You are on page 1of 3

Jump to Navigation TRADITIONAL VALUES HAVE SERVED INDIA S POWERFUL FAMILY BUSINESSES WELL FOR GENERAT IONS, BUT

IS THE NEED FOR MODERNISATION NOW TOO STRONG TO IGNORE? POSTED BY CIMA ON THU, 19/09/2013 - 15:47 Traditional values have served India s powerful family businesses well for generati ons, but is the need for modernisation now too strong to ignore? The Indian model of family-controlled business dynasties, often spanning a dizzy ing range of industries, shows few signs of dying out. About 90 per cent of the nation s enterprises are family affairs, from behemoths s uch as Tata and Reliance Industries right down the food chain to SMEs and microbusinesses. Even as India s economy has grown, modernised and become more closely integrated w ith the rest of the world over the past two decades, this model has changed litt le. While family firms are often seen in the West as something of an anachronism, in India they remain the lifeblood of the economy. One of the main factors behind the durability of the family-owned business is th at the ancient bonds of kinship and caste remain powerful forces in India. These serve to ensure that commercial skills and expertise continue to be passed down from one generation to the next. Many of India s most successful business empires come from tight-knit communities such as the Baniya and Marwari trading clans from the western desert states of R ajasthan and Gujarat. Both India s richest man and India s richest expatriate Mukesh Ambani of Reliance an d London-based steel tycoon Lakshmi Mittal are Marwaris. If caste and community ties help to explain why families have become important r epositories of business know-how in India, what explains their fondness for cong lomerates? One reason is that many of these enterprises have expanded into new areas becaus e vertical integration has been the easiest way for them to prosper. India s soft state throws up endless challenges. Court decisions can take decades, contracts are hard to enforce, infrastructure is weak and red tape is a constan t problem. In an environment where so little can be taken for granted, becoming self-suffic ient and developing internal economies that enable groups to operate with the mi nimum of external interference is an obvious answer. Is there any likelihood that the family model will diminish in influence as the country suffers its worst economic slump in over a decade? Not according to Praveen Chakravarty, chief executive of Mumbai-based investment bank Anand Rathi, who knows many of the most prominent families well. During a downturn the resilience of a family-owned business is actually far super ior to that of a conventional plc, he says. The element of continuity is almost taken for granted in a family business, so th ere s no question of changing management or selling up when times are tough as the re would be in the West. Instead, the focus automatically goes on managing costs

. This approach has helped many Indian families to retain control of their compani es through the ups and downs of multiple economic cycles. For all its benefits, the model does have a particular flaw when it comes to suc cession planning and the division of assets when a new generation assumes contro l. Sibling rivalry even has the potential to rip apart businesses that have taken d ecades to build. The death of Dhirubhai Ambani, the founder of Reliance, in 2002, for example, le d to one of the most notorious family feuds in Indian business history. One solution is to adopt more modern codes of corporate governance and develop m ore professional managers. With rich Indian families increasingly sending their sons and daughters to study and work overseas before returning home to run the family firm, it s a trend that s likely to grow. Illustration: Lyndon Hayes/Dutch Uncle 19/09/2013 Image Robin Pagnamenta South Asia editor of The Times Post a comment: All comments on FM digital are moderated. Your name: * E-mail: * Homepage: Comment: * Comments (0) Previous: Thinking: What can accountants gain from applying the principles of pr agmatic constructivism? MOST POPULAR Jobs needed for sustainable growth Building Royal Navy nuclear submarines Better, not more, reporting required Investors block auditor concentration Is your CV selling you short? Ads by Webexp EnhancedAd Options Ads not by this site ARTICLE CATEGORIES Business ethics [11] Career talk [104] Corporate finance [30] Law and regulation [8] Management accounting [94] Networking and social [2] Professional development [21]

Reporting and Governance [5] Risk management [4] Strategic management-economics [18] Studying CIMA [15] Sustainability [11] Technology [21] Studying Exam E1 [4] Studying Exam E2 [4] Studying Exam E3 [3] Studying Exam F1 [7] Studying Exam F2 [6] Studying Exam F3 [5] Studying Exam P1 [7] Studying Exam P2 [17] Studying Exam P3 [5] Studying Exam T4 [5] Studying Exam C02 [0] Studying Exam C03 [3] Financial Management HomeArchive News Cima NewsGlobal NewsFeatures Q&AIn DepthThe ListI worked on...Info Graphic The DataPrime NumberYour Questions Cima Vs...You AskedHot Potato!Comment PresidentEditorCEOGuest OpinionStudy Centre Course notesMastercoursesMore resourcesJob of the Month CIMA Home Study with us Students Members Employers Education partners Events and CPD courses Accredited CPD products Thought leadership 2013 CIMA AccessibilitySitemapPrivacy policyTerms & conditionsIssue Archive Words Ads by Webexp EnhancedAd Options Ads not by this site Ads by Webexp EnhancedAd Options