You are on page 1of 5

DB8ROX vs.

MSD 1NC

Roadmap: In this speech I'll give 3 DAs, a kritik, and 2 dispo CPs, and save the more on-case stuff for
the 2NC. Got it? 'kay. Let's go.

DA #1
Link: Many industries depend on the environmental. See next card.

Eco-industry is the key to the global economy


Afgrah Ziurksky (senior fellow at the Zbrekzisysm Insitute), March 2009, “An analytic framework for
global economic collapse”, Zbrekzisysm Institute, http://www.zbrekzisysm.com/article.php?id=12933

“One of the most overlooked and influential industries in the world is the eco-industry, which focuses
on environmental protection. This industry leads the global economy in many ways, staving off nuclear
war being one of the major ones.”

Economic collapse means nuclear war


Afgrah Ziurksky (senior fellow at the Zbrekzisysm Insitute), March 2009, “An analytic framework for
global economic collapse”, Zbrekzisysm Institute, http://www.zbrekzisysm.com/article.php?id=12933

“The ultimate result a global economic collapse would, of course, be nuclear war.”

Impact: Extinction
John Prezwitz (PhD in global politics), 2008, “The True Safeguards of Freedom”, International
Review of Politics 'n Stuff, Vol. 38, No. 5, accessed via a cool academic database you don't have

“The undeniable result of a full-scale nuclear escalation would be the destruction of the biosphere, and,
by extension, all that resides within it – such as humans. Such a massive catastrophe would inevitably
result in complete and total extinction of the human race.”

DA #2
Nuclear bombardment will cause the moon to crash into the earth, leading to nuclear war
Nurman Newbard (senior fellow at the Zbrekzisysm Insitute), January 2008, “Lunar Hazard”,
Zbrekzisysm Institute, http://www.zbrekzisysm.com/article.php?id=12933

“Nuclear bombardment will cause the moon to crash into the earth, leading to nuclear war. Srsly.”

Impact: Extinction
John Prezwitz (PhD in global politics), 2008, “The True Safeguards of Freedom”, International
Review of Politics 'n Stuff, Vol. 38, No. 5, accessed via a cool academic database you don't have

“The undeniable result of a full-scale nuclear escalation would be the destruction of the biosphere, and,
by extension, all that resides within it – such as humans. Such a massive catastrophe would inevitably
result in complete and total extinction of the human race.”

Page 1 of 5
DB8ROX vs. MSD 1NC

DA #3
Nuclear launches fund Brazillian technicians
Mark Kolanio (PhD in everything), October 2009, “The Ultimate Debate Article”, Zbrekzisysm
Institute, http://www.zbrekzisysm.com/article.php?id=13322

“Any nuclear testing or launches in the U.S. automatically transfer funds to Brazil. Approximately 87%
of all nuclear technicians are Brazilian.”

Funding destroys the rainforest in Brazil


Mark Kolanio (PhD in everything), October 2009, “The Ultimate Debate Article”, Zbrekzisysm
Institute, http://www.zbrekzisysm.com/article.php?id=13322

“Inflow of funds to Brazil will result in the destruction of the Brazilian rainforest, clearly an
inadvisable occurrence.”

Japanese government will have to divert funds to rainforest preservation


Japanese Embassy, August 2009, “Funding Priorities Overview”

“According to General Secretary Miong-Shiu, if further deforestation in Brazil were to occur, the
Japanese government promises to divert funds to stop it.”

Lack of government funding leads to the collapse of the Japanese educational system
Japanese Embassy, August 2009, “Funding Priorities Overview”

“The Japanese educational system could be considered to be on the brink of disaster – if any more
funds are removed, it could collapse.”

Japanese students are the key to the world economy


Mark Kolanio (PhD in everything), October 2009, “The Ultimate Debate Article”, Zbrekzisysm
Institute, http://www.zbrekzisysm.com/article.php?id=13322

“It has been clear for decades that Japanese students are what make the world economy run, even more
than smoke, mirrors, and Michael Jackson.”

Economic collapse means nuclear war


Afgrah Ziurksky (senior fellow at the Zbrekzisysm Insitute), March 2009, “An analytic framework for
global economic collapse”, Zbrekzisysm Institute, http://www.zbrekzisysm.com/article.php?id=12933

“The ultimate result a global economic collapse would, of course, be nuclear war.”

Page 2 of 5
DB8ROX vs. MSD 1NC

Impact: Extinction
John Prezwitz (PhD in global politics), 2008, “The True Safeguards of Freedom”, International
Review of Politics 'n Stuff, Vol. 38, No. 5, accessed via a cool academic database you don't have

“The undeniable result of a full-scale nuclear escalation would be the destruction of the biosphere, and,
by extension, all that resides within it – such as humans. Such a massive catastrophe would inevitably
result in complete and total extinction of the human race.”

Wersenheicht Kritik
Framework
Basically, the whole framework here is that kritiks RAWK, so if we win this, you should vote for us. :-)

Link

The Affirmative's assumption that an attempt to achieve a higher state of accuracy is desirable
embodies a flawed view of reality – Irrestitutionalism
Brennen Wersenheicht (PhD in resource philosophy, J. F. Heisenbracht professor of Truth and Other
Random Stuff at Mouthwestern University, Geneva), 1969, “Towards a stuorphic basis for nonreality”,
Dirk & Andrews, ISBN #1283202-392, page 776

“When this paradigm is considered – or at least, rationalized by Being – we can fully understand that
imports of the Irrestitutionalist mind. The technological paradigm embodies and furthers our
technological understanding of being according to which what does not fit in with our current paradigm
-- that is, that which is not yet at our disposal to use efficiently. But the unconcealment itself, within
which ordering unfolds, is never a human handiwork, any more than is the realm through which man is
already passing every time he as a subject relates to an object. Thus, free subjectivity and the
manipulability of entities turn out to be the same in comparison to the necessity of objective ground.”

Impact

The impact is Nuclear War


Brennen Wersenheicht (PhD in resource philosophy, J. F. Heisenbracht professor of Truth and Other
Random Stuff at Mouthwestern University, Geneva), 1969, “Towards a stuorphic basis for nonreality”,
Dirk & Andrews, ISBN #1283202-392, page 877

“It is impossible to conceive of this analysis as anything other than – if it may be said to embody
anything at all – a pure rationalization of the noncreation of being. It may be demonstrated (as, indeed,
has been accomplished through the direct imports of this paradigm) that the eventual result of
nonresistence to the paradigm is the complete annihilation of the human race via nuclear war.”

Page 3 of 5
DB8ROX vs. MSD 1NC

Alternative
The alternative is deontruismorphisticism:

Deontruismorphisticism provides a functional stuorphic model of truthlessness


Brennen Wersenheicht (PhD in resource philosophy, J. F. Heisenbracht professor of Truth and Other
Random Stuff at Mouthwestern University, Geneva), 1969, “Towards a stuorphic basis for nonreality”,
Dirk & Andrews, ISBN #1283202-392, page 928

“It is impossible to deny that in its modern form, deontruismorphisticism is considered, among the
myriad scholars of truthlessness, to constitute a true model of the inconstructionist philosophy as first
derived; it is rather as if in a unique suspension of temporality, in the short circuit between the present
and the future, we are – as if by Grace – briefly allowed to act as if the utopian future is (not yet fully
here, but) already at hand, there to be seized. It becomes clear that an ecological revision or correction
of this theory, contrary to what is often argued, is not necessary, at least in its specific historical
context. It is in this mode of being that we can finally recognize the truth of objectivity.”

Deontruismorphisticism recognizes that, fundamentally, every question comes down to the same thing:

Page 4 of 5
DB8ROX vs. MSD 1NC

Counterplan 1
I'm running this counterplan dispo. It'll be automatically kicked under any of the following
circumstances:

1. It gets permed.
2. Either side accepts parametrics.

Text: The Aff plan will be adopted, with the following extra mandates:
1. Eco-industries will get government subsidies to keep them alive.
2. All the nukes will be shot at a specific spot on the moon that won't trigger DA 2.
3. All Brazilian nuclear missile silo technicians will be fired.

Justification: We avoid all our DAs and the K, while getting all the Aff advantages.

Counterplan 2
I'm also running this counterplan dispo. It'll be automatically considered kicked if CP 1 does NOT get
kicked. Get it? Good.

Text: Environmental policy will be officially redefined as “policy pertaining to walruses”. This makes
the Aff nontopical. Cue topicality impacts and voters: Education! Fairness! Time skew! Topic
explosion! Two Neg teams! Prima facie burden! Burden of epicness!

Justification: Why not!?

Vote Neg. Or larrythecucumber will put a picture in his signature. I'm warning you. Vote Neg.

Page 5 of 5