- Parent Stock Handbook
- David Odom, Florida Engineering Society Presentation9/24/08
- Plastic Shrinkage Cracks Pak
- 5976
- Psych Rome Trics
- Air Compressor Sizing
- infors minitron-e shaking incubator
- Hematra Cooling Tower
- Coating Inspection Book
- Surgery Application
- Astm d2029 Dew Pt
- 2 CT-Theory
- Introduction to HYSYS Plant2.2 bubble dew & Flashes.doc
- DISCUSSION.docx
- ECM216 BUILDING SERVICES Bab 2.2.1 Phychrometric Chart
- Traduccion-tuneles en Ingles
- ETPFGM'10-33
- Heat Transfer Review
- Cryogenic EX Loss
- UAE- Climate Design Conditions
- ESE Syllabus
- Lecture 1 Intro
- GATE-2013-14 Syllabus Mechanical-ME, Gate Mechanical Syllabus 2013-GATE-Coaching
- Storage Tank Heat Loss Calcs - 28.09.2009
- ass_5
- Past Final Papers 3 hm
- Double Pipe Heat Exchanger
- Finite Element Equations for Heat Transfer
- Heating Coil Sizing for Fuel Oil Tank
- NR-310804- Mass Transfer Operations -I
- Jinan Shandong,China
- ExpressPCB2.pdf
- IHS- August 2011
- Neagu Djuvara - Istoria Romanilor Povestita Tinerilor - 2011 -
- Chlormequat Red
- Chemische Fabrik Kalk - Calciumchlorid
- Express Pcb 2
- Funke Shell Tube He e
- Hazard and Operability Study - Wikipedia
- Dormitor Kim 3
- calciumchlorid-30-technisch
- Family_e
- Strategie Dezvoltare Onesti
- Harta Orasului Targu Neamt
- ParChem -Hexachloroacetone Supplier Distributor
- CO3_2015_LOW_67-71
- CO3_2015_LOW_42-47
- CO3_2015_LOW_53-59
- CO3_2015_LOW_20-27
- London Metal Exchange Prices - Markets Data Center - WSJ
- Safety in Sulfuric Acid Storage Tanks - Chem. Eng. 11-2015
- Heat exchanger duty.pdf
- CO3_2015_LOW_42-47
- Particle size reduction CHE_Facts_1112.pdf
- Cooling towers design feb12_CHENG.pdf
- Live Gold Price, Silver Price and Spot Precious Metals Quotes and Charts
- Marcare SOD-80 Diodes
- CO3_2015_LOW_80-82
- CO3_2015_LOW_67-71
- Valves CHE_Facts_0808.pdf

**Effective Thermal Design Of Cooling Towers
**

A step-by-step approach to cooling-tower design, with an example calculation to make it clear

Jonny Goyal Air Liquide Engineering and Construction, Lurgi India

t2 t1 twb tdb td

NOMEnCLATURE

Hot water temperature, °C Cold water temperature, °C Wet-bulb temperature, °C Dry-bulb temperature, °C Dew point temperature, °C Enthalpy of moist air, kJ/kg Enthalpy of inlet air, kJ/kg Enthalpy of exit air, kJ/kg Enthalpy of fin, kJ/kg

V

arious misconceptions arise when it comes to the thermal design of cooling towers. Sometimes related parameters, such as range, approach, effectiveness, liquid-to-gas ratio (L/G), wet-bulb temperature, cooling water temperature, relative humidity, number of transfer units (NTU) and other terms create a confusion for the designer in effectively sizing, selecting and evaluating a particular cooling tower. This leads to inadequate design. The objective of this article is to present a stepwise understanding of how to calculate the NTU for a cooling tower, and thus to understand the basis of thermal design of counterflow cooling towers for optimizing cost and performance.

First, let’s look at some of the basic terms and briefly describe their significance and role in cooling tower design and performance. Dry-bulb temperature. Dry-bulb temperature (tdb) — usually referred to as the air temperature — is the property of air that is most commonly used. When people refer to the temperature of the air, they are normally referring to its dry-bulb temperature. The dry-bulb temperature is an indicator of heat content and is shown along the bottom axis of a psychometric chart. The vertical lines extending upward from this axis are constanttemperature lines. Wet-bulb temperature. Wet-bulb temperature (twb) is the reading when the bulb of a thermometer is covered

24

Definitions

with a wet cloth, and the instrument is whirled around in a sling. The wetbulb temperature is the lowest temperature that can be reached by evaporation of water only. Relative humidity (RH). RH is the ratio of the partial pressure of water vapor in air over the saturation vapor pressure at a given temperature. When the relative humidity is 100%, the air is saturated and therefore, water will not evaporate further. Therefore, when the RH is 100% the wet-bulb temperature is the same as the dry-bulb temperature, because the water cannot evaporate any more. Range. The range is the difference in temperature of inlet hot water (t2) and outlet cold water (t1), t2 – t1. A high cooling-tower range means that the cooling tower has been able to reduce the water temperature effectively. Approach. The approach is the difference in temperature of outlet cold water and ambient wet-bulb temperature, t1 – tw. The lower the approach, the better the cooling tower performance. Although both range and approach should be monitored, the approach is a better indicator of cooling tower performance. Cooling tower capability. The capability of the cooling tower is a measure of how close the tower can bring the hot water temperature to the wetbulb temperature of the entering air. A larger cooling tower (that is, more air or more fill) will produce a closer approach (colder outlet water) for a given heat load, flowrate and entering air condition. The lower the wet-bulb

h a h1 h2 h’

F Flowrate, m3/h L Mass flowrate of liquid, lb/h G Mass flowrate of gas, lb/h Q Heat load, kcal/h Z Altitude above sea level, m p Barometric pressure, kPa Saturation pressure of water pws vapor, kPa pw Partial pressure of water vapor, kPa v Specific volume, m3/kg W Humidity ratio, kg water/kg air Humidity ratio at saturation air, kg Ws water/kg moist air Relative humidity (RH), % C Constant related to cooling tower design m Slope of tower characteristic curve

temperature, which indicates either cool air, low humidity or a combination of the two, the lower the cooling tower can cool the water. Capability tests are conducted per the ATC-105 Code of the Cooling Tower Institute (CTI; Houston; www.cti.org). The thermal performance of the cooling tower is thus affected by the entering wet-bulb temperature. The entering air dry-bulb temperature has an insignificant effect on thermal performance. Effectiveness. A cooling tower’s effectiveness is quantified by the ratio of the actual range to the ideal range, that is, the difference between cooling water inlet temperature and ambient wet-bulb temperature. It is defined in terms of percentage.

CHEMIcAL ENGINEERING WWW.cHE.cOM FEBRUARY 2012

This plot. in a counterflow cooling tower. The saturated air film offers no resistance to heat transfer. and is determined by the product of mass flowrate of water. The force driving heat transfer is the differential enthalpy between the saturated and bulk air. Cooling capacity.000 Btu/h = 3. shows the enthalpy versus temperature for water and air Liquid-to-gas ratio (L/G). a degree of difficulty to cooling is represented by the Merkel equation: (2) Where: K = overall enthalpy transfer coefficient. The cooling characteristic.025. °C 50 55 Saturation curve Enthalpy driving force. hA 260 240 Enthalpy. hA tan = L/G FIGURE 1. hA Water droplet Air enthalpy. the slope of which is the ratio of liquid (water) to air (L/G). times the specific heat times the temperature difference. The main assumptions of Merkel theory are the following: 1. but seasonal variations require adjustment and tuning of water and air flowrates to get the best cooling tower effectiveness. The saturated air film is at the temperature of the bulk water. 6. The Merkel equation is derived by considering a falling water droplet surrounded by saturated air A (1) FIGURE 2. (hw . The process is illustrated in the so-called driving-force diagram shown in Figure 2. lb/h Equation 2 basically says that at any point in the tower. Also called the tower coefficient. The air film is represented by the water operating line on the saturation curve. The main air is represented by the air operating line. heat and mass transfer takes place from the interface air film to the upstream air. which plots enthalpy versus temperature. lb/h-ft2 a = Surface area per unit tower volume.Saturated air film enthalpy. The heat transferred from the air to Theory — the Merkel equation the film by convection is proportional to the heat transferred from the film to the ambient air by evaporation.hA) B Water operating line. The model is based on a drop of water falling through an upstream flow of unsaturated air at a wet-bulb temperature of twb with enthalpy hA (Figure 1). hw C D Air operating line. The value of NTU is also representative of the degree of difficulty for the cooling process. The loss of water by evaporation is neglected. ft2/ft3 V = Effective tower volume. The same calculations applied to a set of test conditions is called the available coefficient of the tower involved. The cooling capacity of a tower is the heat rejected [kcal/h or TR (refrigeration tons. The L/G ratio of a cooling tower is the ratio of the liquid (water) mass flowrate (L) to gas (air) mass flowrate (G). The specific heat of the air-water vapor mixture and the heat of vaporization are constant. thereby cooling the water from hot temperature to a cold temperature. In a cooling tower operating in counter current flow. there are two basic principles involved for removing heat by the cooling water: 1. 1 TR = 12. The available coefficient is not a constant but varies with operating conditions. known as the driving force diagram. sensible heat transfer due to a difference in temperature levels 2. 4. hw 320 300 280 Air enthalpy. 3. 7. 2. Cooling towers have certain design values.9 kcal/h)]. The NTU corresponding to a set of hypothetical conditions is called the required coefficient and is an evaluation of the problem. This cooling process can best be explained on a psychometric chart. The vapor content of the air is proportional to the partial pressure of the water vapor. latent heat equivalent of the mass transfer resulting from the evaporation of a portion of the circulating water Merkel developed the basic equation based on the above principles. 5. ft3 L = Water mass flowrate. The Merkel model is universally accepted for designing and rating of counterflow cooling towers. The operating characteristic of a cooling tower is developed from an empirical correlation that shows how the available coefficient varies with operating conditions. The drop of water is assumed to be surrounded by a film of saturated air at the water temperature WT with saturation enthalpy hW. heat and water vapor are transferred into the air due (approximately) to the difference in 25 CHEMIcAL ENGINEERING WWW. Number of transfer units (NTU).cHE. As the drop travels downward. kJ/kg 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 25 WBT 30 CWT 35 HWT 45 40 Temperature.cOM FEBRUARY 2012 . the NTU is a numerical value that results from theoretical calculations based on a set of performance characteristics.

The factors that effect the selection of design L/G and consequently the fill height are: cell dimensions. the line shifts to the right increasing the HWT. the KaV/L val26 ues are plotted against varying L/G ratios. Both the cold water temperature (CWT) and hot water temperature (HWT) increases.06 Feature Report the enthalpy of the air at the surface of the water and the main stream of the air. The curvature of the saturation line is such that the approach decreases at a progressively slower rate as the twb increases. The first step in designing a cooling tower is the generation of a demand curve. that is selected by the designer of the cooling tower. twb 4.5 0 0. The next step is to superimpose fill-characteristic curves and demand curves. L 5.04 0.035 0. in combination.045 Performance demand is area under curve 0. namely: 1. 0. Solving the Merkel equation (Equation 2).cOM FEBRUARY 2012 . the KaV/L should remain constant. In this curve. And therefore.055 0. dictate and define the performance of a cooling tower. To maintain equilibrium. CTI’s Technical Paper TP88_05 can be referred to in this regard. Cooling tower design is basically an iterative process. is usually done graphically. and represents the sum of NTUs defined for a cooling tower range. CWT 3.6 0.2 0. G The first four parameters are determined by the user of the cooling tower. the driving force at any point is the vertical distance between the two operating lines. Air mass flowrate. Wet bulb temperature. The intersection of the tower characteristic curve and the design NTU curve gives the design L/G ratio Cooling tower design On the basis of the above discussion. °C 40 45 FIGURE 3.2 L/G 1. water loading. the tower characteristic (KaV/L). G. Hot water temperature. and fan selection.4 1.5 2 Design L/G 1. In both these cases.03 20 25 30 35 Temperature. a change in L/G will change the KaV/L value. Once these five quantities are available. Finally we can summarize the importance of the L/G ratio with the following points. It is the fifth quantity. and approach.0. The L/G is the most important factor in designing the cooling tower and related to the construction and operating cost of cooling tower. A high L/G ratio means: • More water to less air • Air is more saturated — driving force is reduced • More residence time of water needed • Less cooling in given time • Increase in required fan power • Decrease in height of tower • Low evaporation loss (under same water flowrate) An example makes it clear As an example. Water mass flowrate. the performance demanded from the cooling tower is the inverse of this difference. The Cooling Technology Institute has tested a variety of fill configurations and generated fill characteristic curves for each type.cHE. Cold water temperature.5 KaV/L 1 Design NTU 0. let us design a cooling tower with the following data: CHEMIcAL ENGINEERING WWW.8 2 2. However.6 1.8 1 1. HWT 2. An increase in the entering twb moves the air operating line towards the right and upward to establish equilibrium. The increase causes the hot water temperature to increase considerably faster than does the cold water temperature. can be calculated through the Merkel equation. Thus. The solution of the Merkel equation can be represented by the performance demand diagram shown in Figure 3.2 FIGURE 4. air velocities across various cooling tower sections and pressure drops. An increase in the heat load increases the cooling ranges and increases the length of the air operating line. CWT. where the integral is equal to the area under the curve 3 Tower characteristic curve 2. The classical method of thermal rating of cooling towers is to estimate the ratio of liquid to gas first and then find the proper tower volume by the means of trial and error using the tower perfor- mance curve. The KaV/L value is equal to the area under the curve. while the approach decreases.4 0. it is clear that there are five parameters that.05 1/ (hw – hA) 0.

7116 23.750 kJ/kg 4.5843 134. pw kPa 5. This step involves heat load calculations as follows: 1.0365 0. of H2O Vapor.0 1. Approach = (t1 – twb) = 33 – 29 = 4°C 3.1678 140.8480 142.778 0.5 0.098 0. Water Temperature. Barometric pressure (p) at the given altitude (Z) is calculated by using the following equation: (3) For an altitute of 10 m.0306 0.15 315.15 316.6397 21. this becomes p = 101.0467 0. After a number of iterations.15 313.0518 0.7094 193. Here we now use pws: Ws = 0.7863 8. The partial pressure (pws) is again calculated using Equation 4.473 1.753 0. whereby the assumed value of tdb in Step 2 is varied in such a way that h1 = 94.2503 104.0343 5. dry air 3. This results in the value: pws = 4.4740 5. Step III.0436 0.9466 6.8338 111.0 1.15 311.8852 25.5 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ∑NTU 1.75334674 Capacity (F): 3.02515 kg water/kg dry air 2.314 1.9006 150.5 34 34. The specific volume (v) for dry air is calculated using the following equation: (8) v = 0.000 10 = 29. This time T represents the wet bulb temperature in Kelvin.3239 5.096 0.15 314.0549 0.6492 Partial Press.0356 0.0469 0.5 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 K 306.0440 0.6668 97.389 0.8640239 10–2 C4 = 4.5 1. tdb = 32°C 3.3779 kPa 5.098 0.0466 0.1774 5.13 3. Using pws calculated in Step 5 we recalculate twb using the Carrier equation: the calculated twb in Step 6 equals the actual (real) twb.7911 32.0377 0. Calculate the enthalpy of inlet air (h1) using the following equation: (9) (4) (6) which gives the result: twb = 37.7853 5.943.6330 1/(h'– ha) ∆t NTU ∑NTU Cumulative Cooling Range °C 33 33.9987 7.0366 0.5459673 100 and T represents the dry bulb temperature in Kelvin.0 1. W Enthalpy of Film.3239 5.2080 8.4307 21.1764768 10–5 C5 =–1.0412 0.0393 0.6278 5.0457 0.7853 5.1928 174.0470 0. The partial pressure of water (pw) at given relative humidity is found using the following equation: (5) pw = 4. (h'–ha) kJ/kg 21.89511 m3/kg.3298 21.2080 8.2810 6.5 0.0388 0.65 308.097 0.158 0.965 1.7513 147.180 0.0083 kPa 6.5 0.9018 21.193 0.cHE. Calculate the humidity ratio at saturation (Ws) for wet air using same Equation 7.15 307.3348 153. Heat load.5 1 1.4483 21.9466 6. The humidity ratio (W) for dry air is calculated using the following equation: (7) W = 0.0335 0.6278 5.619 1.4023 29.8002206 103 C2 = 1.7°C 7.2958 158.5 0.5 35 35.4444 135.291 0.0008 127.0581 kJ/kg 116.15 kg water/ kg dry air 0.15 310.9987 7.487 0. the calculated tdb value converges to 30.15 312.0343 5.9183 160. t Water Vapor Saturation Pressure.134 0.5420 107.cOM FEBRUARY 2012 .3835 7.585 0. ha Enthalpy Difference.0326 0.193 0.000 m3/h Wet bulb temperature (twb): 29°C Relative humidity () 92% Cooling water inlet (t2): 43°C Cooling water outlet (t1): 33°C Altitude (Z): 10 m Step I. This step involves the calculation of the inlet air enthalpy (h1) as follows: 1.0489 0.5982 122.0 0.2810 6.1774 5.5 2 2.1197 132.3835 7.0 1.15 308.0462 0.098 0.3914993 100 C3 = – 4.2859 21.5686 119. 8.096 0.7863 8.0336 0.145 1.0469 0.4415 27.7371 183. This step involves total psychometric calculations as follows: 1. h' Enthalpy of Air.7585 kPa 4.TABLE 1. Range = (t2 – t1) = 43 – 33 = 10°C 2. which calculates to: pws = 4.9585 101.8999 22.146 0.0 1.0462 0.65 309.6315 6. This step is an iterative process.0419 0.13 F Range = 998.0530 166.187 0.65 307.5018 kg/kJ 0.1348 kJ/kg 94.4173 121.098 0.1255 114.6986 125.12°C.0345 0.3189 21. Q = mCp(t2 – t1) = 998.6315 6.6492 Humidity Ratio.02743 kg water/kg moist air 27 CHEMIcAL ENGINEERING WWW.0 1.900 kcal/h Step II.15 306.0457 0. pws kPa 5. Calculate water vapor saturation pressure (pws) at the assumed tdb for the temperature range of 0 to 200°C using the equation: Where: C1 = –5. Assume a dry bulb temperature of say.170 0.2 kPa 2.4740 5.8718 129.5 0.4452093 10–8 C6 =6.

1016 0.0274 Specific volume.2 kPa InLEt Air PropErtiEs Inlet twb RH Inlet tdb at above RH Humidity ratio (W) Specific volume (v) Density 29 92% 30.66 kPa kPa kPa °C °C °C m3/h °C °C °C Hot water temperature Cold water temperature Range Heat load Barometric pressure (p) 43 33 10 °C °C °C 29943888.0252 0. per cell Specific volume (v) Density Humidity ratio (Ws) at saturation Specific volume (v) at saturation Density KaV/L Constant related to tower design (C) 28 CHEMIcAL ENGINEERING WWW.7533 2.0482 0. dry air kg/m3.87 168. per cell m3/s.0801 162.00 39.5 92% 1. per cell m3/s.cOM FEBRUARY 2012 .0256 94.cHE.1172 °C kg water/kg dry air m3/kg.1170 39. at rain zone Air flowrate at fan 1.0083 29.50 39.522 °C m3/kg.31 0. at tdb Put some value of exit RH (Assuming it is in between 97 and 99%) Partial pressure of water vapor (pw) Humidity ratio (W) at above tdb Enthalpy of exit air Difference Exit twb Water vapor saturation pressure (pws) at exit twb Recalculating twb Difference Dew point temperature (td) of moist air (for temperature between 0 and 93°C) Humidity ratio at saturation (Ws) 0.6668 Air FLow Average density dry Average density wet Air flowrate at fin Air flow at inlet. dry air kg/m3. moist air kg/m3.5702 0.0 28.26 kg/m3 kg/m3 m3/s.50 0. of cells Cell length Cell width Air inlet height Design RH Density of water Altitude 3.12 1.04692 160.0 0. at tdb Partial pressure of water vapor (pw) Water vapor saturation pressure (pws). moist air kJ/kg kg water/kg moist air kJ/kg °C Enthalpy EXit Air PropErtiEs 160. (v) at saturation Density Enthalpy of moist air Humidity Ratio at twb Enthalpy at twb 0.0827 1. TYPICAL THERMAL CALCULATIONS OF COUNTER-FLOW COOLING TOWER Flowrate Wet-bulb temperature Approach Assumed dry-bulb temperature Assumed L/G No.2754 3.0477 0.90 157.9333 4.0470 1.8983 1.55 7.000 10 kg/m3 m m m m Water vapor saturation pressure (pws).9540 1.12 0.31 7.32 kcal/h 101.8951 1.1133 94. moist air kg/m3.9551 1. moist air °C kPa °C kJ/kg °C kPa % kPa kg water/kg dry air kJ/kg Exit air temperature (tdb) Water vapor saturation pressure (pws).5 7.000 29 4 30. dry air kg water/kg moist air m3/kg.575 3 14 14 5. at twb Recalculating twb Difference Dew point temperature (td) of moist air (for temperature between 0 and 93°C) 4.2097 98.24 0.00 39.Feature Report TABLE 2. dry air kg water/kg moist air m3/kg.

5 to –0. Calculate NTU = 4.18 kJ/kg 4.. he is consistently involved in working with and developing Lurgi Fixed-Bed. Calculate the dry and wet specific volume of exit air using Equation 8. and is the starting point of the water operating line.. 3. McGrawHill.” 2nd Edition.575.18 ∆t (Average of incremental increase in inverse of enthalpy difference).Tech.. 5. Take the design L/G ratio and plot the tower characteristic curve by assuming the slope of the line (m). Author Jonny Goyal is an assistant lead engineer at Air Liquide Engineering and Construction. “The Standard Handbook of Plant Engineering. Punjab.5 or 1. saturation pressure and humidity ratio are calculated for the corresponding temperature taken (Table 1). American Soc. Don W.” Chapter 1. recalculate the wet-bulb temperature using Equation 6. Ltd. Or. This step is to help draw the driving force diagram as follows: 1.E. and also assume some value of exit air dry-bulb temperature.0) up to the hot water temperature and calculate the h' and ha. Obviously the height also depends on the type of packing. from SBSCET. Use the same partial pressure and humidity equations as discussed in Step II and Step III. ■ Edited by Gerald Ondrey Reference: 1) “Cooling Tower Thermal Design Manual.com). The curve represents “Design NTU” on the graph. Robert C. v = 0. Calculate the value of the constant C.sharif.5°C increment in temperature.667 kJ/kg This enthalpy specifies Point A on the graph of Figure 2 and is the starting point of the air operating line. as follows: 1. McGrawHill.31°C 7. Take cooling water outlet temperature and calculate the enthalpy of fin (h’) using Equation 9.575. CHEMIcAL ENGINEERING WWW. say 1. At an assumed RH of 98. Ltd. Typical thermal calculations for a counter-flow cooling tower can be seen in Table 2. twb = 39. calculated NTU = 0. Fax: +91-4259-5051: Email: jonny. Take different temperature ranges (covering cooling water inlet and outlet temperature) and calculate the enthalpy of air using Equation 9 and psychometric calculations discussed above.9551 m3/kg. Plot the air saturation curve (enthalpy versus temperature) as shown in Figure 2. which is affilated with PTU Jalandhar. shown in Figure 4.55°C. Goyal has a B. at wet-bulb temperature (Table 1). h’ at 33°C = 116. This step involves the calculation of the exit air properties. which gives all the results of the psychometric chart as well as the cooling tower design. 6. Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. New Delhi 110044 India. for an assumed L/G of 1. “Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook. Similarly. related to cooling tower design using equation: NTU = C (L/G)m C = 2. but along with vendor input we can create a complete economical design of our cooling tower.522 The significance of these calculations is that now we can directly calculate the cooling tower characteristic by using our equations and can compare with the vendor data if the provided height of the cell is adequate to meet the calculated NTU. c/o Lurgi India Co. and calculate h2 for exit air using the following equation: (10) h2 = 160. Take the inverse of enthalpy difference in each incremental step (Table 1).569 kJ/kg This enthalpy specifies Point B on the graph of Figure 2.7533 — this is KaV/L.2 December 1994. 11. Now that the dry-bulb temperature and RH are known values. New York. 1995. 4.Ch. and also has experience in plant operation of distillation columns in the solvent recovery plant of Nectar Lifesciences Ltd. The ending points are shown as C and D in Figure 2 on the water operating and air operating line respectively. to calculate the enthalpy of exit air at these assumed values in Point 2 above. Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate. assume the value of exit air tdb in Point 2 (at same relative humidity) in such a way that the calculated h2 in Point 3 equals the h2 calculated in Point 1. the calculated exit air tdb value converge to 39.cOM FEBRUARY 2012 29 . Further.” 6th Edition.cHE. calculate the NTU for each step and add to get the total NTU for the particular assumed L/G ratio (Table 1). 5. Here the partial pressure. where he is involved in process designing activities related to basic and detailed engineering projects. 4) Psychometric Data from ASAE D271. Total NTU = 1.5% and exit air tdb of 37°C. Prior to joing Lurgi in 2007.89827 m3/kg moist air Step IV. Goyal had two years work experience in Mojj Engineering Pune in the design and commissioning of bioethanol plants from molasses or grains as feedstock. which usually varies between –0.goyal@airliquide.50 kJ/kg 2. 5) “ASHRAE Handbook — Fundamentals. 9. 3) Green.0801 kg/m3 Step V. Ferozepur. 1984. Calculate the specific volume (v) for wet air using Equation 8 with Ws.5. This is again an iterative process. Or for 0.0827 kg/m3 Average density wet = 1. we recalculate h2 = 141. Ga. New York.ir/~heatlab/Lab/Benefit%20Book%20&%20Journal/Benefit%20 book/Cooling%20Tower%20Thermal%20 Design%20Manual. Next. Take incremental change in temperature (say 0. Assume that the exit air has a relative humidity of 97–99% (design RH at the outlet). On the technology and business development front. 2. Mathura Road.9540 m3/kg. others. first we vary the L/G ratio and repeat all calculations discussed above to generate the data for various NTU to plot. Pvt. Now to plot the tower characteristic curve. 7.. Phone: +91-4259-5400. 3. After a number of iterations. ha = 94. Also calculate the density of dry air and wet air (for inlet and exit). The difference between h’ and ha will give you the enthalpy driving force for incremental change in temperature. Assume some value of the L/G ratio. 10. Atlanta.” Daeil Aqua Co. One can also consult with vendors for this value as it also depends on the type of fins used. available as download at: http://che. moist air Average density dry = 1. (A-22/10. of Heating. 6. Dry-Bottom gasification technology and downstream acid-gas removal. dry air v = 0.pdf 2) Rosaler. v = 0. we can develop a calculation sheet in Microsoft Excel. Similarly calculate enthalpy of air ha.8.096 8.

- Parent Stock HandbookUploaded byEko Santoso
- David Odom, Florida Engineering Society Presentation9/24/08Uploaded byLiberty Building Forensics Group
- Plastic Shrinkage Cracks PakUploaded byTaraknath Pal
- 5976Uploaded bynguyen2hoang_4
- Psych Rome TricsUploaded byKarl Attard
- Air Compressor SizingUploaded byalquin08
- infors minitron-e shaking incubatorUploaded byapi-239932254
- Hematra Cooling TowerUploaded byjc Cinco
- Coating Inspection BookUploaded byAlainTrudeau
- Surgery ApplicationUploaded bysam
- Astm d2029 Dew PtUploaded byvlcmstne04
- 2 CT-TheoryUploaded bynabil
- Introduction to HYSYS Plant2.2 bubble dew & Flashes.docUploaded byAnonymous hdXKzBhoN
- DISCUSSION.docxUploaded byshiho miyano
- ECM216 BUILDING SERVICES Bab 2.2.1 Phychrometric ChartUploaded byAzuan Xgunafb Ni Dah
- Traduccion-tuneles en InglesUploaded byGiuliana Puma
- ETPFGM'10-33Uploaded byARUNGREESMA
- Heat Transfer ReviewUploaded byBasem Abd Elaziz
- Cryogenic EX LossUploaded by朱鵬舉
- UAE- Climate Design ConditionsUploaded byAhmed Abo Rashed
- ESE SyllabusUploaded byharjesh1
- Lecture 1 IntroUploaded bySam Wong
- GATE-2013-14 Syllabus Mechanical-ME, Gate Mechanical Syllabus 2013-GATE-CoachingUploaded byLoges Waran
- Storage Tank Heat Loss Calcs - 28.09.2009Uploaded bysiva kumar
- ass_5Uploaded byPuneet Meena
- Past Final Papers 3 hmUploaded byLuqmanhakim Xav
- Double Pipe Heat ExchangerUploaded byIsabel Garcia
- Finite Element Equations for Heat TransferUploaded bytuckfoong
- Heating Coil Sizing for Fuel Oil TankUploaded byAhmed Mujtaba
- NR-310804- Mass Transfer Operations -IUploaded bySrinivasa Rao G

- Jinan Shandong,ChinaUploaded byisosica
- ExpressPCB2.pdfUploaded byisosica
- IHS- August 2011Uploaded byisosica
- Neagu Djuvara - Istoria Romanilor Povestita Tinerilor - 2011 -Uploaded byisosica
- Chlormequat RedUploaded byisosica
- Chemische Fabrik Kalk - CalciumchloridUploaded byisosica
- Express Pcb 2Uploaded byisosica
- Funke Shell Tube He eUploaded byisosica
- Hazard and Operability Study - WikipediaUploaded byisosica
- Dormitor Kim 3Uploaded byisosica
- calciumchlorid-30-technischUploaded byisosica
- Family_eUploaded byisosica
- Strategie Dezvoltare OnestiUploaded byisosica
- Harta Orasului Targu NeamtUploaded byisosica
- ParChem -Hexachloroacetone Supplier DistributorUploaded byisosica
- CO3_2015_LOW_67-71Uploaded byisosica
- CO3_2015_LOW_42-47Uploaded byisosica
- CO3_2015_LOW_53-59Uploaded byisosica
- CO3_2015_LOW_20-27Uploaded byisosica
- London Metal Exchange Prices - Markets Data Center - WSJUploaded byisosica
- Safety in Sulfuric Acid Storage Tanks - Chem. Eng. 11-2015Uploaded byisosica
- Heat exchanger duty.pdfUploaded byisosica
- CO3_2015_LOW_42-47Uploaded byisosica
- Particle size reduction CHE_Facts_1112.pdfUploaded byisosica
- Cooling towers design feb12_CHENG.pdfUploaded byisosica
- Live Gold Price, Silver Price and Spot Precious Metals Quotes and ChartsUploaded byisosica
- Marcare SOD-80 DiodesUploaded byisosica
- CO3_2015_LOW_80-82Uploaded byisosica
- CO3_2015_LOW_67-71Uploaded byisosica
- Valves CHE_Facts_0808.pdfUploaded byisosica