Page 1 of 11

Subj: Date: From: To:

(no subject) 3/17/2014 7:37:14 P.M. Central Daylight Time

To Whom it may CONCERN FORENSIC FILES 40 years of Minnesota Corrupt Lawyers and Judges Attorney Generals Spannaus,Humphrey,Hatch and Lori Swanson Heinous takings of Life,Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness vs. Attorney Pro Se's, with False Books ie Harriet Lansing, False Medical Records to mislead the Taxpaying Voting Public to Libel with Malice any all Non Lawyers. MON.17MAR2014 St. Patrick Day

U S v. CRUIKSHANK, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)A 92 U.S. 542 UNITED STATES v. CRUIKSHANK ET AL. By Jenny Tsay, Esq. on March 11, 2014 2:47 PM The D.C. Circuit has affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit brought by medical doctors challenging the constitutionality of the implementation of Obamacare. In Association of American Physicians and Surgeons v. Sebelius, one of the arguments asserted by the plaintiffs was that Congress violated the Origination Clause of the U.S. Constitution when it enacted the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. October Term, 1875[ U S v. Cruikshank 92 U.S. 542 (1875)

and SharonScarrellaAnderson Quitam Relator Appellant Blind VA Widow vs State of Minnesota,Dfl Mark Dayton,luindaJesson aka Mrs.Peter Knapp DHS,et al Appellee-Respondants in Official Capacity,Licensed LawyerJudges,Darwin Lookingbill and Spouse Potter et al individually,severally,personally,official capacity,John Doe,Mary Roe FAX E-CCOMMERCE TRANSMITTAL NOTICE OF APPEAL RAMSEY DIST.FILE 670295 DTD.10Mar.2014 worker Jennifer L. Tetu tel 651-272-8345 Fax 651-266-3922 or 4439 rcvd Thurs.13Mar2014 postage prepaid 38cents meter 3005365

Friday, March 21, 2014 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 2 of 11

COUNT I MAJOR CASE FIXING ADA TITLEIII42USCs1218-129 $file/13-5003-1482743.pdf VIA FAX TRANSMITTAL COUNT II TITLE 18USCs1031 Major Fraud for 40 years RECONSIDERATION RECOMMENDED AND ORDER FILE149632 David Gassoway Louis Thayer "No Contact no" Tel 651-431-2907 Fax 651431-7443 or 7523 COMMISSIONER LUCINDA JESSON

Scarrella (Sharon) v. Spannaus (Warren) U.S. Supreme Court Transcript of Record with Supporting Pleadings by Sharon L Scarrella (Oct 30, 2011) Formats Price New Used



Sharon L. Scarrella et al., Petitioners, v. Midwest Federal Savings and Loan Association of Minneapolis et al.... by Sharon L Scarrella and

Friday, March 21, 2014 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 3 of 11

HARRIET LANSING(Oct 30, 2011) ST.PAUL,MN.55101 NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE COUNT I Case Fixing Medicare,ADA,BANK REGULATION 609.43, 2013 Minnesota Statutes - Office of the Revisor of Statutes MN Legislature · Get Connected · About the Legislature; Mobile Site ... Town Officer ...MS 609.43 Newly Discovered Evidence of Ramsey Co Director HS Monty Martin acting in Concort with the State Dhs Employee's taking Medicare Payments out of Affiants Social Security of $1,269 creating Heinous Hardship . Redunant Paper ,Combined Manuel is only renewal or recertified yearly. a. Sharon did not appeal the 15 dollar Food Stamp Award b. Wilful neglience for Gay Lawyer Darwin LOOKINBILL,Judges Gassoway and Thayer to ISSUE Bogus Orders without the Forensic Files in pdf format to Appeal. c.27Feb2014 20 below with Wind Chill 40below Schools were Closed etc. Gassoway called Sharon then Arbitrarily Hung up on Sharon, then wrote False Statement Order that Sharon did not appear. WHEN FAXED IN. d. The State and County willfully failed to Address the Medicare Payments 0ct 1996, Affiant was involuntary thrown into St. Peter and Brainard State Hospitals for 94 days, e. Sharons 2nd Husband was thrown in Brainard or 1 year, both under the alleged Gardianship of State Attorney General Humphrey,Hatch,Swanson their Agents re f. Cpl Jim Anderson was Murdered 21Sept2000 unabated by Public OFFICIAL. COUNT II THEFT BY SWINDLE Ltr.dtd.13Feb2014 5th Case Worker Jenneifer L TETU tel 651272-8345 Fax 651-266-3922 reinstating Affiants Medicare until 31Mar2014. Currently another Bogus Form to appeal that Medicare Benefits are again taken Apr 1st,2014

Friday, March 21, 2014 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 4 of 11

stating Eligibility 65/Qll Accounts and Homeowners INSURANCE on File since 2009, Conspiracy Monty Martin acting in concort with Mark OSWALD his agent Laura Manning to Falsify Property Tax Records to Create Mortgage Forclosures, triggering US Band Fraud. Construction of a criminal statute is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Colvin, 645 N.W.2d 449, 452 (Minn. 2002). A statute must be construed according to its plain language, but if it is ambiguous, the intent of the legislature controls. Minn. Stat. 645.16 (2008). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. Free: 1-877-6966775 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Minnesota,All Agencies vs. Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella aka Peterson vs. State MN,Ramsey Co.,CitySt.Paul, DFl GOV.Mark Dayton Telephone: 651-201-3400 Toll Free: 800-657-3717 Minnesota Relay 800-627-3529 Fax: 651-797-1850 1. DHS telCommissioner Lucinda Jesson Phone: (651) 431-2000 Fax: (651) 431-7443 2. HR Commissioner Kevin Lindsey former Ramsey Co. Asst. Attorney Phone: (651) 296-5663 Fax: (651) 296-9042 3. MNAG Lori.Swanson Tel.651-2963353 Fax 651-282-2155 4. Director HS Tel651-266-3230 Fx 266-3032 cc; Agents Brad Borcher,AmyAndre,Barbxx, pauline Thao , Jennifer L. Tetu et al 5. All others as their interest appear John Doe and Mary Roe Click here: Wed.26Feb2014 Please take legal Notice' RE; Ramsey Co. Medicare File 670295 DHS Medicare 149632

Friday, March 21, 2014 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 5 of 11

Forensic Files unabated by Government Officials MS 609.43 Qualifications. Address the 94 thous Commitment Rule 20 as Sharon refused to hire a Shyster 1997, Murder of Cpl Jim Anderson 21Sept.2000 after 1 yr at Brainard. Deceptive Trade Practice as Costs were sent to Medicare and VA to defraud US Gov. MINNESOTA MALICIOUS 11. A13-1746 Kevin Scott Karsjens, Appellant, vs. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services, Respondent. Affirmed. Judge Matthew E. Johnson. Supreme Court Appeal Panel. THE PUBLIC HAS THE RIGHT TO KNOW THAT THE JUDICIAL PANEL IE SCAP COMMITTMENT IS MADE UP OF LESBIAN JUDGES. MALPRACTICE,MISFEASANCE,NONFEASANCE,MALFEASANCE MEDICARE TAKEN TO FORCE MNSURE In a message dated 2/25/2014 8:19:17 A.M. Central Standard Time, writes:Subj: Re: KarsjensvsDHSJesson 11cv3659MNSharonsMEDICAREQuiTamRelator670295_149632 Legal Notice to State of Minnesota, Gov. Mark Dayton, All Agencies,Media Affiant Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella will appear Thurs 27thFeb.2014 for Fair Hearing before Impartial Hearing Officer or Commissioner Lucinda Jesson via Fax. Wilful Neglience to address Affiants Motions, Report to County Attorney Corruption in Monty Martin HS similar to Lou MCkenna Days.

Friday, March 21, 2014 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 6 of 11

"During the 2011 state government shutdown, which started on July 1st, the Governor was represented by private counsel to intervene in the district court proceedings that allowed for “essential” services to be paid by the government through court orders during the government shutdown. The Governor entered into a letter engagement letter with the attorney who had agreed to do the work “pro bono,” that is, without payment. The shutdown ended on July 20, 2011. In August, the Governor amended the letter agreement and subsequently paid counsel for billable time of the legal services for a total of $77,000. The Legislative Auditor found that the Governor violated several laws in the arrangement made with legal counsel. For instance, the engagement letter did not specify an expiration date, limit the compensation amount, and did not contain certain statutory contract requirements and other standard contract clauses required by state policy designed to protect state interests. In addition, the Governor’s Office did not encumber funds for the services as required under governing state statute. The Governor’s Office must be held accountable, like every other Executive Branch officer, for the expenditure of public funds and cannot circumvent the law. When an officer does so, he or she has unlawfully expended public funds. It would be our belief, the Governor’s expenditures were unlawful and that the moneys expended must be accounted for and repaid back to the state government. This may require legal action similar to what our organization has done in the most recent action against the Secretary of State for the unauthorized use of public funds for an unauthorized online voter registration program.

Friday, March 21, 2014 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 7 of 11

Andy Cilek New Property Search > Property Search Results. Note: Click on a PIN (Property ID#) to continue PIN (Property ID#) Number Street Address Surrey Ave City St. Paul 697

Database Last Refreshed 02-26-2014 05:28:00 Copyright 2003 Ramsey County Email: Property Identification Number (PIN) Property Address 697 Surrey Ave Municipality St. Paul Watershed Capital Region School District Number W/S 625 Tax Year 2013 2013 2013 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 Date Type 09-19- Payment 2013 05-10- Payment 2013 03-03- Original 2013 Charge 10-16- Payment 2012 10-11- Payment 2012 09-18- Payment 2012 05-23- Payment 2012 05-23- Payment 2012 04-10- Payment Tax Amount or Adjustment 0.00 0.00 664.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Amount Paid 332.00 332.00 0.00 1,368.00 2,666.00 293.50 -7,164.00 7,164.00 292.00

Friday, March 21, 2014 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 8 of 11

2012 2012 03-10- Original 584.00 0.00 2012 Charge 2011 09-07- Payment 0.00 353.00 2011 2011 04-25- Payment 0.00 45.29 2011 2011 04-14- Payment 0.00 353.00 2011 2011 02-26- Original 706.00 0.00 2011 Charge query=Minnesota+Sharon+Anderson Affiants intent is to expose the SCAP Panel Affiants Mother was overdosed with Potassium , 1983 St.Paul Mayoral Candidate died or was "Murdered" exposing the Tax Exempt Dist. Heating.......... unabated by the City,County and State Attorneys. http:

Sasc1988 Brief15pdf 2 years ago, 166 views

Jrsa 88 Homeless 17 2 years ago, 441 views

Jt Memoof Law Support Mo… 2 years ago,

Friday, March 21, 2014 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 9 of 11


Sa 2 Jan09 Swanson 2 years ago, 443 views

File4[1]Shar Thune 22 2 years ago, 544 views

L Ufsky&Jr 2 years ago, 244 views

1058 Warrant 34 2 years ago, 792 views // with over 111 Documents Forensic Evidence

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/ ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! Sharon4 Anderson - Google Profile Candidate AG2010 iGoogle www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.comHomestead Act of 1862

Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058's Buzz Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home | FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption

Friday, March 21, 2014 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 10 of 11 20proposal-2012-09-26.pdf AttorneyProSe_Private AG, ECF 65913 Pacer:sa1299 Tel: 651-776-5835 HEALTH CARE Candidate 2014MNAG id=608&utm_source=Sentry+-+3%2F21%2F12+Healthcare&utm_campaign=32112+Healthcare+SENTRY&utm_medium=email -content/uploads/2012/01/10-1032-bsac-Massachusetts.pdf POA

The case had been dismissed by the D.C. District Court for lack of standing and failure to state a claim by the association. The doctors appealed that dismissal, but were unsuccessful. Origination Clause The Origination Clause, aka the Revenue Clause, states that all bills for raising revenue must originate in the House of Representatives, but the Senate may amend or concur as with other bills. "All bills for raising revenue" only pertains to bills that levy taxes, so bills for other purposes which incidentally generate revenue aren't included under the clause. Subj: Sharons Medicare,Taxes,EquityLine vs. DHSlucindaJesson ISSUES; Property taxes paid Equity Line of $5oo monthly to debit down US BANK FRAUD RE Property taxes,Conspiracy to Exploit the

Friday, March 21, 2014 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 11 of 11

Blind,HardHearing Redunant Paper Trail contrary to Title III ADA42USC12181-12189 DOUBLE TROUBLE FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME

Friday, March 21, 2014 AOL: Sharon4Anderson



62cv10-112 _2009 Tax Delinquent _ Personal Injury’s_RICO Claims,Deceptive Trade Practices. MS609.903 MS 609.605 State of Minnesota by and thro ACS_Manatron, Ramsey Co. Auditor Mark Oswald et al 2009 Tax Delinquent Vs. In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described to Wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul,Lot 5,Blk46,aka 697 Surrey Avenue PIN: Sharon Lea Andeson aka Sharon Scarrella Anderson aka Sharon Peterson-Chergosky record owner. Defendant’s RICO_Relator 3rd Party QuiTam 22F.3d 783 Scarrella v. Midwest Fed S&L USCAVC 03-0639 Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs RICO_Relatee’s to also join with MN Supreme Court A061150 Quo Warranto MS2.724, “Taking Drivers License” cit 905191492,MS 171.02 171.16 30 day suspension only,MS 117 Eminent Domain “takings” WATER File No. 62-cv09-1163_ 2008 Tax Delinquent re: indicating a “Patterned Enterprise” over 25 years.
Case Type: Other Civil and RICO_Criminal similar 62cv09-11693 Sup Crt. A100064 Unallotment. Nancy Lazaryan 42USC 3631

AFFIDAVITS OF PREJUDICE MS 176.312 In re: Scarrella4Justice 221NW2nd562

Beale v. McClure

To: All Persons with legal interest in the Parcels of Real Property described in the Following Delinquent Tax List, Filed with District Court Administrator Lynae.K.E. Olson 651-2202, published 2008 Tax Delinquent 18Mar09 MapleWood Review and 2009 Tax Delinquent.published 17Mar10.

Affidavit by Sharon4Anderson Electronic_Fax Service,US Mail to Clerk Court Mon.19Apr2010 postage prepaid,

STATE OF MINNSOTA, DEFENDANTS JOINT ANSWER/CROSSCOMPLAINT, CONSTITUTIONALITY MS 429.061 MS 279 , MS 508/ MS 171.02 AUDITOR MARK OSWALD 697 SURREY AVE $2,499.43 Reconfigured Amt. unknown 2009, Classification,”takings” Homestead,DisabilitysDisparagment of Titles,Death, State of Minnesota, Rule 24.04 by and thro State Attorney General Lori Swanson ,Constitutionality MS 429.061,Title Examiner Wayne D. Anderson MS 508.12, Revenue Ward Einess, Michael Campion, Public Safety,Mark Oswald,RamseyCo.Auditor/Tax/Elections,,ACS,Manatron,Chris Samuels,Larry Dease,Court Administrator,St.Paul Mayor Chris B. Coleman,City Clerk Shari Moore,Council President Kathy Lantry, Janice Rettman res: No 2009-012,Toni Carter Canvass Board and County Commissioners, DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling,Wally Nelson dba Renovation Inc.,Lyn Moser, Kristine A. Kujala Supervisor Property Tax Services in their Official Capacity‘s, Individually,Severally, acting in concort with John Doe and Mary Roe. SCAP,Judges Kathleen Gearin,Joanne Smith,Gregg Johnson,Salvador Rosas,Larry Cohen, John Vandenorth, Edward Toussaint Appeal A09-2031 et al 1988 Files 495722 499129 Default 66 Million Dollars. Plaintiffs V. 697 Surrey Ave St.Paul,MN.55106 ,Intestate Decedant ,VA Widow,Senior,Disabled Political Activist Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Chergosky_Scarrella Page 2 of 2

Beale v. McClure + 96 Blogs Candidate Republican State Attorney General , et al as their interest appear , Defendants and 3rd Party Plaintiffs,Intestate Decedants Tenant in Common Wm.O and Bernice A.Peterson. *************************************************************** TO THE ABOVE NAMED PLAINTIFF’S AND THEIR ATTORNEYS LORI SWANSON,STATE CAPITOL,SUSAN GAERTNER,JOHN CHOI,AT THEIR RESPECTIVE OFFICES . Defendants, as and for their Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint, state: 1. Deny each and every matter,allegation and thing contained in Plaintiffs Vague,Arbitrary, False Assessments, by Theft,Trespass,Treason, except as hereinafter specifically admitted,qualified or otherwise answered. A. By information and belief No Administrative Hearing’s have been held to confer Authority/Jurisdiction. 2008,2009,2010.since 1982 re: 82-1292 Appeal C8-84-241 2. Defendants admitted to having Homestead Classification since 1992, (17 yrs), Ex. pg 8 Paid the full property taxes of $949.86, for 2008. Challenge that Title 18 USC 1001 False charges. By Mark Oswald to “take” HS Credit, A.15Apr2010, by US Mails Electronicall served Application for Review Form 1679 challenging “takings” Homestead Credits and Bogus Non Homestead contrary to sec. 3631 Title 42. Summary Abatements, ROW with 12 % interest , Unconstitutionally Vague,Arbitrary,Discriminatory, contrary to MN Const. Art. X. with exhibits including ltr.dtd. 14Apr10, rcvd 16Apr10 by Kristine A. Kujala Supervisor Property Tax Services,651-296-3781 admitting Bizzare Ponzi Scheme, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary responsibilitys, reckless fraud and concealment, misrepresentation and unlawful and deceptive trade practices. They made a willful mistake,Unabated by Defendant Co attorney Susan Gaertner.
“change 2009 * * * from Residential Non-Homestead to Residential Homestead Blind/Disability”

Page 3 of 3

Beale v. McClure

INTENT It is the intent of this fiduciary to challenge the Constitutionality and Assessment,Ratifications, findings, and conclusions apparently made by the DSI Inspector Joel Essling, Water Shutoff by Jerome Ludden acting in Concort with Wally Nelson dba Renovation Inc. PLEASE NOTE: Today Sun. 18Apr10 at 9:30 am, while Affiant was getting the Sun Papers, The Blue Water Truck was just driving around, Affiant said what do you want” He got out of Car parked on wrong side of Street and stated: Nothing We are planting a tree at 699 Surrey,“ on file for other WaterTrucks. City Council President Kathy Lantry acting in concort with Marcia Moermond in proper venue and forum Art. II US Constitution ,First Amendment right to petition for redress of greivances: it is Affiants intent to preserve all Constitutional rights, either by amendment,supplement or future litigation and or Removal’s to protect property interest rights under Constitutional and Statutory Law: Court File’s A06 -1150 62cv09-1163,62cv10-112 apparently are Administrative without Filing Fees, to Simulate Legal Process, causing irreparable intentional infliction of emotional stress, anti-trust by government official, Sharons intent to preserve minimal or full-blown due process rights to an Administrative Hearing with FOIA Disclosure of Warrants, Tickets, signed off by City Attorneys, to Steal Cars,Trailers,, in US Supreme Court decisions it has been determined that it is clearly unlawful to seize or levy funds absent a prior fully disclosed proof of lawful claim or judicial due process through judicial courts with proper jurisdiction. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp. 337 US 682 (1949) Kelo Decision Stands I Wilful negilenge of the Courts to READ the Record, ForensicFiles URL’s also 3. As to the Allegations “taken” in the form of Summary Judgment, published Falsely in the Maplewood Review, 18Mar09 pg.53 Sharon Anderson 697 Surrey Ave. Lyman Dayton Add. Lot 5 Blk 46 2008 $2,499.43 without proper citation of any statute,ordinance,rule,or regulation which Defendants alleged to have violated contrary to Crim Rules , as to the required specificity of an apparent crimial accusation of “not paying taxes” US Page 4 of 4

Beale v. McClure

v. Cruikshank,92 US 542 at 558 (1876), Affiant was the only one of 3 thousand alleged Delinquents to Challenge. Triggering “at risk” Anti Trust Litigation. Affiants property strangely absent 2009 Tax Delinquent “but for” Ii Chief Judge Kathleen R Gearin pg. 20 published Wed. 17Mar10 Apt.Own no.85 St.Albans Row unit 6 $2,660.59 , willful Tax Delinquent, triggers her Ethics to hear the Brayton v. Ward Einess, Cal Ludeman 62cv09-11693 Unallotment Case Affidavits of Prejudice filed URL’s at Taxes pd-DM-F9-1366 v. Judge Gregg Johnson re: Murder of Cpl Anderson.

COUNT I CONSPIRACY Title 18 s. 241,242 Between April 2005 up to and including the present The “taking” of Sharons Drivers License contrary to State and Federal Laws, Stalking of Sharon by shutting off Water, A06-1150 Justice Russell Anderson Denied Access to Blow the Whistle on Major RICO Acts by the City of St. Paul, County of Ramsey, unabated by the DFL County Attorney Susan Gaertner, Darwin Looking Bill and Jean Stepan,Stalking causing Fracutured Ankle, Sharon ran for State Ag from her Wheel Chair, Plaintiffs, Lantry,Moore,Coleman,Kessler,Essling, did unlawfully “take“ Sharons Valid Drivers License M243104164509 Oct. 2005 “combine,conspire,confederate and agree to Shut Off Sharons Water 2006 Police Stalking fractured ankle 2006 then 2007 Steal Sharons Car, Trailer, Realestate “takings” contrary to 5th Amendments Just Compensation, obstruct justice in connection with the Homicide of Cpl James R. Anderson starting 1996, when Sharon paid the property taxes on her Cabin in Itasca Co. legally in the Corporation of Anderson+Advocates, by altering and orchestrating the crime scene, disposing of,altering and planting evidence, commitments to Brainard for 1 year by the SCAP Panel Gearin and Smith, lying to law enforcement authorities and others about the true circumstances surrounding Sharons RealEstate, Disabilitys,Disparagment of Title and Death of Tenants in Common and Sharons 2nd Husband. Removals to Federal Court, Ann Montgomery locked the Doors denying Access to Seats of Government, JR Anderson was dying at Brainard State Hospital. Page 5 of 5

Beale v. McClure

4. Defendants are without sufficient information in order to judge the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in the Tax Statement’s 2008,2009 and the 2010 The Valuation is now challenged, Classification,Assessments,Fees,Row Maintainance,Delq Utilitys, Usurious interest , hold the Plaintiffs to the strictest proof thereof. 5. Defendants deny the False Assessments,False Fees, Ratification thereof obtained by Fraud and Murder to Steal Sharon’s Realestate, Car’s,Trailers, Personal Property, reducing her to utter Poverty, Standing in Food Lines, for over 4 years, Heinous Hardship of taking Commerce Rights to drive to get grocerys, medical care and the Aitkin,Itaska Cabins. “taken under color of corrupt Judges” AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 6. As its First Affirmative Defense, Defendants state Plaintiffs complaints of Non Payment of Property Taxes fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Affinats Bank Statements prove Taxes Paid, but for Theft,Trespass,Treason of Taking Car,Trailer Constitutionality MS429.061. 7. As its Second Affirmative Defense, Defendants state insufficiency of service of process, Fraud upon the Court,which failed to read the Forensic Files,Records, Judge John Vandenorth does not pay any ROW fees, or fair share . AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY PUBLICATION AFFIDAVIT OF INFORMIA PAUPERIOUS Faxed>Mon.30Mar09 to 651-266-8263 By depositing in the US Mails postage prepaid 19Apr2010 62cv10-112 ON SHARONS BLOGS, PDF FILES: BY E-COMMERCE: E-MAIL STATE OF MINNESOTA ET AL V. 697 SURREY ET AL

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FILE: 62-cv09-1163 62cv10-112 Please take legal notice, pending Full Disclosure, Tickets,Warrants, Constitionality, Demand for Grand Jury Indictments against the Plaintiffs QUESTIONS PRESENTED : Whether a state violates the dormant Commerce Clause by providing an Page 6 of 6

Beale v. McClure

exemption of Homestead Credits, Old House Credits, Disabled, Senior Credits, re: MN Const. Art.X to the citizenry, yet Denial to a Political Candidate for State Attorney General, Judge,State Rep64a ? Obama Health Care comes into play Affiant on the Mon.19Apr2010 by US Mails filed State & Federal Taxes, Property Tax Refund 2009, to resolve this Matter: Affiant has blown the Whistle on ie: Manatron with Chris Samuels Conflict, the Facts that files are deleted, Property Statements have NOT been mailed, triggering State and Federal Investigations into Wire,Bank,Mail Fraud or Software Provider. /s/ Sharon Anderson Private Attorney General, Attorney Pro Se_InFact will Move the Jurisdiction/Authority of the Court to investigate the Major Fraud in the Property Tax/Election in Ramsey Co. and City of St. Paul, MN. Recover of Car,Trailer,Personal Propertys,Drivers License, plus Quiet Titles to 1058 Summit Ave, Homestead, 325 No. Wilder 6 unit, 2194 Marshall duplex,448 Desnoyer duplex “taken” without Just Compensation Attorney Fees $240.00 pr hour, WHEREFORE< Defendants pray that Plaintiff take nothing by their pretended cause of action and that the same be dismissed and that Defendants recover their costs,disbursements,herein attorney pro se fees, quiet title actions,on all Sharon Scarrella Anderson dba Church of Justice Reform, Rose of Sharon Ministrys, Anderson+Advocates, “taken” without Just Compensation, under color of Authority, by the Corrupt Judiciary. Examiner of Titles are appointed by Judges,yet paid for by the County Taxpayers,Unconstitutionally Vague MS508.12 Dated: Sat. 17thApr2010 sa1299 MEMORANDUM OF LAW ENCOMPASSED HEREIN Qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act: As expressed by a court discussing the original version of the Act, qui tam actions are based on the theory "that one of the least expensive and most effective means of preventing frauds on the Treasury is to make the perpetrators of them liable to actions by private persons acting, if you please, under the strong stimulus of personal ill will or the hope of gain." United States v. Griswold, 24 F. 361, 366 (D. Or. 1885) (quoted, inter alia, in Quinn, 14 F.3d at 649 (emphasis added)). It can be argued that monies paid in settlement to a relator outside of the framework of an action brought under the Act should have an equivalent deterrent effect to monies paid in settlement subsequent Page 7 of 7 /s/ Sharon Anderson ECF _P165913 Pacer:

Beale v. McClure

to the filing of the suit. We believe, however, that the Act's deterrent objectives would be diluted substantially by the enforcement of prefiling releases. To see this, one need only assume that, but for the filing of a qui tam claim, the government would be significantly less likely to learn of the allegations of fraud. Because Congress itself has made this very assumption, see Senate Report, supra, at 4-7, reprinted in U.S.C.C.A.N. at 5269-72, we find it a reasonable starting point. When the qui tam relator files suit, the relator stands to receive only a percentage of the eventual proceeds from the action; at most, this will amount to 30 percent of the recovery. See 31 U.S.C.A. S 3730(d) (West Supp. 1994). Accordingly, in settlement negotiations, both the government and the relator will have incentives to maximize the expected gross recovery. It is commonly recognized that the central purpose of the qui tam provisions of the FCA is to "set up incentives to supplement government enforcement" of the Act, Quinn, 14 F.3d at 649, by "encourag[ing] insiders privy to a fraud on the government to blow the whistle on the crime," Wang v. FMC Corp., 975 F.2d 1412, 1419 (9th Cir. 1992). The history and structure of the FCA and its qui tam provisions is described in United States ex rel. Springfield Terminal Ry. Co. v. Quinn, 14 F.3d 645, 649-55 (D.C. Cir. 1994); United States ex rel. Kelly v. Boeing Co., 9 F.3d 743, 745-47 (9th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 1125 (1994); United States ex rel. Stinson, Lyons, Gerlin & Bustamante, P.A. v. Prudential Ins. Co., 944 F.2d 1149, 1152-1154 (3d Cir. 1991); John T. Boese, Civil False Claims and Qui Tam Actions (1993). The vital importance of this incentive effect is demonstrated by the reasons set forth by Congress in 1986 in undertaking the first extensive revision of the Act since its enactment in 1863. Congress expressed its judgment that "sophisticated and widespread fraud" that threatens significantly both the federal treasury and our nation's national security only could successfully be combatted by "a coordinated effort of both the Government and the citizenry." S. Rep. No. 345, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. 2-3 (1986), reprinted in 1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5266, 5267-68 [hereinafter Senate Report]. Emphasizing both difficulties in detecting fraud that stem largely from the unwillingness of insiders with relevant knowledge of fraud to come forward, see id. at 4, reprinted in 1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 5269, and "the lack of resources on the part of Federal enforcement agencies" that often leaves unaddressed "[a]llegations that perhaps could develop into very significant cases," id. at 7, reprinted in 1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 5272, Congress sought to "increase incentives, financial and otherwise, for private individuals to bring suits on behalf of the Government," id. at 2, reprinted in 1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 5267. Congress's overall intent, therefore, was "to encourage more private enforcement suits. " Id. at 23, quoted in 1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 5288-89; see also Killingsworth, 25 F.3d at 721 ("The amended Act `increased incentives, financial and otherwise, for private Page 8 of 8

Beale v. McClure

individuals to bring suits on behalf of the Government.'" (quoting Senate Report, supra, at 2, reprinted in 1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 5267)). The importance of the Act's incentive effect is evidenced clearly in the revised Act's structure. A relator who properly brings a claim will generally receive a share of the recovery as well as eligibility for attorneys' fees and costs. See 31 U.S.C.A. S 3730(d) (West Supp. 1994). This is true even if the government decides to intervene and conducts the action itself, see id. S 3730(d)(1), or elects to pursue its claim in an administrative proceeding, see id. S 3730(c)(5). The right to recovery clearly exists primarily to give relators incentives to bring claims.*fn8 Moreover, the extent of the recovery is tied to the importance of the relator's participation in the action and the relevance of the information brought forward.*fn9 This demonstrates not only the importance of the incentive effect, but that Congress wished to create the greatest incentives for those relators best able to pursue claims that the government could not, and bring forward information that the government could not obtain. The Act's jurisdictional provisions also demonstrate Congress's concern with maintaining adequate incentives for those who materially would advance the goals of revealing fraud and supplementing government enforcement efforts. Under the Act, if an action is "based upon the public disclosure of allegations or transactions in" certain specified proceedings, reports, or mediums, a qui tam action cannot be brought unless the relator "is an original source of the information" on which the allegations are based. 31 U.S.C.A. S 3730(e)(4)(A) (West Supp. 1994). We held in Wang that "section 3730(e)(4)(A) requires a qui tam plaintiff to have played some part in his allegation's original public disclosure." Wang, 975 F.2d at 1418. Reviewing the history of the Act's jurisdictional provisions and the concerns that led Congress to amend the Act in 1986, we concluded that "Congress wanted in 1986 what it apparently thought it had in 1943: a law requiring that the relator be the original source of the government's information." Id. at 1419 (emphasis in original). We therefore held that engrafting a requirement that "a qui tam plaintiff . . . have played some part in his allegation's original public disclosure," id. at 1418, was in accord with Congress's purpose "of encouraging private individuals who are aware of fraud being perpetuated against the Government to bring such information forward," id. at 1419 (internal quotations omitted)), because it "`discourages persons with relevant information from remaining silent and encourages them to report such information at the earliest possible time,'" id. (quoting United States ex rel. Dick v. Long Island Lighting Co., 912 F.2d 13, 18 (2d Cir. 1990)). Creating incentives for those with knowledge of fraud to come forward was not Congress's sole objective. In carefully crafting provisions that specify the relator's recovery and in amending the jurisdictional provisions, it is clear that Congress attempted "to walk a fine line between encouraging whistle-blowing and discouraging opportunistic behavior." Quinn, 14 F.3d at 651. Moreover, once a claim is filed, it is clear that an important Page 9 of 9

Beale v. McClure

concern is ensuring that the United States' rights are not prejudiced by the relator's conducting of the action. That is why the government can object to a settlement between a relator and defendant when the settlement might be structured artificially to defeat the United States' right to recovery. See Killingworth, 25 F.3d at 723-25. That is also why the government retains the right to intervene for good cause and to reduce substantially the relator's role. See 31 U.S.C.A. S 3730(c). The private right of recovery created by the qui tam provisions of the FCA exists not to compensate the qui tam relator, but the United States. The relator's right to recovery exists solely as a mechanism for deterring fraud and returning funds to the federal treasury. See Kelly, 9 F.3d at 760. Therefore, qui tam actions exist only to vindicate the public interest. TITLE 42, U.S.C., SECTION 3631 Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, by force or threat of force willfully injures, intimidates or interferes with, or attempts to injure, intimidate or interfere with-(a) any person because of his race, color, religion, sex, handicap (as such term is defined in section 3602 of this title), familial status (as such term is defined in section 3602 of this title), or national origin and because he is or has been selling, purchasing, renting, financing, occupying, or contracting or negotiating for the sale, purchase, rental, financing or occupation of any dwelling, or applying for or participating in any service, organization, or facility relating to the business of selling or renting dwellings; or (b) any person because he is or has been, or in order to intimidate such person or any other person or any class of persons from-(1) participating, without discrimination on account of race, color, religion, sex, handicap (as such term is defined in section 3602 of this title), familial status (as such term is defined in section 3602 of this title), or national origin, in any of the activities, services, organizations or facilities described in subsection (a) of this section; or /s/ Sharon Anderson Attorney Pro Se Legal Challenge to Redunan(sp)Rules IFP’s on File re IRS Form 1040A Disclosure,Privacy,Paperwork Reduction Act

Page 10 of 10

Beale v. McClure

. ECF_P165913 Pacer: sa1299 Legal Domicile 1058 Summit/PO Box 4384 St.Paul, MN 55104-0384 “taken” 1988 without Quiet Title or Just Compensation Submitted for Filings 62cv10-112, Original_Objections Denied Mar.18th 2010

In the Saint Paul City Council Agenda thurs,July5,2007
Page 11 of 11

Beale v. McClure

Items 35 Resolution Assessments 07-601“from May17 to June12th,2007 public hearing Aug.15th,07 (GS3041156) Notice to combine with Item 51 Res.Ratifying Assessments 07-609 from 12Apr to 27Apr07 (J0707A Notice to remove from Agenda refer To City or County Attorneys Notice of Damages over ½ Million Dollars State of Minnesota, County of Ramsey, City of St. Paul Owner- Taxpayer Co Dist.File#J0707AJ0708A:Assm.#8337 697 Surrey ID 32-29-22-41-0053
VA Widow Candidate Ward (2) Sharon Anderson aka Peterson-Scarrella ,Attorney Pro Se: Private Attorney General Decedant , all others similarily situated Quitam Whistleblower-Fidicuary Watchdog Victim vs. St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman,DSI and Bob Kessler,Joel Essling and 168 employees, union Supervisory, John Choi, all agents,city attorneys,assigns, in their personal and official capacities, executive branch Kathy Lantry as President of the City Council,enbanc Thune,Bostrom,Harris,Benanav,Montgomery,helgen,her agents,assigns specifically shari moore, Marcia moermond,enbanc in the legislative branch in their personal,official capacities, sued individually, severally, John Doe and Mary Roe. Matt Smith ) Relatees Relator

Page 12 of 12