This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Pros ka u er» Progkauer Ro88 LLP El111en l'lmaa s
l I DOC"tJJ!F.!\1T
Bradley I. Rur;kln
Member of the Firm
May 12, 2014 li FILED
Honorable Shira A. Schein , in .. :..": 0J 7··
United States District Court- ·
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street
New York, NY 10007
Re: Garber, et al. v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, et al,, 12-CIV-3704 (SAS)
Laumann, crt al. y, National Hoc)<ey League, et aL, 12-CV-1817 (SAS)
Dear Judge Scheindlin:
On behalf of all defendants in the above actions, we submit this letter pursuant to the directive
the Court issued during the May 8, 2014 telephonic court conference.
As discussed during the conference, defendants' April 8 submissions complied with the limits set
by the Court's March 27, 2014 Order and the Court's Individual Practices. In accordance with
the Court's direction, the defendants have now reviewed their submissions and further
streamlined the declarations and exhibits. The resulting reductions reduce the total pages of
supporting materials by approximately 40% for the defendants' six sturunary judgment motions.
The foregoing reflects the efforts of the defendants to reduce the overall volume of the
submissions while still providing the Court with important docwnentation that defendants
believe will facilitate the Court's analysis of the issues presented in the defendants' six. motions.
If the foregoing is acceptable to the Cou1t, the defendants are r ared to re-file their motions
five (5) business days fromH e ate the Court So Orders this letter or __ _
otherwise approves As discussed duiing the May 8 conference, defendants will
Withdraw the existing submissions upon filing the revised submissions.
We ask that Plaintiffs' opposition papers be due five (S) business days after defendants re-file as
none of the defendants' arguments made in 2014 changed:- --
8oca R•ton I BostDn I Chloego I Hong Kong I London I Los AngelH I New Orlean• I New York I Nawark I Paris I Siio Paulo I Wa9hh111lon, D.C.
Case 1:12-cv-03704-SAS-MHD Document 268 Filed 05/12/14 Page 1 of 2
05/12/201'1 MON 15: 58 FAX
Honorable Shira A. Scheindlin
May 12, 2014
Defendants' reply papers would be due 28 calendar days after the opposition is filed, the period
provided under the current schedule.
Bradley I. Ruskin
cc by email: Counsel for all parties
Case 1:12-cv-03704-SAS-MHD Document 268 Filed 05/12/14 Page 2 of 2