Interval graphs have drawn the attention of many researchers for over 30 years. They are
extensively studied and revealed their practical relevance for modeling problems arising in the real
world.
In this paper we discuss various cases in which the dominating set constructed by the algorithm
becomes an accurate dominating set, total accurate dominating set and also the cases where it is not an
accurate dominating set and a total accurate dominating set.

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

3 views

Interval graphs have drawn the attention of many researchers for over 30 years. They are
extensively studied and revealed their practical relevance for modeling problems arising in the real
world.
In this paper we discuss various cases in which the dominating set constructed by the algorithm
becomes an accurate dominating set, total accurate dominating set and also the cases where it is not an
accurate dominating set and a total accurate dominating set.

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- Assignments-discrete maths
- Clique Npc Proof
- Graph Theory Tutorial
- Recent Results in Independence Domination
- math 4
- Algossss....
- Raphael Yuster- Disjoint Color-Avoiding Triangles
- m3p17 Discrete Mathematics
- 00009102
- Collaborative Research Networks @ CWN
- Apma Guide
- Face Recognition
- BC0052 - Theory of Computer Science Set-1.docx
- Graph Web
- Special Class Extended Mean Corial Graphs
- Vertex Polynomial of Open Star of graphs
- Computing Efficiency of Complex Networks
- PPT on Heat and Electric LF_neural_networks
- A Fast Kernel-based Multilevel Algorithm for Graph Clustering
- 315-831-1-PB

You are on page 1of 9

TECHNOLOGY (IJCET)

ISSN 0976 6367(Print) ISSN 0976 6375(Online) Volume 5, Issue 1, January (2014), pp. 85-93 IAEME: www.iaeme.com/ijcet.asp Journal Impact Factor (2013): 6.1302 (Calculated by GISI) www.jifactor.com

IJCET

IAEME

K. Dhanalakshmi and B. Maheswari Department of Applied Mathematics, Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvsavidyalayam, Tirupati - 517502, A.P, India

ABSTRACT Interval graphs have drawn the attention of many researchers for over 30 years. They are extensively studied and revealed their practical relevance for modeling problems arising in the real world. In this paper we discuss various cases in which the dominating set constructed by the algorithm becomes an accurate dominating set, total accurate dominating set and also the cases where it is not an accurate dominating set and a total accurate dominating set. Keywords: Algorithm, Dominating Set, Accurate Dominating Set, Total Accurate Dominating Set, Clique, Interval Graph. Subject Classification: 68R10 1. INTRODUCTION The theory of domination in graphs introduced by Ore [1] and Berge[2] is an emerging area of research in graph theory today. The concept of accurate domination and total accurate domination was introduced by Kulli and Kattimani [3]. They have studied this concept for various standard graphs and obtained bounds. A Dominating set D of a graph G(V, E) is called an accurate dominating set if < V D > has no dominating set of cardinality D . The accurate domination number a is the number of vertices in a minimum accurate dominating set of G. A total dominating set T of G is called a total accurate dominating set if < V - T > has no total dominating set of cardinality T . The total accurate domination number ta is the number of vertices in a minimum total accurate dominating set of G, where G has no isolated vertices.

85

International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 09766367(Print), ISSN 0976 - 6375(Online), Volume 5, Issue 1, January (2014), IAEME 2. INTERVAL GRAPH Let I = {1,2,...,n} be an interval family where each i in I is an interval on the real line and i = [ai, bi] for i = 1, 2,. n. Here ai is called the left endpoint and bi is called the right endpoint of i. Without loss of generality, we assume that all endpoints of the intervals in I are distinct numbers between 1 and 2n. The intervals are labeled with respect to their right end points. Two intervals i and j are said to intersect each other if they have non-empty intersection. A graph G(V, E) is called an interval graph if there is a one-to-one correspondence between V and I such that two vertices of G are joined by an edge in E if and only if their corresponding intervals in I intersect. We construct a dominating set given by the following algorithm. The dominating set becomes minimum [4]. 3. ALGORITHM : MDS - IG Input Output Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 : : : : : : : : : : Interval family I = { 1,2,.n}. Minimum dominating set of the interval graph G. Let S = {max (1)}. LI = The largest interval in S. Compute Next (LI ). If Next (LI) = null then go to step 8. Find max( Next (LI ) ). If max( Next (LI ) ) does not exist then max( Next (LI ) ) = Next (LI ). S = S max( Next (LI ) ) ) go to step 2. End.

4. ACCURATE DOMINATING SETS We assume that G is always a connected graph. Also D is the minimum dominating set of G constructed by the above algorithm . Theorem 1 : Let i and j be any two intervals in I such that i D , j i and there is no interval k in I such that k intersects j. Then D becomes an accurate dominating set of G. Proof : Let D be the minimum dominating set of G constructed by the algorithm. Let i D and j I such that i, j satisfy the hypothesis of the theorem. Then clearly in < V - D >, j becomes an isolated vertex. Thus the dominating set of < V - D > must include the vertex j. In general (V D) (G) for any subset D of V. Hence it follows in this case that (V D) (G) + 1 > (G ) Thus D becomes an accurate dominating set of G. Theorem 2 : Let D = {x1, x2.xm} be such that < N[x1] u1 >, < N [x2] u2 > ... < N[xm] > are cliques, where u1, u2 um-1 are the last vertices dominated by x1, x2 xm-1 respectively. If u1, u2 um-1 are also the first vertices in N[x2], N[x3], N [xm] respectively, then D is not an accurate dominating set of G. Proof : Since N[x1] is a clique, if we remove x1 from N[x1], then it is obvious that N (x1) is also a clique. Similar is the case with the other N[xi]s. By the construction of D, it is clear that x1, x2xm are the last vertices in their respective

86

International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 09766367(Print), ISSN 0976 - 6375(Online), Volume 5, Issue 1, January (2014), IAEME cliques. Since N(xi)s are cliques, any set of m vertices from these N(xi)s respectively form a dominating set for < V - D >. Hence the dominating set of < V - D > contains exactly m vertices so that D cannot be an accurate dominating set. Theorem 3 : Let D = {x1, x2 xm} where u1, u2,um be the first vertices dominated by x1, x2 xm respectively. Suppose < {u1 . x1} >, <{ u2 x2}>, . <{ um xm}> are cliques. If there are vertices between xi-1 and ui where i = 2,3, m , then D is not an accurate dominating set. Proof : Let x1, x2 xm, u1, u2 um satisfy the hypothesis of the theorem. Then two cases arise. Case 1 : Suppose there is a vertex between xi-1 and ui say vi, i 1 . Since G is connected we have xi-1 and vi are adjacent and also ui and vi are adjacent. Then as in the proof of Theorem 2, in this case also < V - D > contains a dominating set of m vertices only. But not as in Theorem 2 that any set of m vertices from N(xi)s respectively forms a dominating set of < V - D >. We specify the dominating set of < V - D > as follows. Consider D1 = {x1-1, u2, u3, .um} in < V - D >. Since x1 < V D > , the vertices in N(x1) are dominated by x1-1 and v2 is dominated by u2. So x1-1 and u2 are included in a dominating set of < V - D >. Now u 2 N ( x 2 ) and so u2 dominates the rest of vertices in N(x2). Since x 2 < V D > , the vertex v3 is now dominated by u3 and u 3 N ( x 3 ) and u3 dominates the rest of the vertices in N(x3). Thus u3 is included in a dominating set of < V - D >. The argument goes on like this and ultimately D1 becomes a dominating set of < V - D > which contains exactly m vertices. So D cannot be an accurate dominating set of G. Case 2 : Suppose there is one more vertex between ui and vi say wi such that xi-1, vi, wi, ui, i 1 are consecutive vertices which are adjacent consecutively. Then if we consider this interval family and construct the dominating set in accordance with the algorithm, then ui enters into dominating set which is not the case. Hence this case does not exist, if D is given as per the hypothesis. Remark : Suppose some vertices in N(xi) are adjacent with some vertices in N(xj), i j or no vertex in N(xi) is adjacent to a vertex in N(xj), i j . In both the cases, we can show that the dominating set of < V - D > contains only m vertices, so that D cannot be an accurate dominating set of G. Theorem 4 : Let D = {x1, x2. .. xm} be such that <{ u1 x1}>, <{ u2 x2}>, <{um .xm}> are cliques, where u1, u2 ,...,um be the first vertices dominated by x1, x2 .xm respectively. Suppose there are vertices between xi-1 and ui where i 1 . Then D is an accurate dominating set of G if all the intermediate vertices between xi-1 and ui are dominated by xi-1. Proof : Let x1, x2 .. xm, u1, u2 .. um satisfy the hypothesis of the theorem. Suppose there are intermediate vertices between xi-1 and ui, the first vertex in the clique N[xi]. By hypothesis, xi-1 dominates all these vertices. Let these vertices be w1, w2 wk say where xi1 < w1 < w2 << wk < ui. Since we have right endpoint labeling, xi-1 dominates wk implies that wk is adjacent to w1, w2 wk-1. That is wk dominates all these vertices. Consider < V - D >. Since N(xi)s are cliques any set of m vertices from these N(xi)s dominate the vertices in these N(xi)s respectively. Hence if we consider the set D1 = { x1-1, x2-1, ..xi-1-1, wk , xi-1, ..xm-1} then clearly D1 is a dominating set of < V D > . Further < V - D > has no dominating set of cardinality lower than m+1 , because, from the m

87

International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 09766367(Print), ISSN 0976 - 6375(Online), Volume 5, Issue 1, January (2014), IAEME cliques, a set of m vertices (which is minimum) are chosen and a single vertex wk, which dominates all intermediate vertices between x i-1 and ui which were not dominated by any of these m vertices is included. So D1 = m+1 whereas D = m. Therefore D becomes an accurate dominating set of G. Remark : For the interval family, considered in the above theorem, there may be a possibility that < V - D > has isolated vertices. Also the hypotheses of Theorems 2 and 3 is satisfied between xi-1 and ui for any i but not for all i. But for at least one i, the hypothesis of Theorem 4 must be satisfied. For all such possibilities we get an accurate dominating set. Theorem 5 : Let D = {x1, x2 xm} and < V - D > has no isolated vertices. Then D is not an accurate dominating set of G if and only if a = + 1 . Proof : Let D = {x1, x2 .xm} be the minimum dominating set of G constructed by the algorithm. Suppose D is not an accurate dominating set of G. Let D1 = { x1, x2-1, x2, x3, .. xm}. Clearly D1 is a dominating set of G. In < V - D1 >, consider the set D2 = {x1 -1, x2-2, x3-1, . xm-1}. By the construction of dominating set D in G it is clear that the vertices in D2 dominate the vertices in < V - D >. Since < V - D > has no isolated vertices and D1 = m +1 and D 2 = m, it follows that D1 is an accurate dominating set of G. Hence a = m+1 = + 1. Conversely, let a = + 1. Then it is obvious that D is not an accurate dominating set of G. Otherwise D a = + 1 which is not possible, since D = . We can easily prove the following theorem.

Theorem 6 : Let G be an interval graph with n vertices such that G is a path from vertex 1 to vertex n. If n is a multiple of 3, then the minimum dominating set constructed by the algorithm becomes an accurate dominating set. That is a = . Otherwise a = + 1. 5. TOTAL ACCURATE DOMINATING SET Theorem 7 : We assume that G is always a connected graph and G has no isolated vertices. Let i and j be any two intervals in G such that j i and there is no interval k in I such that k intersects j. Then G has no total accurate dominating set. Proof : Let T be a total dominating set of G and i, j satisfy the hypothesis of the theorem. Then clearly i T and in < V - T >, j becomes an isolated vertex. Therefore we cannot construct a total dominating set in < V - T >. Hence G has no total accurate dominating set. Theorem 8 : Let D = {x1,x2 .xm} be such that < N[x1]-u2 >, < N[x2]-u3 > < N[xm] > are cliques, where ui is the first vertex dominated by xi. Then G posseses a total accurate dominating set if there are no vertices between xi and ui+1 for i = 1,2,.m-1. Proof : Let x1, x2 xm, u1, u2 um satisfy the hypothesis of the theorem. Since G is a connected graph, xi and ui+1 are adjacent. Since < N[xi] ui+1 > is a clique, xi dominates all vertices in this clique. Further, since um is the first vertex dominated by xm, um dominates all vertices in N[xm]. Therefore if we consider T = { x1, u2, x2, u3, .. xm-1, um}, then clearly T is a total dominating set of G. Further

88

International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 09766367(Print), ISSN 0976 - 6375(Online), Volume 5, Issue 1, January (2014), IAEME

T = 2m 2 , since we have not included the vertices u1 and xm into T.

Consider < V-T >. Since N[xi]s are cliques, N(xi) is also a clique. So < V - T > contains m components, each of which is a clique. In order to get a total dominating set in < V- T >, we have to choose two vertices from each such component which is also a clique, so that a total dominating set in < V - T > contains at least 2m vertices as there are m such components. Therefore a total dominating set T1 in < V - T > contains at least 2m vertices. That is T T1 . Hence T becomes a total accurate dominating set in G. Theorem 9 : We assume that G is always a connected graph and G has no isolated vertices. Let D = {x1,x2xm} be such that < {u1,.x1} >, < {u2x2} > ..< {um.xm} > are cliques, where u1,u2 .um are the first vertices dominated by x1,x2 .xm respectively. If there is one vertex between xi and ui+1, then G possesses a total accurate dominating set. Proof : Let x1, x2 .. xm, u1, u2 .. um satisfy the hypothesis of the theorem. Case 1 : Suppose there is one vertex between xi and ui+1 say vi. Since G is a connected graph xi, vi are adjacent and vi, ui+1 are adjacent. Consider T = {x1, u2, x2, u3.... xi, vi, ui+1, xi+1, ui+2.. xm-1, um}. Since < {ui.xi} > is a clique, xi dominates all vertices between ui and xi, including ui. Further xi and vi are adjacent. Therefore T becomes total dominating set of G. Further T = 2 m 1 , since we have excluded the vertices u1, xm and included the vertex vi. Consider < V - T >. Since N[xi]s are cliques, N(xi) is also a clique. Then < V - T > contains m components, each of which is a clique. In order to get a total dominating set, we have to choose two vertices from each such component which is also a clique, so that a total dominating set in < V - T > contains at least 2m vertices as there are m such components. Therefore a total dominating set T1 in < V - T > contains at least 2m vertices. That is T T1 . Hence T becomes a total accurate dominating set in G. Remark : Suppose there is one more vertex between xi and ui+1 say wi such that xi, vi, wi, ui+1 are consecutive vertices which are adjacent consecutively. Then if we consider this interval family and construct the dominating set in accordance with the algorithm, then ui+1 enters into dominating set instead of xi+1. Hence this possibility does not arise, if D is given as per the hypothesis. ILLUSTRATIONS Theorem 5

7 3 1 2 5 6 8 11 13 4 10 12 14 9

89

International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 09766367(Print), ISSN 0976 - 6375(Online), Volume 5, Issue 1, January (2014), IAEME

14 13 3 12 4 11 5 1 2

10 9 8 7

Fig. 2 : Interval Graph G The dominating set according to the algorithm is D = {3, 7, 11, 14} Here x1 = 3, x2 = 7, x3 = 11, x4 = 12 and = 4 Consider < V - D >. It is given by

1 2

13

12

10 9

Fig. 3: Vertex induced subgraph < V - D > The dominating set in < V - D > is D = {2, 5, 9, 12} That is D = D Therefore D is not an accurate dominating set in G. Let us take a dominating set with cardinality + 1 Consider D1 = {3, 6, 7,11, 14} Here x1 = 3, x2 1 = 6, x2 = 7, x3 = 11, x4 = 14 Clearly D1 is a dominating set of G Consider < V - D1 > . It is given by

1 2 4

5 8

13 9 12 10

90

International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 09766367(Print), ISSN 0976 - 6375(Online), Volume 5, Issue 1, January (2014), IAEME The dominating set in < V - D1 > is D2 = {2, 5, 10, 13} Here x1 1 = 2, x2 2 = 5, x3 1 = 10, x4 1 = 13 That is D 1 D 2 Therefore D1 becomes an accurate dominating set in G. Thus a = D1 = 5 = 4 + 1 = + 1 . Theorem 8

2 7 1 3 6 4 8 12 5 9 11 10

1 2

3 12 4

11

5 6 10 9 7

Fig. 2 : Interval Graph G The dominating set according to the algorithm is D = {4, 8, 12} Here x1 = 4, x2 = 8, x3 = 12 u1 = 1, u2 = 5, u3 = 9 The total dominating set is T = {4,5,8,9} Consider < V - T >. It is given by

1 2 3

12

11

10

Fig. 3 : Vertex induced subgraph < V - T > The total dominating set in < V - T > is T1 = {2, 3, 6, 7, 11, 12} We get that T T1 Thus T becomes a total accurate dominating set in G.

91

International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 09766367(Print), ISSN 0976 - 6375(Online), Volume 5, Issue 1, January (2014), IAEME Theorem 9

2 7 1 3 6 4 8 12 13 5 9 11 14 15 16 10 17

17 16 3 15 4 14 5 13 6 12 7 11 10 9 8 1 2

Fig. 2: Interval Graph G The dominating set according to the algorithm is D = {4, 8, 13, 17} Here x1 = 4, x2 = 8, x3 = 13, x4 = 17 u1 = 1, u2 = 5, u3 = 10, u4 = 14, v2 = 9 The total dominating set is T = {4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14} F

1 2 17

3 16 6 15 12 7

11

Fig. 3: Vertex induced subgraph < V - T > Consider < V- T >. It is given by The total dominating set in < V - T > is T1 = {2, 3, 6, 7, 11, 12, 16, 17} We get that T T1 Thus T becomes a total accurate dominating set in G.

92

International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 09766367(Print), ISSN 0976 - 6375(Online), Volume 5, Issue 1, January (2014), IAEME REFERENCES [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Ore. O Theory of Graphs, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ. 38, Providence, (1962). Berge. C Theory of Graphs and its applications, Methuen, London (1962). Kattimani. M.B. Some New Contributions to Graph Theory, Ph.D. thesis, Gulbarga University, India (2000). Laksmi Naidu Y. Some studies of Algorithms on Interval graphs and Circular arc-graphs, Ph.D.thesis, S.P.Mahila Visvavidyalayam, India,(1999). M.Siva Parvathi and B.Maheswari, Minimal Dominating Functions of Corona Product Graph of a Cycle with a Complete Graph, International Journal of Computer Engineering & Technology (IJCET), Volume 4, Issue 4, 2013, pp. 248 - 256, ISSN Print: 0976 6367, ISSN Online: 0976 6375. Makke Siva Parvathi and Bommireddy Maheswari, Minimal Dominating Functions of Corona Product Graph of a Path with a Star, International Journal of Information Technology and Management Information Systems (IJITMIS), Volume 5, Issue 1, 2014, pp. 1 - 11, ISSN Print: 0976 6405, ISSN Online: 0976 6413. M.Manjuri and B.Maheswari, Strong Dominating Sets of Strong Product Graph of Cayley Graphs with Arithmetic Graphs, International Journal of Computer Engineering & Technology (IJCET), Volume 4, Issue 6, 2013, pp. 136 - 144, ISSN Print: 0976 6367, ISSN Online: 0976 6375.

[6]

[7]

93

- Assignments-discrete mathsUploaded bySundeep Chopra
- Clique Npc ProofUploaded bymanudilipshah
- Graph Theory TutorialUploaded byPatrick Ramos
- Recent Results in Independence DominationUploaded bychithu1234
- math 4Uploaded byKC PISONET-1
- Algossss....Uploaded bygurusodhii
- Raphael Yuster- Disjoint Color-Avoiding TrianglesUploaded byMnaom
- m3p17 Discrete MathematicsUploaded byja05
- Collaborative Research Networks @ CWNUploaded byDr Dimitrina Dimitrova
- 00009102Uploaded byCarlos Cardenas
- Apma GuideUploaded byJD614
- Face RecognitionUploaded byapi-3719303
- Graph WebUploaded bymuhammad danish butt
- BC0052 - Theory of Computer Science Set-1.docxUploaded byVinod Hanumantharayappa
- Special Class Extended Mean Corial GraphsUploaded byIJIRST
- Vertex Polynomial of Open Star of graphsUploaded bysowmya
- Computing Efficiency of Complex NetworksUploaded bySriniketh Vijayaraghavan
- PPT on Heat and Electric LF_neural_networksUploaded bygsaibaba
- A Fast Kernel-based Multilevel Algorithm for Graph ClusteringUploaded byManoj Lohumi
- 315-831-1-PBUploaded byRandeep Kaur
- Lab 11Uploaded bysufyanali43
- Satish.xlsxUploaded byvinita
- supernode-selection-Lo-01517787Uploaded byhaowei
- Zigkolis C FCM Brain ResponsesUploaded bynoorahmed1991
- Neutrosophic Modeling of Investment ArchitecturesUploaded byAnonymous 0U9j6BLllB
- A Hybrid Optimization Algorithm Based OnUploaded byAdam Hansen
- Comp SciUploaded byKumar Amitesh
- 4 Layout Planning Models1Uploaded byShafeer Khan
- massey.pdfUploaded bymacstone
- Discount factorUploaded byDevin Maa

- THE EFFECT OF LEADERSHIP ON WORK EFFECTIVENESS OF THECORPS SUPPLY OFFICER AT TNI AL MABES, JAKARTAUploaded byIAEME Publication
- PHOTOVOLTAIC AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF COMPOSITE FILMS OF TETRAPHENYL PORPHYRINAND YTTRIUM VANADATEDOPED WITH EUROPIUM AND BISMUTHUploaded byIAEME Publication
- THE ROLE OF HIGH THROUGHPUT SATELLITE AS SKY HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT THE ACCELERATION OF INTERNET ENTRY INTO VILLAGES IN INDONESIAUploaded byIAEME Publication
- METHOD FOR EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF RADIOPATHSUploaded byIAEME Publication
- CAUSES OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ACT, 2007 AMONG FEDERAL AND STATES TERTIARY INSTITUTIONS IN PROJECT DELIVERY IN SOUTHWEST, NIGERIAUploaded byIAEME Publication
- PRACTICAL DESIGN ANDTESTING OF WIND DRIVEN WATER PUMPINGSYSTEMSUploaded byIAEME Publication
- ADAPTATION OF THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY TO CHANGES IN ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATIONUploaded byIAEME Publication
- THE COLLAPSE BEHAVIOROFTHE RECTANGULAR HOLLOW PIPES UNDERCOMPRESSION LOADUploaded byIAEME Publication
- ASSESSMENT OF SNOW ACCUMULATION AND JUSTIFICATION OFPARAMETERS OF STUBBLE COULISSES INTHE ARID STEPPE OF NORTHERN KAZAKHSTANUploaded byIAEME Publication
- FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OFPOWERTRANSFORMERUploaded byIAEME Publication
- PERFORMANCE ANALYSISOF TURBINE VENTILATORS FOR REFUGEE CAMPS USAGEUploaded byIAEME Publication
- IMPROVING THE ADAPTIVE EFFECTING FOR ACTIVE POWER FILTER USING FUZZY CONTROL INTHE DC LINK VOLTAGE’S STABILITY CONTROLLERUploaded byIAEME Publication
- THE EFFECTS OF AIR-FUEL RATIO ON AUTOMOBILES VIBRATIONSUploaded byIAEME Publication
- AN INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY MAGNIFIED TRANSLATION OF KM IDEALS ON K-ALGEBRAUploaded byIAEME Publication
- A NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND VALIDATION STUDY OF THE MATHEMATICALMODEL OF DROPLET FORMATION IN DROP ONDEMAND INKJET PRINTER AND THE EFFECT OF RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF POLYMERINK FOR AUTOMOBILE LIGHTING APPLICATIONUploaded byIAEME Publication
- DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS NOTES ON WRAPPED EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTIONUploaded byIAEME Publication
- ANALYZING FACTORS INFLUENCING INDUSTRIAL COMPETITIVENESS OF THAI SILVER JEWELRY INDUSTRY USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESSUploaded byIAEME Publication
- FATIGUE PERFORMANCE OF THERMAL SPRAY COATINGS ON CARBON STEEL: A REVIEWUploaded byIAEME Publication
- INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT CUTTER HELIX ANGLE AND CUTTING CONDITION ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS DURING END-MILLING OF C45 STEELUploaded byIAEME Publication
- A LITERATURE REVIEW ON PROCESSING AND TESTING OF MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF HYBRID COMPOSITESUSING GRAPHENE/EPOXY WITH ALUMINAUploaded byIAEME Publication
- SCIENTOMETRICS AS ANINSTRUMENT OF SOCIAL STRATIFICATION IN RUSSIAN SCIENCE AND HIGHER EDUCATIONUploaded byIAEME Publication
- ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCECORRELATION OF SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF TIRE AND VEHICLEUploaded byIAEME Publication
- A STUDY ON PREFERENCES OF FEMALE CUSTOMERS IN THE PURCHASE DECISION OF CARS IN CHENNAIUploaded byIAEME Publication
- MODELLING AND ANALYSIS OF ROTOR BRAKING SYSTEMUploaded byIAEME Publication
- THE INFLUENCE OF THECATHODE SHAPE ON THE PHASE COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE DURING OXIDATIONUploaded byIAEME Publication
- MEASUREMENT OF POWERCONSUMPTION PARAMETERS IN THE PRESENCE OF HIGH HARMONICSUploaded byIAEME Publication
- EVALUATIONOF IMPLEMENTATIONOF HEALTH AND SAFETYININDUSTRYANDVOCATIONAL SCHOOL IN YOGYAKARTA SPECIAL REGIONUploaded byIAEME Publication
- COMPARISON OF THE DIFFERENT WAYS OF THE BALL BOND WORK INDEX DETERMININGUploaded byIAEME Publication
- THE EFFECT OF BUDGETARY PARTICIPATION, DIFFICULTY LEVEL AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ON THE PERFORMANCE OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALSUploaded byIAEME Publication
- METHODS OF INCREASING THE ABSORPTION CAPACITY OF METALS TO IR RADIATION BY CREATING A SURFACE COMPOSITE LAYER SATURATED WITH NANOMATERIALSUploaded byIAEME Publication

- Example 6 _ Plane Areas in Rectangular Coordinates _ Integral Calculus ReviewUploaded byimrancenakk
- Mvfl_part3 Cvpr2012 Spatio-temporal and Higher-Order Feature LearningUploaded byzukun
- CG10-HMMUploaded byOr Kamara
- SAT Algebra Marwa Issa.docxUploaded byYara Youssef
- A course in Differential Geometry Thierry AubinUploaded byeagle9797
- CircleUploaded byAjinkya Patil
- CBSE 2014 Question Paper for Class 12 Mathematics - Outside DelhiUploaded byaglasem
- fdeUploaded byStergios Intzes
- 135614_Optimization Techniques.pptUploaded byRexy Wattpad
- CpE646-9v3.pdfUploaded byGurpreet Singh
- SOLPROB4eUploaded bySilvio Paula
- CSIR UGC NET Model Question Papers Mathematical SciencesUploaded byShiksha Portal
- Pauls Online Notes _ Calculus I - Business ApplicationsUploaded bynmmng2011
- Midterm 1 Sol - APSC 174Uploaded byJuan Pablo J
- CN3121_Group37Uploaded byAbhishek Intersect Aravind
- Devoir 1Uploaded byMelania Nitu
- Applications of Differential Calculus Exercise.docUploaded byIsmail Hashim
- Arithmetic Sequences and ExamplesUploaded byJonalyn Bautista-Canlas
- Transformations Worksheet.pdfUploaded bymeanangel4
- Transforms of DerivativesUploaded byAdam
- CaccettaUploaded byLucciano Salas
- Adding and Subtracting Polynomials WorksheetUploaded byNikolaMuriepGabaDeGuzman
- Optimal Control Theory Applications to management science and economicsUploaded bySilvio Paula
- Multi Variable Loop ShapingUploaded byHakan Ertuğrul
- PnC - Question & Sol 11-20Uploaded byTejashwi Kumar
- Algorithma LuhnUploaded byyantisofiana
- l07Uploaded byAmbrose Onueseke
- Chapter-1 Number SystemUploaded byAkashGaurav
- Non Euclidean AnalysisUploaded byDan Hanson
- Matrix Simplex MethodUploaded byAlfredo