Garcia V Scientology: Garcias' Proposed Amended Complaint

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 31
 
EXHIBIT
Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 106-1 Filed 04/07/14 Page 1 of 31 PageID 2549
 
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE
DISTRICT OF FLORID T MP
DIVISION LUIS
A.
G RCI
SAZ
and
wife, MARIA
DEL
Case No. 8:13-CV-220-T27 TBM
ROCIO
BURGOS GARCIA, Plaintiffs, vs.
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
FLAG
SERVICE
ORGANIZATION, INC.;
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FL G SHIP SERVICE
ORGANIZATION, INC., d/b/a Majestic Cruise Lines; Defendants.
roposed
AMENDED
COMPL INT
AND DEMAND
FOR
JURY TRI L
Plaintif
fs
, LUIS
A
GARCIA SAZ ( LUIS GARCIA ) and wife, MARIA DEL ROCIO BURGOS GARCIA ( MARIA GARCIA ), sue Defendants CHURCH
OF
SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SERVICE ORGANIZATION, INC., a Florida nonprofit corporation ( FLAG ); and CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SHIP SERVICE ORGANIZATION, INC., d/b/a Majestic Cruise Lines, a foreign nonprofit corporation doing business
in
Florida ( SHIP ) and allege as follows:
INTRODUCTION
1.
This suit arises out
of
a systemic and unfair practice orchestrated against, among others, Plaintif
fs
by
the Defendants and facilitated
by
the concerted, fraudulent conduct
of
each
of
them. Through deceptive acts in the
fo
rm
of
representa
ti
ons and o
mi
ssions which Defenda
nt
s knew were
li
kely to mislead Pla
in
ti
ffs
to
their detrimen
t
Plaintiffs suffered
Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 106-1 Filed 04/07/14 Page 2 of 31 PageID 2550
 
financial losses caused by Defendants' soliciting contributions for purposes that were never fulfilled and for failing to repay deposits for future services that were never rendered and for fraud as hereinafter alleged.
2
As detailed below, Defendants directly owed duties to Plaintiffs, including duties
of
full disclosure, to accurately and truthfully represent the nature and purpose
of
the solicited funds that Plaintiffs transferred for the Defendants' benefit. Plaintiffs' agreement
to
transfer their funds was predicated on the trust and confidence Plaintiffs believed they had with Defendants, and the mistaken belief that FLAG and SHIP would not defraud Plaintiffs as Defendants have,
in
fact, done. The loss
of
Plaintiffs' funds
is
a direct and proximate cause
of
Defendants' wrongful actions.
3
Plaintiffs were formerly members
of
the Church
of
Scientology until November
of
2010, when they concluded that the Church had lost its spiritual, moral, and financial compass under the leadership
of
David Miscavige, the self-titled ecclesiastical leader
of
the Scientology religion. 
4
The Church
of
Scientology refers to the hierarchical structure
of
the Scientology movement, which is comprised
of
various corporations and related entities, operating under the leadership
of
David Miscavige. These form a complicated web
of
entities, trusts and acronyms intended to make it difficult,
if
not impossible,
to
follow the money. While the various entities make some efforts
to
appear distinct, they are not in fact separate, with employees
of
FLAG and SHIP performing the functions
of
nominal entities, even directing Plaintiffs and others
to
make out checks
to
bank accounts
in
other entities' names. 5. The victims
of
Defendants' fraud are often left without recourse because Defendants, Page 2
of3
Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 106-1 Filed 04/07/14 Page 3 of 31 PageID 2551

Reward Your Curiosity

Everything you want to read.
Anytime. Anywhere. Any device.
No Commitment. Cancel anytime.
576648e32a3d8b82ca71961b7a986505