What is a License?

Here's One!
The Definition a License is "A personal privilege to do some particular act or s
eries of acts on Land without possessing any estate or interest therein", and is
ordinarily revocable at the will of the licensor and is NOT assignable. The per
mission by competent authority to do an act which, without such permission, woul
d be illegal TOTALLY or, a trespass, a tort, a clear violation of LAW and/or oth
erwise totally NOT ALLOWABLE UNDER ANY CONDITION!!! See People vs. Henderson, 39
1 Mich. 612, 218 N.W. 2nd 2 @4. A permit granted by an appropriate governmental
body, generally for a consideration, A FEE, to a person, firm, or Corporation to
pursue some occupation or to carry on some business subject to regulation under
the POLICE POWER of Government. Please see 9th & 10th Amendments of THE U.S. CO
NSTITUTION. Pay special attention to the phrase "nor prohibited by it" or Rights
previously guaranteed may not be enumerated away by addition onto the CONSTITUT
ION, or denied or disparaged away by adding onto it.
Now let us take a look at the following cartoon and see if you can pick out the
Characters and who they actually represent in society today. It really has not c
hanged much in 2,000 years but the names and the faces are changed and maybe the
dress but the peasant/master relationship is the same. Now just how does that o
ccur? IT OCCURS BECAUSE WE VOLUNTARILY ALLOW IT TO OCCUR!!! FACT!!!!!!!
Now once upon a time in a Land far, far, away, IN THE NEW WORLD, there lived a p
eople, who were ALL Kings and or Queens in their OWN RIGHT. Now as such they wer
e truly blessed by GOD with Sovereign Rights, as FREE MEN AND WOMEN, which they
all agreed should be written down on paper to preserve for ALL TIME, that Sovere
ign STATUS and ALL THE RIGHTS to be protected. The Sovereign People, Kings and Q
ueens, called the Document THE CONSTITUTION so ALL could see and know what was i
n fact done. The Kings and Queens hired trusted servants, ALL SWORN AND TRUE, TO
ACT AS PROTECTORS OF THE CONSTITUTION. These FIDUCIARY TRUSTEES were to form a
group of FIDUCIARY TRUSTEES, and were then SWORN TO PROTECT AND SERVE, and this
was called THE GOVERNMENT, which was created entirely under the authority of THE
CONSTITUTION. Now take NOTE OF WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THAT HONEST AND NOBEL UNDER
TAKING!!! Now follow along and learn how you can bring back that original CONTRA
CT, and get back your Sovereign Status and the PROTECTED RIGHTS GUARANTEED TO YO
U IN THAT CONSTITUTION. CAN YOU PICK OUT THE CHARACTERS IN THIS LITTLE CARTOON??
? What Changed????!!! HOW DID IT HAPPEN??????!!! HOW did the Sovereign Citizen's
protected RIGHTS GET CONVERTED INTO A PRIVILEGE and a requirement for a LICENSE
or FEE for the exercise of that RIGHT be required for the exercise of that PRIV
ILEGE? CLEARLY THIS IS FRAUD, PLAIN AND SIMPLE. FRAUD VISCHEATES THE MOST SACred
CONTRACT OR COVENANT! !!!! Has a FRAUD been done here???? You DECIDE!!!
Now NO STATE may convert a RIGHT into a PRIVILEGE and require a LICENSE or FEE f
or the exercise of that RIGHT!!! Please see MURDOCK vs. PENNSYLVANIA, 319 U.S. 1
05, and if a STATE does erroneously do require A LICENSE OR FEE for exercise of
the RIGHT, the Citizen may IGNORE THE LICENSE AND OR FEE and exercise the RIGHT
WITH TOTAL IMPUNITY!!! Please see SCHUTTLESWORTH vs. BIRMINGHAM 373 U.S. 262. YO
U CAN NOT BE PUNISHED FOR THE EXERCISE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT!!! Please see M
ILLER vs. UNITED STATES 230 F2nd 486. You have a PERFECT DEFENSE TO THE ELEMENT
OF WILLFULLNESS if you rely on the advice of Counsel or upon a DECISION OF THE U
NITED STATES SUPREME COURT AS A DEFENSE. Please see U.S. vs. BISHOP, 412 U.S. 34
6. If the Prosecution who bears entirely the proofs beyond a TOTAL REASONABLE DO
UBT can NOT prove WILLFUL INTENT TO AVOID AND KNOWN DUTY OR TASK UNDER THE LAW W
ITH A MORAL CERTAINTY, said Prosecutor does NOT HAVE A CAUSE OF ACTION FOR WHICH
A COURT OF LAW MAY GRANT RELIEF TO HIM/HER, and thereby has NO CASE AT LAW!!!!
FACT!!!!! See Michigan Court Rule 2.116 (c) (8) FAILURE TO STATE A CAUSE OF ACTI
ON FOR WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED BY THE COURT.
Now look below, because this is exactly what is going on and you need to study t
his example and decide if you are willing to go along with this FRAUD!!!!!!!!! Y
ES OR NO!!!! You think about it and make your decision, and the decision is: TO
BE OR NOT TO BE KING OR QUEEN WITH ALL RIGHTS AND OR PROTECTIONS THAT GO WITH TH
AT!!! The Constitution is suppose to be interpreted in favor of YOU, "THE CITIZE
N" BENEFICIARY, FOR THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS AND PROPERTY!!!! Please see BYARS v
s. UNITED STATES 273 U.S. 28 and 16th Am Juris Prudence 2nd Constitutional Secti
on #97, so you got a right to have your idea or opinion of your Rights be protec
ted in favor of YOU!!!! BUT FIRST YOU MUST KNOW YOUR RIGHTS!!! Do You know your
RIGHTS??????? HOW THEN CAN YOU PROTECT THEM IF YOU DON'T KNOW THEM, SURELY GOVER
NMENT IS NOT GOING TO TELL YOU WHAT YOUR RIGHTS ARE!!!! NO IT IS ENTIRELY UP TO
YOU!!!! You must decide!
Constitutional Drivers License
County of______________
OFFICE OF THE CLERIC
______________ , Michigan
COMMON LAW VEHICULAR JUDICIAL NOTICE
CONSTITUTIONAL DRIVERS LICENSE
THE UNDERSIGNED Common Law Citizen John-Henry Doe, a man, do hereby Certify, by
Rights Secured under provisions of the Constitution of the United States of Amer
ica, the Constitution of the several states, Common Law, Nature and Laws of Natu
re, that these Rights are retained in FEE SIMPLE ABSOLUTE, and held and protecte
d with special regard to Rights designated and/or set forth as follows: ALSO NOT
E, Rights and Property are ONE AND THE SAME THING --the Honorable Justice LOUIS
BRANDIS U.S. SUPREME COURT.
NOTICE AND ADVISORY OF RIGHTS CLAIMED INVIOLATE:
1) The Right to TRAVEL FREELY, UNENCUMBEred, and UNFETTEred is guaranteed as a R
IGHT and not a mere privilege. That the Right to TRAVEL is such a BASIC RIGHT it
does NOT even need to be mentioned for it is SELF-evident by Common Sense that
the Right to TRAVEL is a BASIC CONCOMMITANT of a FREE Society to come and go fro
m length and breath FREELY UNENCUMBEred and UNFETTEred distinguishes the charact
eristic required for a FREE PEOPLE TO EXIST IN FACT. Please see SHAPIRO vs. THOM
SON, 394 U. S. 618. Further, the Right to TRAVEL by private conveyance for priva
te purposes upon the Common way can NOT BE INFRINGED. No license or permission i
s required for TRAVEL when such TRAVEL IS NOT for the purpose of [COMMERCIAL] PR
OFIT OR GAIN on the open highways operating under license IN COMMERCE.
The above named Common Law Citizen listed IS NOT OPERATING IN COMMERCE and as su
ch is thereby EXEMPTED FROM THE REQUIREMENT OF A LICENSE AS SUCH. Further, the _
______________ state, is FORBIDDEN BY LAW from converting a BASIC RIGHT into a P
RIVILEGE and requiring a LICENSE and or a FEE CHARGED for the exercise of the BA
SIC RIGHT. Please SEE MURDOCK vs. PENNSYLVANIA, 319 U.S. 105, and if ___________
____ state does ERRONIOUSLY convert BASIC RIGHTS into PRIVILEGES and require a L
icense or FEE a Citizen may IGNORE THE LICENSE OR FEE WITH TOTAL IMMUNITY FOR SU
CH EXERCISE OF A BASIC RIGHT. Please see Schuttlesworth vs. BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA,
373 U.S.262. Now if a Citizen exercises a BASIC RIGHT and a Law of ANY state is
to the contrary of such exercise of that BASIC RIGHT, the said supposed Law of
ANY state is a FICTION OF LAW and 100% TOTALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL and NO COURTS AR
E BOUND TO UPHOLD IT AND NO Citizen is REQUIred TO OBEY SUCH UNCONSTITUTIONAL LA
W OR LICENSE REQUIREMENT.
Please see MARBURY vs. MADISON, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), which has never been overturn
ed in over 194 years, see Shephard's Citations. Now further, if a Citizen relies
in good faith on the advice of Counsel and or on the Decisions of the UNITED ST
ATES SUPREME COURT that Citizen has a PERFECT DEFENSE to the element of WILLFULN
ESS and since the burden of proof of said WILLFULNESS is on the Prosecution to p
rove beyond a REASONABLE DOUBT, said task or burden being totally impossible to
specifically perform there is NO CAUSE OF ACTION FOR WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED
BY A COURT OF LAW. Please see U.S. vs. Bishop 412 U.S. 346. OBVIOUSLY THERE IS
NO LAWFUL CHARGE AGAINST EXERCISING A BASIC Right to TRAVEL for a regular Common
Law Citizen NOT IN COMMERCE on the common way Public HlGHWAY. THAT IS THE LAW!!
! The above named Citizen IS IMMUNE FROM ANY CHARGE TO THE CONTRARY AND ANY PART
Y MAKING SUCH CHARGE SHOULD BE DULY WARNED OF THE TORT OF TRESPASS!!! YOU ARE TR
ESPASSING ON THIS Common Law Citizen!
2) The original and Judicial jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court is
ALL actions in which a State may be party, thru subdivision, political or trust.
This includes ALL state approved subdivisions and/or INCORPORATED Cities, Towns
hips, Municipalities, and Villages, Et Al. Please see Article 3, Section 2, Para
. (1) and (2), U.S. Constitution.
3) The undersigned has NEVER willingly and knowingly entered into ANY Contract o
r Contractual agreement giving up ANY Constitutional Rights which are secured by
the CONSTITUTION, the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. This Common Law Citizen has NOT
harmed any party, has NOT threatened any party, and that includes has NOT threat
ened or caused any endangerment to the safety or well being of any party and wou
ld leave any claimant otherwise to their strictest proofs otherwise IN A COURT O
F LAW. The above named Citizen is merely exercising the BASIC RIGHT TO TRAVEL UN
ENCUMBEred and UNFETTEred on the Common public way or highway, which is their RI
GHT TO SO DO!!! Please see Zobel vs. Williams, 457 U.S. 55, held the RIGHT TO TR
AVEL is Constitutionally PROTECTED!
4) Conversion of the RIGHT TO TRAVEL into a PRIVILEGE and or CRIME is A FRAUD an
d is in clear and direct conflict with she UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, THE SUPRE
ME LAW OF THE LAND. LAWS made by any state, which are clearly in direct CONFLICT
or REPUGNANCY are UNCONSTITUTIONAL and are NOT WITH STANDING IN LAW AND ARE BEI
NG CHALLENGED AS SUCH HERE AND THEREBY ARE NULL AND VOID OF LAW ON THEIR FACE. N
O COURTS ARE BOUND TO UPHOLD SUCH FICTIONS OF LAW AND NO Citizen is bound to obe
y such a FICTION OF LAW. SUCH REGULATION OR LAW OPERATES AS A MERE NULLITY OR FI
CTION OF LAW AS IF IT NEVER EXISTED IN LAW. No CITIZEN IS BOUND TO OBEY SUCH UNC
ONSTITUTIONAL LAW!!!!!
5) The payment for a privilege requires a benefit to be received As the RIGHT TO
TRAVEL is already secured it is clearly unlawful to cite any charges without di
rect damage to the specific party. Nor may a Citizen be charged with an offense
for the exercise of a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, in this case the RIGHT TO TRAVEL. Pl
ease see Miller vs. UNITED STATES 230 F2d 486 . Nor may a Citizen be denied DUE
PROCESS OF LAW or EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW.
6) The undersigned does hereby claim, declare, and certify ANY AND ALL their CON
STITUTIONAL RIGHTS INVIOLATE from GOD and secured in THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUT
ION and the CONSTITUTION OF THE state wherein they abode as a SOVEREIGN, COMMON
LAW CITIZEN existing and acting entirely AT THE COMMON LAW, and retains ALL BASI
C RIGHTS under the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATURE AND NATU
RE'S GOD AND UNDER THE LAWS OF GOD THE SUPREME LAW GIVER.
7) ANY VIOLATOR OF THE ABOVE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND CLAIM IS CRIMINALLY TRESPAS
SING UPON THIS ABOVE NAMED COMMON LAW Citizen and WILL BE PROSECUTED TO THE FULL
EST EXTENT UNDER THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. BE WARNED OF THE TRESPASS AND THE
ATTACHED CAVEATS. ALSO TAKE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE; IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NOT AN
EXCUSE!
SIGNATURE OF THE ABOVE NOTED Common Law Citizen is
signed_________________________________________
WITNESS________________________________________ Date_______________
WITNESS________________________________________ Date_______________
or
NOTARY PUBLIC_________________________________ MY COMMISSION
EXPIRES____________________________
---------------------------------
Form below use for County Clerk
State: Texas
County: _______________
I, _________________________, CLERK of the County of ___________________________
________, thereof do hereby certify the Citizen above named has sworn to the con
tents of this document and that same is TRUE AND CORRECT.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereto set my hand and affixed the SEAL of said CIR
CUIT COURT, at the City of __________________________________ , MICHIGAN
this ________________day of_______________________, AD.__________
____________________________Deputy County Clerk for__________________
_____________________________COUNTY CLERK
NOTICE: If anything in this presentation is found to be in error a good faith ef
fort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification.
Specialty Areas
NOTICE: The information on this page was brought to you by people who paid this
website forward so that someone such as you might also profit by having access t
o it. If you care to do so also please feel encouraged to KEEP THIS SITE GOING b
y making a donation today. Thank you. Make donation with PayPal - it's fast, f
ree and secure!
Freedom School is not affiliated with the links on this page - unless otherwise
stated.
Freedom School information served for educational purposes only, no liability as
sumed for use.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal
advice.
Freedom School does not consent to unlawful action. Freedom School advocates and
encourages one and all to adhere to, support and defend all law which is partic
ularly applicable.
The noteworthy failure of the government or any alleged agency thereof to at any
time rebut anything appearing on this website constitutes a legal admission of
the fidelity and accuracy of the materials presented, which are offered in good
faith and prepared as such by Freedom School and third parties affiliated or oth
erwise. If the government wants to assert that any of the religious and/or polit
ical statements that are not factual appearing on this website are in error, the
n they as the moving party have the burden of proof, and they must responsively
meet that burden of proof under the Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. §556(d)
and under the due process clauses found in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendm
ents to the national Constitution BEFORE there will be response to any summons,
questions, or unsubstantiated and slanderous accusations. Attempts at calling pr
esented claims "frivolous" without specifically rebutting the particular claim,
or claims, deemed "frivolous" will be in deed be "frivolous" and prima facie evi
dence that shall be used accordingly. Hey guys, if anything on this site is foun
d to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashio
n upon notification.
Presentation Copyright© 2007, 2012
All Rights Reserved
H O M E

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful