This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
to lose sight of the fact that we—as a community of kindred souls—once valued common sense. So cast back in your memory to that long-forgotten concept and embrace the fact that the TheAntiTerrorist & Velluminous Press stand above all for freedom and personal responsibility. Simply stated, how you apply this information in your own life has nothing to do with us. These transcripts are for education and entertainment purposes only. TheAntiTerrorist on the Insanity of it All Broadcast on 5 October 2007
Hello friends, I am TheAntiTerrorist. Thank you once again for all your messages of support, your emails and your questions. I’ve revisited a few things recently that I saw last year, just to catch up and remind myself of some of the information that I need to engage in these conversations, and one of the things I revisited most recently was Who Killed John O'Neill? I highly recommend you watch this short ﬁlm, it won’t take much of your time but you will have a very steep learning curve in terms of getting the information regarding the background to the events leading up to 9/11, the personalities involved in what links them. Whatever you think about the quality of the acting it’s really irrelevant, it’s a moot point. It’s the information that the ﬁlm contains that I really recommend you take a look at. The conclusions made by this ﬁlm had the same effect on me as it did the ﬁrst time I watched it—my head was swimming, I was questioning my own sanity, I was questioning whether I wanted to engage in this conversation at all. It just seems too big sometimes to comprehend and too big to make a dent in. I know for a fact that some of you out there are having a lot of difﬁculty in dealing with this subject matter, and like myself you’ll sit there and think, “Am I going efﬁng mad dealing with all this information? Is having all this information in my head making me certiﬁable?” It’s a very difﬁcult situation we’ve got ourselves into, and we’re talking about subject matter that could actually send you a little bit crazy if you aren’t careful. Despite the fact that I’m not an intellectual by any means, I acknowledge the fact that I have a certain amount of emotional intelligence and I take comfort in a quote from Fromm: [video] Now I’m not psychotic yet, but if I see more bully boy cops tasering unarmed students who simply care to ask a corrupt senator a few difﬁcult questions I might just ﬂip out. And I won’t be held responsible for my actions at that point, I can assure you. I’m joking, of course. Or am I?
The incident I’m referring to can be found on YouTube, a young student asking John Kerry a few difﬁcult questions that [Kerry] didn’t like very much. It’s worth a watch because it will make you angry, which is important right now, because anger is a fear killer, and it’s only by getting rid of the fear generated by all this anti-terror legislation that we can motivate ourselves to do something about it and make a difference. Now I need to make a point about the effects of trauma and pain and the brain’s ability to forget it, and using images from 9/11, even the people jumping from the buildings isn’t enough to spark the thoughts I need you to think about, because we are a little bit complacent about those now and they are long gone and the brain doesn’t relate to them in the same way that we used to because we’ve been saturated by those pictures in the media. I’m going to use a subject that’s a little closer to home and show you a piece of video that may be a little upsetting for some of you, it may disturb you a little, but please bear with me so I can make my point after you’ve seen it. [one of the worst videos in the world] Again, apologies for showing you that. If you would like to see the full video it’s called Meet Your Meat and can be found on GoodleVideo or YouTube. My point in showing you that is to give you a sense of how your mind works. Having seen how those animals are treated in the intensive farming process—if you are a meat eater, one of two things would have happened there; it would have made you feel very uncomfortable, but you have decided you are a meat-eater and you are aware of those aspects of intensive farming and you are aware of how those animals are treated, it may just make you think aboout the meat you buy in the supermarket. Alternatively, it may actually horrify you as it did me. I went vegetarian for a year, but the diet didn’t suit me and so I decided that a rationalised compromise would be to eat organic meat only. I went to my local butcher and found out how the animals were treated, how they were killed and so on, and I could therefore have what I wanted without contributing to what is essentially an insane situation where animals are being treated incredibly badly in order to meet a very high demand for cheap meat. I’ll bet you any money you like if you were traumatised by those few minutes of video at all, you’ll be eating meat again within 2-3 weeks, maybe 2-3 months, whatever it is, there will be a time span where you will be affected by it and then you will be able to rationalise to yourself that you need meat, that perhaps it wasn’t that traumatic after all, and before long you will be eating your pork steaks and your chicken breasts without too much of a care about it all. It’s a little like pregnancy and childbirth. Any woman who has had more than one child will tell you that it’s the most painful experience, and yet, between 6-9 months after the
childbirth, the ﬁrst childbirth, the woman forgets the pain almost entirely and can only just about create a sense-memory of it—just enough to know that it was painful, but she cannot re-live that painful experience to the degree that it will not allow her to have a second child. It’s this ability of the brain to forget, to rationalise and to shut out painful and traumatic events that the elites are depending upon to be able to carry out there plan. They are relying on our desire to forget it, because it’s just too painful, to confusing, too infuriating, too maddening to keep in our heads. So, without meaning to suggest the debunkers are insane, I would put it to you that they are just trying to rationalise it, to forget trauma, to forget the pain in the only way they know how, which is to deny its connexion to the NWO, deny that it was an inside job, deny that there is any conspiracy, because it allows them to then move on with their lives and have some piece of mind again, and [recapture some semblance of] the life they used to have before 9/11. I would put it to you that we are doing the same thing. We are looking for—and ﬁnding—the information that we need to prove ourselves right so that we can move forward and get on with our lives. In the same way that you decide to buy a new car and you want to buy a Volkswagen, all of a sudden you begin to see Volkswagens everywhere because they are in your consciousness. Or say a woman gets pregnant and all of a sudden she starts seeing lots of babies. It’s not that they magically appear out of the ether, they’ve always been there but she’s just never noticed. Now that being pregnant is in her consciousness, she can now see them. I know you understand what I mean by that. We are always going to see what we want to see, the debunkers are always going to ﬁnd just enough information to battle truth as argument and vice versa, and it’s going to be a closely run race unless someone comes out as a whistleblower and just blows the lid off the whole thing and then we’ll ﬁnd out who’s right. Until then, it’s going to be neck-and-neck, and there isn’t going to be any winners in this race at all. Of course, we are the paranoid ones, we are the schizophrenics, we are the psychotics and the insane ones because we have decided that there is something very, very dark happening and that 9/11 was just the beginning of that, and that there’s something moving froward very fast now towards a world where we are not going to be free. There are some debunkers out there who understand what the NWO is, and they’re ﬁghting it just as hard as we are. The only problem they have is [with the concept] that 9/11 was an inside job and they cannot see it for the problem/reaction/solution situation that we understand it to be. What I’m asking for is a little compassion for them, a little understanding, and that we can all just agree to disagree on 9/11. I’m not saying it’s essential that we know, but we are not going to ﬁnd out right now unless someone comes out of the woodwork and tells us. What we need to be doing is looking to the present to ﬁx the things we can ﬁx right now instead of looking to the past and arguing about what actually happened, because there is something very dark happening here and we
need to ﬁght it together. We cannot carry on with this bickering and inﬁghting that the government are enjoying so much, that the Elites are getting so much power from, that they are orchestration with disinformation they are using to distract us from what they are doing behind the curtain. All we’re really talking about here is an interpretation of history. So, bearing in mind that the winner gets to write the history, who is going to be the group who writes it? Is it going to be the debunkers? Or is it going to be the conspiracy theorists? Because it’s the person or the group with the most deﬁned version of their reality and their ability to get that across to the masses that will win in the end. And so, as a deﬁnition of that, we have someone like Bill O’Reilly from Fox News Network. Now, Bill O’Reilly [seems to have] the innate ability to bend the truth to his will and spin half-truths into convincing lies and to lead a good percentage of the American public down such a dark alley and still have them thinking they are looking into the light. It’s incredible, and he does it by speaking with 100% conviction and 100% commitment to the lie that he’s telling. It is his ability to deﬁne reality for so many Americans that makes him a dangerous individual. So when you’re out there, delivering the truth, how strong is your version of reality? How committed are you to this premise? Are you easily swayed by the debunkers? Do you speak with commitment? Do you speak with 100% knowledge of your subject? Do you know what the debunking argument is so that you can ﬁght it with your own facts? Before you answer those questions, let me give you a deﬁnition of commitment; let’s say that you’re committed to ﬁghting the NWO, in terms of the word ‘commitment’ let’s have a look at it this way; Imagine that you have someone very close to you, imagine the person who is closest to you in your life, whether it’s your mother, your father, your brother, your sister or your lover, your wife, your husband, just pick a person and hold them in your mind for a second. It’s very late at night, you’ve had a very long day at work and your head is just about to hit the pillow, and your man or your woman or your mother or your father is not home yet, but you’ve had a very long day, your head’s just about to hit the pillow and you know as soon as it does you’re going to be asleep, and you need the sleep because you’re dreadfully tired. It’s about 2 am and the phone rings, it’s the person you’ve chosen, and they’re on the phone and they’re telling you that they’re stuck—they’re two hours away in a car, they’re stuck on the motorway, their car has broken down, there are lorries whizzing past at 70-90 miles an hour, it’s raining, and they want you to come and get them. Would you go to pick them up from that motorway? Would you drive for two hours to go and get them? Of course you would. Because you’re committed to them. That’s what commitment is. No matter how you feel, no matter what you want, you go and get them. That’s commitment. Anything less than that, anything else, is not bad or wrong, it’s just not commitment. You’re not committed. It’s as simple as that. So ask yourself now, the same question, no matter what I want, no matter how I feel, am I
committed to ﬁght the NWO? It’s a tough question. [Video—Rockefeller; guilty and proud] So there you see, that’s all you need. We don’t need to be discussing 9/11 and whether it was an inside job or not, whether there was complicity on the part of the government, whether there were planes or no planes or missiles or explosives in the buildings—it’s all irrelevant right now, because there’s all the proof you need. The people who have the money and the political leverage are creating a NWO, they’re creating one world. You have a man in his own words telling you what he’s going to do—that is all you need to convince the sheeple, along with footage of police zapping students while they are trying to question senators and they will get a sense of it. The 9/11 argument as proof of NWO is going to get you caught up in a maze you cannot get out of. You cannot prove any of it. All we know for certain is that planes hit those buildings and they came down. That’s it. Period. Everything else is conjecture and hearsay. Everything else. But what we do know, from the words of their own mouths is that these people with money and power are creating a world that we do not want to live in. I don’t know about you, but I am 100% certain that I can prove that the NWO is coming about. I can prove who’s behind it. I am 100% against it and I will ﬁght it with the last breath in my body. I am 100% committed. If that makes me insane, then guilty as charged; bring on the white jackets; I’m as mad as a box of frogs. Who’s with me? Thanks for listening.
HEO 9 February 2009 © MMIX TheAntiTerrorist & Velluminous Press
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.