You are on page 1of 114

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND DEPARTMENT
_____________________________________________

Christopher-Earl: Strunk, in esse

Appellant / Plaintiff STATEMENT
Against PURSUANT
TO CPLR 5531
NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS etal.

Appellees / Defendants
_____________________________________________

1. The Index Number of this Case in Trial Court is 6500-2011.
2. The Full names of the Original Parties are unchanged.
3. The action was commenced in NYS Supreme Court Kings County Part 27.
4. The action was commenced on 22 March 2011.
5. The Nature of the Case is related to the 2008 presidential election and fraud
associated with it and derives from current active related cases with Index
No.: 29642-2008 and 21948-2012 in NYS Sup. Ct. Kings County Part 43.
6. The appeal is from the 29 March 2013 Decision and Order of Arthur M.
Schack for Sanctions.
7. This appeal is on the Original Record subpoenaed from the County Clerk of
trial court and in the possession of the Clerk of this Appellate Court.





--------------------------------------------------------------------x
Christopher-Earl: Strunk, in esse
Plaintiff / Appellant, APPEAL CASE
-against-
INDEX NO.:
NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS;
J AMES A.WALSH, DOUGLAS A. KELLNER / Co-Chairmen, 2013-06335
EVELYN J . AQUILA / Commissioner, GREGORY P.
PETERSON / Commissioner, Deputy Director TODD D.
VALENTINE, Deputy Director STANLEY ZALEN;
ANDREW CUOMO, ERIC SCHNEIDERMAN, THOMAS P.
DINAPOLI, RUTH NOEMÍ COLÓN, in their Official and
individual capacity; Fr. J OSEPH A. O'HARE, S.J .;
Fr. J OSEPH P. PARKES, S.J .; FREDERICK A.O. SCHWARZ, J R.;
PETER G. PETERSON, ZBIGNIEW KAIMIERZ BRZEZINSKI;
MARK BRZEZINSKI; J OSEPH R. BIDEN, J R.; SOEBARKAH
(a.k.a. Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barack Hussein Obama II,
a.k.a. Steve Dunham); NANCY PELOSI; DEMOCRATIC
STATE COMMITTEE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK;
STATE COMMITTEE OF THE WORKING FAMILIES
PARTY OF NEW YORK STATE; RÓGER CALERO;
THE SOCIALIST WORKERS PARTY; IAN J . BRZEZINSKI;
J OHN SIDNEY MCCAIN III; J OHN A. BOEHNER;
THE NEW YORK STATE REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE;
THE NEW YORK STATE COMMITTEE OF THE
INDEPENDENCE PARTY; STATE COMMITTEE OF
THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF NEW YORK STATE;
PENNY S. PRITZKER; GEORGE SOROS; OBAMA FOR
AMERICA; OBAMA VICTORY FUND; MCCAIN VICTORY
2008; MCCAIN-PALIN VICTORY 2008; J ohn and J ane Does;
and XYZ Entities.
Defendants / Respondents.



APPELLANT’S REPLY TO THE BRIEF FOR DEFENDANTS-
RESPONDENTS ZBIGNIEW KAIMIERZ BRZEZINSKI,
MARK BRZEZINSKI and IAN J. BRZEZINSKI

1


STATE OF NEW YORK )
} ss:
COUNTY OF KINGS )

Accordingly, I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris agent debtor trust
transmitting utility ™CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK© Appellant (STRUNK),
being duly sworn. depose and say under penalty of perjury:
Introduction
This is Appellant’s Reply to the Response Brief for DEFENDANTS-
RESPONDENTS ZBIGNIEW KAIMIERZ BRZEZINSKI, MARK BRZEZINSKI
and IAN J . BRZEZINSKI in regards to the Second of Three Appellant’s Briefs for
the appeal 2013-06335 taken from the March 29, 2013 Order entered by McGuire
Woods LLP on April 18, 2013 counsel to Defendants ZBIGNIEW KAIMIERZ
BRZEZINSKI, MARK BRZEZINSKI and IAN J . BRZEZINSKI in the total
money amount of $75,600.00 for attorney fees and $2,446.74 for disbursements for
a total of $78,156.74 resulted from the alleged frivolous conduct of Plaintiff
CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK as would apply to all the Defendants.
That Plaintiff’s fraud challenge as to the New York State Board of Elections
et al as to state action under color of law is a result of the discovery of their willful
misuse of United States Constitution Article II Section 1 Clause 5 (A2S1C5) as to
the merits of the eligibility requirements for any candidate slate seeking ballot
access and election to the office of President and or Vice President of the United
2


States (POTUS) along with each of those entities or persons materially seeking to
impose candidates onto the New York State ballot in 2008, 2012 and in 2016 as a
continuing harm by State entities aided and abetted by named Defendants in acts of
treason and misprision of treason with sedition as clearly defined 18 U.S. Code §
2381 – Treason; 18 U.S. Code § 2382 - Misprision of treason; 18 U.S. Code §
2383 - Rebellion or insurrection; 18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy; 18
U.S. Code § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of Government;
the Brzezinski Defendants conspired together to aid and abet the enemies of
the posterity of the United States of America to maintain the now 81 years of
martial process in continuance and furtherance of the overthrow of the Government
as defined by the Constitution to the United States, and did under color of their
public office of trust proceed to breach of public trust necessary in the conduct of
elections that despite being in full knowledge that any candidate must be eligible
under A2S1C5 to run and serve for the Office of President of the United States
(POTUS) proceeded nevertheless despite being forewarned of ineligibility in 2008
acted to place Barack Hussein Obama II aka Barry Soetoro aka SOEBARKAH,
aka Steve Dunham, aka Barry Allen Owens with J oseph R. Biden as a slate, that of
J ohn Sidney McCain III and the Palin slate and the Roger Calero slate onto the
ballot at the 2008 Presidential election cycle; and when all three Presidential
candidate slates were and are never to be eligible as “natural-born Citizens” of the
3


United States, and that all persons acted with intent of committing misprision of
treason in the commission of willful fraud against the beneficial interest of
Plaintiff’s unalienable rights who along with voters have been denied any remedy
available under law; and as such requires pure equity relief under the maxims of
equity here as if it were a Bill of Particulars for the Appellate Panel and Court
embanc to issue a decree for equity relief. In that the need for a decree by reason of
the lack of POTUS eligibility defines the very existence of the Court in a matter of
such magnitude that has never been a more important case involving grave national
security with the current facts and constellation of parties represented by the nine
attorneys is quite unlike any prior time in our short 230 or so years of history.
Executor Public Officer under martial process in lieu of civilian due process
On 4 March 2014 the Appellate Panel of J ustices PETER B. SKELOS,
THOMAS A. DICKERSON, J OHN M. LEVENTHAL, L. PRISCILLA HALL,
issued the Decision and Order M170416 on the Motion by the Appellant, inter
alia, denying provision "for civilian due process of law" on appeals from three
orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County from Case with Index no.: 6500-2011,
dated April 1l, 2012, March 29, 2013, and December 9, 2013, respectively. 12-
5515, 13-6335 and 14-00297. The historical importance of the Decision and Order
M170416, whether to continue under martial process as we have for 81 years under
men or return to civilian due process with our State and Federal Constitutions fully
4


in force to protect our freedom and unalienable rights under GOD, is front and
center in this third and final Appellant’s Appeal Brief for Appeal 2014-00297 for
consolidated hearing together with Appeal 2012-5515 taken from the Order of
April 11, 2012 filed J une 20, 2013, and Appeal 2013-6335 taken from the Order of
March 29, 2013 filed May 5, 2014 as against all defendants accompanies the
record subpoenaed for each of the Orders for use by the Court in deliberation.
Thus with the 4 March 2014 judicial notice given by Decision and Order
M170416, STRUNK became the duly appointed Executor public officer for the
Express Deed in Trust to the United States of America duly recorded with the
Superior Court of Georgia for Lamar County at BPA BOOK 32 PAGES 716 thru
754 on April 29, 2014 at 1:20 PM; and that STRUNK’s duty to the beneficiaries of
the Express Deed in Trust to the United States of America with a claim of
beneficial interest in and over all the public and private real, personal, tangible and
intangible property within the organic UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
geographic border to safeguard and secure for the posterity of WE the People of
the United States of America in the nation given by GOD for securing each private
Citizen’s unalienable rights and beneficial interest in pursuit of life liberty and
happiness in perpetuity, and with the Executor and Beneficiaries duty to the DEED
in TRUST shall guarantee that all incumbents and future candidate(s) for the
Office of President or Vice President of the United States (POTUS) shall be a
5


bonafide Natural-Born Citizen (NBC) private citizen of the United States agent
who is surety no more to the Debtor Trust Entity in compliance with the
Constitution for the United States Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 (A2S1C5), either
under 12 USC 95 with 50 USC App. 5(b) and related law with the Military
Government authority of the renewed annual National Emergency or otherwise
civil process.

Statements in Reply to The Counter-Statement of Issues On Appeal

First Amendment Right
Appellant as a private Citizen of the United States nunc pro tunc and Executor
Public Officer in regards to his own fundamental First Amendment Right to
Speech, Publish, Associate, and not least of which guarantees the right to
petition for redress of grievances (notwithstanding the martial process imposed
since the 9 March 1933 Executive Order 2040 forward) has an undeniable
absolute duty as a matter of rule of law, and given that all the acts of the usurper
are void ab initio, mandates as a matter of moral necessity that I oppose the
fundamental satanic evil embodied by the acts of all the Defendants using any
means available as done herein underlying the legitimate basis for this case; and


6


Duty to thwart Treason and sedition
Appellant-Plaintiff has an absolute duty to report and actively oppose Treason,
Misprision of treason, Rebellion or insurrection, Seditious conspiracy and those
advocating overthrow of Government as has been done by all Defendants; and is
especially true of the Brzezinski Defendants who had superior knowledge with
access to top secret intelligence under the control of the
NSA/CIA/DIA/MI6/GRU/FSB/MOSSAD/SHIN BET with whom those agencies
operate through the Center for Strategic and International Studies of the J esuit’s
Georgetown University, with Ian Brzezinski’s Booz Allen Hamilton, the Atlantic
Council overseeing agency of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO),
with its other coordinating agencies of the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) using its Office for Democratic Institutions and
Human Rights (ODIHR) to interfere with sovereign elections in coordination with
the United States Department of State (DOS).

Election Interference
That for the DOS, Mark Brzezinski notably has a track record of election
interference as in 2004 was ejected from Ukraine for interference with the
sovereignty and sanctity of election that year between Viktor Yushchenko and
7


Viktor Yanukovych requiring an election rerun
( ) 1
, and as recently done with
interference by the DVD agent J ohn Sidney McCain III in 2013 for the overthrow
of the duly elected government after Ukraine’s President Viktor Yanukovich
abandoned plans for a trade association with the European Union
( ) 2
, with his an
outrageous record of interference was rewarded with appointment as the United
States Ambassador to Sweden at the seat of the Swedish Rite of Masonry effecting
the Russian Federation through attempts to overthrow that government now,
according to my British Intelligence expert and my friend Michael Shrimpton, is
using Deutscher Verteidigungs der Dienst (DVD) agent Dmitry Medvedev against
Vladimir Putin
( ) 3
.

CIA Employment of Barry Soetoro
That not only did Zbigniew Brzezinski know and encourage the direct employment
of Barry Soetoro SOEBARKAH with use of the CIA’s Business International
Corporation (BIC) to conduct war against the fundamental interests of the
posterity of the United States, but all knew beyond a shadow of a doubt where
Barry Soetoro was born and that neither parent was an American Citizen; and


1
http://www.usukraine.org/election2004media.shtml

2
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2013/12/mccain-tells-ukraine-protesters-america-is-with-you/

3
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/europe/03/21/russia.leaders.libya/index.html
8


STASI Legend for Barry Soetoro was for Barack Hussein Obama Sr.
that Zbigniew Brzezinski knew the usurpation was done with the use of the
specialized transcontinental legends of Stasi spymaster General Marcus Wolf
working for spymaster George H.W. Bush, the DVD Obermeister Fuhrer, since
22 November 1963 uses every effort in coordination with Operation Gladio /
Algerian Secret Army Organization (OAS) / Carlos “the J ackel” tension/release
networks in Europe and the Western Hemisphere, and beyond just Propaganda
Duo (P-2), Red Brigades, Baader Meinhof, Irish Republican Army here includes
the Weather Underground, Socialist Workers Party / Communist Party USA /
Progressive Labor Party and designed spin-offs now related to the so-called
Environmental Movement, with gang / counter-gang terrorist organizations that
mirror the long established MS-13, that like La Raza and the Atzlan Movement
were started by the GRU for the Abwehr /DVD in Mexico by Leon Trotsky before
his death for operating freely across the USA national border; and I contend all are
associated with the Le Cercle directors that include Frank Wisner and Zbigniew
Brzezinski operating with the Correa Group of Frankfurt West Germany
previously under the Allen and J ohn Dulles brothers and the General Operations
Group 2 (GO2) in London and with the General Reinhart Gehlen Organization, as
previously directed by DVD over boss Dwight Eisenhower until 1963.
9


Brzezinski family members use every opportunity for manufacturing war with
Russia, use the usurper accordingly along with the DVD’s McCain lose cannon.
The First Amendment is not for use in the commission of treason
That based upon the foregoing not to belabor the point, Appellant replies in
oppositional wonderment to Mr. Beil’s statement on page 12 that quote:
“The Brzezinski Defendants did nothing to invite Plaintiffs ongoing legal
assault other than exercise their First Amendment rights of speech and
association.”

There is no right of speech to scream fire and lie in the commission of treason.

No sanction in either Federal or State Court regarding POTUS Eligibility
Further, based upon the foregoing, Appellant replies in opposition to Mr. Beil’s
support of the Organizational Stalker Arthur M. Schack who also cherry picks
various cases for which I have been involved with since 1996 ONLY lists some of
them, and does so without listing any of his own that I suspect list in the hundreds.
Mr. Beil fails to mention several state cases and remarkably fails to mention the
Case filed March 20, 2007, Jah Thomas, Basil Guilavigui and Christopher Earl
Strunk v the Federal Reserve Bank of New York et al USDC EDNY 2007cv01171
(ARR)
( ) 5
therein challenging the harm caused by the use of the sub-prime

5
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/new-york/nyedce/1:2007cv01171/267531/

Thomas et al v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Lewis A. Watkins, Bedford-Stuyvesant
Restoration Corp., City of New York, NYC Department of Housing Preservation and
Development, Brooklyn Community Board #3, Elizabeth A. Rodriguez, Rockefeller Foundation,
11


mortgage scam setup by then HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo being the DVD
agent Attorney General of New York abetting the 2008 collapse of mortgages
benefiting offshore accounts of Deutsche Bank’s Millennium Group Medium Term
Note private trading program entities leading to the questionable bailout of General
Motors (whose previous assistant General Counsel was Allyne R. Ross) etcetera.
That as part of my contract for which I was hired in 2005 to study the theft of more
than Ten Million Dollars from the ex wife of the Director of the Culinary Institute
of America and to attempt to recover the funds, I studied the fraud conducted by
the New York Province for the Society of J esus in Dutchess County in its purchase
of zoning changes and associated vote fixing arranged by attorney Thomas Spargo
for the Galleria Malls organization, and
Further, the process that lead to the purchase and control of New York State
and Federal judges associated with the 700 or so acres of prime real estate in
Dutchess county that required the finagling use of Hudson River water for other
than fire fighting, and required the $750,000 straw man purchase by the ex-wife’s
J esuit co-adjutor Husband for parlaying the zoning changes and a development

Goldman Sachs Urban Fund, Richard Roberts, Forest City Ratner,, Bruce Ratner, United States
Housing and Urban Development, Andrew Cuomo, Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce, Marty
Markowitz, Albany Decatur Redevelopment Company, Colvin Grannum, Central Brooklyn
Partnership, Mark Winston Griffith, Boylan F. Boylan, Annette Robinson, Albert Vann and
Edolphus Towns



12


based upon use of Hudson River Water be turned into a 5 billion dollar
development with French Investment; and
Further, as part of my challenge I requested that the CIA provide the files on
Fr. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin SJ (buried at the Culinary Institute), the father of the
New Age Movement, “Peking Man” and facilitator of Mao Zedong to power in
1949, who along with his agents in US Naval Office of Naval Intelligence
transferred tons of gold from China from no less than 1935 forward and having
died in 1955 and dead for fifty-two years as a foreigner with French citizenship, I
did my FOIA request nd wanted to know what records the CIA have on De
Chardin, and in response the CIA stated it could neither admit nor deny any
knowledge of any files, and after the standard appeal on such the CIA invited me
in writing to sue them in USDC, and
Further with written permission, I filed the case Strunk v United States
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Scott Koch, United States Department of State
(DOS), Condoleezza Rice, United States Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), Michael Chertoff, United States Department of J ustice (DOJ ), Michael
Mukasey, New York Province of the Society of J esus and Fr. Gerald Chojnacki, SJ
USDC EDNY 07cv1196 (ARR)
( ) 6
, that to say the least J udge Ross with the CIA
written invitation had to take the case; however, after much thrashing about J udge

6
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/new-york/nyedce/1:2008cv01196/278946 (ARR)
13


Ross stated that the CIA was acting in good faith dismissed the case and as to other
defendants, and that ever since no information has ever been received other than
the blowback caused by the new age devotee J udge Ross -- my sworn opponent.
As part of the case Loeber et al v Spargo et al USDC NDNY 04-cv-1194 before
Lawrence E, Kahn, the corrupt state judge having been involved with Thomas
Spargo in fixing zoning in Dutchess county effecting the ex-wife of the Director of
the Culinary Institute of America
( ) 7
, was filed and ended up before the very same
corrupt State J udge who had fixed the zoning and real property taking for the
J esuits and was rewarded by appointment to the Federal bench despite open
opposition by the bar association.
There are other important cases that Mr. Beil failed to mention among many
includes my work with the Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Assn v.
County of Albany USDC NDNY before Chief J udge Mordue, Kuntz v the New
York Commission on Judicial Conduct and state election law cases that also went
to federal court such as the New York Independence Party v NYS BOE case USDC
SDNY before J ed Rakoff among others not raised by Mr. Beil, in 2011 (the so-
called Dragon Family Case associated with the De Chardin gold transfers now
under CIA direction) Keenan v Dal Bosco et al 11 cv 8500 in USDC SDNY before
J udge J essie M. Ferman
( ) 8
, among multiple cases in USDC District of Columbia in

7
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/new-york/nyndce/1:2004cv01193/57049 (LEK)
8

14


regards to the FOIA to the US Department of Agriculture for subsidy information
on farms in New York withheld on the basis of nationals security among other
cases on the Census and Logan Act. Yes I have been busy as it is my duty and right
under the First Amendment to find out what my government is doing in my name.
That were Plaintiff / Appellant on the merits found not to be quote “fanciful,
fantastic, delusional, irrational and baseless claims about defendants is frivolous”
then, now or in the future as Plaintiff was adjudged by Arthur M. Schack J SC at
the Trial court level with Kings County Index no: 6500-2011 on April 11, 2012, 29
March 2013 and again reaffirmed 9 December 2013 then this Court must reverse
the outrageous decisions and return this matter to trial court with a new unbiased
J ustice for further litigation, for this matter is not going away anytime soon; and
notwithstanding whether New York regards treason and sedition per se as do other
states of the several states, is a sacred Federal obligation of duty.

Arguments in support of remand to Part 43 instead of Part 27
Let me be quite clear to this court, the Brzezinski Defendants for both
ideological and personal self-interest quid pro quo reasons promoted both
Manchurian candidates J ohn Sidney McCain III born outside of the United States
who was naturalized at the DOS when his parents rotated back from their tour of

http://www.scribd.com/doc/79111728/UPDATE-with-Voluntary-Withdrawal-of-Complaint-by-Keenan-in-re-CES-
NOM-to-Intervene-With-Exhibits-and-MOL-USDC-SDNY-11-Cv-8500-and-proposed-supplement
15


Further, that Zbigniew Brzezinski knew and used the fact of Mr. Obama’s
membership of the Muslim Brotherhood International and
Further, that Zbigniew Brzezinski knew and used the fact of Mr. Obama’s
membership in the Islamic SUBUD Cult through his training in Indonesia and
Further, that Zbigniew Brzezinski knew and used the fact of Mr. Obama’s
glaringly practice to provide the basis for collaboration with his fellow Islamist
Muslim Brother Fethullah Gülen of Turkey (living in the Pennsylvania Poconos),
whose members are afforded carte blanch entry and employment in the White
House since 2009 (thanks to Fr. Thomas Michel SJ ); and
Further, that Zbigniew Brzezinski knew and used the fact of Mr. Obama’s
practice with these Muslim Brothers use of J ihadist principles of “Sword, word,
pen and donation” a malicious practice of al Takia for enemy deception mandated
by the Koran, to the end of establishing the global Caliphate, and
Further, that Zbigniew Brzezinski knew and used the fact of Mr. Obama’s
every act to imperil the USA – British Special Relationship is to reverse the efforts
of Winston Churchill and Thomas Edward Lawrence who having defeated the
Kaiser’s Ottoman Caliphate ally redrew Mideast borders in 1921, and
Further, that Zbigniew Brzezinski knew and used the fact of Mr. Obama’s
intent to banish Churchill’s Bust from the White House,
17


Further, that Zbigniew Brzezinski knew and used the fact of Mr. Obama’s
intent that in J une 2009 would order reinstatement of the Egyptian Muslim
Brotherhood terrorist organization (banned since the murder of Anwar Sadat); and
Further, that Zbigniew Brzezinski knew and used the fact of Mr. Obama’s
usurpation that together with DVD agents Biden, Soros, Peterson, Pritzker, Pelosi,
and third generation Abwehr /DVD agent J ohn S. McCain III; and ALL in
promotion of his thirty year effort to spread the Arc of Crisis as a member of the
Global Crisis Group that the DVD efforts would presently act to overthrow the
USA secular allies in Africa and Mideast nations, and
Further, that Zbigniew Brzezinski knew and used the fact of Mr. Obama’s
collaboration with the sinister malice of fellow J ihadist J ohn O. Brennan who
according to retired FBI Agent J ohn Guandola confirmed
( ) 10
that Fordham J esuit
trained coadjutor J ohn Owen Brennan, from 1996 through 1999 while the CIA

10
“Mr. Brennan did convert to Islam when he served in an official capacity on the behalf of the
United States in Saudi Arabia,” Guandolo told interviewer and radio host Tom Trento.
Guandolo, who retired from the FBI in 2008, told the United States Trento Radio Show
Brennan without a doubt converted to Islam in Saudi Arabia and visited Mecca and Medina
during the hajj season along with Saudi officials. He went on to say that these Saudi officials
may have been that catalyst to Brennan’s conversion.
“That fact alone is not what is most disturbing,” Guandolo continued. “His conversion to
Islam was the culmination of a counterintelligence operation against him to recruit him. The fact
that foreign intelligence service operatives recruited Mr. Brennan when he was in a very
sensitive and senior U.S. government position in a foreign country means that he either a traitor
… [or] he has the inability to discern and understand how to walk in those kinds of
environments, which makes him completely unfit to be the director of Central Intelligence.”
- See more at: http://www.opposingviews.com/i/religion/islam/did-john-brennan-convert-islam-
being-picked-president-obama-new-cia-chief#sthash.jtu8f7sP.dpuf

18


along with the posterity of the sovereign people of the United States of America
for whom this Executor represents as a public officer, and who has been
outrageously harmed by this most massive fraud in our 230 year history bar none.
That based upon the record subpoenaed and delivered to the Clerk of this
Court as a record associated with matters of elections law with willful fraud
perpetrated upon Plaintiff, and heretofore, there has not been any legal relief or
remedy for Plaintiff or anyone else in the Country either in Federal or State
jurisdiction in the matter of the usurpation of the Office of POTUS, that this is a
matter of grave national security involving high crimes outrageously ignored by
Federal / State judges and State authorities despite notice of misprision of treason.
That Appellant wishes pure equity remedy herein pursuant to the Bill of
Particulars expressed in the 13-6335 Brief that would include sealing this case and
issuing subpoenas and testimony for a broad solution decree under the maxims of
equity and Appellant wishes further and different relief this Panel deems necessary
for complete justice including affording oral argument and sur-reply.
I have read the foregoing Reply Brief for Appeal 2013-06335; the same is
true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on
information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true. The grounds
of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as
follows: 3
rd
parties, books and records, and personal knowledge.
20
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF KINGS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------x Appeal Index No.: 2013-06335

Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse,

Plaintiff,
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
-against-

NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al.,

Defendants.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------x

STATE OF NEW YORK )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KINGS )

Accordingly, I, ____________________, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:

a. Am over 18 years of age and not a party to this action.
b. My place of business is located at __________________________________________________________.
c. On August 8, 2014, Christopher Strunk instructed me to serve two (2) true conformed copies of
the Appellant’s REPLY TO THE BRIEF FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS ZBIGNIEW KAIMIERZ
BRZEZINSKI, MARK BRZEZINSKI and IAN J. BRZEZINSKI for Appeal Case 2013-06335 affirmed
August 7, 2014 for the appeal from case Strunk v NYS BOE et al. NYS County of Kings Supreme
Court with index 6500-2011, by USPS service upon Appellees’ Counsels.
d. On August 8, 2014, I caused each set of copies with proper postage for service by regular mail of
listed counsels and going to the post office where each envelope was deposited with the USPS for
service upon:

Erica Burke, Esq. of SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
425 Lexington Avenue New York. New York 10017-3954

RITA C. TOBIN, Esq. of CAPLIN & DRYSDALE, CHARTERED
375 Park Avenue 35th Floor New York. New York 10152-3500

HARRIS BEACH, PLLC By THOMAS J. GARRY, Esq.
The OMNI 333 Earle Ovington Blvd., Suite 901 Uniondale, New York 11553

JAMES C. DUGAN Esq. of WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP
787 Seventh Avenue New York, N.Y. 10019-6099

MARSHAL BEIL, Esq. of McGUIRWOODS LLP
1345 Avenue of Americas, 7th Floor New York, New York 10105

WILEY REIN LLP - TODD A. BROMBERG ESQ. , J AN WITHOLD BARAN ESQ. and
THOMAS W. KIRBY ESQ. 1776K Street, NW Washington D.C. 20006

RABINOWITZ, BOUDIN, STANDARD, KRINSKY & LIEBERMAN, PC – Christopher J . Latell Esq.
and Daniel S. Reich Esq. 45 Broadway, Suite 1700 New York, New York 10006-3791

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General of NYS by: CLAUDE PLATTON, Esq. AAG Assist Attorney General
Special Litigation Counsel Litigation Bureau 120 BROADWAY – 24th Floor New York, New York 10271-0332

MICHAEL CARDOZO Corporation Counsel of City of New York By: CHLARENS ORSLAND, Esq. Assistant
Corporation Counsel New York City Law Department 100 Church Street New York, New York 10007


___________________________
Affirmed to before me
This ___ day of August 2014


_____________________
Notary Public


Plaintiff / Appellant

Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse
Appellant self-represented w/o attorney
593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281
Brooklyn, New York 11238
Ph. 845-901-6767 Email: chris@strunk.ws


Defendants / Respondents

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General of NYS
by: CLAUDE PLATTON, Esq. AAG Assistant Attorney General
120 BROADWAY – 25th Floor
New York, New York 10271-0332
Telephone (212) 416-8020

Representing: NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS:
J AMES A. WALSH, DOUGLAS A. KELLNER, Co-Chairs
EVELYN J . AQUILA / Commissioner, GREGORY P.
PETERSON / Commissioner, Deputy Director TODD D.
VALENTINE, Deputy Director STANLEY ZALEN;
ANDREW CUOMO, ERIC SCHNEIDERMAN, THOMAS P.
DINAPOLI, RUTH NOEMÍ COLÓN, in their Official and individual capacity;
DEMOCRATIC STATE COMMITTEE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK;
STATE COMMITTEE OF THE WORKING FAMILIES PARTY OF NEW
YORK STATE; THE NEW YORK STATE REPUBLICAN STATE
COMMITTEE; THE NEW YORK STATE COMMITTEE OF THE
INDEPENDENCE PARTY; STATE COMMITTEE OF
THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF NEW YORK STATE;

Todd E. Phillips, Esq. of
CAPLIN & DRYSDALE, CHARTERED
One Thomas Circle, N.W., Suite 1100,
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone:

Representing:
J OHN SIDNEY MCCAIN III; MCCAIN VICTORY
2008; MCCAIN-PALIN VICTORY 2008;
i


THOMAS J . GARRY, Esq. of
HARRIS BEACH, PLLC
The OMNI 333 Earle Ovington Blvd., Suite 901
Uniondale, New York 11553
Telephone:

Representing:
J OSEPH R. BIDEN, J R.; SOEBARKAH (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barack
Hussein Obama II, a.k.a. Steve Dunham); NANCY PELOSI; PENNY S.
PRITZKER; OBAMA FOR AMERICA; OBAMA VICTORY FUND


J AMES C. DUGAN Esq. of
WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP
787 Seventh Avenue
New York, N.Y. 10019-6099
Telephone:

Representing: GEORGE SOROS;

MARSHAL BELL, Esq. of
McGUIRE WOODS LLP
1345 Avenue of Americas, 7th Floor
New York, New York 10105
Telephone:

Representing: ZBIGNIEW KAIMIERZ BRZEZINSKI;
MARK BRZEZINSKI; IAN J . BRZEZINSKI;


TODD A. BROMBERG ESQ. of
WILEY REIN LLP -
1776K Street, NW
Washington D.C. 20006
Telephone:

Representing: J OHN A. BOEHNER;


ii

Christopher J . Latell Esq. and Daniel S. Reich Esq. of
RABINOWITZ, BOUDIN, STANDARD, KRINSKY & LIEBERMAN, PC –
45 Broadway, Suite 1700
New York, New York 10006-3791
Telephone:

Representing: RÓGER CALERO; THE SOCIALIST WORKERS PARTY


Erica Burke, Esq. of
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
425 Lexington Avenue
New York. New York 10017-3954
Telephone:

Representing: PETER G. PETERSON


MICHAEL CARDOZO Corporation Counsel of City of New York
By: CHLARENS ORSLAND, Esq. Assistant Corporation Counsel
New York City Law Department
100 Church Street New York, New York 10007
Telephone: (212) 788-0904

Representing: Fr. J OSEPH A. O'HARE, S.J .; Fr. J OSEPH P. PARKES, S.J .;
FREDERICK A.O. SCHWARZ, J R.;


iii

APPELLANT BRIEF

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Parties……………………………………………………………………..……….i

Table of Authorities………………………………………………………………vi

Introduction………………………………………………………………………..2

Statement of the Case on Appeal…………………………...………..……………3
J udicial Notices in regards to the Status of Appellant
• First J udicial Notice: (A) that there is a pending decision herein on the
notice of motion filed with this court with a return date of April 25, 2014 for
enlargement of time (B) that there are active related cases before the
Honorable David I Schmidt in Kings Count Supreme with Index Nos:
29642-2008 and 21948-2012………………………………………..…….4
• Second J udicial Notice: that the trial for 29642-2008 and 21948-2012 will
prove fraud in the use of forged documents for Barack Hussein Obama II to
gain ballot access to USURP the Office of POTUS in both the 2008 and
2012 elections cycles as an act of treason and misprision of treason………4
• Third J udicial Notice: that on April 29, 2014 at 1:20PM the Clerk of
Superior Court of Georgia for the County of Lamar recorded the notice of
acceptance of appointment of Christopher Earl Strunk as the Executor /
iv

Settlor of The Express Deed in Trust to The United States of America in
BPA BOOK 32 PAGES 716 thru 754……………………………………..5
The Definition of “natural-born Citizen” did not derive from the term natural-born
Subject”…………………………………………………………………………..6
Bill of Particular Allegations for pure Equity Relief……………………………12
Conclusion in support of Relief…………………………………………………19
Appellant state regarding compliance with Appellate rules………..…………...20
Appellant J urat…………………………………………………………………..20
APPELLANT’S COMBINED 36 page APPEAL APPENDIX after Brief J urat

That the original record of the case 6500-2011 associated with the ORDERs of
April 11, 2012, March 29, 2013 and December 9, 2013 were subpoenaed and were
delivered to the Clerk of the Appellate Court for the Second J udicial Department

APPELLANT’S COMBINED 36 page APPEAL APPENDIX

In addition to the original record on appeal with the Clerk of the Court The
Abbreviated APPENDIX is annexed herewith that includes:
• The Notice of Appeal from the Order of March 29, 2013,…………….Apx 1
• The statement for appeal ……………………………………………...Apx 3
• Defendant Notice of Entry……………………………………………..Apx 7
• The Order of March 29, 2013………………………………………….Apx 9
• Plaintiff service of Notice of Appeal………………………………….Apx 36
v
Table of Authorities

Pages
Cases

Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162 (1875) 8

U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) 9

Brown v Bernstein, DCPA 49 F. Supp 728 732 6

Federal Statutes

18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason 5

18 U.S. Code § 2382 - Misprision of treason 5

12 USC 95a and 50 USC App. 5(b) 6,7

United States Constitution
Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5
3,6, 9,
12
14th Amendment 14

Other sources

The Law of Nations, Section 212 (London 1797) 9

A Proposal For Printing in English, The Select Orations of Marcus Tullius
Cicero according to the last Oxford Edition 17 (Henry Eelbeck trans.
London 1720). 9

“Politics, Book Three, Part II,
Aristotle, writing in 350 B.C.E., as translated by Benjamin J owett, 7

J .S. Reeves, The Influence of the Law of Nature Upon International Law
in the United States, 3 Am.J . Int’l L. 547 et. seq. passim (1909) 10

Lee A. Casey, David B. Rivkin, J r. and Darin R. Bartram, Unlawful
Belligerency and Its Implications Under International Law, 10

R.G. Natelson, The Original Constitution 49 and 69 (2010) 10

Related cases:
Strunk v Paterson et al. NYS Supt Ct. Kings County Index 2,4
No.: 29642-08

Strunk v J effries et al. NYS Supt Ct. Kings County Index 2,4
No.: 21948-12




--------------------------------------------------------------------x
Christopher-Earl: Strunk, in esse
Plaintiff / Appellant, APPEAL CASE
-against-
INDEX NO.:
NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS;
J AMES A.WALSH / Co-Chair, DOUGLAS A. KELLNER / Co-Chair, 2013-06335
EVELYN J . AQUILA / Commissioner, GREGORY P.
PETERSON / Commissioner, Deputy Director TODD D.
VALENTINE, Deputy Director STANLEY ZALEN;
ANDREW CUOMO, ERIC SCHNEIDERMAN, THOMAS P.
DINAPOLI, RUTH NOEMÍ COLÓN, in their Official and
individual capacity; Fr. J OSEPH A. O'HARE, S.J .;
Fr. J OSEPH P. PARKES, S.J .; FREDERICK A.O. SCHWARZ, J R.;
PETER G. PETERSON, ZBIGNIEW KAIMIERZ BRZEZINSKI;
MARK BRZEZINSKI; J OSEPH R. BIDEN, J R.; SOEBARKAH
(a.k.a. Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barack Hussein Obama II,
a.k.a. Steve Dunham); NANCY PELOSI; DEMOCRATIC
STATE COMMITTEE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK;
STATE COMMITTEE OF THE WORKING FAMILIES
PARTY OF NEW YORK STATE; RÓGER CALERO;
THE SOCIALIST WORKERS PARTY; IAN J . BRZEZINSKI;
J OHN SIDNEY MCCAIN III; J OHN A. BOEHNER;
THE NEW YORK STATE REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE;
THE NEW YORK STATE COMMITTEE OF THE
INDEPENDENCE PARTY; STATE COMMITTEE OF
THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF NEW YORK STATE;
PENNY S. PRITZKER; GEORGE SOROS; OBAMA FOR
AMERICA; OBAMA VICTORY FUND; MCCAIN VICTORY
2008; MCCAIN-PALIN VICTORY 2008; J ohn and J ane Does;
and XYZ Entities.
Defendants / Respondents.



APPELLANT’S COMBINED APPEAL BRIEF AND APPENDIX


Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 1 of 20


STATE OF NEW YORK )
} ss:
COUNTY OF KINGS )

Accordingly, I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris agent, being duly
sworn. depose and say:
Introduction
This is the Appellant’s Appeal Brief for Appeal 2013-6335 for consolidated
hearing together with Appeal 2012-5515 taken from the Order of April 11, 2012
filed J une 20, 2013, and Appeal 2014-00297 taken from the Order of December 9,
2013 as against all defendants accompanies the record subpoenaed for each of the
Orders for use by the Court in deliberation.
That this Appellant’s Brief for the appeal 2013-6335 taken within 35
calendar days from the March 29, 2013 Order entered by McGuire Woods LLP on
April 18, 2013 counsel to Defendants ZBIGNIEW KAIMIERZ BRZEZINSKI,
MARK BRZEZINSKI and IAN J . BRZEZINSKI in the total money amount of
$75,600.00 for attorney fees and $2,446.74 for disbursements for a total of
$78,156.74 resulted from the alleged frivolous conduct of Plaintiff
CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK as would apply to all the Defendants (see the
annexed Order and Notice of Appeal with statement filed the court);


Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 2 of 20


Statement of the Case on Appeal
That were Plaintiff on the merits found not to be “Delusional, Fanciful and
Frivolous” as Plaintiff was adjudged by Arthur M. Schack J SC at the Trial court
level with Kings County Index no: 6500-2011 on April 11, 2012; and
That Plaintiff’ fraud challenge as to the New York States Board of Elections
et al is a result of the discovery of their willful misuse of United States
Constitution Article II Section 1 Clause 5 as to the merits of the eligibility
requirements for any candidate slate seeking ballot access and election to the office
of President and or Vice President of the United States (POTUS) along with each
of those entities or persons materially seeking to impose onto the New York State
ballot in 2008, 2012 and in 2016 as a continuing injury by state entities that despite
being warned of ineligibility in 2008 placed Barack Hussein Obama II aka Barry
Soetoro aka SOEBARKAH, aka Steve Dunham, aka Barry Allen Owens with
J oseph R. Biden as a slate, the J ohn Sidney McCain and the Palin slate and the
Roger Calero slate unto the ballot at the 2008 Presidential election cycle; and
when all three Presidential candidates slates were and are never to be eligible as
“natural-born Citizens” of the United States, and that all persons acted with intent
of committing misprision of treason in the commission of willful fraud against the
beneficial interest of Plaintiff’s unalienable rights who along with voters have been
denied any remedy available under law; and as such requires pure equity relief
Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 3 of 20


under the maxims of equity here as it were a Bill of particulars for the Appellate
Panel and Court embanc to issue a decree for equity relief. In that the need for a
decree by reason of the lack of POTUS eligibility defines the very existence of the
Court in matter of such magnitude that has never been a more important case
involving grave national security with such constellation of parties now
represented by the nine attorneys is quite unlike any prior time in case history.
Judicial Notices in regards to the Status of Appellant
Please take J udicial Notice that there is a pending decision herein on the
notice of motion filed with this court with a return date of April 25, 2014 for
enlargement of time herein to file this and the accompanying brief for the 2013-
6335 and 2014-00297 to be done after the trial for two (2) related electoral college
cases with Index Nos: 29642-2008 and 21948-2012 still before the Honorable
David I. Schmidt with motions taken on submission on 28 March 2014 awaiting
resolution for a consolidated trial for each schedule for J une 18, 2014 with a pre
trial conference scheduled J une 13, 2014.

Please Take Further J udicial Notice that the trial will prove fraud in the use
of forged documents for Barack Hussein Obama II to gain ballot access to USURP
the Office of POTUS in both the 2008 and 2012 elections cycles as an act of
Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 4 of 20


treason and misprision of treason at the state and or federal level is J udicial Notice
that carries personal liability for this Court according to Federal statutes quote:
18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or
adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United
States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be
imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than
$10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United
States.

18 U.S. Code § 2382 - Misprision of treason :
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of
the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon
as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some
judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a
particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both. (emphasis by
Appellate)

Please Take Further J udicial Notice that on April 29, 2014 at 1:20PM the Clerk of
Superior Court of Georgia for the County of Lamar recorded the notice of
acceptance of appointment of Christopher Earl Strunk as the Executor / Settlor of
The Express Deed in Trust to The United States of America in BPA BOOK 32
PAGES 716 thru 754; and that the acceptance by Christopher Earl Strunk in esse
Sui juris private citizen of the United States the secured beneficiary agent of the
Debtor Trust transmitting utility ™CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK©, is
appointed to perform the public duties of Executor and Settlor for the Express
Deed In Trust To The United States Of America With Beneficiary Discretion For
Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 5 of 20


Private Citizens Of The United States Who Are True Natural-Born Citizens Under
The United States Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 And Not Surety-
Indentures For Their Respective Debtor Trust Entity Under 12 USC 95a and 50
USC App. 5(b) Martial Government with a Continuing National Emergency
(Express Deed in Trust) responsible for the beneficial claim by its Beneficiaries,
with Settlor duty to the Express Deed in Trust shall guarantee that all incumbents
and future candidate(s) for the Office of President or Vice President of the United
States (POTUS) shall be a bonafide Natural-Born Citizen (NBC) private citizen of
the United States agent who is surety no more to the Debtor Trust Entity in
compliance with the United States Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5, either
under 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. 5(b) with the Military Government authority
of renewed annual National Emergency or otherwise; and with the understanding
that in regards to what is a “National Emergency”, Black’s Law 5
th
Edition cites
Brown v Bernstein, DCPA 49 F. Supp 728 732 that the United States Congress has
not made a distinction between a state of war and a state of national emergency.

The Definition of “natural-born Citizen” did not derive from the term
“natural-born Subject”
That Settlor’s duty as a public officer is to enforce through the Express Deed
in Trust the actual definition of the Natural-born Citizen clause, that as stated in the
Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 6 of 20


Appellant’s Brief filed with the Court on J une 20, 2013 for Appeal case 2012-
5515, the definition does not derive from the term of art “natural-born Subject”,
but instead was derived from ancient consideration of GOD’s Natural Law as
expressed in Greece by the works of Aristotle and carried forward for use in
Roman law by the works of Cicero.
Aristotle did not define citizenship like the English did in the English
common law in which they did not give any relevancy to the citizenship of the
child’s parents, provided the parents were not diplomats or military invaders.
Aristotle included in the definition of a “citizen” a person “of whom both the
parents are citizens.”
( ) 1
It is this definition which was handed down through the

1
Aristotle also gave us a definition of a “natural born Citizen.” In “Politics, Book Three, Part II,
Aristotle, writing in 350 B.C.E., as translated by Benjamin J owett, gave us his definition of
citizenship:
“Part II
But in practice a citizen is defined to be one of whom both the parents are citizens;
others insist on going further back; say to two or three or more ancestors. This is a short
and practical definition but there are some who raise the further question: How this third
or fourth ancestor came to be a citizen? Gorgias of Leontini, partly because he was in a
difficulty, partly in irony, said- 'Mortars are what is made by the mortar-makers, and the
citizens of Larissa are those who are made by the magistrates; for it is their trade to make
Larissaeans.' Yet the question is really simple, for, if according to the definition just
given they shared in the government, they were citizens. This is a better definition than
the other. For the words, 'born of a father or mother who is a citizen,' cannot possibly
apply to the first inhabitants or founders of a state.

There is a greater difficulty in the case of those who have been made citizens after a
revolution, as by Cleisthenes at Athens after the expulsion of the tyrants, for he enrolled
in tribes many metics, both strangers and slaves. The doubt in these cases is, not who is,
but whether he who is ought to be a citizen; and there will still be a furthering the state,
whether a certain act is or is not an act of the state; for what ought not to be is what is
false. Now, there are some who hold office, and yet ought not to hold office, whom we
describe as ruling, but ruling unjustly. And the citizen was defined by the fact of his
Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 7 of 20


millennia through the law of nations and which the Founders and Framers adopted
for the new republic. We also see that the then Supreme Court of the United States
(SCOTUS) in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162 (1875) (Minor)
(decided after the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted in 1868) held that "all
children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves,
upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as
distinguished from aliens or foreigners" informed that a person who became a
citizen by being born in the country to “citizen” parents was known in common
law with which the Framers were familiar as a “natural-born citizen.” How do we
know that the Founders and Framers looked to Aristotle’s view of citizenship? We
learn from the historical record that Supreme Court J ustice J ames Wilson wrote in
1791: “‘Generally speaking,’ says the great political authority, Aristotle, ‘a citizen
is one partaking equally of power and of subordination.’ … In Wilson's view, "a
citizen of Pennsylvania is he, who has resided in the state two years; and, within
that time, has paid a state or county tax: or he is between the ages of twenty one
and twenty two years, and the son of a citizen.” J ames Wilson, 1st commentaries
on the Constitution. Here we clearly see Wilson referring to what could only be a
“natural born Citizen” as "the son of a citizen."

holding some kind of rule or office- he who holds a judicial or legislative office fulfills
our definition of a citizen. It is evident, therefore, that the citizens about whom the doubt
has arisen must be called citizens.” …http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/politics.html .

Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 8 of 20


We also know that the Founders and Framers studied Roman law. The
Framers were well read in the Roman and Greek classics as is expounded upon in
their writings in the Federalist Papers. J efferson and other Founders had a love for
Roman history and education. The Founders and Framers were great admirers of
Cicero and read many of his works. It is not inconceivable that they would have
read this English translation of The Proposal
( ) 2
and seen the clause “natural born
Citizen.” This shows that they did not need to borrow the clause from English
common law’s “natural born subject.” Rather, they had sources that they read
which contained the exact clause, “natural born Citizen,” which clause also had its
own meaning which was different from that of an English “natural born subject”
which allowed children born in the King’s dominion and under his allegiance to
aliens to be English “natural born subjects.”
A definition of a “natural born Citizen” was also provided by the world-
renowned, Emer de Vattel in his The Law of Nations, Section 212 (London 1797)

2
Roman law provided: “Lex MENSIA, That a child should be held as a foreigner, if either of
the parents was so. But if both parents were Romans and married, children always obtained the
rank of the father, (patrem sequuntur liberi, Liv. iv. 4.) and if unmarried, of the mother, Uipian.”
Alexander Adam, Roman antiquities: or, An account of the manners and customs of the Romans
10 (6th ed. corrected 1807). Cicero wrote in A Proposal: 2

“The Colophonians claim Homer as their own free Denizen, the Chians challenge him as theirs,
the Salaminians demand him again for their own, but the Smyrneans assert him to be their
natural born Citizen; and therefore have also dedicated a Temple to him in their Town of
Smyrna. There are a great many besides at Daggers-drawing among themselves, and contend for
him.”

A Proposal For Printing in English, The Select Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero, According to
the last Oxford Edition 17 (Henry Eelbeck trans. London 1720).
Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 9 of 20


(1st ed. Neuchatel 1758). Vattel had a great influence on the Founders and Framers
in their constituting the new republic and writing the Constitution. See, for
example, J .S. Reeves, The Influence of the Law of Nature Upon International Law
in the United States, 3 Am.J . Int’l L. 547 et. seq. passim (1909) (Vattel exerted
such a profound political influence that it is often pointed out that his theories
served as the backbone for American independence) Lee A. Casey, David B.
Rivkin, J r. and Darin R. Bartram, Unlawful Belligerency and Its Implications
Under International Law,
( ) 3
(concerning U.S. constitutional analysis, “Vattel is
highly important. He was probably the international law expert most widely read
among the Framers”). In fact, Vattel continued to be practically applied in our
nation for well over 100 years after the birth of the republic; F.S. Ruddy, The
Acceptance of Vattel, Grotian Society Papers (1972) (Vattel was mainstream
political philosophy during the writing of the Constitution. The Law of Nations was
significantly the most cited legal source in America jurisprudence between 1789
and 1820). The Founders and Framers studied and were greatly influenced by
Vattel. R.G. Natelson, The Original Constitution 49 and 69 (2010) (“Vattel was
probably the Founders’ favorite authority on international law . . . .” and his,
treatise, The Law of Nations, was their favorite).
What Minor said about a “natural born Citizen” was confirmed in U.S. v.

3
http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/PubID.104/pub_detail.asp
Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 10 of 20


Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) (acknowledging and confirming Minor’s
American common law definition of a “natural-born citizen” but adding based on
the English common law that since “‘[t]he child of an alien, if born in the country,
is as much a citizen as the natural-born child of a citizen, and by operation of the
same principle [birth in the country]’” (bracketed information supplied), a child
born in the United States to domiciled alien parents was a Fourteenth Amendment
“citizen of the United States”). This American common law definition of a “natural
born Citizen” has never been changed, not even by the Fourteenth Amendment
(only uses the clause "citizen of the United States" and does not mention "natural
born Citizen") or by Wong Kim Ark, and therefore still prevails today. Both those
U.S. Supreme Court cases define a "natural born Citizen" as a child born in a
country to parents who are citizens of that country.
That for the reasons expressed above, notwithstanding whether a natural
person is born within a State of the United States of married citizen parents or of a
single US Citizen parent, the Executor and Beneficiaries of the Express Deed In
Trust To The United States Of America are of a singular class separate and apart
from those who are either naturalized or born a citizen, and are unable to certify as
eligible for Office of POTUS one of the conquered people of the United States of
America since 4 March 1933 as long as any dejure citizen of the United States
remains the surety-indenture for the Debtor trust with beneficial interest in the
Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 11 of 20


surety, for that natural person is the property of the United States and is a slave
unable to fulfill the duties of POTUS.
Therefore, the Executor/Settlor and Beneficiaries are bound by their
registered status as private citizens of the United States with their bonafide status
as a natural-born Citizen within the duties and obligations of the Express Deed in
Trust to only certify a candidate is eligible based upon the foregoing and shall seek
equity relief of a chancery or of pure equity court for relief against any person who
is a USURPER or attempts to USURP the POTUS to the contrary.

Bill of Particular Allegations for pure Equity Relief
1. That Barack Hussein Obama II admits that he was born in Kenya in his
Autobiography of 1996.
2. That J ohn Sidney McCain admits he was born in Panama during the assignment
of his married US Citizen Parents stationed in the Panama Canal Zone.
3. That Roger Calero was born in Nicaragua to parents who were not US Citizens.
4. That Barack Hussein Obama Senior is the natural and legal father of Barack
Hussein Obama II.
5. That there are no genuine official birth records known to exist regarding Barack
Hussein Obama Senior and or J unior in the British National Archives.
Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 12 of 20


6. That Barack Hussein Obama Senior was the son of a member of the Mau Mau
terrorist movement in the Sultanate of Zanzibar and British Protectorate.
7. That Barack Hussein Obama Senior was an important asset of the Mau Mau
movement being followed by Intelligence agencies.
8. That Intelligence agencies following Barack Hussein Obama Senior confirmed
that he had an unmarried paramour and who when he impregnated in 1959 bore
his son Barack Hussein Obama II
9. That the natural mother of Barack Hussein Obama II is not an American Citizen
nor was she married to Barack Hussein Obama Sr.
10. That Madeline Payne Dunham was an asset of German Intelligence before.
during and after World War II.
11. That Stanley Dunham and Madeline Dunham worked with the Central
Intelligence agency after the War.
12. That the CIA considered Barack Hussein Obama Senior an essential lead to
networks associated with the Mau Mau Movement in the USA and employed
Stanley and Madeline Dunham in creating a legend for Barack Hussein Obama
II in order to facilitate Barack Hussein Obama Senior’s ease of entry and
movement in the USA.
Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 13 of 20


13. That a person born as a “native” of a tribe and or non-European in Kenya and or
the Coastal Protectorate were not recorded as born in records kept at the British
Home Office.
14. That the natural mother of Barack Hussein Obama II is not Stanley Ann
Dunham.
15. That the natural mother of Barack Hussein Obama II is an Indonesian citizen.
16. That Barack Hussein Obama II was born on or about August 4, 1960 not on or
about August 4, 1961.
17. That Barack Hussein Obama II was born a subject of the Sultanate of Zanzibar
not a British Subject.
18. That Barack Hussein Obama II entered by commercial Air carrier from Kenya
during the month of August 1961 in the custody of a woman according to U.S.
Customs entry records and statistics.
19. That Stanley Ann Dunham is the woman who married Barack Hussein Obama
Senior in Hawaii in February 1961
20. That neither Stanley Ann Obama or Stanley Ann Soetoro had a passport before
1965.
21. That Barack Hussein Obama II lived with Stanley Ann Obama in Seattle
starting in August 1961 where she was enrolled as a student and attended
classes at the University of Washington.
Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 14 of 20


22. That a next door neighbor to Stanley Ann Dunham when interviewed confirmed
Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) was caring for a black child who was definitely
not a new born in August 1961.
23. That a person filed a Newspaper Notice in a Hawaiian newspaper announcing
the birth of Barack Hussein Obama II to Barack Hussein and Stanley Ann
Obama on August 4, 1961.
24. That within the period from 1979 thru 1983 Barack Hussein Obama II aka
Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Allen Owens received foreign student assistance in
order to pay tuition for Columbia University and that the records of such are on
file with the New York State Department of Education and or its repository of
records.
25. That Barack Hussein Obama II in his sworn application to obtain a license to
practice law from the Illinois Bar stated that he had never gone by any other
name other than Barack Hussein Obama.
26. That Barack Hussein Obama II “voluntarily” gave up his license to practice law
in Illinois for no expressed reason, an act that was not even done by Bill Clinton
in Arkansas when found guilty of perjury.
27. That in 2008 and again in 2011, Barack Hussein Obama II proffered two (2)
forged documents alleged by him to be the actual copy of the actual “short” and
Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 15 of 20


then “Long” form Certificate of Live Birth (CoLB), proven by several
documents to be forged instruments.
28. That Barack Hussein Obama II proffered a forged Selective Service registration
form as if it were done in 1980, and proven by several document experts to be
forged instruments.
29. That Barack Hussein Obama II has no social security number under his entity
name, and it is alleged he is not a legally admitted US citizen or legal
documented immigrant able to obtain proper registration with the Social
Security Administration.
30. That Barack Hussein Obama II is using the Social Security number of a person
born in 1890 in Europe and who legally immigrated to the United States and
obtained social security registration in the State of Connecticut and when he
moved to Hawaii before he died without ever filing for benefits.
31. That Madeline Dunham was the Trust officer for the Bank of Hawaii, inter alia
with the duty to be in charge of accounts of those who had died intestate, and
that she obtained use of the social security number for Barack Hussein Obama
II.
32. That Madeline Dunham was the Trust Officer of the Bank of Hawaii for
investments in the Pacific rim by the Ford Foundation officiated by Thomas
Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 16 of 20


Geithner the father of Timothy Geithner the Treasury Secretary appointed under
Barack Hussein Obama II.
33. That Stanley Ann Dunham was employed by the Ford Foundation while
working as a “Micro Lending Program” agent for both the Ford Foundation and
the Bank of Hawaii in the Pacific rim.
34. That the woman in charge of the Hawaii Department of Health in charge of
birth certificates and records died in a plane crash in 2013.
35. That the woman in charge of the Hawaii Department of Health in charge of the
alleged “CoLB” for Barack Hussein Obama II was the Hawaiian leader of
branch of the Indonesian SUBUD cult.
36. That Barack Hussein Obama II is a member of the Indonesian SUBUD cult.
37. That there is a DNA test of the Indonesian Soetoro half-sister of Barack
Hussein Obama II, and that the results show that she has no DNA shared with
Barack Hussein Obama II through Stanley Ann Dunham / Obama / Soetoro.
38. That there is a DNA test of Barack Hussein Obama II done while he was a U.S.
Senator by use of a water /wine glass(es) obtained at a public event by persons
posing as waiters, and the results show that he has no DNA shared through
Stanley Ann Dunham or the Dunham Family at all.
39. That based upon the above allegations, Barack Hussein Obama II is not NBC,
and therefore not eligible to annually renew the National Emergencies as the
Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 17 of 20


commander-in-chief with executive authority over all defacto martial rule
Federal and State(s) courts.
40. That for the debtor entity person to be eligible to file income tax returns with
the Internal Revenue Service the named entity person must have a surety-
indenture obligated to pay the tax.
41. That when the debtor entity person does not have a surety-indenture to pay the
taxes calculated for the annual income tax return filed with the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) the debtor entity is a “Non-taxpayer”.
42. That Barack Hussein Obama II, J oseph R. Biden, J ohn Sidney McCain, Roger
Calero, J ohn Boehner, Nancy Pelosi, Andrew Cuomo, signed the annual tax
return as surety-indenture for the debtor entity person filed with the Internal
Revenue Service.
43. That Barack Hussein Obama II, J oseph R. Biden, J ohn Sidney McCain, Roger
Calero, J ohn Boehner, Nancy Pelosi, Andrew Cuomo, remain the surety-
indenture for the Debtor entity person tax payer.
44. That none of the Defendants, especially Barack Hussein Obama II, J oseph R.
Biden, J ohn Sidney McCain, Roger Calero, J ohn Boehner, Nancy Pelosi,
Andrew Cuomo, have ceased to be the surety-indenture for their respective
Debtor Trust with beneficial interest in the living being having been wed as the
surety-indenture to the debtor entity person by operation of law when the name
Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 18 of 20


of the entity was registered after the natural birth or naturalization with the
respective State registrar, is thereafter treated as abandoned property of an
absentee person, by operation of the statutory scheme under 12 USC 95a and 50
USC App. 5(b), by the Alien Property Custodian (i.e. the United States
Secretary of the Treasury, the United States Attorney General, and other
agencies designated by the POTUS Commander-in-chief).
45. That the Debtor Trust transmitting utility ™CHRISTOPHER EARL
STRUNK© is a “Non-taxpayer” exempt from IRS filing.

Conclusion in support of Relief
Based upon the record subpoenaed and delivered to the Clerk of this Court as a
record associated with matters of elections law with willful fraud perpetrated upon
Plaintiff, and heretofore, there has not been any legal relief or remedy for Plaintiff
or anyone else in the Country either in Federal or State jurisdiction in the matter of
the usurpation of the Office of POTUS, that this is a matter of grave national
security involving high crimes outrageously ignored by Federal and State judges
despite notice of misprision of treason.
That Appellant wishes pure equity remedy herein that would include sealing
this case and issuing subpoenas and testimony for a broad solution decree under
the maxims of equity and that Appellant wishes further and different relief as the
Brief for Appeal No.: 13-06335 – Page 19 of 20
Mmhall Beil
Jacob Hildner
McGUEREWOODS LLP
1345 Avenue of the Americas, 7th Floor
New York, New k-ork 10105
(2 12) 54 8-7004
Attorneys for Defendant. Zbigniw B~ezi nski , Mark Rrrezinski, uandlm Brzezinskj
SUPEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O K
COUhrTY OF KINGS
-------"---------h---+-h+h-*--------------*----m-----.--------------
X
CHRISTOPHER-EARL STRLNK,
Plninfi,fJ Index No. 6500120 1 1
v.
NOTICE OF ENTRY
NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ET-ECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
-r----fr---"--------*-------------*---------------------------------
X
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the attached is a true copy of the Decision and Order of
the Hon. Mhur M. Schack, J,S.C., dated March 29,2013, that was entered by the County Clerk
of Kings County on April 10,20 13.
Dated: New York, New York
April 18,2013
qz$r/~/
Marsh I1 Beil
Jacob Hildner L
I345 Avenue of the Americas, 7th Floor
New York, New York I0 105
(2 E 2) 548-7004
Attorneys for Defendants
Zbignimu Brzezin~ki~ +Mark Brzezinski, and
Icrn Erzezinskl
TO:
Christopher-Earl Strunk
593 Vanderbilt Avenue, ff2&1
Brooklyn, New York 1 1238
Phintix pro se
Eric T. Schneiderman
Attorncy General of the State ofNetv York
By: Joel Grabcr
Assistant Attorney Gcneral
Special Litigalion Counsel
Litigation I31weau
I20 Broadway - 24th Floor
New York, New Ynrk 1027 1
(21 2) 416-8645
Michael Cardoto
Corporation Counsel of Ithe City of New York
By: CI~larens Orsland
Assistant Corporation Counsel
New York City Law Dcpastmcnt
1 00 Church St.
Sew York, New York 10007
(2 12) 7&8-0904
Caplin & Drysdalc, Chnrtercd
James P. Wehner
One TI~omas Circle, N W
Nrashington, D.C. 26005
(202) 862-5000
And
Eta C. Tobin
375 Park Avenue, 35h Floor
New York, Ncw York 10 152
.
(212) 319-7125
A lforneys for Defenda~is McCain Vicfory
2008, iMcCain-Palin Victory 2005, and
John S. McCain
Harris Beach, PLLC
Thomas J. B q , Esq.
Kcith M. CorbM, Esq.
The 0;MNI:
333 Fade Ovington Blvd., Suite 901
Uniondale, New York 1 1533
Attorneys for Presidenr Barack Obama,
Vice President Joseph R. Biden, Jp,,
Obarna for America, Obama Victory Fzmd,
ovld lcJnncy Pelmi
Rabinowitz, Boudin, Standard, Krinsky, &
Liebeman, P.C.
Daniel S. Rcich
Cluistopher J. Klatell
45 Broadway, Suite 1700
Ncw York, New York 10006
Allorneys for Defendants Socialis! Worke~s
Purp nnd Roger Col'ero
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Paul C. Gluckotv
Sad1 L. Durn
425 Lexington Avenue
New Yo&, New York 10017-3954
(212) 455-2000
Affomeys for Defendcrnt Perer G. Peterson
WiIZkie Fan & Gallagher
James C. Dugan
787 Seventh Avenue
New York, New Ynrk 10019
(2 12) 728-8000
Attorneys for Defendant George Soros
At an IAS Tern, Part 27 of
the Supreme Court of the
State of New York, heid in
attd for thc County of
Kings, at the Courthouse,
at Civic Center, Rrooklyn,
New York, on the 29th day
of March 2013
Justice.
CI-IRISTOPHER-EAIII, STRUA'K, in esse
hFTV YORK STATE BOARD OT: Et ECnONS;
JAMES A. RriXSIUCo-Chair, DOUGLAS A.
KE1,LNER;Co-Chair, EVE1,W J. RQULN
Commissioner, GREGORY P. PETERSON
Co~nrnissioner, Deputy Director 'TODD Q.
V.+21TdF;NTINE, Deputy Director S'TtViYLY ZAZ,EN;
ANIISREW CUOMO, ERIC SCI-NEIIIERhZAN,
'I'ROMAS P. DWAPQLI, RUT1 I NOEMI COLON,
irr thcir Omcia1 and individual capacity? FR. JOSEPH A.
QqR4RE. S.J.; FI'I. JOSEPH P. PAKKES, S.3.;
FWDESUCK A, 0. SCHWARZ. JR.; P E E R Ci.
PB'fEltS13N; ZBIGNIEW KAI h! [ERZ RRZEZINSKI ;
MARK RRZEZNSKI; JOSFPFl R. BIDEN, R.;
SOEl3AKKATI (a.k.3 Barry Soeroro Lf!@@m$744~ EIOZ
I russein Oberna, a.k.a Steve Dunlzar
r A, C
PELOS[; DE.bj.IOCmTIC STATE C O ~ ~ F E E OF?'' ' '
THE STATE OF NEW Y O N ; STATE COT\ ~ ~ %! ! ~ E
OF THE JVOWhTG FAMILIES PARTY OF N E\lf
DEClSlON & ORDER
Tr~des No, 6500/11
award to any party of ahlorney in any civil action or proceeding before the court . . . costs
in the forin or reimbursemerat fix ackllal expcnscs rc~sollakly incuficd and reasonable
attorney's fees, resultiazg from frivolous conduct as detined in this Part." Xlrr analyzing
these billing records and affictavits or aflirm:itions: the Court Grids that these fees are
reasorlable in light of Bfrc: tirnc and labor required: novelty and difficulty ofthe questions
invotved; skiill reqtrisi~c tu perform the legal se~-vices properly; performance of these
servi ~es prcclrriting ernploynlcnt of attorneys ox1 other rraattcrs; fees customarily charged
for 3imilar Begrzl services; n;itrrrc of the irrstaixt action; resrrlts obtai~ed; nature arid length
of the profession:il re ii~tiirncilips with clients: and, exgserienee, repti tation azd ability uf
attorneys and s~mppum.b btofrperfc:clmliug services. Mtlrecrver, plairntirf SSTRtmK did not
crbject to the proposed costs prese~xred to the Co i ~ t .
McGrrire, tlioods U P , counsel for dek-ndarats ZBIGNIEpJkF KAIMTERZ
UJSEZINSKI, MARK If3X$%E:%INSKT and I AN S. RRZEZINSKF bilXed defenkt~tllts
2I3IGNIK'LY KAIXLTIEItZ BRItZEZINSKT, MARK MRZEZNSKI and IAN J.
UKZEZXNSKI $7S,CiI3(1 OCI for ;ittortxcy"s fees and $1,446.74 fix disbursements, f ~+r a total
of $78,156.74, "Therehre, the Court awards to det'etldants ZBIIGNIGtV IChIMTRW,
RRZEZINSKI; MARK BR2PZINSMI arid IAN d. R=G%INSKI $78,156.74 for ""costs in
the fbrtn uf relrnbrirstnlcrit for ~CTL~; BI C X ~ ~ I I S C S rcasonclbly iancurrcd and reasonal~lc
atton~cy's fees, resullifzg from Ckolouh conctuct" ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C H N S T C ~ P H E R - B A M ,
?; X'ISIINK.