29 views

Uploaded by Justin Wong

many coupled oscillators

- Trench Lagrange Multipliers
- Sydsaether Students Manual Further Smfmea2
- Differential Equations and Linear Algebra 4th Edition - Stephen W. Goode
- Response Method Theory
- hw1
- Supplier Selection Criteria Using the Analytical Network Process Method
- Mathematics (Introduction to Linear Algebra)
- SOLUTION OF EQUATION AX + XB = C BY INVERSION OF AN M ×M OR N × N MATRIX
- Linear Algebra Solutions
- Midterm 2 Sol
- MDOF_review_061904.pdf
- Notes 2
- JMathPhys_34_2968 Hojman
- 4.6 Steady State Probabilities
- TEST ON ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS.docx
- MP1718
- Dissonant Counterpoint Tenney
- Lecture 1 Matrix Algebra(1)
- Phase Portraits
- UOL Statistic 2 Exam Commentary Zone A

You are on page 1of 21

November 8, 2013

1 Two and Three Coupled Oscillators

1.1 Formal Preliminaries

Consider two particles that are constrained to move in one dimension (for example on an air track).

Their positions are speciﬁed by their respective distances x

1

and x

2

from their equilibrium positions.

These two positions can be represented as a two-component vector

x =

_

x

1

x

2

_

(1)

that can be represented as a point in a two-dimensional plane as shown in Fig. (2). An alternative

but equivalent representation of x(t) relies on the introduction of vectors e

1

and e

2

aligned along

the x

1

and x

2

directions:

e

1

=

_

1

0

_

≡

_

e

1,1

e

1,2

_

; e

2

=

_

0

1

_

≡

_

e

2,1

e

2,2

_

, (2)

where e

1,1

= 1, e

1,2

= 0, e

2,1

= 0 and e

2,2

= 1 or, equivalently, e

i,j

= δ

ij

, where δ

ij

is the Kroncker

delta that is equal to 1 if i = j and zero otherwise. These vectors form an orthonormal pair , i.e.,

they are of unit length and they are perpendicular to each other. They satisfy

e

i

· e

j

≡

k

e

i,k

e

j,k

= δ

ij

i, j = 1, 2 (3)

and

i

e

i,j

, e

i,k

= δ

jk

. (4)

By construction any vector x can be uniquely expressed as

x = x

1

e

1

+ x

2

e

2

≡ x

i

e

i

, (5)

where the summation convention over i is understood. Any set of vectors (e

1

, e

2

) that provide a

unique representation

x = x

1

e

1

+ x

2

e

2

≡ x

i

e

i

, (6)

of any vector x is is called a basis. If in addition the vectors satisfy the orthogonality relation

e

i

· e

j

= δ

ij

the basis is orthonormal. The vectors (e

1

, e

2

) form a special basis called the standard

basis. The jth component x

j

, j = 1, 2 of x with respect to the (e

1

, e

2

) basis is simply

x

j

= e

j

· x = e

j

· (x

i

e

i

) = x

i

δ

ij

= e

j,i

x

i

. (7)

1

m m

k

a

k

b

k

c

Figure 1: Two-mass oscillator

In addition to satisfying the orthogonality relation of Eq. (3), the vectors of an orthonormal basis

satisfy the completeness relation,

i

e

i,k

, e

i,j

= δ

kj

. (8)

Note that the sum is over the ﬁrst index, indicating the particular vector, rather than over the second

index, indicating the component of the vector, as in the orthogonality relation. The completeness

relation follows from the fact that (e

1

, e

2

) form a basis and any vector can be uniquely represented

in the from of Eq. (6). The j-component of x in the prime basis is

x

j

= x

i

e

j,i

= (x · e

i

)e

ij

= x

k

e

i,k

e

i,j

. (9)

The two sides can be equal only if the completeness relation, Eq. (8) is satisﬁed. (Remember that

the summation convention is used on repeated indices.)

If the particles are coupled with three springs with respective spring constants k

a

, k

b

, k

c

as

shown in Fig. 1, their equations of motion are

m¨ x

1

(t) = −k

a

x

1

−k

b

(x

1

−x

2

)

m¨ x

2

(t) = −k

b

(x

2

−x

1

) −k

c

x

2

. (10)

This equation can be written in a compact form with the introduction of the stiﬀness matrix,

kkk =

_

k

a

+ k

b

−k

b

−k

b

k

b

+ k

c

_

≡

_

k

12

k

12

k

12

k

22

_

(11)

where k

ij

, i, j = 1, 2 are the components of the symmetric stiﬀness matrix with k

ij

= k

ji

. Then

¨ x(t) = −

1

m

kkk x(t) ≡ −DDDx(t), (12)

where

DDD =

_

(k

a

+ k

b

)/m −k

b

/m

−k

b

/m (k

b

+ k

c

)/m

_

≡

_

ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

−ω

2

b

−ω

2

b

ω

2

b

+ ω

2

c

_

(13)

is the dynamical matrix.

We expect that the masses will undergo simple harmonic oscillations with two distinct frequen-

cies, so we assume that x(t) has the form

x(t) = e

−iωt

a = e

−iωt

_

a

1

a

2

_

, (14)

where a

1

and a

2

are complex amplitudes with independent magnitudes and phases for a total of

four independent variables. The physical solutions are obtained by taking the real part of or x(t).

The second derivative with respect to time brings down a factor of −ω

2

so that Eq. (13) becomes

ω

2

a = DDDa or (DDD −ω

2

III) a = 0, (15)

2

a homogeneous equation that can only be satisﬁed when ω

2

is an eigenvalue and a is an associated

eigenvector of the the dynamical matrix DDD. III is the identity matrix with components I

ij

= δ

ij

. It

has the property that IIIa = a for any vector a.

A fundamental theorem of algebra is that a system of homogenous linear equations has a solution

if an only if the determinant of the matrix of its coeﬃcients is zero. To see how this result comes

about in the simplest form, consider an arbitrary 2 ×2 matrix

CCC =

_

C

11

C

12

C

21

C

22

_

. (16)

The homogenous equation CCCa = 0 in component form is

C

11

a

1

+ C

12

a

2

= 0 (17)

C

21

a

1

+ C

22

a

2

= 0. (18)

If C

22

> 0, then from Eq. (18),

a

2

= −

C

21

C

22

a

1

, (19)

which when used in Eq. (17) yields

C

11

a

1

+ C

12

a

2

=

_

C

11

−

C

12

C

21

C

22

_

a

1

=

1

C

22

(C

11

C

22

−C

12

C

21

)a

1

=

a

1

C

22

det CCC = 0, (20)

where

det CCC = C

11

C

22

−C

12

C

21

(21)

is the determinant of CCC. Thus either a

1

= 0 or det CCC = 0. If a

1

= 0, then a

2

= 0 provided C

21

= 0.

This is an uninteresting case in which a

1

= a

2

= 0. If C

21

= 0, then C

22

a

2

= 0 and either C

22

= 0

or a

2

= 0. The latter case is the uninteresting one with a

1

= a

2

= 0 again. If C

22

= 0 and C

21

= 0

and det CCC = 0. A similar line of argument can be used if C

11

= 0. The end result is that in all

cases, either a

1

= a

2

= 0 or det CCC = 0. Clearly the latter case is the only interesting one.

Thus to ﬁnd the eigenvalues of the dynamical matrix, we need to solve the equation

det(DDD −ω

2

III) = 0. (22)

This determinant is a second-order polynomial, P(ω

2

), in ω

2

, called the characteristic polynomial

of DDD, whose roots, which are the eigenvalues, can be calculated for general DDD from the quadratic

formula.

1.2 A Simple Two-particle Example

To keep our discussion simple for the moment, we will ﬁrst consider simple special cases. In

particular, we consider the case in which ω

2

c

= ω

2

b

. The characteristic equation in this case is

P(ω

2

) = det

_

ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

−ω

2

−ω

2

b

−ω

2

b

ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

−ω

2

_

= (ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

−ω

2

)

2

−ω

4

b

(23)

Its roots are

(ω

2

−ω

2

a

−ω

2

b

) = ±ω

2

b

, (24)

3

e

1

e

2

2

e

1

e

e

1

e

2

x

2

e

1

e

x

1

x

2

1

x

2

x

θ

1,1

e

2,1

e

1,2

e

2,2

e

(a) (b)

Figure 2: (a) The standard basis vectors e

1

and e

2

and the eigenvectors ˜ e

1

and ˜ e

2

for the case

in which the rotation angle is 45

◦

. The components ˜ e

µ,1

and ˜ e

µ,2

of ˜ e

µ

, µ = 1, 2 are simply the

projects of these vectors onto the e

1

and e

2

axes. (b) The standard and rotated basis vectors for

an arbitrary rotation angle showing how the components of an arbitrary vector can be represented

with respect to either basis.

or

ω

2

1

= ω

2

a

ω

2

2

= ω

2

a

+ 2ω

2

b

. (25)

These are the same frequencies we obtained by guessing the form of the displacements with a ﬁxed

frequency from the air track demonstration in class.

Associated with these eigenfrequencies are eigenvectors a

1

= (a

1,1

, a

1,2

) and a

2

= (a

2,1

, a

2,2

),

which are obtained by requiring DDDa

1

−ω

2

1

a

1

= 0 and DDDa

2

−ω

2

2

a

2

= 0. We start with the equation

for a

1

:

(ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

−ω

2

1

)a

1,1

−ω

2

b

a

1,2

= ω

2

b

a

1,1

−ω

2

b

a

1,2

= 0

−ω

2

b

a

1,1

+ (ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

−ω

2

1

)a

1,2

= −ω

2

b

a

1,1

+ ω

2

a

a

1,2

= 0. (26)

Both of these equations yield a

1,2

= a

2,1

. Of course if they did not yield the same result, we would

be in trouble, but we are guaranteed that they do because det DDD−ω

2

1

III = 0 guarantees that the two

equations are linearly proportional to each other. Similarly, keeping only one equation,

(ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

−ω

2

2

)a

2,1

−ω

2

b

a

2,2

= −ω

2

b

a

2,1

−ω

2

b

a

22

= 0 (27)

and a

2,1

= −a

2,2

. If a

µ

(µ = 1, 2) is an eigenvector, then any constant times a

µ

is an eigenvector.

We will denote the normalized version of a

µ

as ˜ e

µ

, where

˜ e

1

=

1

√

2

_

1

1

_

=

_

cos θ

sin θ

_

, ˜ e

2

=

1

√

2

_

−1

1

_

=

_

−sin θ

cos θ

_

, (28)

where for this case θ = 45

◦

. For more general values of the elastic constants, θ can take on any value

as depicted in Fig. 2. These two vectors are orthogonal, i.e, ˜ e

1

· ˜ e

2

= 0, and they were constructed

to have unit length. Thus the form an orthonormal pair with

˜ e

µ

· ˜ e

ν

= δ

µ,ν

, µ, ν = 1, 2 (29)

where are before, δ

µ,ν

is the Kronecker delta that is equal to one if µ = ν and zero otherwise.

The components ˜ e

µ,i

of ˜ e

µ

are the coeﬃcients of e

i

in the representation of ˜ e

µ

in the standard

basis:

˜ e

µ

= ˜ e

µ,i

e

i

= U

µ,i

e

i

, (30)

4

where as usual the summation convention on repeated indices is understood, U

µ,i

= ˜ e

µ,i

are the

components of the matrix

UUU =

_

˜ e

1,1

˜ e

1,2

˜ e

2,1

˜ e

2,1

_

=

1

√

2

_

1 1

−1 1

_

=

_

cos θ sin θ

−sin θ cos θ

_

. (31)

The set (˜ e

1

, ˜ e

2

) is merely a rotated version of the basis (e

1

, e

2

) as shown in Fig. 2. In this case, the

rotation angle is 45

◦

, but in more general problems, it can be any angle, as we shall see shortly.

The matrix U is a rotation matrix.

The inverse AAA

−1

of any matrix AAA is deﬁned by

AAA

−1

AAA = AAAAAA

−1

= III (32)

Rotation matrices like UUU with components U

µ,i

have the property that their inverse is simply their

transpose UUU

T

whose components are U

T

i,µ

= U

µ,i

. Thus

UUU

T

=

1

√

2

_

1 −1

1 1

_

=

_

cos θ −sin θ

sin θ cos θ

_

. (33)

and

UUU

T

UUU =

1

2

_

1 −1

1 1

__

1 1

−1 1

_

=

_

1 0

0 1

_

= III. (34)

ThusUUU

T

is the inverse of UUU.

It is clear from the geometry in Fig. 2 that any vector x can be represented in terms of its

components (x

1

, x

2

) with respect to the the standard basis or in terms of its components (˜ x

1

, ˜ x

2

)

relative the ˜ e

1

and ˜ e

2

. In other words, the set (˜ e

1

, ˜ e

2

) form a basis, and

x = x

1

e

1

+ x

2

e

2

≡ x

i

e

i

= ˜ x

1

˜ e

1

+ ˜ x

2

˜ e

2

≡ ˜ x

µ

˜ e

µ

. (35)

Taking the dot produce of both sides of this equation with ˜ e

µ

yields

˜ x

µ

= x · ˜ e

µ

= x

i

e

i

· ˜ e

µ

= x

i

˜ e

µ,i

= U

µ,i

x

i

. (36)

Deﬁning ˜ x to be the column vector with components ˜ x

µ

, this equation can be rewritten as

˜ x = UUUx. (37)

Now what can we do with all of this? First, let’s return to the original dynamical equation,

Eq. (12), and express x(t) in the “tilde” basis (˜ e

1

, ˜ e

2

):

¨ x =

¨

˜ x

µ

˜ e

µ

= −DDD˜ x

µ

˜ e

µ

= −

µ

ω

2

µ

˜ x

µ

˜ e

µ

(38)

where the last step follows because ˜ e

µ

is the eigenvector of DDD with eigenvalue ω

2

µ

. Taking the dot

produce of both sides of the equation with ˜ e

µ

, ν = 1, 2 leads to

¨

˜ x

ν

= −ω

2

µ

˜ x

ν

, µ = 1, 2. (39)

In other words ˜ x

1

and ˜ x

2

obey the equations of a simple harmonic oscillators with respective

frequencies ω

1

and ω

2

. We have reduced the coupled oscillator equations to uncoupled single

oscillator equations. ˜ x

1

and ˜ x

2

are the normal modes of the system, often denoted as q

1

(t) and

5

q

2

(t). The solutions to the uncoupled equations are the familiar solutions to the simple oscillator,

i.e,.

˜ x

µ

(t) ≡ q

µ

(t) =

˜

A

µ

e

−iωµt

or (40)

q

µ

(t) = B

µ

cos ω

µ

t + C

µ

sin ω

µ

t

ω

µ

(41)

= A

µ

cos(ω

µ

t −δ

µ

) (42)

We now have the general solution for the coupled oscillator problem:

x(t) =

µ

q

µ

(t)˜ e

µ

=

µ

_

B

µ

cos ω

µ

t + C

µ

sin ω

µ

t

ω

µ

_

˜ e

µ

(43)

˙ x(t) =

µ

(−ω

µ

B

µ

sin ω

µ

t + C

µ

cos ω

µ

t) ˜ e

µ

. (44)

The unknown coeﬃcients

˜

A

µ

(or B

µ

and C

µ

) are determined by boundary conditions that are

usually speciﬁed at t = 0. Setting x(0) = x

0

= (x

0,1

, x

0,2

) and

˙

x(0) = v

0

= (v

0,1

, v

0,2

), the

boundary conditions can be expressed as

x

0

= B

1

˜ e

1

+ B

2

˜ e

2

; v

0

= C

1

˜ e

1

+ C

2

˜ e

2

. (45)

The orthonormal property of ˜ e

µ

allows us to calculatesd the unknown coeﬃcients by simply taking

the dot product of these two equation with ˜ e

1

and ˜ e

1

:

B

1

= x

0

· ˜ e

1

=

1

√

2

(x

0,1

+ x

0,2

) (46)

B

2

= x

0

· ˜ e

2

=

1

√

2

(−x

0,1

+ x

0,2

) (47)

C

1

= v

0

· ˜ e

1

=

1

√

2

(v

0,1

+ v

0,2

) (48)

C

2

= v

0

· ˜ e

2

=

1

√

2

(−v

0,1

+ v

0,2

). (49)

Putting these terms back into Eq. (43), we obtain

x

1

(t) = q

1

(t)˜ e

1,1

+ q

2

(t)˜ e

2,1

=

1

2

(x

0,1

+ x

0,2

) cos ω

1

t +

1

2

(x

0,1

−x

0,2

) cos ω

2

t +

1

2

(v

0,1

+ v

0,2

)

sin ω

1

t

ω

1

+

1

2

(v

0,1

−v

0,2

)

sin ω

2

t

ω

1

(50)

x

2

(t) = q

2

(t)˜ e

1,2

+ q

2

(t)˜ e

2,2

=

1

2

(x

0,1

+ x

0,2

) cos ω

1

t −

1

2

(x

0,1

−x

0,2

) cos ω

2

t +

1

2

(v

0,1

+ v

0,2

)

sin ω

1

t

ω

1

+−

1

2

(v

0,1

−v

0,2

)

sin ω

2

t

ω

1

(51)

This equation can easily be applied to special cases. For, example if x

0,1

= x

0

and x

0,2

= 0,

v

0,1

= v

0,2

= 0, the solutions are

x

1

(t) =

1

2

x

0

(cos ω

1

t + cos ω

2

t)

x

2

(t) =

1

2

x

0

(cos ω

1

t −cos ω

2

t) (52)

6

1.3 A More Complex Two-Particle example

In the example we just studied, the normal modes were simple. In one mode the two masses moved

in the same direction the same amount, and in the second, they moved in opposite directions

the same amount. We now consider a somewhat more complicated realization of the two-mass,

two-spring problem in which k

b

= 2k

a

and k

c

= 4k

a

. From Eq. (13),

DDD = ω

2

a

_

3 −2

−2 6

_

, (53)

where ω

2

a

= k

a

/m. Clearly the eigenvalues of DDD will be proportional to ω

2

a

, so we set ω

2

= ω

2

a

s.

The characteristic polynomial is then

P(ω

2

) = ω

4

0

[(3 −s)(6 −s) −4] = ω

2

0

(s

2

−9s + 14), (54)

and its roots are s

1

= 2 and s

2

= 7 or ω

2

1

= 2ω

2

a

and ω

2

2

= 7ω

2

a

. The eigenvectors a

1

= (a

1,1

, a

1,2

)

and a

2

= (a

2,1

, a

2,2

) are determined by

(3ω

2

a

−2ω

2

a

)a

1,1

−2ω

2

a

a

1,2

= = ω

2

a

[a

1,1

−2a

1,2

] = 0 (55)

(3ω

2

a

−7ω

2

a

)a

2,1

−2ω

2

a

a

2,2

= ω

2

a

[−4a

2,1

−2a

2,2

] = 0. (56)

Thus the normalized eigenvectors are

˜ e

1

=

1

√

5

_

2

1

_

=

_

cos θ

sin θ

_

, ˜ e

2

=

1

√

5

_

−1

2

_

=

_

−sin θ

cos θ

_

, (57)

where θ = tan

−1

(1/2) = 26.6

◦

. These vectors clearly satisfy the orthonormality and completeness

relations ˜ e

µ

· ˜ e

ν

= δ

µ,ν

and

µ

˜ e

µ,i

˜ e

µ,j

= δ

ij

.

Set boundary conditions x

0

= x

0

(1, 1) and ˙ x(0) = v

0

= v

0

(1, −1), then

B

1

= x

0

· ˜ e

1

= x

0

_

2

√

5

+

1

√

5

_

=

3

√

5

x

0

B

2

= x

0

· ˜ e

2

= x

0

_

−

1

√

5

+

2

√

5

_

=

1

√

5

x

0

C

1

= v

0

· ˜ e

1

= v

0

_

2

√

5

−

1

√

5

_

=

1

√

5

v

0

C

2

= v

0

· ˜ e

2

= v

0

_

−

1

√

5

−

2

√

5

_

= −

3

√

5

v

0

(58)

and

x

1

(t) =

1

5

x

0

(6 cos ω

1

t −cos ω

2

t) +

1

5

v

0

_

2

sin ω

1

t

ω

1

+ 3

sin ω

2

t

ω

2

_

x

2

(t) =

1

5

x

0

(3 cos ω

1

t + 2 cos ω

2

t) +

1

5

v

0

_

sin ω

1

t

ω

1

−6

sin ω

2

t

ω

2

_

. (59)

7

m m m

k

a

k

b

k

c

k

d

Figure 3: Three-mass oscillator

1.4 A Three Oscillator Problem

In the previous sections, we set up a formalism for solving the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the

dynamical matrix. We focussed on simple two-oscillator examples, but the formalism is valid for

oscillator systems with an arbitrary number of degrees of freedom. Basically, each particle has

one translational degree of freedom per spatial dimension. Thus, if there are N particles in d

dimensions, there will be dN degrees of freedom, and the dynamical matrix will a dN dimensional

square matrix (i.e., a dN × dN matrix). Here we will study a simple three-oscillator system in

one-dimension with three degrees of freedom. The system consists of three masses and four springs

as shown in Fig. 3.

The springs from left to right have k

a

= 4k, k

b

= 3k, k

c

= 4k, and k

d

= 3k. The equations of

motion are

¨ x

1

(t) = −4ω

2

0

x

1

−3ω

2

0

(x

1

−x

2

)

¨ x

2

(t) = −3ω

2

0

(x

2

−x

1

) −4ω

2

0

(x

2

−x

3

)

¨ x

3

(t) = −4ω

2

0

(x

3

−x

2

) −3ω

2

0

x

3

, (60)

where ω

2

0

= k/m. The dynamical matrix is then

DDD = ω

2

0

_

_

7 −3 0

−3 7 −4

0 −4 7

_

_

, (61)

and setting ω

2

= s, the characteristic polynomial, det(DDD −ω

2

0

s) is

p(s) ≡

P(sω

2

0

)

ω

6

0

= (7 −s)[(7 −s)

2

−16] −9(7 −s) = (7 −s)[(7 −s)

2

−25] = 0 (62)

The eigenvalues (in units of ω

2

0

) are s = 7, s = 7 ±

√

25 or

s

1

= 2, s

2

= 7, s

3

= 12. (63)

The associated eigenvectors a

µ

= (a

µ,1

, a

µ,2

, a

µ,3

), µ = 1, 2, 3, are determined by solving (DDD −

s

µ

ω

2

0

)aaa

µ

= 0. We solve these equations in order:

s = 2 ,

1

ω

2

0

(DDD−2ω

2

0

)a

1

=

_

_

5 −3 0

−3 5 −4

0 −4 5

_

_

_

_

a

1,1

a

1,2

a

1,3

_

_

=

_

_

5a

1,1

−3a

1,2

−3a

1,1

+ 5a

1,2

−4a

1,3

−4a

1,2

+ 5a

1,3

_

_

=

_

_

0

0

0

_

_

(64)

The ﬁrst and third columns yield a

1,1

= (3/5)a

1,2

and a

1,3

= (4/5)a

1,2

. The equation from the

second column is automatically satisﬁed by these relations. The ﬁrst normalized eigenvector is,

therefore,

˜ e

1

=

1

5

√

2

_

_

3

5

4

_

_

(65)

8

The second eigenvector is next:

s = 7 ,

1

ω

2

0

(DDD −7ω

2

0

)a

1

=

_

_

0 −3 0

−3 0 −4

0 −4 0

_

_

_

_

a

2,1

a

2,2

a

2,3

_

_

=

_

_

−3a

2,2

−3a

2,1

−4a

2,3

−4a

2,2

_

_

=

_

_

0

0

0

_

_

. (66)

Thus a

2,2

= 0, and a

2,3

= −(3/4)a

2,1

, and the normalized second eigenvector is

˜ e

2

=

1

5

_

_

4

0

−3

_

_

. (67)

Finally, the third eigenvector

s = 12 :

1

ω

2

0

(DDD −12ω

2

0

)a

1

=

_

_

−5 −3 0

−3 −5 −4

0 −4 5

_

_

_

_

a

3,1

a

3,2

a

3,3

_

_

=

_

_

−5a

3,1

−3a

3,2

−3a

3,1

−5a

3,2

−4a

1,3

−4a

3,2

−5a

3,3

_

_

=

_

_

0

0

0

_

_

.

(68)

Thus, a

3,1

= −(3/5)a

3,2

, a

3,3

= −(4/5)a

3,2

, and the normalized third eigenvector is

˜ e

3

=

1

5

√

2

_

_

−3

5

−4

_

_

(69)

It is a straightforward exercise to verify the orthogonality and completeness relations: ˜ e

µ

· ˜ e

ν

= δ

µ,ν

and

3

µ=1

˜ e

µ,i

˜ e

µ,j

= δ

ij

.

The general solution for this set of oscillators is thus

x(t) =

3

µ=1

_

B

µ

cos ω

µ

t + C

µ

sin ω

µ

t

ω

µ

_

˜ e

µ

(70)

If the initial conditions x

0

and v

0

are given for the displacement and velocities, then

B

µ

= x

0

· ˜ e

µ

, C

µ

= v

0

· ˜ e

µ

. (71)

If x

0

= (x

0

, 0, 0) and v

0

= (0, 0, 0),

B

1

=

3

5

√

2

x

0

, B

2

=

4

5

x

0

, B

3

= −

3

5

√

2

, (72)

C

1

= C

2

= C

3

= 0, and

_

_

x

1

(t)

x

2

(t)

x

3

(t)

_

_

= x

0

_

_

1

50

(9 cos ω

1

t + 32 cos ω

2

t + 9 cos ω

3

t)

3

10

(cos ω

1

t −cos ω

3

t)

6

25

(cos ω

1

t −2 cos ω

2

t + cos ω

3

t)

_

_

(73)

1.5 Diﬀerent Masses

So far, we have only considered systems in which the masses are equal. When they are no equal,

the most direct approach leads to dynamical matrices that are not symmetric. This matrix, as

we shall see, still has real eigenvalues as it must, but its right an left eigenvectors are diﬀerent.

This is something of a nuisance, and it is advantageous in general to formulate the problem so that

9

the dynamical matrix is symmetric. We ﬁrst look at the the problem of two coupled oscillators

with diﬀerent masses using the direct approach, and then we look at it using the approach with

a symmetric dynamical matrix. Consider the system depicted in Fig. (1) but with the right mass

having mass m

1

, the left mass having mass m

2

, and k

c

= k

a

. The equations of motion are

m

1

¨ x

1

= −k

a

x

1

−k

b

(x

1

−x

2

)

m

2

¨ x

2

= −k

b

(x

2

−x

1

) −k

a

x

2

. (74)

In compact form, this equation is

mmm¨ x = −kkkx (75)

¨ x = −mmm

−1

kkkx ≡ −DDD

x, (76)

where the stiﬀness matrix kkk is the same as Eq. (11) and the mass matrix is

mmm =

_

m

1

0

0 m

2

_

. (77)

so that

DDD

=

_

ka+k

b

m

1

−

k

b

m

1

−

k

b

m

2

ka+k

b

m

2

_

=

_

ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

−ω

2

b

−ηω

2

b

−η(ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

)

_

(78)

where ω

2

α

= k

α

/m

1

for α = a, b, c and η = m

1

/m

2

. The eigenvalues, which are the roots of the

characteristic polynomial,

P(ω

2

) = det

_

−ω

2

III +DDD

_

= det

_

ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

−ω

2

−ω

2

b

−ηω

2

b

η(ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

) −ω

2

_

(79)

= [ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

−ω

2

][η(ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

) −ω

2

] −ηω

4

b

, (80)

are

P(ω

2

) =

1

2

_

(1 + η)ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

±

_

[(1 −η)

2

(ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

)

2

−4ηω

4

b

_

. (81)

The matrix DDD

**is not symmetric. Though it is not necessary for the dynamical matrix to be
**

symmetric, there are advantages to setting up a formalism in which it is. These include dealing

with a matrix form that is guaranteed to have real eigenvalues and one whose “right” and ’‘left”

eigenvectors are transposes of each other. If an n×n square matrix AAA has eigenvalues λ

µ

, µ = 1, . . . n,

it has right eigenvectors r

µ

such that AAAr

n

= λ

n

r

n

and left eigenvectors l

µ

such that AAAl

µ

= λ

µ

l

µ

. For

symmetric matices, l

µ

= r

T

µ

. To convert the equation of motion, Eq. (75) to one with a symmetric

dynamical matrix, we introduce the square root, mmm

1/2

, and the inverse square root, mmm

−1/2

, of the

mass matrix:

mmm

1/2

=

_

m

1/2

1

0

0 m

1/2

2

_

mmm

−1/2

=

_

m

−1/2

1

0

0 m

−1/2

2

_

. (82)

It is straightforward to verify that mmm

1/2

mmm

1/2

= mmm and that mmm

−1/2

mmm

1/2

= III. We next introduce the

vector

y = mmm

1/2

x =

_

m

1/2

1

0

0 m

1/2

2

_

_

x

1

x

2

_

=

_

√

m

1

x

1

√

m

2

x

2

_

. (83)

This equation can be inverted to give x in terms of y:

x = mmm

−1/2

y =

_

y

1

/

√

m

1

y

2

/

√

m

2

_

. (84)

10

With these deﬁnitions, we can reexpress mmmx = mmm

1/2

y and kkkx = kkkmmm

−1/2

mmm

1/2

x = kkkmmm

−1/2

y. Thus

mmm¨ x = mmm

1/2

¨ y = −kkkx = −kkkmmm

−1/2

y or

¨ y = −DDDy, (85)

where

DDD = mmm

−1/2

kkkmmm

−1/2

=

_

k

11

m

1

k

12

√

m

1

m

2

k

12

√

m

1

m

2

k

22

m

2

_

=

_

ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

−

√

ηω

2

b

−

√

ηω

2

b

η(ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

)

_

(86)

is the now symmetrized dynamical matrix. The only price we had to pay for this transformation is

the introduction of the vector y. It is clear that characteristic polynomial associated with DDD is the

same as that associated with DDD

.

Our next step is to determine the eigenvectors of D. Though we can do this analytically for

general ω

2

s

, s = a, b, c and η, the expressions are messy, so we consider only a special case in which

ω

2

a

= 25ω

2

0

, ω

2

b

= 7ω

2

0

, and η = 1/4. Then

DDD = ω

2

0

_

32 −7/2

−7/2 8

_

andDDD −ω

2

III = ω

2

_

32 −s −7/2

−7/2 8 −s

_

(87)

where ω

2

= ω

2

0

s and the characteristic polynomial is

P(sω

2

0

) = ω

2

0

[(32 −s)(8 −s) −(49/4)] = ω

−

0

2

[s

4

−40s + 8 ×32 −(49/4)]. (88)

The roots of P give the eigenvalues:

ω

2

=

ω

2

0

2

_

40 ±

_

40

2

−32

2

+ 49

_

=

ω

2

0

2

[40 ±25] (89)

or

ω

2

1

=

15

2

ω

2

0

, ω

2

2

=

65

2

ω

2

0

. (90)

The eigenvectors are calculated as in previous examples. They are

˜ e

1

=

1

√

50

_

1

7

_

=

_

cos θ

sin θ

_

˜ e

2

=

1

√

50

_

−7

1

_

=

_

−sin θ

cos θ

_

(91)

where cos θ = 1/

√

50 and sin θ = 7/

√

50. The ﬁnal form in terms of cos θ and sin θ is valid for any

values of k

a

, k

b

, k

c

, m

1

and m

2

but with diﬀerent values of θ.

Solving initial value problem proceeds exactly as before, except we have to keep straight factors

of

√

m

1

and

√

m

2

. Consider ﬁrst the case in which x(0) = (x

0

, 0) and ˙ x(t = 0) = (0, 0). Then

y(0) = (

√

m

1

x

0

, 0) and ˙ y(t = 0) = (0, 0), and

y(t) = q

1

(t)˜ e

1

+ q

2

(t)˜ e

2

= B

1

cos ω

1

t˜ e

1

+ B

2

cos ω

2

t˜ e

2

(92)

so that

y(0) = B

1

˜ e

1

+ B

2

˜ e

1

(93)

This implies

B

1

= y(0) · ˜ e

1

=

√

m

1

x

0

˜ e

1,1

=

_

m

1

50

x

0

B

2

= y(0) · ˜ e

2

=

√

m

1

x

0

˜ e

2,1

= −7

_

m

1

50

x

0

11

To ﬁnd x(t), we simply multiply y(t) by mmm

−1/2

to obtain

x

1

(t) = m

−1/2

1

y

1

(t) = x

0

(˜ e

2

1,1

cos ω

1

t + ˜ e

2

2,1

cos ω

2

t) = x

0

(cos

2

θ cos ω

1

t + sin

2

θ cos ω

2

t)

=

x

0

50

(cos ω

1

t + 49 cos ω

2

t) (94)

x

2

(t) = m

−1/2

2

y

2

(t) =

_

m

2

m

1

x

0

(˜ e

1,1

˜ e

1,2

cos ω

1

t + ˜ e

2,1

˜ e

2,2

cos ω

2

t)

=

_

m

2

m

1

x

0

cos θ sin θ(cos ω

1

t −cos ω

2

t)

=

7x

0

50

(cos ω

1

t −cos ω

2

t). (95)

This result should be contrasted with that we obtained with equal masses. There cos θ = sin θ =

1/

√

2 so that

x

1

(t) =

1

2

x

0

(cos ω

1

+ cos ω

2

t) = x

0

cos ω

av

t cos ∆ωt (96)

x

2

(t) =

1

2

x

0

(cos ω

1

−cos ω

2

t) = x

0

sin ω

av

t sin ∆ωt, (97)

where ω

av

= (ω

1

+ ω

2

)/2 and ∆ω = (ω

2

− ω

1

)/2. These equations describe a beating pattern

in which the lower frequency parts sin δωt and cos ∆ωt provide an envelope for the more rapidly

varying parts oscillating with frequency ω

av

. When sin ∆ωt = 0 (i.e., t = nπ/∆ω for any integer n,

x

2

(t) = 0 and the envelope of x

1

(t) is a maximum. Similarly, when the cos ∆ωt = 1, the envelope

of x

1

(t) is zero that of x

2

(t) is a maximum. The result as we say in class is that in the beginning,

mass 2 appears to be at rest, then both masses move, then mass one appears to be at rest and so

on periodically as shown in Fig. 4 (a) and (c). In the unequal mass case, cos θ = sin θ, and the

beating is less obvious as can be seen by the following alternative (but equivalent) expressions for

x

1

(t) and x

2

(t):

x

1

(t) =

1

2

x

0

[cos ω

av

t cos ∆ωt + cos 2θ(sin ω

av

t sin ∆ωt)] (98)

x

2

(t) =

1

2

x

0

sin 2θ sin ω

av

t sin ∆ωt (99)

Clearly the envelope of x

1

(t) never goes to zero as shown in Fig. 4 (b) and (d).

2 N-coupled oscillators

2.1 Fixed Boundary Conditions

Consider N particles of mass m connected by springs and constrained to move in one-dimension as

shown for three particles in Fig. 3. For the moment, we consider only the case in which all springs

have the same spring constant k. There are two boundary conditions on these oscillators; the left

end of the ﬁrst spring is clamped at the left wall and the right end of the last spring is clamped at

the right wall. These boundary conditions are referred to as ﬁxed boundary conditions.It is useful

to imagine that the walls are clamped particles, which we label as particle 0 and particle N + 1,

respectively. The set-up is now that there are N +2 particles 0, 1, ...N, N +1, where the positions of

the ﬁrst and last particles are clamped at the walls. The equations of motion for particle 2, ..., N−1

all have the same form because they have identical environments, being connected via springs to a

12

5 10 15 20 25 30

-1.0

-0.5

0.5

1.0

(a)

5 10 15 20 25 30

-1.0

-0.5

0.5

1.0

(b)

5 10 15 20 25 30

-1.0

-0.5

0.5

1.0

(c)

5 10 15 20 25 30

-0.5

0.5

(d)

Figure 4: (a) x

1

(t) and (c) x

2

(t) for equal-mass coupled oscillators; (b) x

1

(t) and (d) x

2

(t) for

unequal mass coupled oscillators. Note in the equal-mass case, x

1

(t) oscillates near zero when x

2

(t)

oscillates near its max and vice versa. In the unequal mass case, the envelope of ov x

1

(t) never

goes to zero.

mobile particle on the right and one on the left. Particles 1 and N, on the other hand are connected

to an immobile wall on one side, and their equations of motion look diﬀerent:

¨ x

1

= −k(x

1

−x

0

) −k(x

1

−x

2

) = −2kx

1

+ kx

2

¨ x

2

= −k(x

2

−x

1

) −k(x

2

−x

3

) = −k(2x

2

−x

3

−x

1

)

... ...

... ...

... ...

¨ x

p

= −k(x

p

−x

p−1

) −k(x

p

−x

p+1

) = −k(2x

p

−x

p+1

−x

p−1

)

... ...

... ...

... ...

¨ x

N

= −k(x

N

−x

N+1

) −k(x

N

−x

N−1

) = −2kx

N

+ kx

N−1

(100)

The usual strategy for determining the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of this system of equations is

to “guess” (ansatz ) the form of the eigenvectors and use their free degrees of freedom to ensure

that the ﬁrst and last equations are satisﬁed. We, therefore, make the following ansatz:

x

q,p

(t) = A

q

e

−iωt

sin(qp + φ

q

) (101)

where q is an index (whose form is to be determined) specifying the particular eigenmode, p = 1, ...N

labels the position of particle p, and φ

q

is a phase which we will use to set boundary conditions. In

13

vector notation, this ansatz corresponds to an vector

x

q

(t) = A

q

e

−iωt

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

sin(q + φ

q

)

sin(2q + φ

q

)

.

.

.

sin(Nq + φ

q

)

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

. (102)

If this ansatz is right, then it must be that (2x

p

−x

p+1

−x

p−1

) be proportional to x

p

for every p.

Consider, therefore,

2 sin(qp + φ

q

) −sin(q(p + 1) + φ

q

) −sin(q(p −1) + φ

q

)

= 2 sin(qp + φ

q

) −(sin(qp + φ

q

) cos q + cos(qp + φ

q

) sin q + sin(qp + φ

q

) cos q −cos(qp + φ

q

) sin q)

= 2(1 −cos q) sin(pq + φ

q

). (103)

Thus, provided we satisfy the boundary equations [p = 1 and p = N], we have (using ¨ x

q,p

=

−ω

2

x

q,p

), each term in Eqs. (100) have the same form

ω

2

x

q,p

= 2(k/m)(1 −cos q)x

q,p

= 4(k/m) sin

2

(q/2) (104)

Note that this result is independent of φ

q

. This phase will be at our disposal to match diﬀerent

boundary conditions. To each index q, there corresponds the eigenvalue

ω

2

q

=

2k

m

(1 −cos q) =

4k

m

sin

2

(q/2). (105)

Its associated eigenvectors is

e

q

= C

q

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

sin(q + φ

q

)

sin(2q + φ

q

)

.

.

.

sin(Nq + φ

q

)

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

, (106)

where the coeﬃcient C

q

is chosen to normalize the eigenvector so that e

∗

q

· e

q

= 1. We will return

to this normalization and the demonstration that the eigenvectors are orthogonal shortly.

Now we have to deal with the boundary conditions. In the current problem, we require that

the left and right walls be stationary, i.e., that x

0

= 0 and x

N+1

= 0. To satisfy the ﬁrst condition,

we merely chose φ

q

= 0. The displacements are then proportional to sin qp, which clearly equals

zero when p = 0. To match the second boundary condition, we set

sin q(N + 1) = 0. (107)

This constraint quantizes the values of q:

q =

nπ

N + 1

; n = 1, 2, ..., N. (108)

Notes that n = 0 and n = N + 1 are not counted because sin qp = 0 for every p for these values.

There are nonetheless N independent modes as required.

14

Why don’t we have to consider q’s that are outside the range 0 to π? It is because q’s outside

this range describe exactly the same situations as those for q’s within this range. Consider ﬁrst the

frequency of Eq. (104), and let q = π ±∆q, then

sin

q

2

= sin

_

π

2

±

∆q

2

_

= cos

∆q

2

(109)

and sin[(π/2) + (∆q/2)] = sin[(π/2) − (∆q/2)]. For each q in the interval (π, 2π), there is a

companion q in the interval (0, π) that that has the same frequency. Similarly for each q in the

interval (π, 2π), there is a companion q in the interval (0, π) with the same eigenfunction modulo

a minus sign as can be seen from the relation,

sin(π ±∆q)p = ±cos πp sin ∆q p = ±(−1)

p

sin ∆q p, (110)

or

sin(π + ∆q)p = −sin(π −∆q)p. (111)

Now that we have the quantized values of q, we can demonstrate that the diﬀerent eigenvectors

are orthogonal and complete, i.e., we need to show that

˜ e

∗

q

· ˜ e

q

=

N

p=1

˜ e

q,p

˜ e

∗

q

,p

= δ

q,q

(112)

q

˜ e

∗

q,p

˜ e

q,p

= δ

p,p

. (113)

To show that the ﬁrst of these relations is true, we deﬁne

J

q,q

=

N

p=1

sin qp sin q

p =

1

4

N

p=1

_

e

i(q−q

)p

−e

i(q+q

)p

+ c.c.

_

(114)

=

1

2

(F

q−q

−F

q+q

), (115)

where c.c. signiﬁes the complex conjugate and

F

k

= Re

N

p=1

e

ikp

= Re

1 −e

ik(N+1)

1 −e

ik

−1 (116)

= Re

e

−ik/2

(1 −e

ik(N+1)

)

−2i sin(k/2)

−1 =

sin(k/2) + sin(N +

1

2

)k −2 sin(k/2)

2 sin(k/2)

(117)

=

sin(N +

1

2

)k −sin(k/2)

2 sin(k/2)

=

sin(N + 1)k cos(k/2) −cos(N + 1)k sin(k/2) −sin(k/2)

2 sin(k/2

(118)

= −

1

2

[cos(N + 1)k + 1] +

cos(k/2) sin(N + 1)k

2 sin(k/2)

(119)

= −

1

2

(1 −cos k(N + 1)) +

1

2

cos(k/2) sin k(N + 1)

2 sin(k/2

(120)

= −

1

2

(1 + (−1)

n

) + (N + 1)δ

k,0

(121)

15

where we used various trigonometric identities and the fact that k = nπ/(N +1) for some integer n,

so that cos k(N+1) = cos nπ = (−1)

n

, sin k(N+1) = sin nπ = 0 and lim

k→0

sin k(N+1)/ sin(k/2) =

2(N + 1) Thus,

J

q,q

=

1

2

_

−

1

2

(1 + (−1)

n−n

) + (N + 1)δ

q−q

,0

+

1

2

(1 + (−1)

n+n

) + (N + 1)δ

q+q

,0

_

=

1

2

(N+1)δ

q,q

(122)

where q = nπ/(N + 1) and q

= n

π/(N + 1). The choice C

q

=

_

2/(N + 1) then provides the

orthonormal eigenvectors we need.

˜ e

q

=

_

2

N + 1

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

sin q

sin 2q

.

.

.

sin Nq

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

. (123)

For N = 5, the ﬁve eigenvectors {˜ e

n

} are

˜ e

1

=

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

1

2

√

3

1

2

1

√

3

1

2

1

2

√

3

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

, ˜ e

2

=

_

_

_

_

_

_

1

2

1

2

0

1

2

1

2

_

_

_

_

_

_

, ˜ e

3

=

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

1

√

3

0

1

√

3

0

1

√

3

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

, ˜ e

4

=

_

_

_

_

_

_

1

2

−

1

2

0

1

2

−

1

2

_

_

_

_

_

_

, ˜ e

5

=

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

1

2

√

3

−

1

2

1

√

3

1

2

1

2

√

3

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

(124)

You should verify directly that these vectors do indeed form an orthonormal set.

2.2 An example with initial conditions

We now have all of the apparatus necessary to solve initial value problems for N coupled oscillators

with the geometry of Fig. 3. Suppose we impose initial conditions that at t = 0, all velocities are

zero and that particle p is at position x

p,0

. Then we can write

x(t) =

q

A

q

˜ e

q

cos ω

q

t (125)

where we can choose the cos solutions because we have set the velocities equal to zero. The positions

at t = 0 are, however, non-zero:

x(t = 0) = x

0

=

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

x

1,0

x

2,0

.

.

.

x

N,0

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

. (126)

We thus have

x

0

=

q

A

q

˜ e

q

. (127)

Our goal is to determine the values of the amplitudes A

q

. Once we know them, we know the time

evolution for all times t > 0. Equation 127 is a set of N coupled equations, and because the ˜ e

q

16

k

m m m m m m

k k k k k k

m m m m m m

k k k k k

(a)

(c)

(b)

m m

m

m m

m

Figure 5: Schematic of (a) free, (b) hybrid, and (c) free boundary conditions.

form a linearly independent set, this equation has a solution. It is straightforward to solve using

the orthogonality relations of the basis vectors ˜ e

q

. Simply take the dot product of both sides of the

equation with a particular member of this basis ˜ e

∗

s

:

˜ e

∗

s

· x

0

=

q

A

q

˜ e

∗

s

˜ e

q

=

q

A

q

δ

q,s

= A

s

, (128)

and the problem is solved. For all time t > 0,

x(t) =

q

(x

0

· ˜ e

∗

q

)˜ e

q

cos ω

q

t. (129)

2.2.1 Other Boundary Conditions

There are three other boundary conditions that are of physical interest: (1) The free chain with free

boundary conditions in which there are no terminal springs conﬁning the particles. There are then

N particles connected by N −1 springs; (2) A chain with hybrid boundary conditions with one end

(say the left end) clamped to the wall but the ﬁnal particle with no spring to its right; (3) Periodic

boundary conditions in which particle N is constrained to have exactly the same displacement as

particle 0. This condition can be thought of as tying the string of particle in a circular loop and

with particle 0 attached to particle N −1. (Note there are n particle because counting starts at 0,

not at 1.)

The ﬁrst observation is that the equations for particles not at the boundaries are the same for

all of these conditions and for the one with ﬁxed boundaries we just considered, so they will all have

the same dependence of eigenfrequencies ω

q

on q. The solutions with diﬀerent boundary conditions

will diﬀer in the values of q that are allowed (quantization condition) and possibly on the value of

the phase φ

q

, which was zero in the case of ﬁxed boundary conditions.

2.2.2 Free Boundary Conditions

We label the ﬁrst particle as 0 and the Nth particle as N

1

. The equations of motion for these two

particles are

m¨ x

0

= −k(x

0

−x

1

) →ω

2

x

0

= ω

2

0

(x

0

−x

1

) (130)

m¨ x

N−1

= −k(x

N−1

−x

N−2

) →ω

2

x

N−1

= ω

2

0

(x

N−1

−x

N−2

), (131)

where ω

2

0

= k/m. We try a solution in which x

p

∼ cos(qp+φ

q

). This form corresponds to changing

the φ

p

deﬁned earlier to −(π/2) + φ

q

. Inserting this form into the two equations above yields:

ω

2

q

cos φ

q

= ω

2

0

[cos φ

q

−cos(q + φ

q

)] (132)

ω

2

q

cos[q(N −1) + φ

q

] = ω

2

0

[cos[q(N −1) + φ

q

] −cos[q(N −2) + φ

q

]. (133)

17

We solve the ﬁrst equation ﬁrst. With some trivial trigonometric manipulation and using Eq. (105),

we ﬁnd

(1 −2 cos q) cos φ

q

= −cos(q + φ

q

) = −cos q cos φ

q

+ sin q sin φ

q

(134)

tan φ

q

=

1 −cos q

sin q

= tan q/2. (135)

Thus, φ

q

= q/2. We now use this result in the second boundary equation:

0 = −ω

2

q

cos q(N −

1

2

) + ω

2

0

[cos q(N −

1

2

) −cos q(N −

3

2

)] (136)

= (−ω

2

q

+ ω

2

0

) cos(N −

1

2

)q −ω

2

0

(cos q cos(N −

1

2

)q + sin q sin(N −

1

2

)q) (137)

= −ω

2

0

[(1 −cos q) cos(N −

1

2

)q + sin q sin(N −

1

2

)q sin q) (138)

= −ω

2

0

[cos(N −

1

2

)q −cos(N +

1

2

)q] = 2ω

2

0

sin qN sin(q/2) = 0. (139)

The “quantization constraints are, therefore,

q =

nπ

N

, n = 0, 1, ..., N −1 (140)

Note that q = 0 is include in the set. It must be there because we know that there must be a

pure translation mode with zero frequency. When q = 0, ω

q

= −0 as required, and in addition, the

amplitude at article p, cos(q(p+(1/2)) →1, is the same for every p as it is in a uniform translation.

2.2.3 Mixed boundary conditions

As shown in Fig. (5)(b) the left most particle (particle 1) is attached to a spring that is clamped in

a ﬁxed position, but the ﬁnal particle has no spring to its right. To satisfy the boundary condition

that the ﬁrst spring is clamped, we use the same ansatz as we used for the spring with ﬁxed

boundary conditions at both ends, i.e., x

q,p

= A

q,p

sin qpe

−iωqt

. The ﬁnal mass satisﬁes

m¨ x

n

= −k(x

N

−x

N−1

), (141)

implying

ω

2

q

sin qN = ω

2

0

[sin qN −sin q(N −1)] = ω

2

0

[sin qN −sin qN cos q = cos Nq sin q] (142)

= ω

2

0

(1 −cos q) sin qN + ω

2

0

cos Nq sin q. (143)

Using ω

2

q

= ω

2

0

(1 −cos q), we obtain

0 = (1 −cos q) sin Nq −cos Nq sin q = 2 sin

2

(q/2) sin Nq −2 sin(q/2) cos(q/2) cos Nq (144)

0 = sin(q/2) sin Nq −cos(q/2) cos Nq = −cos(N +

1

2

)q, (145)

which implies

(N +

1

2

)q = (n +

1

2

)π (146)

where k = 0, 1, · · · N −1 is an integer. Thus

q =

(2n + 1)π

2N + 1

. (147)

18

2.2.4 Periodic boundary conditions

There is another boundary condition that is used extensively that in some sense eliminates bound-

aries altogether. This is the periodic boundary condition in which displacements satisfy the peri-

odicity condition

x

p

= x

p+N

(148)

for some integer N for all positions p. You can think of this boundary condition as arising from

wrapping the line of springs around a ring so that the Nth particle and the zeroth one are actually

identical. The periodicity condition is trivially satisﬁed if

x

p

= A

q,p

e

ipq

= x

p+N

= A

q,p

e

iq(p+N)

(149)

provided

q =

2πn

N

(150)

for n = 0, 1, · · · (N − 1) . Note that n = 0, which corresponds to q = 0 and to a zero-frequency

mode (ω

q=0

= 0). This is not surprising because q = 0 implies that all particles move the same

amount, e

iqp

= 1 when q = 0, implying that no springs are stretched or compressed.

For all of the other boundary conditions, q is restricted to lie between 0 and π. For periodic

boundary conditions, q lies between 0 and 2π. What is going on? It turns out that the eigenmodes

under periodic are traveling waves that can move either to the right or left whereas the eigenmodes

under the other boundary conditions are stationary. To see why this is, we ﬁrst note that periodic

eigenfunction satisﬁes e

iqp

= e

i(q+2π)p

for every p, so rather than restricting q to lie between 0 and

2π, we could equally well restrict it to lie between −π and π. Or in equivalently restrict n to lie

between −N/2 and N/2. Or course, we have to distinguish between systems with N odd and N

even. In the former case, n = −

1

2

(N −1), −

1

2

(N −3), · · · , −1, 0, 1, · · · ,

1

2

(N −1), and in the latter

case, n = −

1

2

N + 1, −

1

2

N + 2, · · · , −1, 0, 1, · · · ,

1

2

N − 1,

1

2

N. Thus, q can be either positive or

negative. Now, consider the full time dependence of the displacements for a particular mode q:

x

q,p

(t) = Re(A

q

e

i(qp−ωqt)

) = |A

q

| cos(qp −ω

q

t −δ

q

), (151)

where δ

q

is the phase of the complex amplitude A

q

. This function is a maximum whenever

qp −ω

q

t −δ

q

= 0; or p = p

0q

+

ω

q

q

t. (152)

where p

0q

= δ

q

/q. At time t = 0, the maximum occurs at p = p

0

. Of course p

0q

is not in general

an integer, but the function x

q,p

(t) makes sense even when p and p

0q

are not integers. At time t

later the maximum that was originally at p = p

0

has moved to a new position p

0q

+

ωq

q

t. In other

words, the maximum move with a constant “velocity” v

q

= ω

q

t. The particles themselves do not

move with this velocity: they oscillate back and forth (or up and down) with frequency ω

q

. It is

only the peak in the amplitude that moves. When q > 0, the peak moves to the right; but it q < 0,

the peak positions is at

p = p

0q

−

ω

q

|q|

t. (153)

Thus the peak that was originally at position p

0q

not moves to the left rather than to the right.

19

m m m m m m

k

a

k

a

k

a

k

a

k

b

k

b

k

b

1 2 2 2 1 1

Figure 6: A linear ball and spring system in with springs of alternating spring constants k

a

and k

b

.

There is a repeated unit cell (enclosed in the dashed box) with two balls, each of mass m.

It is instructive to return to the other boundary conditions. Their time-dependent displacements

in mode q are

x

q,p

(t) = Re

_

A

q

sin(qp + φ

q

)e

−iωqt

¸

= B

q

sin(qp + φ

q

) cos(ω

q

t −δ

q

)

= |A

q

|Re

_

1

2i

_

e

i(qp+φq)

−e

−i(qp+φq)

_

e

−i(ωqt−δq)

_

=

1

2

|A

q

|[sin(qp −ω

q

t + α

q+

) + sin(qp + ω

q

t + α

q−

)] (154)

where α

q,±

= φ

q

±δ

q

. The ﬁrst sin function in the last equation describes a wave traveling to the

right, and the second to a wave traveling to the left: the standing waves are a linear combination

of right and left-going waves.

2.3 A periodic chain with alternating spring constants

In our study of vibrations of a small number of coupled oscillators, we considered situations in

which diﬀerent springs and particles had diﬀerent spring constants and masses. As the number

or particles grows, the number or arrangements of diﬀerent springs and masses also grows, and

it is an almost impossible task to obtain general expressions for the eigenfrequencies that applies

to all systems. There are, however, special arrangements of diﬀerent springs and masses that are

physically important. Solids composed of more that one type of atom, for example, have periodically

repeated unit cells composed of two or more diﬀerent atoms. Here we consider the simplest model

of such a system: a ball-and-spring model connected by springs whose spring constants alternate

between k

a

and k

b

as shown in Fig. (6). This give us a repeated pattern of cells consisting of two

equal-mass balls. We label the cell by an integer p and the two balls within each cell by 1 ad 2.

The displacement from equilibrium of ball 1 in cell p is x

p,1

and that of ball 2 is x

p,2

.

The equations of motion for the two balls are

d

2

x

p,1

dt

2

= −ω

2

a

(x

p,1

−x

p−1,2

) −ω

2

b

(x

p,1

−x

p,2

) (155)

d

2

x

p,2

dt

2

= −ω

2

a

(x

p,2

−x

p+1,1

) −ω

2

b

(x

p,2

−x

p,1

), (156)

where ω

2

a

= k

a

/m and ω

2

b

= k

b

/m. We consider periodic boundary conditions and take

x

p,α

= A

q,α

e

i(qp−ωt)

, α = q, 2, (157)

where to satisfy the periodic boundary conditions that x

p+Nc,α

= x

p,α

, where N

c

is the number of

cells, q = 2πn/N

c

with n an integer. With this form, the equations of motion become

ω

2

A

q,1

= (ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

)A

q,1

−ω

2

a

e

−iq

A

q,2

−ω

2

b

A

q,2

(158)

ω

2

A

q,2

= (ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

)A

q,2

−ω

2

a

e

iq

A

q,1

−ω

2

b

A

q,1

. (159)

20

-3 -2 -1 1 2 3

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

q

2

b

ω

2

a

ω

( ) q ω

Figure 7: The vibration (phonon) spectrum (frequency as a function of q) of a two-particle unit

cell one-dimensional ball-and-spring model. Note the bandgap at q = π.

This equation can be rewritten in matrix form as

ω

2

A

q

= DDD(q)A

q

, (160)

where

DDD =

_

ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

−(ω

2

b

+ ω

2

a

e

−iq

)

−(ω

2

b

+ ω

2

a

e

iq

) ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

_

. (161)

is the q-dependent dynamical matrix. Note that the oﬀ-diagonal entries are complex, but the 21

component is the complex conjugate of the 21 component. This means that the eigenvalues of DDD(q)

are real. To determine the, we proceed as usual and calculate the roots of the polynomial,

det[DDD(q) −ω

2

III] = (ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

−ω

2

)

2

(ω

2

b

+ ω

2

a

e

−iq

)(ω

2

b

+ ω

2

a

e

iq

) (162)

= (ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

−ω

2

)

2

−(ω

4

a

+ ω

4

b

+ ω

2

a

ω

2

b

cos q) (163)

The roots, which are plotted in Fig. (7), are

ω

2

±

(q) = ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

±

_

(ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

)

2

−4ω

2

a

ω

2

b

sin

2

(q/2). (164)

The limits of these two solutions as q →0 and q →π are informative:

ω

2

−

→

_

ω

2

a

ω

2

b

2(ω

2

a

+ω

2

a

)

q

2

as q →0

2ω

2

b

as q →π;

(165)

ω

2

+

→

_

2(ω

2

a

+ ω

2

b

) as q →0

2ω

2

a

as q →π.

(166)

(167)

The solutions assume ω

a

> ω

b

; the two frequencies are interchanged is the opposite is true. Thus

ω

(

q) tends linearly to zero with q, yielding a zero frequency modes at q = 0 as it most. ω

+

(q = 0) on

the other hand is nonzero. At q = π the two frequencies are diﬀerent: ω

+

(π) =

√

2ω

a

> ω

−

(π) =

√

2ω

b

. There is a gap in the spectrum. When ω

b

→ ω

a

, the gap vanishes and the spectrum is

continuous. The existence of such band gaps, particularly in electronic as opposed to vibrational

properties, and being able to control them is essential to the electronics industry.

21

- Trench Lagrange MultipliersUploaded byCarolina Torres Lozano Ψ
- Sydsaether Students Manual Further Smfmea2Uploaded bymicpic
- Differential Equations and Linear Algebra 4th Edition - Stephen W. GoodeUploaded byHaimu Cao
- Response Method TheoryUploaded byerpixaa
- hw1Uploaded byhonestcheater
- Supplier Selection Criteria Using the Analytical Network Process MethodUploaded byInternational Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
- Mathematics (Introduction to Linear Algebra)Uploaded byshilpajoseph
- SOLUTION OF EQUATION AX + XB = C BY INVERSION OF AN M ×M OR N × N MATRIXUploaded byPeet89
- Linear Algebra SolutionsUploaded byDKz
- Midterm 2 SolUploaded byThuVien
- MDOF_review_061904.pdfUploaded bysandy
- Notes 2Uploaded bychoupunk
- JMathPhys_34_2968 HojmanUploaded byVarov
- 4.6 Steady State ProbabilitiesUploaded byŞafak Ekrem Aşık
- TEST ON ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS.docxUploaded byjhacademyhyd
- MP1718Uploaded byPaul Lee
- Dissonant Counterpoint TenneyUploaded byBrice Jackson
- Lecture 1 Matrix Algebra(1)Uploaded bySergio Nassar
- Phase PortraitsUploaded byShivam
- UOL Statistic 2 Exam Commentary Zone AUploaded byBoon Kiat Teh
- Coho m OlogyUploaded byJackSmith
- Lecture 02 TueUploaded byAriel
- Control Eng IIIUploaded byeuticus
- Linear Algebra Study Guide: MITUploaded byFroForSale
- civilbe.pdfUploaded bynilang
- A Spectral Approach to BandwidthUploaded byforoud_makvandi1985
- Google Page RankingUploaded byKundanPratap
- Allen M.R. 1996 - Monte Carlo SSA_ Detecting Irregular Oscillations in the Presence of Coloured NoiseUploaded byerik
- A Tutorial on Principal Component AnalysisUploaded byrigasti
- r5102305-mathematics-for-biotechnologistsUploaded bysivabharathamurthy

- Cold War FinalUploaded byJustin Wong
- Sun_Lab1Uploaded byJustin Wong
- Standards Board Manual_2012 (2)Uploaded byJustin Wong
- Hanhimaki, Westad. the Plot Against Stalin.Uploaded byJustin Wong
- sol2Uploaded byJustin Wong
- Schwabl Chapter 3Uploaded byJustin Wong
- Ideal Gas Lab report.docUploaded byJustin Wong
- InterferenceUploaded byJustin Wong
- Evans Grubbs on the FamilyUploaded byJustin Wong
- According to Aristotle in His PoeticsUploaded byJustin Wong
- In His Series of Lectures on the Idea of a UniversityUploaded byJustin Wong

- Ee6604 2m - Important FormulaUploaded bypalanisekar
- APPIUM DocumentUploaded byvaditya2005
- BC129Uploaded bycenk
- 2014-Test01-Chap00 Preamble Chap01 PD and RPD-with AnswersUploaded byPritum Suthar
- 304040A Unistar System Reference Manual Aug1982Uploaded byAdriano Henrique
- 317690092-GS-GR-COR-111.pdfUploaded byjmja2528
- Image Processing 3Uploaded bykamar
- An Introduction to Time Waveform AnalysisUploaded byMohd Asiren Mohd Sharif
- ARM 7 Lab ManualUploaded byultimatekp144
- Peavey Powered Mixer XR684 SchematicUploaded byJose Fco. Aleman Arriaga
- Computer Networks mcq.pdfUploaded bysantoshmanoj05
- Kenwood NEXEDGE Digital LMR UHF/VHF PortablesUploaded bySparky01
- Atari 800 Operating System Manual, part 1 of 4Uploaded byrybagz
- Milestones in the history of OFDM. Uploaded bysnanm
- West Voss Gaze TrackingUploaded byFateeha Fatima Turk
- Flexural Behaviour of Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Beams Using Fly Ash Partially Replaced with GGBSUploaded byIRJET Journal
- Power Electronics Isn't Just ElectricalUploaded byDinesh Sharma
- Communications201208 DlUploaded bySteven Rankine
- Basic ItisUploaded byDeena Dayalan
- SS7 Pocket GuideUploaded bychenyuanchun
- Configuring MQTT on the Raspberry PiUploaded byMauricio Montaño
- Auxiliary and Control CablesUploaded byIsagani Madrid
- Minifrac TestsUploaded byRizalzi Bachtiar
- CreateSpace.java.to.python.1537362089Uploaded byshorinryu
- dome structuresUploaded byapi-272563913
- A2_Sajjad_Mubin.pdfUploaded bySajjad Mubin
- Livchak ASHRAE Journal Chilled Beam & DOASUploaded byByeong-Taek Yun
- GEOG 201 Final NotesUploaded byRoss McCandless
- Comparative Study on Conventional and Simplified Elastic Analysis of Rectangular Combined FootingUploaded byInternational Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology
- On thermal effects in viscoplasticity.pdfUploaded byernestnsabimana74