You are on page 1of 7

1 RTCHARD (68048)

E. WTNNTE
COUNTYCOUNSEL
2 COUNTYOF ALAMEDA
a
J RICHARDS,WATSON& GERSHON
A ProfessionalCorporation
4 T. PETERPTERCE (160408)
SAYREWEAVER(1,16957) .
) 355SouthGrandAvenue,40'Floor
LosAngeles, CA 90071
6 Telephone: (213)626-8484
Facsimile:(213)626-0078
7 ppierce@nvglaw,com
I Attomeysfor Defendants,
MARY V. KING, ET AL.
9
l0 UNITED STATESDISTRICTCOURT
11 NORTHERNDISTRICT OF'CALIFORNIA
z.= t2
<)Ë
U I P
É , 4 t3 RUSSELLALLEN NORDYKE,ET AL., MJJ
CaseNo. C99-04389
L¡J 8
r-" ¿
z,= 1,4 Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
a
(/, g*
RELIEF TO AMEND ORDER
15 v. GRANTING DEFENDANTS'MOTION
k E FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
-=- Í 16 MARY V. K[NG, ET AI., DECLARATION OF T. PETERPIERCE
ul 5
ô E
vt
É,
< Zù T7 Defendants.
T
r J Ê DEPT.: ll
É . E 18 JLIDGE: HonorableMartinJ. Jenkins
'fs
¿v. T9
20 to LocalRule7-11,Defendants
Pursuant "Coun$') move
MaryV. King, et al. (hereafter

2l this Courtfor an Orderslightly amendingthe"OrderGrantingDefendants'Motion for Summary


22 filed March 31,2007andreceivedby theCounty's counselon April 17, 2007.
Judgment"
23 Lr the "Order GrantingDefendants'Motion for SummaryJudgtnent"(hereafter"Order"),
24 in thecontextof a gun
theCourtstatesthat"the Countydoesnotcontestthatgunpossession
25 showmayinvolvecertainelements speech."(Order,pageg,lines7-8). Immediately
of protected
26 is footnote12which,in its penultimate
followingthatsentence statesthattheCounty
sentence,

27 hasmadea "concession" in thecontextof a gunshowmayinvolvecertain


thatgunpossession
28 ilt

MOTION FORADMINISTRATIVE RELIEFTO AMEND ORDERGRANTINGMOTION FORSTJMMARYJI.JDGMENT


r206r\0002\968549.1
I of protectedspeech.Lateron pageg(at line20),theOrderagainusestheword
elements
2 "concession."
a
J notesthatin its brieß submittedin supportof its Motionfor
TheCountyrespectfully
4 arguendofor thepu{posesof its motionthatgun
SummaryJudgment,the Countyassumed
5 in thecontextof a gunshowmayinvolveelements
possession (seeCounty's
of protectedspeech

6 Assumingapropositionforthesakeofan
ReplyBriefatpagel,line28throughpage2,linel).
7 that
argumentis very differentfrom concedingthatproposition.The Countyis veryconcerned
I theOrder,ascunentlyworded,couldbeusedagainsttheCountyin a futurecase.Forexample,
9 if anothervendorwho conductedgunshowswereto mountan as-appliedchallengeto the
10 County'sOrdinance,the vendorcouldreferto theOrderaspresentlywritten andtakethe
1l positionthattheCountyhasconceded in thecontextof a gun
for all timethatgunpossession
z.= t2 speech.TheCountyhasnot madeanysuchconcession.
of protected
showmayinvolveelements
o É
- É
ø ) 9
æ. e. 13 TheCountyrespectfullyrequeststhattheCourtamendits Orderto reflectthattheCounty
trj3
,Ð=
- = t4 for the sakeof argumentfor purposesof its Motion for SummaryJudgmentthatgun
assumed
ã B
¿ñE of protectedspeech.TheCounty
15 in thecontextof a gunshowmayinvolveelements
possession
k= Í r
- - 16 lodgeda proposed
hasseparately Orderto thateffect.
ø t 5
ô E
& ø T7
<
- =à
U 9 DATED: Api124,2007 RICHARDE. WINNIE
E e 18 COUNTYCOUNSEL
-'tl9 COUNTYOF ALAMEDA
I',..
l& 19
RICHARDS,V/ATSON& GERSHON
20 A ProfessionalCorporation
SAYRE TWEAVER
2l
22
23
Attorneys for Defendants
24 MARY V. K[NG, ET AI.

25
26
27
28
-2-
MOTIONFORADMINISTRATIVERELIEFTO AMENDORDERGRANTINGMOI'ION FORSUMMARYJTIDGMENT
12061\0002\968549.
I
I DECLARATION OF T. PETERPIERCE
2 I, T. PeterPierce,declare:
3 1. I aman attorneyadmittedto practicein the Stateof Californiaandbeforethis Court,andI
4 amtheattorneyprimarily responsiblefor representing in this action. I havepersonal
defendants

5 knowledgeof them¿tterssetforth herein.


6 April 24,2007,atapproximately
2. On Tuesday, counsel,
opposing
9:00a.m.,I telephoned

7 Courtstaffabouttheprocess
DonaldKilmer,Jr.,Esq.,andnotifiedhim thatI hadcontacted of

8 MotionFor SummaryJudgment.I explained


seekingto amendtheOrderGrantingDefendants'
9 to Mr. Kilmer thenatureof the amendment wereseekingandwhy theywereseeking
defendants

10 to seekan
it. Mr. Kilmerinformedme thathethoughtitwouldbeimproperfor defendants
tl a¡rdthat he would determinewhetherto file anyoppositionafterhereceivedthe
amendment
z. =. 12 motion. I amcausingtheadministativemotionto be servedon Mr. Kilmerboth
administrative
o =
Ðfl 13 by facsimile(concurrentlywith of the
filing) andmail. I amalsoe-mailinga courtesycopy
t¡J I
l-a9= t4 motionto Mr. Kilmer concurrentlywithfiling.
ã e
¿ñË 15 I declareunderpenaþ of perjuryunderthelawsof theUnitedStatesof Americathatthe
k E
-=. i t6 foregoingis trueandcorrect.
Ø 5
ô k
á .* t7 on April 24,2007at LosAngeles,California.
Executed
+ =
L , 9
É . E
-lQ
r8
¡'r.
.!3. 19
20
2l
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
MOTIONFORSUMMARYruDGMENT
MOTIONFORADMIMSTRATIVERELIEFTO AMENDORDERGRANTTNG
I
12061\0002\968549.
1 PROOF OF SERVICE

2 I, kina Berman,declare:
a
J I atn aresidentof the Stateof Califomiaandoverthe ageof eighteenyears,and
notapartytothewithinaction;mybusinessaddressisRichards,.Watson-&Gershon'44
4 MontþomeryStreet,Suite3800,SanFrancisco, Californiag4l}4-48l1. On April 24'2007,I
servedthe within documents:
5
MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO AMEND ORDER
6 GRANTING DEF'ENDANTS'MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
DECLARATION OF T. PETER PIERCE
7
IPROPOSEDIORDER AMENDING ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS'
8 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

9
I of the document(s)listedaboveftom (415)_421,-
by causingfacsimiletransmission
84gOto the person(s)andfacsimilenumber(s)setforth below on this datebefore
5:00P.M. This transmissionwasreportedascompleteandwithout error.

I by placingthe document(s) listedabovein a sealedenvelopewith postagethereon


niUyprepãid,in theUnited Statesmail at SanFrancisco,Californiaaddressed as
setforthbelow. I am readilyfamiliarwith the firm'spracticefor collectionand
processingcorrespondence for mailingwith theUnited StatesPostalService.
Underthal practice,it would be depositedwith theU.S. PostalServiceon that
samedaywith postagethereonfully prepaidin the ordinarycourseof business.I
am awaiethat on motionof thepartyserved,serviceis presumedinvalid if postal
cancellationdateor postagemeferdateis morethanoneday afterdateof deposit
for mailine containedin this affidavit.

VIA FACSIMILEAND FIRSTCLASSMAIL

Donald E.J. Kilmer, Esq.


Law Offrces of Donald Kilmer
1645Willow Street,Suite 150
SanJose,CA95125
Fax: 408/264-8487
20
2T
I declareunder penalty of perjury under the laws of the Stateof California that the
22 above is true and correct.

23
24
Executedon April 24,2007.

(" 'B
25 kina Berman
26
27
28
1
2
J

4
f

6
7
8
TI\ITHE UI\IITED STATESDISTRICT COURT
9
F'ORTIIE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIX'ORNIA
t0
11
RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE, ET AL., MJJ
CaseNo. C99-04389
z,= t2
o Ë
pa Plaintiffs. IPROPOSEDIORDERAMENDING
l¡l8
13 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS'
o = v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY
2,9 t4 JTIDGMENT
MARY V. KING, ET AL,
PH
= i
- 3
15
16
Defendants.
DEPT.:
JUDGE:
II
HonorableMartinJ. Jenkins
t n S
ô k
É
< È
q
t7
-L ' r P
É, =, 18 The Court, after considering defendants'Motion for Adminisfrative Relief to Amend
-*
, l¡9
,,. EØ. 19 Order Granting Defendantsl Motion for SummaryJudgment,and after consideringany

20 oppositionfiled by plaintiffs, ordérsas follows:

2l The sentencebeginning on line 7 on page9 of the Order Granting Defendants' Motion for

22 for the sakeof argument that


SummaryJudgmentis amendedto read: "Here, the County ¿rssumes

23 grm possessionin the context of a gun show may involve certainelementsof protectedspeech."

24 The penultimatesentencein footnote 12 onpage9of the Order GrantingDefendants'

25 Motion for SummaryJudgmentis amendedto read:"Due to the County's assumption;the Court

26 finds that the content of the remainisg declarationsis inelevant to the remaining issues."

27 The introductory clauseof the sentencebeginning on line 20 on page9 of the Order

28 GrantingDefendants'Motion for SummaryJudgmentis amendedto read:"ln light of the

[PROPOSED]ORDERAMENDING ORDERGRANTINGDEFENDANTS'MOTION FOR STJMMARYJUDGMENT


r206r\0002\968574.
r
I County's¿rssumption
for the sakeof argumert,. . ."
2 IT IS SO ORDERED.
J
DATED:
4 MARTIN J. JENKINS
UNITEDSTATESDISTRICTJUDGE
)

6
7
I
9
10
11

6= 12
pa l3
rl¡8
teË
2,9 l4
8E 15
k E
= i
- 3
.Jr 5
r6
A E
d . q
< È t7
!¿Ê
e,-< 18
-.ég2
I zg, 19
20
2T
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IPROPOSED] ORDERAMENDINCORDERGRANTINGDEFENDANTS'MOTIONFOR SUMMARYJUDGMENT


1206r\0002\968574.
I
1 PROOF OF'SERVICE

2 I, kina Berman, declare:

J I am a residentof the Stateof California and over the age of eighteenyears,and


not a party to the within action; my businessaddressis Richards, Watson_&Gershon,4! _ _
4 MontþomeryStreet,Suite3300,SanFrancisco,Califomia94l04-4811. OnApril24,2007,I
servedthe within documents:
5
MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO AMEND ORDER
GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
DECLARATION OF'T. PETER PIERCE

IPROPOSEDI ORDER AMENDING ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS'


MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

T by causing facsimile transmissionof the document(s)listed above lrom (415)-421-


8486 to the person(s)and facsimile number(s)set forth below on this date before
5:00 P.M. this transmissionwas reported as complete and without error.

r by placing the document(s)listed above in a sealedenvelopewith postagethereon


fülþ prepãd, in the United Statesmail at San Francisco,Califomia addressedas
set Íbrthbelow. I am readily familiar with the firm's practice for collection and
processingcorrespondencefor mailing with the United StatesPostal Service.
Under that practice, it would be depositedwith the U.S. Postal Serviceon that
sameday wìth postagethereonfully prepaid in the ordinary courseof business. I
am awaie that òn motion of the party served,service is presumedinvalid if postal
cancellation date or postagemefer date is more than one day after date of deposit
for mailing containedin this affidavit.

VIA FACSIMILE AND FIRST CLASS MAIL

DonaldE.J.Kilmer,Esq.
Law Officesof DonaldKilmer
1645V/illow Street,Suite150
SanJose,CA95125
Fax: 4081264-8487

I declareunder,penaltyof perjury under the laws of the Stateof California that the
above is true and correct.

Executedon April 24,2007;

kinaBerman