15 views

Uploaded by Ammar A. Ali

save

You are on page 1of 5

Comparative Study of Design of Steel Structural Elements by using IS 800:2007, AISC 13th Edition and BS: 5950, 1:2000

Amruta G. Whatte, S.S. Jamkar

Abstract- The task of the structural engineer is to design a structure which satisfies the needs of the client and the user. Specifically the structure should be safe, economical to build and maintain, and aesthetically pleasing. By considering the above needs of user this study gives the comparative design of structural element by using three different International Design Codes.Structural Elements such as tension member, compression member, flexural member, beam column, gusseted base, and beam column connection are designed for this comparative study. Same data is considered for the design of particular element and that element is designed by using Indian Standard (IS 800:2007), American Standard (AISC 13th Edition) and British Standard (BS 5950, 1:2000). The design methodology used in this study is same for all the codes but there are some differences in the constants or parameters depending on the code used. Finally the results are evaluated and compared in the tabular format. Keywords–IS 800:2007, AISC 13th edition, BS 5950 1:2000, LRFD, and ASD.

The condition or the state at which structure becomes unsafe is called the limit state and the philosophy based on this concept is called limit state philosophy of design.This method is more general in comparison to the working stress method. Several independent factors are used in the limit state design, each of which plays a particular role to ensure the reliability of the structure and the guarantee against the occurrence of a limit state 1.3 Design Codes Structural design is a major activity of the profession of structural engineering. The designers can call on their creative spirit to design an infinite scope of outcomes but there are some severe restrictions on this freedom, namely economics and the demands posted by the requirements of the structural design standards, sometimes called codes or design specifications. A standard code serves as a reference document with important guidance. The contents of the standard code generally cover details of design. These details include the basis and concept of design, specifications to be followed, design methods, safety factors, loading values and etc. In present days, many countries have published their own standard codes. These codes were a product of constant research and development, and past experiences of experts at respective fields. Meanwhile, countries or nations that do not publish their own standard codes will adopt a set of readily available code as the national reference. Some of them are Indian standard, American standard, British standard, Euro standard, Japan code, Canadian standard etc. 1.4 Objective This study aimed to design all structural Steel elements as per IS 800:2007, AISC 13th manual and BS 5950-1:2000 guidelines and their comparison. II. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT There are various international codes available for the design of steel structures. Developments are still going on to achieve the great economy by using different methods as well as by using different codes of practice. In this chapter various designs are presented using three codes that is IS code, AISC code and BS code with step by step procedure. This study gives the method of design of structural elements by different codes and comparison of results. Here design example of tension member will describes the methodology by IS method, BS method and AISC method. 2.1 Design Example Design a tension member for unequal angle section of length 3 m, load on the member is 225 kN; diameter of bolt is 20mm.

I.

INTRODUCTION

In the present work, the detailed study of Design of structural element by using American Institute of Steel Construction and British Standard has been carried out with the comparison to the results by IS 800:2007 and submitted the comparative study of the same in the form of tables, which highlights the actual economy achieved by different codes of design for different structural sections. The observations made based on this study are very much necessary to the practicing structural engineers.The introduction of the paper should explain the nature of the problem, purpose, and the contribution of the paper. The design of steel elements can be done by two methods: 1.1 Allowable Stress Design (Working Stress Method) Working stress method of design based on the elastic theory in which material is assumed to be stressed well below its elastic limit under the design loads.The method, since relates safety to stress, defines factor of safety as the ratio of ultimate stress or yield stress to allowable or safe stress.This method is a well established method and that the method is simple in application and reliable 1.2 Load and Resistance Factor Design (Limit state Design) The limit state method uses concept of fitness of the structure to perform its function satisfactorily during its service life span.

Manuscript received on August, 2013. Miss. Amruta G. Whatte, (Department of Applied Mechanics, Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, M.S. India. Prof. S.S. Jamkar, (Department of Applied Mechanics, Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, M.S. India

8

shear strength is.5×22×8) = 1448 mm2 Atg = (100-40)8 = 480 mm2 Atn = Atg – (0.40 kN No of bolts can be calculated by knowing the total load applied on the member and the strength of one bolt and here both values are known therefore. Atn = minimum gross and net area in tension from the bolt hole to the toe of the angle. Partial Safety Factor = ϒ mo=1.. Strength against yielding Tdg= = (1336 × 250)/1. Section chosen from steel table is ISA: 100 X 75 X 8 mm.75] Strength against rupture Tdn= Where. Sectional Properties of the same section from the steel table are as follows: Ag = 13. respectively Avn = Avg– (4. page no -30] Therefore. here minimum value is of shear strength. strength due to rupture and strength due to block shear.78 Nominal plain shank area of bolt = Asb = π / 4 ×(20) 314.38 kN > 225kN [ = . assume the thickness of gusset plate is 10 mm. end bolt line. Pg. Shear strength Shear strength of bolt is Vdsb= Where. Therefore. Avg .Ultimate yield strength = fu = 410 Mpa Number of shear planes with threads intercepting the shear plane = nn = 0 Number of shear planes without threads intercepting the shear planes = ns = 0.OK Strength against block shearing IS 800:2007. the tensile strength of designed member should be greater than the load applied on the member.1 /250 = 990 mm2 By using calculated gross area choose section from steel table having area slightly greater than the calculated.1 Design of Tension Member Check for Design Check for the design of tension member is taken as.33] Net area = total gross area – area of hole An = 1336-(22× 8) = 1160 mm2 Tdn= = 304. Vdpb= Kb = 0. α = 0. page no .1.5×22×8) = 392 mm2 = 86..1 Solution by IS Method Yield strength of member = Where. thickness of gusset plate should be known hence. page no -33] As per IS 800 :2007 strength of member due to block shear is calculated by two formulae and smaller one is supposed to be the final strength of member due to block shear.. of bolts = = = 4. No.36 cm2 = 1336 mm2 To calculate the strength of one bolt.15 mm2 Partial Safety Factor for bearing type ϒ mb = 1. table no. No.8 because number of bolts are 5 [IS 800 : 2007. 1) =46.40kN [IS : 800. Yield Stress = Fy= 250 Mpa. perpendicular to the line of force. Pg. End distance (e) = 40 mm and Pitch (P) = 60 mm Therefore.1 [table no-5. from Vdsband Vdpb [Assumed] Strength of one bolt = 46.Avn = minimum gross and net area in shear along bolt line parallel to external force. and the tensile strength nothing but the least value from strength due to yielding. 1:2000 2.75] Strength of one bolt as per Standards is the minimum strength by shear strength or bearing strength of the bolt.84 ~ 5 No. Strength of one bolt[IS : 800.75] Where. therefore Strength of one bolt = min.OK [IS : 800...1 Gross area Ag = 225 X 103 × 1. Pg. Avg = (40+60×4)8 = 2240mm2 Here to calculate the constant Kb the values of end distance and pitch should be known therefore Assume. No. Vdsb= Bearing Strength Bearing strength of bolt is Vdpb= Constant = Kb = min of ( .225 × 103 =Ag × 250 / 1. No.5.25 [IS 800..66 9 .1= 303. AISC 13 th Edition and BS: 5950.Comparative Study of Design of Steel Structural Elements by using IS 800:2007.2.592 kN Tdb1 = 2 As per IS 800 the strength of bolt is the least value from bearing strength or shear strength.63 kN> 225 kN …………. respectively Atg. IS: 800] Fig.

56 kip ….04 ~ 3Nos.2 × 1.2.57 × 5/16 × 58 = 25.6 . = 50. the strength of bolt can be calculated. constant = φ = 0.9 Ag = 50.6× Av × fy Where. Table-5-2. eq no.43 × = 0.75 Bolts ultimate shear stress = Fv = 58 ksi Nominal cross-sectional area of bolt= Ab = π/4 d2 = 0. constant = φ = 0.56 Yield strength = fy = 36 and Constant = φ = 0. Strength of bolt is smaller of shear strength or bearing strength = 16.56= 36×Ag ×0. 2.. Anv = minimum gross and net area in shear along bolt line parallel to external force. J4-5] φRn= φ [ 0.76 in2 ) = 0. Strength against block shear = min. 2.879kN Check for strength Check for the design of tension member is taken as. Strength against yielding φRn= φ × 0. page no-5-16] [AISC.49 × 0. 0.63 kip.642 kN No.56/(36×0.6 × 36.9) = 1. Agv.53 in2 Agt.9 in2 By assuming thickness of gusset plate = 0.53) + (58×0. assume the grade of steel is A36 therefore yield strength fy= 36 ksi and ultimate strength fu = 58 ksi.87× ) = 1.225 × 103 = 10 .6 × fu×Agt] ≤ φ [ 0.36-0.56 in Hence.45 kip > 50.75 [ (0. strength is nothing but the total load applied on the member = 50. of bolts = = 3. of bolts All checks are satisfied hence the designed member is safe.2 Solution by AISC Method Here. end bolt line..76)] ≤ 0. Ant = minimum gross and net area in tension from the bolt hole to the toe of the angle.75 × 58× 0.2 × Lc × ta × fu[AISC.78 φRn= 0. strength due to rupture and strength due to block shear.75 [ (0.OK Strength against rupture φRn= φ × 0.78 = 16.56 kip ….79= 1.62 in2 Ant = Agt – (0.75 × 0. constant = φ = 0.75 Net area = Anv = [ha-n (dh+ )]ta 2 Therefore.63 = 355. L4×3× [AISC. eqn.53)+(36×0. Anv = Agv–(2.2. page no-1503. strength of one bolt is the least value from bearing strength or shear strength.56/16. As per AISC. August 2013 Tdb1 = Tdb2 = = = 409. the tensile strength of designed member should be greater than the load applied on the member. respectively Agv = 7.79 inch with 3 nos.90 = 60. from T db1 & Tdb2 = 355.21 in2 From the manual the gross area of the section chosen from table is 20.91 in2 Yield strength = Fy = 36 ksi φRn= 0.International Journal of Science and Modern Engineering (IJISME) ISSN: 2319-6386.04 in2 Ultimate strength = Fu = 58 ksi φRn= 0.64 kip >50. calculated gross area is 1. J4-1] Where.39inch. fu.08 × = 2.5 × 0. Issue-9. eqn J5-3] = [118.62)] = 60.49 in2 No of shear planes = Ns = 0.100×75×8 mm with 5nos.Ant] Where.75 × 1.753 kip > 50.57 inch φRn= 0.63 kip No of bolts can be calculated by knowing the total load applied on the member and the strength of one bolt and here both values are known therefore. Avn + fu.45 ≤ 66.75 Clear distance between edge of one hole to other hole Lc= P – do = 2. Volume-1.3 BS Method Yield strength of member = . of bolts having 20mm dia. bolts. and the tensile strength nothing but the least value from strength due to yielding. strength = fy ×Ag × φ [AISC. perpendicular to the line of force.11 × 5/16 = 36. Bearing strength φRn= φ × 1.9 × 0.6× 58 ×1..56 in2. respectively Agt = 2.…OK Strength against block shear [AISC.61 kip Shear strengthφRn= φ × Fv× Ab × Ns where.6× Avn × fu [AISC.9 Gross area = Av = ha ×ta = 118.5×0.87 × φRn= 0. 50.87+ )] = 36.11-3(0. As per AISC manual. now choose an unequal angle section from AISC manual which has the same or slightly more are than calculated gross area. All checks are satisfied hence the designed member is safe.91 × 36= 71.6 × 58×1.879kN > 225kN…………OK Use Angle section of size .6× 36.9 Therefore.56 kip .J3-2a] Where. constant = φ = 0.04× 58= 940.OK Use angle section of size L 4 ×3 × having dia.D2-1] Where.

table-31] Std. rupture strength and strength due to block shear. for these parameters by the design of tension member with IS 800: 2007. The yield strength of given section by BS code is greater than remaining two codes because of the value of constant used in the formula is greater than other two.87 kN 60.45 kip 269.5×22)]= 430.Comparative Study of Design of Steel Structural Elements by using IS 800:2007.6. d = dia.38 kN 94. tried to keep the sizes of section are near about same. table-30] Where.28 kN BS : 5950 100×75×8 mm 337.OK = 225/50. of bolts = Check for strength Check for the design of tension member is taken as. The results came from above system development. the tensile strength of designed member should be greater than the load applied on the member.56 kN 308. Similarly the strength due to rupture by AISC is greater than the IS and BS code.45 ~ 5nos. As [BS: 5950.] Sectional Properties of the same section from the steel table are as follows:Ag = 1350 mm2 To calculate the strength of one bolt.05 kN > 225kN Graph 4. B-41. assume the thickness of gusset plate is 10 mm. Of hole =Dt= 22mm Therefore. PERFORMANCE ANALYSES The parameters considered for the comparative study of tension member are yield strength.26 kN No of bolts can be calculated by knowing the total load applied on the member and the strength of one bolt and here both values are known therefore. Dt)] Where. = Ke = 1.16 = 50.8 because number of bolts are 5 Net area = total gross area – area of hole An = 1350-(22× 8) = 1174 mm2 Tdn= = 308. for this study.ps = 160 and As = shear area = = (π 202)/4 = 314.06 kip Shear St. Design Strength = Py= 275 N/mm2 Thickness of section = t = 8mm Length of member = Lv= 280mm and Lt = 49. still. Strength of bolt = 50. 303. Shear strength Ps = ps.5 and Dia.05 > 225 kN.00 kN 430. 136. And strength due to block shear is more by BS method as compare to the IS and AISC code.5 kN> 225 kN.The graphical representation is also express here as follows by using excel.6 kN Strength of one bolt as per Standards is the minimum strength by shear strength or bearing strength of the bolt. α = 0.63 kN 71. RESULT DISSCUSOIN The values of strengths are different for the same section by the three codes are as given in table no 3.50 kN 418. Section chosen from BS 5950 manual is 100 × 75 × 8 mm [BS EN.16 mm2 Ps = 160 × 314. bb IV.2 (49. Therefore. Of bolt = 20mm ThickNess of section = tp = 8mm Bearing strength = p = 460 Pbb= 20× 8 × 460 = 73. Strength of one bolt Strength of one bolt as per Standards is the minimum strength by shear strength or bearing strength of the bolt. All checks are satisfied hence the designed member is safe. AISC 13th manual and BS 5950-1:2000 are presented in the table format as below: Table 3.1. 1:2000 Therefore gross area of the section is Ag = 900 mm2 By using calculated gross area choose section from BS manual having area slightly greater than the calculated.1 Strength against block shear 11 . Tdn= Where. Py × t [Lv + ke (Lt – k. thickness of gusset plate should be known hence.2 Constant = K = 0. Strength against yielding Pn = = = 337. AISC 13 th Edition and BS: 5950.26 kN Bearing Strength Pbb= d× tp × pbb [BS : 5950.5 mm Eff. III. 135.6 ×275 × 8 [280 + 1.26 = 4.1: Parameters for Tension Member Section Size 100×75×8 mm Yielding St. and the tensile strength nothing but the least value from strength due to yielding. 304. pr= 0. Code IS pr= 0.05 kN Rupture St. strength due to rupture and strength due to block shear. the section sizes may be same or may not be same because of unavailability of same size section in all the three codes.5 – 0. …. 355.05 kN Where. Strength against rupture As per BS 5950-1:2000 the strength due to or strength against rupture is given by.75 kip AISC L 4 ×3 × 319. No.Area coeff.

“ Comparison between BS 5950: Part 1:2000 and Eurocode 3 for the design of multi-story braced steel frame” ║UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia ║November 2006. Abbas Aminmansour. “Design of Structural Elements”. A. Volume-1. Handbook of Structural of Steelwork. Ascot. ChanakyaArya.║ University of Florida. “Design of Steel Structure”. “ Design of Steel Structure as per IS 800: 2007”. CONCLUSION As per the result discussion it has been observed that. ║The Steel Construction Institute. Version 13. IS 800:2007 ║3rd Revision║ New Delhi ║December 2007. REFERENCES [1] Danny J.1║AISC . USA. October 2011. Verma. “A New Approach for Design of Steel Beam Columns”. 3rd Edition. Yong.R. there is variation in the values of the strengths obtained by three different codes because of the variation in the values of the constants considered by the particular code are different and the main thing is that there is unavailability of same size section in all three codes. 4th Eidition. AitziberLópez and Miguel A. Version 14. Engineering Journal/Second Quarter ║2000. November-2011. M Krishnamoorthy. Berkshire SL5 7QN. Issue 11. M E Brettle BEng (Hons).║ BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 ║February 2006 and April 2009. S. Redbook. Prof. T. General Construction in steel – Code of Practice. Bat Quimby. Dr. May 2010. “Steelwork Design Guide to BS 5950-1:2000(Blue Book). [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] 12 .1║AISC .R. Duggal. Satish Kumar and Prof. “Steel Building Design: Design Data. Prof. “Comparative Study of Steel Angles as Tension Members Designed by Working Stress Method and Limit State Method”. Ascot. American Institute of steel Construction. Prof. RavindraBhimaraokulkarni. single angle. Design Examples .Volume .The Steel Construction Institute silwood Park. VikasArjunPatil. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 2. 13th edition ║United State of America ║ December 2005 . Serna . SL5 7QN. ISSN: 0975 – 6744║NOV 11 TO OCT 12 ║Volume 2. Knowledge and Research in Civil Engineering. Perry Green. “A comparative Study of AISC-LRFD and EC3 approaches to beamcolumn buckling resistance”. Issue 10. and tee shear connection”. Rohan Shrikant Jirage. Journal of Information. Ravindra Bhimarao Kulkarni. “Design of Steel Structure”. Design Examples .International Journal of Science and Modern Engineering (IJISME) ISSN: 2319-6386. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 2. Issue-9. The Steel Construction Institute Silwood Park. “Design of all bolted extended angle. “ Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structure” – Part 1-1 : General rules and rules for building.║University of Alaska Anchorage ║August 2008. ║Oct-2011. Engineering Journal║ First Quarter ║1999. ║18 September 2012 Richard M.Rolled and welded sections║ BS 5950-1:2000║ British Standard ║ BSI 05-2001.║The steel Construction Institute and The British Constructional Steelwork Association Limited.Open Sections In accordance with Eurocodes and the UK National Annexes”. CE 405. Elkin. Thomas Sputo. Part 1: Code of practice for design . designs to British Standards and Eurocodes. The British Construction Steelwork Association Ltd. Tata Steel. USA. berkshrie. Issue 1 Bureau Indian Standard. Drake and Sharon J.║6 September 2006. “Design Aids of Flexural Members and Beam-Columns Based on Limit State Method”.║AISC║ January 2005. “Steel Building Design: Worked Examples . Chan Chee Han.7th Edition.IIT Madras Prof. S. “A Beginner’s guide to the Steel Construction Manual”.Steel Sectional Table. Prof. “Design of Compression Member based on IS 800: 2007 and IS 800:1984 comparisons”. “Beam-Column Base Plate Design-LRFD Method”.K. A. August 2013 V. Spain . Tecnun – University of Navarra. Santha Kumar.

- 14 Secrets of 14th Edition ManualUploaded byReysan Caballero Gonzales
- 051200Uploaded bymiteshsuneriya
- Design of Connection-01aUploaded byAbu Abdul Fattah
- Ffs Fea Pipe ElbowUploaded byBashu Poudel
- Preshientation 4Uploaded byHamed Raza
- isbn9789512289738.pdfUploaded byjulio1051
- Irjet-v2i3318.pdfUploaded byTeju Ashu
- Solution of Strength of Materials ProblemsUploaded byKristine Zophiel Delfino
- c Sas 2012 p110 p121 Titen ScrewUploaded byTrần Đức Cường
- Job_notesUploaded byarmydg
- SECTION-2.pdfUploaded byherrerafarid
- chapjUploaded byManan
- 37 Round FerrulesUploaded byfinalist07
- ENG.aca.0004 Structural Design.dhakalUploaded byHundeejireenya
- Design PhilosophyUploaded bypaul macharia
- MBMA 96load CombinationsUploaded byAmlan Das
- Davit Arm Support Plate CheckUploaded byHZ Numismatic
- d CorbelUploaded byPrashant Dalvi
- Course 41Uploaded byattensionplease
- A1-S3-IME-MOS1-101109Uploaded byBabar Ali
- -FIB 34_ Model Code for Service Life Design. 34-FIB - The International Federation for Structural Concrete (Fib - Fédération Internationale Du Béton) (2006)Uploaded byharold
- Beam Column Web ConnectionsUploaded bymsiddiq1
- UCS DolomiteUploaded byranjeevkumar
- PRF_133-02Uploaded byghriss
- A Slightly Longer Look at Prying July 2016Uploaded byRaine Hope
- BOLTGRPUploaded byjembray
- fatigue_concrete.pdfUploaded bySonalisa Ray
- ES-14-403-20Uploaded bymalawany
- SAER-6028Uploaded bysethu1091
- BMP QPUploaded byVikrant Sharma

- 314742465-Two-way-Slab-Design-using-the-Coefficient-Method.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- 190-2.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- 1_571_4Uploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- 5704ca14ae380Uploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- JCE_67_2015_1_1_1136_ENUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- 0510836 sumUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- 26_thermalStress.pptxUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- JCE_67_2015_1_1_1136_EN.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- 1_introduction.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- 1_571_4.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- 314742465-Two-way-Slab-Design-using-the-Coefficient-Method.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- Presentation 1Uploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- 1_571_5.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- 26_thermalStress.pptxUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- VSL_____(2464)Uploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- sol_assign3.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- 1-s2.0-S1877705816327643-main.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- 02 Actual applications and potential of textile-reinforced concrete.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- Live loading.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- railwayModelling...pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- Modelling.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- 587kj-prestressed.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- sem.org-2007-SEM-Ann-Conf-s04p01-Investigations-Static-Dynamic-Performance-Railway-Prestressed.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- Sol Assign2Uploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- railwayModelling.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- sol_assign1.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- 17-130.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- 123-m2 railway.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- Live loading.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali
- sol_assign4.pdfUploaded byAmmar A. Ali