You are on page 1of 35

# The HK Polytechnic University '

## 1 Power System Stability

A large power system consists of a number of synchronous machines operating
in synchronism synchronous generators located at great and small distances apart and of varied ratings and characteristics have to continuously operate at the same frequency (electrical speed = pole pairs mechanical speed).

It is necessary that they should maintain synchronism despite the ever present
1 disturbances induced by nature and by man load changes, switching actions, faults and so on.

When the system is subject to some form of disturbance, there is a tendency for
the system to develop forces to bring it to a normal or stable condition. The ability of a system to reach a normal or stable condition after being disturbed is call stability.

Synchronous stability may be divided into two main categories depending upon & '
the magnitude of the disturbance steady-state, dynamic and transient stability.

## The steady-state stability is the ability of a system to bring it to a stable

condition after a small disturbance. The study of steady-state stability is basically concerned with the effect of gradual innitesimal power changes and the dynamics of rotating machines will be excluded from the studies.

% \$

However in practice the dynamics of rotating machines will be effected even the
increase in load is gradual. Dynamic stability is an extension of steady-state stability where the dynamic effects of synchronous machines and automatic 2 control devices such as governors and voltage regulators are included. The dynamic stability is concerned with small disturbances lasting for a long time and in dynamic stability studies non-linearities are neglected.

## The transient stability is the ability of a system to bring it to a stable condition

after a large disturbance. Transient stability is concerned with sudden and large changes in the network conditions. The large disturbances can occur due to sudden changes in application or removal of loads, line switching operations,

KWCn v2.2

&

% 1

## A mechanical analog of power system transient stability is given in the gure

below, in which a number of masses representing synchronous machines are interconnected by a network of elastic strings representing transmission lines.

When one of the strings is cut, representing the loss of a transmission line, the masses undergo transient oscillations and the forces on the strings uctuate. The system will then either settle down to a new steady-state operating point or additional strings will break, resulting in an even weaker network and eventual

& '

system collapse.

2 Stability Limits
The stability limit is the maximum power that can be transferred in a network
between sources and loads without loss of synchronism.

% \$

The steady-state stability limit is the maximum power that can be transferred
without the system becoming unstable under steady-state conditions. 4

The dynamic stability limit is the maximum power that can be transferred without
the system becoming unstable under small disturbances lasting for a long time.

The transient stability limit is the maximum power that can be transferred without
the system becoming unstable when a sudden or large disturbance occurs.

In general, the transient stability limit is the lowest whilst the steady-state limit is
the largest. i.e. transient stability limit < dynamic stability limit < steady-state stability limit

KWCn v2.2

&

% 2

## 3 Synchronism and Steady-State Stability

3.1 Two Finite Machines

First consider case of two identical unloaded machines that are subsequently
disturbed.
E1 Ic E2 E1 Ic E1 E2 Ic= E1 - E 2 E2

E1 - E 2 2jX

## Say some disturbance occurs that causes generator 1 to accelerate with

respect to generator 2. Observed that power comes out of the faster machine terminals and passes into the slower machine terminals. The disturbance is

& '

## corrected, opposed and (hopefully) overcome.

Suppose the machines were initially loaded and equally sharing a load. Apart
from losses, both machines would have a mechanical input equal to the electrical output.
E1 I1 X Ic X I 1 = I2 I2 E1 Ic I2 E2 E1 - E 2 E2 I1

% \$

E1

E2

Once again say the same disturbance causing generator 1 to accelerate with
respect to generator 2 were to occur. The effects of this are shown in the above gure. As can be seen, the main effect is to increase the electrical burden on the faster machine and to reduce it on the slower machine. The resulting power unbalance with respect to mechanical input tends to correct the disturbance.

KWCn v2.2

&

The power ow between the generators is called the synchronous power ow.

% 3

## 3.2 Innite Bus

In a power system, normally more than two generators operate in parallel. The
machines may be located at different places. A group of machines located at one place may be treated as a single large machine. Also, the machines not connected to the same bus but separated by lines of low reactance, may be grouped into one large machine. 7

The operation of one machine connected in parallel with such a large system
comprising many other machines is of great interest. The capacity of the system is so large that its voltage and frequency may be taken constant. The connection or disconnection of a single small machine on such a system would not affect the magnitude and phase of the voltage and frequency.

## Such a system of constant voltage and constant frequency regardless of the

load is called innite busbar system or simply innite bus. Physically it is not

& '

## 3.3 Single Machine on Innite Bus

The stability problem can be studied with an analysis of the behaviour of a synchronous generator through a line to an innite busbar as shown below.

% \$

jX E
8 where

Infinite Bus

V0

V = phase voltage of the innite bus E = excitation phase voltage of the generator X = total synchronous reactance from the source to innite bus = load angle, i.e. phase angle between V and E EV sin X

and the power transfer P from the generator to the innite bus is given by

KWCn v2.2

&

P =

% 4

= 90o , i.e.

Pmax =

EV X
(3.3.1)

## and the power transfer can be rewritten as

P = Pmax sin
9

Equation (3.3.1) represents the steady-state stability limit of the power system. It is clean from the equation that steady-state stability limit Pmax can be increased by 1. Increasing system voltages E or V : by increasing the excitation 2. Decreasing system reactance X by : use of double-circuit line use of bundled conductors series compensation of the reactance use of machines of low impedances In fact, increasing steady-state stability limit by decreasing reactance is economical

& '

## and also effective.

% \$

The graphical representation of power received P and the load angle is called the power-angle diagram as shown below. 1. Magnitude of magnitude of . 2. There is a maximum limit to the power 10 that can be extracted from a generator for given E , V and X . 3. The sign of the output power depends on the sign of (Generating/Motoring). 4. There is a stable range of operation from
-Pmax
-180 -90

P (output) depends on

P Pmax

Generator
90 180

Motor

## = -90o to = 90o and stable operation

is not possible outside this range.

% 5

KWCn v2.2

&

## 3.4 Synchronizing Power (and Torque) Coefcient

The system is stable if and only if for an increase in rotor angle (load) the

transmitted power also increases, i.e. the dP d should be positive. The rate dP d is called the synchronizing power coefcient and is taken as the measure of the stability of a system, i.e. 11 synchronizing power coefcient,

ps =

dP = Pmax cos d

## Hence, the steady-state synchronous stability criterion for a simple system is

ps > 0, i.e. the synchronizing power coefcient is positive. The steady-state stability limit is reached when ps = 0 and if ps < 0, then system is unstable.
If 0 is the synchronous speed, then synchronizing torque coefcient,

ts =

& '

Pmax ps = cos 0 0

## 4 Synchronous Machine Models

4.1 The Voltage Behind Synchronous Reactance Model

% \$

## The previous model in which X = Xs the synchronous reactance is true only

for slowly changing conditions. Since resistance is neglected, there should be no signicant transmission line length prior to connection to a large busbar system. Since saliency is neglected, the machine should be of cylindrical pole 12 construction.

Most of these assumptions are rarely true. The most unsatisfactory one is
regarding slow changes. This assumption is not acceptable for transient and dynamic stability studies.

jXg jX l Rl
Infinite Bus

KWCn v2.2

&

V 0o

% 6

Let Z

## = R + jX be the total impedance where

R = Rl X = Xg + X l
and Z

## The power transferred can be obtained as 13

EV sin( + ) P= |Z | EV = sin( + ) |Z |
line.
jXg E

V2 sin |Z | V2 R |Z |

where

sin =

R |Z |

If the line is long enough, it may be necessary to incorporate a T or model for the
y12 V 0o E y11 y22 V 0o

& '

By well known methods of network reduction the circuit can be reduced to a single equivalent as shown in the above gure with all circuit quantities being shown in admittance form. Now, since

% \$

I1 I2

## where 14 Hence, where

Y11 = y12 + y11 ; Y12 = Y21 = y12 and Y22 = y12 + y22 P = EV |Y12 | sin( + ) + E 2 G12 Y12 = |Y12 |/90o and G12 = Re(Y12 )

Y11 Y21

Y12 Y22

E/ V /0
o

## 4.3 The Voltage Behind Transient Reactance Model

None of the previous models are really satisfactory because they overlook the fact that during the rst one or two seconds after a disturbance the ux linkages of the eld circuit cannot be easily altered. For a much shorter period the same is true of

KWCn v2.2

&

the ux linkages of the damper circuits and solid rotor iron also.

% 7

## Transient Stability Analysis

Hence for transient and dynamic stability studies a more sophisticated machine model is required.

X
The equivalent circuit and phasor diagram for a cylindrical pole rotor machine are shown. 15
Since Xd

R V

## power-angle curve is much higher than the steady-state one.

EV P = sin Xd
o / I

E V

IR

IX

& '

5 Transient Stability
The steady-state stability limit does not provide a useful indication because the
actual disturbance that occur in power systems can be very large (faults, loss of generators, line switching, major load changes, etc.) and the system should be operated to be stable through these events.

% \$

## The transient stability is the ability of a system to maintain synchronous

16 operation and to reach a stable state (or the one close to it) after a large disturbance.

Different utiilies may specify different criterion disturbances. For example the
criterion disturbance could be a 3-phase short circuit which is cleared by circuit breaker operation in a time corresponding to the system fault clearing time.

## The severity of a disturbance and the stability limit depend on

1. system and generator conditions (voltages, impedances, etc.)

KWCn v2.2

&

% 8

## Transient Stability Analysis

3. control loops such as AVRs and governors 4. mechanical factors such as boiler and hydraulic time constants 5. load characteristics

Under normal operations, the relative position of the rotor axis and stator
magnetic eld axis is xed. The angle between the two is known as the load or rotor angle and depends upon the loading of the machine. 17

The problem of stability revolves around the determination of whether or not the torque and rotor angle will stabilize after a sudden disturbance. In case continues to increase after a disturbance the machine will lose synchronism. In order to determine the angular displacement between the generating units of
a power system following a major disturbance, it is necessary to solve a set of differential equations, called the swing equations, describing the motion of the

& '

rotors.

## 5.1 Swing Equation

In a synchronous generator the input is the mechanical or shaft torque Tm and the

% \$

output is the electrical torque Te . If the losses are neglected the difference between the mechanical torque and the electrical torque is equal to the accelerating or decelerating torque Ta , i.e.

Ta = Tm Te
18 If J is the moment of inertia of the rotor and is the angular acceleration, the motion of the rotor can be expressed as:

Ta = Tm Te = J
Let

be the angular position of the rotor at any instant t, be the corresponding angular displacement of the rotor and , s be the angular velocity and synchronous velocity respectively. = s t + d d = s + = dt dt d2 d2 = 2 = 2 dt dt % 9

KWCn v2.2

&

## Hence, the rotor motion equation can be written as:

Tm Te = J d2 or Pm Pe = M = M 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5.1.1) dt where Pm = Tm the mechanical power Pe = Te the electrical power M = J the angular momentum
Equation (5.1.1) is known as the swing equation and describes the behaviour of a synchronous machine during transients. As the angular momentum M is proportional to the angular velocity, it is not constant but varies somewhat during the swings due to variation in . In practice, the change in from the normal system angular velocity s is not much during the swing and it is commonly assumed that M is constant and is equal to Js . This

19

& '

## value of M is known as the inertia constant of the machine.

Another important constant denoted by H and is dened as the ratio of the kinetic stored energy in megajoules rating in MVA

% \$

energy at rated speed to the rated apparent power of the machine, i.e.

H=

MWs/MVA or MJ/MVA

H is also sometimes called as inertia constant. A relation between M and H is derived as follows: 20
1 GH = energy stored = 1 2 M = 2 M 2f

or

M=

GH f

where G is the rating of the machine in MVA and f is the system frequency. Note M depends upon the size of the machine as well as on its type whereas

H does not vary widely with size and has a characteristic value or set of values
for each class of machines. Substituting M in Equation (5.1.1): or in per unit

KWCn v2.2

&

% 10

## Transient Stability Analysis

where f0 is the rated (synchronous) frequency. Hence for a N multi-machine system, the swing equations are

## Hi d2 = Pmi Pei f0 dt2

for i

= 1, 2, ... , N

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5.1.3)

Damping has been ignored in the derivation of the above relation. The solution of 21 Equation (5.1.3) provides the values of with respect to time t which when plotted gives the swing curve. Thus, for a multi-machine system, there will be a swing curve for each generator and the transient stability of the system is assessed by observing the angular difference between each pair of generators. If the difference is found to be decreasing after all switching operations are over, the system will be generally stable and the oscillation will be successively damped out. However, it is possible that the units may go out of synchronism after withstanding

& '

## the rst swing successfully multi-swing stability.

Swing curves provide information regarding stability and show any tendency of to oscillate and/or increase beyond the point of return.
Unstable Unstable

% \$

22

Stable

## Stable t t Multi-swing stability

First-swing stability

Swing curves are also useful in determining the adequacy of relay protection on power system with regard to the clearing of faults before one or more machines become unstable and fall out of synchronism. The critical clearing time is found to

KWCn v2.2

&

% 11

## Transient Stability Analysis

Example 5.1.1
A 50Hz, 20 MVA, 13.2kV generator has an inertia constant H = 9 MWs/MVA. Determine : a) the K.E. stored in the rotor at synchronous speed. b) the acceleration if the net mechanical input power is 18 MW and the electrical power developed is 15 MW.

23

c) the change in rotor angle for a period of 15 cycles with rotor acceleration being constant. Solution: a) K.E. stored in the rotor in megajoules

## = H machine rating in MVA = 9 20 = 180 MJ & '

b) The accelerating power, Pa

= Pm Pe = 18 15 = 3 MW

## Now the acceleration is

% \$

d2 Pa = where dt2 M

M=

GH 20 9 = = 1.146 MJsec/rad fo 50

## d d2 = 2 = 2.618 = 2.618 t rad/sec dt dt

and

KWCn v2.2

&

d = = 2.618 t = 1.309 t2 rad dt 15 = 0.3 sec Period of 15 cycles = 50 Hence, = 1.309 0.32 = 0.11781 rad = 6.75 deg

% 12

## 5.2 Transient Stability Assessment

For a two machine system under the assumption of constant input, no damping and constant voltage behind transient reactance, the machines either fall out of step in the rst swing or never. Under this condition the two machines are said to be running at standstill with respect to each other. There is a graphical method of determining whether the two machines are running

25

at standstill with respect to each other or not. This method is known as Equal Area Criterion for stability. The use of this method eliminates partially or wholly the calculation of swing curves which thus saves a considerable amount of work. The Equal Area Criterion method is applicable to any two machine systems which satises the above assumption. It is not applicable to a multi-machine system directly or if the critical clearing time is required to be determined. In such case, step-by-step (or point-by-point) method may be used for numerical solution of swing

& '

equations.

## 5.3 Equal Area Criterion

The equal area criterion may be used to assess the transient stability of two machine system or one machine connected to an innite bus without actually solving the swing equation. It is derived using the swing equation given as:

% \$

d2 = Pa = Pm Pe dt2 d2 d dt = dt2 dt
2

## d and integrating w.r.t. time: dt

2M

2(Pm Pe ) (Pm Pe )d

d dt dt

or

d dt

=2
0

or

d = dt

2 M

(Pm Pe )d + constant
0

KWCn v2.2

&

% 13

## Transient Stability Analysis

Also when t = 0, d dt

## = 0 and = 0 , i.e. the constant term in the above equation = 0 or when

is zero. The angle will stop changing and the machine will again be operating at synchronous speed after a disturbance when d dt
(Pm 0

Pe )d = 0 =

Pa d

This means that the area under the curve Pa should be zero. This condition is possible only when Pa is both accelerating and decelerating powers. 27 For a generator action

Ps > Pe for positive area A1 and Pe > Ps for negative area A2 for stable

P -ve Ps A2 A1 +ve Pe

operation. Hence the name equal area criterion. The area A1 represents the kinetic energy stored by the rotor during acceleration and the area

A2
0

represents the kinetic energy given up by the rotor to the system and when it is all given up, the

& '

## machine has returned to its original speed.

Consider the following sequence of events. A generator working initially and stably at an input = output =

% \$

P0 operating point with torque angle 0 is subjected to a sudden increase of input to level P1 . The generator should settle down to new stable operation at P1 , 1 .
1. Rotor begins to accelerate 2. Point

## P1 , 1 reached and there is power

28

balance but the large rotor mass is overspeed 3. The rotor runs past P1 , 1 4. The output commences

P P1 P0

X
a

## > input therefore deceleration

0 1

5a. At some point such as X , speed has fallen again to synchronous speed s but there is no power balance (P1

> Pe ) % 14

KWCn v2.2

&

6a. Speed falls below s and the rotor comes back downwards P1 , 1

## Transient Stability Analysis

7a. The next time P1 , 1 is reached though power balance and exits again with the rotor mass being underspeed

8a. The rotor runs below P1 , 1 but acceleration commences again 9a. If damping is taken into account, the rotor oscillates about P1 , 1 and settles down to a stable operation Alterative scenario unstable case: 29 5b. The rotor runs past the steady-state stability limit before speed falls to synchronous value 6b. The rotor reaches point Y before speed falls to synchronous value 7b. Output falls below input again 8b. The overspeed rotor begins to accelerate again

& '

## 9b. Synchronism is lost

In summary, the equal area criterion makes the following assumptions or approximations: 1. Neglects electro-magnetic, electrical (I 2 R) and mechanical damping 2. Neglects control loops such as AVRs and governors 3. Assumes constant power input

% \$

None of these are generally true or small. Hence the equal area criterion is 30 pessimistic i.e. over-estimates the extent of the expected swing.

## 5.4 Applications of the Equal Area Criterion

5.4.1 Step increase in input power Limit of rst swing given by A1

= A2 . A3 .

P P1 A1 P0

A3 A2

KWCn v2.2

&

0 1

% 15

## Transient Stability Analysis

Now what is the maximum value of the P1 such that the system is critically stable, i.e. any attempt to increase P1 beyond this value the system becomes unstable ? Referring to the power-angle curve plot

## P1 = Pmax sin 1 = Pmax sin m

m = ( 1 ) = 1 .

The value of 1 with this condition is known as critical torque angle c , i.e. c 31 Also the following condition should be satised for A1
m

= A3 :

P1 (m 0 ) =
0

Pmax sin d

## Pmax sin m (m 0 ) = Pmax (cos 0 cos m )

Here m is the only unknown which can be obtained and hence the critical P1 can be calculated. It is to be noted that 0 must lie within the steady-state limit, i.e. 0

## < 90o , but 1 % \$

& '

may be greater than 90o as long as the equal area criterion is satised.

5.4.2 Sustained network fault Line switching Consider a system represent by a synchronous generator connected to an innite busbar by a double-circuit line. The two circuits are connected in parallel.
Generator Line 1

Line 2

32 If one of the circuits is switched out the system may become unstable in spite of the fact that the load could be supplied over by the other circuit under steady-state conditions. Applying the equal area criterion: Limit of rst swing given by A1

P
A1

A3

P0 P1

A2

= A2 . A3 .

0 1

KWCn v2.2

&

% 16

## Transient Stability Analysis

5.4.3 Network fault subsequently cleared Faulted line Suppose that a fault occurs on one of the two parallel circuits connecting to an innite busbar system.

Generator

Line 1

fault
33

Line 2
The faults produces a transient change which may render the system unstable. However, if the circuit breakers clear the fault in time, it is possible to maintain stability. The maximum value of time allowed for protective gear to operate without loss of stability is called the critical clearing time. The torque angle corresponding to this time is called critical clearing angle. Let cl be the value of at which the fault is cleared.

& '

## = A2 and the condition for stability by A1 A3 .

Observe the inuence of both severity and duration of fault on stability. This also shows the need for fast protection relaying and circuit breaker clearing of faults. On important e.h.v. or h.v. systems, 0.5 to 1 cycle operation of protection and 1 to 3 cycle circuit breaker clearing is now possible to achieve. Let the three power angle curves (PACs) be represented as

% \$

## Pmax r2Pmax P0 r1Pmax

A1 A2

Pre-fault PAC

A3
Post-fault PAC Faulted PAC

34

cl

= A3
m cl

0 cl m
r2 Pmax sin d

P0 (m 0 ) =
0

r1 Pmax sin d +

KWCn v2.2

&

% 17

## Transient Stability Analysis

Substituting P0

= Pmax sin 0 and rearranging the above equation into: (m 0 ) sin 0 r1 cos 0 + r2 cos m r2 r1 P0 = Pmax sin 0 = r2 Pmax sin( m ) sin 0 r2

cos cl =

## Also from the curves: or 35

m = sin1

Example 5.4.1
1.2pu j0.3 j0.15 1pu j0.25 j0.15 1pu j0.15

P
Generator j0.15

fault

j0.25

j0.15

Infinite System

All impedances are given in ohms. Determine the critical clearing angle for the

& '

generator for a 3- fault at the point P when the generator is delivering 1 pu power.

% \$

## before the fault : during the fault :

Xpre = 0.3 +

0.55 2

+ 0.15 = 0.725 pu

Xf lt = ZA B = = = 3.133 pu

36

## i.e. The maximum power output is given as

before the fault : during the fault : & after the fault :

EV Xpre EV Xf lt

= =

EV Xpost

1.21.0 1.0

KWCn v2.2

## And the value of

0.383 Pmax1 = = 0.23 Pmax 1.667 Pmax2 1.2 r2 = = = 0.72 Pmax 1.667 The rotor angle, 0 , when the system is operating normally r1 = Pmax sin 0 = 1 pu 0 = sin1
1 1.667

1 1.2

37

## sin( m ) = Pmax sin 0 = 123.6o = 2.156 rad

Pmax2 sin m = 1 pu

m = sin1

cos cl = =

## (m 0 ) sin 0 r1 cos 0 + r2 cos m r2 r1

(2.156 0.643) 0.6 0.23 0.8 0.72 0.553 0.72 0.23 cl = 48.35o & '
5.5 Step-by-Step (Point-by-Point) Method

% \$

The equal area criterion (EAC) method is useful in determining the critical
clearing angle, i.e. the condition when the system will be stable provided the fault is cleared before the rotor angle exceeds the critical clearing angle.

However the EAC method provides little information on the critical clearing time
which is important for setting up the operation times of the relay and circuit 38 breaker such that the total time taken by them would less than the critical clearing time for stable operation of the system.

## The step-by-step or point-by-point method is the method which can determine

the critical fault clearing time. This method can also be used for the solution of multimachine system. At present, it still is one of the most practical avaliable methods of transient stability analysis for power systems with controls.

Because this method involves the calculations of the rotor angles as time is &
incremented, it is also referred to as the time domain simulation method.

KWCn v2.2

% 19

## Transient Stability Analysis

Numerical integration techniques are used to solve the swing equations. Each swing curve ( t) is then plotted to check its tendency to remain stable.

## The step-by-step calculations can be made by hand, the ac network analyser or

the digital computer. The accuracy of the solution depends upon the time incremnet used in the analysis. As the time interval is decreased, the computed swing curves approach the ture curve. 39

As the step-by-step method calculates the change in the angular position of the
rotor during a short interval of time (milliseconds), the following assumptions are commonly made during the computational procedure.
1. The accelerating power Pa and the angular acceleration ( d dt2 ) computed at
2

the beginning of an interval is assumed to be constant from the middle of the preceding interval to the middle of the interval under consideration. 2. The angular velecity computed at the middle of an interval remains

& '
Pa Pa(n-2) Pa(n-1) Pa(n)

## constant over the interval.

calculation point

## region assumed constant

% \$

Assumed Actual

w(n)

(n) (n-1)

40

n-2

n-1

time step

n-2

n-1

time step

n-2

n-1

time step

The above assumptions are not strictly correct, since is changing continuously and both Pa and depend upon . However, they are acceptable if time increment t is made small.
5.5.1 Simple Step-by-Step Numerical Integation

KWCn v2.2

&

% 20

## Transient Stability Analysis

The procedure for the n-th interval is outlined below: 1. Evaluate the accelerating power

## Pa(n1) = Pm(n1) Pe(n1)

1 d2 = = Pa(n1) 2. From the swing equation (n) dt2 M where is the acceleration, evaluate (n) .
3. The change in angular velocity for the n-th interval is 41

(n) = (n) t
Hence,

## (n) = (n1) + (n) = (n1) + (n) t = 0.

Here is the relative angular velocity and is zero at t 4. The change in rotor angle for the n-th interval is

(n) = (n) t = [(n1) + (n) ]t = (n1) + (n) t = (n1) + (n) (t)2 & '
Hence,

## (n) = (n1) + (n) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5.5.1)

Equation (5.5.1) forms the basis of the numerical solution by step-by-step method. The accelerating power (based on the powers calculated for last interval) is calculated at the beginning of each new interval. In other words, once the value of (n) obtained from this equation, it forms one point on the swing curve and will be used for evaluating the accelerating power Pa(n+1) and the procedure will be repeated during the subsequent intervals.

% \$

42 where and

## = constant for classical modelling

Once the swing curve is plotted and the critical clearing time, corresponding to the critical clearing angle as obtained by using the equal area criterion, can be determined and a suitable protection scheme can be designed to avoid the system

KWCn v2.2

&

% 21

## Transient Stability Analysis

Example 5.5.1
Three-phase fault takes place at B as shown in the gure below with all line impedances being given in . The breakers at A and B operate simultaneously. The generator has an inertia constant H = 4.0 and it is delivering 1.0 pu power before the fault takes place. Use a time step of 0.05 sec.
Generator j0.25 j0.12 1.1pu j0.3 Infinite Bus

43

fault A B

j0.035 1pu

1. Determine the critical fault clearing angle. 2. Determine the critical clearing time. 3. Plot the swing curves both under sustained fault and when the breakers have

& '

## operated at the end of 10 cycles, i.e. 0.2 s.

Solution : 1. Critical clearing angle calculation: Pre-fault reactance between the buses

% \$

## Xpre = 0.12 + 0.25//0.3 + 0.035 = 0.29136

Post-fault reactance between the buses

## Xpost = 0.12 + 0.25 + 0.035 = 0.405

44 Maximum power delivered :

when the system is operating normally EV .11.0 Pmax = X =1 0.29136 = 3.775 pu pre during the fault Pmax1 = 0 pu after the breakers operate EV 11.0 Pmax2 = X = 1. 0.405 = 2.716 pu post & r1 =
Pmax1 Pmax

= 0 & r2 =

Pmax2 Pmax

2.716 3.775

= 0.7194

KWCn v2.2

% 22

## The rotor angle, 0 , when the system is operating normally

Pmax sin 0 = 1 pu

## When the system critically stable, Pmax2 i.e.

Pmax2 sin m = 1 pu

cos cl = =

## (2.763 0.2649) 0.2649 0.7194 0.9297 0.7194 o cl = 90.62

2. Critical clearing time determination:

& '

M=

## GH 1.0 4 1 = = sec2 /deg f 180 50 2250

First interval: Since the power transmitted is 0 once the fault applied while the shaft power is 1, the average value of the power in the rst interval is (case 2 discontinuity):

% \$

P a0 =
Or 46

Pa0 + Pa0+ (1.0 1.0) + (1.0 0.0) = = 0.5 pu 2 2 Pa 0 = 0 = 0.5 2250 = 1125 deg/sec2 M 1 = 0 + 1 = 0.0 + 56.25 = 56.25 deg/sec
where 0 is the angular velocity of the rotor with respect to the 50 Hz reference axis and is therefore zero before the fault takes place.

&

KWCn v2.2

## Transient Stability Analysis

Second interval:

Or

Pa1 = 1.0 0.0 = 1.0 pu Pa 1 = 1 = 1.0 2250 = 2250 deg/sec2 M 2 = 1 t = 2250 0.05 = 112.5 deg/sec 2 = 1 + 2 = 56.25 + 112.5 = 168.75 deg/sec

47

## 2 = 2 t = 168.75 0.05 = 8.4375 deg 2 = 1 + 2 = 18.1725 + 8.4375 = 26.61 deg

Successive intervals:

Pa , and are the same as the second interval. = 281.25 deg/sec = 393.75 deg/sec = 506.25 deg/sec = 618.75 deg/sec = 731.25 deg/sec 3 4 5 6 7 = 40.66 deg = 60.34 deg = 85.65 deg = 116.58 deg = 153.14 deg

3 4 5 6 7 & '

= 2 + 3 = 3 + 4 = 4 + 5 = 5 + 6 = 6 + 7

% \$

&

48

## Critical clearing angle = 90.62 deg

0.2582 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 Time (s) 0.25 0.3 0.35
% 24

Hence, taken from the swing plot, the critical clearing time is 0.2582 sec.

KWCn v2.2

## Transient Stability Analysis

3. Swing curve plots: Once the circuit breaker is operated at the end of 0.2 s, the faulty section of the system will be isolate and the system will operate on the power characteristic:

## Pe = Pmax2 sin = 2.716 sin

And the average accelerated power becomes :

49

Or

Pa4 + Pa4+ 2 (1.0 0.0) + (1.0 2.716 sin 60.34) = = 0.18 pu 2 Pa 4 = 4 = 0.18 2250 = 405 deg/sec2 M 5 = 1 t = 405 0.05 = 20.25 deg/sec P a4 = 5 = 4 + 5 = 393.75 20.25 = 373.5 deg/sec 5 = 5 t = 373.5 0.05 = 18.67 deg 5 = 4 + 5 = 60.34 + 18.67 = 79.01 deg % \$

& '

Similarly,

6 7 8 9
160

6 7 8 9

## = 88.34 deg = 88.04 deg = 78.10 deg = 58.82 deg

Rotor Angle 140 120 Delta (deg) 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 Time (s)

50

KWCn v2.2

&

% 25

## Transient Stability Analysis

5.5.2 Discontinuities due to Network Changes A change in operating conditions causes a change in the value of Pa hence discontinuity occurs. Possible changes can be the removal of a fault or any line switching operations. Depending on the exact ocurring moment of the discontinuity, there are 3 possible cases. 1. The discontinuity occurs at the middle of an interval this is simplest as no

51

## special procedure is required.

Pa Pa(n-2) Pa(n-1) Discontinuity Pa Pa(n-2) Pa(n-1) Pa(n) Pa(n) Discontinuity

n-2

n-1

& '

Case 1

time step

n-2

n-1

Case 2

time step

2. The discontinuity occurs at the beginning of the interval an average values of the accelerating powers Pa(n) and Pa(n)+ will be used instead, i.e.
1 Pa(n) = 2 (Pa(n) + Pa(n)+ )

% \$

where Pa(n) and Pa(n)+ is the accelerating power immediately before and after the change, e.g. clearing the fault. 3. The discontinuity occurs at some other than the beginning or the middle of an 52 interval in this case, a weighted average value of Pa before and after the discontinuity may be used. In practice, a precise evaluation of Pa is not required in general as the time interval used in calculation is so short that it is sufciently accurate to consider the discontinuity as either in case (1) or (2). Alternatively, a variable time step approach can be used to adjust the the time interval at which the discontinuity occurs such that the discontinuity locates exactly

KWCn v2.2

&

% 26

## 5.6 Factors Affecting Transient Stability

From the swing equation, the acceleration of the rotor is inversely proportional to the inertia constant M of the machine when accelerating power is constant.
This means higher the inertia constant, the slower will be the change in the rotor angle of the machine and thus large the critical clearing time. However, it is uneconomical to improve the transient stability by increasing the inertia constant 53 and is normally not used.

The methods normally used for improving the transient stability are:
1. Higher system voltage an increase in system voltage results in higher value of the steady-state stability limit (Pmax ). The higher the Pmax value, the smaller will be the transmission angle reqired to transfer a given amount of power. This means the greater is the margin between the steady-state transmission angle and the critical clearing angle.

& '

## 2. Use of parallel lines and/or series capacitors to reduce the transmission

reactance again reducing the series reactance by using parallel lines and/or series capacitors can achieve the same objective of improving the

% \$

Pmax .
3. Use of high speed circuit breakers and auto-reclosing breakers the quicker a breaker can operate, the faster the fault will be removed from the system and the smaller will be the change in rotor position. Hence, the better the 54 tendency of the system to restore to normal operating conditions. 5.6.1 Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR)

A voltage regulator is the heart of the excitation system. The output voltage of
the generator changes only when the voltage regulator instructs the excitation system to do so irrespective of the speed of response of the exciter.

A regulator senses changes in the output voltage and/or current and causes
corrective action to take place. If the regulator is slow, the system will be a poor

KWCn v2.2

&

one.

% 27

## Transient Stability Analysis

The settings and physical limits on the AVR will have a direct impact on the
system performance. With a good setting, both the steady-state and transient stability limits can be improved with the use of AVR.

55

& '

% \$

## Though speed governing control has little effects in terms of steady-steady

stability, fast acting governor can certainly improve multi-swing transient stabilty.

In the short period ( 1s) after the disturbance, the governor and turbine will be
too slow to have any signicant effect on the generator rotor response.

However, the governing effects will kick in and improve the system response as
56 excess mechanical power coming the steam turbine has been reduced by the closing the main steam controlling and interceptor valves.

KWCn v2.2

&

% 28

## EE4031 Power Systems

Tutorial on Transient Stability
1. A three-phase fault is applied at P as shown in Fig.1 with reactances given on a common system base. The generator is delivering 1.0 pu power at the instant preceding the fault. a) By calculation, find the critical clearing angle for clearing the fault with simultaneous opening of the breakers 1 and 2. b) Plot the power-angle curves and show the equality of the accelerating and decelerating areas. c) Suggest a method to improve the transient stability of this system and explain briefly how the method works.

Fig.1 2. A 50Hz generator with a reactance of 0.3 pu has an inertia constant H = 5. It delivers power of 0.8 pu to an infinite bus through a transmission network with transfer reactance of 0.2 pu. The internal voltage of the generator and the voltage of the infinite bus are maintained at 1.05 pu and 1 pu, respectively. a) Determine the load angle of the generator. b) Determine the steady-state stability limit. c) Determine the synchronizing power coefficient. d) Due to a fault on the transmission network, the transfer reactance is suddenly doubled. Plot the swing curve of the generator for the first 0.2 s after the fault using a time step of 0.05 s. 3. A generator operating at 50 Hz with an inertia constant H of 5 sec delivers half-load (i.e. Po = 0.5 pu) to an infinite bus of voltage 1.0 pu through a transmission link with total reactance XL of 0.4 pu. The internal voltage E and reactance XG of the generator is 1.5 pu and 0.8 pu, respectively. a) Find the power angle o and the steady-state stability limit Pmax. b) A three-phase fault occurs at the generator terminal, find the critical clearing angle cr and the corresponding critical clearing time tcr.

## EE4031, KWCn, 23 Apr 2010

4.

A generator with 0.2 pu reactance is connected to a busbar via a transformer having a reactance of 0.15 pu. The busbar is then connected to a large power system by a doublecircuit line, each circuit of which has a reactance of 1.2 pu. The voltages at both the generator terminal and the large power system is 1.0 pu. The generator has an inertia constant of 5 sec and delivers 0.9 pu real power to the large power system.
_

a) Find the internal voltage and the power angle of the generator. b) Due to malfunction of a relay, one of the circuits in the double circuit line was tripped suddenly and then reclosed after 0.2 sec. Calculate the power angle of the generator when the tripped circuit was reclosed, hence plot its value for the next 0.1 sec using time steps of 0.05 sec. 5. Fig.5 shows a synchronous generator connected to an infinite bus via a double circuit line with reactances and voltages given on a common system base. A transient threephase fault occurs at the mid-point of one of the lines. At the instant preceding the fault, the generator is delivering a steady-state power Pg = 1.0 pu. a) Determine the pre-fault steady-state rotor angle o of the generator. b) The fault is first isolated by switching out the faulty line when the rotor angle increases to 1 = 90o, and is subsequently cleared by the time when the line is reclosed at rotor angle 2 = 120o. Apply the equal area criterion, and determine the transient stability of the post-fault system.

Fig.5 6. A 50Hz generator with a reactance of 0.25 pu delivers a steady-state power of 0.8 pu over a transmission system to an infinite busbar. The steady-state voltages at both the generator terminal and the infinite bus are 1.0 pu. The generator has an inertia constant H of 5 sec, and the effective transfer reactance of the transmission system is 0.4 pu. a) Find the internal voltage and the power angle of the generator. b) A solid three phase fault occurs in the transmission system and is subsequently cleared after 0.15 sec. The effective transfer reactances of the transmission system during and after the fault are 1.0 and 0.6 pu, respectively. Plot the power angle of the generator for the first 0.1 sec after the fault using time steps of 0.05 sec, and hence determine the power angle and power output of the generator after the fault has been cleared for 0.1 sec.

## EE4031 Power Systems

Tutorial on Transient Stability
1. a) The total transmission reactance:

X pre = 0.2 + 0.4 // 0.4 + 0.05 = 0.45 pu The maximum power output:
EV 1.2 8 = = pu X pre 0.45 3 and their ratio P 24 /13 9 r2 = max 2 = = Pmax 8/3 13 The initial rotor angle Pmax =

## X post = 0.2 + 0.4 + 0.05 = 0.65 pu

EV 1.2 24 = = pu X post 0.65 13

Pmax 2 =

cr = cos1

## ( m o ) sin o + r2 cos m o = 1.2209 rad = 69.95 r 2

b) power-angle curves

c) Install a braking resistor close to the generator terminals, the amount of energy available to accelerate the rotor can then be significantly reduced, and hence the system stability can be improved.
EE4031, KWCn, 23 Apr 2010 3

2. a)

Pmax =

## EV 1.05 = = 2.1 pu X pre 0.5

Po 0.8 = sin -1 = 22.39 o Pmax 2.1

c)

## Ps = Pmax cos o = 2.1cos 22.39o = 1.94 pu/rad

H 5 1 = = s 2 /deg 180 f 180 50 1800

M=

d)

## X post = 0.3 + 0.4 = 0.7 pu

t (s)
00+ 0avg 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20

Pmax =
2.1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5

EV X

Pe = Pmax sin
0.8 0.5714 0.5837 0.6192 0.6733 0.7393

Pa = 0.8 Pe
0 0.2286 0.1143 0.2163 0.1808 0.1267 0.0607

t 2 Pa M
0.51 0.97 0.81 0.57 0.27

0.51 1.48 2.29 2.86 3.13

(deg)
22.90 24.38 26.67 29.53 32.66

where ( n ) = ( n 1) +
34 32 Rotor (deg) 30 28 26 24 22 0

t 2 Pa M (n)

and

( n ) = ( n1) + ( n )

0.05

0.15

0.2

## EE4031, KWCn, 23 Apr 2010

3. a) The total transmission reactance: X = 0.8 + 0.4 = 1.2 pu The maximum power output: Pmax = EV 1.5 1.0 = = 1.25 pu X 1.2

Steady-state output: Po = Pmax sin o = 0.5 pu b) Fault-on: Pmax1 = 0 Post-fault: Pmax 2 = Pmax The maximum rotor angle: m = o = 2.7301 rad The critical clearing angle:
( m o ) sin o + r2 cos m = 1.5599 rad = 89.375o r2

o = sin 1

r1 =

## Pmax1 Pmax Pmax 2 Pmax

=0

r2 =

=1

cr = cos1

Considering the corresponding critical clearing time: f Po 2 50 0.5 2 cr = tcr + o = tcr + 0.4115 = 1.5599 rad 2H 25 tcr = 0.3824 sec 4. a) Let t be the terminal voltage angle relative the infinite bus. 11 t = 42.454 sin t = 0.9 0.15 + 1.2 / 2 V V 142.454 10 Terminal current I = t b = = 0.9 + j 0.35 pu j 0.75 j 0.75 Generator internal voltage: E = Vb + IX = 1 + (0.9 + j 0.35)( j 0.95) = 0.668 + j 0.855 = 1.08552 b) M = H 5 1 2 = = s / deg 180 f 180 50 1800 X pre = 0.2 + 0.15 + 1.2 = 0.95 pu 2

X post = X pre

## t 0 0+ 0avg 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.2 0.2+ 0.2avg 0.25 0.3

Pe (pu) 0.9 0.5516 0.5575 0.5742 0.5994 0.6294 1.0269 1.0699 1.0990

## 0.05 0.05 0.05

Pa (pu) 0 0.3484 0.1742 0.3425 0.3258 0.3006 0.2706 -0.1269 0.0718 -0.1699 -0.1990

(o/s2)

(o/s)

(o/s)

(o)

(o)

## 69.51 74.22 78.02

where Pe( n ) =

EV sin ( n ) , (n) X

## Pa( n ) = Pm Pe( n ) = 0.9

EV sin ( n ) , (n) X

( n +1) =

Pa( n ) M

( n +1) ( n +1) = a t ,

## ( n +1) = ( n ) + ( n +1) ( n +1) = ( n ) + ( n +1)

( n +1) = ( n +1) t ,

5. a) Pre-fault transmission reactance X 0 = j 0.9 + j 0.4 // ( j 0.2 + j 0.2) = j1.1 Pre-fault power output P0 =

0 = 37.67

P 1 =

## 0.9 0.4 + 0.4 0.2 + 0.2 0.9 = j 3.1 0.2

Fault-off transmission reactance X 2 = j 0.9 + j 0.4 = j1.3 EV 1.8 1 P2 = a b sin = sin = 1.3846sin X2 1.3 Post-fault transmission reactance = pre-fault transmission reactance = j1.1 EV 1.8 1 P3 = a b sin = sin = 1.6364sin X0 1.1 Total accelerating area Aa = ( P0 P 1 )d =
0 1
90 37.67

(1 0.5806sin ) d

= 0.454

## Total decelerating area

Ad = ( P2 P0 )d + ( P3 P0 )d
1 2 2 3
120 18037.67

90

(1.3846sin 1) d + 120

(1.6364sin 1) d

= 0.256

Based on the equal area criterion, the system is transient unstable as the allowable decelerating area is less the acceleration are, i.e. Aa > Ad
EE4031, KWCn, 23 Apr 2010 6

6. a) Let t be the terminal voltage angle relative the infinite bus. 11 t = 18.663 sin t = 0.8 0.4 V Vb 118.663 10 Terminal current I = t = = 0.8 + j 0.131 pu j 0.4 j 0.4 Generator internal voltage: E = Vb + X = 1 + (0.8 + j 0.131)( j 0.25 + j 0.4) = 0.915 + j 0.52 = 1.05229.62 b) M = H 5 1 2 = = s / deg 180 f 180 50 1800 X pre = 0.25 + 0.4 = 0.65 pu X post = 0.25 + 0.6 = 0.85 pu
(o/s2) (o/s) (o/s) (o) (o ) 29.62 30.49 33.03 37.11

## X fault = 0.25 + 1.0 = 1.25 pu

t 0 0+ 0avg 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.15+ 0.15avg 0.2 t Pe (pu) 0.8 0.416 Pa (pu) 0 0.384 0.192 0.373 0.3413 0.2922 0.0533 0.1728 -0.0276

0.05 0.05 0.427 0.05 0.4587 0.5078 0.7467 0.05 0.05 0.8276

## 0.86 2.54 4.08

310.99 -49.62

15.55 -2.48

97.11 94.63

4.86 4.73

41.96 46.70

where

(n) e

EV = ( n ) sin ( n ) , X

(n) a

= Pm P

(n) e

EV = 0.8 ( n ) sin ( n ) , X

(n)

Pa( n ) = M

(n) ( n +1) = a t ,

( n +1) = ( n ) + ( n +1)
( n +1) = ( n ) + ( n +1)

( n +1) = ( n +1) t ,

After fault cleared for 0.1 sec (i.e. t = 0.25 sec): Power angle = 46.7o Power output = 0.9 pu