November 3, 2007 Minister of Public Safety Hon. Stockwell Day Day.S@parl.gc.

ca Dear Stockwell Day I very much appreciate the letter signed by you however informative it does not address the issues. A Public Inquiry is most definitely required on the public side, point of view as these puppet Task Forces only address the issues of continuity in covering up the conspiracy against the people perpetrated by the Attorney General's Office and ultimately the government of Canada, all at the tax payers expense I have watched you on CPAC and have had good vibes about you, but unfortunately sanity tells me the smoother you are the further you will climb in the government ranks but I also allow for naïve ignorance too as the police believing they are quite intelligent as they are told at the beginning of their careers that the law has nothing to do with common sense which should be the first clue as they train to be ignorant detectives. They just fall in line and when controversial topics come up like mine they consult with the Attorney General or his agents, Crown Attorneys but ultimately they must lay the charges and in the issues I have addressed the Ontario Attorney General is the major player in the conspiracy against the people which the evidence I have accumulated over the passed 2 years irrefutably proves which I am sure you are well aware of. This would be a venture into incurable absurdity questioning Michael Bryant if it is okay to charge him with conspiracy and treason. It is quite possible he would say sure go ahead and then when the ball is in his court he can decide whether or not to prosecute himself, for he gets the final decision. Anyway what would be the point of consulting with the Attorney General who would obviously state I was confused and didn’t have a clue about the law and if the cops had the slightest understanding other than what they are told and what they see happen in court over and over again as their officers crawl away with their heads between their toes frustrated as hell knowing full well the evidence met the criteria of common sense which they still haven’t got the grasp of the law being nothing to do with common sense. How the hell can laws be obeyed if they have nothing to do with common sense and who benefits when that is the case other than lawyers who have infested the whole legal system with the people trusting that they will keep an eye on each other when in fact the people should have each others backs watching the every move of these crooks as they ravish the moral civilization as they sleep peacefully in trust.

1

Sure at the moment it seems like I have ventured into a trek of superfluous futility greater than the challenge Christopher Columbus had getting ships to prove the world was round but it was an eventuality that had to happen simply because the world is round, spherical to be more correct. You know as well as I do the evidence I have is irrefutable and if it ever gets out to the public it will be supported by everything in reality and obviously due the most serious nature of the issues you people are quite confident it will never see the light of day and should there be signs of it nearing the light my lights will be turned off which is no particular concern to me being an old 65 with my eventuality approaching in any event. That fact alone must surely tell you I am not addressing the issues for me or financial gain but for the purpose that is long over due being done and if not for so many fitting circumstances that perchanced upon me I would be golfing, fishing and whatever my perceptions would be of the heavenly thing to partake in. My Dick and Janeing you people is so obvious to Spot as is your responses which may appear intelligent alone but when related to the evidence and the issues you address are abundantly incompetent to the test and yet obviously would be judged by the system in place as sane in the insane world you people have created. The evidence which I have presented you all proves irrefutably it would go nowhere in the present illegal system but a jury of the people could cause a most serious ruckus which is definitely not my intention for I am a sane and moral person who has kept his head when all around have lost theirs. Do you have any idea what it feels like to be the only sane person in the world and when the term common sense is used it is in reference to my way of thinking. Sure it is a high improbability that I will get the information out and perchance I do I will probably be certified insane but history will know the document to mean I was sane as they peruse the insanity of the intelligence of man induced by the government to ransack us poor ignorant fools. I will tend to go on hoping to strike a chord perchance there is one amongst you who would pick up on the necessity of giving sanity a chance before it is too late which is quite possibly already a wee bit too late. Well enough of the rambling for now as I bring your attention to the 2 attachments which I have already circulated the Do your part.doc file. I now make it abundantly clear that I want you to address the issues within these documents, the aforesaid and the “Boomerang Democracy Resolve” FFF, Forthright, Forthcoming, Forthwith consistent with The Law, the supreme law of Canada, the Constitution Act 1982 whereas 25 years ago the individual’s Charter Rights and Freedoms were guaranteed by the Federal government but they have not put a modus operandi in place conducive to the

2

guarantee and in fact have put a system in place conducive to the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada who hold every position in the legal system who the Law Society adamantly state or imply their members do not give a damn about the individuals guaranteed Charter Rights which my evidence irrefutably attests to. Our Rights are guaranteed and are attached to the individual as an arm and a leg yet it’s like pulling teeth to access them. The lawyers charge us every time we care to access what is already ours and the system is too costly making justice prohibitive for the moral majority. The people finance the system to protect us as per our Charter Rights and then charge us individually when we try to access the system which is a venture into futility trying to find justice from members of the Law Society who don’t give a damn about our Charter Rights Now what the hell is that all about? Yes, I am requesting a response to that question most definitely The lawyers have built an empire from our tax money for their benefit and the evidence is everywhere in reality and irrefutable within the contents of my writings which the people whose e-mails are listed below have received.

I have also requested on many occasions, an answer to a very simple question from the prominent people in matters of law whose e-mail addresses you will also find on page 15 of the Do your part.doc which now includes your Day.S@parl.gc.ca address. I ask you all once again what the entity “threshold” means in matters of the law you people administer and enforce in Canada. In particular I would like to know what the term “threshold” means in reference to the evidence I presented to you all in the Toronto Sun document dated October 8 2006 which the York Regional Police and Randy Craig of the OPP Anti-Rackets refer to as the invisible delineator which the judge pulls from his or her hat to determine that my irrefutable evidence did not chin the line considered to be the “threshold” which determines whether or not they can commence or cause to commence proceedings in the provincial courts? The answer is obvious as is the no response to the question as is the refusal of all the aforesaid people to bring the issues I have addressed to the public’s attention. I request each and every individual whose e-mail address is on page 15 of the attached document, “Do your part.doc(582KB)” to please respond to the “threshold” question The playing intelligently ignorant option has worn thin so I suggest demonstrating another one of your initiatives to appear FFF.

3

Oh, it would be prudent to mention that the (4) Click on Preamble Federal correspondence Recap October 9 2007 not valid Re:published http://www.scribd.com/doc/43467649/PreambleFederalcorrespondenceRecap-October-9-2007 on page 11 of the Do your part.doc which is to be found on my web site Guardians of the Canadians Charter of Rights and Freedoms http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-andfreedoms http://www.scribd.com/doc/216559994/Guardians-of-the-Canadians-Charter-of-Rights-andFreedoms www.Frank13.com quite convincing that you all were provided the opportunity to prove your indifference to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights was fiction rather than truly the Attorney General’s fiction which is in laymen terms conspiracy and treason when the people willingly refuse to generously suspend their disbelief as per page 2 of the document behind the black bar which is to be found on page 8 of the aforesaid Do your part.doc I state once again as I have many times before, Do not befuddle the befuddlement any further insulting the intelligence of our right to be ignorant of the fiction of the traditionally unscrupulous ways of the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada who are so bloody arrogant in their belief they are superior to God in their most devilish ways.

Hon Stockwell Day By all means inform me as to who else agrees with the no need for a Public Inquiry into the RCMP pension fund scandal which was linked to the upper command and the DOJ I noticed you copied your response to the DOJ confirming for me that he is aware of the issues and the media confirms for me that he has done nothing to address these issues which are of a most serious nature which Louis Theoret, Federal Ombudsman of Victims of Crime understands which you will read in the Preamble Federal correspondence Recap October 9 2007 document http://www.scribd.com/doc/43467649/-PreambleFederalcorrespondenceRecap-October-92007 Clearly the DOJ, Department of Justice He closed the file leaving predictable victims at the mercy of the conspiracy. With reference to your following statement with full respect for Canada’s democratic traditions I dare say Canada’s democratic traditions are passe’ as of 1982 when the individual’s Rights were guaranteed by the Charter necessitating a revamp of the legal system so as to be competent to back the guarantee consistent with and conducive to the provisions of the Charter

4

You state you are accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP and must ensure the Force functions with full respect for the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians and clearly the evidence shows that Sgt. Michael Thomson of the RCMP was provided copies of Lawyer Files 1-14, 13A of which lawyer File # 14 was addressed to him dated April 7 2007 which he has refused to respond to. On October 18 2007 I and my mother went to the RCMP office on Harry Walker Blvd. south of Davis drive with a prodigious amount of evidence which included copies of the 15 Lawyer Files, the 73 page letter to the Toronto Sun dated October 8 2006 and a copy of the Dave Grech compiled correspondence September 1 2007 and a copy of the recording of the Tribunal hearing which irrefutably proves that Don Wilson filed a false and misleading information with the ORHT valued at $43,000 + which is an offense under S.206 (2) of the Tenant protection Act, 1997 and committed the criminal act of fraud over $100,000 in a public building financed by the people of Ontario to administer justice to and for the people in compliance with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and the criminal code of the Constitution Act, 1982. Sgt Steinebeck met with us for about an hour and declined to take the evidence, which I had brought because the RCMP web site stated they would not accept evidence by e-mail which I had provided all the evidence to Sgt Michael Thomson by e-mail but he had declined to respond to it. Sgt.Steinebech admitted he knew of me when I questioned him about a half hour into our meeting and he went on to state that he already had copies of all the documents I had brought because they had received them by e-mail and opened a file for them. So the big question is why have they not commenced or caused to commence proceedings against Rick Hennessey, Regional Director of the ORHT as per Lawyer File # 1, of tampering with the evidence and refusing to file the afore mentioned charges against Don Wilson which makes Rick Hennessey guilty of Obstruction of a landlord in pursuit of his rights under s. 206 (1) of the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and obstruction of justice in the matter of the criminal act of fraud under the Constitution Act 1982. Dave Grech of the Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs also declined to file the charges as above and referred to in Lawyer File # 2 addressed to him. Hon. John Gerretsen Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing also refused to commence or cause to commence proceedings on these issues as addressed to him in Lawyer File # 3 making him guilty of the same charges as above and more as referred to in the said Lawyer File # 3 which also includes matters of non consistencies with the Constitution. The evidence also points to the same charges against the Attorney General Michael Bryant in Lawyer File # 7 and conspiracy against the people along with other matters regarding non compliance with the Constitution Act, 1982.

5

Everyone else referenced in the 15 Lawyer Files are also guilty of conspiracy against the people and obstruction of justice under the Constitution Act 1982, They have all received the evidence and have also been informed that should they have misplaced it they can find it on my web site Guardians of the Canadians Charter of Rights and Freedoms http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-andfreedoms www.Frank13.com So you see “As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP and must ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s democratic traditions and the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians.” I believe you are accountable to the public for the RCMP failure to function with full respect for my Charter Rights and Freedoms which are truly fundamental. I take you at your word that you will ensure that the RCMP functions consistent with the Constitution and conducive to my guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms and every other individual of Canada whose guaranteed protection is dependent on punishment due the crime attentive to deterrence which is the first line of defense in the guaranteed protection of the people. If you should require any more evidence than that which has been provided to Sgt. Michael Thomson of the RCMP please do not hesitate to request by e-mail at franklyone@hotmail.com frankly1@rogers.com I trust you understand the serious nature of the issues regarding the conspiracy by the Attorney General Michael Bryant and the evidence irrefutably proves the Ontario Government does not have a modus operandi in place capable of backing the individual’s Charter Rights and Freedoms and in fact the modus operandi in place is conducive to the benefit of the lawyers and criminal element extremely detrimental to the moral majority. Once again I state the evidence is all available on my web site Guardians of the Canadians Charter of Rights and Freedoms http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadianscharter-of-rights-and-freedoms where you will find links to 9 other web sites which contain the irrefutable evidence of the Attorney General conspiracy. www.Frank13.com A Public Inquiry is in order and I request you do so FFF Frank Gallagher Frank Gallagher Cc Day.S@parl.gc.ca victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca;Michael.Thomson@rcmprc.gc.ca;prevention@ps.gc.ca;randy.craig@jus.gov.on.ca; communications@ps.gc.ca;McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca;ahorwath-

6

qp@ndp.on.ca;bakerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; brooksn@scc-csc.gc.ca;bill.murdoch@pc.ola.org; bob.runciman@pc.ola.org;bironmi@sen.parl.gc.ca;baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca;comail@lsuc.ca;cit ytvhosts@citytv.com;citydesk@tor.sunpub.com;city@thestar.ca; christine.elliott@pc.ola.org;cowanj@sen.parl.gc.ca;cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca;dhowlett@makepo vertyhistory.ca;dinovocqp@ndp.on.ca;dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca;dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca;debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca;dayja@se n.parl.gc.ca; dawsod@sen.parl.gc.ca;editor@rd.ca;editor@tor.sunpub.com;elizabeth.witmer@pc.ola.org;eg glea@sen.parl.gc.ca;ernie.hardeman@pc.ola.org;fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca;frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca; fortim@sen.parl.gc.ca; fitzpr@sen.parl.gc.ca;fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca;gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca;grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;golds y@sen.parl.gc.ca;gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca;gautht@sen.parl.gc.ca;gcarlino@ombudsman.on.ca;hu blee@sen.parl.gc.ca; hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca;haysd@sen.parl.gc.ca;harbm@sen.parl.gc.ca;joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca;joh nsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca;jcrivest@sen.parl.gc.ca;julia.munroco@pc.ola.org;k fl@sen.parl.gc.ca; kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca;kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca; lachah@sen.parl.gc.ca;losier@sen.parl.gc.ca;lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca;lavigr@sen.parl.gc.ca;co mmunications@ps.gc.ca;mcgeed@sen.parl.gc.ca;munsoj@sen.parl.gc.ca;moorew@sen.parl.gc .ca;mitchg@sen.parl.gc.ca; milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca;merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca;mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca;meighen@sen.parl.gc.c a; mccoye@sen.parl.gc.ca;massip@sen.parl.gc.ca;mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca;nejmcust@mms.org;n imhinfo@nih.gov; mbryant.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mininfo@mah.gov.on.ca;nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca; onbox@ps.gc.ca;olived@sen.parl.gc.ca;pm@pm.gc.ca;pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca;prudhm@sen. parl.gc.ca;poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca; poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca;phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca;pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca;pkormosqp@ndp.on.ca;stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca;stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca;stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca;spivam@sen .parl.gc.ca;smithd@sen.parl.gc.ca; sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca;smithc@sen.parl.gc.ca;szwebmaster@yahoo.com;tkachd@sen.parl.gc.c a;tardic@sen.parl.gc.ca;vanlop0@parl.gc.ca;vanlop1@parl.gc.ca;web@ps.gc.ca;webadmin@j ustice.gc.ca;wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca; whistleblower@ctv.ca; zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca; info@cjcccm.gc.ca rbartolucci.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; cbentley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mbountrogianni.mpp@liberal.ola.org; jbradley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcansfield.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcaplan.mpp@liberal.ola.org; machambers.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; cdicocco.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; ldombrowsky.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dduncan.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; mkwinter.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mmeilleur.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; speters.mpp@liberal.ola.org; gphillips.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; spupatello.mpp@liberal.ola.org; lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; pfonseca.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; htakhar.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; dramsay.mpp.kirklandlake@liberal.ola.org;gsmitherman.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gsorbara.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; vdhillon.mpp@liberal.ola.org;

7

bduguid.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kflynn.mpp@liberal.ola.org; ljeffrey.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kkular.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mcolle.mpp@liberal.ola.org; jbrownell.mpp@liberal.ola.org;bbalkissoon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; warthurs.mpp@liberal.ola.org;Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca; Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca; MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca; Day.S@parl.gc.ca; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca;Toews.V@parl.gc.ca;Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca; Finley.D@parl.gc.ca; pm@pm.gc.ca; OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca; Oda.B@parl.gc.ca; Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca; Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca; Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca; Clement.T@parl.gc.ca; Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca; Verner.J@parl.gc.ca; Hill.J@parl.gc.ca; Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca; Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca; Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca;dwatch@web.net;info@ocsj.ca; ocap@tao.ca;info@olderwomensnetwork.org; terryoc2001@yahoo.ca; adavidov@torontohabitat.on.ca; justice@socialjustice.org;info@chfc.ca sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; robin.roberts@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca; AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; potterl@scccsc.gc.ca;phil.jensen@servicecanada.gc.ca;AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; josee.dubois@pssttdfp.gc.ca; elisabeth.nadeau@ps.gc.ca; mmacpherson@pco-bcp.gc.ca; dgrandmaitre@gg.ca; tpulcine@privcom.gc.ca; aleadbea@infocom.gc.ca; clgascon@fja.gc.ca; plourded@naftasec-alena.org; francois-giroux@cas-satj.gc.ca;bob.ward@chrc-ccdp.cadp.ca Minister of Public Safety Ministre de a Sécurité publique Ottawa, Canada K1A 0P8 OCT 2 g 2007 Mr. Frank Gallagher frank.gaIIaghersympatico.ca Dear Mr. Gallagher: Thank you for your correspondence of July 19, 2007, regarding the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) pension fund as well as your concerns that rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms are not being protected. I apologize for the delay in responding. As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP and must ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s democratic traditions and the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians. The Government is committed to a high standard of transparency and accountability and is taking action to ensure government business is conducted in a responsible manner. In order to deliver on its commitment to make Government more accountable, on April 11, 2006, Canada’s new Government introduced the Federal Accountability Act, which received Royal Assent on December 12, 2006. Through this Act, the Government of Canada has introduced specific measures to help strengthen accountability and increase transparency and oversight in

8

Government operations. To clarify roles and responsibilities, the Federal Accountability Act designates Deputy Ministers and Deputy Heads such as the Commissioner of the RCMP as accounting officers who are accountable before the appropriate committee of Parliament to answer questions related to their responsibilities. Canada -2The RCMP is an important national institution that plays a significant role in the safety and security of Canadians; ensuring public trust and confidence is an important component of achieving that role. Canada’s new Government has taken a number of recent steps in respect of this important national institution. On April 13, 2007, Mr. David Brown was appointed to lead an independent investigation into allegations relating to the RCMP pension and insurance plans. The mandate for this investigation gave Mr. Brown the flexibility to recommend whether a more formal inquiry was necessary to address any outstanding questions. In his report, submitted to the Government on June 15, 2007, Mr. Brown recommended that no formal inquiry was necessary. I have closely reviewed Mr. Brown’s report and have accepted all of his recommendations. On July 16, 2007, the Government announced the creation of a five-member Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP, to be chaired by Mr. David Brown. In addition to the appointment of Mr. Brown as Chair, Linda Black, Richard Drouin, Norman Inkster, and Larry Murray — each with varied expertise and experience — have been appointed as members of the Task Force. The Task Force will make recommendations to improve management and accountability within the RCMP, and will report back to the Government by the end of 2007. Furthermore, the appointment of William J.S. Elliott as the new Commissioner of the RCMP, with a career that has been marked with distinction as well as expertise in the area of national security, will provide the RCMP with the renewed leadership that it critically needs at this time. With respect to the criminal allegations under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 mentioned in your letter, please note that criminal matters in Ontario fall within the purview of the Honourable Michael Bryant, Attorney General of Ontario. You may therefore wish to raise your concerns with his office, using the contact information provided below: Ministry of the Attorney General McMurtry-Scott Building 720 Bay Street, 11th Floor Toronto, Ontario M5G 2K1 Telephone: 416-326-2220 -3With respect to your concerns about the application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, I have taken the liberty of forwarding a copy of your correspondence to my colleague the Honourable Rob Nicholson, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, for his information and consideration. In addition, a copy of your correspondence has been forwarded to Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner. I regret that I cannot help in the way you had perhaps hoped, but wish you well in resolving your concerns. Yours sincerely,

9

c.c.: The Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P. Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Q.C. Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. Minister of Public Safety

I am well aware of the Federal Accountability Act,2006 and in fact have written the Prime Minister Stephen Harper, providing him with evidence which his office responded hoping I understand why his office can not get involved. I do not understand why his office can not get involved unless of course his office is involved with the conspiracy which clearly the evidence shows must be by not getting involved. A copy of his Office’s e-mail can be found in the Government Correspondence compiled September 1 2007 which is referenced in the afore said Preamble Federal correspondence Recap October 9 2007 document

The afore mentioned document clearly shows: the Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P. Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada has been informed along with everyone else who I have mentioned and clearly nothing has been done to address these most serious issues. You yourself Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. Minister of Public Safety are aware that The Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P. Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada has been informed as you clearly state in your response to me dated November 2 2007 and a copy is hereto copied immediately above with the date incorrectly noted OCT 2 g 2007 Clearly the DOJ is implicated in this conspiracy as well as the RCMP Pension Fund scandal which the Standing Committee of Public Accounts was ordered to sit on. You have also Cc Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Q.C. Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner and the records show I have already been there, done that but her Office had no authority to deal with the issues. Your letter of November 2 2007 confirms everything I state that you people do nothing other than a dog chasing its tail which certainly appears busy and attentive to something but if it weren’t for the coincidental consistent movement of head and tail its head would be found stuffed firmly up its ass. The evidence is clear that the Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP, to be chaired by Mr. David Brown. In addition to the appointment of Mr. Brown as Chair, Linda Black, Richard Drouin, Norman Inkster, and Larry Murray will accomplish absolutely nothing other than to appear as if they are benefiting the public as is the Fiction of the

10

Attorney General which does nothing but provide members of the Law Society with luxurious benefit to the colossal waste of tax payers money. The accountability and responsibility has already been defined in the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” on the Ontario Attorney General web site and common law and common sense demands the guarantor of the guarantee to the individual’s Charter Rights and Freedoms as provided in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is the responsible and accountable party to back the guarantee which is the Federal Government and clearly The Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P. Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada is mandated with that obligation. If not he, then who? That seems to be the gazzilion $ question. “The Government is committed to a high standard of transparency and accountability and is taking action to ensure government business is conducted in a responsible manner.” BULLSHIT To cite a man of wisdom from 2500 years ago ….Confucius says “There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY….finally I began to make out what was written between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”

Mr. Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. Minister of Public Safety On this 3rd day of November 2007 under the authority of the Constitution Act, 1982 (Document) with due regard to Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms charge you to uphold your responsibility to which you will be held accountable by the people. “As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP and must ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s democratic traditions and the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians.” The RCMP have been provided the evidence as have you and all the people whose e-mail addresses I have provided and I insist on behalf of the people that you commence or cause to commence proceedings for the restructuring of the antiquated legal system that has been superseded by the 1982 enactment of the Constitution which demands a modus operandi consistent with and conducive to the guarantee of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Common sense and all that’s sane demands government personnel be irreproachable in this endeavor FFF, Forthright, Forthcoming, Forthwith and I will tentatively presume you are the

11

man for this most significant job in this moment of time in history where it is absolutely vital to the well being and safety of the people of Canada As Minister of Public Safety Mr. Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. it is incumbent upon you to lead the way in the interests of each and every person in Canada who is individually guaranteed Rights as provided by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom and you must do so with integrity, fortitude and conviction FFF attentive to, consistent with and conducive to the guarantee to each and every individual of Canada as per the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The present legal system is extraordinarily incompetent to that endeavor to the humongous waste of tax dollars to the horrific detriment to the people of Canada who finance the system for their benefit of a moral society under the supremacy of God. It matters not if you believe God exists or ever did for when you have exercised your responsibilities under the supremacy of God we will all be believers as the spirit of God and the spirit of The Law is one and the same.

I reiterate a continuity of the befuddlement will not be tolerated giving due cause to commence proceedings against every individual of the present government personnel who has been granted authority under the Constitution to administer and enforce it consistent with and conducive to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom consistent with the aspirations attributed to God clearly defined in Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms 1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. 2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association. 7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect. Whatever the cost to the taxpayer to this endeavor will be money most well spent.

12

I remind you attentiveness to efficiency and effect is demanded as per 7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. The public have been deprived for far too long and it to this endeavor I do not see the benefit to dwelling on the past which the legal system has a firm grip on which has been long stretched and an immediate release will propel us far into the future. I have been FFF and I would expect and respect to be responded to in kind. Frank Gallagher Frank Gallagher PS Your immediate attention is required Are you the man for this most significant challenge? Answer would be most gratefully appreciated

www.Frank13.com

13

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful