Drug Injury Watch

« Medication Mistakes And Pharmacy Errors Continue To Be A Large Problem | Main

Patient Lawsuits Against Pharmaceutical Companies For Drug Injuries Might Be Prohibited In U.S. Our Tort System Provides A Needed Means Of Accountability; Law Professor: "A lot is lost without these lawsuits."
(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) On March 3, 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in the Warner-Lambert v. Kent case and, in so doing, declined the invitation of pharmaceutical companies - and the Bush administration -- to prohibit drug injury lawsuits from being filed by patients who have suffered serious side effects caused by unsafe prescription drugs. The tie vote by which the Supreme Court arrived at its decision in Warner-Lambert v. Kent, however, means that this ruling does not set any precedent on the federal preemption issue that is the increasing focus of products liability lawsuits that involve FDA-approved prescription drugs and medical devices. From the March 4, 2008 article, "Court Allows Suit Against Drug Maker", by New York Times reporter Linda Greenhouse: This case, Warner-Lambert Co. v. Kent, presented a narrow slice of the broad pre-emption issue that the court will take up in its next term. In that new case, Wyeth v. Levine, the question is whether the Food and Drug Administration’s approval of a drug’s label precludes individual damage suits based on the claim that the label failed to include sufficient information or adequate warnings. In essence, if the answer is yes, most individual lawsuits for damages caused by approved drugs would be pre-empted. Last month, in Riegel v. Medtronic Inc., the court interpreted a federal law, the Medical Device Amendments, as barring most individual lawsuits against manufacturers of approved medical devices.... The Bush administration, which has embraced a broad theory of federal pre-emption of individual tort suits, entered the case on the manufacturer’s behalf. It argued that “permitting lay juries to secondguess” the adequacy of a drug application would interfere with the agency’s “exercise of its expert judgment.” In more detail, the Bush administration will be arguing in Wyeth v. Levine (No. 061294) that the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938 -- under which the FDA regulates prescription drugs -- has "implied preemption" due to the structure of this

statute, i.e., the law's text does not include any preemption clause. The Levine case involves a Vermont woman who lost a hand and forearm to gangrene after being improperly injected with the drug Phenergan. At the trial of this lawsuit, Wyeth argued that its drug had met FDA labeling requirements and, accordingly, the drug company should face no liability under state law. The trial court judge disagreed, and the jury in that case awarded $6.8 million in legal compensation to Levine for her injury. According to some critics, federal preemption of drug injury cases may have some merit in an ideal world where the FDA was performing its drug-safety regulatory functions at 100%. But that has not been the situation in the past, nor is it the case today. In his March 3, 2008 article, "Patients' ability to sue at risk", Los Angeles Times reporter Daniel Costello presented these facts which tend to show why federal preemption of drug injury cases is a bad idea: The FDA "doesn't have the ability at this time to oversee in a comprehensive fashion everything it regulates," said David A. Kessler, a former FDA chief and a professor at UC San Francisco. A trio of recent reports, including one by the FDA's own advisory committee, has raised serious questions about the agency's recent performance. Last fall a yearlong study by the FDA's advisory committee found "the agency is so underfunded and understaffed that it's putting U.S. consumers at risk in terms of food and drug safety." In an unusual public departure from the view of the Bush administration, the current FDA commissioner, Andrew C. von Eschenbach, said in an interview last week that the agency needed a systemic overhaul that could take years.... Some legal experts and attorneys are concerned that without such lawsuits, regulators and the public may never hear of evidence that manufacturers knowingly marketed products they knew were unsafe. In recent years, documents and e-mails uncovered in court cases have shown that some companies kept safety issues involving their products from the FDA. "Without the tort system, what reasonable assurance do we have we will learn about the bad actors?" asked David Vladek [sic], a law professor at Georgetown University. "A lot is lost without these lawsuits." Oral arguments in the Levine case are scheduled for October 2008. Sometime thereafter the Supreme Court will decide whether FDA approval of a prescription

drug prohibits the filing of personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits against drug companies. No doubt we will continue to hear a lot about this important policy issue in the months to come. P.S. Dr. David A. Kessler, Dean and Vice Chancellor for Medical Affairs at the University of California San Francisco and former FDA Commissioner, and David C. Vladeck, Professor of Law at Georgetown University Law Center, explore the legality and wisdom of this continuing effort by the FDA and the Bush administration to persuade lower courts, including the Supreme Court, to preempt most failure-to-warn claims asserted by patients against drug companies in this recent law review article: David A. Kessler & David C. Vladeck, A Critical Examination of the FDA’s Efforts To Preempt Failure-To-Warn Claims, 96 GEO. L.J. 461 (2008). Dean Kessler and Professor Vladeck explain how the FDA’s position, if ultimately adopted by the Supreme Court, would effectively eliminate a significant incentive for the drug company to ensure that its drug labels reflect accurate and up-to-date safety information, i.e., the possibility of failure-to-warn product liability litigation. The authors explain, also, why the FDA’s view that the agency, alone, is capable of regulating the safety of prescription drugs in the U.S. is unrealistic. This 35-page scholarly article is compelling and insightful as to why federal preemption of drug injury cases is a bad idea. (3/5/08) March 04, 2008 in FDA Drug Safety Oversight, Legal Case Updates, Patient Resources, Pharma Industry Trends | Permalink

TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/369531/26756560 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Patient Lawsuits Against Pharmaceutical Companies For Drug Injuries Might Be Prohibited In U.S.:

Comments

Post a comment
Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them. Name: Email Address: (Not displayed with comment.)

URL: Remember personal info?

Comments:
Preview Post

About Interviewed By ClinPage
"Drug Safety: A Lawyer’s View" (03/05/08)

Email Delivery
Enter your Email
Subscribe me!

Powered by FeedBlitz

RSS Feed
FeedBurner

Bookmarking

Featured On

Recent Posts
Patient Lawsuits Against Pharmaceutical Companies For Drug Injuries Might Be Prohibited In U.S. Medication Mistakes And Pharmacy Errors Continue To Be A Large Problem FDA Proposed Rule About Drug Label Warning Changes Will Lessen Agency's Power To Protect Us Dr. Dennis Mangano Says On 60 Minutes In February 2008 That Trasylol Should Have Been Recalled As Early As January 2006 February 2008 "Dear Doctor" Letter About Avelox / Avalox Is Sent By Bayer In Europe More Reports Of Serious Blood Clots In Women Using Birth Control Patch Or Vaginal Ring Oral Anti-Fungal Lamisil Associated With Liver Failure And Other Hepatic Adverse Reactions Debate Over Whether Zetia And Vytorin Are, In Fact, Effective Overshadows The Side Effects Of These Drugs

Sponsored By
DrugInjuryLaw.com

Thomas J. Lamb, P.A. Lumina Station, Suite 225 1908 Eastwood Road Wilmington, NC 28403 A-V Rated Attorney / Firm

Drug Lawsuits

Vytorin (ezetimibe / simvastatin) Zetia (ezetimibe) NuvaRing (ethinyl estradiol / etonogestrel ring) Avandia (rosiglitazone) Zelnorm (tegaserod) Permax (pergolide) Dostinex (cabergoline) Ketek (telithromycin) Ortho Evra (ethinyl estradiol / norelgestromin patch) Fosamax (alendronate) Tequin (gatifloxacin) Natrecor (nesiritide) Bextra (valdecoxib) Vioxx (rofecoxib) Crestor (rosuvastatin)

Case Review
Free Case Evaluation

Resources
Drug Interaction Checker Program alerts patients to some drug-drug interaction possibilities when taking two or more prescription drugs. FDA MedWatch MedWatch is the U.S. FDA site for safety information on prescription drugs and other medical products. Health Canada MedEffect Health Canada's MedEffect site provides drug product safety announcements and other information for patients. Medication Errors Reporting Program (MERP) Submit a confidential report to national voluntary program. NIH MedlinePlus MedlinePlus will direct you to information that will help answer health questions. PDRhealth.com Based on most trusted database of prescription drug information, Physicians’ Desk Reference. Patient Medical Records Copying Cost Statutes State statutes that control what amount can be charged when patient requests their own medical records in U.S. PharmedOut Intended to help prescribers identify and counter inappropriate pharmaceutical promotion practices.

Custom Feeds

Sites to See
ClinPage Online resource for clinical trial outsourcing and technology news. Drug and Device Law Topics related to the defense of pharmaceutical drug and medical device litigation. FDA Law Blog Intended primarily for healthcare attorneys and regulatory professionals. GoozNews News from Merrill Goozner, journalist/author/researcher. Hooked: Ethics, Medicine, and Pharma Commentary by Dr. Brody about what goes on between doctors and Big Pharma. Medical Devices: Law, Trends and Oddities A forum for those interested in medical device litigation. Pharma Marketing Blog John Mack, of Pharma Marketing News, gives his personal opinions. PharmaGossip Looking beyond the spin of Big Pharma PR, but encouraging gossip. Pharmaceutical News Harvest / CoreyNahman.com Pharmaceutical news and information, updated daily. Pharmalot Pharmaceutical industry news and trends from journalist Ed Silverstein. Scientific Misconduct Ramblings about corporate scientific misconduct, by Aubrey Blumsohn. World Pharma News Read the latest worldwide pharmaceutical news.

Search Engine

WWW www.drug-injury.com
Google Search

Law Blogs
North Carolina Trial Law: Chris Nichols South Carolina Trial Law: David Swanner New York Personal Injury Attorney: Eric Turkewitz Kansas Family and Divorce Lawyer: Grant Griffiths Texas Personal Injury and SSA Disability: Bob Kraft Tampa Bay Personal Injury Lawyer: Bob Carroll Inter Alia / Internet Legal Research: Tom Mighell California Personal Injury and Insurance: Jonathan Stein

Let Us Know

Email Me

Blawg Lists
ABA Blawg Directory Blawg.com BlawgSearch.com Legal Blog Directory

Affiliations

Use RSS Feed
FeedBurner

What Is RSS?
Read A Beginner's Guide To Really Simple Syndication

Blog Archives
Drug Injury Watch Archives Find past blog articles by date or subject category.

Categories
"Dear Doctor" Letters Drug Recall Notices Drug Safety Alerts Drug-Drug Interactions FDA Drug Safety Oversight Health Canada News Legal Case Updates Medication Errors Off-label Use / Prescribing Patient Resources Pharma Industry Trends Pharmacy Mistakes Side Effect: Birth Defects (abnormality, congenital malformation) Side Effect: Blood-sugar Disorders (diabetes, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia) Side Effect: Bone Disease (osteonecrosis, osteomyelitis) Side Effect: Cardiovascular (heart attack, stroke, heart valve damage) Side Effect: Gastrointestinal (acute gastrointestinal bleeding) Side Effect: Infections (necrotizing fasciitis, sepsis) Side Effect: Kidney Injury (acute renal failure, kidney transplant) Side Effect: Liver Failure (hepatitis, acute liver failure, liver transplant) Side Effect: Rhabdomyolysis (severe muscle breakdown / toxicity) Side Effect: Skin Reaction (Stevens Johnson Syndrome, Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis) Side Effect: Vision - Optical (blindness, sudden vision loss, NAION)

Disclaimer
DRUG INJURY WATCH is for general information purposes only, and should not be regarded as medical advice or legal advice.... (For more, please see the About page.) Subscribe to this blog's feed

See how we're connected

See You Again