This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

ENGINEERING NOTES

1549

of momentum and pressure thrust effects, respectively. Similar effects on performance as shown in Fig. 3 were found5 for various 7*3 from 1.1 to 1.4; aopt is not strongly affected by 7 for the ranges of variations typical of most propellant systems of interest. Decreasing p** causes a slight decrease in aopt and a slight increase in CF. To determine the validity of the one-dimensional source flow model employed in this analysis, several conical nozzles were analyzed with a two-dimensional method-of-characteristics computer program. Results were in very good agreement with those of Migdal and Landis8; the differences between CVs generally were <0.25%.

Appendix: Example of the Effects of Friction

out friction, thus decreasing the difference between them. By applying these displacement thicknesses to the friction «0pt, it was found that the corrected friction aopt now slightly exceeds the frictionless aopt for the shorter L and that the corrected friction aopt lies halfway between the friction and frictionless aopt's shown in Fig. 4 at the longer L. These results justify ignoring the boundary-layer effects for the purpose of estimating nozzle geometry in a preliminary analysis of a propulsion system.

References

Downloaded by BEIHANG UNIVERSITY (CNPIEC Xi'an Branch) on April 17, 2014 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/3.29128

As stated in the analysis, the effects of friction on the optimum cone angle can be ignored for the purpose of estimating nozzle geometry in a preliminary analysis of a propulsion system. However, the effect of friction on CF is very significant and should not be ignored. To illustrate this point, the drag loss was added to the thrust equation in an approximate manner, and the necessary condition for maximum thrust was re-examined. The thrust equation including frictional effects is given by F = \[mVs + As(ps — PQ)] — rASUT cosa

2

(Al)

r = r(r) = ifpT (A2) where r is an average value of the shear stress based on r between the throat and the exit. For the purpose of this example, which is to determine what effect friction can have on a0pt and CF, f is assumed to be constant and equal to 0.0005. This choice of / was made to correlate with the ACp normally caused by friction and not from an experimental correlation of skin-friction data. Defining a CF from Eq. (Al) and setting dCp/da = 0 yields the following criterion for maximum thrust: 2f/Pc s na r — r0 = X (1 + Gosa)(d€g/da) (1 + cosa) (deg/da) 2esur cosa dr dr — esursina] ST3T (1 + cosa) Pc dr der (A3) The results obtained by using Eq. (A3) instead of Eq. (8) are shown in Fig. 4. Curves "D" and "E" show that by including friction in the design equation, a slight shift in a0pt results. The difference in aopt calculated with and without friction increases with I/*, reaching values of the order of one degree at extreme L*. From Fig. 4, it is also seen that the frictional losses are indeed significant (the differences between curve "A" and curves "B" and "C," 1.63% @ L* = 26), and that there is actually a maximum value of Cp(L*) (curves "B" and "C")« This CV max corresponds to the ojopt and L* determined by Fraser et al.4 but for the constant length constraint. It is not until L* becomes very large, and slightly before CF max, that a slight increase in CF (the difference between curves "B" and "C", 0.057% @ L* = 26) is detected by designing a conical nozzle with friction included in the design equation (curve "B") as compared with just simply subtracting the drag loss from the thrust of the nozzle designed without friction in the design equation (curve "C"). The displacement thickness of the boundary layer can vary from negative values for a highly cooled wall to rather large positive values for an adiabatic wall. The boundary-layer displacement thickness for several optimum conical nozzles with a nearly adiabatic wall (Te = 6000°R, Tw = 5700°R) was calculated by the authors using the boundary-layer computer program developed by Elliott, Bartz, and Silver.9 The growth of the displacement thickness for nozzles with L's of 9, 15.5, and 26 in. between the throat (yt = 1.0 in.) and the exit was found to be 0.05, 0.091, and 0.143 in., respectively. These values of the displacement thickness shift the aopt obtained including friction towards the aopt obtained with-

Barrere, M., Jaumotte, A., Fraeijs de Veubeke, B., and Vandenkerckhove, J., Rocket Propulsion (Elsevier Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1960), p. 90. 2 Rao, G. V. R., "Recent developments in rocket nozzle configurations," ARS J. 31, 1488-1494 (1961). 3 Ahlberg, J. H., Hamilton, S., Migdal, D., and Nilson, E. N., "Truncated perfect nozzles in optimum nozzle design," ARS J. 31,614-620(1961). 4 Fraser, R. P., Rowe, P. N., and Coulter, M. O., "Efficiency of supersonic nozzles for rockets and some unusual designs," Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs. (London) 171, 553-580(1957). 5 Scofield, M. P., and Hoffman, J. D., "An analysis of optimized conical thrust nozzles," Jet Propulsion Center, Purdue Univ., TM-66-6 (July 1966). 6 Malina, F. J., "Characteristics of the rocket motor unit based on the theory of perfect gases," J. Franklin Inst. 230, 433-454(1940). 7 Landsbaum, E. M., "Thrust of a conical nozzle," ARS J. 29, 212-213(1959). 8 Migdal, D. and Landis, F., "Characteristics of conical supersonic nozzles," ARS J. 32, 1898-1901 (1962). 9 Elliott, D. G., Bartz, D. R., and Silver, S., "Calculation of turbulent boundary-layer growth and heat transfer in axisymmetric nozzles," Jet Propulsion Lab., California Institute of Technology, Rept. 32-387 (February 1963).

1

**Internal Ballistics of the Solid-Propellant Rocket Motor
**

V. K. SRIVASTAVA* Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India

Nomenclature = burning-rate constant (r = apn) C = mass of solid propellant = D = initial web size = / — fraction of the web size remaining unburnt at time t = semiempirical factor9 A; = NC = gas mass present in the chamber n = pressure index P = chamber pressure Q = rate at which gas escapes rate of burning R = gas constant S = burning surface area of a charge t = time T = chamber temperature U = empty chamber volume W = weight of the rocket z = fraction of the charge mass burnt up to time t e = form factor [Eq. (3)] 7 = ratio of the specific heats propellant density 5 in the chamber P = gas density covolume9

a1

7 1/2 [2/(7

Received August 30, 1966; revision received July 10, 1967. The author thanks J. N. Kapur for his help and guidance, and the Director R&D Organization, Directorate of Research (Laboratories), New Delhi, for financial support. [4.24] * Department of Mathematics.

and 5 implies that CZ/5 — CNrj is neglected.20f)p» . (11) becomes [\p» - [\np-~1 .aiaa.rSop/CX1/2) (4) (16) Let J70 = U . (1. (10) twice. differential equation.e.CNvj] = CN\ (10) Differentiating Eq.rSop/CX1/2 Again from Eqs. the equations can be solved analytically for every value of n. (2) and (9). since the space mean pressure distribution is p/[l + (kCN/6W) ]. 3) constant chamber temperature (isothermal model). however.org | DOI: 10. In rockets the pressure distribution is approximately parabolic and is important when discussing "regression" and "erosive" burning.Z) . 3.\t . which is a correction to the Von Karman and Malina equation. and 5) change of volume available to the gases in the rocket motor due to the burning of the propellant is neglected. An exact solution has been obtained for n = 0.ts)/(DU) To find the web thickness.e. Differentiating Eq. pressure drop is neglected. and using Eqs. we establish p(t) in the form of a second-order. The equations are p[U . Eqs. The system of equations which we have considered is deduced from those of the RCL gun.Z) . when only the first four of the foregoing assumptions are made. SPACECRAFT VOL. 4.Function) p[U . 3. and 9). If 6 = 0. Assumption 1 implies that 6 = 0 (i. respectively Subscripts N =z Pressure-Time Relation— I (8) 0 B = conditions at t = 0 = at all burnt Introduction From Eqs. (2) and (8). The transient exhaust curve is given by Eq.(C/S) (I . but is solved for quadratic form-function only. Particular cases 1) 77 = 0 and 2) 77 = 1/5 have been discussed. we get N = Z .CNrj] = CN\ Z = 1.(C/S)(I . Eqs.CNy] = NCRT[l + (kCN/QW)] (1) Rate of burning equation: r = -Df = apn Form-function: (2) Here we consider the assumptions 2-5. 4 implies that 77 is taken as zero. (93) of Kapur10 : . tubular charge). (11-13) can be integrated to give p ( t ) .2514/3. Kapur4>5 used the basic equations of internal ballistics [for the general linear law of burning as derived from recoilless (RCL) guns6 for the nonisothermal model to determine p(t). we have N = -f . and B = C\a/DU0'. we integrate Eq. Pressure-Time Relation1—II (General Form.. K p(U . and 4) reduced to p/B = pn .(n + 2)p«/5]p* (12) A better approximation is. 3.(Cf/S) . Assumption 3 implies that T is taken as constant. (7) and (9). we get (9) Downloaded by BEIHANG UNIVERSITY (CNPIEC Xi'an Branch) on April 17.1550 J. we get [(77 - l)pn or [(77 - [(77 .*p If 0 = 0. At 77 = 0. then (17) Because of assumption 3. (2. then d(NT)/dt = T<>Z - (5) p/B = -(-I + 0 . but instead of constant burning surface.7 Srivastava8 has also established p(t) for the pressure index law of burning for a nonisothermal model. Gupta and Mehta3 also obtained p(t) when the change in volume is taken into account. (2.$P The solution of this equation is (18) p[U . and 9). (11) becomes [\p» * (13) Each of Eqs. Price2 obtained the pressure-time curve p(t) in terms of charge and motor shape parameters. we consider the charge with quadratic form-function. including assumptions 1-3. Here.((7/6). Eq.C/S)p = C\(Zf . Hence. 11 \ = RT at constant T ( ' ) . The law of burning is the pressure index (r = apn). In the present note. ThenEq. (15) and using Eqs.6 Another case is discussed which includes all of the assumptions made by Kershner. (2) : (14) Basic Equations The general equations for internal ballistics are Equation of state: The integration will depend on the p(t) we use. and assumption 2 implies that 1 + (kCN/QW) is unity. obtained by putting 77^ = 1.. 2014 | http://arc./ (6) (7) pi-n = ^-i + Ae~*Bt (19) . nonlinear differential equation for this system.5. (4) and (5) become identical.(C/S)] = CN\ (15) Z = (1 -/)(! + Of) Rate of nozzle flow: (3) and Eqs. 2) uniform chamber pressure at any instant.TSQp/C(RT)» Energy equation10: 2 (U .29128 ERSHNER1 developed the theory of the internal ballistics of a solid-propellant rocket under the following assumptions: 1) constant burning surface. nonlinear. NO.1/5) (n p2 (11) Equation (11) is the basic second-order.log{(X + 77?)/(X + rjpB)}] + 1/(X + npB)} = -bCT(t . however. 4) covolume 77 per unit mass is zero. ( " ) = d( )/<ft and dz( )/dt2. i.

/ = /0.time relation. National Defense Research Committee.O = Reynolds numbers based on undisturbed conditions at outer edge of boundary layer and axial distance from either leading edge to flare junction or from leading edge to point ahead of pressure rise. 5 Kapur. Natl. Newton/m2 Rm = unit freestream Reynolds number. and Mehta. however. Kuehn1 has obtained data with turbulent boundary-layer separation induced by flares on cylinders at a.5 for all charges shapes and for 6 for all values of n. 1950). The conditions for the integration of Eq. K. 1967 (no paper number.^po (23) At n = 0. Sec.. Pt. The present paper provides additional information on maximum flare angles for attached flow and pressures in turbulent separated regions on nose-cylinder-flare bodies at M„ = 6 and at Rm/cm from 0. and they provide a natural fairing between various stages of launch configurations." Proc. 3. cm a = angle of attack. (21) transforms to y/(l . "Rocket fundamentals.time relation by simply substituting the data for actual rockets. we get Let Y = pl~n. Va. J." University of Delhi. Office of Scientific Research and Development Kept. whereas Eqs. Equations (11-13) can be integrated numerically for the parameters of the propellant used in the rocket.2514/3. V The maximum flare angles for attached flow at a = 0° as a function of local surface Mach number are presented in Fig. t = 0. References Kershner. (23) becomes F + %B$Y + daBY/D = 0 or y = Cie[ (24) = first peak or plateau pressure coefficient for turbulent or laminar flow. Mo = Mach number at freestream and undisturbed conditions ahead of pressure rise at outer edge of boundary layer.. Natl.org | DOI: 10. Sec. Rewriting Eq. Sci. nonlinear differential equation and is solvable for n = 0. Inst. from Eq. K. GOLDBERG* NASA Langley Research Center... While separation is affected by many parameters. revision received August 10. J. the pressures on the flares reached the inviscid conical-flow values except for those with large separation. Sci. A: 20." Proc." U. 1 LARED afterbodies can provide stability at high Mach numbers without markedly increasing the weight of a body.aiaa. H. Guns." Proc. respectively.L... 10 Kapur. Ill (1944). 9 Corner. Inst. Dept. respectively PI. However. India. . Therefore.14. 3711. V. Applied Fluid Mechanics Section.2 An example of the surface pressure distributions obtained at a = 0° with a 15° conical nose-cylinder configuration with various conical flare angles is presented in Fig. "Pressure-temperature curve for the ideal solid propellant rocket motor II. p = po p«-o = - . J." Mem.. N.1967. 150 (1957a). 1.e. 7 Von Karmdn. The most significant result is that exact solutions are possible for n = 0. It should be noted that the pressure rise measured in a separation region is not necessarily that which will cause separation. Inst. 653 (1954). F. 94-106. Natl. S. Therefore. (17). W.11. Chap. limited data obtained by Kuehn1 indicate Presented at AIAA Sounding Rocket Vehicle Technology Specialist Conference.33 X 106. hence A = pQl~n — \l/~l} and Eq. positive toward rear. Delhi.O. 2 Price. (19) becomes Turbulent Separation Associated with Axisymmetric Flared Bodies THEODORE J. Sci. Natl. IV. 2014 | http://arc.& = pressure. N. Von Kdrmdn (Butterworths Scientific Publications Ltd. I = diameter and length of cylinder midbody section. To calculate these characteristics it is required that the flow on and ahead of the flare surface be analyzed in terms of local conditions. pp. it is necessary to have information on separation phenomena as a function of local Mach number and flare angle. London. cm Moo. J. 1956). the maximum flare angles for attached flow determined from these data appear applicable to longer length flares. 541 (1957b). and. of Defense.. The initial conditions of integration are t = 0. N. K. 541 (1962). New York. and Malina. A: 28.. Conclusion Equations (11-13. published in bound volume of papers of the conference). Aero-Physics Division. (19).0 + 20/ Differentiating.S. 6 Kapur. 2.. Eq. J. / = /0. (20) and (24) give the pressure. " Variation of pressure with time in rocket motion. data available on hypersonic turbulent boundary-layer separation are limited. However. Sec. Hampton. Va. India." Proc.5. deg CP. = 0° from Mach numbers of 1. Div. Sec. India (1958).. "Pressure-temperature curve for the ideal solid-propellant rocket motor. N. 8 Srivastava. T. 16 (1954). Vol. Some data were obtained at angles of attack up to 12°. Collected Works of T. Art. J. Williamsburg. predictions of aerodynamic characteristics of such bodies are not routinely successful. Sec. (22) are p = p0. p = p0. India. 3 Gupta.19 to 0. Nomenclature which is the solution of the differential equation (18)." Jet Propulsion 24. A: 23. India.5.C.n) + $BY + 20aBY»'l-*/D = 0 Downloaded by BEIHANG UNIVERSITY (CNPIEC Xi'an Branch) on April 17. and 24) give the required p(t) for an ideal solid-propellant rocket motor. 923-928 (1966). p/Bpn + \l/pl'n = 1 . RX.5 to 4. France 4. 1967. "Pressure-time curve in internal ballistics of solid fuel rockets as deduced from the theory of internal ballistics of RCL gun. "Charge geometry and ballistic parameters for solid propellant rocket motors. local and freestream stagnation.5. cm"1 RL.. "Thesis on internal ballistics of guns and rockets for single composite and moderated charges.NOVEMBER 1967 ENGINEERING NOTES 1551 where A is the constant of integration.. the criterion used to detect the presence of separation in this investigation was the first appearance of a "hump" in the longitudinal pressure distributions as used by Kuehn. A. A: 23. Inst. 4 Kapur. [11.p F which gives the desired pressure.29128 (22) Equation (22) is a second-order. then Eq. F = 0. one of the important parameters in flare stabilization studies is the maximum flare angle through which the flow can turn without separating. submitted March 9. "Internal ballistics of R. In general. Although the flare length is relatively short and not truly representative of a practical configuration. Sci. February 27-March 2. These values were obtained at near adiabatic wall conditions. Theory of the Interior Ballistics of Guns (John Wiley & Sons Inc.16] * Aerospace Engineer. respectively d. i. respectively s = surface distance from cylinder-flare junction. England. E. respectively. 20.

- 139-en
- 12th IBCAST Program Jan 01 2015
- Standard Faq En
- PriceList En
- Helicopter Engineer 0
- Anit Collision Systems
- 0706
- 98-1066-1-PB
- 01174744
- 132002_Faktura Oprox_Raza Ali ICMT13
- 288_31A
- 30mm_173mm
- art-10.1007-BF00749087
- 529_microwave Circuit Design by Prashanth
- 04-Fuze
- Proteus DSO Printing
- 调频连续波雷达信号调制方式识别算法研究
- radar analysis
- 6.1978-564
- 04-FuzeFiringDevice
- 2010 Fmu 152 Layout w Nsn
- 45188371 Global Positioning System
- 06177515
- 06009973_2

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulData sheet 32918

Data sheet 32918

- Classical Mechanics HW
- Flight Simulation Theory
- Modifications 1
- mel715-10
- Introduction to
- 19710019929_1971019929
- Design of Liqiud Propellant Rockets
- Nomenclature
- water rocket
- NASA Sounding Rockets, 1958 - 1968 a Historical Summary
- https://ar.scribd.com/doc/53524896/Wet-Dry-Scrubber
- traj.pdf
- Water Rocket Glider
- rocket launching
- Basic Physics of Rocket Propulsion
- Hydrogen Peroxide for Power
- NASA Facts Robert H Goddard American Rocket Pioneer
- Virgin Galactic Brochure
- KSC Soda Straw Rocket-Mars 2009a
- Script Essay
- Science of Love -- IRP for Chemistry[1]
- Rocket
- buran2
- 3.2.1.Liftoff
- 98Rockets Project X51
- Laboratory Report - Newton's Laws of Motion
- Brain Dump 30 - 2015 UK
- Fizik F4 P2 (2016)
- A Rocket is a Missile
- Untitled
- 3.29128

Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

We've moved you to where you read on your other device.

Get the full title to continue

Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

scribd