You are on page 1of 4

LEARNING TEAM EVALUATION

LEARNING TEAM____D_____ ASSIGNMENT ____WEEK 2 TEAM REFLECTION_______________________ WEEK____2_____
USING THE SCALE BELOW, INDIVIDUALLY RATE EACH MEMBER OF YOUR LEARNING TEAM, INCLUDING YOURSELF (PLEASE USE THE COLLABORATION GUIDE ON THE
NEXT PAGE FOR A MORE DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EACH CATEGORY).

4 = Excellent
Learning Team
Evaluati
on Form

3 = Good

2 = Fair

0 = None

Team
Involvement

Time
Management

Establishing
and Following
Guidelines

Professional
Communication

Team
Contributions

Collaboration
Comments

(Active and
substantively
involved in the
team discussion)

(Supported team
timeline)

(Helped to define
and adhere to the
goals, roles, and
responsibilities of
the team)

(Communicated
clearly and
professionally)

(What did each team member
contribute to the assignment? What
value did that contribution add to
the completed assignment? )

(Please include any comments
describing why each person
received the collaboration score that
you gave them.)

score

score

score

score

comments

comments

Self Score
Lisa Keene

Team Member
Ahmed Abuoun

1 = Poor

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

I contributed to team
discussions, along
with company
selection and
determination
between service or
product to use for this
week’s assignment.
My portion of the
assignment was
completed and
submitted on time.
Ahmed contributed to
team discussions this
week. He also
completed and
submitted his portion
on time.

Team D, so far, is
working very well
together. All of the
team members
participate to the best
of the ability and has
so far, submitted their
portions in a timely
manner. I gave
everyone a score of 4
based on this week’s
assignment,
participation, and
timeliness.
Team D, so far, is
working very well
together. All of the
team members
participate to the best
of the ability and has
so far, submitted their

This form is designed to help in evaluating Learning Team collaboration expectations and performance. Substantive involvement in the Learning Team Collaborative Discussion
is defined as any posts or contribution that adds value to the overall discussion. This may include presenting new ideas, examples, perspective, or asking additional questions of
team members that help to further the overall team discussion. Students attending class at local campuses are encouraged to use the Online Learning Forums available in the
course eCampus page. They should also document any offline collaboration that is conducted in their Learning Teams.
February 2011

They should also document any offline collaboration that is conducted in their Learning Teams. All of the team members participate to the best of the ability and has so far.LEARNING TEAM EVALUATION Team Member Jeremy Davis Team Member Marinela Diko 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Jeremy participated in team discussions this week. He also completed and submitted his portion on time. participation. Students attending class at local campuses are encouraged to use the Online Learning Forums available in the course eCampus page. is working very well together. I gave everyone a score of 4 based on this week’s assignment. participation. Team D. is working very well together. Substantive involvement in the Learning Team Collaborative Discussion is defined as any posts or contribution that adds value to the overall discussion. and This form is designed to help in evaluating Learning Team collaboration expectations and performance. and timeliness. This may include presenting new ideas. submitted their portions in a timely manner. She was very prompt in her responses to the team in regards to the direction we should be taking this week. She was prompted in completing the assignment to post portions in a timely manner. I gave everyone a score of 4 based on this week’s assignment. and timeliness. Marinela led the team in the Week 2 assignment. February 2011 . submitted their portions in a timely manner. I gave everyone a score of 4 based on this week’s assignment. Team D. so far. She was active in all team discussions. so far. or asking additional questions of team members that help to further the overall team discussion. examples. All of the team members participate to the best of the ability and has so far. participation. perspective.

notNo one. member. and grammatical errors. I believe team should receive the same grade. and responsibilities of the Communication was or poor with The team worked well together in deciding what company to use for the assignment. 2) What value you did you add to the completed product? How does that compare to your teammates? Each team member was No substantive in Did supportwhich the team follow goals. Substantive involvement in the Learning Team Collaborative Discussion is defined as any posts or contribution that adds value to the overall discussion. roles. clear with discussions. and tone. is Team Collaboration Guide this week’s working very well Team Time Establishing and Following Professional Involvement Management Guidelines Communication discussions and together. should get a different grade or lower) and why? Yes. responsibilities of the team. This may include presenting new ideas. service of ortheproduct. or responsibilities. timeliness. assignment. Communication was Fair (2) involvement in team timeline and met the responsibilities of the team. active in involvement team discussions in not deciding company to Did use. Students attending class at local campuses are encouraged to use the Online Learning Forums available in the course eCampus page. submitted no typographical or grammatical their errors. 4 4 4 4 Walt participated in Team D. with other members on time. Each team members portions were submitted to the team forum in a timely fashion to grammatical errors. Team Member Learning Walt Seng Interacted with other members Team Member of the team with an informal Moderate substantive Supported some of the team (Name) Followed the goals. Interactions with other members 1) Based on the contributions and collaboration for this assignment. timeliness. involvement in team timeline but still met the roles. roles. All of the selection of company members Interactedteam with other members of the team with a respectful and best and which direction participate to the Active and substantive Supported team timeline and Took the lead on establishing professional tone. and responsibilities team. effective with minor Team Member discussion. based Good (3) involvement in team the goals. This form is designed to help in evaluating Learning Team collaboration expectations and performance. Team Contributions Please consider the following when providing individual and team feedback on contributions made to the assignment. team. perspective. or asking additional questions of team members that help to further the overall team discussion. assignment due date. typographical or grammatical (Name) errors. and following the goals. 3) What can you. do to improve future team collaborations? I could think more outside of the box in terms of suggestions to offer the team. on this week’s to help if needed. so far. we should go – Communication of thewas ability and has Excellent (4) involvement in team met the assignment due date. They should also document any offline collaboration that is conducted in their Learning Teams.LEARNING TEAM EVALUATION for team approval. minor typographical or participation. Communication was clear with discussion. roles. Poor (1) and inappropriate at times. along with the service product discussion. portions in a timely Walt completed and submitted his portion I gave Interactedmanner. personally. Each team member communicated their opinions in a timely manner. should all team members getteam the same grade? If not. so far. Marinela time to compile the portions and fit into one flowing paper for submission. assignment due date. roles. and offered everyone a score Supported a majority of the of the team with a respectful and of 4 Good overall substantive Helped to establish and follow team timeline and met the professional tone.team in my opinion. who of the were disrespectful Minimal substantive Did(higher not support the team Did not always all follow themembers goals.pulled No communication. February 2011 . timeline . *Please review the Learning Team Collaboration Guide on the next page for a description of the expectations for each category. numerous typographical orallow approach we should take. examples. more weight than another team None (0) team discussion. and assignment due date.

They should also document any offline collaboration that is conducted in their Learning Teams. February 2011 .LEARNING TEAM EVALUATION This form is designed to help in evaluating Learning Team collaboration expectations and performance. perspective. Substantive involvement in the Learning Team Collaborative Discussion is defined as any posts or contribution that adds value to the overall discussion. Students attending class at local campuses are encouraged to use the Online Learning Forums available in the course eCampus page. This may include presenting new ideas. or asking additional questions of team members that help to further the overall team discussion. examples.