Model of a heat meter in a district heating substation under dynamic load

Yassin Jomni∗ , Jan van Deventer† , Jerker Delsing‡
∗†‡

EISLAB, CSEE, Lule˚ a University of Technology, Lule˚ a, Sweden, {yassin∗ ,deventer† ,Jerker.Delsing‡ }@sm.luth.se

Abstract Measurement errors generated by heat meters cause a substantial revenue loss in the district heating industry. The focus of previous works has mainly been treating improvements of heat energy measurement at steady state conditions. We have investigated how dynamic events affect the energy measurements. A simulation model comprised of a heat meter and a district heating substation has been developed. The model was implemented with the software package Simulink of MathWorks. This simulation model is used to show the impact of a dynamic load on the heat energy measurement. We see that the dynamic tap water load imposed on the system has an impact on the accuracy of the heat meter, especially when the flow increases rapidly from a low value to a higher value. The mean heat measurement error is approximatively 14% of the real heat energy transfered.

1

Introduction

District heating is a technology used to deliver heat energy from a central production facility to city districts or whole cities through a distribution network. This technology was introduced in the USA around 1870-80 [2]. Water is commonly used as an energy carrier in such networks. The transfer of heat energy between the district heating network and a building occurs in a district heating substation through heat exchangers. It is at these substations that heat meters are located. The energy consumption can be divided into space heating and tap water usage. The tap water consumption varies as users consume hot water when they, for example, take a hot shower, wash hands etc. A typical heat meter consists of a set of two resistance temperature sensors, usually Pt500 sensors, a volume-flow meter and an integrating unit, which estimates the energy consumed by the household [2]. The aim of this work has been to create a computer model of a commonly used heat meter as part of a Simulink model of a district heating substation and a household [5], taking in account the dynamics of the system. The impact of the domestic hot water dynamic load on heat metering was then investigated using this model.

1

and Ts Tr k (Tr . temperature difference ∆Ti and the heat coefficient ki (Tri . The temperature sensors measure the supply and return temperatures in the primary circuit. The district heating circuit is refered to as the primary circuit while the household circuits are the secondary circuits. The obtained value is then added to the one computed in the previous iteration to get the total heat energy consumed according to equation (6) . also separates their circuits. the integration unit measures the return and supply temperatures and the integration time [2]. The heat energy consumed by the household Q [J] during a period of time ∆t is given by the following continuous time integral [2] t2 t2 Q= t1 mc ˙ p (Tr . 2 . Ts ) m ˙ V ρ(Tr ) cp (Tr .2 Heat metering theory The district heating substation. Ts )∆T dt = t1 V k (Tr . The heat meter estimates how much energy was transfered from the primary circuit to the secondary circuits. m ˙ V = . they use the following discrete approximation of equation (1) to compute the heat energy consumed by the household N Q= i=0 Vi ki ∆Ti ∆ti . Heat meters do not compute continuous events. It is commonly comprised of a volume-flow meter. The flow meter measures the flow rate of the primary circuit. which connects the district heating network and house. The time between two consecultive pulses is often called the integration time and is flow dependent. The average flow rate during the integration time Vi . The flow meter emits a pulse when a certain volume of water has passed through it. (6) where ∆ti is the time elapsed between two consecutive measurements. ρ ∆t = t2 − t1 . (1) where k (Tr . Ts ) = = = = = = = the the the the the the the measured supply temperature measured return temperature heat coefficient mass-flow rate volume-flow rate fluid density at Tr average specific heat capacity at Tr and Ts (2) (3) (4) (5) [o C ] [o C ] [J/o Cm3 ] [kg/s] [m3 /s] [kg/m3 ] [J/o Ckg ]. Tsi ) are then computed by the heat integrator unit using equations (2) to (4) and multiplied to get the value of the heat energy consumed for each iteration i. two resistance temperature sensors and a computing unit. Ts ) = ρ(Tr )cp (Tr . Ts )∆T dt. When a pulse is emitted. Ts ). ∆T = Ts − Tr .

Temp INTEGRATING UNIT Flowmeter pulses Flow Volume 1 Measured flow 2 Measured Tr 3 Measured heat FLOWMETER Temp sensor Supply Hot Water Primary circuit Figure 1: Simulink model of the heat meter The inputs of the heat meter model. is multiple of int. are the real supply and return temperatures Trs and Trr and the real flow of the primary circuit which are simulated by the district heating substation model. a period of 150 s and an amplitude of 0. Meas. 1 Flow 1 s Integrator Water volume 2 The volume of water to wait for (intg. Tr 2 Real Trr Real Temp. The outside temperature is modeled by a sine wave where the daily temperature fluctuations are also modeled in the same manner. The heat meter model’s outputs. The simulated duration is 1 hour. Rectangular tap water pulses with a duration of 50 s. 1 Real flow Real Flow. Flow Error in flowmeter Return Hot Water Primary circuit Product Heat Real Measured Tr Ts Meas.Meas.3 Method The heat meter model presented in this paper is used as part of a larger Simulink model of a district heating substation [5] having the outside environment temperature and the domestic hot water consumption as inputs. are the measured return temperatures Tr .8 l/s were used in this simulation to simulate the dynamics of the system. the measured flow of the primary circuit and the measured heat energy consumed by the household. Vol) rem If Vol. Temp Flowmeter Pulses Measured heat energy Volume Temp sensor Return Hot Water Primary circuit 3 Real Trs Real Temp. shown in figure (1). vol (reminder) If reminder small enough set to 0 1 Flowmeter pulses 2 Volume Figure 2: Simulink model of a volume-flow meter Each component of the heat meter have been modeled separately with its 3 . over the simulated period. flow Meas. Nordic winter temperatures (−13o C ≤ T ≤ −3o C ) have been modeled in this simulation.Meas.

measurement 1 Heat Real 1 z Unit Delay INTEGRATOR (real=magenta) 2 3 Measured heat energy 1 z Product 3 Ts Unit Delay1 2 f(u) Fcn INTEGRATOR: Heat error (%) Figure 3: Simulink model of an integrating unit 4 Results and discussion We show in figure (4) the error in heat energy estimation. τs + 1 where τ is the time constant. Each sensor in a district heating substation has an associated uncertainty at a given confidence level whether they are used for control or for the measurement of the transferred heat. We have used τ = 2 in this simulation. A standard error analysis is very useful to 4 . The response time due to material coatings and encapsulation around resistance temperature sensors has been modeled using the following first order transfer function [1] G(s) = 1 . shown in figures (2) and (3) respectively. Random uncertainties have been modeled by adding a Gaussian distribution with mean 0 and variance 1 [3].associated systematic and random uncertainties. The volume-flow meter and the integrating unit. Tr Read Tr Switch 1 Meas. The mean measurement error is approximately 14% of the real heat energy transfered estimated using equation (1). Tr Measure the integration time and triggers temp. have been modeled as explained in section 2. 4 Flowmeter Pulses 5 Volume Time pulse time Clock Measures the time of each pulse 2 Measured Tr Transport Delay Time Diff. flow 2 Meas. Read time diff Div Meas.

120 110 100 90 Heat measurement error (%) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Time (Seconds) 2500 3000 3500 Figure 4: The error in heat measurement assess the contribution of the uncertainty of each error as it propagates to the transferred heat measurement. One of the major problems is that the volume-flow meter only enables us to estimate an average flow rate under the integration 5 . we combine the sensor uncertainties and the dynamics of the systems to illustrate that the total error is considerable. This problem is not noticeable at night and in summer since the heat consumption is then quasiconstant and do not fluctuate drastically during the integration time. when computing the heat transfer equation (6). This is far from reality since the return temperature. which affects the response time needed before the sensor can accurately measure the water temperature. but also the supply temperature to a lesser extent. etc. One possible error source in the temperature sensors is the time constant τ . One of the many problems the heat integrator faces. like the choice of encapsulation materials. If the integration time is shorter than the response time of the sensor accuracy problems in temperature measurements will occur. Other sources of error also need to be taken in account. But this only considers set and static conditions [4]. Considering dynamic effects of the heat exchanger and sensors explains the source of dynamic errors. fluctuates during the integration time. In this paper. is that the supply and return temperatures are assumed to be constant by the heat integrator during the integration time.. but once the heat consumption is dynamic the heat integrator fails to give us an accurate value of the consumed heat energy since the return and supply temperatures fluctuate considerably under the integration time. The measurement error of the flow meter is more difficult to predict since it depends on many factors.

Moczar G. Other error sources need also to be taken in account like the fact that the pipes do expand when hot water flows through them. Fj¨ arrv¨ arme Teori. Coleman. Pearson Education Ltd. Persson. 3rd edition. Studentlitteratur. Bentley. John Wiley & Sons. We conclude that heatmeters using volume-flow meters have bad accuracy when exposed to a dynamic heat energy consumption especially when the flow rate in the primary circuit is low. Tappvarmvatten reglering i fj¨ arrv¨ armecentraler f¨ or sm˚ ahus. [3] W. Distributed measurement system for heat metering and control.. A balance between heat measurement accuracy and power consumption is to be taken in account since these devices are often powered by batteries. The real flow rate may drastically vary during the integration time without being detected by the integrating unit. 1995. An other problem is the length of the integration time. [2] S. Sweden. 221 00. Werner.. If it is too short then the flow measurement error will drastically increase. Licentiate thesis. Issue 4:Pages 691–694. Instrumentation and measurement. Csubak T. 6 . 1998. INC. [4] Varaday P. teknik och funktion. IEEE transactions. References [1] John P. second edition. Lund Institute of Technology. October 2002. [5] T. Glenn Steele Hugh W. Principles of Measurement Systems. 51. Aug 2002. New energy metering methods are to be proposed if one wants more accurate energy measurements. 1993. Frederiksen and S. This could affect the dimensioning of our system and give us errors.time. Box 118. Vol. Dept. of Heat and Power Engineering. Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engeneers. Lund.