Jillian Myers Web Site Evaluation Form

URL: http://www.primarygames.com,b

1) Website Title: Two minute Warning
Target Learner: 3rd Grader Evaluator: Jillian Myers

/flashcards/multiplication/start.htm
Subject/topic: Date: 10/30/09

Instruction: Use the following criteria to rate the quality of the website of your choice (1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest). Be sure to provide a rationale to support your judgment and recommendation of the website. CRITERIA CONTENT Website is affiliated with a reputable organization. Learning goals/objectives are clearly stated. Learning activities are student-centered. Author/webmaster’s contact information is provided. Content information is accurate and bias free. Content information is reliable. Content information is up to date. Content information is grade/age appropriate. Grammar and spelling are accurate. Website information complies with copyright laws. Bibliographic references are provided. Website provides high-level user interactivity. Subtotal: 13 14 15 16 DESIGN Overall screen display is visually pleasing. Text is legible. Multimedia enhances learning. Multimedia elements work properly. Subtotal: 17 18 19 20 NAVIGATION All links work properly. All links are clearly labeled. A site map is provided. Website is easy to navigate. Subtotal: GRAND TOTAL (Content + Design + Navigation): Excellent: Above 90 Good: 75-89 Fair: 60-74 RATING 4 3 2 x

5 x x

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

x X X X X X X X 45/60 points 5 4 3 2 X X X X 20/20 points 5 4 3 2 X X x X 18/20 points 63/100 points

1

1

Poor: Below 60

Rationale for recommendation: Write a couple of paragraphs to 1) summarize the evaluation result, 2) make a recommendation for use, not use or use with caution of this website in your teaching, and 3) provide a rationale to support your recommendation. .

Web Site Evaluation Form 1) Website Title: Discovery Education Puzzlemaker
Target Learner: 3rd Grader Evaluator: Jillian Myers URL:

http://puzzlemaker.discoveryeducation.com/
Subject/topic: Date: 10/30/09

Instruction: Use the following criteria to rate the quality of the website of your choice (1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest). Be sure to provide a rationale to support your judgment and recommendation of the website. CRITERIA CONTENT Website is affiliated with a reputable organization. Learning goals/objectives are clearly stated. Learning activities are student-centered. Author/webmaster’s contact information is provided. Content information is accurate and bias free. Content information is reliable. Content information is up to date. Content information is grade/age appropriate. Grammar and spelling are accurate. Website information complies with copyright laws. Bibliographic references are provided. Website provides high-level user interactivity. Subtotal: 13 14 15 16 DESIGN Overall screen display is visually pleasing. Text is legible. Multimedia enhances learning. Multimedia elements work properly. Subtotal: 17 18 19 20 NAVIGATION All links work properly. All links are clearly labeled. A site map is provided. Website is easy to navigate. Subtotal: GRAND TOTAL (Content + Design + Navigation): Excellent: Above 90 Good: 75-89 Fair: 60-74 5 RATING 4 3 2 x x x x x x x x x x x 56/60 points 4 3 2 X 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

5 x

1

x x x 18 /20 points 5 4 3 2 X X X X 20 /20 points 94 /100 points

1

Poor: Below 60

Rationale for recommendation: Write a couple of paragraphs to 1) summarize the evaluation result, 2) make a recommendation for use, not use or use with caution of this website in your teaching, and 3) provide a rationale to support your recommendation. .

Web Site Evaluation Form 1) Website Title: National Target Learner: 3rd Grader
Evaluator: Jillian Myers

Geographic Kids

URL: http://kids.nationalgeographic.com/ Subject/topic: Date: 10/30/09

Instruction: Use the following criteria to rate the quality of the website of your choice (1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest). Be sure to provide a rationale to support your judgment and recommendation of the website. CRITERIA CONTENT Website is affiliated with a reputable organization. Learning goals/objectives are clearly stated. Learning activities are student-centered. Author/webmaster’s contact information is provided. Content information is accurate and bias free. Content information is reliable. Content information is up to date. Content information is grade/age appropriate. Grammar and spelling are accurate. Website information complies with copyright laws. Bibliographic references are provided. Website provides high-level user interactivity. Subtotal: 13 14 15 16 DESIGN Overall screen display is visually pleasing. Text is legible. Multimedia enhances learning. Multimedia elements work properly. Subtotal: 17 18 19 20 NAVIGATION All links work properly. All links are clearly labeled. A site map is provided. Website is easy to navigate. Subtotal: GRAND TOTAL (Content + Design + Navigation): Excellent: Above 90 Good: 75-89 Fair: 60-74 RATING 4 3 2 X X X X X X X X X X X 55/60 points 5 4 3 2 x x x x 20/20 points 5 4 3 2 x x x x 20/20 points 95 /100 points

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

5 x

1

1

1

Poor: Below 60

Rationale for recommendation: Write a couple of paragraphs to 1) summarize the evaluation result, 2) make a recommendation for use, not use or use with caution of this website in your teaching, and 3) provide a rationale to support your recommendation. .

Web Site Evaluation Form 1) Website Title: Enthusiastic About Edison
Target Learner: 3rd Grader Evaluator: Jillian Myers URL: _http://questgarden.com/41/48/7/061112165309/ Subject/topic: Date: 10/30/09

Instruction: Use the following criteria to rate the quality of the website of your choice (1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest). Be sure to provide a rationale to support your judgment and recommendation of the website. CRITERIA CONTENT Website is affiliated with a reputable organization. Learning goals/objectives are clearly stated. Learning activities are student-centered. Author/webmaster’s contact information is provided. Content information is accurate and bias free. Content information is reliable. Content information is up to date. Content information is grade/age appropriate. Grammar and spelling are accurate. Website information complies with copyright laws. Bibliographic references are provided. Website provides high-level user interactivity. Subtotal: 13 14 15 16 DESIGN Overall screen display is visually pleasing. Text is legible. Multimedia enhances learning. Multimedia elements work properly. Subtotal: 17 18 19 20 NAVIGATION All links work properly. All links are clearly labeled. A site map is provided. Website is easy to navigate. Subtotal: GRAND TOTAL (Content + Design + Navigation): Excellent: Above 90 Good: 75-89 Fair: 60-74 RATING 4 3 2 x

5 x x X X

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

X X X X X x X 54/60 points 5 4 3 2 x x x x 20/20 points 5 4 3 2 X X X X 20 /20 points 94 /100 points

1

1

Poor: Below 60

Rationale for recommendation: Write a couple of paragraphs to 1) summarize the evaluation result, 2) make a recommendation for use, not use or use with caution of this website in your teaching, and 3) provide a rationale to support your recommendation. .