Huns and Türks

Illustration Index

Illustration 1: Huns 1000 !.....................................................5 Illustration 2: Huns 210 !.......................................................5 Illustration 3: "omponius #ela $ca. %0 A&'...............................( Illustration %: "tolem)*s Huns+E.Europian tri,es scheme..........( Illustration 5: HunsAt the ,e-innin- o. /e0 Era.......................1 Illustration (: 2)an,i 3a-anate 155+325 A&.............................1 Illustration 1: E.T4rks* ana,asis 2(5 5 %(5 A&.........................1

Illustration 6: 7est Huns 5th c. A&...........................................6 Illustration 9: 8u9ans+3ushans+Hephtalitesca A& 500................6 Illustration 10: 3ushan (th c. A&..............................................6 Illustration 11: :okt4rk :umile; ethnical lines (th c. A&........6 Illustration 12: 7. :okt4rk 3a-anate 1th c. A&.........................9 Illustration 13: 3ha<aria &omain 10th c. A&.............................9

=ne o. the ada-es heard .rom some> not necessaril) limited to less educated> proponents o. the Hun*s non+T4rkic ori-in> is that the T4rks did not e?ist ,e.ore the (th c. A&> 0hen the) assem,led their o0n state that 0as lar-el) con-ruous 0ith> and o;erlapped the state o. the Huns. That ar-ument is re.uted ,) the kno0n .act that names e;ol;e and chan-e> and the same people in di..erent periods are kno0n under di..erent names: a -ood e?ample are the )<antines> aka @omans> aka :reeks> aka Ionians> aka #acedonians> 0ho could not ha;e ,een possi,l) called )<antines ,e.ore the )<antine came a,out almost t0o millennia a.ter the Ionian :reeks reached alkans and esta,lished there :reek colonies> and could not ha;e ,een possi,l) called @omans ,e.ore the :reece 0as anne?ed ,) the @oman Empire. ut under e;er) name> their lan-ua-e is indisputa,l) :reek> and their ethnolo-ical distinctions are indisputa,l) :reek> e;en so at the time 0hen the) 0ere called #acedonians. I. in the toda)*s nomenclature the lin-uistic .amil) and the ethnos are called T4rkic> in other periods the) 0ere called Hunnic> 2c)thian> Tatar> etc. #ore than that> the main ,od) o. the T4rkic people consisted o. Tele tri,es> and the main ,od) o. the Hun people consisted o. Ai-ur tri,es> and it is a Buirk o. the .ate that the modern descendents o. the Tele people are called T4rks> and not somethin- like Telen-uts> Tele-u<es> Teleuts> and that the modern name o. the Huns is not Ai-urs. Another o,ser;ation a,out the Huns> T4rks> and 2c)thians is the ama<in- s)mmetr) o. their -eo-raphical and political de;elopment. At the da0n o. the historical period> 0hen literac) 0as limited to the #iddle Eastern area o. the inha,ited 0orld> 0e learn that the same people> called 3an-> le.t their .ootprint in the space spannin- .rom the #iddle Asia to the #iddle East. A millennium later> in the histo+ rical period> 0e ha;e 2c)thians> 0ho .rom their states in 2outh 2i,eria and Tu;a ;entured to esta,lish their states in the #iddle East and /."ontic> soon a.ter the 0a;e o. the literac) reached the Car East. In the later historical period> 0e ha;e Huns 0ho esta,lished their state co;erin- 2outh 2i,eria and Tu;a> reachin- .rom the #iddle Asia to the Car East> and e;entuall) esta,lishin- a state in the Eastern and !entral Europe. A .e0 centuries later> in the same place 0e see the T4rks> 0ho stretched their state .rom the !entral Asia to the Eastern Europe. All these e?pansions> in addition to the temporal s)mmetr)> ha;e a common denominator: these people 0ere horse+mounted 0arriors> the) produced ;ast herds o. horses> the) ;alued trade opportunities> the) e?panded .rom a steppe pasture area to a steppe pasture area> and the) settled in suita,le areas. Histor) le.t us traces o. these e;ents. I. the ethnon)m T4rk came a.ter a leader under that name> it happened man) centuries ,e.ore the name T4rk ,ecame an ethnon)m> and still more centuries ,e.ore the name T4rk ,ecame a politon)m. The .irst kno0n records o. the T4rks are millenniums older then the modern notions o. the lin-uistic .amil) and the ethnos termed T4rkic. DIn the mid+.irst centur) A& $i.e.> ,e.ore 50 A&'> Turkae DTurksD are mentioned there $li;in- in the .orests north o. the 2ea o. A<o;' ,) "omponius #ela.D E!. eck0ith $2009'> DEmpires o. the 2ilk @oadD> p.115> 3.!<e-led) $1963> DCrom east to 7estD'> ".:olden $1992> DIntroduction to the histor) o. the Turkic peopleD'F. In the mid+.irst centur) A& the /."ontic steppes 0ere occupied ,) 2armatians> the con-lomerate o. the European tri,es 0ere headed ,) 2armatians> 0ho ruled man) tri,es> and amon- these man) tri,es alread) 0ere the tri,es o. Turkae DTurksD. The Turkae DTurksD Dare also mentioned in the /atural Histor) o. "lin) the Elder $i.e> ,e.ore 11 A&'> spelled T)rkae DT4rksD. E!. eck0ith $2009> I,id'> p.115> &.2inor $1990> D!am,rid-e Histor) o. Earl) Inner AsiaD'> p. 265FD. These Gatin classical re.erences to the T4rks are direct and o;ert> and should ,e .amiliar to an) proponent o. an) Eurasian ethnolin-uistic theor)> the) should ,e comple+ mented ,) the topon)mic terms that are still mistreated as unkno0n pro;enance. In the #iddle Asia> at the same !lassical AntiBue time are minted coins that use the 0ord DT4rkD as an ad9ecti;al s)non)m o. the 0ord DstateD EA. #ukhamadie; $1995> DGin-uoethnohistor) o. the Tatar peopleH'F. Cor the same time>

"tolem) does not mention the /."ontic T4rks per se> ,ut instead places Huns and Ases in or around the present #oldo;a> places the Hunno+ ul-arian patentl) T4rkic tri,e 2a;ars ri-ht in the /."ontic se;en ri;ers area in the head0aters o. &on and 2e;er $2a;ar' &onets> and places A-ath)rs around the !arpat+ hian mountains conti-uous 0ith 2a;ars. These .acts re.ute the ar-ument that the T4rks did not e?ist ,e.ore the (th c. A&> e;en i. the non+e?istence ar-ument 0as not other0ise patentl) .ault). These .acts not onl) do not contradict the other .acts o. the Huns> 2a,irs> Ases li;in- north o. the literate Indians or north o. the literate !hinese> the) demonstrate once a-ain that pastoral tri,es can split and o;ercome -reat distances to -ro0 their herds 0ith a reasona,le pro?imit) to the tradin- markets. The) also lead us to ,etter understandin- 0h)> in dire times> the ,ulk o. population mo;ed across ;ast distances to re+ 9oin their kin.olk> an e..ect o,ser;ed o;er and o;er a-ain .or an) historicall) documented catacl)sm in the li.e o. the pastoral T4rks. Anlike the sedentar) T4rks> the pastoral T4rks melt a0a) in unkno0n direction> onl) to reappear a-ain in a ne0 location a0a) .rom .rom the dan-er. E?amples are plethora: Tochars+Ases mo;in- a0a) .rom the Huns> Huns mo;in- a0a) .rom the #on-ols and !hinese> T4rks mo;in- a0a) .rom the Ai-urs and !hinese> Ai-urs mo;in- a0a) .rom the 3ir-i<es and !hinese> and so on> all that in addition to the all instances that escaped a record o. histor). 2ima Iian stated> on the e;idence o. the precedin- !hinese records $ am,oo Annals'> that the Jion-nu*s rulin- clan 0ere descendants o. !hun0ei $D!hun tri,esH> another .orm o. codin- the 0ord Hun'> possi,l) a son o. 8ie> the .inal ruler o. the le-endar) Jia &)nast) $ca. 2010+1(00 !'. E5F ut the arri;al o. the pastoral nomads en-a-ed in horse hus,andr) in the East Asian steppes is dated to no earlier that the 12th c. !. The oldest phoneti<ation o. the name DHunD had di..erent !hinese .orms: in the earlier pre+historic period the Huns 0ere called Hu and 8un $8un-'> in the late pre+historic period the Huns 0ere called Hun+)ui> in the literate period startin- 0ith Kin &)nast) $1(00+10%( !' the) 0ere called> in Lhou period $10%5M25( !' the) 0ere called H)an+)un> startin- .rom the Iin period $ 221+20( !' the !hinese annalists called them 0ith a derisi;e Hunnu $!h. Jion-nu> Dmalicious sla;eD'> as 0as stated ,) 2ima Iian. E(FE1F That the D+)ui/+)un/+9unD portion 0as a tri,al name compo+nent is a .reBuent re.erence in the !hinese annals> a most kno0n and direct e?ample 0as illustrated ,) 7an#an-*s chan-e in the 15 !E o. the Hun*s state seal le-end D.rom Dnon+semanticall) meanin-.ulD hiero-l)ph DshanD 單 0ith identicall) soundin- hiero-l)ph DshanD 單 meanin- Dkind> -oodD. A.ter the chan-e o. the hiero-l)ph> the title $ 2han)u' assumed a meanin- D3ind KuiD or D:ood KuiD .D E6F $.rom Jion-nu !han)u Ji/Hunnu !han)u 2eal to Jin Hun-nu !han)u Lhan-//e0 Hunnu :ood Ku ad-eN another chan-e 0as .rom O.erociousO to Orespect.ulO N an) rendition that does not displa) these chan-es is non+authentic translation .rom !lassic?al !hinese to modern !hinese' D7an- :uo0ei... came to a conclusion that the tri,al names .ound in the sources>> Hun+i> 24n+)ui $H4n+)ui'> 2)an+)un $H)an+ )un'> 8un $8un-'> &i> and Hu desi-nated one and the same people> 0hich later entered histor) under a name 24nnu $Hunnu'D E9F e.ore the ad;ent o. the Imperial period in the !hinese histor)> the relations ,et0een nomadic pastoralists and settled a-riculturists 0ere Buite amica,le. 2ima Iian recorded that in (3( !E> D#u+ -)un> a "rince o. the 8in principalit)> enticed Kuiui tri,e> and ei-ht possessions o. the 7estern 8uns to su,mit ;oluntar) to the House o. 8in: .or this reason .rom the Gun 0est0ard 0ere located -enerations :un+ch9u $Hun tri,es'> :uan+8un- $:uan Huns'> &i+0an $&i tri,es> apparentl) a reduced 2ini.ied .orm o. Tele'> .rom the Ii and G)an mountains> .rom the ri;ers :in+shui and Ii+shui to the north 0ere located 8un-s o. the -enerations Ikui $T0o Ais'> &ali $:reat Gi'> Ach+9) $Three tri,es> apparentl) 3arluks'> and 2ui+ )an $2ui tri,e'N .rom the 8in principalit) to the north 0ere located 8un-s o. the -enerations Ginhu and Geu.anN .rom the Kan principalit) to the north 0ere located -enerations &un+Hu $#on-ols' and 2han+8un $#ountain Huns'. All these -enerations li;ed dispersed in the mountain ;alle)s> had their o0n so;erei-ns and elders> .reBuentl) -athered in a lar-e num,er o. clans> ,ut could not unite.D E10FE11F The alliances 0ere rein.orced ,) mutual matrimonial unions that produced hal.+,reed o..sprin-s> and 0ere ,ene.icial to the principalities> as the) -ained instantaneous rein.orcement ,) the ca;alr) troops. The record o. (3( ! si-ni.ied a milestone in the T4rkic+!hinese relationsN the pre;ious s)m,iotic relations are alluded to in the annals> ,ut are not speci.ic. Crom the (3( ! on> the process o. mutual lin-uistic enrichment lasted until 0ell into the #odern A-e. A num,er o. philolo-ical 0orks addressed the su,9ect> a most prominent o. 0hich 0as the cardinal 0ork o. #.8.Hashimoto DAltaici<ation o. /orthern !hineseD> 0hich ,rou-ht a solid .oundation under man) prior o,ser;ations.

Ander the name &i> the Tele tri,es appeared on the pa-es o. histor) in the 6th c. ! in the territor) o. the a state> and .rom that time on the) are acti;e participants in the !hinese histor)> numerous times culminatin- in their o0n ri-ht as creators o. their o0n states in the territor) o. the modern !hina: !hen- Han $303+3%1'> Cormer Iin $351+39%'> Gater Gian- $36(+%03'> 3i,ir $(05+(10'> 2e)anto $(31+(%(' 3a-anatesN and 3imak $1%3+1050' 3a-anate in the #iddle Asia outside o. !hinese d)nastic pur;ie0N as decisi;e .orce in the .ates o. man) !hinese and Hunnish/T4rkic/Ai-ur T4rkic states> and a main participant in the #iddle A-e Eastern European 3ipchak state $10(0+1230' and #on-ol Empire. In the !hinese annalistic records> the Tele tri,es appear as a po0er.ul .orce used as mercenaries or allies .or centuries> in;aria,l) re+appearin- a.ter an) calamit) under a sle0 o. di..erent names ,e.ore and a.ter codi.ication o. the !hinese annalistic script> and in;a+ria,l) 0ith their distinct nomadic culture. The a and 2hu de;eloped their o0n 0ritin- s)stems> one picto-raphic and t0o possi,l) phonetic scripts> still undeciphered. The ancient histor) o. the Tele ended 0ith their inclusion in Hun state> 0hen direct re.erences to them appeared onl) in the descriptions o. the con.licts ,et0een the Tele and Huns. !hinese chronicles carr) numerous statements on the lin-uistic and ethnolo-ical closeness or identit) o. the man) Hunnic tri,es. Amon- them are direct statements: + 7eishu $102: 22(6' and eishi $91: 3219+3220' sa) that the customs and lan-ua-e o. DKue,an Jion-nuH 0ere the same 0ith the :aoche $P !hile> Tiele Q Tele Turkic con.ederationN Kue,an Q D0eak HunsH> i.e. a lesser splinter o. Hun massi;e'. + eishi $96: 3210+3211' -i;es the ancestr) le-end o. the the :aoche 0hich link them 0ith the Jion-nu . ++ Lhoushu $50: 901' and eishi $99: 3265' state that the Tu9ue $T4rks> :Rk T4rks' 0ere a separate ,ranch o. the Jion-nu $Huns'. + 2uishu $6%: 1619' states that the ancestors o. Tiele $P !hile> Tiele> Tele' 0ere descendents o. Jion-nu $Huns'. + Jin Tan-shu $211: (111' sa)s that the ancestors o. Huihe $AiSurs' are the Jion-nu $Huns'. All Turkic scholars kno0 the ,asics> are acBuainted 0ith A,u+l :a<i and the like -enealo-ical sources> and kno0 the Huns as their ancestors. The list o. the past non+Turkic eminent scholars 0ho ackno0led-e that the Huns 0ere Turkic co;ers the 0hole alpha,et: Altheim> a<in> ernshtam> !ha;annes> !lauson> de :ui-nes> E,erhard> Cranke> :rousset> :umile;> Haussi-> Hirth> Ho0orth> 3laproth> 3rouse> Gin :an>> #arBuart> #a Lhanshan> #c:o;ern> /emeth> "arker> "elliot> "ricak $"ritsak'> @adlo..> @emusat> @ou?> 2amolin> 2<as<> and 7an- :uo0ei. The onl) complete sur;i;in- Hunnic phrase lea;es no dou,ts that the Huns> Ai-urs> Tele> and their man) kins spoke T4rkicN that phrase 0as uttered in 311 A&> centuries ,e.ore the tri,e called T4rk -ained u,iBuitous .ame> ,e.ore the Huns -ained omnipresent .ame in Europe> and millennia ,e.ore the ;er) concept o. the T4rkic lan-ua-es had .ormed. =ne must tr) hard to ,e an o;erl) Buali.ied philolo-ist 0ith ma-ical sli-ht o. hands to su,ter.u-e the o,;ious:
!hinese En-lish Transcription 24Z) tili-an> "u-u*B4i tudan/tudar !)rillic Transcription [\]^_ `_a_bcd> Tebe*fg\h `eYcd/`eYcV #odern T4rkic 24Z) dile-an> "u-u*)u tutar T4rkic in !)rillic [\]^_ Y_aUbcd> Tebe*\ `e`cV Translation Arm) head*d take o..> 7ould capture "u-u TUVUWXY iVjUUf kXhYU`> lcmWc`_` Tebe

/ot onl) all the 0ords ha;e T4rkic roots> ,ut the a--lutinati;e -rammar is the same too> +Z)> +-)u/)u> +-an> +dan are all listed in the #.3ash-ari dictionar) 0ith the same .unction. The last consonant in the phrase could ,e ,oth +n> and +r transcri,ed in !hinese as +nN the modern =-u< conditional a..i? +)u 0as supposed to sound +-)u in =-ur. The !hinese chroniclers should ,e -i;en ample credit .or accurac) o. the phonetical rendition> the T4rkic lan-ua-e must ,e -i;en credit .or sta,ilit) o. the a--lutinati;e lan-ua-e> so in.initel) contrastin- 0ith the .le?i;e En-lish or "ersian. The pro,a,ilit) that a random 2%+ phoneme phrase in one lan-ua-e 0ould match e?actl)> phoneticall) and semanticall)> a 2%+phoneme phrase in unrelated lan-ua-e can ,e calculated ,) an) hi-h school -raduate> and it 0ould reBuire printed 9*s to .ill e;er) scrap o. paper on this Earth. The Eastern and 7estern Huns ,elon-ed to the =-ur lin-uistic .amil)> toda) it is modestl) called 3arluk -roup. In the AntiBue "eriod> the =-ur .amil) 0as much more ;isi,le then the =-u< .amil)> due to their pro?imit) to the literate southern populations. Crom the ethnon)ms and recorded relicts o. the lan-ua-e> the =-ur -roup included> in addition to the Huns> the Tochars> 3an-ars> Ai-urs> 3arluks> ul-ars> 3ha<ars> 2a,irs> A-ath)rs> A;ars> and tentati;el) e;er) other ethnicall) distinct population that ends its name on +ar/+er/+ir/+ur. !on;ersel)> the =-u< .amil) should include the tri,es 0ith the ethnon)m endin- on +a</+e</+i</+u<> ,ut that does not happen. The historicall) attested =-u< tri,es> 0ith historicall) attested =-u< lan-ua-es> carr) all kinds o. ethnon)ms e?cept those endin- on +a</+e</+i</+u< $and +ash in !hi;ash> and +i< in Edi<'. That indicates that the tri,al ethnon)ms are older then the +r/+s split> and the tri,es on +ar/+er/+ir/+ur do not necessaril) ,elon- to the =-ur -roup. The su,9ect o. the A</As tri,e is a separate topic> historicall) the) 0ere a..iliated 0ith almost e;er),od) in the #iddle Asia area> e?tendinas .ar as as the #iddle East> as A<+kishi o. the Ass)rians> and !entral Europe and the Car East. The .act that the Ases 0ere T4rkic does not raise an) dou,ts> their predominant a..iliation 0ith the T4rkic or T4rkic+in.ected #on-olic lan-ua-es is a pre;ailin- e;idence o. their lin-uistic pre.erences. Crom the -limpses o. the historical records> it appears that the +r/+s split happened 0ithin the 3an-ar tri,es> producin- the t0o pra+ethnoses> the 3an-ars and the Ases. The Ases 0ere located north o. 3an-ars> or at least occup)in- hi-her altitude> mountainous areas> 0ith a pro?imit) to the mountain tai-a> 0hile the =-ur 3an-ars pre.erred the open steppes o. the 3a<akhstan and Takla #akan + Tarim asin. !orrespon+ din-l)> the =-urs predominatel) remained purel) steppe d0ellers> tied to the ri;ers and the oases o. the deserts> 0hile the =-u<es ad9usted to the .orest+steppe econom)> and had to co+e?ist 0ith the .oot hunters o. the tai-a .orests. In the ne?t chapter o. histor)> 0e encounter the =-ur Huns alread) in a matrimonial union 0ith the =-ur Ai-urs $perhaps centuries o. coe?istence ,et0een Huns and Ai-urs as permanent marria-e partners o. the d)nastic tri,es led to a le;elin- o. the Ai-ur lan-ua-e> ,rin-in- it closer to the =-ur dialect o. the Huns'> carr)in- titles and ethnon)ms e?pressed in the =-ur ;ernacular> Huch9i and !h9uki> and Ich9its)> and 8ich9o> and !h9ilur> and Cuch9ulei> and Kuech9ies> and Kun+!h9un> and in the name o. the 0i.e Kanch9)> Da,tiD> that re.lects the T4rkic/Ai-ur term .or a 0i.e> DattiD. Ai-urs> 0ho ,elon-ed to the Tele tri,es> 0ere o. the =-ur -roup> .or us that at .irst si-ni.) that the Tele tri,es 0ere not necessaril) all =-u<es> and secondl) that o. all the Tele tri,es the =-ur Huns sin-led out the Tele =-ur tri,e o. Ai-urs .or a matrimonial union. The T4rks> and other =-u< tri,es> in the 2nd c. ! remain outside o. the =-ur po0er structure> to the detriment o. the =-ur tri,es. 7hen the !hinese polic) o. corruptin- and di;idintheir most po0er.ul ad;ersar) ,ore .ruit> the =-u< Tele tri,es rose in re;olt> and completed the demise o. the Huns* dominance. 7ith the po0er structure o. the Hun*s state se;erel) in9ured> the Hun tri,es and the tri,es closel) associated 0ith Huns ,ecame .luidi<ed> and .lo0ed to A small part o. the Huns 9oined their ,rethren 0ho kept occup)in- the parts o. the Huns historical domains anne?ed ,) !hina> these Hun tri,es continued their autonomous e?istence under dominion o. !hina> and the) remained a po0er.ul ma-net .or ;arious Hunnic tri,es durin- discord times in the .ollo0in- millennia. A ;er) si-ni.i+ cant part> num,erin- hal. a million population> 9oined their 2)an,i #on-olic ad;ersaries> chan-in- their alle-iance> ,ut -enerall) remainin- intact in their pre;ious areas. Another si-ni.icant part their northern Tele .oes> and esta,lished a ne0 domain in the 0estern #iddle Asia> e?tendin- .rom the /.!aucasus to alkhash. The initial Gate AntiBue Huns* domains included the tri,es o. ul-ars> 2u;ars $2a;ars'> E<-ils> and 3an-ars. 7ith time the no0 7estern Hun con.ederation included Alans> A-ath)rs> 2c)thians> 2armatians> /."ontic T4rks> European Huns> Ases> a part o. the :ermanic tri,es> and A-rian #a-)ars. i part o. the altic tri,es 0as destined to ,ecome 2la;ic tri,es> .rom the Turkic Os4ln4O + OspeakO. 7hen applied to the name o. the 2la;ic peoples> the term sho0s that in the ,e-innin- it 0as

e?oethnon)m .or those alts $and pro,a,l) not onl) alts' 0ho 0ere alto+Turkic ,ilin-ual> and su,se+ Buentl) it ,ecame their o0n non+di..erentiated ethnon)m> 0hich coe?isted 0ith the prior ethnon)ms> and 0hich su,seBuentl) di;ided a-ain into separate historical and ne0 ethnon)ms $s4ln4 o Dslo;oD Q D0ord> speakD o 2la;> 2lo;ak> 2lo;ene> etc.'. The Asian T4rks> 0ho 0ere a separate ,ranch o. the Eastern Huns> ,ecame prominent mem,ers o. the 2)an,i con.ederation> 155+235 A&. The T4rks* kin.olks> Ta,-aches $!h. To,a'> ,ecame a rulintri,e in the 2)an,i con.ederation. In 2(5 the T4rks e;acuated .rom =tuken and =rdos to Hesi> and in %(5 the) e;acuated .rom the Hesi to the Altai mountains. &urin- the dominance o. the 8u9an Eastern Hun 3a-anate> %(0+5%5> the Asian T4rks and other =-u< tri,es 0ere in;oluntar) mem,ers o. the 8u9an 3a-a+ nate. In 552> the Asian T4rks replaced 8u9an Huns .rom the dominatin- position> and took o;er the leader+ ship o. the 3a-anate> no0 kno0n as the T4rkic 3a-anate> and Buickl) e?panded its control o;er the 0hole o. the !entral and #iddle Asia> a,sor,in- the !aucasian Huns and /."ontic ul-ars. Thus the T4rk*s Dseparate ,ranchD o. the Huns restored the Hun*s state o. #ode> and e;en e?tended its ,ounda+ ries. Gin-uisticall)> the tri,es o. the T4rks ,elon-ed to the =-u< .amil) o. the T4rkic lin-uistic tree> 0hich 0as directl) documented in the epitaphs 0ritten in the 2o-dian and T4rkic runi.orm scripts.

Illustration 1: Huns 1000 !

Illustration 2: Huns 210 !

Illustration 3: "omponius #ela $ca. %0 A&'

Illustration %: "tolem)*s Huns+E.Europian tri,es scheme

Illustration 5: HunsAt the ,e-innin- o. /e0 Era

Illustration (: 2)an,i 3a-anate 155+325 A&

Illustration 1: E.T4rks* ana,asis 2(5 5 %(5 A&

Illustration 6: 7est Huns 5th c. A&

Illustration 9: 8u9ans+3ushans+Hephtalitesca A& 500

Illustration 10: 3ushan (th c. A&

Illustration 11: :okt4rk :umile; ethnical lines (th c. A&

Illustration 12: 7. :okt4rk 3a-anate 1th c. A&

Illustration 13: 3ha<aria &omain 10th c. A&

=ther re.erences /. ichurin Hunnu> =ihors> etc p.Taskin Eastern Huns 3 c. ! + 2 c. A& p.Taskin Eastern Huns 3 c. A& + 5 c. A& p.Taskin 3i)an Huns 3 c. A& + 5 c. A& Ku.Lue; Ethnic Histor) o. Asuns Ku.Lue; Earl) T4rks: Essa)s o. histor) Ku.Lue; The 2tron-est Tri,e + E<-il Ku.Lue; Tam-as o. ;assal "rincedoms Ku.Lue; Ancient T4rkic social terms !ontents Huns &atelines Alan Dateline Avar Dateline Besenyo Dateline Bulgar Dateline Huns Dateline Karluk Dateline Khazar Dateline Kimak Dateline Kipchak Dateline Kyrgyz Dateline Sabir Dateline Seyanto Dateline

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful