buckling

© All Rights Reserved

8 views

buckling

© All Rights Reserved

- Buckling
- Unit 15
- Design Parameters in STAAD
- Design Aid Composite Column
- Exp 4 - Strut-Buckling (Revised July 2010)
- Design of Column in Limit State Method
- Buckling
- Concepts of Linear is Ed Buckling and Column Loading Analysis
- Chapter 4 Columns, Frames and Walls
- Building Construction Project 1
- Compression Member Design (3).PDF
- Lecture 7
- Built Up Columns
- Design of Columns
- 3341r_92.pdf
- SBE SS6 Secure
- Chapter 20
- RCC 13 Column
- Exp 5
- Introduction to Plate Bucklin

You are on page 1of 10

Theoretically, buckling is caused by abifurcation in the solution to the equations of static equilibrium. At a certain stage under an increasing load, further load is able to be sustained in one of two states of equilibrium: an undeformed state or a laterally-deformed state. In practice, buckling is characterized by a sudden failure of a structural member subjected to high compressive stress, where the actual compressive stress at the point of failure is less than the ultimate compressive stresses that the material is capable of withstanding. Mathematical analysis of buckling often makes use of an axial load eccentricity that introduces a secondary bending moment, which is not a part of the primary applied forces to which the member is subjected. As an applied load is increased on a member, such as column, it will ultimately become large enough to cause the member to become unstable and is said to have buckled. Further load will cause significant and somewhat unpredictable deformations, possibly leading to complete loss of the member's loadcarrying capacity. If the deformations that follow buckling are not catastrophic the member will continue to carry the load that caused it to buckle. If the buckled member is part of a larger assemblage of components such as a building, any load applied to the structure beyond that which caused the member to buckle will be redistributed within the structure.

Contents [hide] 1 Columns o 1.1 Self-buckling

2 Buckling under tensile dead loading 3 Constraints, curvature and multiple buckling 4 Flutter instability 5 Various forms of buckling 6 Bicycle wheels 7 Surface materials 8 Cause 9 Accidents 10 Energy method 11 Flexural-torsional buckling 12 Lateral-torsional buckling o 12.1 The modification factor (Cb)

15 Buckling of thin cylindrical shells subject to axial loads 16 Buckling of pipes and pressure vessels subject to external overpressure 17 See also 18 References 19 External links

Columns[edit]

A column under a concentric axial load exhibiting the characteristic deformation of buckling

The eccentricity of the axial force results in a bending moment acting on the beam element.

The ratio of the effective length of a column to the least radius of gyration of its cross section is called the slenderness ratio (sometimes expressed with the Greek letter lambda, ). This ratio affords a means of classifying columns. Slenderness ratio is important for design considerations. All the following are approximate values used for convenience.

A short steel column is one whose slenderness ratio does not exceed 50; an intermediate length steel column has a slenderness ratio ranging from about 50 to 200, and are dominated by the strength limit of the material, while a long steel column may be assumed to have a slenderness ratio greater than 200 and its behavior is dominated by the modulus of elasticity of the material.

A short concrete column is one having a ratio of unsupported length to least dimension of the cross section equal to or less than 10. If the ratio is greater than 10, it is considered a long column (sometimes referred to as a slender column).

Timber columns may be classified as short columns if the ratio of the length to least dimension of the cross section is equal to or less than 10. The dividing line between intermediate and long timber columns cannot be readily evaluated. One way of defining the lower limit of long timber columns would be to set it as the smallest value of the ratio of length to least cross sectional area that would just exceed a certain constant K of the material. Since K depends on the modulus of elasticity and the allowable compressive stress parallel to the grain, it can be seen that this arbitrary limit would vary with the species of the timber. The value of K is given in most structural handbooks.

If the load on a column is applied through the center of gravity (centroid) of its cross section, it is called an axial load. A load at any other point in the cross section is known as an eccentric load. A short column under the action of an axial load will fail by direct compression before it buckles, but a long column loaded in the same manner will fail by buckling (bending), the buckling effect being so large that the effect of the axial load may be neglected. The intermediate-length column will fail by a combination of direct compressive stress and bending. In 1757, mathematician Leonhard Euler derived a formula that gives the maximum axial load that a long, slender, ideal column can carry without buckling. An ideal column is one that is perfectly straight, homogeneous, and free from initial stress. The maximum load, sometimes called the critical load, causes the column to be in a state of unstable equilibrium; that is, the introduction of the slightest lateral force will cause the column to fail by buckling. The formula derived by Euler for columns with no consideration for lateral forces is given below. However, if lateral forces are taken into consideration the value of critical load remains approximately the same.

where = maximum or critical force (vertical load on column), = modulus of elasticity, = area moment of inertia, = unsupported length of column, = column effective length factor, whose value depends on the conditions of end support of the column, as follows. For both ends pinned (hinged, free to rotate), = 1.0.

For one end fixed and the other end free to move laterally, is the effective length of the column.

Examination of this formula reveals the following interesting facts with regard to the load-bearing ability of slender columns. 1. Elasticity and not the compressive strength of the materials of the column determines the critical load. 2. The critical load is directly proportional to the second moment of area of the cross section. 3. The boundary conditions have a considerable effect on the critical load of slender columns. The boundary conditions determine the mode of bending and the distance between inflection points on the deflected column. The inflection points in the deflection shape of the column are the points at which the curvature of the column change sign and are also the points at which the internal bending moments are zero. The closer together the inflection points are, the higher the resulting capacity of the column.

A demonstration model illustrating the different "Euler" buckling modes. The model shows how the boundary conditions affect the critical load of a slender column. Notice that each of the columns are identical, apart from the boundary conditions.

The strength of a column may therefore be increased by distributing the material so as to increase the moment of inertia. This can be done without increasing the weight of the column by distributing the material as far from the principal axis of the cross section as possible, while

keeping the material thick enough to prevent local buckling. This bears out the well-known fact that a tubular section is much more efficient than a solid section for column service. Another bit of information that may be gleaned from this equation is the effect of length on critical load. For a given size column, doubling the unsupported length quarters the allowable load. The restraint offered by the end connections of a column also affects the critical load. If the connections are perfectly rigid, the critical load will be four times that for a similar column where there is no resistance to rotation (in which case the column is idealized as having hinges at the ends). Since the radius of gyration is defined as the square root of the ratio of the column's cross section to its area, the above formula may be rearranged as follows. Using the Euler formula for hinged ends, and substituting Ar2 for I, the following formula results.

where

is the

slenderness ratio. Since structural columns are commonly of intermediate length, and it is impossible to obtain an ideal column, the Euler formula on its own has little practical application for ordinary design. Issues that cause deviation from the pure Euler column behaviour include imperfections in geometry in combination with plasticity/non-linear stress strain behaviour of the column's material. Consequently, a number of empirical column formulae have been developed to agree with test data, all of which embody the slenderness ratio. For design, appropriate safety factors are introduced into these formulae. One such formula is the Perry Robertson formula which estimates the critical buckling load based on an initial (small) curvature. The Rankine Gordon formula (Named for William John Macquorn Rankine and Perry Hugesworth Gordon (1899 1966)) is also based on experimental results and suggests that a column will buckle at a load Fmax given by:

where Fe is the Euler maximum load and Fc is the maximum compressive load. This formula typically produces a conservative estimate of Fmax.

Self-buckling[edit]

A free-standing, vertical column, with density , Young's modulus , and radius , will buckle under its own weight if its height exceeds a certain critical height:[1][2][3]

where g is the acceleration due to gravity, I is the second moment of area of the beam cross section, and B is the first zero of the Bessel function of the first kind of order 1/3, which is equal to 1.86635086...

Fig. 2: Elastic beam system showing buckling under tensile dead loading.

Usually buckling and instability are associated to compression, but recently Zaccaria, Bigoni, Noselli and Misseroni (2011)[4] have shown that buckling and instability can also occur in elastic structures subject to dead tensile load. An example of a single-degree-of-freedom structure is shown in Fig. 1, where the critical load is also indicated. Another example involving flexure of a structure made up of beam elements governed by the equation of the Euler's elastica is shown in Fig.2. In both cases, there are no elements subject to compression. The instability and buckling in tension are related to the presence of the slider,

the junction between the two rods, allowing only relative sliding between the connected pieces.

Fig. 3: A one-degree-of-freedom structure exhibiting a tensile (compressive) buckling load as related to the fact that the right end has to move along the circular profile labeled 'Ct' (labelled 'Cc').

Buckling of an elastic structure strongly depends on the curvature of the constraints against which the ends of the structure are prescribed to move (see Bigoni, Misseroni, Noselli and Zaccaria, 2012[5]). In fact, even a singledegree-of-freedom system (see Fig.3) may exhibit a tensile (or a compressive) buckling load as related to the fact that one end has to move along the circular profile labeled 'Ct' (labelled 'Cc').

Fig. 4: A one-degree-of-freedom structure with a 'S'-shaped bicircular profile exhibiting multiple bifurcations (both tensile and compressive).

The two circular profiles can be arranged in a 'S'-shaped profile, as shown in Fig.4; in that case a discontinuity of the constraint's curvature is introduced, leading to multiple bifurcations. Note that the single-degree-of-freedom structure shown in Fig.4 has two buckling loads (one tensile and one compressive). Watch a movie for more details.

Flutter instability[edit]

Structures subject to a follower (nonconservative) load may suffer instabilities which are not of the buckling type and therefore are not detectable with a static approach.[6] For instance, the so-called 'Ziegler column' is shown in Fig.5.

Fig. 5: A sketch of the 'Ziegler column', a two-degree-of-freedom system subject to a follower load (the force P remains always parallel to the rod BC), exhibiting flutter and divergence instability. The two rods, of linear mass density , are rigid and connected through two rotational springs of stiffness k1 and k2.

This two-degree-of-freedom system does not display a quasi-static buckling, but becomes dynamically unstable. To see this, we note that the equations of motion are

) and

where

and

Fig. 6: A sequence of deformed shapes at consecutive times intervals of the structure sketched in Fig.5 and exhibiting flutter (upper part) and divergence (lower part) instability.

Flutter instability corresponds to a vibrational motion of increasing amplitude and is shown in Fig.6 (upper part) together with the divergence instability (lower part) consisting in an exponential growth. Recently, Bigoni and Noselli (2011)[7] have experimentally shown that flutter and divergence instabilities can be directly related to dry friction, watch the movie for more details.

Buckling is a state which defines a point where an equilibrium configuration becomes unstable under a parametric change of load and can manifest itself in several different phenomena. All can be classified as forms of bifurcation.

There are four basic forms of bifurcation associated with loss of structural stability or buckling in the case of structures with a single degree of freedom. These comprise two types of pitchfork bifurcation, one saddle-node bifurcation (often referred to as a limit point) and onetranscritical bifurcation. The pitchfork bifurcations are the most commonly studied forms and include the buckling of columns and struts, sometimes known as Euler buckling; the buckling of plates, sometimes known as local buckling, which is well known to be relatively safe (both are supercritical phenomena) and the buckling of shells, which is well-known to be a highly dangerous (subcritical phenomenon).[8]Using the concept of potential energy, equilibrium is defined as a stationary point with respect to the degree(s) of freedom of the structure. We can then determine whether the equilibrium is stable, if the stationary point is a local minimum; or unstable, if it is a maximum, point of inflection or saddle point (for multiple-degree-of-freedom structures only) see animations below.

- BucklingUploaded byVinit Ahluwalia
- Unit 15Uploaded byBiplab Sadhukhan
- Design Parameters in STAADUploaded byHussain Mir
- Design Aid Composite ColumnUploaded byHazal Fidanboy
- Exp 4 - Strut-Buckling (Revised July 2010)Uploaded byDarker Sora
- Design of Column in Limit State MethodUploaded byRicardo Bermudez
- BucklingUploaded byAbdul Rahman
- Concepts of Linear is Ed Buckling and Column Loading AnalysisUploaded bysreejit77
- Chapter 4 Columns, Frames and WallsUploaded bysijuwolaoluranti
- Building Construction Project 1Uploaded byCynthia Lee
- Compression Member Design (3).PDFUploaded byAbrar Afzal
- Lecture 7Uploaded byawterni
- Built Up ColumnsUploaded bySuneesh P
- Design of ColumnsUploaded byVenkatesh Gangadhar
- 3341r_92.pdfUploaded byJM Viray
- SBE SS6 SecureUploaded byilovevina
- Chapter 20Uploaded bySuman Karthik
- RCC 13 ColumnUploaded byEngr Swapan
- Exp 5Uploaded bySaleem Siddiqui
- Introduction to Plate BucklinUploaded byAndré Ferreira
- Design of compression members-3Uploaded byeseem
- 1.slender - .docxUploaded byAmbrish
- LAME Buckling ChecksUploaded byBen Clack
- chp%3A10.1007%2F978-94-009-3455-9_1.pdfUploaded byhoudiefa
- Colum n StrutUploaded byAjit Bole
- StrutsUploaded byAjit Bole
- Design of Columns-LESSON 10Uploaded byAnand.5
- C CodesStand Schneider Jan11Uploaded byMagdy Bakry
- Circular CFT 2.pdfUploaded byRoberto Andrés Fernández Domínguez
- Analysis of Cft, Rcc and Steel BuildingUploaded byAkilesh Ramesh

- Quantum MechanicsUploaded byaditya2053
- Checklist SM_MM NepaliUploaded byaditya2053
- Checklist BM_CM NepaliUploaded byaditya2053
- UEIP-pcrUploaded byaditya2053
- MechanicsUploaded byaditya2053
- MoleculesUploaded byaditya2053
- TorsionUploaded byaditya2053
- Retrogade MotionUploaded byaditya2053
- Bose EinsteinUploaded byaditya2053
- Cauchy Stress TensorUploaded byaditya2053
- von misesUploaded byaditya2053
- Manual 11 Design of Arch BridgesUploaded byaditya2053
- Ductile MaterialsUploaded byaditya2053
- Kinetic EnergyUploaded byaditya2053
- plastisizerUploaded byaditya2053
- Ministries of GoNUploaded byaditya2053
- Elasticity in PhysicsUploaded byaditya2053
- Response SpectrumUploaded byaditya2053
- Earthen BuildingsUploaded byaditya2053
- Gibbs Thomson EquationUploaded byaditya2053
- Surface TensionUploaded byaditya2053
- Properties of WaterUploaded byaditya2053
- Structural MechanicsUploaded byaditya2053
- Slope Stability AnalysisUploaded byaditya2053
- Retaining WallsUploaded byaditya2053
- Rational FunctionsUploaded byaditya2053
- Elasticity of a FunctionUploaded byaditya2053
- Elasticity in EconomicsUploaded byaditya2053
- Structural Integrity and FailureUploaded byaditya2053

- 2004 Polymer Processing With Supercritical FluidsUploaded bycesc321
- Seismic Design Considerations for Pile Foundation EmgineeringUploaded bytaosye
- Solvay R134aUploaded byPaweł Hejmowski
- Review Problems.pdfUploaded byArman Malekloo
- Karakterisasi Material.pdfUploaded bymiftakhur
- (36-8-1) NPTEL - Vacuum TechnologyUploaded byCryogenics_NPTEL
- JAP121,2017,043907Uploaded byNeeraj Panwar
- A Robust Anisotropic Hyperelastic Formulation for the Modelling of Soft TissueUploaded byManuel
- Numerical Simulation of Friction Stir Butt Welding Processes for Az91 Magnesium AlloyUploaded byesatjournals
- ScienceUploaded byPravin Shinde
- Kevlar composite jurnalUploaded byJakbrother 28
- IntroUploaded byFranz Loui Rosario
- FinalUploaded byMohamed IBrahim
- MAE 101 # 1 LabReportUploaded byLarisaVlad
- Chapter 13Uploaded byChris Smith
- design of deep by by tedds softwareUploaded byParthi Ban
- Reservoir DeliverabilityUploaded byAjay Suri
- Circulation in Blowdown FlowUploaded byMuhammad Saquib
- Ravikumar Gaurav (Events Details)Uploaded byMATHANKUMAR.S
- langord_louerzUploaded byPalash Swarnakar
- ANL Preliminary Matls Selection for Next Gen Nuclear Plant Reactor PVUploaded byClaudia Mms
- Heat Loss From a Buried Oil PipeUploaded byJuan Pablo Apaza
- Thesis-1984-Austin.pdfUploaded byZain Al Abidin
- epojetUploaded bydraganug
- PNS49[1]Uploaded byjbcast86
- isentropic process.pdfUploaded byJeebee Logroño Alo
- 125321213 Pipeline Buckling OMAEBucklingUploaded byYualita Kartikasari
- Mechanical Engineering Sample PapersUploaded byrajesh0145
- Buckling Analysis of a Laminate Plate Copy1Uploaded byசெல்வ குமார்
- Discussion- Strengthening of Existing Composite Beams Using LRFD ProceduresUploaded byCaesar JJ