You are on page 1of 25

This document downloaded from

vulcanhammer.net
since 1997, your source for engineering information for the deep foundation and marine construction industries, and the historical site for Vulcan Iron Works Inc. Use subject to the “fine print” to the right.

All of the information, data and computer software ("information") presented on this web site is for general information only. While every effort will be made to insure its accuracy, this information should not be used or relied on for any specific application without independent, competent professional examination and verification of its accuracy, suitability and applicability by a licensed professional. Anyone making use of this information does so at his or her own risk and assumes any and all liability resulting from such use. The entire risk as to quality or usability of the information contained within is with the reader. In no event will this web page or webmaster be held liable, nor does this web page or its webmaster provide insurance against liability, for any damages including lost profits, lost savings or any other incidental or consequential damages arising from the use or inability to use the information contained within. This site is not an official site of Prentice-Hall, the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Vulcan Foundation Equipment or Vulcan Iron Works Inc. (Tennessee Corporation). All references to sources of equipment, parts, service or repairs do not constitute an endorsement.

Don’t forget to visit our companion site http://www.vulcanhammer.org

UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002

UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC)

DESIGN: GENERAL BUILDING REQUIREMENTS

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED

S. /1/) Change No. Date Location .. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (Preparing Activity) AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER SUPPORT AGENCY Record of Changes (changes are indicated by \1\ . Use of the copyrighted material apart from this UFC must have the permission of the copyright holder.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) DESIGN: GENERAL BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Any copyrighted material included in this UFC is identified at its point of use.. U.

Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC). P. and the DoD Field Activities in accordance with USD(AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002.17. Engineering and Construction Division U. Army Corps of Engineers A h Z t % & IEsoL Kathleen I. Technical content of UFC is the responsibility of the cognizant DoD working group. AUTHORIZED BY: Dwight A Beranek. and Air Force Civil Engineer Support Agency (AFCESA) are responsible for administration of the UFC system. P.188//report/doc ufc.@i. UFC are living documents and will be periodically reviewed.E. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE). restoration. updated. P Deputy Civil Engineer Deputy Chief of Staff.204. Recommended changes with supporting rationale should be sent to the respective service proponent office by the following electronic form: Criteria Change Request (CCR). Chief. Construction Criteria Base (CCB) system maintained by the National Institute of Building Sciences at Internet site http//www.navfac.S.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 FOREWORD The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system as prescribed by MIL-STD 3007. The form is also accessible from the Internet sites listed below.hnd.mil/techinfo/index.htm.org/ccb. Defense agencies should contact the preparing service for document interpretation and improvements. the Defense Agencies. UFC are distributed only in electronic media from the following sources: Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) Index http://65.html.navymil. Ferguson. . 0 0 Hard copies of UFC printed from electronic media should be checked against the current electronic version prior to use to ensure that they are current.E. sustainment. UFC will be used for all service projects and work for other customers where appropriate. and made available to users as part of the Services’ responsibility for providing technical criteria for military construction. NAVFAC Engineering Innovation and Criteria Office Internet site http://criteria.S. U.E. Headquarters. provides planning. and modernization criteria. construction.nibs. Installations & Logistics Department of the Air Force Director of Analysis & Investment Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment Department of Defense . design. USACE TECHINFO Internet site http://www.armv.usace. and applies to the Military Departments. UFC are effective upon issuance.

3 Chapter 2 . In the case of conflicts between the model code and military criteria. For fire protection and life safety requirements. 1-6. 1-4 IMPLEMENTATION. refer to *MIL-HDBK-1008C. It is DOD policy to select the best model code provisions and industry standards for military use. safety. However. This UFC provides guidance for the use of model building codes for design and construction of Department of Defense (DOD) facilities. improve competition. requires Federal use of private sector consensus standards wherever practicable.4 Chapter 3 . increase timeliness and cost effectiveness. 1-3 POLICY. Design and Construction.DEFINITIONS. Use Chapter 3 and *MIL-HDBK-1008/C. Technical portions of the code are applicable as modified herein. 1-5 STRUCTURE OF THE UFC. The use of industry standards for DOD projects is intended to promote communication in the marketplace. and represent minimum standards that must be met by the private-sector construction industry. Public Law 104-113.1 Fire Protection and Life Safety. This UFC is effective immediately.USE AND OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. The goal of the law is to reduce reliance on Federal standards by using industry standards when there is potential to simplify contracting. Fire Protection for Facilities Engineering. and general welfare. and promote the safety and welfare of users. Delete. The administrative portions of the code are not applicable to the military construction process. 1-6. This UFC will be revised to address new and updated industry standards as they become available. 1-6. and result in cost savings. use military requirements.2 Chapter 1 . 1-6 MODIFICATIONS.ADMINISTRATION. standards and guide specifications by all DOD components.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 INTRODUCTION 1-1 PURPOSE. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995. Definitions apply to terms used in the model codes and are not intended to replace definitions and terms in military documents. The IBC has 35 chapters and 10 appendices that contain both technical and administrative provisions. This UFC references IBC 2000 and other government and nongovernment standards and criteria. 1-2 AUTHORITY. The IBC 2000 provisions are directed toward public health. 1-6. Paragraph 1-6 provides modifications to IBC 2000 and is structured around its format. Model building codes must be used as a basis of future development of criteria. the military often requires higher standards to achieve more stringent life-cycle performance. 1-1 . Modifications to the model code provisions contained herein are based upon those unique military requirements. or to construct facilities that do not exist in the private sector.

Delete “the International Mechanical Code and the International Fire Code” and substitute “Unified Facility Criteria documents. Use *MIL-HDBK-1008/C.MEANS OF EGRESS. 1-6.8 chapter. Unified Facility Guide Specifications and military criteria and guidance documents. 414 and 415.3.2 and 1206. Delete the last sentence and substitute “Combustion air shall be obtained from attic areas only in accordance with Unified Facility Criteria documents.4 Paragraph 1203.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 1-6. Chapter 10 .13. regardless of building height.10 1-6.6 Chapter 5 .2. Subparagraph 4.3 Paragraph 1202. Unified Facility Guide Specifications and military criteria and guidance documents.2.SPECIAL DETAILED REQUIREMENTS BASED ON USE AND OCCUPANCY. Use this chapter.3.9 1008/C.1.7 1-6.1.INTERIOR ENVIRONMENT.5 Chapter 4 . including the exception.13.ACCESSIBILITY. the area limitations in Table 503 may be increased by 300 percent for Air Force facilities when an approved automatic sprinkler system is installed. Delete. Use this Chapter 8 . 412. Delete “in accordance with the International Energy Conservation Code.4.13. 1-6.1. 1-6.” 1-6.3. 1-6.11 Chapter 6 – TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION.2 Paragraph 1202.1 Paragraph 1202.” 1-6. Chapter 7 – FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED CONSTRUCTION.” 1-6. Unified Facility Guide Specifications and military criteria and guidance documents. 1-6. and substitute “Temperature control shall be in accordance with Unified Facility Criteria documents.2. Delete and replace with the following: 1-2 . Use *MIL-HDBK-1008/C. 1-6. Refer to applicable DOD and individual military service standards. Delete Sections 412.INTERIOR FINISHES.” 1-6. Refer to *MIL-HDBK-1008/C for limitations on the use of Table 503. Use Chapter 8 and *MIL-HDBKChapter 9 – FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS.12 Chapter 11 . In Section 506.13 Chapter 12 .5 Paragraphs 1206.13.GENERAL BUILDING HEIGHTS AND AREAS. 1-6.13.2. Delete Chapter 11 and use the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS) and the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities (ADAAG).

Roofing and Waterproofing Manual and UFGS Division 7 Thermal and Moisture Protection for technical criteria. 52 65 Bedrooms. glazing area.7 Paragraph 1207.” 1-6. See ASTM E336-97.ROOF ASSEMBLIES AND ROOFTOP STRUCTURES. Design Criteria for guidance for air infiltration.EXTERIOR WALLS. Circulation) Habitable Wet Areas (Kitchen. Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of Sound Transmission Loss of Building Partition Elements. In addition. See ASTM E1007-97. The services define their own parameters for dwelling units. Use Army Technical Instruction 80001. Use Chapter 15 for basic guidance and NRCA. Federal Regulations and other mandates regarding energy use. These requirements are reflected in criteria and standards used by each military service. and moisture migration pertaining to exterior wall systems. 1-6. Laundry.Air-borne Sound = 50 STC.3. 45 FSTC ASTM E 90-99.13.6 Paragraph 1207.” 1-6. Compliance with Unified Facility Criteria documents.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 Table 1-1 Sound Transmission Standards for Party Walls and Floor/Ceiling Construction Area FSTC 1 FIIC 2 Party Walls (unit Separation) 52 Primary Habitable Areas (Living. Bath. 1-6. IBC. conservation and efficiency standards. Utility. Dining. Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of Sound Transmission Through Floor-Ceiling Assemblies Using the Tapping Machine.16 Chapter 15 . Standard Test Method for Field Measurement of Tapping Machine Impact sound Through Floor-Ceiling Assemblies and Associated Support Structure. Delete Chapter 13 and replace with “Federal facilities are required to comply with Public Laws. Family Room. Equipment) 52 57 Habitable Areas Over Garages 52 Note 1 Field Sound Transmission Class. Executive Orders. Note 2 Field Impact Isolation Class. Delete and replace with following: “Use the latest DoD approved minimum sizes for barracks and dormitory rooms.4. The use of any 1-3 .ENERGY EFFICIENCY. Unified Facility Guide Specifications and military criteria documents will ensure that facilities meet all applicable mandates. the military has other unique requirements to ensure the planning. Delete. 1-6.15 Chapter 14 .14 Chapter 13 .Structure-borne Sound = 50 IIC. Standard Test Method for Measurement of Airborne Sound Insulation in Buildings. design and construction of energy efficient. IBC. 45 FIIC ASTM E 492-90.13. cost effective facilities that meet mission requirements.

For this analysis. In addition.2. These facilities will require. Use Chapter 17 and the requirements in the Unified Facilities Guide Specifications. NAVFAC DM-2.2. in addition to the requirements of Chapter 16.7. 1-6.3.22 Chapter 21 – MASONRY. nonlinear design procedures may be required for these facilities according to Paragraph 5-4. Use Chapter 16 in its entirety with the following revisions: 1-6.” 1-6.2. Structural Plastics. with no redundant back-up facility on.17.2 Paragraph 1622. Additional requirements provided by the design agency will take precedence. and/or house mission-essential functions. Chapter 21 supercedes Army TM 5-809-3. 1-6. as defined in Table 1604. Concrete.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 asbestos containing materials in roofing products such as mastics.b of TI 809-04.) 1-6. Masonry. Buildings classified as Seismic Use Group III. Design Criteria for Earthquake Hazard Mitigation of Navy Piers and Wharves. Also use supplemental requirements in UFGS Division 2. is prohibited.5.18 Chapter 17 – STRUCTURAL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS. 1-6. Aluminum Structures.19 Chapter 18 – SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS. E. and UFGS Division 3.9. Chapter 20 supersedes MIL-HDBK1002/6.20 Chapter 19 – CONCRETE. or F. Use Chapter 19. Use Chapter 18 for basic guidance and ***DM 7. 1-4 . 1-6.17 Chapter 16 – STRUCTURAL DESIGN. 1-6.17. Mission-essential functions are those absolutely critical to mission continuation of the activity. 1-6. For Section 1802. Use Chapter 20 and UFGS 05500 (Navy or Army as appropriate) Miscellaneous Metals. Replace the second sentence with the following: “The seismic design of Navy piers and wharves will be according to the Technical Report TR-2069-SHR. AFM 88-3.or offsite. 1-6. Composite Structures. Chapter 19 supersedes MIL-HDBK 1002/4. felts.1 Paragraph 1616. Site Work.4 All inhabited buildings must meet the requirements of **UFC 4-010-01. a linear elastic analysis utilizing ‘m’ factors in accordance with the requirements contained in the Technical Instruction TI 809-04 Seismic Design for Buildings.3. DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings.17. and FiberReinforced Composites.21 Chapter 20 – ALUMINUM.3 Use Appendices B and C for design at locations outside of CONUS. etc. Concrete Structures. and within Seismic Design Category D. as defined by paragraph 1616.17.3. the foundation and soils investigation requirements are provided as a minimum. (The classification of a building as Seismic Use Group III should only be used for essential facilities that are required for post-earthquake recovery. Use Chapter 21 and UFGS Division 4. use the applicable ground motion and design procedures as defined in TI 809-04. Foundations and Earth Structures for detailed requirements. require enhanced performance objectives for earthquake response.

Use Chapter 24 and MIL-HDBK1013/12. and Forced Entry Tactics for force protection. Chapter 23 supersedes MIL-HDBK 1002/5. Timber Structures. Masonry Structural Design for Buildings. At edges of openings.JT Width (in) 3/8 1/2 3/4 1 (MAX) W x in 3/16 1/4 3/8 1/2 Max. (d) The spacing will be reduced approximately 50% near masonry-bonded corners or other similar conditions where one end of the masonry panel is restrained. d. At other points of stress concentration.24 Chapter 23 – WOOD. e. and “U”-shaped buildings at approximately 6 to 10 ft) from corners. Recommended vertical BEJ locations. 1-6. At regular intervals as noted in table above. Metals.GLASS AND GLAZING. Wood and Plastics.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 Chapter 3. concrete masonry in intermediate humidity conditions (ASTM C 90). (c) L is the horizontal distance between control joints. The recommended spacing may be increased 6 ft in humid climates and decreased 6 ft in arid climates. The designer should adjust the control joint spacing for local conditions. (b) Joint reinforcement will be cold-drawn deformed wire with a minimum 9-gauge longitudinal wire size. Spacing of BEJs (a) 22 30 44 60 (a) Provide expansion joints at 6 to 10 ft from corners. brick and concrete masonry units (CMU) are normally not available in metric sizes. Use Chapter 23 and UFGS Division 6. (a) Table 1-3 Maximum Spacing of Vertical Expansion Joints in Brick Walls. Chapter 22 supersedes MIL-HDBK 1002/3. Because the Masonry Society has a waiver for use of metric products. At changes in wall height or thickness c. Use Chapter 22 and UFGS Division 5. 1-6. Near wall intersections in “L”. H is generally the vertical distance between structural supports. 1-5 . 1-6. Table 1-2 Recommended Joint Control Spacing(a) Vertical Spacing Of Joint Reinforcement With 2-#9 Wires(b) (in) None (e) 16 8 Maximum Ratio Of Panel Length To Wall Height (L/H)(c) 2 3 4 Maximum Spacing Of Control Joints (d) (ft) 18 24 30 Based on moisture-controlled.25 Chapter 24 . type I. Bomb. Give special attention to control cracking in concrete masonry structures using the guidance contained in Tables 1-2 and Table 1-3. ∆T=1000F EXP. Structural Engineering Steel Structures. b. (e) Not recommended for walls exposed to view where control of cracking is important. Evaluation and Selection Analysis of Security Glazing for Protection Against Ballistic. a. “T”.23 Chapter 22 – STEEL.

water conserving and cost effective facilities are provided that meet mission requirements and are in compliance with Public Laws. Use entire chapter except Sections 3107 and 3108.35 Chapter 34 . cost effective facilities are provided that meet mission requirements and are in compliance with Public Laws. Appendixes A. B. 1-6.SIGNS.29 Chapter 28 – MECHANICAL SYSTEMS. Use the chapter. Delete.26 Chapter 25 – GYPSUM BOARD AND PLASTER. Delete Appendix H. D. Unified Facility Guide Specifications and military criteria and guidance documents. Delete Section 2801 and substitute “Mechanical appliances. designed and constructed in accordance with the Unified Facility Criteria documents. Use ASCE 11-99 to conduct structural condition assessment of existing buildings prior to major additions. 1-6. 1-6. Federal Regulations and similar mandates. Delete and use NFPA 70. 1-6. E.31 Chapter 30 – ELEVATORS AND CONVEYING SYSTEMS.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 1-6. Use this chapter.1 and substitute “Plumbing appliances.SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION. 1-6.ENCROACHMENT INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. ITG 01-01. equipment and systems shall be planned. This will ensure energy efficient. National Electrical Code. 1-6. 1-6 .28 Chapter 27 – ELECTRICAL.” 1-6.36 1-6. Follow the requirements of ADAAG and individual signage publications for each military service. Executive Orders. Interim Technical Guidance Elevator Design supersedes Chapter 30 wherever applicable. Executive Orders. Unified Facility Guide Specifications and military criteria and guidance documents. designed and constructed in accordance with Unified Facility Criteria documents.32 Chapter 31 .EXISTING STRUCTURES.SAFEGUARDS DURING CONSTRUCTION.30 Chapter 29 – PLUMBING SYSTEMS.38 Appendix H . Use this chapter and applicable UFGS.27 Chapter 26 – PLASTIC.” 1-6. equipment and systems shall be planned. This will ensure energy efficient.34 Chapter 32 .33 Delete.REFERENCED STANDARDS. G. National Fuel Gas Code. 1-6.37 Chapter 35 . and J. alterations or repairs. 1-6. 1-6. Federal Regulations and similar mandates. Delete. Chapter 33 . Also comply with NFPA 54. Delete Paragraph 2901. Delete entire chapter and refer to *MIL-HDBK-1008/C and ASCE 11-99. Guidelines for Structural Condition Assessment of Existing Buildings.

mil/criteria http:/www. For questions.) MIL-HDBK-1013/12. Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings. TR-2069-SHR. Unified Facilities Criteria http:/criteria.army.mil/techinfo/ind ex. Fire Protection for Facilities Engineering. Seismic A-1 .asp 2. February 1987. Contact your government sponsor if required.navy. Foundations and Earth Structures. Huntsville. U. Design and Construction. Design Criteria Technical Instruction 809-04. Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) 1510 Gilbert Street Norfolk. 3.navfac.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 APPENDIX A REFERENCES GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS: 1. 35816 Technical Instruction 800-01.2. Interim Technical Guidance Elevator Design *MIL-HDBK-1008C. (This Design Manual is due to be replaced by UFC 3-220-01.navfac.navy.mil **UFC 4-010-01.) ITG 01-01. For questions.) Technical Report.hnd. (Will be replaced by UFC 3600-01.usace. Fire Protection for Facilities Engineering. Design and Construction. (Restricted access. please contact the preparing activity. For questions. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 4820 University Square.nfesc. Evaluation and Selection Analysis of Security Glazing for Protection Against Ballistic.mil/criteria http://www. and Forced Entry Tactics. Design Criteria for Earthquake Hazard mitigation of Navy Piers and Wharves.) ***DM 7. September 2002. please contact the preparing activity. Geotechnical Engineering by the end of calendar year 2002. Al. VA 23511-2669 http://criteria. please contact the preparing activity.S. (This UFC is due to be published 1 Aug 2002.navy. Bomb.

National Fuel Gas Code International Building Code (IBC) 2000 . http://www.asp Considerations for Metal Roofing Technical Instruction 809-53.intlcode.O.army. Structural ex.usace.access-board. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS) Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines for Building and Facilities (ADAAG) NON-GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS: 1. Box 9101 Quincy.gov Telephone (202) 512-1530 Toll Free (888) 293-6498 Fax (202) 512-1262 5. National Electrical Code NFPA 54.nfpa. Standard Test Method A-2 NFPA 70. Suite 600 Falls Church.htm 6. http://www.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 Design for Buildings http://www.access-board/adaag/ html/adaag. MA 02269-9101 (617) 770-3000 www. PA 19428-2959 ASTM E336-97.org 3.hnd. ASTM International 100 Barr Harbor Drive PO Box C700 West Conshohocken. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) gpoaccess@gpo.org/ 2. International Code Council (ICC) 5203 Leesburg Pike. Commentary on Roofing Systems 4.mil/techinfo/ind Technical Instruction 809-29. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1 Batterymarch Park P. Standard Test Method for Measurement of Airborne Sound Insulation in Buildings ASTM E1007-97.htm Public Law 104-113.gov/ufas/ufashtml/ufas. VA 22041 (703) 931-4533 (703) 379-1546 fax http://www.

American Society of Civil Engineers 1801 Alexander Bell Drive Reston.org UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 for field Measurement of Tapping Machine Impact Sound Through Floor-Ceiling Assemblies and Associated Support Structure ASTM E90-99. Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of Sound Transmission Loss of Building Partition Elements. Guidelines for Structural Condition Assessment of Existing Buildings. Virginia 20191-4400 1-800-548-2723 toll free (703) 295-6300 international (703) 295-6222 fax (703) 295-6444 faxback http://www. 2001 A-3 . National Roofing Contractors Association (NRCA) 10255 W.nrca. Suite 600. ASCE 11-99. IL 60018 (847) 299-9070.www. e-mail nrca@nrca. ASTM E492-90. fax (847) 299-1183.net http://www.asce. Roofing and Waterproofing Manual. Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of Sound Transmission Loss Through Floor-Ceiling Assemblies Using the Tapping Machine 4. Higgins Road.net/ ASCE 7.astm. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. Rosemont. 5th Edition.org 5.

Japan Tokyo. Guam Keflavik. Germany Grafenwoehr. Australia Chievres. Iceland Vicenzia. Belgium Manama. Germany Heidelberg. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures) ID Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Woomera. Greece Thule. Japan Naha. Germany Hanau. Japan Atsugi. Bahrain Guantanamo Bay. Greenland Agana Fleet Activities. Germany Landstuhl. Japan Iwakuni. Italy La Maddalena. Germany Wuerzburg. Guam Agana Ship Repair. Germany Crete. Italy Naples. Japan Misawa. Cuba Copenhagen. Japan Ground Frost Snow Load Penetration (PSF) (in) 0 15 0 0 25 0 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 30 25 25 5 25 0 0 0 25 35 20 20 20 20 35 15 0 10 0 0 0 40 10 10 20 0 25 5 5 35 5 40 30 30 20 35 5 25 50 40 35 5 255 5 (1) 5(1) 5(1) 50 25 5 5 5 5 25 25(3) 10(3) 5(3) 5(3) 5(3) 5(3) 50(3) 5(3) 5(3) 25(3) Basic Wind Speed (MPH) 80 115 80 90 90 105 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 85 130 155(2) 155(2) 155(2) 110 80 80 80 80 80 80 120 120 110 110 110 110 110 110 100 120 B-1 . Germany Grefrath. Diego Garcia Stuttgart. Japan Koza City. Italy Sigonella. Germany Berchtesgaden. Italy Gaeta. Italy Atsugi. Italy Pordenone. Denmark Diego Garcia. Japan Sasebo. Japan Okinawa. Japan Sagamihara.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 APPENDIX B Wind Parameters (as published in ITG 01-2. Germany Spangdahlem. Germany Bad Kreuznach. Guam Agana Anderson AFB.

p. Panama 0 5 90 56 Panama Canal. England 15 10 85 66 London. Netherlands 15 20 80 51 Antarctica 30 190 105 52 Balboa. Portugal-Azores 0 5 120 58 Guaynaba. Puerto 0 5 140(5) Rico 62 Rota. Virgin Islands 0 5 140(6) Notes: (1) No frost in Guam or Diego Garcia. (4) Need to confirm large variance in frost penetration for Korea. Korea 20 50(4) 100 44 Uijongbu. England 15 15 100 71 Antigua. England 15 15 100 69 Lakenheath.ID Name Ground Frost Snow Load Penetration (PSF) (in) UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 Basic Wind Speed (MPH) 39 Yokosuka NCTC. Use ASCE value. B-2 . Puerto Rico 0 5 120(5) 60 Sabana Seca. Turkey 15 25 105 65 Southampton. Korea 20 45(4) 105 45 Seoul. Puerto Rico 0 5 120(5) 59 San Juan. 20 5(3) 110 Japan 42 Teague. Panama 0 5 90 54 Colon. Panama 0 5 110 53 Panama City. Panama 0 5 95 55 Galeta Island. (2) ASCE 7 recommends 170 m. Need to identify as minimum footing depth. Turkey 0 5 70 64 Diyarbakir. England 15 15 100 70 Mildenhall.h. Korea 20 15(4) 105 47 Kunsan. Korea 20 40(4) 110 43 Pyongtaek. England 15 25 85 68 Croughton. Japan 20 5(3) 110 41 Yokosuka Ship Repair.h. Korea 20 45(4) 105 46 Chinhae.p. Panama 0 5 110 57 Terceira. Spain 5 5 85 63 Adana. (6) ASCE 7 recommends 145 m. Korea 20 30(4) 100 48 Songtan. Korea 20 50(4) 95 49 Port Lyautey. (5) ASCE 7 recommends 145 m. Puerto Rico 0 5 120(5) 61 Roosevelt Roads. England 15 15 100 67 Edzell. Japan 20 5(3) 110 40 Yokosuka CFA. Use ASCE value.h.p. (3) Need to confirm large variance in frost penetration for Japan. Use ASCE value. Morocco 0 5 85 50 Schirmen.

06 0.06 0.06 0.56 C-1 .24 S1 0.06 0.06 1.56 0.06 1.06 0.06 0.24 0.24 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.56 0.06 0.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 APPENDIX C Seismic Parameters AFRICA ALGERIA ANGOLA Luanda BENIN Cotonou BOTSWANA Gaborone BURUNDI Bujumbura CAMEROON Douala Yaounde CAPE VERDE Praia CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC Bangui CHAD Ndjamena CONGO Brazzaville DJIBOUTI Djibouti EGYPT Alexandria Cairo Port Said EQUATORIAL GUINEA Malabo ETHIOPIA Addis Ababa Asmara GABON Libreville GAMBIA Banjul GHANA Accra GUINEA Bissau Conakry IVORY COAST Abidijan KENYA Nairobi 0.06 0.56 0.06 0.24 0.06 0.06 0.62 0.24 0.06 0.06 0.28 0.31 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.62 0.14 0.28 0.62 0.06 0.56 0.62 0.06 0.28 1.28 0.06 Alger Olan Ss 1.24 1.06 1.56 0.06 0.56 0.24 1.

06 0.06 0.62 0.06 0.28 0.06 0.62 0.31 0.31 0.06 0.28 C-2 .24 0.06 0.56 0.62 0.14 0.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 LESOTHO Maseru LIBERIA Monrovia LIBYA Tripoli Wheelus AFB MALAGASY REPUBLIC Tananarive MALAWI Blantyre Lilongwe Zomba MALI Bamako MAURITANIA Nouakchott MAURITIUS Port Louis MOROCCO Casablanca Port Lyautey Rabat Tangier MOZAMBIQUE Maputo NIGER Niamey NIGERIA Ibadan Kaduna Lagos REPUBLIC OF RWANDA Kigali SENEGAL Dakar SEYCHELLES Victoria SIERRA LEONE Freetown SOMALIA Mogadishu SOUTH AFRICA Cape Town Durban Johannesburg Natal Pretoria SWAZILAND Mbabane TANZANIA Dar es Salaam 0.62 0.24 0.06 1.24 1.28 0.28 0.24 1.14 0.06 0.06 0.62 0.06 0.24 0.62 0.62 0.06 0.06 0.24 0.06 0.28 1.28 0.28 0.14 0.06 0.06 0.28 0.06 0.62 0.56 0.31 0.56 0.06 0.62 0.06 0.06 0.62 0.62 1.56 0.06 0.28 0.06 0.28 0.06 1.56 0.06 0.06 0.56 0.28 0.

62 0.75 0.65 0.14 0.56 0.65 1.06 0.28 ASIA AFGHANISTAN Kabul BAHRAIN Manama BANGLADESH Dacca BRUNEI Bandar Seri Begawan BURMA Mandalay Rangoon CHINA Canton Chengdu Nanking Peking Shanghai Shengyang Tibwa Tsingtao Wuhan CYPRUS Nicosia HONG KONG Hong Kong INDIA Bombay Calcutta Madras New Delhi INDONESIA Bandung Jakarta Medan 1.65 1.65 0.06 0.14 0.56 0.65 1.06 0.62 0.75 0.62 0.28 1.65 1.75 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.62 1.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 Zanzibar TOGO Lome TUNISIA Tunis UGANDA Kampala UPPER VOLTA Ougadougou ZAIRE Bukavu Kinshasa Lubumbashi ZAMBIA Lusaka ZIMBABWE Harare 0.24 0.31 1.24 0.28 0.56 0.75 C-3 .62 0.10 1.24 1.62 1.62 1.56 0.28 0.28 1.56 0.56 0.31 0.56 0.28 1.28 0.24 0.62 0.24 0.28 1.56 0.14 1.28 0.24 0.56 0.24 0.75 0.24 0.62 0.75 0.28 0.56 1.06 0.31 0.62 0.56 0.24 0.

65 1.75 1.65 0.65 0.56 0.56 1.31 0.14 0.14 1.24 0.24 1.06 1.14 0.56 0.24 0.24 1.65 0.14 1.31 0.56 0.14 0.65 0.31 0.56 0.28 0.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 Surabaya IRAN Isfahan Shiraz Tabriz Tehran IRAQ Baghdad Basra ISRAEL Haifa Jerusalem Tel Aviv JAPAN Fukuoka Itazuke AFB Misawa AFB Naha.06 0.24 1.75 0.65 0.24 0.75 0.62 0. Okinawa Osaka/Kobe Sapporo Tokyo Wakkanai Yokohama Yakota JORDAN Amman KOREA Kwangju Kimhae Pusan Seoul KUWAIT Kuwait LAOS Vientiane LEBANON Beirut MALAYSIA Kuala Lumpur NEPAL Kathmandu OMAN Muscat PAKISTAN Islamabad Karachi Lahore Peshawar QUATAR Doha SAUDI ARABIA 0.31 0.06 0.56 0.68 1.75 C-4 .65 1.75 0.24 1.65 1.75 0.75 0.24 1.14 0.56 1.75 0.75 1.31 0.56 0.75 0.75 0.06 1.65 1.24 1.24 0.65 0.75 0.56 0.24 1.56 0.56 0.65 1.24 1.31 0.14 0.56 0.24 1.56 0.62 1.28 1.31 0.

31 0.75 0.14 1.75 1.31 0.14 0.06 0.31 0.75 0.62 0.56 0.24 0.24 0.56 0.65 0.62 0.56 1.06 0.14 0.62 0.06 0.06 1.24 0.62 0.24 1.65 1.56 0.24 0.06 0.06 ATLANTIC OCEAN AREA AZOREA All BURMUDA All 0.56 0.06 0.31 0.28 0.14 0.56 0.06 0.14 0.28 0.14 0.31 0.06 0.28 CARIBBEAN SEA BAHAMA ISLANDS All CUBA All DOMINICAN REPUBLIC Santo Domingo FRENCH WEST INDIES Martinique GRENADA Saint Georges 1.24 0.28 0.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 Al Batin Dhahran Jiddah Khamis Mushayf Riyadh SINGAPORE All SOUTH YEMEN Aden City SRI LANKA Colombo SYRIA Allepo Damascus TAIWAN All THAILAND Bangkok Chinmg Mai Dongkhia Udorn TURKEY Adana Ankara Istanbul Izmir Karamursel UNITED ARAB EMIRATES Abu Dhabi Dubai VIETNAM Ho Chi Minh City (Saigon) YEMEN ARAB REPUBLIC Sanaa 1.62 1.14 0.06 0.310.24 0.65 1.14 C-5 .31 0.56 0.31 0.06 0l.06 0.28 0.28 0.56 1.62 0.24 0.

56 1.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 HAITI Port au Prince JAMAICA Kingston LEEWARD ISLANDS All TRINADAD AND TOBAGO All 1.56 0.38 0.06 0.28 EUROPE ALBANIA Tirana AUSTRIA Salzburg Vienna BELGIUM Antwerp Brussels BULGARIA Sofia CZECH REPUBLIC Prague DENMARK Copenhagen 0.24 0.28 0.65 0.56 1.56 1.62 0.06 0.14 1.31 0.06 0.24 0.06 1.24 0.06 0.65 0.06 0.06 1.56 0.24 0.28 0.4 0.24 0.24 0.28 1.56 CENTAL AMERICA BELIZE Beimopan CANAL ZONE All COSTA RICA San Jose EL SALVADORE San Salvador GUATEMALA Guatemala HONDURAS Tegucigalpa NICARAGUA Managua PANAMA Colon Galeta Panama MEXICO Ciudad Juarez Guadalajara Hermosillo Matamoros Mazatlan Merida Mexico City Monterrey Nuevo Laredo Tijuana 0.14 0.56 1.62 0.75 12.24 0.75 1.56 0.24 0.56 0.26 0.83 1.56 1.75 1.24 0.31 0.62 1.24 1.14 0.28 0.24 0.56 1.24 0.28 0.65 0.24 0.56 0.06 0.62 0.28 0.56 0.56 C-6 .60 0.62 0.31 0.

75 0.75 0.31 0.24 0.06 1.28 0.75 0.65 0.24 1.40 0.27 0.65 1.62 0.56 0.28 0.31 1.06 0.24 0.62 0.24 0.62 0.21 0.14 0.75 0.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 FINLAND Helsinki FRANCE Bordeaux Lyon Marseille Nice Strasbourg GERMANY.62 1.14 0.28 0.28 0.56 0.56 0.62 0. FEDERAL REPUBLIC Berlin Bonn Bremen Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Munich Stuttgart Vaihigen GREECE Athens Kavalla Makri Rhodes Souda Bay Thessaloniki HUNGARY Budapest ICELAND Keflavik Reykjavik IRELAND Dublin ITALY Aviano AFG Brindisi Florence Gaeta Genoa La Maddalena Milan Naples Palermo Rome Sicily Trieste Turin LUXEMBOURG Luxembourg MALTA Valletta NETHERLANDS All 0.56 0.28 1.06 0.06 1.62 0.06 0.20 1.14 0.06 0.75 0.09 0.28 0.67 1.06 0.14 C-7 .24 1.50 1.06 0.24 1.65 1.28 0.62 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.56 0.28 0.62 0.0 1.65 0.56 0.56 0.06 0.31 0.62 0.31 0.22 0.06 0.62 0.28 0.06 0.56 0.28 0.65 1.24 0.62 0.24 0.56 0.14 1.06 0.24 0.

62 0.31 0.125 0.14 NORTH AMERICA GREENLAND All CANADA Argentina NAS Calgary.31 0.65 1.31 0.28 0.06 0.28 0.24 0.06 0.28 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.06 0.06 0.62 0.31 0.14 0.62 1.31 0.28 0.62 0.62 0.06 0. Man 0.62 0.14 0.06 0.31 0. Alb Churchill.56 0.14 0.56 1.31 0.20 0. Mawgan Thurso USSR Kiev Leningrad Moscow YUGOSLAVIA Belgrade Zagreb 0.14 0.31 0.75 0.56 0.06 0.28 0.30 0.31 0.06 0.31 0.06 0.06 0.62 0.31 0.28 0.24 0.28 1.14 0.62 0.28 0.025 0.14 0.14 0.24 0.14 0.14 0.06 0.14 0.28 0.28 SWEDEN Goteborg Stockholm SWITZERLAND Bern Geneva Zurich UNITED KINGDOM Belfast Edinburgh Edzell Glasgow/Renfrew Hamilton Liverpool London Londonderry St.75 0.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 NORWAY Oslo POLAND Krakow Poznan Waraszawa PORTUGAL Lisbon Oporto ROMANIA Bucharest SLOVAK REPUBLIC Bratislava SPAIN Barcelona Bilbao Madrid Rota Sevilla 0.62 0.14 C-8 .62 0.06 0.14 0.62 0.04 0.

06 0.24 0.06 1.06 0.06 0.06 0.14 0.62 1.31 0.28 0.24 0.56 0.06 0. Ont Frobisher N.75 0.31 0.31 0. Ont Vancouver Winnepeg.06 0.75 0.06 0. Harmon.06 0.06 0. Quebec Ottawa.56 1.56 0.31 0.06 0.06 1.14 0.24 0.06 0.06 0.65 1.31 0.31 0.56 0. Johns Nfld Toronto.25 0.31 0.24 0.75 1.06 0.14 0. Alb E.62 1.62 0.14 0.65 0. Man 0.06 0.06 0.31 0.75 0.28 0.W.75 0.06 0.75 0.65 1.28 0.14 0.06 0.14 0.31 1.06 0.14 C-9 .56 0.06 0.65 0.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 Cold Lake. Alb Edmonton.56 1.06 0.06 0.14 0.65 1.10 PACIFIC OCEAN AREA AUSTRALIA Brisbane Canberra Melbourne 0.24 0.31 1.65 0.14 0.24 0.31 0.14 SOUTH AMERICA ARGENTINA Buenos Aires BRAZIL Belem Belo Horizonte Brasilia Manaus Porto Allegre Recife Rio de Janeiro Salvador San Paulo BOLIVIA La Paz Santa Cruz CHILE Santiago Valparaiso COLOMBIA Bogotá ECUADOR Quito Guayaquil PARAQUAY Asuncion PERU Lima Plura URUGUAY Montevideo VENEZUELA Maracaibo Caracas 0.14 0. Ter Goose Airport Halifax Montreal.06 0. AFB Fort Williams. Ont St.

14 1.65 1.65 1.62 0.56 0.06 1.24 1.56 0.56 0.06 0.06 0.75 0.24 0.24 1.31 0.UFC 1-200-01 31 JULY 2002 Perth Sydney CAROLINE ISLANDS Koror.14 1. Paulau Is Ponape FIJI Suva JOHNSON ISLAND All MARIANA ISLANDS Saipan Tinian MARSHAL ISLANDS All NEW ZEALAND Auckland Wellington PAPAU NEW GUINEA Port Moresby PHILLIPINE ISLANDS Cebu Manila Baguio SAMOA All WAKE ISLAND All 0.56 1.75 0.31 0.24 0.56 0.24 0.24 0.56 1.75 0.56 1.24 0.65 0.06 0.28 0.14 C-10 .14 0.31 0.31 0.