1. The issues here actually have nothing to do with driving without a license or presenting a birth certificate in order to be issued such a license. The issue here is, "What, exactly, is it that transpires in the application and issuance of a driver license? Or, put in the context of this notice, how does a man or woman born free and sovereign over their own individual entity, become a "person" obligated to apply to an agency of a totally artificial entity in order to be issued a driver license? Or, is there actually any actual obligation for a man or woman born free and sovereign over their own individual entity, to apply to an agency of a totally artificial entity in order, to be issued a driver license? What is the true and actual purpose behind the surreptitious procedure preceding the issuance of a driver license? Is the issuance of a driver license the true and actual reason for the presentation of the "applicant’s" birth certificate? Or is there another more devious purpose for such a specious requirement? 2. The issues here are much more fundamentally important, having to do with honesty, integrity and an acknowledgment by those "persons" administering the government, that the purpose for the creation of government in the first place was not to create a monster to micro manage the lives of the common people, but, rather, to provide an orderly way for societal interactive needs to be provided for, such as water supply, sewage disposal, and the warding off of foreign tyrants, and was not for the purpose of establishing a home grown tyranny with the authority to require everyone to get permission from the government in order to use an additional square or two of toilet paper. 3. Article one section six of the California Constitution, and the thirteenth amendment of the United States Constitution clearly and unambiguously prohibits involuntary servitude. 4. If the prohibition of involuntary servitude does not include a prohibition of mandatory driver licensing then what else is there that the government of California may require the people of California to do against their will? A better question is, "What, exactly, are the limitations in regard to the government’s ability to micro-manage the lives of everyone in California?" And an even more relevant question is, "Where, under the natural limitations on government examined herein above, wherein it was established that government may not reasonably or properly be imbued with any more authority than the authority imbued by Nature into any one single individual man, where, then, does the government get the authority to require any "person" to be issued a driver license prior to operating a motor vehicle on the highways of California?" Please note that I am not stating that the government does not have such authority, I am asking the question, "Where does this authority properly and reasonably come from?" (Well, the word "reasonably" may be a stretch, but there is no doubt that such authority has been legally acquired, at least as such authority applies to "persons", as the word "person" is defined in §470 of the California Vehicle code. 5. I will answer that question herein below in regard to any purported requirement for every man and woman to procure a "driver license" prior to operating their own individually owned self propelled transportation unit. I further contend that in my answer to the above question I will establish that the
having been appropriately subjected to mind controlling indoctrination. The issue as to who is required to conform under the California Codes is based on whether the individual is a "person" as the word "person" is defined in §470 of the California Vehicle Code. born free and politically independent. (4) how the individual. the issue of this is limited to examining and determining whether or not I am a "person" as the word "person" is defined in §470 Of the California Vehicle Code. or being prompted to question the validity of the freedom negating information the "someone else" is indoctrinating the individual with. I will demonstrate a sequence of events starting with (1) the creation and recording of an event. (7) presents "his" birth certificate in order to (8) be issued the much coveted California driver license. as I have reiterated several times herein. and proudly. the issue we are examining is much more fundamental than the matter of a driver license. every individual present in California does. so that the Codes of California. then. (5) "voluntarily" presents himself to a local Department of Revenue Office. may be readily decoded by the astute reader. Again. the "someone else" being an indoctrination officer whose intention (knowingly or unknowingly) is to program the individual child to accept a condition of virtually total servitude. so that the definitions included therein are in full compliance with Article one section six of the California Constitution’s prohibition of Involuntary Servitude.Legislature of California agrees with me on the issue of driver license requirements. paying attention to the grammatical manner in which the statutes are written.) 7. It is like playing the computer card game. As afore stated. mine being that I have not volunteered myself to submit to the dominion of California by becoming a "person" as the word "person" is defined in §470 Of the California Vehicle Code. are. where (6) the individual "voluntarily" and eagerly. and. How do I arrive at my understanding of the intention of the Legislature? By actually reading the words they used and adhering to them. of course. the birth of a person(a)'s birth on a birth certificate. that when born every human baby is devoid of even the most minuscule amount of ability to evaluate whether the information presented to it is good for it or good for "someone else". 8. have a political relationship with California. I would then be required to apply for a driver license under the codes of California prior to operating a motor vehicle on the highways of California. to "volunteer" to claim to be such "person". written as they are. 6. 9. This takes more than a cursory examination because there is more to it than may be found in just one subsection of the California Vehicle Code. What I will demonstrate is that all men and women born on the land area claimed by California to be under its dominion. Therefore. (2) programming instilled in the individual during (3) mandatory attendance in government indoctrination centers euphemistically known as "public schools". without the individual ever being informed of the existence of any optional independent political status. where you often must move single cards in the wrong way in order to be able to later move them in the right way. I am an alien to California. at the time they were born. giving the Legislature full credit for creating the definitions to be grammatically correct as they are set forth in the California Vehicle Code. Freecell. (The birth certificate the individual presents to the Revenue
. a status to which I have not agreed! (As a side comment. and whether or not the individual has been successfully and legally induced or "seduced".
firm. To the casual reader it would seem the intention of the statutory definition of "person" is to legally establish that real live flesh and blood men and women are not any different from corporations like Walmart. (b)" An "owner" is a person having all the incidents of ownership. rents. or "your" airplane. that number (1) is intended to refer to real live flesh and blood men and women. However. but number (1) does not clearly indicate such to be the case. Be that as it may. when entitled to the possession and use of a vehicle under a lease. city. 10. association. or any county. how does the word "natural" modify the word "person" in order to avoid a grammatical error? 14. So then. A "driver" is a person who drives or is in actual physical control of a vehicle. including the legal title of a vehicle whether or not such person lends. the word "natural". when the word "person" is included in the definition of the word "person" such inclusion is either an unacceptable grammatical error or. district. or creates a security interest in the vehicle. (c) "Person" includes a natural person.Office is as much "his" as is "your" bus or "your" taxicab. or rental-purchase agreement for a period of 30 consecutive days or more. if it was the actual intent of the Legislature to legally equate real live flesh and blood men and women with Walmart. coupled with the word "person". in an auxiliary capacity. The term "driver" does not include the tillerman or other person who. that is. a word cannot be used to define itself. if nothing else. 2)firm. 5)limited liability company. There can be no doubt that the legislators who created this statute were well aware of the words "men" and "women" which might seem to have been more appropriately used in the definition of "person". I contend that everything ever written by any legislature is. limited liability company. more likely. the person entitled to the possession of a vehicle as the purchaser under a security agreement. or political subdivision of the State. assists the driver in the steering or operation of any articulated firefighting apparatus. and would have been otherwise undesirable because the term "natural person" is also a reference to an artificial entity. The term “Person” includes six items in the definition of the word person: 1)natural person. 12. Another question here is "What could have been the reason for the Legislature’s inclusion of five clearly artificial entities in the definition of the word "person" if the purpose of the definition of the word "person" was to indicate that such word was intended to refer to or include real live flesh and
. or corporation. was clearly intentional. So. somehow modifies the word "person" so that the inclusion of the word "person" in the definition of itself does not constitute a grammatical error. as I shall explain as I go along. That is. so. or the State. or the United States. lease-sale. always grammatically correct. 4)association. the legislators intentionally avoided the use of the words "men" and "women" because to use those words would have actually created a grammatical error. 6)corporation. Reason will indicate that the legislature’s use instead. To the casual reader it will seem clear that items (2) through (6) are artificial entities and it is will likewise seem clear to the casual reader. The relevant California Vehicle Code provides: (a)" §305. of the term "natural person". "yours"!). 3)copartnership. 13.. copartnership. the more astute reader will recall that we were all taught in grammar school that the definition of a word will never ever include the word being defined in its own definition. that is.
in order to avoid grammatical incorrectness? 15. The first discernment will be to conclude. and (4) the young adult’s burning desire to be issued their peer driven status symbol. Engaging in subterfuge and deceit. (d) all six have. so there is no grammatical error in the inclusion of "natural person" therein. (3)"copartnerships". Our first teachers were. (c) all six are registered with the government. (b) all six have official government approved creating documents. as statutorily defined "persons" equal to Walmart.
. 16. (2)"firms". entice. artificial entities. the first item in the definition of "person". how else do politicians "get things done"? This was not done overnight. as included in the definition of the word "person" in §470 of the California Vehicle Code is intended to be and is also an artificial entity. that the term (1)"natural person". in order for the definition to be grammatically correct. therefore. (e) all six have a name conjured up by their private sector creators and. somehow. (4)"associations. takes more examination and analysis. It is important to understand that when born we humans have no knowledge of any kind. That is. induce or seduce real live flesh and blood men and women to voluntarily submit themselves to the political authority of the artificial entity. induced or seduced into "volunteering" themselves into servitude. it was the public school governmental indoctrination system and this is the beginning of our intentional downhill slide into being a "person" as the word "person" is defined in §470 of the California Vehicle Code. (f) all six are required by the government to have a government issued license. many generations have passed thereby enabling the ploy to be gradually implanted in succeeding generations without hardly anyone ever questioning how it all came about. as I shall explain: 17. 19. copartnership. our own parents. "Person" includes a natural person. the human creators of California can not possibly imbue California with authority to do so either. firm. (3) the Legislature enacting enabling legislation. §470. but the means by which real live flesh and blood men and women are enticed. There is a combination here of (1) the birth certificate and its registration with and abandonment to the government. a driver license. voluntarily obligated themselves to obey and conform to the commands of the California Legislature." (5)" limited liability company " and (6)”corporations”. through their human creating agents. similar in every significant aspect to its definition mates. 20. California. It is important to be cognitively aware that everything that we learned and absorbed as children we learned from someone else or from our innocent observations. last but not least. (2) the indoctrination of the populace through public education when they are children. all six of these artificial entities numbered herein are (a) created by voluntary human intellectual activity. The foregoing explains how the six items in §470 of the California Vehicle Code are all six. at about age five.blood men and women? Clearly such was not the purpose! So. such mates being. most likely. in order for California to be able to command subservience of real live flesh and blood men and women California must. As no individual man or woman has natural authority to command non-volunteers to obey. in order to discern the purpose we must examine the similarities of these five artificial items as they relate to each other and then examine and determine how these similarities apply or relate to the term "natural person". then. So how does California do that? 18.
limited liability company.210 1235. or other legal entity. association. or corporation. CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL CODE (30) "Person" includes an individual or an organization. "Person" includes an individual.C. corporation. or corporation. trust. corporation. SECTION 7343 IN PART: Part O: Title 26 U. partnership. CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1235. association. Part P: United States Code Congressional and Administrative News Part Q: Sections derived from other sections. estate. CALIFORNIA PROBATE CODE 56. CALIFORNIA EVIDENCE CODE 175.1. organization. or public or private organization or entity of any character.C.association. Sec. individual. firm. or public entity. And also in all other California codes that I can find. business. Part Q(17): Section 7343 is derived from: Part O:Title 26 U..110-1235. partnership. trust. club. Sec. business trust. trust.S.S. "Person" means an individual. association. government or governmental subdivision or agency. CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 3479-3484 3482.C.70.S. partnership. or other entity. 7343. corporation. limited liability company. organization. partnership. limited liability company. "Person" includes a natural person. limited liability company. 11405. (See Section 1102. governmental subdivision or unit of a governmental subdivision. "Person" includes any public entity. partnership. corporation.) Section K: TITLE 26 U. proprietorship. (a) As used in this section: (1) "Person" means an individual.160. 7343.
who as such officer. who as such officer. 3 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY INTERNAL REVENUE CODE -1954 SUBTITLE F PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 61BINFORMATION AND RETURNS ~13: § 7343.Section 7343 is derived from: ~1: §7343 is derived from the 1939 Code sections as follows: ~2: 145(d): (d) CROSS REFERENCE . AND PLAYING CARDS. employee. employee. ~6: 2557(b)( : ( The term "person" as used in paragraphs (2) (3) and (4) includes an officer or employee of a corporation or a member or employee of a partnership. employee. who as such officer. CHAPTER 75. or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs. who as such officer. 1718(d). 2707(d). Sec. 894(b)(2)(D). ~5(a): § 1821(a)(4) are under CHAPTER 11BDOCUMENTS. 7343. Definition of term "person" This section continues in one place the provision now found in the various criminal provisions of the existing Internal Revenue Code. who as such officer. Definition of term "person “The term "person" as used in this chapter includes an officer or employee of a corporation.S. ~1: Title 26 U. 3710(c). or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs. or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs.or a member or employee of a partnership. OTHERINSTRUMENTS. or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs. ~4: 1718(d): (d) The term "person" as used in this subsection includes an officer or employee of a corporation or a member or employee of a partnership. ~6(a): § 2557(b)( are under CHAPTER 23B NARCOTICS. 3228.-For penalties for failure to file information returns with respect to foreign personal holding companies and foreign corporation. ~3(a): § 894(b)(2)(D) are under ESTATES TAX. Subchapter D. ~3: 894(b)(2)(D): (D) The term "person" as used in this paragraphs (B) and (C) includes an officer or employee of a corporation or a member or employee of a partnership. or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs. employee. 2557(b)( . or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs. see section 340. employee. Part Q(17):. or a member or employee of a partnership.TITLE 26. ~4(a): § 1718(d) are under ADMISSIONS AND DUES. ~7(a): § 2707(d) are under
. ~5: 1821(a)(4): (4) The term "person" as used in this subsection includes an officer or employee of a corporation or a member or employee of a partnership. 1821(a)(4). 7343: Sec. Part Q: Sections derived from other sections. Part P: United States Code Congressional and Administrative News ~1: 83 rd Congress Second Session 1954 -Vol. who as such officer. Subtitle F. employee. 3793(b)(2).C. (1986) Sections ~2: Derived from Sections the 1939as follows below: Code as follow below: (Derived from) ~1(s): 7343: ~2(s): 145(d). ~7: 2707(d): (d) The term "person" as used in this section includes an officer or employee of a corporation.
(a) PERSON . so the "owner" of the name. thereupon the young adult has unknowingly and unwittingly relinquished the individual political sovereignty and independence he or she was born with and volunteered his or her self into a condition of voluntary servitude with the political status of a "person" as the word "person" is defined in §470 of the California Vehicle Code. company. or corporation. At the age of sixteen years the child.CHAPTER 25BFIREARMS. 25. the young adult presents his or her self to the said Revenue Office where the young adult proudly presents "his" or "her" birth certificate. Among honest people. this is known as "fraudulent inducement". 3228. The term "person" as used in this section includes an officer or employee of a corporation or a member or employee of a partnership. by such "birth". the birth certificate created by the child’s parents upon the "birth” of the child constituted the creation of an artificial persona. for which the child has been indoctrinated to believe and accept without question that he or she was automatically born into. also born into being a citizen of California. 22. During the first sixteen years of his or her life. these young adults have been programmed to believe that he or she must present "his" or "her" birth certificate to the local Department of Revenue Office in order to be issued a California driver license. It is important here to understand that it is the "name" that the state becomes the owner of. association. after some testing and skill examination. as well as a natural person. the young adult is issued an California driver license. At the age of five or six years the child is enrolled in government indoctrination centers euphemistically known as "public schools" where the child is indoctrinated for the next thirteen years to believe he or she was born into United States citizenship and is likewise indoctrinated to believe that through such "birth" he or she was automatically. who as such officer. Thereupon. employee.. 24. ~8(a): § 3228 are under Part V Narcotics. ~9: 3710(c):(c) PERSON DEFINED . becomes the state of California. 23. the initial setup for "personhood" is when a newborn baby’s parents conjure up a name for their child and then enter that name on a birth certificate and the county recorder records the name and the other information entered on the birth certificate with the appropriate government recording office. not the child. That is.
. By failing to reserve any ownership rights to the name the parents effectively inform the county recorder the name and then. 21. by default. Please take Mandatory Judicial Notice that it is physically impossible for a real live flesh and blood human baby to be born in an artificial entity or to be born automatically into citizenship of such an artificial entity. The word "person" as used in this part and subchapter A or chapter 23 shall be construed to mean and include a partnership. or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs. at that time having attained the age where he or she is recognized to be a somewhat responsible adult. is old enough to volunteer him or her self into a condition of servitude known as "citizenship". abandon it. 26. Although not realized by parents. and especially after entering "High School". DEFINITIONS. such persona being the "name" entered on the birth certificate. ~8: 3228: SEC. whereupon. When informing the county recorder with the information filled out on the birth certificate document the parents do not reserve any ownership rights to the name they conjured up for their child.
a "person" as the word "person" is defined in §470 of the California Vehicle Code. At the time the definition of the word "person" was "discovered" the attention was cunningly focused on the Legislatures defining of firms. As involuntary servitude is prohibited by both the Thirteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution and Article one section six of the California Constitution. By cleverly defining the common word "person" to include several artificial entities and include among them the term "natural person" the legislators would be able to befuddle all but the most astute linguists. without the scheme devised being an overt violation of the Constitutional prohibitions of involuntary servitude. the Legislators had to devise a clever scheme whereby it could be legally claimed that all real live flesh and blood men and women were subject to the statutes of California. under the artificial guise of an artificial entity. 29. When the child’s parents inform the county recorder. which protections are in many ways very reasonable as corporate owners of property had legal interests to protect and legal obligation to be met. associations. designated as a "natural person". How can a "person" be construed to be an artificial entity? Only by a skillfully contrived statutory enactment: 31. such property being the "name" entered on the "applicant’s" birth certificate. Additionally. the applicant unknowingly and unwittingly agreed to function as a "person" under the persona. The application for the driver license would be more properly described as an application for a license to enable the applicant to legally use government owned property. the presentation of the birth certificate had considerable to do with establishing that the applicant was thereupon and thereafter. 28. When the child was born. The fact that the term "natural person" included in the definition of "person" would be surreptitiously used to cause real live flesh and blood men and women to "voluntarily" submit themselves to the political authority of an artificial entity through their "voluntary" application to use the artificial persona "name" created by the filing of "their" birth
.27. all to be persons with many of the Constitutionally protected rights of "natural persons". the actual transaction had very little to do with the licensing of the applicants operation of a self propelled conveyance on the public way of California. and then the county recorder records that document with the government recording office the parents failed to reserve any ownership rights or interest in the said persona created and recorded therein. an artificial entity. copartnerships. 32. as the term "natural person" is included among five other artificial persons in the definition of the word "person" in §470 of the California Vehicle Code. Through the application for and issuance of the driver license. the scheme they devised would need to make it possible for it to be legally claimed that real live flesh and blood men and women were subject to the jurisdiction of California. limited liability companies and corporations. 30. an event was recorded on the birth certificate the child then presented the birth certificate as a driver license applicant. Such failure on the part of the parents constitutes the abandonment of any ownership interest the parents may have had in the persona they created and such abandonment causes the ownership interest to devolve upon the State of California.
certificate at the time of "their" birth. "Resident" means any person who manifests an intent to live or be located in this state on more than a temporary or transient basis. except those who intentionally implemented the scheme. (b) Location of employment or place of business. 34. WORDS AND PHRASES DEFINED §305. [Chapter 3. occurrences. (f) Renting or leasing a home for use as a residence. A "driver" is a person who drives or is in actual physicalcontrol of a vehicle. was totally missed by everyone. (e) Filing a homeowner's property tax exemption. these definitions shall govern the construction of this code. as amended to the close of the Legislative Session of 2005] The people of the State of California do enact as follows: DIVISION 1. (d) Attendance of dependents at a primary or secondary school.
. (g) Declaration of residency to obtain a license or any other privilege or benefit not ordinarily extended to a nonresident. Statutes of 1959. In examining the California Vehicle code. The following are evidence of residency for purposes of vehicle registration: (a) Address where registered to vote. (h) Possession of a California driver's license. In examining The California Vehicle Code we find additional definitions of terms having to do with drivers: California Vehicle Code 100. §435. The term "driver" does not include the tillerman or other person who. Presence in the state for six months or more in any 12-month period gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of residency. An act to repeal and re-enact the Vehicle code. (c) Payment of resident tuition at a public institution of higher education. or events that indicate presence in the state is more than temporary or transient. assists the driver in the steering or operation of any articulated firefighting apparatus. "Nonresident" is a person who is not a resident of this State. during their application for a driver license. in an auxiliary capacity. Unless the provision or context otherwise requires. 33. §516. (i) Other acts.
(a) A person may not drive a motor vehicle upon a highway. as specified in subdivision (h) of Section 12804. the person entitled to the possession of a vehicle as the purchaser under a security agreement. Exemptions. limited liability company. except those persons who are expressly exempted under this code. As used in this subdivision. motor-driven cycle. or corporation. or any county. or motorized bicycle upon a highway. A "driver" is a person who drives or is in actual physical control of a vehicle. or creates a security interest in the vehicle. city. Unlawful to drive unless licensed §12500. Chapter 1.§305. assists the driver in the steering or operation of any articulated firefighting apparatus. or the State. "Person" includes a natural person. Article 1. lease-sale. except when the motor vehicle being operated is a commercial motor vehicle. Person’s exempt §12501. and age limits. including the legal title of a vehicle whether or not such person lends. or the United States. or those persons specifically authorized to operate motorized bicycles or motorized scooters with a valid driver's license of any class. (b) Any person while driving or operating implements of husbandry incidentally operated or moved over a highway.9. (d) A person may not drive a motor vehicle or combination of vehicles that is not of a type for which the person is licensed. rents. district. (c) A person may not drive a motor vehicle in or upon any off street parking facility. and privately owned facilities for off street parking where no fee is charged for the privilege to park and which are held open for the common public use of retail customers. or political subdivision of the State. The term "driver" does not include the tillerman or other person who. except those persons who are expressly exempted under this code. when entitled to the possession and use of a vehicle under a lease. Persons required to be licensed. association. copartnership. DRIVERS’ LICENSES. The following persons are not required to obtain a driver's license: (a) An officer or employee of the United States. (c) Any
. §460. in an auxiliary capacity. unless the person then holds a valid driver's license of the appropriate class or certification to operate the vehicle. as defined in Section 15210. unless the person then holds a valid driver's license or endorsement issued under this code for that class. except as provided in Section 36300 or 36305. §470. California Vehicle Code. "off street parking facility" means any off street facility held open for use by the public for parking vehicles and includes any publicly owned facilities for off street parking. firm. unless the person then holds a valid driver's license issued under this code. (e) A motorized scooter operated on public streets shall at all times be equipped with an engine that complies with the applicable State Air Resources Board emission requirements. An "owner" is a person having all the incidents of ownership. Division 6. or rental-purchase agreement for a period of 30 consecutive days or more. (b) A person may not drive a motorcycle. while operating a motor vehicle owned or controlled by the United States on the business of the United States.
§12504. (b) Any nonresident over the age of 16 years but under the age of 18 years who is a resident of a foreign jurisdiction which requires the licensing of drivers may continue to operate a motor vehicle in this state after 10 days from his or her date of entry into this state if he or she meets both the following: (1) He or she has a valid driver's license. A nonresident over the age of 18 years whose home state or country does not require the licensing of drivers may operate a foreign vehicle owned by him for not to exceed 30 days without obtaining a license under this code. §12502. (a) The following persons may operate a motor vehicle in this state without obtaining a driver's license under this code: (1) A nonresident over the age of 18 years having in his or her immediate possession a valid driver's license issued by a foreign jurisdiction of which he or she is a resident. a commercial vehicle. Nothing in this subdivision authorizes operation of a motor vehicle by a person without a valid driver's license upon any off street parking facility. shall have in his or her possession a current medical certificate of a type described in subdivision (c) of Section 12804. as defined in Section 353. 21 years of age or older.9. in a commercial vehicle. both of which shall be in his or her immediate possession. a valid license with the appropriate endorsement issued by another state or other jurisdiction that is recognized by the department. except as provided in Section 12505. issued by the Diplomatic Motor Vehicle Office of the Office of Foreign Missions of the United States Department of State. within this state. for the type of motor vehicle or combination of vehicles that the person is operating. which the department issues to a nonresident minor who holds a valid driver's license issued to him or her by his or her home state or country. in his or her immediate possession. (2) A nonresident. The maximum period during which that nonresident may operate a motor vehicle in this state without obtaining a driver's license is limited to a period of 10 days immediately following the entry of the nonresident into this state except as provided in subdivision (b) of this section. or a Canadian driver's license and a copy of his or her current training certificate to transport hazardous material that complies with all federal laws and regulations with respect to hazardous materials. if transporting hazardous material. (c) A nonresident possessing a medical certificate in accordance with subdivision (b) shall comply with any restriction of the medical certificate issued to that nonresident. having in his or her immediate possession. as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 12500. the department
.person driving or operating an off-highway motor vehicle subject to identification. as defined in Section 38012. and who files proof of financial responsibility. which has been issued within two years of the date of operation of that vehicle. (2) He or she has been issued and has in his or her immediate possession a nonresident minor's certificate. (c) Whenever any of the conditions for the issuance of a nonresident minor's certificate cease to exist. §12503. while operating. issued by the foreign jurisdiction. (3) A nonresident having in his or her immediate possession a valid driver's license. as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 15210. (b) Any person entitled to the exemption contained in subdivision (a). (a) Sections 12502 and 12503 apply to any nonresident over the age of 16 years but under the age of 18 years. while driving or operating such motor vehicle as provided in Section 38025.
residency shall be determined as a person's state of domicile. §12505. (b) The presumption of residency in this state may be rebutted by satisfactory evidence that the licensee's primary residence is in another state. or Canada. or possession of the United States. (f) Any person from a foreign country. or upgraded commercial driver's license pursuant to Section 384. or events that indicate presence in the state is more than temporary or transient. the following: (A) Address where registered to vote. having a valid driver's license issued to him or her by any other foreign jurisdiction having licensing standards deemed by the Department of Motor Vehicles equivalent to those of this state. and permanent home and principal residence and to which he or she has manifested the intention of returning whenever he or she is absent. the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. a nonresident commercial driver's license is a commercial driver's license issued by a state to an individual domiciled in a foreign country or in another state. or 12504 may operate a motor vehicle in this state for not to exceed 10 days from the date he or she establishes residence in this state. the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. the District of Columbia. G. fixed. (D) Other acts. (B) Payment of resident tuition at a public institution of higher education. may operate a motor vehicle in this state without obtaining a license from the department. (C) Filing a homeowner's property tax exemption. (3) For the purposes of this subdivision. territory. (2) A person who is a resident of this state may obtain a nonresident commercial driver's license from any state that elects to issue a nonresident commercial driver's license and that complies with the testing and licensing standards contained in subparts F. or Canada. except that he or she shall obtain a license from the department upon becoming a resident before being employed for compensation by another for the purpose of driving a motor vehicle on the highways. "State of domicile" means the state where a person has his or her true. (e) Subject to Section 12504. except a territory or possession of the United States.shall cancel the certificate and require the minor to surrender it to the department. renewal. shall obtain a class A or a class B license from the department before operating
. the following applies: (1) An existing commercial driver's license issued pursuant to this code prior to the date that the state is notified of its decertification shall remain valid until its expiration date. except that he or she shall obtain a license before being employed for compensation by another for the purpose of driving a motor vehicle on the highways. a person over the age of 16 years who is a resident of a foreign jurisdiction other than a state. Prima facie evidence of residency for driver's licensing purposes includes. (c) Any person entitled to an exemption under Section 12502. occurrences. but is not limited to. (2) California residency is required of a person in order to be issued a commercial driver's license under this code. and H of Part 383 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. (a) (1) For purposes of this division only and notwithstanding Section 516.405 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. (d) If the State of California is decertified by the federal government and prohibited from issuing an initial. 12503.
None of these many definitions include the words "men" or "women". §12508. the District of Columbia. if the licensee has the temporary license in his or her immediate possession. and there are innumerable definitions of the word "person" throughout the Codes of California. Throughout the Codes of California we find a universal use of the word "person". etc. in individual cases. notwithstanding that the applicant has failed the written examination on the person's first attempt.9. This repetitious emphatic use of the word "person" is clearly intended to be interpreted by the casual reader as a reference to real live flesh and blood men and women without overtly including the words "men" and "women" in any way that would cause a grammatical error to exist in the definition of the word "person". Notwithstanding subdivision (b) of Section 12805.” limited liability company”"corporation". a license limited in duration to less than the regular term. In every one of these many definitions the very first item included in every definition of the word "person" is the term "natural person". Upon the expiration of a limited term license the department may extend its duration for an additional period without fee but the duration of the license and extensions shall not exceed the term of a regular license. This subdivision does not apply to (1) drivers of school buses operated in California on a trip for educational purposes or (2) drivers of vehicles used to provide the services of a local public agency. the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. or the Dominion of Canada. 35. several items all clearly being some manner of artificial entity. the department may issue a temporary driver's license to an applicant who has previously been licensed in this state or in any other state. 2005. In not one single instance could I find a definition of the word "person" in the Codes of California which included the words "men" or "women". to any person applying for renewal of a driver's license. The medical examination form required for issuance of a class A or class B driver's license shall be completed by a health care professional. (g) This section does not authorize the employment of a person in violation of Section 12515. or registered to perform physical examinations in the United States of America. as described in Section 12804.
. "copartnership". territory. such as "firm".on the highways a motor vehicle for which a class A or class B license is required. In every instance every definition of the word "person" includes several categories of various artificial entities. as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 12804. (h) This section shall become operative on September 20. without exception. or possession of the United States. §12506. A temporary license permits the operation of a motor vehicle upon the highways for a period of 60 days.9. "association". The temporary license is invalid when the applicant's license has been issued or refused. or to any licensee whose license is required to be changed. to any applicant for a driver's license. certified. In every instance the additional items included in such definitions are. When in the opinion of the department it would be in the interest of safety. The department may issue a temporary driver's license to any person applying for a driver's license. added to. even in the subsections setting forth who shall be exempted from driver licensing there is no mention of any driver who would not be a "person" as the word "person" is defined in §470 of the California Vehicle Code. and while the department is completing its investigation and determination of all facts relative to the applicant's right to receive a license. who is licensed. or modified. the department may issue.
Ed. The reason the Legislature could not and did not use the words "man" or "woman" in any of its many definitions of the word "person" in the Codes of California is because "man" and "woman" are not words that in any way lend themselves well in references to such artificial persons as "firms". exercise.. in an auxiliary capacity. if done by permission or for a lawful purpose? * * * We cannot suppose such to have been
. "copartnership". assists the driver in the steering or operation of any articulated firefighting apparatus. A "driver" is a person who drives or is in actual physical control of a vehicle.. punished or endangered. In the definition of "driver" in The California Vehicle Code we find: “§305. control over or steer. to be a real live flesh and blood man or woman. as was ruled by the U.S. 511. is to include only one specific "person" among the five artificial persons included in the definition of the word "person" in §305 and that "artificial person" is the "person" who presented a birth certificate in order to be issued a driver license and thereby "volunteer" to be included in the class designated as a "natural person" in §305.. The term "driver" does not include the tillerman or other person who.. that the "driver" mentioned therein. 1892 "In Pier Co. Clark. by implication. " "In the case of State v. It is clear that this section’s intention is to convey. C.' as distinguished from 'accidental' or 'involuntary. 96. all of which were referenced by SCOTUS in HOLY TRINITY CHURCH v. It is additionally quite clear that this definition of "driver" is intended to very clearly exclude "firm". The clear intention here. 266. The previous careful analysis of the definitions of "person" and "driver" as such are incorporated in the California Code enables us to construct the intent of the legislature by use of reasonable interpretation and thereby avoid totally absurd applications of such statutes. "copartnerships". in an auxiliary capacity. Feb. The term "driver" does not include the tillerman or other person who. "associations". 99. 36 L. "a person” except in this instance.36. ABBOTT. quotes from Lord Coke as follows: 'Acts of parliament are to be so construed as no man that is innocent or free from [causing] injury or wrong [doing] be. v.. by a literal construction [of the statute]. even though §305’s primary candidate to be designated as A "driver" is a person who drives or is in actual physical control of a vehicle yes.Ct. or "corporations" “limited liability company” OR "NATURAL PERSONS". the term "a person" is not intended to include every artificial person included in the definition of the word "person". J. "associations".S. in the definition of the word "driver". “limited liability company” and "corporation" from the definition of "driver".” 37. he does willfully. [I]n what sense is the term 'willful' used? In common parlance. Law. 143 U. U. is a person who drives or is in actual physical control of a vehicle. Is it used in that sense in this act? Did the legislature intend to make the intentional opening of a fence for the purpose of going upon the land of another indictable.. assists the driver in the steering or operation of any articulated firefighting apparatus."! How duplicitous can a legislature get in its endeavors to avoid revealing its true intent? 38. 29. Hannam. 457. a vehicle being towed by a motor vehicle. and "corporations" have no ability to climb behind the steering wheel and be "in actual physical control of a vehicle upon a highway or . 12 S. J. "copartnerships". Supreme Court in excerpts from rulings thereof as set forth herein below in the following cases. 'willful' is used in the sense of 'intentional. 3 Barn. because "firms".S. "association". 226.. 29 N. & Ald.' Whatever one does intentionally. when the term "natural person" is intended by the Legislature to designate an artificial persona ! 39.
13 Pick. 358. 3 Cow. 220. if construed literally. Ryegate v. 358. evidently leads to an absurd result. would be prohibited on the basis of the principle of Estoppel. " "Among other things which may be considered in determining the intent of the legislature is the title of the act. Ex parte Ellis. 410. The language of the act. oppression. 479. 457. the act must be so construed as to avoid the absurdity. S. Co. 43. or an absurd consequence. (Hadden v. Kirby. 30 Vt. Osgood v." 41. is not "willfully" done when done under duress. Y. Y. Tilson. 11 Cal. there is another consideration as to what may or may not be "willful" that the Supreme Court did not mention in the foregoing: Bouvier’s Law Encyclopedia 3rd Rev. 100 U. 12 Mass. Burch v. In the case of U. Wardsboro. that an act done as a result of intentionally misleading indoctrination of the individual as a child. 486 "The question as to the sufficiency of this plea was certified to this court.S. Chief Justice MARSHALL said: 'On
. The reason of the law in such cases should prevail over its letter. Breed. Bank.. 743. Newbury. Fisher. or without the will to do it.554. General terms should be so limited in their application as not to lead to injustice. 30 Miss. If a literal construction of the words of a statute be absurd. Oates v. 482. 558. 89. or the retarding of the passage of a carrier of the mail. 4 Gill & J. 152. " " The following cases may also be cited: Henry v. People v. S.284. People v. 10 N. therefore. Back to SCOTUS in Holy Trinity: " In U. v. 2 Cranch. 8th Edition. E. 17 Vt. "To adopt such a construction would put a stop to the ordinary business of life. In its opinion the court says: 'All laws should receive a sensible construction.) but it may help to interpret its meaning.. Collins. and it not an obstruction of the mail. 525. Collector. in the foregoing SCOTUS opined that where a literal application of the wording of a statute would result in an absurd result. The object designed to be reached by the act must limit and control the literal import of the terms and phrases employed. be presumed that the legislature intended exceptions to its language which would avoid results of this character. 49. Lacombe. 1 N. 107. Crane. v.the actual intent. As SCOTUS stated. 5 Wall. 374. 7 Wall." 40. The court must restrain the words. People v. 1914 provides the meaning of "Involuntary" is as follows: "Involuntary. To adopt such a construction would put a stop to the ordinary business of life." 42. 99 N. It is clear that Bouvier’s meaning conveys that an act. An involuntary act is that which is performed with constraint or with repugnance.15 Johns. An act is involuntary when it is done under duress. In the above opinion there can be no reasonable doubt that SCOTUS intended its explanation of the common meaning of "willful" to only apply where the intentionally done act was done by an individual who was fully and properly informed of all of the ramifications of his "willful" act prior thereto. even though intentionally done. v. Ingraham v. 95 N. by the entity that was thereafter purporting to hold the individual to acts done as a result of the intentional misleading indoctrination. 386. We do not mean that it may be used to add to or take from the body of the statute. S. Rep. Wilbur v. 599. 530. the wording must "restrain the words". Insurance Co. Y. Additionally. 239. within the meaning of the act. [143 U. However. It will always. Baltimore & Ohio R. Chesapeake& Ohio Canal Co. 462]Commissioners. Jackson v. Speed. 43.
taken with other parts. In this instant case. The words 'any person or persons' are broad enough to comprehend every human being. it seizes everything from which aid can be derived. knowingly and intentionally. It is clearly the intention of the Legislature to exclude real live flesh and blood men and women from both! 47. 3 Wheat. expand the State’s authority beyond its reasonable boundaries. nothing is left to construction. " 44.' It would seem that offenses against the United States. The inclusion of such phraseology in the statutes of California may not be construed to in any way unconstitutionally expand such limited authority in order to unconstitutionally extend such authority over individuals who have not willingly. being fully informed of the negative consequences thereof
. 45. Where the intent is plain. Where the mind labors to discover the design of the legislature. through the general application of common words or phraseology. As the Constitution of both the United States and California prohibit involuntary servitude the Legislature cannot and did not use phraseology such as (or similar to) "all persons". The title of this act is. not offenses against the human race. and neither denies that. When taken together the definitions of the words "person" and the word "driver" are complementary. but may furnish some aid in showing what was in the mind of the legislature. and will have its due share of consideration. But general words must not only be limited to cases within the jurisdiction of the state. Neither party contends that the title of an act can control plain words in the body of the statute. 'An act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States. Palmer. were the crimes which the legislature intended by this law to punish. 610. By the Legislature’s failure to include the words "men" and "women" in the statutory definition of the word "person". and in such case the title claims a degree of notice. 46. the same judge applied the doctrine in this way: 'The words of the section are in terms of unlimited extent. who in a foreign ship may commit murder or robbery on the high seas? The title of an act cannot control its words. the general application of the common word "person" has been supplanted by the mere fact that the Legislature of California has created a statutory definition of this word and the statutory meaning contrived by the Legislature must be applied in accordance with the clear intent of such Legislature. the statutory definition of each supports the statutory definition of the other. S. but also to those objects to which the legislature intended to apply them. However true that may be. and would have included the words "men" and "women" in its statutory definition of the common word "driver". in order to extend the authority of California beyond its constitutionally established boundaries.the influence which the title ought to have in construing the enacting clauses. it may assist in removing ambiguities. if this were not true the Legislators would have included the words "men" and "women" in its definition of the word "person". the Legislature’s clearly demonstrated that their intent to supplant the commonly understood meaning of the word "person" to specifically exclude real live flesh and blood men and women. v. there are still limitations as to the application thereof. As stated in the above HOLY TRINITY excerpt.' And in the case of U. 631. SCOTUS therein opined that a state may not. and yet it is not easy to discern the point of difference between the opposing counsel in this respect. much has been said. Did the legislature intend to apply these words to the subjects of a foreign power.
is honesty and integrity of government in its relations with the general populace. California thereby compounds its unforgivable insidious criminal activities! A key word and principle here. An involuntary act is that which is performed with constraint or with repugnance. as I wrote herein above. The issue here. California intentionally attempts to reap benefits from the wrongful indoctrination of its criminal contemporaries. voluntarily agree to submit myself to the authority of the government of the artificial entity. 8th Edition. or without the will to do it. a trustee has a fiduciary obligation to the beneficiary of a trust and acts as a fiduciary in his management of the trust property. Bouvier’s meaning of "wilful" applies equally to an individual who was intentionally indoctrinated with lies in order to seduce him into "voluntarily" complying with California codes. An attorney has a fiduciary relationship with his client. on that issue. etc. The issue here is not whether or not I could use some birth certificate in order to be issued a driver license. California. is ESTOPPEL! 51. Per 28 USC § 3002: “Property” includes any present or future interest. the governments or the other Forty-nine states of the Federation known as the United States. "An act is involuntary when it is done as a result of having been intentionally and wrongfully indoctrinated by the lying government of California. or mixed property. in the nature of a position of trust or holding confidence. A person having a legal duty. 52. created by his undertaking. why should I? Can it be reasonably denied that I have the natural born and naturally acquired right to determine for myself whether or not I will "volunteer"? Until I willingly. whether legal or equitable.prior thereto. vested or contingent. in real. later. For example. but then. wherever located and however held (including community property and property held in trust (including spendthrift and pension trusts))… Property as per Title 18 United States Code. Pursuant to Section 2311 of the same code the Courts have stated that property is 'anything'. 1914 provides the meaning of "Involuntary" as follows: "Involuntary. tangible or intangible. that issue is of no immediate significance! However." 49. voluntarily agreed to submit them self to the authority of the government of the artificial entity. property includes. in this particular instance such criminal contemporary being the government of the artificial entity. Law Dictionary 4th Ed. California. but is not limited to real and personal property. the issue of whether there might be or is a birth certificate I could use in order for me to be issued an California driver license is a totally moot issue! Bouvier’s Law Encyclopedia 3rd Rev. A name is property as is our labor. to act primarily for the benefit of another in matters connected with his undertaking. personal (including choses in action). California." 50. knowingly and intentionally. And when California was not the actual perpetrator of the criminal indoctrination of the individual when the individual was a child. being fully informed of the negative consequences thereof prior thereto. "fiduciary".
. 48. An act is involuntary when it is done under duress.
nor do I have actual or constructive possession of the original Certificate of Live Birth.
. nor am I the fiduciary.The name associated with the debt is. and I own nothing. I am not and did not consent to be a party to the undertaking. I am the living man. derived of the original of the copy of the Certificate of Live Birth attached. in absence of evidence to the contrary.