You are on page 1of 2

The FOIA Shell Game

In December 2005, President Bush directed federal agencies to speed up their response to
requests under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by appointing chief FOIA officers and
adopting concrete timelines and fulfillment goals. In the time since, those goals have not been
met – although U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales would have you believe otherwise.

Newspaper Beat by Mark Fitzgerald


Editor & Publisher
CHICAGO (July 11, 2007) – For advocates of government transparency – and, as
election after election shows, that means the overwhelming majority of Americans – Dec. 14,
2005, brought an unexpected early Christmas gift from a Bush White House that has a devotion
to secrecy rivaled only by the Illuminati. In an executive order larded with enough rhetoric about
openness to make the folks at the National Freedom of Information Coalition blush, President
George W. Bush on that day directed federal agencies to speed up their response to requests
under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by appointing chief FOIA officers and adopting
concrete timelines and fulfillment goals.
Eighteen months later, we’ve gotten our second report from U.S. Attorney General
Alberto Gonzales on how the 92 federal agencies are doing – and boy, it seems those bureaucrats
are really hopping to it. “Overall, federal agencies made diligent and measurable progress in
implementing the executive order during this first reporting period, which represents only a little
more than seven months of activity under the FOIA Improvement Plans,” Gonzales reports.
More than half of the agencies – 54 of them! – actually met their mostly modest milestone goals
on time, he exults.
Now, if my youngest kid brought home a report card from St. Thecla Elementary School
with a mark of 59, the next time he touched his PlayStation controls he’d have to wipe away the
cobwebs. But this is government work, after all, and Gonzales assures us that this White House
and its agencies are making Progress toward citizen-centered and results-oriented FOIA
practices. And if we can’t believe Gonzales – he of the torture memos, Patriot Act wiretapping
greenlights, and political hiring and mass firing of federal prosecutors – then the terrorists have
won. Or something.
Maybe he was distracted preparing for testimony before Congress, but our attorney
general couldn’t make even his own “progress” report sound much like progress.
As the invaluable Coalition of Journalists for Open Government noted in its analysis of
the report, the very first example of an agency really getting on the stick is Housing and Urban
Development (HUD), which Gonzales hailed for taking “the challenge of backlog reduction
seriously.” So what, specifically, had HUD done? It issued a memo on dealing with backlogs.
Meanwhile, as the coalition notes, HUD’s actual backlog rose 33% in 2006, beginning the year
with 3,725 unprocessed requests and ending it with 4,951.
Little in Gonzales’ report contradicts the interim report card the coalition issued back in
February, when the first agencies started reporting on their FOIA performances. What are the
actual backlogs at the “key” agencies supposedly making so much progress? The report doesn’t
say.
The fact is, backlogs are increasing at many agencies, the waits to fulfill FOIA requests
are growing longer, FOIA response staffs have been slashed, and bureaucrats under the Bush
administration are saying no to requesters far more often than they did during the Clinton era.
Where the report mentions “challenges” in an agency’s performance, it tries to slough it
off by portraying the bureaucrats as overwhelmed by a sudden increase in requests. The report
notes, as if this were some inexplicable phenomenon, that the Department of Veterans Affairs,
for instance, received 23,811 more requests last year than in 2005. Funny how that works: Start a
war, and the next thing you know, more vets are FOIA-ing the VA.
There’s a fix for this problem, and it’s awaiting what would be overwhelming legislative
approval – because congressmen know that the typical FOIA requester is not a nosy investigative
reporter looking for scandals but rather that disabled vet, that codger pursuing Social Security
benefits, that farmer curious about how the Department of Agriculture allocates subsidies in his
neck of the woods.
The fix is the Openness Promotes Effectiveness in Our National Government Act of
2007, or OPEN Government Act, S. 849. Perhaps the best shorthand description of the bill
appeared in the Fairfield County (Conn.) Weekly: “a true Patriot Act designed to open up
government machinations and documents to the public and press, and to prevent self-interested
officials from secretly misusing their given power.” It would give the federal FOIA the same
kind of teeth – such as absolute deadlines with real consequences for bureaucrats – that many
states have adopted.
But as E&P goes to press there still has been no vote on the measure, because Sen. John
Kyl (R-Ariz.) put a secret hold on it. When Kyl’s opposition was outed by a Wiki-journalism
effort led by the Society of Professional Journalists, he explained that he was blocking it because
the Justice Department told him it had “uncharacteristically strong” objections to the law. So the
same Alberto Gonzales who is trying to sell a rosy picture of a White House intent on making
FOIA more accessible is sabotaging the very law that would accomplish that.