9 views

Uploaded by kiurigan

save

- Complete Cv Calculation
- pipe flow
- 2012 SRI 02Stringe
- orkiweski
- Introduction to Cf d Module
- API PUB1585_01 Guidance in the Cleaning of Airport Hydrant Systems
- Comparative Analysis Fully Developed Turbulent Flow in Various Arbitrary Cross-Section Ducts using Finite Volume Approach
- A Combined Experimental and Three-Dimensional Numerical Study.pdf
- Part a Ch1024
- Computational Analysis of Heat Transfer by Natural Convection from Triangular Notched Fin Array
- Turbulent Flow .pdf
- Turbulent Boundary Layer
- Analysis and Design of Heat exchanger
- 1. Mechanical - IJMPERD - Inertia Effect Under Couple Stress Fluid in Porous Journal Bearing
- Achieving Hover Equilibrium in Free Flight With a Flexible Flapping Wing
- Review of Convective Heat Transfer from Plate Fins Under Natural and Mixed Convection at Different Inclination Angle
- Program Upload
- Dani
- Julien Simons
- 1919-On Convection Currents in a Horizontal Layer of Fluid When the Higher Temperature is on the Under Side-Lord Rayleigh-Philosophical Magazine

You are on page 1of 5

Printed in Great Britain

Vol. 24. No. 7. pp. 1287-1291.

I981

0017~9310/81/071?87~05 %02.00/o Pergamon Prw Ltd.

SHORTER COMMUNICATION

ON THE EXISTENCE OF THERMOCONVECTIVE ROLLS, TRANSVERSE TO A SUPERIMPOSED MEAN POISEUILLE FLOW J.-M. LUIJKX and J. K. PLATTEN

University of Mons, Faculty of Sciences, Department 7000 Mons, Belgium and J. CL. LEGROS University of Brussels, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Physical Chemistry, E.P., 1050 Brussels, Belgium (Received 16 December 1980) of Thermodynamics,

NOMENCLATURE 4

.2 ‘cI

depth

of the fluid layer

= -1.

;

kX, k

(E a) wave-number in the x-direction ; wave-number in the y-direction ; width of the fluid layer ; l,y’ length of the fluid layer; L, Prandtl number; Pr, flowrate of the fluid = (u)ld; Q> Rayleigh number ; Ra, Ra”, (Ra’), critical Ravleigh number corresponding to the onset of co%vection under the form of longitudinal (transverse) rolls ; Reynolds number using (u) as reference Re, velocity ; ‘critical’ Reynolds number (for which Ra” = Re*, Ra’); mean velocity of the fluid; velocity component in the z-direction of a perturbation ; amplitude of u, ; Cartesian coordinates (see Fig. 1); ( E k,) wave-number in the x-direction ; aspect ratio ; temperature difference between top and bottom of the fluid layer); thermal diffusivity ; length of a Benard cell; kinematic viscosity ; = oR + ip,: complex growth rate of a perturbation. 1. INTRODUCTION

In an infinite duct (Fig. 1) bounded by two horizontal rigid and conducting plates located at z = 0 and z = d, a liquid flows in the x-direction under the effect of a horizontal pressure gradient (Poiseuille flow). The system is heated from below and, in the absence of Poiseuille flow, free convection, with roll-pattern corresponding to a structure with two nonvanishing velocity components, is expected when the Rayleigh number exceeds its critical value 1708. For longitudinal rolls (0, = W(z) elk,!), it is well known that the critical Rayleigh number is unaffected by the flow [5,6], but for transverse rolls (u, = I@(z) e”-‘) the critical Rayleigh number increases with the Reynolds number [see Fig. 2(a)]. Usually, it is concluded that, when free convection occurs, the rolls must be longitudinal and that the mean flow has no influence on the onset of the secondary flow. However, this is only true in an infinite layer, and thus, this theoretical result cannot be used to understand completely the experimental findings of rl-41. In real containers.(of finite size). it is also well known-[7,8], that, in the absence of Poiseuillk flow and above the critical point, the rolls are aligned parallel to the shorter vertical sides of the box. In this paper, we will not give an important significancy to the difference between the Davis’ [7] ‘fim‘t e rolls’ calculations and the more realistic threedimensional calculations by Davies-Jones [8]. In an infinite channel of rectangular cross-section, (Fig. l), following the calculations by Davis or Davies-Jones, the critical Rayleigh number corresponding to finite transverse rolls must be smaller than the one corresponding to infinite longitudinal rolls. [Fig. 2(b) Ra’ i Ra”]. If a Poiseuille flow is imposed in the x-direction, characterised by its Reynolds number Re, Ra” is independent of Re (no effect of the Poiseuille flow on infinite longitudinal rolls) ; on the other side, Ra’ increases when Re increases (a stabilizing effect of the Poiseuille flow is expected when the disturbances are in the form of transverse rolls). Therefore, when looking at the smallest critical Rayleigh number, we conclude that, if the Poiseuille velocitv is small enough (Re -C Re*). rolls are aligned parallel to the ‘shorter’ Gdes, with their axis perpendicular to the flow direction (the effect of the side walls is dominant). When the shear exceeds some critical value (Re > Re*) convection occurs under the form of longitudinal rolls: this time, the effect of the flow is dominant. Thus, Re* is a particular Reynolds number at which transverse rolls become less stable than longitudinal rolls. This number Re* is a function of the aspect ratio /I = l/d and of the Prandtl number Pr = V/K. The aim of the hydrodynamic stability theory is to determine Ra’ = RaL (Re, p, Pr) and Ra” = Ra” (fi) and thus

ten years ago, one of us (J.K.P.) published ‘a preliminary experimental investigation of the stability of flows with an imposed temperature gradient’ [l]. In that work, using heat flow measurements, experimental evidence was given that the critical Rayleigh number (corresponding to the onset of free convection) is an increasing function of the Reynolds number, measuring the Poiseuiile velocity flow. These results, as well as other experimental findings (Legros et al. [2,3] and Klapitz and Weih [4]) on the stability of flows in multi-component systems heated from below, are not clearly understood yet. The present paper is a new contribution to the study of the stability of a Poiseuille flow heated from below, i.e. to the Rayleigh BCnard problem with a superimposed basic laminar flow.

ALMOST

1287

1. /I = I/d = 5. a veiy small value indeed. with such a high Prandtl number fluid.g. These porous media (from Porex. In theseconditions. The working volume is 1 x 5. (bl). E: enclosure.5 x 10m4 cm. Re* = G(1) and it is of some practical interest to accurately know the value of Ret and the flow structure: indeed the thermal diffusion studies by the ‘flow cell method’ [2-4] are conducted in this range (Re < 4). water). (a) Convection always occurs under the form of longitudinal rolls. (d) porous medium. convection occurs under the form of transverse rolls. Classically. Critical Rayleigh number vs Reynolds number. we shall restrict ourselves to silicone oil as working fluid in the range Re = 1O-3-1O-2. inserted between two thick (3 cm). it is constituted by a rectangular frame in Plexiglas. (a) copper plates. (c) reservoir.5 cm’ s-i (Fluid 200 from Dow Coming) is used.25 and this long cell looks like an infinite rectangular duct (L/d cx 100). Very regular patterns can easily be obtained with this component of high Prandtl number (Pr g 450) whose physical parameters do not vary rapidly with temperature. WORKING FLUID AND EXPERIMENTAL SET-UP media parallel to the smaller sides. Re* decreases when Pr increases [see Fig. In the present work. very small shears have to be used in order to observe transverse rolls. 2. in this study. Re* = O(lO-‘). Re* (/I. This work is now in progress and is to be published shortly [9]. . we found that with Pr = 450 and /I = 5. The temperatures of the plates are controlled by flow of thermoregulated water. the second. L -) K. we experimentally prove that transverse thermoconvective rolls exist when Re -c Re*. However for Pr = O(10) (e. But. System of coordinates.e. polished copper plates. Anyway. 3. i.5 cm3. 2(b)] and thus.1288 Shorter Communication FIG. 2. the existence of longitudinal rolls seems obvious. Fairburn) are 2 mm thick and high density polyethylene constituted. Experimental set-up. is to conserve symmetry of the cell. We built an observation cell which is shown as a schematic in Fig. the pore sizes are 3. (f) valve. At higher values of the Reynolds number. In the ‘infinite’ problem. (b) If Re < Re*.25 x 93. Glasrock.&-kbJ I le) (el FIG. 3. 1 + cc Re (a) (b) Re FIG. (e) temperature measurements. From our numerical results [9]. Re* decreases when Pr increases. Silicone oil is injected by gravity in this volume through two porous (b. Pr). located in the outlet part. The convective structure which is eventually produced is observed by a shadowgraph method through the Plexiglas Silicone oil with kinematic viscosity of 0. (b2) flows of thermoregulated water. The role of the first porous plate is to reduce the residual level of turbulence in the inlet part to a very low value.

25 [lo]. walls by means of the thermal lens effect.5 cm between the two porous walls. 4. It corresponds to very regular transverse rolls whose number is O(10’) (kcri’= 3. Thermal lens effect: schema.0 Re x 10. transverse rolls. The runs’ numbers are in parentheses. Visualization of transverse convective rolls. 4.2 o(6) 17 In all the experiments reported below (Fig.0 0. FIG. We first determine the critical temperature difference at which free convection sets in and we find ATEd’ = 0. a view such as that given in Fig.Shorter Communication 1289 FIG.5 I 9. Indeed if we first heat the system from below at Re = 0. In absence of free convection. Pi = 2n/3. 4 cannot be observed. 4(b). FIG. inducing rolls parallel to the shorter sides. the eventually resulting transverse rolls.0 IO3 FIG. . A typical photograph of a part of a structure which can be observed near the critical point is shown in Fig. 0 x P 1. Characteristic photograph. 5) (except in runs 0 and 7) we first impose a Poiseuille flow and after this we heat from below.o I 1 5. i.e. This yields a critical Rayleigh number R&’ = 1711 + 55 which is in perfect agreement with the theoretical value Racrit = 1712 for b = 5. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS ” x 10: cm s-1 5. In the 93. This leads to a critical wavenumber kc’” = 3. we observe 92 rolls.117. or when the rolls are longitudinal.0 (0) I o(7) > I I ( . thus one roll has a width lerit/2 equal to its height. 5.95”C + 0. could be a consequence of these initial conditions. 3.09 and this is Run 0: 1.5 I 2. Experiments. and afterwards if we impose a Poiseuille flow. 4(a).117 zz 2).03.

2 x 10e3 and AT = 1. Run 4: Same as run 3 but AT = 15°C. one should write for the zcomponent of the velocity perturbation of transverse rolls 0. = 1. After one day. z) e(icKr-ot).2”C. Reynolds number Re = od v = 0. Run 3: Q = 3. very near the critical point. AT = 1.(x. z)e’~@x-‘. which were rapidly pushed out the cell when the Poiseuille flow was imposed. . Q 8.z.. Once more.(x. Re =0. Equation (4) is the equation of a travelling wave whose velocity {which should be the velocity of the rolls system) is 1. Therefore. AT = 2. These two runs clearly show that transverse rolls exist and are stable at small Reynolds numbers. except in the first 12 cm of the duct. Indeed.M. . Re = 1.38(u) obtained at Ra z 2.64 x lO_“cm SK’. z.2”C. We found that this velocity Uro. but this situation is not completely understood yet. This corresponds to an increase of the wavelength which is also in agreement with other works (see for instance [ 111I. wishes to thank the Institut pour I’Encouragement de la Recherche Scientifique dans I’Industrie et I’Agriculture for a grant. This result should be compared with the experimental value of Uro. Without changing the flow rate Q.5 x 10-3cms-‘. (u) = 1. (u) = 4. = 1. the rolls are probably less unstable than in run 3. transverse rolls have to be obtained back. but after three days the region without visible structure has grown till to 34cm. is greater than (u). t) = *(y. After stopping the thermal gradient during 4 h and imposing it back at its initial value. but these rolls look unstable. A possible explanation is the following: in the framework of a linear stability analysis. inducing steady transverse rolls. (I) At the critical point. The mean velocity is given by {u) = Q/S. the time needed to produce a regular roll pattern is of the order of two days.6 x lo-“ cm3 s-’ (estimated error 1%).(x. we first stop the Poiseuille flow. t) = lV(q’. This is not convenient at all : in the presence of Poise&he flow. (u) = 7.328 x low3 : temperature difference AT = 25°C. Indirectly this proves theexistenceoflongitudinalrollsat Re = 11.RC”) and the available theory is only valid ‘for Ra = Ra”“. in run 7 we have an indirect proof of the existence of such longitudinal rolls. A linear hydrodynamic stability theory cannot account for such II . An accurate experimental determination of Re* is not very easy and is now undertaken for different height to width ratios and for different fluids in order to study_the influence of both Prandtl number and aspect ratio.4 x 10m3 for Pr = 450 and /I = 5.7 x 10-3cms-‘. namely also in agreement with the theory. transverse rolls are more and more difficult to be formed. These latest runs show that if the shear is increased.4 x 10-s. Let us remark that all the preceding runs were performed with Re < Re* (Re* = 6.1 x IO-‘. T = 9.2”C. the time needed to obtain a steady state must be much smaller than the residence time of the fluid in the duct.. (2) In our numerical study [9] we fitted the following empirical law 0. Of course. transverse rolls appeared again in the whole apparatus with i.= 0. Run 7: Re = 11. We suppose the presence of longitudinal rolls. z)ei~@w-o~tJ. y. (3) Remem~ring that in equation (2) all the variables are dimensionless and that the scaling factor for the time is d’/K.z.2”C. Run6: Re = 3.25). but this is still to be demonstrated.SaRePr.5% Transverse roils are formed rapidly near the porous walls as soon as the destabilizing temperature gradient is imposed. Indeed the pattern depends not only-on the Reynolds number. AT = 25°C. once the rolls are formed.l. This is illustrated by the following runs. = Fit..1 x 10e4 cm s-i . after one day there remains only 29 transverse rolls in the last 40 cm of the duct (the outlet part) and no structure was visible in the first 60cm of the duct (the inlet part). Therefore. Run 2: Q = 2. these longitudinal rolls play the role of an initial condition of finite amplitude. the presumed longitudinal rolls are destroyed and therefore. 4. Because the porous walls it is not possible to observe longitudinal structures in the xdirection. Re = 2. even after 24 h. y. after the reset of the thermal gradient. We still observed transverse rolls but with a completely different size: 2. They are stable: after three days the whole duct is still filled with the same number of rolls. this yields u. After a few hours. This initial condition prevails over the boundary conditions and inhibits the formation of transverse rolls. Thelast question to bediscussed is the velocity at which the transverse rolls are convected by the Poiseuille flow.L. the real part of D is vanishing and therefore L). Run 5: Q = 5.1290 Shorter Communication a large effect.95 x LOW4 cm s-i . Run 1: Total flow rate Q = 210 cm3 in 67 h 59 m = 8.05 x 10d3 cm s-’ .38 x (u). we increase the temperature difference up to 25°C and we observe that 85 transverse rolls appeared.25 = 1.7 x lo-‘.2 x 10m3 > Re*.6 x lo-“ mean velocity {u) = s = ___-_ 5.8?. CONCLUSION We proved the existence of stable transverse rolls at small Reynolds numbers and for higher shear values we have an indirect proof that the rolls are parallel to the flow direction. there are transverse rolls everywhere. at which this roll is convected. but also on the distance from the critical noint (Ra .2”C: when the flow is stopped.. If we stop heating during 4 h. we first impose AT = 1. However. In this last run.5 Racri’.6 x 10-3cm3s-1. t) = bi’(y..a.95 x 1O-3. no transverse structure appeared again.“” (%crii is the critical wavelength corresponding to RA = Racrir and Re = 0).y.5(u)r) (4) in which all the variables are dimensional. AT = 25°C. it is easy to follow the image of a particular roll on a screen and to determine the velocity U. we observe 85 transverse rolls which are travelling with a velocity greater than (U). rolls are formed rapidly near the porous boundaries but no more structure was visible in the duct the day after.Thedistancefromthe critical point has been increased up to Ra = 10Ra”“’and the shear is also increased.5(u). in an experiment at Re = 0 and AT = 1. We observed the formation of 87 stable transverse rolls. ~eknowledge~nt-J.

Davies-Jones.-M. Phys 15. J. Angew. 4. J. 194-200. E. Physica 51. 5. Thomaes. Luijkx and J. Thomaes. Lefebvre. Z. Fluid Mech. (1981). Vol. K. Note on flow instability in heating ducts. 26 pp. 3. 6. Physique Cl. 695-704 (1970). P. 2. 7. Thermodiffusion et stabiliti en ecoulement laminaire . R. Weill. C. Poty. 145-149 (1976). . K.-M. J. Fluid Mech. C. Koschmieder. Math. J. S. Ziir Stabilitlt der Striimung in einem horizontalen Rohr bei ungleichmassig erwarter Wand. 9. Davis. J. John Wiley. 10. Klapitx and M. J. Rasse and G. Advances in Chemical Physics.-C. New York (1974). W. Platten. 330-332 (1971). 585-593 (1972). Onset offreeconvection in a rectangular channel submitted to a laminar flow : a new critical Reynolds number (to be published). Sani. 8. Z. Velte. 1. 44. L. Physica 57. Convection in a box : linear theory. E. H. Thermal convection in an infinite channel with no-slip sidewalls. Math. On the onset of free convection in a rectangualr channel. Z. Thermal Diffusion in a flowing layer with normal and adverse temperature gradients in the Ccl. Naturforsch.Shorter Communication REFERENCES 1291 1. Non-Equilib. Angew. 1915-1916 (1974). Luijkx and J. D. K. 30. Thermodyn 6(3). 11. C. Legros. 591-600 (1962). A preliminary experimental investigation of the stability of flows with an imposed temperature gradient. Legros and G. J. R. Platten and M. Phys 13. system. 29. 465-478 (1967).H. 381-387 (1964). Thermal diffusion in some binary liquid mixtures by the flowing cell method. P. Platten.I.

- Complete Cv CalculationUploaded bygalant_pp
- pipe flowUploaded byAneesha Farzu
- 2012 SRI 02StringeUploaded byricky.pigazzini
- orkiweskiUploaded bygrandehernan26
- Introduction to Cf d ModuleUploaded byResul Sahin
- API PUB1585_01 Guidance in the Cleaning of Airport Hydrant SystemsUploaded byjhon
- Comparative Analysis Fully Developed Turbulent Flow in Various Arbitrary Cross-Section Ducts using Finite Volume ApproachUploaded byIRJET Journal
- A Combined Experimental and Three-Dimensional Numerical Study.pdfUploaded byAli AH
- Part a Ch1024Uploaded byashishkapoorsrm
- Computational Analysis of Heat Transfer by Natural Convection from Triangular Notched Fin ArrayUploaded byIJSTE
- Turbulent Flow .pdfUploaded byVinod Kumar Patel
- Turbulent Boundary LayerUploaded byNanaNaurah95
- Analysis and Design of Heat exchangerUploaded bypetey9170
- 1. Mechanical - IJMPERD - Inertia Effect Under Couple Stress Fluid in Porous Journal BearingUploaded byTJPRC Publications
- Achieving Hover Equilibrium in Free Flight With a Flexible Flapping WingUploaded byiwe1234
- Review of Convective Heat Transfer from Plate Fins Under Natural and Mixed Convection at Different Inclination AngleUploaded byIRJET Journal
- Program UploadUploaded byJaher Wasim
- DaniUploaded byRodrigo Ramos
- Julien SimonsUploaded byAdebowaleIsmailGaniyu

- 1919-On Convection Currents in a Horizontal Layer of Fluid When the Higher Temperature is on the Under Side-Lord Rayleigh-Philosophical MagazineUploaded bykiurigan
- conception-des-systèmes-de-tuyauteries-sous-pression-4th.pdfUploaded bykiurigan
- H. R. Byers, H. E. Landsberg, H. Wexler, B. Haurwitz, A. F. Spilhaus, H. C. Willett, H. G. Houghton (Auth.), Thomas F. Malone (Eds.)-Compendium of Meteorology_ Prepared Under the Direction of the CommUploaded bykiurigan
- غسيل المخ.pdfUploaded bykiurigan
- 2015-Natural Convection in Shear-Thinning Yield Stress Fluids in a Square Enclosure Ch.li a.magnin C.metivierUploaded bykiurigan
- Retrieving the Bingham Model From a Bi-Viscous Model-Some Explanatory RemarksUploaded bykiurigan
- 1981-Precise Measurements of the Wavelength at the Onset of Rayleigh-benard Convection in a Long Rectangular Duct-J. M. LUIJKX and J. K. PLATTENUploaded bykiurigan
- 2000-Experiments on Rayleigh-Bénard convection, magneto-convection and rotating magneto-convection in liquid gallium-J. M. AURNOU, P. L. OLSONUploaded bykiurigan
- texte_honnoreUploaded bykiurigan

- Apostila Mquinas de FluxoUploaded byAndrey Viecelli
- k Calibration of Venturi and Orifice MetersUploaded byKitty V
- Irrigation Activity No. 1Uploaded byJeiel Valencia
- Apuntes de fluidos.pdfUploaded byJaviera Pereira
- AlvaroBN_TESEUploaded byAmanda Campos
- Problems on Fluid PropertiesUploaded byLucky Malihan
- CARTILLA DE MECÁNICA DE FLUIDOS.docxUploaded byLilianitaRizo
- Homero Capítulo-7 ESLivres 09112011 Aula1Uploaded byLorena Vieira
- Self Priming PumpUploaded bymoejamal80
- ENGR 30714 S15Uploaded byChandan Prasai
- Experimento de ReynoldsUploaded byLuis Eduardo Zampar Filho
- Salto-Hidraulico-final.docxUploaded byKenny Saavedra Campos
- 10 Calor Ondas Optica Laboratorio 07 Principio de Pascal y Tiempo de 2016-IUploaded byDark-Win M. Chalko
- Study of Unsteady Cavitation on NACA66 HydrofoilUploaded byvictoria
- Cohesion and Adhesion _ Boundless PhysicsUploaded byAgniva Dutta
- Mecanica Dos Fluidos - Cap6Uploaded byjaderson_araujo
- 08 - Reología de los CementosUploaded bychristian463
- 03 External Convection.pdfUploaded byAnonymous 2T2JQNF
- Capa LímiteUploaded byArturo Mena
- AE1101-Intro-3Uploaded byHemanthKumar
- TestePrevioP1.pdfUploaded byDébora Rodrigues
- viscosidadUploaded byJuan Ñato
- Model GDKUploaded byCristian Barbuceanu
- ComandosEletrohidráulico e Eletropneumático 2012Uploaded byruilima2004
- Aspects of Across-Wind Loads and Effects on Large Reinforced Concrete ChimneysUploaded byAnonymous hprsT3WlP
- ViscosityUploaded byJeimmy Paola Díaz
- Paper Water HammerUploaded byPatel Amit
- Simulation of Lamellar Flow Inside a PipeUploaded bysourav ghosh
- OrkiszewskiUploaded byDamisi Pikuda
- Prova Transferencia Calor Analise TermicaUploaded byMarcelo Gau