/ 15

/

The Federal Courts Are Committing Treason to the Constitution!
Chief Justice John Marshall’s voice from the past cries out for taking jurisdiction in today’s Obama Article II eligibility cases.
Per the great U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall, the federal courts and judges are committing treason to the Constitution by not taking jurisdiction and getting to the merits in the various cases before them regarding the Article II eligibility clause question for Obama.
U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall

It is worth keeping in mind the words of U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall when he wrote in Cohens v. Virginia 19 US 264 (1821):

“It is most true that this Court will not take jurisdiction if it should not: but it is equally true, that it must take jurisdiction if it should. The judiciary cannot, as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches the confines of the constitution. We cannot pass it by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it, if it be brought before us. We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the constitution. Questions may occur which we would gladly avoid; but we cannot avoid them. All we can do is, to exercise our best judgment, and conscientiously to perform our duty. In doing this, on the present occasion, we find this tribunal invested with appellate jurisdiction in all cases arising under the constitution and laws of the United States. We find no exception to this grant, and we cannot insert one.”
The Judges in the various Obama Article II Constitutional eligibility cases should simply read the words of U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Marshall from the past and take jurisdiction of the constitutional question of the Article II eligibility clause in the Constitution and proceed to a fact finding hearing and trial on the merits to see if Obama is Constitutionally eligible or not. I say Obama is NOT eligible. Obama is not a natural born citizen of the USA. Obama was born a British subject. Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen nor was he even an immigrant to the USA. The DNC covered up for Obama. Congress failed in their duty to vet Obama’s eligibility. Congress said this is a legal matter for the courts. We need the federal courts to take the cases, get to the merits, and get a U.S. Supreme Court ruling to settle this. Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., CDR USNR (Ret), Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al

MONDAY, OCTOBER 19, 2009 / THE WASHINGTON TIMES /

To help the Kerchner v Obama & Congress lawsuit, contact: Mario Apuzzo, Esq. 185 Gatzmer Ave, Jamesburg NJ 08831 TEL: 732-521-1900 FAX: 732-521-3906 Email: apuzzo@erols.com BLOG: http://puzo1.blogspot.com http://www.protectourliberty.org

Link to the Treason Quote in Cohens v Virginia (1821) case: http://www.kerchner.com/images/protectourliberty/chiefjusticemarshall wordsontreasontoconstitution.jpg Link to the Cohens v Virginia (1821) Case Summary: http://www.oyez.org/cases/1792-1850/1821/1821_0 Link to the Cohens v Virginia (1821) Full Case: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=19&invol=264

Paid for by: American people donating funds at ProtectOurLiberty.org in support of the Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al lawsuit.