Human social systems and ecosystems are complex adaptive systems. They have feedbac& structures that promote survival in a constantly chan'in' environment. Important characteristics of human social systems are population si)e social or'ani)ation values technolo'y wealth education &nowled'e and many more. People modify the environment for their purposes and obtain benefits (Ecosystem services) from it.
Human social systems and ecosystems are complex adaptive systems. They have feedbac& structures that promote survival in a constantly chan'in' environment. Important characteristics of human social systems are population si)e social or'ani)ation values technolo'y wealth education &nowled'e and many more. People modify the environment for their purposes and obtain benefits (Ecosystem services) from it.
Human social systems and ecosystems are complex adaptive systems. They have feedbac& structures that promote survival in a constantly chan'in' environment. Important characteristics of human social systems are population si)e social or'ani)ation values technolo'y wealth education &nowled'e and many more. People modify the environment for their purposes and obtain benefits (Ecosystem services) from it.
defined as interactions between the human social system and (the rest of) the ecosystem. Human social systems and ecosystems are complex adaptive systems (Marten !""#). $omplex because ecosystems and human social systems have many parts and many connections between these parts. %daptive because they have feedbac& structures that promote survival in a constantly chan'in' environment. Human social system In order to analyse Human Environmental Interactions it is important to be aware of specific characteristics of the human social system. (he type of society stron'ly influences peoples attitude towards nature their behaviour and therefore theirimpact on ecosystems. Important characteristics of human social systems are population si)e social or'ani)ation values technolo'y wealth education &nowled'e and many more. Especially values and &nowled'e stron'ly influence peoples view of life and conse*uently define the way people act. (he choice of possible actions is then limited by the available technolo'y. +eople modify the environment for their purposes and obtain benefits (Ecosystem ,ervices) from it. (hese Ecosystem Services are essential forhuman well- being and include for example the provision of resources li&e water timber food ener'y information land for farmin' and many more. -bviously by usin' these resources people affect the environment in a lot of ways. .urthermore people often reor'ani)e existin' ecosystems to achieve new ones that seem to be more effective in servin' their needs. Coevolution and Coadaptation (he terms coevolution and coadaptation describe the never/endin' process of mutual adjustment and chan'e between human social systems and the environment. +eoples actions have conse*uences on the environment. 0ut also the environment influences human activities. Human social systems have to adapt to their specific environment. 1atural phenomena li&e storms earth*ua&es force people to react. (hese natural phenomena can either be directly or not primarily caused by human actions and a'ain influence human behaviour as people have to respond to a new situation. Drivers-Pressures-State-Impact-esponse (he 2rivers/+ressures/,tate/Impact/3esponse (2+,I3) model was ori'inally developed by the European Environmental %'ency (EE%) and is used to assess and mana'e environmental problems. Many national and European institutions adopted this conceptual framewor&. It identifies the various causal chains of lin!s between human activities and environmental de'radation. (he model distin'uishes several cate'ories of indicators in order to explain how the state of the environment is chan'ed due to human activities. Human activities increase or miti'ate pressure on the environment. (he drivin' forces which initiate human activities are mainly socio/ economic and socio/cultural forces. (he followin' 'raphic explains the 2+,I3 process4 Source: http://www.uni- kiel.de/ecology/users/fmueller/salzau2006/studentpages/Human!n"ironmental#nterac tions/inde$.html RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN HUMANS AND NATURE IN DIFFERENT SOCIETIES Hunter-gatherer socetes Food acquisition and social structure Hunter-gatherer societies obtain their food directly from natural ecosystems, by hunting wild animals and collecting wild plants (Richerson et al. 199!. "his re#uires intimate, detailed $nowledge of plant and animal species in the local en%ironment. & hunter-gatherer lifestyle can support a relati%ely small number of people in most landscapes, so population densities of hunter-gatherer societies tend to be low Beliefs and attitudes toward nature and wildlife "he direct dependence of hunter gathers on natural ecosystems for their food, and the intimate $nowledge of the natural world that this re#uires, is generally reflected in their beliefs and attitudes toward nature and wildlife. 'uch peoples commonly %iew themsel%es as inseparable from the natural ecosystems and wildlife around them ((ottleib 199, )ilber *+++!. &nimals are often regarded to be another $ind of people, or as spirit beings, who can be appealed to for help and protection. Rituals are commonly performed to show respect, gratitude and re%erence for the animal-spirits, with the hope of promoting continued hunting success. ,ther rituals to influence natural e%ents, such as the coming of rain, are also not uncommon in hunter-gatherer cultures. "hese literal beliefs in magic, ritual and fusion of humans with the natural world are often termed animism Influences on natural ecosystems and wildlife ,%erall, hunter-gatherer societies are generally regarded as the best of all types of societies at coe-isting with natural wildlife populations, because human population densities tend to be low and because this way of getting food in%ol%es the least manipulation of natural ecosystems. Late In!ustra" Food acquisition and social structure .ate industrial societies such as ours are mar$ed by highly de%eloped technology and by the widespread use of computers and other information technologies. &d%anced technologies are applied to manipulate the en%ironment to increase benefits. ¬her $ey characteristic of our current late industrial society is the abundant use of electricity and other forms of energy, as well as high resource consumption. Beliefs and attitudes toward nature and wildlife /odern society uses its technology and a capitalist mar$et economy to create an en%ironment for the maintenance of human populations that is largely buffered from the natural world, or at least apparently so. )e feed oursel%es and obtain other resources by participation in the economy. Influences on natural ecosystems and wildlife "he technological ability of late industrial societies to alter natural ecosystems and impact wildlife populations is intense. .ate industrial human society is now a global force on par with other natural processes. "here is essentially no place on the 0arth1s surface where pesticides and other pollutants cannot be found. ,%er 2+3 of the terrestrial net primary producti%ity of the earth is used by humans, and *43 of the total earth1s primary producti%ity. 5epletion of the stratospheric o6one layer by the use of chlorofluorocarbons and related chemicals threatened to e-pose the entire earth to cancer-causing ultra%iolet radiation until international regulations successfully inter%ened (/asters 199!. Howe%er, perhaps the most disconcerting of all the global en%ironmental impacts of industrial society is global climate change. http://marine%io.org/oceans/conser"ation/moyle/ch&-'.asp THE FUTUREWHERE ARE WE GOIG!