 18

Planning and Presentation


1 2 3 4
- +

mw = 3.5

Manners with Students


1 2 3 4
- +

mw = 3.8

Interest and Relevance


1 2 3 4
- +

mw = 3.6

The mark "3" means "exactly right". Complexity and Scope


1 2 3 4 5
- +

mw = 3

Overall Assessment of Course


1 2 3 4 5 6
- +

mw = 5.1

05.03.2009 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 12


Overall Assessment of Lecturer
1 2 3 4 5 6
- +

mw = 5.7

Overall Assessment of Teaching Methods


1 2 3 4 5 6
- +

mw = 5.3

05.03.2009 Seite 13