You are on page 1of 6

5/21/2014 Process Engineering | Understand and Control Hot Vapor Bypass | Chemical Processing 1/6
Chemical Processing
White Papers
Home Articles 2007 Understand and Control Hot Vapor Bypass
Understand and Control Hot Vapor Bypass
Contributing Editor Andrew Sloley says pressure control technique works
well if implemented properly, in this month's Plant InSites column.
By Andrew Sloley, contributing editor
Jan 08, 2007
Hot vapor bypass is a powerful method for controlling tower pressure. Applied correctly, it allows for rapid, sensitive and
reliable control. Overall, its one of my favorite methods for tower control in systems with a reasonably wide boiling range of
components overhead and some ability to handle a range of material in an overhead vapor product. However, hot vapor
bypass has a bad reputation. Yet, problems invariably stem from lack of understanding of the control method, improper
application or unintended consequences of other changes.
Unintended consequences can create major downstream problems, as one gas plant learned. Figure 1 depicts how it used
hot vapor bypass for pressure control of a depropanizer tower. While not to scale, the figure shows the major equipment
(tower, exchangers and drum) in the correct size ratio and identifies some critical elevations.
5/21/2014 Process Engineering | Understand and Control Hot Vapor Bypass | Chemical Processing 2/6
Figure 1. Removing a useless level control led to large oscillations in fuel gas supplyand random flooding of the liquid drain system. (Click to enlarge.)
Originally the overhead control system included pressure control by venting overhead gas to fuel, accumulator level control
by resetting reflux rate, and direct flow control of the overhead distillate liquid. The hot vapor bypass line (through flow
indicator FI02) wasnt under direct control. The bypass was regulated via a hand-operated valve. Rate through the hot vapor
bypass was set by pressure balance between the flow path through the condensers and through the bypass line. The
condensers drained through a line into the top of the drum D1.
This configuration has at least two major flaws:
1. The top of the drum is 17.5 ft. above grade. The pressure control line to the fuel system is 18.5 ft. above grade.
Unless the liquid level can be kept within that 1-ft. span, the drum can flood, sending liquid to the fuel system via the
vent line. (The amount of liquid going to the fuel system depends upon the liquid height in the system, the hand
control valve setting on the hot vapor bypass and the pressure control set point.)
2. Liquid level varies due to changes in accumulation caused by the difference between the overhead rate from the
tower and the sum of the reflux rate (FC04), product rate (FC05) and rate to fuel. Invariably, the liquid level exceeded
18.5 ft. The actual operating procedure was to keep the reflux-rate and product-rate settings constant until the unit
became completely inoperable. When the level was too high, liquid would back up into the condensers until so much
surface area was covered that tower pressure rose due to lack of condensation. In response the operators would
increase the product rate to draw down the liquid. Flow settings were left constant until the level dropped too low. At
that point the operators would reduce the product rate to refill the system.
Well look at this case again in future columns, as we can draw many lessons from it. For now, though, well concentrate on
how one specific change made the situation even worse. Due to what were reported as problems with pump net positive
suction head (NPSH), the configuration was changed to deliberately flood the drum to increase the liquid head available at
the suction of reflux pumps P1 and P2. This makes the level control LC01 always read 100%. Because the level controller
no longer generated a usable control signal, the controller was removed from service. So, the operators no longer had a
direct measure of liquid level. However, the rest of the system was left as-is. This seemingly minor change had a major
unintended consequence large oscillations in fuel gas supply and random flooding of the fuel-gas-system drip tank
(liquid drain system).
Checks every morning and afternoon for three days pinpointed the problem. They all showed the system was pushing liquid
into the fuel gas system. During the checks the hot vapor bypass line was always hot to the touch, indicating that large
5/21/2014 Process Engineering | Understand and Control Hot Vapor Bypass | Chemical Processing 3/6
amounts of vapor were going through that line.
This miscue not only underscores the need to check control configuration against the fundamentals of the control intent but
also the necessity of understanding all possible results before making operating changes.
What are your comments?
You cannot post comments until you have logged in. Login Here.
No one has commented on this page yet.
RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments
Member Login
Become a Member focuses exclusively on serving professionals designing and operating plants in the chemical
industry. The unique content helps you make your sites as efficient, safe, environmentally friendly and economically
competitive as possible.
Most Popular
Check out the most popular content on , as determined by our visitors.
1. #1Compressed Air Systems: The Secret is in the Pipe
2. #2Cyber Security Threats: Watch Out for Watering Holes
3. #3Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger: Pick the Right Side
4. #4Understand The Difference Between IoT and M2M
5. #5Consider VFDs for Centrifugal Pumps
5/21/2014 Process Engineering | Understand and Control Hot Vapor Bypass | Chemical Processing 4/6
Featured Sponsors
Ask the Experts
A roster of leading authorities in many fields to help you address technical issues.
5/21/2014 Process Engineering | Understand and Control Hot Vapor Bypass | Chemical Processing 5/6
Subscribe to E-Newsletters
Subscribe to the Magazine
Get the Article RSS Feed
General Information
Advertiser Preview
Editorial Calendar
Current Issue
Issue Archive
Meet the Editors
Sister Web Sites
5/21/2014 Process Engineering | Understand and Control Hot Vapor Bypass | Chemical Processing 6/6
Sustainable Plant
Copyright 2004-2014 Chemical Processing. All rights reserved. Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Legal
Disclaimers, Terms & Conditions