- BW-VRT1
- Asprem (2011) Pondering Imponderables
- 6 - 29 - Combining Velocities (25-16, Low-Def)
- Particles and Waves_ Historical Essays in the Philosophy of Science
- Manifestation
- Kohl Rausch
- Maxwell's Ether and Motion,Michelson, Lorentz, Einstein
- a_16_Unsubstantiated_Relativity_Models_Dr_Burniston_Brown.pdf
- TURN 3
- January 2013 QP - Unit 6 Edexcel Physics
- 2013 Theory of Antirelativity Eric Dollard
- Theory-of-Anti-Relativity”-by-E-P-Dollard
- A Simple Test of Special Relativity and A Brief Discussion of Einstein's God Letter within the context of Krishna Stories
- As you like it
- 11310772
- Fate of Relativity When Something Which Travel Faster Than Light Is Discovered
- NSEP-2017 Solved Answers
- physics-c-equation-tables.pdf
- HW_Ch05
- IITPaper_1_2009
- A Meeting With Dr Einstein - Relativity and de Broglies wavelength
- Newton's Laws of Motion
- New Energy Technologies 2003
- HA-5,relativity
- Important Concepts 11
- Bio Centrism
- Physics 2016 Curriculum Data Booklet
- Electrollhuy
- Problemas propuestos de conversión de unidades
- Coordinate System
- Fluid Mechanics Ch-1
- Appendix i Batransmittallttr
- chapter2_impactsmitigation
- typesoffoundation-090504011758-phpapp02
- Appendix a Ceqachecklist
- Civil3d Tutorials
- WP63-SSA-Irrigation-Water_215.pdf
- chapter5_distributionlist
- chapter1_projectdescription
- chapter3_4
- Pull OutStrength
- bolt1
- se
- 148655757 Rural Water Paper II Civil Engg
- Tunnel Lining
- notes
- Three Gorges
- Basic Maths Formulae
- UNIT v Hydro Electric Plant
- Aligning of Vertical Shafts
- 12926
- Engineering Design Basis GA
- 13321_1
- 13326_1
- Bsp Vl4-Buried Penstocks
- 7356_2
- Thumb Rules
- 11130
- hydropower

An Introduction

DJM 8/01

Background

• Most basic concept of “relativity” is as old as Galilean and Newtonian Mechanics. Crudely speaking, it is: – The Laws of Physics look the same in different frames of reference – In Newtonian Relativity: This applies to Mechanics – In Einstein’s Relativity: This applies to all Laws of Physics • When applied to all laws, difficult issues arise. – Implications seem to violate intuition – masses increase, lengths are shortened, time expands • Has generated fascination, has brought glamour... – Bottom line: STR is corroborated by experiment • Until 20th century, Newton’s Laws (F = dp/dt, Fab = -Fba, conservation of energy and momentum) were held true (and still are) and absolutely believed in (not any more, as written originally)

Background

• Recall: Newton’s Laws are valid only in an “inertial” frame

– An inertial frame of reference is one in which Newton’s 1st Law holds; it exists only in empty space; it is at rest w.r.to stars)

• Basic Newtonian mechanics issue: A state of a system is specified at some time to by giving position coordinates (xo,yo,zo) and velocity (vox,voy,voz) at to. Can calculate position (x,y,z) and velocity (vx,vy,vz) at a later time t by knowing all forces acting on the system and applying Newton’s laws. • Often desirable to specify such a state in terms of a new set of coordinate axes, which is moving with respect to the first • Three important questions arise:

– How do we transform the state from the old to the new frame? i.e. How do we convert x1,y1,z1,t1 → x2,y2,z2,t2 ? – What happens to Newton’s Laws under this “transformation”? – What happens to E&M theory (Maxwell’s Equations)?

• Theory of Relativity concerns itself with these questions

Deals with the case of an inertial frame of reference moving with constant velocity with respect to another inertial frame – Its consequences are most important as v → c – The General Theory of Relativity • 1915 . • A relationship results between accelerated motion and gravitational effects • It is the current theory describing the gravitational interaction • Not based on quantum mechanics • Requires knowledge of tensor calculus .Background • Albert Einstein formulated the modern Theory of Relativity. He proposed two such theories: – The Special Theory of Relativity • 1905 .Deals with the case of an inertial frame of reference accelerating with respect to another inertial frame.

vt1 x1 = x2 + vt2 t1 = t 2 .The S1 and S2 Inertial Frames y y Event y2 y1 vt1=-vt2 x2 v = constant S1 z z S2 x1 x x x2 = x1 .

t2) • Each has own meter stick and clock • When temporarily at rest.e.z2. sticks same length. separate. clocks synchronized i.y2.y1. x2.2) are in their own. at the instant t1 = 0. then t2 = 0 and x in S1 = x in S2 – When S2 is moving with respect to S1.Newtonian Relativity (Some History) • Galilean Transformation of space-time – Two observers (1.t1. inertial frame of reference S1 and S2 • S2 moves with respect to S1 with v = constant along x-axis – Each observes the same “event” giving position and time as measured in their own frame of reference (x1. the state (x and t) of the event as seen by the two observers is related by: x2 = x1 .vt1 y2 = y1 z2 = z1 t2 = t1 v → -v gives x1 = x2 + vt2 y1 = y2 z1 = z2 t1 = t2 (S1 → S2) .z1.

Newtonian Relativity (Some History) • Transformation of velocities and accelerations follow directly by taking derivatives v2x = v1x .v and a2x = a1x v2y = v1y a2y = a1y v2z = v1z a2z = a1z – This is the Newtonian answer to Question #1 (intuitive) – Important implicit assumptions: space is absolute. for meaningful vx. therefore. time is absolute ∆x dx • Note (definition): v x = = lim etc. measurement of ∆x and ∆t must be made with respect to a single (the same) reference frame – When using Galilean Transformations this is not important because time is absolute and. t1 = t2 . dt ∆t →0 ∆t – Implies that.

(“Mechanics” looks the same in both) – Corollary: All inertial frames are equivalent. as they are derivable from 2nd Law – Note assumption: mass m is the same in both S1 and S2 i. respectively: F1 = ma1 and F2 = ma2 But a1 = a2 Therefore F1 = F2 And. let the force acting on it be measured by S1 and S2. Length.Newtonian Relativity (Some History) • All laws of mechanics are the same in all inertial frames – Example: Newton’s 2nd Law under Galilean transformation – When a mass accelerates. therefore. to another one. “invariant”).e. time and mass are independent of relative motion of the observer .r. m1 = m2 • This is Newtonian answer to Question #2 • Corollary: Impossible to prove by mechanical tests that one frame is at absolute rest rather than in motion with v = const. Newton’s 2nd Law retains its mathematical form in both inertial frames (is the same. w. All other laws of mechanics are also invariant. They find.

one should be able to measure v of this moving frame.m. waves propagating through free space with speed c = 3. then if one measures the speed of light in a frame moving w.r.Failure of Newtonian Relativity (Some More History) • Maxwell’s (4) equations describe electromagnetism successfully • Maxwell’s equations predict the existence of e.00 x 108 m/s – Question #1: With respect to what frame is c to be measured? – Question #2: Through what medium do e. – Plan: Measure earth’s speed as it moves through ether – Result: Null. waves propagate? – 19th century answer: “Ether” hypothesis . to it). to ether.existence of a massless but elastic substance permeating all space • Electromagnetic waves propagate through the ether • c is to be measured with respect to the ether – An experiment is needed to test the presence of ether! • Michelson-Morley Experiment (1881) – Premise: If one believes in the ether (and that c is 3x108 w. and in Galilean transformations for E&M.m.r. and in Maxwell’s Eqns. can not detect any motion of the earth through ether .

e. waves is moving. • Experiments support c = 3. the e. under the ether hypothesis?) – Short Answer!: No! – If they did. But: • This is contradicted by Galilean transformations. – Another problem: Maxwell’s equations seem to predict the same value for c for all inertial frames. equations would produce c+v for the speed of light (and in a moving space ship. wave is predicted to move through space with the same c. some one on the spaceship could measure the speed of the space ship) • Contradicted by Michelson-Morley experiment. electrical or optical phenomena would be different than in a stationary space ship.Failure of Newtonian Relativity (Some More History) • Implications: – Question (remember #3?): Do Maxwell’s equations obey Newtonian Relativity? (i. Therefore: • If the source of the e. then. do they stay “invariant” under Galilean transformations.m.00 x 108 m/s in all frames .m.

What to Do? • Are Maxwell’s equations not the same in all inertial frames? – Maxwell’s equations could be wrong (only 20 years old!) – If so.00 x 108 m/s – Poincare: “A total conspiracy of nature is itself a law of nature” • Einstein to the rescue: – Fruitless to continue to show experimentally that a special inertial frame exists. . experiments OK – Either hypothesis would have to be abandoned – Absolute space and absolute time would have to be abandoned • What about c? – All moving frames seem to give same value: 3. Keep looking! • Are Galilean transformations wrong? – Then. Proposes Two Postulates. keep Maxwell’s equations as they are. Galilean transformations would be retained and – Maxwell’s equations should be fixed to obey Galilean transformation and – A preferred inertial frame must exist which should produce different values for c as one moves through it.

c = 3.Special Theory of Relativity Einstein’s Two Postulates (1905) • Postulate I (Principle of Relativity) “All laws of physics must be the same (“invariant”) in all inertial reference frames” (Can not detect absolute uniform motion) • Postulate II (Constancy of c) “The speed of light in vacuum is constant (same value. regardless of motion of source or observer” .00 x 108 m/s) in all inertial reference frames.

not the other way around! • New issues arise: – Galilean transformations are abandoned • need new transformation equations – Newton’s laws don’t obey Postulate I any longer • • • • have to be changed Absolute space and absolute time must be abandoned Constancy of mass (and conservation of mass) must be abandoned Laws are OK the way they are as long as v << c – New and non-intuitive predictions appear – Experimental verification needed – Acceptance by scientific community is slow .00 x 108 m/s – No need for either • build a theory on experimental results.Some Observations • Problems solved by STR: – Keep Maxwell’s equations – Accept measurements of c. all producing 3.

t1 and t2 are intimately intertwined with x1.r. since v << c in Newtonian world • Precise new definition needed: – Two events in an inertial frame of reference are simultaneous if light signals from the locations of these events reach an observer positioned halfway between them at the same time • Consequences: – Two events simultaneous in one inertial frame are not simultaneous in another frame in motion w.to the first – t(x). t1 ≠ t2.Consequences .Simultaneity • Usual Meaning: Two events occurring at the same time • Simultaneity is not an absolute concept anymore – It depends on motion of the observer – Taken for granted in Newtonian physics • But it doesn’t matter. x2 .

S1 will measure the time interval again. Call it T1 . and returns to the origin. to them! – Consider the duration (time interval T) of an “event” – Let “event” be: a light ray goes from the origin of S2 to a mirror at y2 = d.Time Dilation • Clocks slow down when seen by observer moving w. at a fixed location) is: y y 2d = = T T Next: let S2 move along x-axis of 01 02 Mirror c d v=0 x zz S S1 2 x S1 with v = constant. using their own clocks and meter sticks. the duration of the round trip (“proper time”. i. measured in the rest frame of the event. both agree.r.e. is reflected there.Consequences . – If S1 and S2 are momentarily at rest.

is T1 = 2t. light sent by S2 follows path shown. taking time t to get from the origin of S2 to the mirror and back • New time interval T1.2 c z S1 z z x x x Since γ ≥ 1 always. ⇒ T1 ≥ T02 S2 (Relativistic T > Proper T) .Consequences . T ∴ = 1 c c2 − v2 1 1− v c2 2 or y y T1 = γT02 where γ = ct vt vt ct v = constant 1 v2 1.Time Dilation • As seen by S1. where (ct ) y 2 = d 2 + (vt ) solve for t : t = 2 d 2d . measured by S1.

2 x 10-6 s. the life time of the dilated (“non-proper” time interval): – Since a high energy (relativistic) then τ = γ τo µ is γ >> 1 and τ >> τo µ has speed v → c – Therefore it has enough time to reach the earth and be observed . in its “rest frame”) the has (average) lifetime τo = 2.Time Dilation Example: Muon (µ) Lifetime • When at rest in the laboratory (i. before it decays.e. ~10 km up. – At the speed of light it would travel ~600 m before decaying µ • We know µ are produced high in the atmosphere. from collisions of cosmic rays with the atmosphere • How are we able to observe them on the earth? – As measured by an earth based observer.

sees the star moving with -v.Length Contraction • A length gets shortened when measured by observer in motion with respect to it! – Consider the length between the earth and a star. (T1 is “non-proper” T). at fixed place) it takes to reach the star and computes distance (“non-proper” L) to be: L2 = vT02 – The two time measurements are related by T1 = γT02 – Therefore.Consequences . at rest in S2. or: L2 = L 01 γ ∴ Since γ > 1 always. – A space ship (S2) travels from the earth to the star moving with constant speed v along x-axis of an observer at rest on the earth (S1) – Earth observer measures the distance to the star L01 (“proper length”) and computes the time it takes for the space ship (the moving frame) to get there as T1 = L01/v. – Space ship observer. substituting T02 in L2: L2 = vT1/γ. ⇒ L2 < L01 (Relativistic L < Proper L) . measures time T02 (“proper time”.

will get there alive and well. to earth (γ = 3.2*32.r. astronaut will be and feel 25 + 32.g. T1 = γT02 = 3. computes contracted length) • Therefore.8 = 57. • Earth observer computes: T1 = L01/v = 100yr/0. heart beat) and other processes on spaceship will “slow down” as seen by earth observer .Length Contraction Example: Human Space Travel • A 25 year-old astronaut wishes to travel from earth to Alpha Pegasus (distance L0 = 100 lt yr away). (e. using a fast spaceship – Will he/she get there in his/her lifetime? • Use v = 0. computes dilated time interval).8 years old upon arrival.2) • Astronaut measures T02 = L2/v = (L0/γ)v = 100/(3.95c for spaceship speed w.95) = 32.2*0.95yr/ltyr = 105 yr for astronaut to get there.8 = 105 yr – Biological.8 yr (measures proper time interval. (measures proper length.

x2 = γ(x1 . Form 2 .t1) → (x2.t2) • Assume relativistic transformation for x1 → x2 is the same as the classical one except for an unknown constant γ. Substitute γ in (1). (2). therefore.Lorentz Transformations • Recall.z1. Substitute x2 from (1) in (2) and solve for t2 x1 − γ 2 (x1 − vt1 ) ∆x ∆x 2 ∆x1 = = c (Postulate II) t2 = (3).y1.vt1) (1) and x1 = γ(x2 + vt2) (2) y2 = y1 z2 = z1 t2 = ? y1 = y2 z1 = z2 t1 = ? • γ must be the same in both equations (Postulate I).z2. Galilean transformations are not valid when v → c • Need new equations to transform (x1.y2. Set ∆t 2 ∆t 2 ∆t1 γv γ= 1 v2 1− 2 c • Solve for γ. (3) and get final result: .

– As v → 0. are good enough for Newtonian Mechanics • v > c produces imaginary. • Therefore c becomes a limiting speed for physical phenomena . non-physical numbers. G. – Therefore.Lorentz Transformations x2 = x 1 − vt 1 v2 1− 2 c y 2 = y1 x1 = x 2 + vt 2 v2 1− 2 c y1 = y 2 t2 + vx 2 c2 v2 1− 2 c z 2 = z1 vx 1 2 c t2 = v2 1− 2 c t1 − or z1 = z 2 t1 = • Note: Lorentz Transformations are valid for any v. they reduce to the Galilean Transformations. T.

if v = c in one frame. v −v v 2x = 1x v 1 − 2 v1x c v1y v 2y = v γ1 − 2 v1x c v1z v 2z = v γ1 − 2 v1x c or v 2x + v v 1 + 2 v 2x c v 2y v1y = v γ1 + 2 v 2x c v 2z v1z = v γ1 + 2 v 2x c v1x = • If v2x = c. then v1x = c – i. then v = c in any frame • These equations refer to measurements done in different frames.Lorentz Transformation of Velocities • By differentiation.e. Vector addition of velocities in the same frame remain the same .

let S2 be spaceship A.80c • “Event” is spaceship B.80c with respect to the Earth • How fast is each ship moving with respect to the other? – i.80c in S1 • Speed vB2 of spaceship B (event) relative to A (S2) is: v B2 = v B1 − v .80c – 0. moving w.80c ) v v − 1 − B1 1 c2 c2 • Note: vB2 ≠ (Galilean) vB1 – v = -0.0.6c .80c = = −0.Lorentz Transformation of Velocities Example • Two spaceships A and B approach the Earth from opposite directions • Each ship moves with v = 0.r.to S1 with speed v = +0.80c − 0.e.80c )(0. moving with speed vB1 = -0.0.98c (.80c = -1. what is the speed of one spaceship measured in the rest frame of the other? • Must establish S1 and S2: Let S1 be the earth.

independent of relative motion between object and observer. m = γm ∴ Since γ > 1 always. They must be changed • Experiment shows that Newton’s Laws: – Force laws (with p = mv) – Conservation of energy – Conservation of momentum may retain their (mathematical) form IF the classical concept of mass is modified: m ≠ constant. that is: – A mass m moving with speed v with respect to an observer is different than the mass m0 of the same object when at rest with respect to the observer (“proper mass” or “rest mass”) • Can show: m = m0 or. ⇒ m > m 0 v2 1− 2 (Relativistic m > Proper m) c . let: m = m(v). Conservation of mass is abandoned! • In relativistic physics.Relativistic Dynamics • Newton’s Laws are invariant under Galilean transformations but not under Lorentz transformations.

01c (∆v = 0. even a small ∆v requires a large F to produce it. where Relativistic Mass. then : Second Law of Motion • Note: As v → c and m >> m0.98c to v = 0. ∆p =2.Relativistic Dynamics • Newton’s Laws (now relativistically correct): r r K = W = ∫0 F ⋅ d s Definition of Work. Example: – Going from v = 0 to v = 0.01c). Therefore F is 210 times more in the second case • What about Energy/Conservation of Energy? . K.01c). Going from v = 0.10m0c (or 210 times more).E.010m0c.99c (same ∆v = 0. r r [Σpi ] initial = [Σpi ] final Conservation of Momentum s r r p = mv m = γm r r dp F= dt 0 New Definition of Momentum. ∆p = 0.

∴ E = mc2 from (1).m0)c2 = γm0c2 . E = K + E0 = mc2 = γm0c2 = γE0 .Relativistic Energy • Kinetic Energy (in one dimension): m0 v v m0 vdv v v v v dp m0 c 2 2 K = ∫0 Fds = ∫0 ds = ∫0 vdp = ∫0 vd m c = = − ∫0 0 2 2 2 dt v v v 3 1− 1− 1− 2 c c2 c2 • Or: K = mc2 . i. ∴ E0 = m0c2 – No classical equivalent. m0c2 = m(v=0) • Interpret m(v=0) as “Rest Energy” E0.m0c2 (1) • Note: mc2 = m(v≠0) .e. but not in conflict with Newtonian physics • Can add rest energy on both sides of any Newtonian energy balance without destroying it • Interpret K + E0 as “Total Energy” E.m0c2 = (m .

174268x1 0 = = + = + = – Find γ: γ = 2 2 m 0c m 0c 0.28 x 109 kg/s .85 x 1026 W – M/s = (E/c2)/s = = [(3.00 x 108)2]/s= 4.85 x 1026)/(3.511MeV 1 1 – Find v: v = c 1 − 2 = c 1 − = 0.Examples • Find the velocity of a 6 GeV electron – K = 6 GeV 6x103 MeV E K + m 0c 2 K 4 1 1 1.85 x 1026 W – P = E/s = 3.999999996c 4 2 γ (1.174268x10 ) E0 • Find the rate at which the sun loses mass if it radiates energy at the rate of 3.

therefore: • The Total Energy E is the conserved energy quantity now. (binomial expansion) – Note: K can not be obtained from K = 1/2 mv2 by using m = γm0 . K → 1/2 m0v2. – Law of Conservation of Energy applies to total energy E – In relativistic physics there are no separate laws of conservation of mass and energy • If there is Potential Energy involved. then E = K + V + E0 • K is equal to the increase in the mass of the object when it moves with speed v • As v → 0. as it should.Conservation of Energy • The rest energy m0c2 is of more than casual interest – Processes exist where the total rest mass is not conserved – Experiment shows that a change ∆E0 is compensated by a change ∆K so that the total energy change ∆E = 0.

Energy ... must have m0 = 0 (and E = pc) otherwise m = γm0 → ∞ (0/0 is OK!) .v2/c2)-1/2 to derive: E2 = p2c2 + (m0c2)2 (very important/useful) • E2 . use: γm0c2 and p = γm0v with γ =(1 . therefore E ≈ pc and K ≈ E • If m0 = 0.p2c2 = (m0c2)2 is “invariant” (same value in all frames) E= • Interesting limiting cases: 2 p2 1 p2 p2 2 2 – If v << c: 1+ E = m 0c 1 + 2 2 =m 0c 2 2 + . E = pc.Momentum Relationship • In Newtonian physics: K = p2/2m relates K to p • To find corresponding expression in relativistic physics. E = K and must have v = c otherwise E = mc2 = γm0c2 = 0 • If v = c (and E ≠ 0). = m 0 c + 2m 0 2 m0 c m0 c 2 • Get K = p /2m – If v ≈ c: E >> E0.

Energy.6 x 10-13 J • Since mc2 or m0c2 represent energy.Units: Mass. their units are MeV – Therefore. mass m can be given in units of MeV/c2 – Example: Rest mass of a proton is mp0 = 938MeV/c2. Momentum E2 = p2c2 + (m0c2)2 • In nuclear/particle physics preferred unit of energy is MeV 1 MeV = 1. This means: rest energy of a proton is mp0c2 = 938 MeV • Similarly: pc has units of MeV – Therefore. p can be given in units of MeV/c – Example: A proton with (total) E = 2 GeV has momentum p: E2 − (m0c2 ) = p= c2 2 (2000MeV) c2 2 938MeV − = 2 c 2 MeV (2000 − 938 ) = 1766 MeV/c c 2 2 2 .

p. m will all have units of energy – Here E2= p2 + m02 and E = K + m – Therefore: p= (K + m ) −m 2 2 0 0 = (500MeV + 938MeV) 2 − 9382 MeV 2 = 1090 MeV • in the “regular” system of units. using system of units where c = 1 1 (500 MeV + 938 MeV)2 − (938 MeV)2 = 1090 MeV/c c – Convenient since. would write p = 1090 MeV/c .Example • Compute the momentum of a 500 MeV proton – From E2 = p2c2 + (m0c2)2 = p2c2 + E02 – And from E = K + m0c2 – Compute: p= = 1 1 2 E2 − E0 = (K + m 0c 2 ) 2 − (m0c 2 ) = c c • Redo. now. E.

p2’sinθ2’ (3) E 1 = K 1 + m1 and E12 = p12 +m12 Recall: E1’ = K1’ + m1 E2’ = K2’ + m2 and and E1’2 = p1’2 +m12 E2’2 = p2’2 +m22 • Solve (1). K2’. m2. K2’. θ1’ Find: K1’.Relativistic Two-Body Kinematics Elastic Scattering K ’ m1 1 P1’ Given: m1. K1. (2). θ2’ . (3) for K1’. θ2’ • • m1 K1 p1 m2 θ1’ θ2’ m2 K2’ P2’ • Conservation of Energy (using c =1): E1 + m2 = E1’ + E2’ (1) Conservation of Momentum: p1 = p1’cosθ1’ + p2’cosθ2’ (2) 0 = p1’sinθ1’ .

Relativistic Two-Body Kinematics Elastic Scattering – Results (1) ' E1 E '2 cotθ '2 = + m ) ± p cosθ A − 4m [(E + m ) − p cos θ ] = 2[(E + m ) − p cos θ ] A (E + m ) ± p cosθ A − 4m [(E + m ) − p cos θ ] = 2[(E + m ) − p cos θ ] − (1 + ρ ρ )cotθ ± (ρ + ρ ) γ (1 − ρ ) + cot θ A (E 1 1 2 1 ' 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 ' 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 ' 1 2 1 2 1 ' 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 ' 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 ' 2 1 2 ' 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 ' 1 1 − ρ12 ρ1. γ are given by: Where A1. . ρ2. A2.

Relativistic Two-Body Kinematics Elastic Scattering – Results (2) A1 = 2(m12 + m1m 2 + m 2 K1 ) ρ1 = ρ2 = γ= A1p1 A 2 = 2(m 2 + m1m 2 + m 2 K1 ) 2 (E 2 2 2 ) ( ) m A 4m E m p + − + − 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 [ ] ] (E (E1 + m 2 ) − p12 m2 ) A2 4m 2 1 + 2 − 2 2 A 2 p1 [ 1 2 v cm 1− 2 c E1 + m 2 = m12 + m 2 (2E1 + m 2 ) .

Observations • Note: Not any θ1. θ2 are possible in two-body kinematics – Square root in E1. E2 must be > 0 A12 − 4m12 (m1 + m 2 ) + 2m 2 K1 2 ' sin θ1 ≤ 4m12 p12 2 [ ] ] (m1 + m 2 ) + 2m 2 K1 − 4m 2 A2 2 ' 2 2 sin θ 2 ≤ 2 4m 2 p 2 1 2 [ • Note: If m1 = m2 then θ1’ + θ2’ < π/2 (unlike classical mechanics) .Relativistic Two-Body Kinematics Elastic Scattering .

- BW-VRT1Uploaded byIanBlack
- Asprem (2011) Pondering ImponderablesUploaded byTóth András
- 6 - 29 - Combining Velocities (25-16, Low-Def)Uploaded byDey Sanz
- Particles and Waves_ Historical Essays in the Philosophy of ScienceUploaded byLuis Graillet
- ManifestationUploaded bymsngr00
- Kohl RauschUploaded byFarhan Aamir Baig
- Maxwell's Ether and Motion,Michelson, Lorentz, EinsteinUploaded byGeorge Mpantes mathematics teacher
- a_16_Unsubstantiated_Relativity_Models_Dr_Burniston_Brown.pdfUploaded bypvalant
- TURN 3Uploaded bymatald
- January 2013 QP - Unit 6 Edexcel PhysicsUploaded byZakryiaAtiq
- 2013 Theory of Antirelativity Eric DollardUploaded byJR2017
- Theory-of-Anti-Relativity”-by-E-P-DollardUploaded byKWojtek
- A Simple Test of Special Relativity and A Brief Discussion of Einstein's God Letter within the context of Krishna StoriesUploaded byvlaxmanan
- As you like itUploaded bygarcol
- 11310772Uploaded byMizanur Rahman
- Fate of Relativity When Something Which Travel Faster Than Light Is DiscoveredUploaded byIOSRjournal
- NSEP-2017 Solved AnswersUploaded bySanjeev Goel
- physics-c-equation-tables.pdfUploaded byspoonroo
- HW_Ch05Uploaded byJulian David Henao Escobar
- IITPaper_1_2009Uploaded byDivyanshu Verma
- A Meeting With Dr Einstein - Relativity and de Broglies wavelengthUploaded byAryan
- Newton's Laws of MotionUploaded byChinmay Sharma
- New Energy Technologies 2003Uploaded byioana968
- HA-5,relativityUploaded byMohd Zubair Khan
- Important Concepts 11Uploaded bySveti Jeronim
- Bio CentrismUploaded byMudassar Sabir
- Physics 2016 Curriculum Data BookletUploaded byrayban262
- ElectrollhuyUploaded byAbhinav Mishra
- Problemas propuestos de conversión de unidadesUploaded byJulio César Macías Zamora
- Coordinate SystemUploaded byVasantha Kumar

- Fluid Mechanics Ch-1Uploaded byswabright
- Appendix i BatransmittallttrUploaded byswabright
- chapter2_impactsmitigationUploaded byswabright
- typesoffoundation-090504011758-phpapp02Uploaded byswabright
- Appendix a CeqachecklistUploaded byswabright
- Civil3d TutorialsUploaded byswabright
- WP63-SSA-Irrigation-Water_215.pdfUploaded byswabright
- chapter5_distributionlistUploaded byswabright
- chapter1_projectdescriptionUploaded byswabright
- chapter3_4Uploaded byswabright
- Pull OutStrengthUploaded byswabright
- bolt1Uploaded byswabright
- seUploaded byswabright
- 148655757 Rural Water Paper II Civil EnggUploaded byswabright
- Tunnel LiningUploaded byswabright
- notesUploaded byswabright
- Three GorgesUploaded byswabright
- Basic Maths FormulaeUploaded byswabright
- UNIT v Hydro Electric PlantUploaded byswabright
- Aligning of Vertical ShaftsUploaded byswabright
- 12926Uploaded byswabright
- Engineering Design Basis GAUploaded byswabright
- 13321_1Uploaded byswabright
- 13326_1Uploaded byswabright
- Bsp Vl4-Buried PenstocksUploaded byswabright
- 7356_2Uploaded byswabright
- Thumb RulesUploaded byswabright
- 11130Uploaded byswabright
- hydropowerUploaded byswabright