lecture 9

Topics: The structure of science and common sense The speed of light Time dilation The twin paradox The Doppler effect The twin paradox and inertial frames The structure of science and common sense

from www.raremaps.com

The beautiful edifice of Newtonian mechanics, which we have seen a bit of in the last few weeks, provides a wonderful precise mathematical description of most of the things we see in our everyday world. It is obviously right. But it is also wrong. We have discussed qualitatively the underlying quantum mechanical reality from which Newton’s mechanics emerges as an approximation. In the next few weeks, we will discuss in quantitative detail the bizarre things that go wrong with Newton’s picture at large velocities. What is going on here? Newtonian mechanics beautifully captures the mathematical essence of what we know about the world we have grown 1

We do this by keeping ourselves firmly grounded in what we understand. it is perfectly in accord with our common sense understanding of the world. on our everyday scale. Once we get used to the mathematical language. We have feeling in our bones what happens for accelerations not much different than g . We work our way out from what we know into the unknown. This is a theme that we will return to several times. You have spent all your life moving at speeds very very tiny compared to the speed of light.the space of parameters that describe physical phenomena. And atoms. The meter is then defined as the distance 2 . It is that strange. We expand our knowledge in much the same way that ancient explorers improved their maps of the known world. but at the same time recognizing the limitations of our knowledge. But if we go far outside this familiar range of parameters. The first thing to say is that there is no reason why our sense should have anything at all to do with what happens at extreme conditions. We have some direct intuition about things that are about our size – and maybe a few powers of ten bigger and smaller. but physically slow. Try to bear that in mind when it seems that what we are doing doesn’t make any sense. The second is now defined in terms of a particular oscillation of an atom in an atomic clock. you are still not going to really understand it or believe it. and you think that you have internalized it. It is that you are slow! Not mentally slow. pushing farther and farther in different directions away from the range of phenomena that we see in the everyday world. How can it be wrong? But it is wrong. If anything. We feel in our bones that it is right. we are going to discuss one of these directions — the realm of the very fast.792. It is useful to think of science as a map of a peculiar space .458 m/s. The speed of light The speed of light is exactly 299. Even if you have heard this before. The wonderful thing about the discipline of modern science is that we can say sensible things about phenomena even when our sense doesn’t work. far from what we are used to in everyday life.up it. We should be prepared for surprises. before Newtonian kinematics starts to break down. which exhibit quantum behavior in all its glory. What “exactly” means in this case is just what it says. In the next few weeks. but standard). It doesn’t make any sense. When it is strange. as we will see. you will not even have any sense of what it would mean to understand it or believe it. In fact. it would be rather surprising if our common sense worked very well. The reason that you don’t understand is very simple. the International System of Units. We have to go to really enormous velocities. what should surprise us is that our common sense works as far as it does. so nothing in your experience has prepared you for the phenomena that happen all the time at large speeds (which we call “relativistic” speeds — a rather bizarre grammatical construction if you think about it. it makes sense to use it to define our unit of length (the meter) in terms of our unit of time (the second). It is no longer necessary to keep a “standard” 1 meter bar in a vault someplace. I am going to tell you today that it is wrong and what is right and you will not understand me or believe. are very small. This is what is done in SI. don’t be surprised. Because the speed of light. is built into the structure of space and time. and velocities like those we are used to.

. that is not the way the world works... and routinely see things (small things like electrons. ..... Nevertheless... This bizarre fact is built into the way the world works...458 m/s is fast..........1 Things get more complicated in material like glass because the interactions of the light with the material can slow the light down. as we will see much later.... is unleashed when we combine it with another. I am running towards a light-bulb at speed v carrying a light-speed meter... Now if you think that you understand this. (1) This is absolutely crazy........ The principle of relativity says simply that all uniform motion is relative.... there is a well-defined meaning to the notion of the speed in light in vacuum........... Now 299. Acceleration is accompanied by forces that we The notion of “empty space” is itself rather problematic. you obviously have not been listening carefully enough.... but standing still...... However.. But it is certainly not infinitely fast. 1 3 ... for example... I get the same value that you would get measuring the same light beam in about the same place at about the same time.. And when we include the effects of quantum mechanics... ......792.......792.......... ....... If... . With modern electronics... period! It is not that something goes wrong with my light-speed meter... we routinely measure the speed of light...... But when I do the measurement..... but things nevertheless) moving at speeds very close to the speed of light... The full power of this remarkable fact.. Note that we can tell if our motion is not uniform... c=299792458 v → c=299792458 ← v c=299792458 . ...... we will formalize this idea with the notion of an inertial frame of reference...... Its role as a cosmic speed limit survives all this extra complication... In fact.............. because this doesn’t make any sense at all.. But the surprising thing about light in a vacuum is that the speed of light that we measure doesn’t depend on the velocity of the object that produced the light. it is not science fiction.. we can measure very short times........ There is no absolute sense in which I can say I am moving............ The point I am trying to make here is that while motion at close to the speed of light is far beyond our everyday experience..... empty space begins to look anything but empty.... That is what common sense would say.. all of you sitting at rest see the light from the bulb approaching me at a speed v + c... and it doesn’t depend on the velocity of the measuring apparatus.... . .... I should say that when I talk about the speed of light........ I always mean the speed of light “in vacuum” — that is in empty space.. so it is not impossible to see the effect of the finite speed of light even over fairly short distances..... I get the same value for the speed of light that I would get if I were standing still. In fact... ........... There is no preferred notion of standing still... It is a heck of a lot faster than we can actually move ourselves. a device to measure the speed of light.. In a moment... it is true...... .. ........ space is only completely empty at absolute zero.. Nevertheless. The way the world works is that the speed of light in vacuum is constant... much more reasonable fact about the way the world works — the principle of relativity. .. .... I should register a larger speed on my light-speed meter.. The same thing happens if I am running away from the light source.. Surely if I am moving towards the light beam... the constancy of the speed of light..458th of a second.......... Even classically....... ........that light travels in 1/299.

It is an attempt to formalize the notion that motion is relative in an operational way. We all know this very well from travel in vehicles. that it remains true at relativistic speeds. you have to synchronize your clocks! This is where the idea of an inertial frame comes in. Time dilation Let’s start with one of the strangest and most trivial of the consequences of relativity — time dilation. Now let’s see some of the consequences of putting these two ideas about the world together. But first. an inertial frame must not be accelerating. which is easy to check because you can just demand that Newton’s laws hold for small velocities — free particles travel in straight lines. cars. That the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames. that sort of thing. the speed of light does not seem to be a complicated concept. of course. is one that already plays an important role in non-relativistic mechanics. we must carefully describe what velocity means by describing precisely what we need to measure it. these two principles are amazingly powerful. and B. The phenomena of time dilation can be stated precisely as follows. trains.2 In addition. You measure it in the obvious way with clocks and meter sticks. is something that feel in our bones for the slow motions that we are used to. On the surface. As you will see in more detail in the notes. So we have two fundamental principles. But uniform motion is not detectable. for example by requiring that some signal that originates midway between each pair of clocks arrives at the two clocks at the same time. An inertial frame is a real or imaginary collection of clocks that are fixed with respect to one another and synchronized. Observations done on a single clock moving with speed v with respect to a number of clocks fixed in an inertial frame show the ticking of the moving clock slowed down by a factor of 1 − v 2 /c2 . They will revolutionize our picture of space and time. This. as long as the signal travels at the same speed in both directions! 2 4 . and whatnot. A. so long as everything else we need is moving along with us. To do this. Inertial frames The idea of an inertial frame of reference or just “inertial frame” for short. with Einstein. The standard way of deriving this result is to consider an idealized clock made out of two parallel mirrors and a pulse It doesn’t matter for this purpose whether we are using a light signal or the Pony Express. We are going to assume. by dividing the distance traveled by the time taken.can feel in our bones. That one of the laws of physics is that the velocity of light is a constant — with the same value in all inertial frames. planes.

. . Then Pythagoras tells us that (γL)2 = (γLv/c)2 + L2 (4) which implies γ= 1 1 − v 2 /c2 (5) So time is no longer sacred. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . The light pulse moves vertically a distance L (because the tracks are a distance L apart) and horizontally a distance v · γL/c (just the velocity of the light clock multiplied by the time). . . . . . . . . Now we look at the geometry of the motion. . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . from the point of view of the many clocks in the inertial frame. . . . . the ticks of the light clock take longer when it is moving. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . light . . . . . . . . . . . Then we can compute γ as follows. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . (2) mirror . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. Call the factor by which the ticks are longer γ . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . mirror A light-clock at rest If the distance between the mirrors is L. . . . .. . . . . . defined as the time for the pulse to get from one mirror to the other. . And this can’t just be a special property of light clocks. . . . . . . pulse . . ... . . and got a different result. . . .. . . then we would be 5 . . . . . . . . c. .. Thus if light always travels at the same velocity.. . . .. . .. . .. . . the time for each tick of the clock. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . ... . And because light travels at the same speed. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . because if we used some other kind of clock to measure the time. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . .because L/c is the time for a tick in the rest frame).. . . . . the light pulse has to go farther when the single light clock is moving... . . . . . . . . . .. . .. Now suppose that the two mirrors of this light clock are mounted on parallel tracks a distance L apart and the two mirrors moved down the tracks with velocity v . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. Each vertical transit of the light from one mirror to the other in the moving frame takes time γL/c (just from the definition of γ . .. . . . . mirror . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . Now the system looks to observers in the fixed frame as shown below . .. . . . . . . . is L/c. . .. . . .. . . the length of the path from one mirror to the next is therefore γL/c. . . . ... . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. L . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . (3) mirror A light-clock in motion Obviously. ... . .. .. .of light bouncing back and forth between them: . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. ..

it is probably the easiest of the relativity principles to remember and use. this factor γ is going to reappear all the time.physicscentral. That seems like a lot to ask of tiny particles that are supposed to be elementary and have no internal structure. Every kind of clock must tick out seconds at the same rate in all inertial frames. We find that the ratio of the lifetimes is γ . this is just as good. and then measure the lifetime of the same TYPE of particle in a moving frame. at this point. or to be able to reproduce the light-clock argument in real time so you can get it whenever you need it. In fact. and when they are sitting still and evolving in time. but enormous accuracy is required to make GPS work and the relativistic effects must be properly included. and just remember that γ > 1. The relativistic corrections are small. But we are relying on another fact — all particles of a particular kind are exactly the same. See for example http://www. We see this all the time in particle experiments. that once you define what you are talking about carefully.able to distinguish between the moving frame and the frame in which the light clock is fixed. both special and general relativistic effects are very important in one very practical application — the Global Positioning System which is based on a system of atomic clocks aboard satelites. (6) If you keep this in mind. because the satellites are traveling at “only” about 4000 m/s. It is quite easy with modern electronics and atomic clocks to see relativistic effects like time dilation. you think. but that we have just confused the issue with a bizarre definition of measurement. But we can quite easily measure the lifetime of a particle at rest. Another important thing about time dilation is that although it is strange. Incidentally. Even our experiment on decays of elementary particles might be just a matter of a bad definition of what we mean by the ticking of their internal clocks. Think again! Perhaps the simplest way of making clear that 6 . that there is some other way of constructing our light-speed meters so that the speed of light is not constant and the bizarre features of relativity go away. with inertial frames. But this violates the principle that all frames are equivalent. We can actually see these internal clocks ticking (at least in an average sense) by watching the particles decay.html. The observed lifetime of unstable particles is a tangible measure of how fast these internal clocks are ticking.com/writers/writers-00-2. But the fact is that quantum mechanics provides us with internal clocks for many elementary particles because they are unstable. that there isn’t anything particularly strange about motion at relativistic speeds. Perhaps. you will always be able to reconstruct the right formula. Even more dramatic examples of time dilation occur all the time with elementary particles. We never actually measure the decay rate of the same decaying particle in two different frames. they have a constant probability per unit time of decaying into other lighter particles. so it pays to actually either memorize it. Since all particles of a particular type are identical. The thing to remember is The single clock measures the shorter time. Use time dilation whenever you can to solve problems! The twin paradox Now you may very well be thinking.

. .. . . .. . .. . . .. . ... . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . So now let us look at two successive crests of the wave as the train moves towards us — illustrated below: sound meter sound meter ... . . . . . . . When the traveling twin returns. . in the change in sound of a train whistle when the train goes by. . The difference can be measured by atomic clocks. . .. is the product of the frequency and the wavelength: Vs (m/s) = λ0 (m/cycle) · ν0 (cycles/s) (7) The inverse of the frequency is the period of the sound wave. . . . have frequency ν0 .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. for example. . . . . . . . . . . .. while the other twin remains at home. ... . . . . . . .. . .. . ... . . ... . .. . . . .. . or any other wave when we are moving at nonrelativistic speeds. . . . His biological clock is no different from any other clock. . The speed of sound. . .. . ..something totally bizarre is going on is to discuss the twin paradox. . the crests are closer together than they would be if the train were standing still. . . . .. . . . Vs ... . . . . .. . . . . 0 . . ... . . . .. .. . And a number of very accurate experiments have been done showing exactly this effect with the internal clocks of unstable elementary particles. . . . .. | . .. when the train is at rest. . . and wavelength λ0 . .. . 0 . . because his clocks have been ticking slowly. . The twin paradox is so peculiar that I want to work out an example of how it looks to the two twins who are aging differently. . Relativity has slowed down the aging process. .. . . . . To do this.. . . . I don’t know what is. . .. . he is younger than his twin. . .. . . it is useful to first understand the relativistic Doppler effect. . . . . . . .. . .. . .. Vs λ0 = (9) ν0 7 . but the difference is sufficiently small at the speeds of mere orbital motion that the don’t see a huge difference in biological clock (which aren’t very accurate). . . . . Again. | train V −v ν v ν Because the train is moving forward as it emits the wave. . . . . . . The distance between crests for the train at rest is just the wavelength. . since the same thing happens for sound or any other wave. s . .. . . . . . Suppose that a train is moving towards me at speed v and its whistle emits sound waves which. . . . s .. t=0 t = 1/ν0 (8) V ν . .. . .. . . . ... . . train . . . . . . . . . . this experiment has not been done conclusively with people. . ... . . . ... The Doppler effect While the speed of a light beam does not change when we go from one inertial frame to another. . . This is not surprising. . . .. which is the time between successive crests of the wave. . This is a classic thought experiment in which one twin takes a trip on a rocket moving at relativistic speeds. . . First. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . | . ... . . . . . ... If this is not strange. . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . .. let me remind you how the Doppler effect goes for sound. . . .. .. . It is called the Doppler effect and shows up. . . . . .. .. . . . ... . . .. . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . its frequency does change. ... Astronauts in MIR or the space shuttle do age less rapidly than the rest of us. . . . . . . .. .. .

. . . the time between the emission of successive crests of the wave is longer than 1/ν0 by the ubiquitous factor of γ . . 0 . . . . . . .. rocket . . . which is the time between successive crests of the wave. . . . . . ... . ... . . but replace the train with a rocket moving at relativistic speed.. . | rocket γv ν γ (c−v ) ν Because the rocket is moving forward as it emits the wave. . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 0 .. . ... ... ..... . and the train whistle has a higher pitch when it is moving towards us. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .... .. . . ... . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . ... . . . .. .. . Now suppose we do a similar thing. . c λ0 = (14) ν0 The distance between crests for the moving rocket is λv = γ (c − v ) ν0 (15) Thus the wavelength of the light as recorded at the light meter is reduced by the relativistic Doppler factor 1 γ (c − v ) 1 − v/c = (1 − v/c) = (16) c 1 + v/c 1 − v 2 /c2 8 . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . | ... . . . . .. . . If the train is moving away. . . .. . .. .. . . . The distance between crests for the rocket at rest is just the wavelength... . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . ... the crests are closer together than they would be if the rocket were standing still. . almost everything is the same. .. . . . .. . .. . The speed of light is the product of the frequency and the wavelength: c (m/s) = λ0 (m/cycle) · ν0 (cycles/s) (12) The inverse of the frequency is the period of the light wave. light meter . . because the moving clock ticks more slowly. the argument is exactly the same — we just have to replace v → −v in (11). . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. t=0 t = γ/ν0 (13) . . . . . . . . .. .. .The distance between crests for the moving train is λv = Vs − v ν0 (10) Thus the wavelength of the sound as recorded at the sound meter is reduced by the nonrelativistic Doppler factor Vs − v (11) Vs Because (7) must be satisfied. ... . . .. . . except that because of time dilation. . . . . . .. and replace sound with light..... ..... In the diagram. . . . | . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. . .. . ... . .. . . ... . 0 . . . . . Thus the picture looks like light meter γc ν . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . the frequency is increased by the inverse of (11). . . . . . . . .. . . .. ... . ..

There is one very important distinction to note about the relativistic Doppler effect versus the nonrelativistic version. We will assume the typical form of the twin paradox that we discussed above. Here are a series of snapshots showing the important times during the trip. In the relativistic version. but stays in constant communication with twin 2 behind on earth using radio waves. turns around (quickly) and sends a turn-around signal to twin 2. Imagine that twin 1 takes a trip to planet X. This is not true for the nonrelativistic Doppler effect because the air in which sound moves defines a special frame. ← v1 t = L/v 2 X The turn-around signal reaches twin 2 at t = tX = L/v + L/c ←v1 t = tX 2 9 X . Again. the argument is exactly the same — we just have to replace v → −v everywhere. quickly turns around. Twin 1 leaves twin 2 at t = 0 traveling at constant v – staying in constant radio communication 1v→ t=0 2 X Twin 1 arrives at planet X at t = L/v . if the rocket is moving away. The twin paradox and inertial frames We can now use the Doppler effect to understand time dilation and the twin paradox. or some other electromagnetic waves that have fixed frequency in twin 1’s frame (the rocket frame). This is called blue-shift because raising frequency in the optical spectrum is a shift towards the blue. because of the principle of relativity. it doesn’t matter whether the rocket is approaching the observer at speed v or the observer is approaching the rocket at speed v . at distance L from earth. 1 + v/c 1 − v/c (17) and the light has higher frequency when the rocket is moving towards us. where twin 1 goes out to planet X at speed v . by keeping track of every tick of the moving clock. It can’t. the frequency is increased by the inverse of (16).Because (12) must be satisfied. This is called red-shift because lowering frequency in the optical spectrum is a shift towards the red. and returns at the same speed. indicating that he has reached the planet.

This is also the twin paradox. so twin 2 received the same number of ticks in the red-shifted signal from the trip out as in the blue-shifted signal from the trip back. But twin 2 receives red shifted photons for a time tX = L/v + L/c and blue shifted for 2L/v − tX = L/v − L/c. from twin 1’s point of view. Why is it that twin 1 is younger at the end. twin 2 (along with the rest of the earth) has moved away at speed v and then come back at the same speed. First note that the two terms in (22) are equal. Because twin 1 has sent out fewer ticks.Twin 1 and twin 2 are reunited at t = 2L/v 1 t = 2L/v 2 X The radio transmitter is a clock – number of ticks (cycles) is t ν where ν is frequency of transmitter. twin 1 watches twin 2 and 10 . rather than twin 2? Let’s look at the trip from twin 1’s point of view. But now. He is younger than twin 2 when he returns. he has also aged less. because twin 1 sent the same number of ticks on the way to planet X as on the way back. we would have expected T = T = 2L v (21) Thus twin 2 “sees” rocket clocks ticking more slowly by a factor of 1 − v 2 /c2 = 1/γ (22) This is time dilation. Therefore. At t = 0. why isn’t the situation symmetrical? After all. Thus the number of ticks sent by twin 1 is T ν . you say. Now things look a bit different. assuming that it is twin 2 who is sending out radio signals the whole time. the number of cycles received by the twin 2 is ν 1 − v/c 1 + v/c 1 − v/c L 1 + v/c L L + +ν v c 1 + v/c +ν v 1 + v/c 1 − v/c L L − v c 1 − v/c v (19) (20) (18) =ν 1 + v/c L 1 − v/c =ν Thus 2L 1 − v 2 /c2 = ν T v 2L 1 − v 2 /c2 v Nonrelativistically. The moving clock ticks more slowly as seen by the clock at rest. where T is the total time he aged on the trip. This had to be the case. Here is the chronology. There are a couple of other things to notice about (22).

Here is another way of saying what the difference is. The number of cycles that twin 1 receives is     T  1 − v/c ν + 2 1 + v/c 1 + v/c  T  = ν 1 − v/c 2  1 − v/c 1 + v/c 1 − v/c + 1 − v/c  1 + v/c 1 − v/c 1 + v/c  1 + v/c (23) (24) T  1 − v/c ν + 2 1 − v 2 /c2 which using (20) is 1 + v/c  1 = Tν 1 − v 2 /c2 1 − v 2 /c2 2L ν (25) v which is exactly what we expected. Similarly. But from twin 2’s point of view. turns around (quickly) and starts to recede again. the switch from red-shift to blue-shift occurs the moment he turns around. He decelerates and accelerates again in the opposite direction. This makes sense. is at rest in a single inertial frame the whole time. He blasts off and accelerates.the earth recede at constant v . He is in one frame on the way out. He has to wait until the turn-around signal arrives to see the shift from red-shift to blue-shift. he doesn’t just watch planet X turn around. Twin 2. He feels these accelerations in his bones! From twin 1’s point of view. Twin 1 is not. twin 1 receives blue-shifted signals until earth reappears and he is reunited with twin 2. Twin 1 receives radio signals from twin 2 that are red-shifted until planet X appears. It should be clear that I have not quite described this process the way twin 1 experiences it. 1 t=0 ←v2 X Planet X reaches twin 1 at t = T /2. so twin 1 has to be a whiz at relativity to calculate its position. Planet X is shown as dashed in the figure because it is not in the same inertial frame as twin 1’s ship. nothing special happens when twin 1 reaches the planet. and in a 11 . remaining on earth. 1 2 t = T /2 Xv → Twin 1 and twin 2 are reunited at t = T 1 t=T 2 X Now we can check that the two pictures are consistent. From this point on. He doesn’t just watch earth receding at t = 0. I hope it is clear from this discussion what the asymmetry is. He knows that he has turned around.

12 .different frame on the way back. Relativity may be strange. It is the fact that twin 1 must switch from one inertial frame to the other that makes his experience different. but it is consistent.