mektan 2

© All Rights Reserved

92 views

mektan 2

© All Rights Reserved

- c 0331621
- Geotecnical Depth Set 2
- The Ultimate Uplift Capacity of Foundations
- Laboratory Testing for Soft Rock
- Metodos
- Soil
- GE500101
- Gue & Partner Geotechnical 5
- 3-1-483
- An integrated model simulating the initation and motion of earthquake and rain induced rapid landslides and its applicatin to the 2006 Leyte landslide.pdf
- Compaction Grout 1
- Hill Site Development
- 1965 Newmark - Earthquakes on Dams and Embankments
- Behaviour of Interfaces Between Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer and Gravel Soils
- Analysis of Self-boring Pressuremeter Tests in Overconsolidated Clays
- 201006 s
- G 10101
- Korelasi CPT dan SPT
- Shear Strength Reduction at Soil Structure Interface
- Influence of Vane Size and Equipment on the Results in the Vane Shear Test

You are on page 1of 11

MODULE 11

DIRECT SHEAR TEST

INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM GROUP

Adam Yuta Prayoga 1206292370

Asti Diar Safitri 1206292414

Nathan 1206292420

Date of Practicum : 4/5/2014

Practicum Assistant :

Date of Approval :

Score :

Assistants Signature :

SOIL TESTING LABORATORY

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING

UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA

DEPOK

2014

2

Universitas Indonesia

11.1. Introduction:

11.1.1. Objective:

To determine the value of the cohesion (c) and the angle of shear

(), and the water content of a soil sample.

11.1.2. Apparatus:

Direct shear test apparatus and shear box

Weight (5kg, 10kg, 15kg, 20kg, 25kg)

2 dial gauges for vertical and horizontal displacement

Specimen cutter for cutting cohesive soil

Tamper to compact cohesionless soil

Scale with an accuracy of 0.01 gr

Calipers with an accuracy of 0.01mm

Stopwatch

Can

Oven

11.1.3. Basic Theorem:

The shear strength of the soil sample can be measured directly by a

constant vertical (normal) loading on the sample and an addition of a

certain amount of shear force with a constant, slow rate to keep the pore

water pressure at zero, so the ultimate shear strength can be determined.

The normal stress can be determined by a division of the amount of

normal force and the shear-plane area or S= P/A

The shear stress can be determined by calculating the shear force

(G), which is gained from the maximum reading of the load ring dial after

being multiplied by the value of prooving ring calibration (LRC)

3

Universitas Indonesia

In some reference books, it is stated that the cohesion of sand is (c)

= 0, and the shear angle () of sands ranging from 28

o

to 48

o

. The table

below is used to classify the type of soil using the value of shear angle:

Table 11.1.3.1 The value of shear angle for some types of soil

11.2. Procedure:

11.2.1. Preparations

a. Measure the inner diameter of the cylinder in the shear box.

b. Balance the counterweight system so it is able to provide normal force

on the shear box.

c. Weight of the shear boxs cap, the shear box ball and the can.

d. Prepare the sands. Clean the sand from any kinds of impurities or

gravels by using sieve no. 18 ASTM.

e. Take a small portion of the sand, weight it and oven-dry it in order to

seek for the water content.

11.2.2. Practical Activity:

a. Insert the sand into the shear box. Fill part of the shear box with

sands, compact it with 15 tamper blows for each part is fulfilled. Do

not forget to put a lock on the shear box to prevent any translation.

4

Universitas Indonesia

b. The surface of the sand should be flattened by using spatula or tamper.

The surface is then covered by the shear boxs cover and its ball.

c. Put the shear box in the apparatus, apply 5kg of loading, then release

the shear boxs key.

d. Set both of the horizontal and loading ring dials into 0

e. The shear box is given a shear force by applying the force in 1

mm/minute.

f. The horizontal dial readings should be read every 15 seconds until the

loading dial stop turning.

g. Repeat step a-f for the loading of 10, 15, 20, and 25 kg.

11.3. Data Tabulation

Properties:

Diameter of the shear box = 6.315 cm

Sample Area = 31.321 cm

2

Loading rate = 1mm/min

LRC = 0.15 kg/div

Weight of cap and ball = 0.84215 kg

Water Content = 16.492%

Table 11.3.1 Data Tabulation

Time (s)

Vertical Load (kg)

5 10 15 20 25 30

15 26 45 48 68 107 96

30 29 63 62 82 121 121

45 31 70 72 94 129 133

60 33 75 80 101 138 144

75 34 77 87 110 143 150

90 34 77 91 112 148 157

105 34 78 93 114 152 159

120 78 99.5 118 154 162

135 78 110 120 154 170

150 110 124 156 172

165 110 126 156 176

180 126 158 176

195 126 158 179

5

Universitas Indonesia

210 158 180

225 180

240 180

11.4 Data Processing

These are how to calculate the normal stress and shear stress from the data

gained from the direct shear test. The results are input in a table to ease the result

reading.

Normal Stress ()

Vertical load = 10 kg

Total load = 10.84215 kg

Area of sample = 31.321 cm

2

Shear Stress ()

Max Horizontal Dial Reading = 78

6

Universitas Indonesia

Table 11.4.1 Calcuation Results

Table 11.4.2 Shear Stress and Normal Stress

y = 0.8451x + 0.0526

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

S

h

e

a

r

S

t

r

e

s

s

(

K

g

/

c

m

2

)

(

)

Normal Stress (Kg/cm2) ()

vs Graph

Vertical Load 5 10 15 20 25 30

Cap & Ball Load

(Kg) 0.84215 0.84215 0.84215 0.84215 0.84215 0.84215

Total Load (Kg) 5.84215 10.84215 15.84215 20.84215 25.84215 30.84215

Sample Area

(cm2) 31.321 31.321 31.321 31.321 31.321 31.321

Normal Stress

(Kg/cm2) 0.186525 0.346162 0.5058 0.665437 0.825074 0.984712

Max Horizontal

Dial Reading 34 78 110 126 158 180

Horizontal Shear

Force (Kg) 5.1 11.7 16.5 18.9 23.7 27

Horizontal Shear

Stress (Kg) 0.16283 0.373551 0.526803 0.603429 0.756681 0.862041

7

Universitas Indonesia

Table 11.4.3 Linear Regression

X Y X2 Y2 XY

0.186525 0.16283 0.034792 0.026514 0.030372

0.346162 0.373551 0.119828 0.139541 0.129309

0.5058 0.526803 0.255833 0.277522 0.266457

0.665437 0.603429 0.442806 0.364127 0.401544

0.825074 0.756681 0.680747 0.572566 0.624318

0.984712 0.862041 0.969657 0.743115 0.711248

3.51371 3.285335 2.503663 2.123385 2.163248

Kg/cm

2

= tan

-1

(m)

= 40.201

o

11.5 Analysis

11.5.1 Procedure Analysis

The objective of this experiment is to determine the value of the

cohesion (c) and the angle of shear (), and the water content of a soil

sample. To do this experiment several apparatus and steps are required.

The main apparatus used in this experiment is direct shear test

apparatus and shear box. Another apparatus needed are weight (5kg, 10kg,

15kg, 20kg, 25kg), 2 dial gauges for vertical and horizontal displacement,

specimen cutter for cutting cohesive soil, tamper to compact cohesionless

soil, scale with an accuracy of 0.01 gr, calipers with an accuracy of

0.01mm, stopwatch, can, and oven. All the apparatus are provided in soil

testing laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering UI.

First thing to do is sieving the sample of soil, which is going to be

tested. To sieve the sample, students use sieve no. 18 ASTM. Fine grains

8

Universitas Indonesia

of soil are preferable due to their homogenous properties that lead to more

accurate results. Fine grains will give more accurate results because the

stress will be disturbed properly. The sample must be added by several

amount of water in order to ease the compaction process. The can used as

the container of the sample of soil also must be weighted to determine the

water content.

The next step is measuring the diameter of the shear box. Students

only measure the internal diameter because the internal diameter is used in

determining the surface of the sample of soil. After that, students weight

the cap and the ball that also act as the load acting on the sample of soil in

the direct shear test.

The last step of preparation is soil compaction. To prevent the

sample of soil from moving two keys must fastened. The filling process

must be conducted with several compactions. Every soil addition of 1/3

part of the shear box must be compacted by 15 times with constant

strength. This step is repeated until the volume has reached of the shear

box, which is signed by a dot sign inside the shear box. After the sample is

compacted, place the cap and the ball on it. In placing the cap, the pattern

of the cap must be the same with the pattern that is located at the bottom of

the shear box. This is done in order to make sure the shear stress is well

distributed.

After all the preparation steps are finished, the experiment is

started. The first thing to do is placing the shear box that contains of the

sample to the direct shear apparatus. This step must be done carefully, to

prevent the soil translation that may damage the soil structure. After being

placed, remove the key and set the dial to zero as the starting point. In the

loading process, students should make sure the ball, which is used to

distribute the load, touches the curvature. The direct shear test apparatus is

used manually; therefore the students have to maintain the translation rate

of 1mm/min properly in order to prevent error data. Students use

stopwatch and the dial to keep the constant translation rate. This is done to

prevent early failure. The horizontal dial reading is done every 15 seconds

9

Universitas Indonesia

until the loading dial stop turning. These steps are repeated for weight of

10, 15, 20, 25 , and 30 kg.

11.5.2 Result Analysis

As we know the cohesion and shear angle are two factors that

influences the value of shear strength. The relation between the two factors

and the shear strength is shown in equation below:

where is the shear strength, c is the cohesion, shear stress, and

is the shear angle. From this equation, we know that the shear strength

increases while the shear angle and the cohesion also increase.

In the reading process, the shear strength gauge shows the high

increasing value of strength. However, after the direct shear test apparatus

being turned constantly, the gauge shows the small increasing value of

shear strength. The test is still continued until the shear strength gauge

shows the 3 (three) the same value. These values represent that the soil has

reached its maximum shear strength.

In the experiment, the direct shear test is conducted 6 (six) times

with different weight (5,10, 15, 20, 25, 30 kg). From the table 11.3.1, we

can see that the gauge shows bigger value in soil in more loaded condition.

For example, in the weight of 5 kg, the maximum shear strength is reached

when the direct shear test apparatus is turned for 105 seconds while in the

weight of 30 kg, the maximum shear strength is reached at 240

seconds.

Through some calculations, normal stress and shear stress can be

obtained. The combination of normal stress and shear stress is plotted to a

graph. From the graph we can see the graph the normal stress increases as

the shear stress increases. By using linear regression method, the shear

angle is obtained, which has value of 40.201

o

. According to table 11.1.3.1

the type of the soil tested is dense angular grains sand because the value of

the shear angle is in the range 40-45. The cohesion also can be determined

by using linear regression method, which has value of Kg/cm

2

.

10

Universitas Indonesia

11.5.3 Error Analysis

The water content may loss during the experiment makes the shear

strength read inaccurate.

The compaction is conducted inconstantly so that the shear stress is

not well distributed.

The direct shear apparatus is not turned in constant translation rate

makes the soil fail early.

Error dial reading may occur due to human error.

11.5.4 Application

Direct shear test is used to determine the shear angle and the

cohesion. This test is very important in geotechnical design. In

geotechnical design, direct shear test is conducted in building a structure

that is not to heavy so that the construction does not require precise

calculation of shear stress. To obtain more accurate calculation of shear

stress, triaxial test is more preferable. The advantage of the direct shear

test itself is it is simpler to be done compared to triaxial test that requires

more complicated procedures and analysis.

11.5.5 Conclusion

This experiment has an objective to determine the value of the

cohesion (c) and the angle of shear (), and the water content of a

soil sample.

The value of cohesion obtained is 0.0526kg/m2 and while the value

of shear angle is 40.201

o

Direct shear test is conducted in simple structure while the triaxial

test is conducted in building more complicated structure.

11.8. References

Budhu, Muni. Soil Mechanics. John Willey and Sons. New York. 2011

Craig, R.F. Craigs Soil Mechanics. Spon Press. New York. 2004

Das, Braja. Principles of Foundation Engineering. Thomson. Toronto.

2007

11

Universitas Indonesia

11.9. Attachments

Figure 11.9.1 Direct Shear Test Apparatus

Figure 11.9.2 Shear Box

- c 0331621Uploaded byAJER JOURNAL
- Geotecnical Depth Set 2Uploaded byrocky21st
- The Ultimate Uplift Capacity of FoundationsUploaded byFrancisco Gonzalez Romero
- Laboratory Testing for Soft RockUploaded byNadim527
- MetodosUploaded bybultusan
- SoilUploaded byOgunlalu Ademola
- GE500101Uploaded byJayasree Pk P K
- Gue & Partner Geotechnical 5Uploaded byRoslan Muhammad
- 3-1-483Uploaded byGeo T Tico
- An integrated model simulating the initation and motion of earthquake and rain induced rapid landslides and its applicatin to the 2006 Leyte landslide.pdfUploaded byMarina Boschkowitz
- Compaction Grout 1Uploaded byKin Hamzah
- Hill Site DevelopmentUploaded byKai Khan
- 1965 Newmark - Earthquakes on Dams and EmbankmentsUploaded by26283369
- Behaviour of Interfaces Between Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer and Gravel SoilsUploaded byInternational Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology
- Analysis of Self-boring Pressuremeter Tests in Overconsolidated ClaysUploaded bytangkokhong
- 201006 sUploaded bygortonm1
- G 10101Uploaded bythanakorn8jitnarong
- Korelasi CPT dan SPTUploaded byArif Nugraha
- Shear Strength Reduction at Soil Structure InterfaceUploaded byKasim Baručija
- Influence of Vane Size and Equipment on the Results in the Vane Shear TestUploaded byNabucodonosor1980
- Modelling Strain Softening Behaviour of Clayey SoilsUploaded byDeepthi
- Geo Lab ReportUploaded byArivalagan Revichandran
- Normalized Shear Modulus Reduction and Damping Ratio Curves of Quartz Sand and Rhyolitic Crushed RockUploaded bygavisita123
- Soil Disturbance of Shanghai Silty Clay During EPB TunnellingUploaded bymetropodikas
- Perspectives in Forensic Geotechnical EngineeringUploaded byAnonymous GnfGTw
- Literature ReviewUploaded byShamim Raja
- Thesis-sand Cemeted GroutUploaded bySajid Iqbal
- DGSI Materials Testing Catalog 2009-10Uploaded byKaty Nieto
- d6467 astmUploaded byBlack Goku
- presiometrosUploaded byAlfredo Garcia Silva

- Mechanical Behaviour of Soils Under Induced Cyclic Loads- by Prisco & Muir WoodUploaded bySangeet Patra
- RMR y Cohesiòn y Friccion en Rocas de Andrew RoseUploaded byFabiola Lucero
- Soils and Foundation HandbookUploaded bymm
- introductionUploaded byAnonymous azwbhf6h0b
- Lid Appendix f Geotechnical ConsiderationsUploaded bySharif
- Analysis and Strengthening of Caisson Foundations-uplift Loads_Stalp Met. TelecomunicatiiUploaded byrelu
- Warrell Creek Aar Working GeotechUploaded byRyanYu
- Geotechnical TestsUploaded byPaul Marion Demapelis
- 3. Wellheads and CasingUploaded bynaefmubarak
- Triaxial testUploaded byJeff
- DE0930Uploaded byMOSHITOMOSHITA
- Cable Car FoundationUploaded byMonal Raj
- Pile Cap Design 1Uploaded bykjpatel2
- Paper_Geosynthetics_Evaluation of The Effect of Synthetic Fibers and Non Woven Geotextile.pdfUploaded byEka Nur Fitriani
- Tsunami 2018Uploaded byRichelle
- Thrubit BrochureUploaded bypendexx
- Dynamic Analysis for Foundation of Vibrating EquipmentsUploaded bytanha56313955
- Sheil and McCabe ASCE IJG 2016Uploaded byAnonymous D5s00DdU
- Part 3 Typical Superstructures, Substructures and ComponentsUploaded byhas960
- Analysis of soil arching effect with different cross-section anti-slide pileUploaded byAnonymous 7VPPkWS8O
- Seismic Load Calculation NSCP 2010 & UBC 1997.xlsxUploaded byFranklyn P. Genove
- New Primary School ProposalUploaded byseraphmau
- On Seismic Response of Stiff and Flexible Retaining StructuresUploaded byBouraida El Yamouni
- Oil Service FactBook-Mar 2014Uploaded byneeltan142
- Hoek,Brown Underground Excavation in RockUploaded byFrancois Holowenczak
- AASHTO GeoTechnical Design of PileUploaded byTee Bun Pin
- Engl199 Descriptive Essay- SeismometerUploaded byJoanne Lai
- UniMasr.com_591a804e2376f25e4985bfe1cb2307aaUploaded byAnonymous kBl0u3n
- Foundation Behaviour Below an Embankment on Soft SoilsUploaded byLuca Brandi
- Pep Rep Geo Technical SolutionsUploaded byShafiullah Khan

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.