Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Norman Conquest of 1066 was the last Germanic invasion of England. Normans soon gave up their language in favour of French (though this French was heavily influenced by their original Germanic dialect). This dialect of French was the only one spoken by William and his followers when they came to England. Within 10 years after the Conquest the whole country was under his control. Most of the native Anglo-Saxon nobility was killed either at Hastings or later and their places occupied with French barons (baron being a French loan). That is to say, all high offices, both secular and religious, were occupied by Normans thus making sure William would have the necessary support not to lose his power (he felt he could not trust the English to such an extent that even the scriptoria in the monasteries were taken over by French speakers). The feudal system (a Frank invention) was also imported into England so that a very rigid hierarchy was established with the dukes (who spoke French) at the top and the peasants (who spoke English and were bound to the land) at the bottom. Since peasants were bound to the land they had little opportunity to travel and communicate with other people thus increasing the dialectal differences that were not contained by a written standard either.
2. How is the notion of prestige related to the new multilingual situation of England in this period?
During much of the Middle English period, the kings took French wives (accompanied by all their followers) and spent long periods in their possessions in France. The kings could not speak English and the court was a French-speaking one. As we can see, the linguistic situation in England after the Conquest is very complex because French was the language of a minority (only some thousands speakers) but that minority had the political, ecclesiastical, economic and cultural control of the nation . Although the majority of the population spoke English, this had no prestige whatsoever. Together with French and English, three other languages were used in Britain: Norse was spoken (though not written) in the Danelaw and other areas of Scandinavian settlements
3. What are the main facts in the 13th century that contribute to call this a period of English emergence?
In 1204, one of Williams descendents, king John of England, lost all of Normandy except the Channel Islands. Thus, landowners who held possessions both in England and France were forced to choose between the two. The loss of Normandy implied a decline of interest in France among those Anglo-Norman landowners who had opted to stay in England. Such decline of French was not avoided when in the 13th c. king Henry III of England brought in hundreds of French acquaintances and gave them official positions. Other factors contributed to the rise of English, as the rise in popularity of pilgrimages also brought together speakers of many different dialects (Canterbury was one of such places).
UNIT 1. MIDDLE ENGLISH 4. What were the factors that enhanced the idea of nationalism in the 14th century? What were the linguistic consequences?
By the 13th and 14th c. the children of the English nobility began to learn French not as a mother tongue, but as a foreign language. English was now the normal medium of instruction. Although we have seen that French was in decline, it remained as the official language of England. Two events in the 14th c. changed this: The Black Death (bubonic and/or pneumonic plague) whose first cases appeared in England in 1348. It is possible that 2/3 of Europes population was affected. The high mortality implied l abour shortages and many peasants migrated to towns and cities where they could feel freer and earn more. The ruling classes had to respect the lower ones thus increasing the prestige of English. The Hundred years War (1337-1453), an intermittent conflict between England and France. Though there were several English successes, the final victory was French. Joan of Arc made the English lose their last French possessions, so that they had no important practical reasons for learning and using French (it already was an artificially maintained second language in England). In 1362, English became the official language of legal proceedings so that the amount of manuscripts written in English increased enormously. At the same time that other languages (Norse, Latin and Celtic languages) disappeared, and though dialectal differences were kept, there was a new standard emerging. This was based on the dialect spoken in the triangle formed by London (the new capital replacing Winchester), and Oxford and Cambridge where the new universities had been founded. This London standard was somehow a mixture of all existing dialects since people from all parts of the country had migrated there. It was some kind of compromise dialect. When printing was introduced in England toward the end of the 15th c., books were normally printed in this dialect.
UNIT 1. MIDDLE ENGLISH 6. Phonology: What is the Great Vowel Shift? Explain and add some examples
We do not have much information about ME (especially 1100-1200) because the Norman Conquest made French the official language and so, not many records in English have been preserved. However, we know that the English language was changing rapidly and that dialectal differences were becoming greater and greater. By the time English came to be written down again, several things had happened: a) The match between the sound system and the spelling was much worse than in OE because French scribes (not fluent in English) and French loanwords had introduced much confusion. For instance, OE had used <c> to spell both /k/ and /t/. The French used <ch> to spell / t/ and <c> could be used both for /k/ and /s/. b) The new standard of the 14th c. was not a descendant of West Saxon, but the London dialect (essentially an East Midlands dialect). Thus, there is no continuity from OE to ME.
7. Graphics: comment on some general changes concerning the use of letters in this period as in contrast with OE
During this period, spelling and handwriting styles varied not only over time but also in different areas or within the work of one same scribe. Even the total number of letters differed due both to dialectal differences and to the fact that the language was not standardised.. As English replaced French as the official language of the nation, and especially with printing at the end of the ME period, graphic consistency began to appear. In general, there were usually 26 letters in the alphabet: <Z> to represent /x/ and /j/ (<g> represented the velar stop) and <> were retained from the OE alphabet whereas ash and eth were dropped. <J> and <v> are introduced by the French but they are still mere allographs of <i> and <u> respectively. Thus we may find up, vp; even or euen. <y> was still kept as a graphem but it did not represent /y/, it had unrounded to /i/.
UNIT 1. MIDDLE ENGLISH 9. Plural formation: what are the main processes in progress in this period?
In Nouns The OE weak declension with -n in plural survived only in a few nouns such as children, oxen. Some OE neuters with no-endings in the plural are preserved (PE deer-deer). Finally, the OE class of mutated plurals was fairly well preserved in ME and some still are in PE (tooth - teeth). In Adjectives The distinction sg/pl adjectives (ME blind - blinde) lasted until final -e was dropped in pronunciation. French plurals in -s did not have any influence on English adjectives because they had never had such an ending in OE. However, adjectives ending in -s can be seen in words of French origin and following nouns as (attorney generals).
10. Syntax: what is the main difference in contrast with OE? Explain.
The word-order of ME was less free than that of OE but more than the one we have today. The tendency towards rigidity of syntax increases as inflections are lost. As in OE, coordination rather than subordination was the general rule for connecting clauses. The result is sentences that are easy to understand but sound childish or inelegant by modern standards. There were some attempts to imitate Latin syntax (rich in subordination) mainly when translating from those originals.
2- According to the reading, what happened with the Normans in the lower walks of life who came into England with Williams army?
Many of them doubtless remained in the island, and their number was increased by constant accretions throughout the rest of the 11th century and the whole of the next. The numerous castles which the Conqueror built were apparently garrisoned by foreign troops. It is safe to say that every Norman baron was surrounded by a swarm of Norman retainers. Ecclesiastics sometimes entered upon their office accompanied by an armed band of supporters. Likewise merchants and craftsmen from the continent seem to have settled in England in considerable numbers. There was
Use the following sections to summarise the use of French and English in the different social strata.
At first those who spoke French were those of Norman origin, but soon through intermarriage and association with the ruling class numerous people of English extraction must have found it to their advantage to learn the new language, and before long the distinction between those who spoke French and those who spoke English was not racial but largely social. The language of the masses remained English, and it is reasonable to assume that a French soldier settled on a manor with a few hundred English peasants would soon learn the language of the people among whom his lot was cast. The English nobility was not so much a nobility of England as an Anglo-French aristocracy. Nearly all great English landowners frequently contracted continental marriages, and spent much time in France, either in pursuance of their own interests or those of the king. It is true that English was now an uncultivated tongue and the language of a socially inferior class, but there is also plenty of evidence of mutual respect and peaceful co-operation between the Norman and the English from the beginning. The fact that English was the language of the greater part of the population made it altogether likely that many upper classes would acquire some familiarity with it.
2. In what ways was the nobility forced to choose between England and France?
After the Norman Conquest a large number of men held lands in both countries. A kind of interlocking aristocracy existed, so that it might be difficult for some of the English nobility to say whether they belonged more to England or to the continent. On several occasions Henry I confiscated the English estates of unruly (revoltoso) Norman barons. But the process of separation was accelerated; the king of France announced that he had confiscated the lands of several great barons and of all those knights who had their abode (residencia) in England. For the most part the families that had estates on both sides of the Cahnnel were compelled to give up one or the other. Sometimes they divided into branches and made separate terms; in other cases great nobles preferred their larger holdings in England and gave up their Norman lands. The separation was by no means. In one way or another some nobles succeeded in retaining their position in both countries. But double allegiance was generally felt to be awkward, and the voluntary division of estates went on.
4. What was the reaction against foreigners and the growth of national feelings?
An answer to the question may lie in the fact that the inpouring of foreigners was not completely unfavorable to the English language. This is because a reaction was bound to follow. Even during the reign of John there were calls for a policy of "England for the English". And in the reign of Henry III the antagonism arose immediately after the first stream of foreigners came to England. The king dismissed the foreigners from the important offices they held, but they were soon back. Opposition to foreigners became the principal ground for national feeling. When Edward came to the throne England entered upon a period of consciousness of its unity. The government officials were for the most part English, and the king warned against the purpose of the king of France to "wipe out the English tongue". The effect of the foreign incursions in the thirteenth century was to delay the natural spread of the use of English by the upper class that had begun earlier. It also stimulated the consciousness of the difference between those who participated in English affairs as to consider themselves Englishmen, and those who flocked to England to enjoy Henry's favors. On of the frequent criticisms against the newcomers was that there was a general feeling that some knowledge of English was regarded a proper mark of an Englishman.
5. English and French change roles from the initial diglossic situation of the period in which French had more prestige, please explain this process and how English gains its prestige back.
In the thirteenth century, the prestige of French civilitation constituted a reason for using the language among polite circles in England. In spite of that, although upper classes continued for the most part to speak French, English was also making steady advances. By the middle of the century, when the separation of the English nobles from their interests in France had been about completed, English was becoming a matter of general use among upper classes. At the close of the thirteenth century, French language begins to lose its hold on England. The tendency to speak English was becoming constantly stronger even in those two most conservative
7. Summarise the situation of the English language in the schools at the time
From a time shortly after the Conquest French had replaced English as the language of schools. A statement of Ranulph Higden in the fourteenth century shows that in his day the use of French in the schools was quite general. After the black death, two Oxford schoolmasters were responsible for a great innovation in English education. By a fortunate circumstance we know that there was a John Cornwall licensed to teach Latin
READING 3. CHAUCER
1. Changing society in the late Middle Ages: explain the social situation in Chaucers time.
In late 14th century, there were blurred social categories. The mediaeval ideas of three estates were complex and unstable social strata. The middle class was large and prosperous and began to play increasingly roles in church and state. Chaucer belonged to this social category.
5. What is a dream vision? How does Chaucer use this genre in the Canterbury Tales?
A dream vision is a literary device in which a dream is told for specific purposes. The narrator narrates his experience of falling asleep, dreaming, and waking. Chaucer had been known as a writer of poems of love/dream visions. The General Prologue of The Canterbury Tales begins with the description of Spring, characteristic of dream vision of secular love. His first audience, hearing this opening, may have expected to hear the introduction of a poem on aristocratic love.