Case 2:12-cv-01948-PGR--BSB Document 25 Filed 01/07/14 Page 1 of 3

1 2

MDR

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. Arnold James Begay, Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

No. CV 12-1948-PHX-PGR (BSB)

Defendant.

On September 13, 2012, Plaintiff Arnold James Begay, who is confined in the Federal Correctional Institution (FCI)-Marianna in Marianna, Florida, filed an untitled

Court noted that Plaintiff had not paid the $350.00 civil action filing fee or filed an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Court gave Plaintiff 30 days to pay the fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and warned Plaintiff that the Clerk of Court would enter a judgment of dismissal of the action, without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff, if he failed to either pay the filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed within 30 days. The Clerk of Court mailed the Order to Plaintiff at the Nevada Southern Detention Center, but the Order was returned to the Court as undeliverable, with a notation that Plaintiff was “Not [an] NSDC Detainee.” In a January 23, 2013 Order, the Court directed the Clerk of Court to update Plaintiff’s address and send a copy of the October 23 Order to Plaintiff at FCI-Herlong. In the Order, the Court also gave Plaintiff 30 days from the date the Order was filed to

FR

IE N

DS

OF

Document that appears to be a pro se Complaint. In an October 23, 2012 Order, the

TH

EF

United States President Barack Hussein Obama, II,,

OG
ORDER

BO

W

.C

OM

3

Case 2:12-cv-01948-PGR--BSB Document 25 Filed 01/07/14 Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

comply with the October 23 Order by either paying the filing fee or filing a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Court warned Plaintiff that the Clerk of

further notice to Plaintiff, if he failed to either pay the filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed within 30 days.

On March 18, 2013, the Clerk of Court entered Judgment, dismissing the action

within 30 days of the January 23 Order.

On March 20, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Extension of Time to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. In a May 7, 2013 Order, the Court vacated the Judgment, granted the Motion for Extension of Time, considered the Application to Proceed to be timely filed, and denied the Application to

fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and warned Plaintiff

prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff, if he failed to either pay the filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed within 30 days.

additional two motions. In a September 24, 2013 Order, the Court noted that Plaintiff’s June 6 and 20 Motions did not relate to the Court’s Order directing Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or file an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days. Because it had been significantly more than 30 days after the Court issued its May 7

FR

IE N

DS

Order and Plaintiff had failed to either pay the filing fee or file an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, the Court dismissed this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Rule

41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to comply with a Court order, and denied the pending motions. The Clerk of Court entered Judgment on September 24, 2013. .... -2-

OF

On June 6, 2013, Plaintiff filed two motions. On June 20, 2013, he filed an

TH

that the Clerk of Court would enter a judgment of dismissal of the action, without

EF

Proceed because it was deficient. The Court gave Plaintiff 30 days to either pay the filing

OG

BO

W

because Plaintiff had failed to either pay the filing fee or file an Application to Proceed

.C

OM

Court would enter a judgment of dismissal of the action, without prejudice and without

Case 2:12-cv-01948-PGR--BSB Document 25 Filed 01/07/14 Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

On November 4, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Document (Doc. 23) entitled “Order: for a Ruling on Rule 6.” In the Document, Plaintiff seeks an extension of time to file an

November 29, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Document (Doc. 24) entitled “Order for a ‘Full

Investigation’ and ‘Disclosures’ and ‘Discovery’ and ‘Rule 9 Release in a Criminal Case.’” Because this case is closed, the Court will deny as moot Plaintiff’s requests.

(1) (2) (3)

Plaintiff’s November 4, 2013 Document (Doc. 23) is denied as moot. Plaintiff’s November 29, 2013 Document (Doc. 24) is denied as moot. This case must remain closed.

Dated this 6th day of January, 2014.

FR

IE N

DS

OF

TH

EF
-3-

OG

BO

W

IT IS ORDERED:

.C

OM

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and pay the filing fee in this case. On

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful