You are on page 1of 6

We're losing control of our digital privacy - CNN.

com

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/26/opinion/mackinnon-sopa-governmen...

You've selected the International Edition. Would you like to make this your default edition?
EDITION: INTERNATIONAL TV:
CNNi CNN en Espaol U.S. MXICO ARABIC

Yes | No
Sign up

Close

Log in

Set edition preference

Home

Video

World

U.S.

Africa

Asia

Europe

Latin America

Middle East

Business

World Sport

Entertainment

Tech

Travel

iReport

We're losing control of our digital privacy


By Rebecca MacKinnon, Special to CNN
January 29, 2012 -- Updated 1458 GMT (2258 HKT)

SHARE THIS
Print Email Recommend More sharing 647

Most Popular
Today's five most popular stories E-mail is vulnerable to government surveillance, Rebecca MacKinnon writes.

Indiana groom dies in road accident hours after wedding Colorado shooting victim described as sweet, smart, a horse lover More snow to dust the Northeast, Midwest -enough to boost holiday spirit Neo-Nazis attack anti-racism demonstrators in Sweden Bus falls off freeway, kills at least 18 in Philippines

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
Rebecca MacKinnon: Government's surveillance powers have expanded She says government and companies can spy on our digital communications FBI can get records without court orders, she writes; companies can't be sued We need to protect our security, she says, but also defend our privacy rights

Editor's note: Rebecca MacKinnon is a Bernard L. Schwartz senior fellow at the New America Foundation, co-founder of the international bloggers' network Global Voices Online, and a founding board member of the Global Network Initiative. She is the author of "Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom." (CNN) -- Last week, millions of Americans stood up against the Stop Online Piracy Act and the Senate's related anti-piracy bill. Given the public outcry, it is not surprising that all four Republican presidential candidates have come out against them. But online censorship in the name of fighting piracy is only one of many issues affecting Americans' digital freedom. Americans who care about their online freedoms should also be asking tough questions about the government's expanding surveillance powers. As we grow increasingly dependent on the Internet and cell phones for all aspects of our lives, government abuse of citizens' privacy requires the cooperation of the private sector. This includes companies running our Internet and wireless service providers, e-mail, and social networking services, as well as manufacturers of the devices we use to connect. Google's announcement earlier this week that it will integrate user information across its search engine, Gmail, YouTube and its 57 other services stirred criticism from privacy groups and some members of Congress. People have good reason to be unhappy about losing control over who and what services know what about them. But that is far from the only way in which we are losing control. Under two successive administrations, new laws, policies and

More from CNN Video


Why she sold her daughter's virginity

Macpherson's husband faces lawsuit

Colorado shooting: 80 seconds of terror

Most influential man of 2013?

More from CNN


China is not ending its human

1 de 6

16/12/2013 09:02

We're losing control of our digital privacy - CNN.com

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/26/opinion/mackinnon-sopa-governmen...

corporate practices have made it much easier for government agencies to track and access citizens' private digital communications from their storage "in the cloud" than it is for agents to search or monitor our physical homes, offices, vehicles, and mail. The erosion of privacy rights under the Fourth Amendment, written to protect us against unreasonable search and seizure, began in earnest under President George W. Bush. The Patriot Act, passed overwhelmingly but hastily after 9/11, allows the FBI to obtain telecommunication, financial, and credit records without a court order. Moreover, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act's 2008 amendment act grants U.S. companies immunity from being sued by their customers when they comply even with blatantly illegal government surveillance requests. As a presidential candidate in 2008, Barack Obama pledged to reform the Patriot Act and rescind the FISA Amendments Act, but as president he reversed his position. The Obama administration has fought bipartisan efforts in Congress to bring the change he once championed. The result is the "new normal": surveillance, often of questionable legality and sometimes clear illegality, against which Americans have little effective recourse, on the rare occasions that we even know that violations are taking place. Most of what we do know is thanks to whistle-blowers, activists, academics and a few committed journalists. In 2004, Mark Klein, a technician who had just retired from AT&T, disclosed that in 2003 the National Security Agency built a secret room at the San Francisco facility where he worked, routing all e-mail and phone traffic through it. Another whistle-blower, Justice Department attorney Thomas Tamm, confirmed that similar interception points were set up around the country to gather and analyze the e-mails and phone calls of Americans who were not suspected of any crime. While the federal government is required by law to document publicly its wiretapping of phone lines, it is not required to do so with Internet communications. Over 50,000 National Security Letters, a kind of administrative demand letter requiring no probable cause or judicial oversight, are issued each year. Yet we know few details. Companies complying with these secret letters were barred from even informing customers about them until 2009 when Nick Merrill, an entrepreneur who ran a small New York-based Internet service company, successfully enlisted the help of the ACLU in challenging a blanket gag provision of the Patriot Act. Last year, the Electronic Frontier Foundation published a report analyzing the FBI's use of National Security Letters from 2001 to 2008, concluding that the FBI might have violated the law as many as 40,000 times during that period. In many cases the companies involved -- including phone companies, Internet service providers, financial institutions, and credit agencies -- "contributed in some way to the FBI's unauthorized receipt of personal information." In the Internet age, it is inevitable that corporations and government agencies will have access to detailed information about people's lives. We willingly share personal information with companies for the convenience of using their products. We accept that a certain amount of surveillance is necessary in order to protect innocent people from crime and terror. But as a nation we have failed to address the resulting dilemma: How do we prevent the abuse of the power we have willingly delegated to government and companies? If anything is clear from the political arguments raging throughout the country, it is that Americans worry, with good reason, about manipulation and abuse by both the private and the public sector. The Republican primary field is not unified on how to handle surveillance: Romney and Gingrich advocate expanding the Patriot Act's surveillance powers. Ron Paul would repeal it. In Congress, debates about surveillance cross party lines. The Patriot Act and FISA Amendments Act have staunch supporters as well as fierce opponents among Republicans, Democrats, and

rights abuses

Why do French think Bob Dylan's racist?

Use your money to buy happier time

From Around the Web


Iran gets an early Christmas gift: Turkey Nikkei Asian Review North Korean Leaders Aunt Appears Unscathed The New York Times
Recommended by

Sponsored links Blue OfficeMall - Santos Na Vila Matias. A Partir de 42m. Unio Perfeita Entre Office e Mall! theblueofficemall.com.br/Santos Pedra Bonita Turismo Pacotes nacionais e internacionais Excurses 2014 em at 10X. Confira! www.pedrabonitaturismo.com.br Pea seu Carto Bradesco Solicite o seu Carto de Crdito e tenha benefcios exclusivos! bradescocartoes.com.br

2 de 6

16/12/2013 09:02

We're losing control of our digital privacy - CNN.com

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/26/opinion/mackinnon-sopa-governmen...

independents. The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011, which exempts companies from liability for sharing data with the government, is one of several bills introduced in Congress last year that civil liberties groups -- and in this case even the White House -- warn will lead to further erosion of consumer privacy. The advent of the Internet does not change a bedrock truth upon which our nation was founded: The survival of American democracy depends as much on the defense of liberty as it does on the defense of our physical security. Those two ideals always have been and always will be in tension; but without a healthy balance between them -- online as well as offline -- we cannot live free of fear. Fortunately, the Supreme Court takes our Fourth Amendment rights seriously -- even when the executive and legislative branches of our government fail to do so -- as demonstrated by Monday's unanimous ruling that these rights were violated when police secretly planted GPS devices on a suspect's vehicle without a court order. Rather than waiting for the Supreme Court to reverse bad law and unconstitutional law enforcement, however, Americans can exercise their power through the ballot box to prevent violations from happening in the first place. In 2012, the American people rightly expect presidential and congressional candidates to explain how they plan to protect us from crime and terror. In the Internet age, that inevitably requires some degree of surveillance. Yet it is equally vital we demand a clear vision of how they will protect us from abuses of government surveillance power through the corporate-run digital platforms upon which we are increasingly dependent. Follow CNN Opinion on Twitter. Join the conversation on Facebook.
The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Rebecca MacKinnon.

132
Comments

SHARE THIS

647
Recommend

Print Email More sharing

We recommend

Opinion: U.S. VP Joe Biden flies into diplomatic turbulence in Asia

State-of-the-art military planes vie for air supremacy in Middle East

Sleeping with the fish: Underwater hotel room opens on remote African island

Maria Sharapova has a new man in her life

From around the web

China may tighten screws on North Korea after purge


(Nikkei Asian Review)

Borderline Insanity at the 9 Hot Toys That Every Fence in Nogales Kid Wants This Year
(The New York Times) (Business Insider)

Unintended Consequences of Fuel Efficiency are Costly to Americans


(Quartz)
Recommended by

Sponsored links The Ritz-Carlton Israel


Luxury Residences in Herzliya Prices Start at $850,000 rcr-herzliya.com/Luxury_Apartments

E27

Big Savings on LED Light Bulbs, Up to 65% OFF and Free Shipping www.miniinthebox.com

Hotis a partir de R$ 36

Hotis e pousadas com at 90% de desconto. Venha conferir! www.hotelurbano.com

3 de 6

16/12/2013 09:02

We're losing control of our digital privacy - CNN.com

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/26/opinion/mackinnon-sopa-governmen...

4 de 6

16/12/2013 09:02

We're losing control of our digital privacy - CNN.com

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/26/opinion/mackinnon-sopa-governmen...

Comments for this thread are now closed.

132 comments
Best MikeyZ3

Just remember, kids: if you're getting the service for free, you're not the consumer. You're the product.

georgetown

Dear Google, You are not my Big Brother. Because of your outrageous new privacy violations, I have deleted my google account. I will also not use your google maps service, and my Android is up for sale. I realize that my departure does not cost you anything directly, but if enough of us take action, it will hit you when you suddenly aren't getting the revenue you once were. My replacement communication service is not free, but my privacy is more important than saving a few dollars per month. Kind regards, Former Google Sucker

nero1090

Yeah - I did the same. I am sick and tired of internet giants depriving me of privacy and have the audacity to call this "Privacy Policy".

LaughingMan7

Lol CNN. "Worry about your online privacy!" then a link to "Join the conversation on Facebook"

LaughingMan7

@Ruddy Yeah - I am not worried about my online privacy. I don't say anything online I wouldn't say in person. It is my right as an American to have radical opinions if I want to. If someone wants to tell me otherwise, I'm happy to settle it in court.

NS151

Download the "Facebook Disconnect" for Chrome/Firefox and Facebook can't follow where you go anymore.

Ruddy

If that's not bad enough, sites can read your Facebook cookies and link the two together. Have you ever wondered why sometimes your Facebook buddies opinions show up on an article your reading on CNN?!

Ruddy

I agree with your philosophy laughingman, but (the proverbial 'but') these companies should not be able to share info via cookies on your computer. CNN and Facebook are two different entities, therefore, if either wants to access the others' cookies on my computer, in my house, they should have to ask permission each and every time. I find just being logged into Facebook and another site at the same time can facilitate the connectivity....

Rad666

5 de 6

16/12/2013 09:02

We're losing control of our digital privacy - CNN.com

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/26/opinion/mackinnon-sopa-governmen...

55

HI 56 LO 43 London, United Kingdom Weather forecast

Home | Video | World | U.S. | Africa | Asia | Europe | Latin America | Middle East | Business | World Sport | Entertainment | Tech | Travel | iReport Tools & Widgets | RSS | Podcasts | Blogs | CNN Mobile | My Profile | E-mail Alerts | CNN Shop | Site map | CNN Partner Hotels

2013 Cable News Network. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of service | Privacy guidelines | Ad choices | Advertise with us | License our content | About us | Contact us | Work for us | Help

CNN en ESPAOL | CNN Chile | CNN Mxico | | | Trke CNN TV | HLN | Transcripts

6 de 6

16/12/2013 09:02

You might also like