hi

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

12 views

6- Dynamic Stresses

hi

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- Attachment M - John Fowler - AnnexXRevB (1)
- Testing of Fasteners
- 07 Fatigue Failure I
- Influence of Surface Finish on Bending Fatigue of Forged Steel Including Heating Method, Hardness, And Shot Cleaning Effects
- Fatigue Overview
- Finite-Element-Analysis-Revealed
- UK Rules for PRessure Vessels
- 50665659 Karthy Padeye Design
- SOM question bank
- Kn 2417861791
- Aluminum 2024-T4-2024-T351
- Fatigue Life of Wind Turbine Structural Components
- 03
- Report Mahmoud
- A Review of Advances in Fatigue and Life Prediction of Fiber-reinforced Composites
- CIE 324 Lessons 14 and 15 Rev 0(1)
- ME2303-Design of Machine Elements
- Glass Beams
- Failure Investigation of the Disc Harrow Profiles and Redesingning
- Finalt.sol.Spring2017

You are on page 1of 6

springs, pinion teeth etc.) are subjected to variable or alternating loads (also known as fluctuating or fatigue loads). For example in figure-3.3.1.1, the fiber on the surface of a rotating shaft subjected to a bending load, undergoes both tension and compression for each revolution of the shaft.

Any fiber on the shaft is therefore subjected to fluctuating stresses. Machine elements subjected to fluctuating stresses usually fail at stress levels much below their ultimate strength and in many cases below the yield point of the material too. These failures occur due to very large number of stress cycle and are known as fatigue failure. Stress cycle

A typical stress cycle is shown in figure, where the maximum, minimum, mean and variable stresses are indicated. The mean and variable stresses are given by

Fatigue and Endurance Limit It has been found experimentally that when a material is subjected to repeated stresses, it fails at stresses below the yield point stresses. Such type of failure of a material is known as fatigue.

In order to study the effect of fatigue of a material, a rotating mirror beam method is used. In this method, a standard mirror polished specimen, as shown in Fig. 6.2 (a), is rotated in a fatigue testing machine while the specimen is loaded in bending. As the specimen rotates, the bending stress at the upper fibres varies from maximum compressive to maximum tensile while the bending stress at the lower fibres varies from maximum tensile to maximum

compressive. In other words, the specimen is subjected to a completely reversed stress cycle. This is represented by a time-stress diagram as shown in Fig. 6.2 (b). A record is kept of the number of cycles required to produce failure at a given stress, and the results are plotted in stress-cycle curve as shown in Fig. 6.2 (c). A little consideration will show that if the stress is kept below a certain value as shown by dotted line in Fig. 6.2 (c), the material will not fail whatever may be the number of cycles. This stress, as represented by dotted line, is known as endurance or fatigue limit (e). It is defined as maximum value of the completely reversed bending stress which a polished standard specimen can withstand without failure, for infinite number of cycles (usually 107 cycles). It may be noted that the term endurance limit is used for reversed bending only while for other types of loading, the term endurance strength may be used when referring the fatigue strength of the material. It may be defined as the safe maximum stress which can be applied to the machine part working under actual conditions. We have seen that when a machine member is subjected to a completely reversed stress, the maximum stress in tension is equal to the maximum stress in compression as shown in Fig. 6.2 (b). In actual practice, many machine members undergo different range of stress than the completely reversed stress. The stress verses time diagram for fluctuating stress having values min and max is shown in Fig. 6.2 (e). The variable stress, in general, may be considered as a combination of steady (or mean or average) stress and a completely reversed stress component v. The following relations are derived from Fig. 6.2 (e):

Effect of Loading on Endurance LimitLoad Factor

The endurance limit (e) of a material as determined by the rotating beam method is for reversed bending load. There are many machine members which are subjected to loads other than reversed bending loads. Thus the endurance limit will also be different for different types of loading. The endurance limit depending upon the type of loading may be modified as discussed below: Let Kb = Load correction factor for the reversed or rotating bending load. Its value is usually taken as unity. Ka = Load correction factor for the reversed axial load. Its value may be taken as 0.8. Ks = Load correction factor for the reversed torsional or shear load. Its value may be taken as 0.55 for

ductile materials and 0.8 for brittle materials. Endurance limit for reversed bending load, eb = e.Kb = e ...( QKb = 1) Endurance limit for reversed axial load, ea = e.Ka and endurance limit for reversed torsional or shear load, e = e.Ks

When a machine member is subjected to variable loads, the endurance limit of the material for that member depends upon the surface conditions. Fig. 6.3 shows the values of surface finish factor for the various surface conditions and ultimate tensile strength.

When the surface finish factor is known, then the endurance limit for the material of the machine member may be obtained by multiplying the endurance limit and the surface finish factor. We see that for a mirror polished material, the surface finish factor is unity. In other words, the endurance limit for mirror polished material is maximum and it goes on reducing due to surface condition. Let Ksur = Surface finish factor. Endurance limit, e1 = eb.Ksur= e.Kb.Ksur = e.Ksur ...( Q Kb = 1)

...(For reversed bending load) = ea.Ksur = e.Ka.Ksur ...(For reversed axial load) = e.Ksur = e.Ks.Ksur ...(For reversed torsional or shear load) Note : The surface finish factor for non-ferrous metals may be taken as unity.

A little consideration will show that if the size of the standard specimen as shown in Fig. 6.2 ( a) is increased, then the endurance limit of the material will decrease. This is due to the fact that a longer specimen will have more defects than a smaller one. Let Ksz = Size factor. Endurance limit, e2 = e1 Ksz ...(Considering surface finish factor also) = eb.Ksur.Ksz = e.Kb.Ksur.Ksz = e.Ksur.Ksz ( Q Kb = 1)

= ea.Ksur.Ksz = e.Ka.Ksur.Ksz ...(For reversed axial load) = e.Ksur.Ksz = e.Ks.Ksur.Ksz ... (For reversed torsional or shear load)

Notes: 1. The value of size factor is taken as unity for the standard specimen having nominal diameter of 7.657 mm. 2. When the nominal diameter of the specimen is more than 7.657 mm but less than 50 mm, the value of size factor may be taken as 0.85. 3. When the nominal diameter of the specimen is more than 50 mm, then the value of size factor may be taken as 0.75.

In addition to the surface finish factor (Ksur), size factor (Ksz) and load factors Kb, Ka and Ks, there are many other factors such as reliability factor ( Kr), temperature factor (Kt), impact factor (Ki) etc. which has effect on the endurance limit of a material. Considering all these factors, the endurance limit may be determined by using the following expressions : 1. For the reversed bending load, endurance limit, 'e = eb.Ksur.Ksz.Kr.Kt.Ki 2. For the reversed axial load, endurance limit, 'e = ea.Ksur.Ksz.Kr.Kt.Ki 3. For the reversed torsional or shear load, endurance limit, 'e = e.Ksur.Ksz.Kr.Kt.Ki In solving problems, if the value of any of the above factors is not known, it may be taken as unity.

It has been found experimentally that endurance limit ( e) of a material subjected to fatigue loading is a function of ultimate tensile strength (u). Fig. 6.4 shows the endurance limit of steel corresponding to ultimate tensile strength for different surface conditions. Following are some empirical relations commonly used in practice :

For steel, e = 0.5 u ; For cast steel, e = 0.4 u ; For cast iron, e = 0.35 u ; For non-ferrous metals and alloys, e = 0.3 u

When a component is subjected to fatigue loading, the endurance limit is the criterion for faliure. Therefore, the factor of safety should be based on endurance limit. Mathematically,

Note: For steel, e = 0.8 to 0.9 y where e = Endurance limit stress for completely reversed stress cycle, and y = Yield point stress.

- Attachment M - John Fowler - AnnexXRevB (1)Uploaded byBùi Văn Hợp
- Testing of FastenersUploaded bymp87_ing
- 07 Fatigue Failure IUploaded byforemar
- Influence of Surface Finish on Bending Fatigue of Forged Steel Including Heating Method, Hardness, And Shot Cleaning EffectsUploaded bymoj33
- Fatigue OverviewUploaded bylucrare2004
- Finite-Element-Analysis-RevealedUploaded byvijendra_1893
- UK Rules for PRessure VesselsUploaded byMeghan Ghone
- 50665659 Karthy Padeye DesignUploaded byandi_nu
- SOM question bankUploaded byprasanthprp
- Kn 2417861791Uploaded byAnonymous 7VPPkWS8O
- Aluminum 2024-T4-2024-T351Uploaded byRaj Eklure
- Fatigue Life of Wind Turbine Structural ComponentsUploaded byGwePark
- 03Uploaded byzzccgmailit
- Report MahmoudUploaded byنزار جبار
- A Review of Advances in Fatigue and Life Prediction of Fiber-reinforced CompositesUploaded bypushparajpingulkar
- CIE 324 Lessons 14 and 15 Rev 0(1)Uploaded byTrung T Truong
- ME2303-Design of Machine ElementsUploaded bySith Ananthan
- Glass BeamsUploaded byพังงา บุญสวัสดิ์
- Failure Investigation of the Disc Harrow Profiles and RedesingningUploaded byEmir Abazović
- Finalt.sol.Spring2017Uploaded byPotatoes123
- Notes3 Cracking Flexure-1sxrh32Uploaded byWayne Cheng Zhu
- PRC LAB MANUALUploaded byMazharYasin
- 17434Uploaded byarash0000
- Design_of_Leaf_Springs.pdfUploaded byGerry Villamor Lindayao Jr.
- Effects on the Fatigue Lives of RC BeamsUploaded byJames Chu
- minggu-2.pptxUploaded byAhmad Yani
- SRS-285Uploaded bySuperducks
- 4Uploaded byEzra Silalahi
- 07055Uploaded byAnupamMishra
- gouper.pdfUploaded byAnonymous cfAhMq

- ExercisesUploaded byAlexandra Pity
- assnment-0Uploaded byTanu Rd
- NTM-CLASS1Uploaded byTanu Rd
- Indian History PicturesUploaded byTanu Rd
- Indian GeographyUploaded byV Anil Kumar
- HISTRY-IND1Uploaded byTanu Rd
- lbm0-9Uploaded byTanu Rd
- Miscellaneous QuestionsUploaded byTanu Rd
- Gist of NCERT Indian Art CultureUploaded byTanu Rd
- Gautama Buddha and Development of BuddhismUploaded byTanu Rd
- Later Vedic Period and SocietyUploaded byTanu Rd
- 100 Questions on Science TechnologyUploaded byvgas
- Movement for TelanganaUploaded byTanu Rd
- 100Uploaded byTanu Rd
- tense-changes-0.docxUploaded byTanu Rd
- Seemandhra.co.in - Strength of Materials-II(1) 0Uploaded byTanu Rd
- Seemandhra.co.in - Machine Drawing-2 0Uploaded byTanu Rd
- EBM-887Uploaded byTanu Rd
- AEE GS EnglishUploaded byTanu Rd
- ECM-APP-78Uploaded byTanu Rd
- ECG--123Uploaded byTanu Rd
- ALL-354Uploaded byTanu Rd
- passivevoicechart-130622150953-phpapp01.docUploaded byTanu Rd
- Activeandpassive Charts 110323130458 Phpapp01Uploaded byTanu Rd
- Current Affairs 2017 Telugu Bit Bank Download 4Uploaded byTanu Rd
- Current Affairs 2017 Telugu Bit Bank Download 3Uploaded byTanu Rd
- G1Uploaded byTanu Rd
- Modal.verbs.withkeyUploaded byAnonymous zqdKPKoX
- Active and Passive VoiceUploaded byFxwireless

- Poles Program ManualUploaded byahm_shaaban
- 2126 case lemnUploaded byipadius
- Puertas Hmma 863-04Uploaded bycorrokoko
- Pip Stc01018Uploaded byJose Luis Velasco Cadavid
- ACI 358 Railway LaodingUploaded byTommy Yap
- Zapdf.com Ieee Guide for Transmission Structure Foundation dUploaded byvishnumani3011
- RSTAB ExampleUploaded byflorinelvv
- SP6 (6) 1972Uploaded bySourabhAdike
- ISO 13814_2004Uploaded byapsaraso
- GHANA BUILDING CODE - PART 05.pdfUploaded byvasvuk
- reinforced_concrete_pipe_-_ar_full_catalog.pdfUploaded byRamsi Ankzi
- CMAA Wall Design GuideUploaded byJack Leaman
- Process ManualUploaded byAnonymous UoHUag
- SunitaUploaded byRabi Dhakal
- DURACRETEaguidelinefordurabilitybaseddesignofconcretestructuresUploaded bycarlodoimo
- Austroads Guide to Bridge Technology Part 7 - Maintenance and Management of Existing BridgesUploaded bytoddlbyrnes
- Excel BridgeUploaded byRenxiang Lu
- Limit State Design of Steel Str - S K DuggalUploaded byNirdesh Sharma
- ADM008Uploaded byKaiser Edward
- PC-004_Access Gallery Standard Precast DesignUploaded byhasan_kygsz
- ac23-13AUploaded byZbor Zbor
- 3905_engl_2012_11 KTAUploaded bykartoon_38
- Design for Fatigue - Module 7Uploaded bywinstonsequeira
- BuildingUploaded byMohan Krishna
- design of offshore structureUploaded byDINESH
- LEAP Bridge Precast E1 TRN015400-1-0001Uploaded byjuanva1976
- PDC TR 06 08_Anti Terrorism Response LimitsUploaded byEthan Chen
- MBG_534_12 - Manual Diseño de GratingUploaded byEnergia_X
- Section-02 Testing RequirementUploaded byChaitanya Shakya
- Dissertation ReportUploaded bypirazor