You are on page 1of 9

Jim Stone - Fear Obscures Fukushima False Flag

http://thefukushimaradiationtreereports.wordpress.com/2014/05/24/jim-stone-fear-obscures-fukushima-false-flag/
Go to FUKUSHIMA page at http://atruthsoldier.com
April 23, 2012
You are hearing an enormous amount of lies because the high resolution photos totally blew it for the perpetrators.
"I will directly state to Rense and David Icke, you are information scammers. BOTH of you either linked or plagiarized my
site, YOU KNOW THE TRUTH, and for whatever reasons you have been made to sit there and lie about what is going on
out there at Fukushima. Your failure to report the truth will only serve to allow the "elite" to bring a similar 911-type disas-
ter to some other victim nation, and justice would have it be yours."
--Jim Stone
Hi Henry,
I saw this article that says Fukushima is falling apart and America has been irradiated. Another article in Japan Focus says
it will destroy civilization!
Do you think this is just scare-mongering to get us all in a panic? Your thoughts would be much appreciated. This whole
business is very stressful.
Thank you,
Charles
Jim Stone replies: Fear Mongering About Reactor #4 but Long Term Things are Grim for Japan only.
Referring to second article from Japan Focus- That article does not have an ounce of reality in it. It's pure disinfo, the dia-
grams are not even right. This is an assault on the Fukushima report, because it conflicts with the real diagrams and will
cause discord. They HAVE TO kill the Fukushima report to prevent World War 3.
You are hearing an enormous amount of lies coming out of Japan right now because those who perpetrated the crime know
they have been exposed and that the high resolution photos totally blew it for them. They were NOT supposed to be re-
leased.
The explosion at #4 was caused by explosives, just like the WTC. Reactor 4 is building 7.
In the classified photos, you can look straight down the throat of the empty reactor, you can see the dome sitting in the serv-
ice area, and you can clearly see that the service attachment the crane hooks onto, which will NOT be on the dome when the
reactor is in operation, is ON THE DOME. Furthermore, in other not classified photos that are captures from live drone vid-
eo feed, you can clearly see reactor 4's dome is in perfect shape, with the bolts removed and hanging, as they would be dur-
ing normal service.
It is highly unlikely that reactor 4's containment is in a condition that would cause it to collapse, and if the reactor itself is
going to fall over it's meaningless, it's just a shell with no core in it. If the structure itself fell over, it would not contribute to
the disaster significantly, because the fuel rods will fall in solid pieces, and at #3 the explosion totally blew a real function-
ing core out of the reactor, and also blew the fuel pools away, while atomizing them to dust - the worst possible scenario.
All this hoopla about #4 is to cover what happened at #3. The worst possible disaster has already happened, which I re-
ported a year ago and the classified photos PROVE IT.
Don't let new lies cover up an old truth, Fukushima was sabotaged and destroyed with nuclear weapons, it's especially ob-
vious at #4, where evidence remains and was not totally blown away like it was at #3. These were low output nukes in the
single digit kiloton range,
Here are the photos that prove everything I have said here; please ask detractors to present similar evidence DIRECTLY
FROM THE SCENE rather than pretty hand drawn graphics and animations;
This photo clearly shows reactor 3 and its fuel pools are GONE.
This photo clearly shows reactor 4 was dis-assembled and DID NOT explode by itself, explosives HAD TO have been
brought in.
And if that is not enough, This photo ought to make it obvious #4 really was dis-assembled.
And for those readers who may think I am just some idiot, with no credibility, I present this screen capture, which I would
like Rense and Icke to try to get these guys to post for them as well if they are so damn smart: http://www.jimstonefree-
lance.com/800fit.jpg
And, I will directly state to Rense and David Icke, you are information scammers, BOTH of you either linked or plagiarized
my site, YOU KNOW THE TRUTH, and for whatever reasons you have been made to sit there and lie about what is going
on out there at Fukushima. Your failure to report the truth will only serve to allow the "elite" to bring a similar 911 type dis-
aster to some other victim nation, and justice would have it be yours.
That is, of course, if my site and those who linked prove to not be enough to stop them.
Jim Stone Freelancer - Whole Reply Here
I asked Jim for clarification:
"I am going to have to say Japan is destroyed and needs to be abandoned. Hate to say it, but more and more it seems to be
the case. On that account they are right, but the damn fear mongering about reactor 4, which has and will do nothing just
pisses me off because it buries the truth about how all this happened.
People who stay in Japan are going to have serious problems, and the radiation problems are bad enough to eventually ruin
the DNA over generations. It's just not a place for a long term civilization anymore. Even though my own numbers refute
this, and say it is not that bad, reality seems to be playing out differently and I wonder if everything coming out of the place
with regard to how bad the radiation is, is a lie.
I doubt Tokyo is ruined, but certainly the entire Fukushima preficture, Sendai, and other cities within 100 miles of Fukushi-
ma, which means an enormous portion of japan is irreparably ruined. Because this area was prime agricultural land, it's real
bad for Japan. My guess is that the problem will worsen from here."
--
The Argument Fukushima Was Sabotaged
http://www.henrymakow.com/theargumentfukushimasabotage.html
January 27, 2012
(Jeff Rense refused to link to this article. He thinks it is a psy-op to absolve the nuclear industry of blame for Fukushima.
Fine. But when I posted it anyway so people could decide for themselves, he announced he would no longer link to my site.
You will no longer find my work on Rense's site. Sad that a 10 year relationship should end in this fashion. See, "The Hid-
den Jeff Rense." and "Jeff Rense Steps in It.")
Former NSA analyst, Jim Stone, argues that there was no mag 9.0 earthquake. The tsunami was caused by nuclear
bombs in the sea and the Fukushima explosion and meltdown was caused by mini-nukes hidden in cameras installed
by an Israeli security firm. The motive: punish Japan for offering to enrich Iranian uranium and straying from Illu-
minati diktat. This website reserves judgment but offers this introduction by James Farganne in the spirit of free dis-
cussion.
.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
by James Farganne
(henrymakow.com)
When we compare the 6.8-magnitude earthquake which devastated Kobe, Japan January 17, 1995 with Fukushima, the evi-
dence does not stack up.
A quick Google Images search of Kobe reveals incredible destruction of buildings, bridges, elevated highways, and other in-
frastructure.
The Fukushima quake, magnitude 9.0, struck about 70 km off the coast of Japan on March 11, 2011.
It sent a 15-meter tsunami crashing over perfectly undamaged bridges, houses, roads, and cars -- over a populace which
had not been warned of the incoming tsunami, because there was no mag 9.0 earthquake. They were taken completely off-
guard. Yet helicopters were waiting, and people all over Japan got to watch the tsunami roll in on live TV.
What on earth was going on? Ordinarily, the Japanese people are warned of tsunamis. Why weren't they warned? Why was
there no structural damage, no reason for them to suspect that a tsunami was coming?
The quake must have seemed like nothing special to a nation of people who are used to quakes. In a video taken in one To-
kyo newsroom during the Fukushima quake, staff were seen to continue typing at their computer stations, totally unfazed by
it.
A 9.0-magnitude earthquake is more than 100 times stronger than a 6.8. A 9.0 should have devastated everything within a
1,000-km radius. There should have been widespread urban carnage, even worse than what Kobe suffered.
Yet the Fukushima quake of 3/11/11 did not cause a single structure to collapse.
But don't take my word for it. Go look up the helicopter footage on YouTube. Look at the infrastructure the tsunami was
crashing onto. Not the slightest bit of damage. Common sense is enough to make you wonder.
Jim Stone did more than wonder. He dug up and analyzed the Japanese seismograms. He proved there was no 9.0 quake,
and no epicenter out at sea. Instead, there were three simultaneous quakes of much lesser magnitude, all of them inland.
The authorities lied about the 9.0 quake -- made it up out of whole cloth. An earthquake did not cause the tsunami. There
must have been another cause.
Reactors Destroyed by Nukes
It turns out that the official explanation for the Fukushima reactor explosions was bogus as well. Nuclear power contain-
ment walls are extremely thick and strong. Hydrogen explosions could never have destroyed them. As a historical reference,
hydrogen explosions occurred at Three Mile Island and caused no structural damage, nor even any injuries to plant person-
nel.
Furthermore, Reactor Four contained no fuel on 3/11/11, and was therefore nonoperational -- yet it exploded and was de-
stroyed as completely as were the other reactors that day. Reactor Four is like Building 7 at the World Trade Center - an ut-
ter impossibility, a blatant smoking gun. A reactor containing no fuel cannot operate; a nonoperational reactor cannot ex-
plode unless someone explodes it. The destruction of Reactor Four can only have been the result of sabotage.
Israeli Involvement
In February 2010, Japan offered to enrich uranium for Iran. Soon thereafter, an Israeli firm by the name of Magna BSP se-
cured a contract to run security at the Fukushima Daiichi plant. They installed oversized cameras strongly resembling gun-
type nuclear weapons. There is strong evidence that they planted Stuxnet, an Israeli computer virus that attacks Siemens
power plant control systems, and which Israel previously used to damage Iran's nuclear program. Magna BSP also estab-
lished internet data links in the reactor cores, in blatant violation of international nuclear regulations.
All twelve members of that security team returned to Israel in the week before 3/11/11. In the aftermath of the disaster, the
Israelis publicly monitored the reactor cores via their illegal internet data links. Yet no one took them to task for this.
Jim Stone Targeted for Revealing Truth
What caused the tsunami? What destroyed the reactors?
Using skills honed as a former NSA analyst with an engineering background, Jim Stone concluded that Israel was behind
the destruction of Fukushima Daiichi. Now he is paying the price.
Stone proved that there was no 9.0-magnitude quake to cause the tsunami. The tsunami must have been artificially induced,
perhaps by an atomic bomb placed in the Japan Trench.
The tsunami was blamed for flooding the reactors and causing the explosions. But Stone presents compelling evidence that
Israel destroyed the Fukushima Daiichi plant by installing gun-type nuclear weapons in the guise of security cameras, and
then setting them off in the tsunami's aftermath.
Stone demonstrates that the Stuxnet virus continues to distort sensor readings at the disaster site to this day.
Unlike many others in the world of whistle blowers, Stone bases his conclusions on hard evidence and unassailable logic.
Anyone can review and challenge his work. He is open to it.
Since releasing his report and making several radio appearances to support it, Jim Stone has been harassed, threatened, un-
lawfully detained, and is currently facing prison time on completely trumped-up charges.
I have watched the reaction to his work on the net. Some have slandered him. Others have railroaded his work.
No one has debunked him yet.
His conclusions have ramifications that make 9/11 pale in significance.
Why, all across the alternative media, this roaring silence on the work of Jim Stone?
Why haven't more truth sites simply linked to his report, directing people to review the evidence and decide for themselves?
Some have expressed suspicion that Stone might not be what he claims to be. That's irrelevant. Facts are facts. The report
stands on facts.
If you haven't done so yet, I urge you to study Jim Stone's Fukushima report. It is well worth the considerable time and ef-
fort. Then, if you agree that his conclusions are correct, please do your part in spreading this information and dispelling the
alternative media's silence on it.
To conclude, a 9.0-magnitude earthquake never happened in Japan on 3/11; the tsunami must have been artificially induced.
Nor did hydrogen explosions obliterate containment walls of concrete and rebar several feet thick. The official story is im-
possible. Israel was punishing Japan, and Zionist operatives now are attempting to destroy Jim Stone, the man who exposed
the truth.
--
The original report: www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukushima1.html
Interview with visuals: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1G9QlynPBcQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1G9QlynPBcQ
Fukushima - What Really Happened
http://www.henrymakow.com/fukushima_-_what_really_happen.html - See more at:
February 1, 2012
(Left, Reactor 3 vanished after exploding into a mushroom cloud.)
As a hypothesis, Stuxnet explains why the generators failed. It explains how the valves in the passive cooling systems got
shut off.
by James Farganne
(henrymakow.com)
Recently, I posted a short overview of Jim Stone's Fukushima report, which concluded that the 9.0-magnitude quake was a
lie concocted to conceal the real cause of the tsunami: a seabed nuke.
Stone's report proves definitively that the official story of 3/11, like that of 9/11, is a poorly woven fabric of lies and incon-
sistencies.
Drone photos show that the containment walls of Reactors 1, 3, and 4 were obliterated. Concrete walls 4 - 8 feet thick were
blown to dust, leaving only skeletal rebar. Hydrogen, at such low pressure, could never have wrought such massive destruc-
tion. It would defy laws of physics, as well as historical precedent.
The destruction of Reactor 4's containment walls was a clear case of sabotage. It had no fuel in it, so it was not operating.
Yet it blew sky high. Reactor 3 vanished completely, core and all, after exploding into a mushroom cloud.
Claims by Arnie Gundersen that the explosions resulted from "prompt criticality" don't wash. Reactor core meltdowns do
not produce mushroom clouds. Nuclear weapons do that. Moreover, Gundersen, "expert" mouthpiece for the MSM and al-
ternative media outlets, has been outed by real professionals in his field as a fraud.
The foregoing facts are clear enough to the untrained eye. More subtle are signs of sabotage within the power plants' control
systems. Seeing these takes more brainpower. You need to visualize the unfamiliar. You have to find out what switch gear
is. There's a dry official report to hump through, diagrams at which to squint. You have to scroll toward the bottom of
Stone's report for this section. It has no proper title. Just keep your eyes peeled for the first sentence:
"Fukushima was impossible."
This section was the kernel of Stone's investigation. It is a crystalline lattice of logic and evidence that obliterates the offi-
cial story of the reactors' destruction as completely as the reactors were themselves destroyed.
WHAT REALLY HAPPENED?
According to officialdom, the reactors exploded because the cores overheated. The emergency cooling systems failed be-
cause the backup generators were flooded by the tsunami.
All of this is bogus. First, a careful reading of an official report from the World Nuclear Association reveals that the tsunami
did not flood the generators. There was another cause for their malfunction.
Second, three of the nine cooling systems needed no electricity. They used steam power from the reactor cores. They were
the real emergency systems. Swamped generators would therefore have been irrelevant.
Third, these three passive systems kicked in at Reactors 1 and 3. Then the valves that fed them steam were shut. This re-
quired a command. It was a deliberate act.
Who, or what, shut those valves?
The most likely answer points to Dimona, Israel's "nuclear research" center.
ENTER STUXNET
Israeli security firm Magna BSP landed a security contract at Fukushima Daiichi shortly after Japan offered to enrich ura-
nium for Iran. Soon after Magna BSP arrived, cybersecurity giant Symantec reported that the Stuxnet virus had infiltrated
thousands of computers in Japan.
This is significant because Stuxnet is an Israeli invention. Magna BSP, an Israeli firm, had no previous history outside of
contracts with Dimona, where the Stuxnet virus was born.
Stuxnet works by disrupting industrial hydraulics, the pipes and valves that drove Fukushima's cooling systems. Stuxnet
runs amok while sending normal readings to the engineers at their control stations. Israel is documented to have used this vi-
rus to damage centrifuges at a nuclear facility in Iran.
The cooling systems at Fukushima were controlled by Siemens software, which the Stuxnet virus was designed specifically
to attack.
Stuxnet can be administrated via the kind of data link that Magna BSP installed before scramming back to Israel just prior
to the disaster.
As a hypothesis, Stuxnet explains why the generators failed. It explains how the valves in the passive cooling systems got
shut. It explains why engineers are still getting containment pressure readings from Reactor 3, even though the containment
is no longer there, and it explains a lot of other things as well.
If you want to debunk the Stuxnet hypothesis, you're going to have your work cut out for you. If Stuxnet was a duck, then
everything about what happened at Fukushima would be quacking like one.
CONCLUSION
On 3/11/11, Reactors 1, 2, 3, and 4 were utterly destroyed, with 1, 3, and 4 suspiciously exploding.
Though Stone only got direct evidence of a nuke planted at Reactor 3, which produced the mushroom cloud, it is rational to
believe Reactors 1 and 4 also had them, with 4 exploding even though it had no fuel core installed at the time.
The lesser magnitude of the explosions at Reactors 1 and 4 can be attributed to the fact that gun-type nukes are not consis-
tent in their yield. Reactor 3's detonation might also have gotten a boost from the pressure released in a reactor pressure ves-
sel breach -- a sensible conclusion in that the reactor is completely gone. Stuxnet appears to have affected all of the reactors'
control systems, crippling generators and shutting valves. Problems at Reactor 2 appear to be Stuxnet-related only. All four
were fatalities.
But of course, don't take my word for it. Go and study the report for yourself.
3/11 was Japan's 9/11. It's all documented folks!
This investigation has been endorsed by the engineers who designed and
built Fukushima Diiachi
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukushima1.html
--
Our First Article on Stone's Report prompted this Hit Piece in the MSM, Wired.com http://www.wired.com/danger-
room/2012/01/jim-stone-fukushima/
- See more at:
http://www.henrymakow.com/jim_stone_-_fukushima_is_not_f.html#sthash.VHSyuv10.dpuf