You are on page 1of 5

LAW 2106 Law of Business Organistaions

Assignment template Semester 2 2013

Name: Student number: Word count (without footnotes) (maximum allowed 2000): State any approved extension date and attach the course leaders approval:

University of Southern Queensland

MARKING CRITERIA FOR LAW2106 ASSIGNMENT Criteria Quality of analysis and problem-solving skills: Identifies legal issue/problem F No clear identification of legal issues relevant to the case and/or issues identified are not relevant. Lack of relevant legal principles or those identified are incorrect C Identifies at least one legal issue relevant to the case but more detail is required. Outlines some relevant legal principles but citation of applicable cases and/or statutory provisions needs more detail. Stated conclusion is broadly aligned with the question and ties together some legal arguments for the application of legal principles. 4-5 Evidence of some original research B Identifies most legal issues relevant to the case but lacks clarity. Outlines some relevant legal principles, citing applicable cases and/or statutory provisions. Stated conclusion broadly answers the question, and ties together some legal arguments for and against the application of particular legal principles. 6 Evidence of original research from a number of different sources A Correctly identifies most legal issues relevant to the case. Outlines all relevant legal principles, citing applicable cases and/or statutory provisions. Stated conclusion answers the question and ties together most the legal arguments for and against the application of particular legal principles. 7-8 Evidence of a high level of original research HD Correctly identifies all legal issues relevant to the case. Outlines all relevant legal principles, citing applicable cases and/or statutory provisions. Stated conclusion answers the question, and logically ties together the legal arguments for and against the application of particular legal principles. 9-10 Evidence of a high level of original research which enhances application and analysis

Evaluates relevant legal principles

Develops logical conclusion

Stated conclusion is not aligned with the question fails to tie together legal arguments either for or against the application of legal principles.

10 Marks Quality of research skills: Research

0-3 Little or no evidence of original research

Citation and referencing

Quality of communication skills:

5 Marks Writing style, grammar and spelling

Structure also including brief introduction, body and brief conclusion 5 Marks

Many errors and/or little or no attempt made at referencing 0 Inappropriate style, tone and/or choice of language or many errors of spelling and/or grammar. Poor structure and/or use of paragraphs or headings

Mostly accurate some minor errors 1 Mostly appropriate style, tone and/or choice of language. Spelling and grammar mostly accurate. Mostly appropriate structure and/or some use of paragraphs or headings to enhance readability 2-3

Consistently correct

2 3-4 Appropriate style, tone and/or choice of language. Accurate spelling and grammar.

Appropriate structure and use of paragraphs or headings

5 Highly appropriate style, tone and/or choice of language. Spelling and grammar consistently accurate. Excellent structure and use of paragraphs or headings

0-1

5
University of Southern Queensland

Question 1 (20 marks) Write Maximum of 1000 word answer here:

University of Southern Queensland

Question 2 (20 marks) Write Maximum of 1000 word answer here:

University of Southern Queensland

REFERENCES:

University of Southern Queensland