Professional Documents
Culture Documents
indicate otherwise. Mattfiews has been fully aware for years that the Ontario Associa-
line health care professionals from speaking out. Yet she has alone nothing about it. Why? I'd suggest it isbecause Mattlews realizes tfris clause has enableil the Ontario Association
of Community Care Access Centres, community care access cenEes, the Ministry of HeaItI, and
Ontario is expanding
home care
I take issue
unopposed. This unilateral access to the media is simply wrong. In the spAit offair anil balanceil coverage, I am therefore requesting that the Mhistry of Health, t]Ie Ontar.io Association of Communisages
Matthews insists Ontarians are getting better value for theA tax dollars in home care. She touts the
evialence.
So, Matthews linally seems to admitting tlat care co-ordination, although necessary is not
from eq)ressing their points of view in the media until such time as this unconstitutional media clause is removedfrom these access centres' contracts. Either al1 stakeholders' perspectives regarding home care
should be heard, or none ofthem.
Sue
be
Willidms
iona I t h er d.pist
Occ u p at
direct care, and this function should be kept to what is minimally essential in oriler to ensure maximum dollars reach front-line
service providers. But ifso, how can she brag about value to taxpayers when currently for every community caxe access centre douar spent on
Cuelph
dtect
And wh5r then, does Matthews allow tfre Ontario Association of Community Care Access Centres
to alisseminate the knowingly false statistic that more tfran 91.3 cents ofevery commuiity care access centre 4ollar is spent on direct care? What bothers me tire most is
ofdoing