You are on page 1of 2

Unified Quantum Field Theory

A Tract Book Essay


Anthony J. Fejfar, B.A., J.D., Esq., Coif

© Copyright 2007 by Anthony J. Fejfar

The “modern” view of reality which prevailed in the West for quite some time was

that we lived in a materialistic world and universe where the building block of reality is

and was the Atom. Because of this we developed to some extent what can be described

as an Atomistic World View. This idea was that the ultimate nature of reality was

characterized by inanimate, material, atoms.

After awhile, though, some scientists and philosophers started wondering if in fact

the Atom itself was composed of even smaller particles which they called subatomic

particles. Soon, scientific experiments started “proving” the existence of such subatomic

particles as the electron, the positron, the photon, the quark, and finally, the Quanta.

About the time that subatomic particles started being talked about, Einstein

developed Relativity Theory and other scientists developed Quantum Theory.

Interestingly, these scientists could not account for a Unitary nature of Reality anymore.

Thus, the search began for Unified Quantum Field Theory. It was thought that if Unified

Quantum Field Theory was found, this would once again argue that there is a unitary

nature to reality itself, not just a probabilistic nature manifesting multidimensionally.

While the search for Unified Quantum Field Theory was still well under way,

some scientists decided to take another approach. This new approach to reality was

called String Theory. String Theory argued that the ultimate nature of reality is
composed of “strings” which mask themselves as subatomic particles. Thus, the

ultimate nature of reality is the chameleon string. The problem was, however, how to

reconcile string theory with Quantum Theory? Well, the answer which I came up with,

even prior to reading about string theory, is this: The ultimate building block of the

universe is the Quanta subatomic particle. Thus, there is a Unitary Quantum Field, of

sorts, and Unitary Quantum Field Theory exists as science.

I argue that the Quanta subatomic particle, like string theory, is a chameleon

particle. The Quanta masks itself as other subatomic particles by reason of meaning

and/or natural law. While the Quanta can certainly display itself as a Quanta, it can also

display as an electron, a positron, a quark, etc.

Now, how is all of this reconciled with the old Atomistic theory? Most scientists

would argue, I suspect, that Atomism was merely a mistaken theory. I, on the other hand,

have a more subtle argument to be made. I argue that the transpersonal meaning reality

of Western culture was so strong that the Quanta particles all masked themselves as

Atoms, without any subatomic particles at all. This also accounts for the idea that

medieval and ancient classical physics or metaphysics was, as still could be valid.

Perhaps in the ancient world where everyone believed in Form, Cause, and Accident,

there really were no atoms. The Quantum Field and individual Quanta Particles simply

played the parts necessary for ancient and medieval metaphysics to work. Food for