R65 Habeas

Corpus
Amparo Habeas Data
Burden
of Proof
Petition for
certiorari -
Petitioner
(Section 1)
MANDAMUS-
person
aggrieved
(Section 3)

Petitioner
(Section 6)
The respondent
pu!ic officia! or
e"p!o#ee$ The#
cannot invo%e the
presu"ption that
officia! dut# has
een regu!ar!#
perfor"ed to
evade
responsii!it#
(Section 1&)
'n the part of the
respondent(pu!ic
officia! )ho sha!!
state in the *erified
+ritten ,eturn- the
!a)fu! defenses$
(Section 1.-
Section 1/ )
Quantum
of
Evidence
Sustantia!
(0ase 1a))
Preponderance
of evidence
(Since specia!
proceeding
under the ,u!es
of 0ourt)
Sustantia!
evidence (0ivi!
Procedure)
Sustantia!
2vidence
(Section 1&)
Sustantia!
2vidence
(Section 16)
Rule on
dismissa
l on
cases
The court "a#
re3uire the
respondents to
fi!e their
co""ent to-
and not a
"otion to
dis"iss- the
petition$
The court-
ho)ever- "a#
dis"iss the
petition if it finds
the sa"e to e
patent!# )ithout
"erit-
prosecuted
"anifest!# for
de!a#- or that
the 3uestions
raised therein
are too
4f it appears that
the person
a!!eged to e
restrained of his
!iert# is in the
custod# of an
officer under
process issued
# a court or
5udge or #
virtue of a
5udg"ent or
order of a court
of record- and
that the court or
5udge had
5urisdiction to
issue the
process- render
the 5udg"ent- or
"a%e the order-
the )rit sha!! not
e a!!o)ed6 or if
Motion to dis"iss
is a prohiited
"otion (Section
11)6
4f petitioner can7t
appear for a va!id
cause- the court
sha!! not dis"iss
ut on!# archive$
Petition e
dis"issed )ith
pre5udice upon
fai!ure to
prosecute case
after !apse of 8
#ears fro" notice
to petitioner of
order archiving it
(Section 8.)
Motion to dis"iss is
a prohiited "otion
(Section)6
4f a!!egations are
not proved #
sustantia!
evidence- privi!ege
sha!! e denied
(Section 16)
unsustantia! to
re3uire
consideration$
(Section 6-
Section 9)
the 5urisdiction
appears after
the )rit is
a!!o)ed- the
person sha!! not
e discharged
# reason of
an# infor"a!it#
or defect in the
process-
5udg"ent- or
order$
No )rit of
haeas corpus
can e
disoe#ed for
defect of for"- if
it sufficient!#
appears
therefro" in
)hose custod#
or under )hose
restraint the
part#
i"prisoned or
restrained is
he!d and the
court or 5udge
efore )ho" he
is to e rought$
(Section /-
Section :)
Standard
of
Diligenc
e
Due or ordinar#
di!igence

,easona!e
di!igence (2N
;AN0 <=$,$ No$
1>99.8$
Nove"er 1&-
8../? 4N ,2@
TA2 +,4T 'B
AA;2AS
0',PUS B',
,2CNA1D' D2
*411A (detained
at the Ne)
;i!iid Prisons-
Muntin!upa 0it#)
,espondent is
private individual-
ordinar# di!igence
,espondent is
public official-
eDtraordinar#
di!igence6 no
presu"ption of
regu!arit#
(Section 1&)

No !a)6 no
5urisprudence
c!osest app!ica!e
provision@

S20$ 1.- (ii) the
steps or actions
taken by the
respondent to
ensure the security
and confidentiality
of the data or
information;
,2CNA1D' D2
*411A-
petitioner-
EUN2 D2
*411A-
petitioner-
re!ator- vs$ TA2
D4,20T',-
N2+ ;414;4D
P,4S'NS-
respondent)
',D4NA,C
D414=2N02
eneral
Denial
Allo!ed
"
A!!o)ed$ The
conse3uence is
that fai!ure to
"a%e an eDp!icit
denia! is
considered an
ad"ission$
(,u!es of 0ourt)
A!!o)ed$ (,u!e
1.8- ,u!es of
0ourt)
Not a!!o)ed$
(Section :- !ast
paragraph)
Not a!!o)ed$
(Section 1.- !ast
paragraph)
Presump
tion of
Regularit
#
Ces$ (Section 1) Ces (Section 1) No$ (Section 1&) No$ (Section 1&)