7 views

Uploaded by Taha Hashmi

aircraft

- External Aerodynamics Simulations for the MIT D8 “Double-Bubble” Aircraft Design
- AEROPLANES by J. S. Zerbe.pdf
- The Aeroplane - A. Fage
- Aerospace Engineering
- Army Aviation Digest - Mar 1983
- HL-10 First Rocket Flight
- Ground Effect
- Aeroplanes by James Slough Zerbe
- DH B4 Andrews AFB Logs-Timelines Fdr- Interview Leslie Filson and Capt Rasmussen Sass and Igor
- 4136.fullAutomatic aeroelastic devices in the wings of a steppe eagle Aquila nipalensis
- Weight and Balance[1]
- Valve Theory 2
- Design of the Subsonic Passenger Aircraft
- Water Tunnel Airfoil Analysis
- Aeronautical Engineering Scheme 2013
- The 19th Chesapeake Sailing Yacht Symposium
- Thrush S2R R-1340 Maintenence Manual
- engineering to new heights
- aero
- List of Organisations SAR147 Apr2012

You are on page 1of 39

Submitted to: Dr. Hesham Ibrahim

Due Date: 6 JUNE 2012

Nabiya Hilal 200821018

Roshan Akthar 200821027

Sidra Younis 200822099

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 2 6 June 2012

Abstract

Stability is essential to flying and is usually assumed to be especially problematic

in flapping flight. If so, problems of stability may have presented a particular hurdle to

the evolution of flapping flight. However, various flapping flight aircrafts have been

researched like MAVs and NAVs. MAVs allow military personnel to pursue

reconnaissance objectives and deliver payloads without placing soldiers in dangerous

situations, and could also be used for civilian purposes such as chemical agent

detection at hazardous sites or crop dusting. As seems to be the path taken by most

technology, an effort to reduce the size while maintaining a viable and useful UAV has

been underway since the start of the century. These systems involve highly complicated

physics surrounding the flapping wing motion and unusual characteristics due to a

flapping requirement not normally associated with conventional aircraft.

To that end this study focuses on examining the various models and physical

parameters of Micro Aerial Vehicles (MAVs) that are considered in various other

studies. This particular study primarily also focuses on determining the stability in

flapping wings Micro aerial vehicles aircraft (MAVs) by analyzing static and dynamic

models with certain variation in various parameters. According to the results, the aircraft

achieved the static stability by incorporating a dummy tail in it such that the destabilizing

effect of the wing was compensated with the stabilizing effect from the tail. Stability

derivatives have also been used to calculate the dynamic response of the aircraft under

specific conditions. The results observed are highly in line with the theory and

calculations reveal a statically stable aircraft exhibiting dynamic stability also under

different configuration parameters. The approach in terms of static stability of the aircraft

also takes into account the assumption that the aircraft behaves similar to the fixed wing

aircraft in the forward flight. Using the empirical coefficients, the aircraft was designed

using stability techniques. However, current stability concepts in aircraft design are

limited to the fixed wing aircraft field. The aerodynamics of the flapping wing flight has

also been discussed wherein the variation of forces has been analyzed with a variation

of the flapping angle.

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 3 6 June 2012

Table of Contents

1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 8

2. Micro Aerial Vehicles (MAVs) ............................................................................................. 9

3. Literature Review ...............................................................................................................10

4. Geometrical Analysis .........................................................................................................14

5. Static Stability ....................................................................................................................18

5.1. Results for Static Stability of Flapping Wing MAV ....................................................19

6. Dynamic Stability................................................................................................................21

6.1. Dynamic Model ...................................................................................................... ..22

6.2. Results for Dynamic Stability of Flapping Wing MAV ...............................................25

7. Longitudinal Approximations...............................................................................................29

7.1. Results for Longitudinal Approximations ..................................................................32

8. Conclusion, Shortcomings and Future work .......................................................................34

9. References ........................................................................................................................35

APPENDIX

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 4 6 June 2012

List of Figures

Figure 1: The microbat (Davenport, 2007) .................................................................................. 9

Figure 2: Body Frame Coordinate system (Davenport, 2007) ....................................................14

Figure 3: Ellipse shape wing .....................................................................................................14

Figure 4: Parameters position ...................................................................................................15

Figure 5: Wing Contribution to Static Stability ...........................................................................19

Figure 6: Tail Contribution to Static Stability ..............................................................................20

Figure 7: Static Stability of MAV ................................................................................................21

Figure 8: Flow at the wing (Davenport, 2007) ............................................................................23

Figure 9: Stroke Variation with Time .........................................................................................25

Figure 10: Stroke Direction Variation .........................................................................................26

Figure 11: Lift Coefficient Curve ................................................................................................27

Figure 12: Drag Coefficient Curve .............................................................................................28

List of Tables

Table 1: List of Parameters .......................................................................................................17

Table 2: Longitudinal Derivatives ..............................................................................................31

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 5 6 June 2012

NOMENCLATURE

Symbol Description

Sx Total area of surface x (x = w for wing, x = t for tail) (m

2

)

Sexp,x Total exposed area for surface x (m

2

)

A Aspect ratio

Tail taper ratio

LE

Tail leading edge sweep (rad)

C/4

Tail quarter chord sweep (rad)

Cw Wing root chord length (m)

Crt Tail root chord length (m)

Ctt Tail tip chord length (m)

c

t

Tail mean chord length (m)

bw Total wingspan (m)

bt Total tailspan (m)

cht Horizontal tail volume coefficient

Lt Distance between wing and tail aerodynamic centers (m)

Lf Length of fuselage (m)

Mcg Resultant moment about the aircraft center of gravity (Nm)

Lx Total lift at surface x (N)

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 6 6 June 2012

Xp Position p on the aircraft; measured from the nose of the aircraft

q Dynamic pressure (kg/ms

2

)

qt Tail dynamic pressure (kg/ms

2

)

Fluid density (kg/m

3

)

V

2

Square of ambient fluid velocity (m

2

/s)

Cmcg Moment coefficient about the center of gravity

CLx Lift coefficient for surface x

M Mach number

Dx Fuselage diameter at x

CLx Coefficient of lift derivative for surface x

CDx Coefficient of drag derivative for surface x

CD

0

Parasite drag constant

CL Coefficient for empirical lift coefficient derivative

CD Coefficient for empirical lift coefficient derivative

Cf Coefficient derivative function

m Aircraft mass (kg)

g Gravitational constant (9.8 m/s

2

)

Ixx Specific principle moment of inertia (m

2

)

eq

Equivalent angle of attack at the wing (rad)

Aircraft and tail angle of attack (rad)

0t

Tail incidence angle (rad)

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 7 6 June 2012

0

Wing pitch angle; control input (rad)

Veq Equivalent fluid velocity at the wing mean chord (m/s)

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 8 6 June 2012

1. Introduction

Flapping wing flight is a relatively new area of study in engineering. Researchers

are looking to flapping flight as a potential source for the next generation of surveillance

vehicles. Recently, micro-air vehicles (MAVs) have gained a lot of interest of both

aerospace engineers and biologists studying animal flight. Potential applications for

MAVs, both military and civilian, are numerous. MAVs may employ fixed wings, rotary

wings or flapping wings. Flapping wings of the MAV are used for stability and lift

generation. An ornithopter is an aircraft that uses flapping wing motion to fly. This type

of flight offers potential advantages over fixed-wing flight, such as maneuverability, at

slow speeds (1-40m/s). Natural ornithopter range in size from small flying insects to

large birds, and flap their wings from about 5 to 200Hz. (Zbikowski. 2004). In this

regard, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) with their flapping wings are becoming

increasingly important on the modern military and civilian scene.

While biological inspiration suggests that flapping wing flight offers unique

performance benefits, aerodynamists put forth the point that as the wings are reduced in

size, a transition to low Reynolds number aerodynamics occurs, resulting in decreased

aerofoil performance. Most previous studies of flapping wing flight revolve around

understanding and defining the aerodynamic effects associated with the unsteady

characteristics of a flapping wing. However, even after an adequate model or

approximation is made to account for these phenomena, the stability of the aircraft can

still be in question. Aircraft stability is not only dependent on its aerodynamic

characteristics like lift and drag, but also on the geometric aspects of the aircraft.

Therefore, this study aims at developing a straightforward and feasible approach to

design a stable flapping wing aircraft. Also it develops an approach to design a statically

stable flapping wing aircraft while analyzing the dynamic stability trends at the same

time as well as to analyze the trade-offs between stability and lift of a flapping wing

MAV, if any.

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 9 6 June 2012

2. Micro Aerial Vehicles (MAVs)

The Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA) defines a Micro Air

Vehicle (MAV) as an aircraft limited in all of its dimensions to 15 cm (McMichael, 1996).

This size limitation is meant to allow the vehicle to operate in a confined space such as

those presented by an urban canyon or building interior. While any type of aircraft could

theoretically be adapted to fit the MAV definition, rotor craft and flapping wing designs

are particularly well adapted for the high agility and maneuverability requirements of this

difficult operating environment. Furthermore, for concealment in plain sight, flapping

wing designs are particularly well-suited in that they can mimic designs we see in nature

and thereby have the potential to hide in plain sight. Of particular interest in

demonstrating these capabilities are recent developments in highly agile, hover

capable, flapping-wing aircraft that mimic small fliers in nature such as Aerovironment's

Nano Hummingbird. (Nano Hummingbird, 2011)

Figure 1: The microbat (Davenport, 2007)

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 10 6 June 2012

Examining the desired flight capabilities presented by Defense Advanced

Research Projects Agency (DARPA), it is evident that an aircraft that meets these

objectives would be ideal for use in the current urban warfare environment. Like many

previous technologies that began as military concepts, a capable and effective MAV

would undoubtedly find civilian uses as well; a MAV could be sent down mine shafts to

determine oxygen levels or one with thermal imagery capabilities could be used in

search and rescue missions in hazardous or inaccessible locations. The requirements

and constraints of the project are:

Requirements

Fly using flapping wing technology

Be structurally sound

Constraints

Frequency (20 Hz)

Weight: close to 10 g

Wingspan: less than 8 cm

Slow flight: 10 m/s

3. Literature Review

Scientific exploration into the aerodynamics of flapping-wing flight is limited, but

has recently been on the rise.

Orlowki (Orlowski, 2011) analyzed the flight dynamics, stability, and control of a

model flapping wing micro air vehicle with a focus on the inertial and mass effects of the

wings on the position and orientation of the body. A multi-body, flight dynamics model is

derived from first principles. He predicted that the multi-body model predicts significant

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 11 6 June 2012

differences in the position and orientation of the flapping wing micro air vehicle, when

compared to a flight dynamics model based on the standard aircraft, or six degree of

freedom, equations of motion. He concluded that the linear momentum effects of the

wings are always important in terms of the inertial position of the flapping wing micro air

vehicle. Above a flapping frequency of approximately 30-40 Hz, the mass and inertial

effects of the wings on the orientation of the body can be neglected.

Evans (Evans, 2001) did an experimental investigation into the stability of a

flapping wing micro air vehicle in which a three-degree of freedom force balance was

designed and constructed to measure the forces and moments exhibited by a set of

flapping wings through 180' of rotation at varied free-stream velocities. A total of four

case studies were performed, and each revealed the vehicle had inherent stability. The

presence of a tail on the vehicle produced only marginal effects. He concluded that the

importance thing was the placement of the vehicle center of gravity with respect to the

wings. A preferred distance of 3.5 cm from the c.g. to the leading edge aft the wings

allowed for stable flight under all cases studied.

Davenport (Davenport, 2007) used experimental data to estimate the flight

capabilities of a flapping wing nano aerial vehicle (NAV), estimate the power required to

provide such flight, and develop a controller approach for future use in the design of this

aircraft. He used the empirical coefficients, the aircraft was designed using stability

techniques. He concluded that the power required by both wings during the steady level

flight was 1.65 W.

Leonard (Leonard, 2011) studied the equations of motion are modeled through a

quasi co-ordinate Lagrangian scheme while the aerodynamic forces are calculated

using quasi steady potential flow aerodynamics. He calculated the stability of the trim is

calculated and examined using stroke-averaged and Floquet theory and concluded that

Inflow and viscosity were found to have large effects on the stability of the system and

models accounting for the two should be included in future flight dynamic models.

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 12 6 June 2012

Bierling (Bierling, 2009) presents a flight dynamic model for flapping wing insects

and/or MAVs. It assumes a rigid-body fuselage with wings that are attached at a single

rotating joint (that move with a prescribed motion). The aerodynamic model used in his

analysis is a quasi- steady model. A spline interpolation was used to approximate the

observed data for the wing kinematics and this data was used to generate the final

equations of motion (added to the nonlinear equations already derived from the Newton-

Euler equations). A trim algorithm was used to calculate the periodic steady-state and

Floquet analysis used to calculate flight dynamic modes and stability to small

perturbation. The stability estimates from Floquet analysis were close to those from the

stroke-averaged analysis except for slight differences in the lateral eigenvalues and the

hovering case. This means that the quasi-steady approach may be used for

simplification of the dynamics when necessary. In general the results pointed towards

unstable or slightly unstable eigenvalues necessitating active control but also providing

opportunities for high maneuverability. Bierling also concluded that the close agreement

between the quasi-steady analysis and the Floquet results might be due to the low wing

mass of the Drosophila model and that larger wing masses would create larger

differences in the two analyses. The results neglect certain unsteady affects as part of

the quasi-steady assumption and the results are only valid for the Drosophila wing with

corresponding flapping frequency and Reynolds number.

Meirovitch and Tuzcu (Meirovitch, 2005) formulate the equations of motion for a

flexible aircraft, integrating together dynamics, structural vibrations, aerodynamics, and

controls. Of particular interest to this thesis was the formulation of the dynamic

equations of the aircraft, treated as a multi-body system using quasi-coordinates. The

motions of the body are broken into six degrees of freedom (based on the body axes

attached to the un-deformed fuselage) and combined with deformations of the flexible

components.

Deng et al. (Deng, 2006) worked on mathematical modeling of flapping flight

MAVs in the inch size range. In this particular work they worked on the full system

dynamic models, with particular emphasis on their differences with respect to traditional

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 13 6 June 2012

fixed and rotary wing MAVs. The particular models included the wing-thorax dynamics,

aerodynamics (full flapping model at low Reynolds number), body dynamics, and a

biomimetic sensing system. The mathematical models were derived from analytic

solutions, empirical models, and biological data. These are integrated into algorithms for

wing aerodynamics, body dynamics, actuator, dynamics, external environment, and

flight control, which together make up the Virtual Insect Flight Simulator (VIFS).

Sun and Xiong (Sun and Xiong, 2005) studied the longitudinal flight stability of

hovering bumblebees using eigenvalue analysis to solve the equations of motion. The

aerodynamic derivatives necessary for the analysis were computed using computational

fluid dynamics (CFD). For longitudinally-disturbed motion they identified three natural

modes though the instabilities arising from these modes were all such that the growing

time was much greater than the wing beat period and as such the bumblebee would

have plenty of time to adjust wing motion. Sun and Xiong also explain the physical

meaning of these motions and how the bee could easily overcome the instability that

arises from the unstable mode.

Doman et al. (Doman, 2010) developed a method of controlling a flapping wing

micro air vehicle through varying the velocity profiles of each wing. This was

accomplished through the use of a split cycle parameter that shifted the peak of the

flapping cycle while maintaining the same period. Through theoretical analysis and

simulation this method of control is shown the be capable of control over the vertical

and horizontal body forces as well as the rolling and yawing moment when just

controlling each wing's flapping frequency and the split cycle parameter.

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 14 6 June 2012

4. Geometrical Analysis

Figure 2: Body Frame Coordinate system (Davenport, 2007)

In the analysis the wing taken is designed to be a flat-plate airfoil with a surface

area that resembles half of an ellipse. Assuming that sideslip, fluid velocity along the y-

axis, is negligible and that all maneuvers will be about the pitch axis, in the xz-plane, it

is immediately apparent that a vertical tail is not necessary for this model.

Figure 3: Ellipse shape wing

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 15 6 June 2012

The aspect ratio for the wing is calculated using formula:

Here the value of the aspect ratio using properties of one wing is half of the value

when both wings are considered. For this study, the aspect ratio was calculated for one

wing and that ratio was also used for the tail. With a known chord length and wingspan,

the area of a full ellipse (since both wings are used) was calculated by using the above

equation such that Sw = 0.002945

Figure 4: Parameters position

and

forces generated by the wing and tail respectively, and

, and

are the

positions of the aircraft center of mass, aerodynamic center of the wing, and

aerodynamic center of the tail measured from the nose of the aircraft respectively. The

moment about the center of gravity is found using equation:

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 16 6 June 2012

, and

Where,

is the wing

coefficient of lift,

the ambient fluid density and

, the eq.

becomes

The dynamic pressure ratio can be approximated as

the derivative is taken with respect to the aircraft angle of attack, , the moment

equation becomes

The partial derivative term here arises since the coefficient of lift of the tail cannot

be directly differentiated with respect to the aircraft angle of attack , due to upwash or

downwash effects that arise from the deflection of the ambient fluid as it flows over the

wing. In other words, the angle of attack at the tail is not the same as the angle of attack

of the aircraft, and also changes in an unknown manner with respect to aircraft angle of

attack variations.

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 17 6 June 2012

Here the coefficient of lift derivatives are taken to be C

Lw

= 5.244 and C

Lt

=

5.136. From empirical plots in (Raymer, 1999), the partial derivative term can be

conservatively estimated as

Other parameters include:

Table 1: List of Parameters

Parameters Symbol Data

Aircraft length (m)

0.075

Wing Area (m x m)

0.000736

Tail Area (m x m)

0.0000944

Mass (kg) M 0.01

Wing Root Chord (m)

0.0125

Wingspan (m)

0.075

Tail span (m)

0.027

Tail Root Chord (m)

0.005

Tail Tip Chord (m)

0.002

Wing Lift Coefficient Derivative

5.244

Tail Lift Coefficient Derivative

5.136

Aircraft positions

0.0234525

0.02567

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 18 6 June 2012

0.0722025

Specific principle Moment of Inertia

0.00117

Frequency f 20 Hz

Weight W 10g

Velocity V 10m/s

5. Static Stability

A flapping aircraft may be said to be inherently stable if the forces acting on it

tend to restore it to equilibrium without any modification of the flapping cycle (Smith,

1952). For example, for an aircraft to be inherently stable in pitch, a disturbance from

equilibrium must passively induce an opposing pitching moment, so the inequality

must be true at equilibrium, where M is the total pitching moment about the centre of

gravity and

longitudinal body axis and the oncoming flow vector.

The kind of stability expressed by the equation, referring only to the direction of

the initial response, is termed static stability. Static stability is necessary for dynamic

stability, which refers to the damping of a disturbance over time.

Consider the case when Cm

= 0; for every change in the angle of attack the

aircraft is in static equilibrium as there are no net moments about the center of mass. If

Cm

> 0, there will be a net moment in the same direction so as to further increase the

angle of attack, and therefore the system will become unstable. Therefore, it is desirable

to have Cm

< 0, so for every change in the angle of attack, the aircraft will have a

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 19 6 June 2012

moment in the opposite direction to try and drive the resultant aircraft moment back to

zero.

Strictly speaking, a static analysis of stability cannot be applied where flapping or

deformation of the flight surfaces occurs, because dynamic changes in the forces could

couple with the aircraft's natural modes of motion. Such coupling is unlikely to occur if

the frequency of flapping or aero-elastic flutter is sufficiently high compared to the

aircraft's natural frequencies of motion. The dynamically changing forces will then

exhibit no resonance with the aircraft's gross motion and we may consider them to be

replaced by a quasi- static force like that on a rigid gliding body.

5.1. Results for Static Stability of Flapping Wing MAV

Figure 5 - Wing Contribution to Static Stability

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

C

m

Angle of Attack (degrees)

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 20 6 June 2012

Figure 5 represents the calculated wing contribution to the static stability of the

flapping wing MAV. As seen from the figure, the wing was found to have a destabilizing

effect with Cm

> 0.

Figure 6 - Tail Contribution to Static Stability

Figure 6 represents the calculated tail contribution to the static stability of the

flapping wing MAV. As seen from the figure, the tail was found to have a stabilizing

effect with Cm

< 0 and Cm

0

> 0, which must be greater than zero for static stability.

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

C

m

Angle of Attack (degrees)

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 21 6 June 2012

Figure 7 - Static Stability of MAV

Figure 7 represents the C

m

curve of the flapping wing MAV. As seen from the

figure, the MAV is statically stable with Cm

< 0 and Cm

0

= 0.0144, which must be

greater than zero for static stability.

6. Dynamic Stability

There are many challenges involved in the study of flapping wing flight. At low

speeds, there is a lack of significant lift generated from oncoming airflow. Hence, lift and

thrust must be generated predominantly from flapping.

For an aircraft to be dynamically stable, it is essential that it be statically stable

with respect to changes in both attitude and velocity. However, flapping-wing flight

introduces oscillations to the system that appear as large sinusoidal disturbances. As

-20

-18

-16

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

C

m

Angle of Attack (degrees)

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 22 6 June 2012

the frequency of flapping changes, both the mean of the forcing input from the wings

and the amplitude, frequency, and phase of individual sinusoidal components of the

forcing input from the wings vary nonlinearly.

The nonlinearity of the ornithopter system, as well as forcing input to the system,

creates difficulty for stability and control of the ornithopter. The forcing input created by

a wings flapping motion is also vibrational and semi-periodic. However, stability and

control of nonlinear systems via vibrational, oscillatory, or periodic inputs has been

intensively researched.

Consider while driving a car, if a hand is held out of window and is held still, no

lift force will act on it. But under the same situation when it is held at any upward angle,

there will be a force felt up. An increased force is observed with an increasing the angle

of attack. As known, the coefficients of lift and drag are a function of angle of attack.

Others factors like aspect ratio, taper ratio and wing sweep also affect the derivatives

but are usually considered negligible. This is the reason the derivatives like lift and drag

coefficients are important in the analysis.

6.1. Dynamic Model

The dynamic model of the flapping wing MAV is given by empirical relations. The

mathematical model can be written up by following the sequence of equations.

The flapping velocity is given by

Where, is the stroke or the flapping angle,

wing tip, and is the flapping frequency.

The equivalent velocity at the thin airfoil changes with any change in the flapping

velocity

and

given as

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 23 6 June 2012

Now we define sn is a signum function that determines the sign of the flapping velocity

throughout the stroke. In other words, if the wing is in the upstroke, sn = 1 and if it is in

the downstroke sn = -1. Mathematically,

The effective angle of attack

Figure 8 - Flow at the wing (Davenport, 2007)

In this equation,

the wing measured from the x-axis, and is the inflow angle. The negative sign has to

be applied to the velocity

since a positive

Cartesian coordinate system.

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 24 6 June 2012

Now, the flapping coefficient, is also derived as

Using theses given equations, the lift and drag for the wing are computed as:

The terms for the lift and drag on the tail and wing are

With these given equations, overall forces and moments acting on the MAV can be

generated:

Now, if we use the small angle of attack theory, we can assume that

and

, and,

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 25 6 June 2012

6.2. Results for Dynamic Stability of Flapping Wing MAV

Figure 9 - Stroke Variation with Time

The graph shows the variation in the stroke angle with time. Since the frequency

is taken to be 20 Hz, one stroke cycle is expected to be completed in 0.05 seconds. As

can be seen, the initial position of the flapping wings is at -90 degrees. In a span of

0.025 seconds, it move to 90 degrees, and returns to -90 in the next 0.025 seconds.

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06

p

s

i

(

r

a

d

)

t (s)

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 26 6 June 2012

Figure 10 - Stroke Direction Variation

Figure 10 represents the graph showing the upstroke and down stroke of the

wings. As discussed earlier, the angle from -90 to 90 degrees represents the upstroke.

The second part of the cycle is the movement from 90 to -90 degrees, defining the down

stroke of the wing. This is obtained by the signum function.

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06

S

t

r

o

k

e

D

i

r

e

c

t

i

o

n

t (s)

Upstroke

Downstroke

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 27 6 June 2012

Figure 11 - Lift Coefficient Curve

The graph in Figure 11 shows the lift coefficient variation with time. As can be

seen, at time 0, and flapping angle of -90 degrees, there is a small amount of inherent

lift. Until an angle of 0 degrees, it decreases and rises to a maximum at 90 degrees of

flapping. During the downstroke, the lift decreases until about 0 degrees and increases

at -90. The lift generated by the downstroke motion is higher than that generated by the

upstroke motion. This is obvious since a downstroke motion increases the force in the

upward direction.

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06

C

L

w

t (s)

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 28 6 June 2012

Figure 12 - Drag Coefficient Curve

The curve generated for the drag is shown in Figure 12. The graph matches the

general trends of drag curves. As is notice, drag is at a maximum at a stroke angle of -

90 degrees and is the least at 90 degrees angle.

3.504

3.506

3.508

3.51

3.512

3.514

3.516

3.518

3.52

3.522

3.524

3.526

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06

D

r

a

g

C

o

e

f

f

i

c

i

c

e

n

t

t (s)

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 29 6 June 2012

7. Longitudinal Approximations

Most aircraft display two basic longitudinal modes that are excited whenever the

aircraft is disturbed from longitudinal equilibrium (Cook, 1997). One mode,the phugoid

is lightly damped in conventional aircraft and consists of a slow rise and fall

representing an interchange between kinetic and potential energy, during which the

angle of incidence remains approximately constant. The other mode is short period

heavily damped in conventional aircraft and of much shorter period, consisting mainly of

fast pitch oscillations. Reduced order approximations are available for both modes

(Cook, 1997).

The equations used to calculate frequency and damping ratio for phugoid and

short period are:

Long period (Phugoid)

Frequency:

Damping Ratio:

Short Period

Frequency:

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 30 6 June 2012

Damping Ratio:

Time to halving or doubling the amplitude:

Number of cycles to doubling or halving the amplitude:

Equations used to calculate longitudinal stability derivatives are

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 31 6 June 2012

Where,

The parameters for the calculation of these derivatives used are taken from

experimental values obtained for a Micro Air Vehicle from reference sources.

Table 2: Longitudinal Derivatives

Parameter Value

C

Lu

0

C

Du

0

C

mu

0

C

L

8.7162

C

D

0.2329

C

m

-0.3347

C

L0

-0.2443

C

D0

0.0836

C

m0

0.0144

C

mq

-6.0391

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 32 6 June 2012

7.1. Results for Longitudinal Approximations

Mid-Stroke (Flap Angle = 0 degrees)

Phugoid (Long Period):

Complex roots with real part negative

Under damped exponentially decaying sinusoidal motion

Eigenvalues -0.008 I 0.399

T half 86.63 s

N half 5.49

Period 15.75 s

Short Period:

Complex roots with real part negative

Under damped exponentially decaying sinusoidal motion

Eigenvalues -0.038 I 0.465

T half 18.24 s

N half 1.35

Period 13.51 s

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 33 6 June 2012

UpStroke & Downstroke (Flap Angle = 45 degrees & 90 degrees)

Phugoid (Long Period):

Complex roots with real part negative

Under damped exponentially decaying sinusoidal motion

Eigenvalues -0.038 I 0.466

T half 18.24 s

N half 1.35

Period 13.48 s

Short Period:

Two negative distinct real roots

Over damped exponentially decaying motion

Eigenvalues -0.028 , -5.684

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 34 6 June 2012

8. Conclusion, Shortcomings and Future work

The report consists of stability analysis limited to static and longitudinal behavior.

The static stability analysis does not consider the effect of the flapping angle at an

instantaneous time. Future efforts can be made to realize a relation between the static

stability and the change in flapping angle.

Also, the lateral stability of a flapping wing aircraft was extremely complex consisting

of unfamiliar parameters and seemed to be beyond the scope of this course. Hence,

analysis was conducted to determine just the longitudinal stability of the aircraft using

stability derivatives.

The pitch angle of the wings is expected to change with varying flapping angle due

to change in velocity. However, the analysis was considered a fixed value of pitch angle

for the ease of MATLAB coding. The definition of the order of arrays seemed to pose a

problem since experience of working with MATLAB was limited.

In addition, the use of the signum function to define the motion of the flapping wings

is inaccurate. A continuous analytical velocity function of the wing can be substituted

into the calculation of

eq

instead of using the s

n

v

f

term that causes discontinuities and

irregularities in the results.

The dynamic model could also be improved by quantifying a number of terms that

were neglected in this study. Fuselage lift and drag, forces due to sideslip, damping,

and the inertial terms corresponding to the actual aircraft shape and its wings could be

modeled to enhance the system model.

Neglected vortex effects which is one of the main factors in determining the behavior

of flapping wings, means aerodynamic quantification is not as accurate.

Overall, the report discusses a simplistic flapping wing MAVs stability in order to

gain a better knowledge about a technology newly developed and still being perfected.

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 35 6 June 2012

9. References

Bierling, T. and Patil, M., Nonlinear Dynamics and Stability of Flapping-Wing Flight,

International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, 2009.

COOK, M. V. (1997). Flight Dynamics: Principles. London: Arnold.

Davenport, W, 2007, DEVELOPMENT, MODELING, AND SIMULATION OF A NANO

AERIAL VEHICLE USING EMPIRICAL DATA, UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-ROLLA.

Deng, X., Schenato, L., Wu, W. C., and Sastry, S. S., Flapping Flight for Biomimetic

Robotic Insects: Part I - System Modeling, IEEE Transaction on Robotics , Vol. 22, No.

4, August 2006, pp. 776-788.

Evans, M, 2001, Stability of Flapping wing Micro Air Vehicle, University of Toronto.

Leonard, B, 2011, Flapping Wing Flight Dynamic Modeling, Blacksburg, Virginia

McMichael, J. M. and Francis, M. S., Micro Air Vehicles - Toward a new Dimension in

Flight, Tech. rep, Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency TTO Document, 1996.

Meirovitch, L. and Tuzcu, I., Integrated Approach to the Dynamics and Control of

Maneuvering Flexible Aircraft, Tech. rep., NASA and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and

State University, 2005.

Nano Hummingbird, Website, 2011.

Orlowski, C, 2011, Flapping Wing Micro Air Vehicles: An Analysis of the Importance of

the Mass of the Wings to Flight Dynamics, Stability, and Control, The University of

Michigan

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 36 6 June 2012

R. Zbikowski, Sensor-rich feedback control: a new paradigm for flight control inspired

by insect agility, Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, IEEE, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 19

26, 2004.

Raymer, D, Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, 3rd Ed., AIAA Educational Series,

1999.

SMITH, J, (1952), The importance of the nervous system in the evolution of animal

flight, Evolution 6, 127}129.

Sun, M. and Xiong, Y., Dynamic flight stability of a hovering bumblebee, The Journal

of Experimental Biology , Vol. 208, 2005, pp. 447-459.

T. N. Pornsin-Sirirak, S. W. Lee, H. Nassef, J. Grasmeyer, Y. C. Tai, C. M. Ho, and M.

Keennon, Mems wing technology for a battery-powered ornithopter, 2000, pp. 799

804.

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 37 6 June 2012

APPENDIX

FLAPPING DYNAMICS MATLAB CODE

%Cdu=0;

%Cd0=.0836;

%u0=10;

%m=.01;

%S=.000736;

%------------------------------------------

%CLu=0;

%CL0=.2443;

%CDa=-.2329;

%CLa=8.7162;

%Cma=-.3347;

%------------------------------------------

%c=.0125;

%------------------------------------------

%Xwdot=0;

%Zwdot=0;

%Iy=.00117;

%Mu=0;

%Xq=0;

%Zq=0;

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 38 6 June 2012

%Cmad=-6.23;

%Cmq=-6.0391;

%------------------------------------------

%------------------------------------------

%------------------------------------------

t=0:.01:.05;

a=5;

freq=sin(2*20*t*3.142);

lc=.0375;

psi=(-90/57.3)*cos((7200*t)/57.3);

%------------------------------------------

vf=2*lc*20*psi;

sn=sign(freq);

snmanual=[0 1 1 -1 -1 0];

vz=[10*sin(a/57.3)];

vx=[10*cos(a/57.3)];

Veq=(vx.^2+vf.^2+vz.^2).^0.5;

cf=1+cos(4*3.142*20*t);

Vztot=(vf.*snmanual);

Beta=atan((Vztot+vz)/(-vx));

Alphaeq=((a/57.3)*snmanual)-Beta;

sw=.000736;

Veq2=Veq.^2;

Stability of a Flapping-Wing MAV Aircraft Stability & Control

Dr. Hesham Ibrahim 39 6 June 2012

L1=.5*1.225*3.41445*sw*cf(1)*Alphaeq(1)*Veq2(1);

L2=.5*1.225*3.41445*sw*cf(2)*Alphaeq(2)*Veq2(2);

L3=.5*1.225*3.41445*sw*cf(3)*Alphaeq(3)*Veq2(3);

L4=.5*1.225*3.41445*sw*cf(4)*Alphaeq(4)*Veq2(4);

L5=.5*1.225*3.41445*sw*cf(5)*Alphaeq(5)*Veq2(5);

L6=.5*1.225*3.41445*sw*cf(6)*Alphaeq(6)*Veq2(6);

L=[L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6];

Cl=[L1*(.5*1.225*Veq2(1)*sw)^-1 L2*(.5*1.225*Veq2(2)*sw)^-1

L3*(.5*1.225*Veq2(3)*sw)^-1

L4*(.5*1.225*Veq2(4)*sw)^-1 L5*(.5*1.225*Veq2(5)*sw)^-1

L6*(.5*1.225*Veq2(6)*sw)^-1];

Dw=0.5*1.225*Veq2*CD*Cf*Alphaeq*sw

Cd=Dw/(0.5*1.225*Veq^2*sw)

Lt=0.5*1.225*V^2*CLt*(20)*st

Dt=0.5*1.225*V^2*[CD0+CLt*(20)^2]st

Fx=Dw*cos(Beta)+Lw*sin(Beta)+Dt*cos(20)-Lt*sin(20)

Fz= Lwcos(Beta)-Dw*sin(Beta)+Dt*sin(20)+Lt*cos(20)

My=(Lw*cos(Beta)-Dwsin(Beta)*Xacw-[Dt*sin(20)+Lt*cos(20)]*Xact

- External Aerodynamics Simulations for the MIT D8 “Double-Bubble” Aircraft DesignUploaded byMike Shahrokh
- AEROPLANES by J. S. Zerbe.pdfUploaded byCarmen Diaconu
- The Aeroplane - A. FageUploaded byhawk30
- Aerospace EngineeringUploaded byengineeringtips
- Army Aviation Digest - Mar 1983Uploaded byAviation/Space History Library
- HL-10 First Rocket FlightUploaded byBob Andrepont
- Ground EffectUploaded byMohammadhossein Nirooei
- Aeroplanes by James Slough ZerbeUploaded byDuane Van Schoonhoven
- DH B4 Andrews AFB Logs-Timelines Fdr- Interview Leslie Filson and Capt Rasmussen Sass and IgorUploaded by9/11 Document Archive
- 4136.fullAutomatic aeroelastic devices in the wings of a steppe eagle Aquila nipalensisUploaded byJoe Kenyon
- Weight and Balance[1]Uploaded byMatej Trtnik
- Valve Theory 2Uploaded byYuda Satria
- Design of the Subsonic Passenger AircraftUploaded byBenadict Bensiger
- Water Tunnel Airfoil AnalysisUploaded byPjackson2014
- Aeronautical Engineering Scheme 2013Uploaded byleksremesh
- The 19th Chesapeake Sailing Yacht SymposiumUploaded byjpsaliou
- Thrush S2R R-1340 Maintenence ManualUploaded byarizonaflyer1_732976
- engineering to new heightsUploaded byapi-245402495
- aeroUploaded bynanduslns07
- List of Organisations SAR147 Apr2012Uploaded byTan Lian Kiat
- GetTRDocUploaded byGaurav Sikka
- 021_Chapter 4_L15Uploaded bynanduslns07
- Assignment PrereqisiteUploaded byNeerajPal
- ZP2_A_EUUploaded byRaquel Alexandre
- LabReport_CpDistributionOfAerofoil.pdfUploaded bymatthias.s.sommer3656
- 80701675Uploaded byseptia
- 23_Class_LLT.pdfUploaded byebw
- Cpl AerodynamicUploaded byMuhammad Adnan Arumpadatu
- Amcat Sample Paper1Uploaded byDasu Vaishnavi
- The Aeroplane StroyboardUploaded byMuhairi Mohd

- Transient AnalysisUploaded byMaheswaran Muthaiyan
- Rocker Switches Part 2Uploaded byTaha Hashmi
- A318 6_51-57 DIFF L3 (1 CMP)Uploaded byTaha Hashmi
- Strategic Position Techniques and Strategic Planning TechniquesUploaded byTaha Hashmi
- Template for Proposals EnUploaded byquark87
- tumor and cancer causesUploaded byTaha Hashmi
- Research Paper- Analysis Final CopyUploaded byTaha Hashmi
- Aircraft Data ComparisonUploaded byTaha Hashmi
- Bridge Project Wb 2011 EngUploaded byjasbir999
- Stabilty Presentation Final(Edit)Uploaded byTaha Hashmi
- optimisation of gas cycleUploaded byTaha Hashmi
- model turboet projectUploaded byTaha Hashmi
- Advanced Fuel & Ignition2Uploaded byGopala Krushna Nayak
- Cycle AnalysisUploaded byTaha Hashmi

- Chen HF Pure Shakedown and Limit Analysis of 90 Degree Pipe Bends Under Internal Pressure Cyclic in Plane Bending and Cyclic Thermal Loading May 2011Uploaded by_Asylum_
- Chapter 16 WavesUploaded byNatalia Whyte
- Offset and Linear Spread Geometry in the MASW MethodUploaded byWilfredo Sulla Huillca
- e7 AnswersUploaded byRohit Mundat
- Bow%20StabilisationUploaded byMohamad Nadzri Yahaya
- HydraulicsUploaded byThais Salles
- Example 1 Gravity DamUploaded byeph
- Failure Analysis and Design.docxUploaded bydselvakumaran
- Beam Design for Moment Asd Lrfd (Example)Uploaded byAgustín Yáñez Quezada
- The Crust of the Earth is Constantly MovingUploaded byapi-3808551
- 12075Uploaded byAshutosh Vashishtha
- Literature Review on circulating fluidized bedsUploaded byRajiv Kr Gogoi
- Wave OpticsUploaded byMohit Narvariya
- PLTB_Liquid_Help_2014.pdfUploaded byiqtorres
- [Heat Transfer] Chapter 5Uploaded byOkoni Demas
- rigid frames analysisUploaded byganesh_withucad
- MriUploaded byQassem Mohaidat
- PhysicsUploaded byJAYAKRISHNAN M
- TWO-STAGE AIR COMPRESSORUploaded byEjad Afifi
- free vibration of variable stiffness composite laminateUploaded byAdnan Ahmed
- JEE 2017Uploaded byAditya Pratap Singh
- Heat exchanger effectiveness.pdfUploaded byfrilofh
- Trans JourUploaded byKhushal Bhanderi
- Pure Bending.pdfUploaded byAlvin Smith
- Contribution of Transverse Bulkheads FEMUploaded byKevin Patrón Hernandez
- Study of Forced Double PendulumsUploaded byrizkibizniz
- Exam 3 Concept Qs Super Important to PrintUploaded bysunnyopg
- Nonlinear Characteristics of Single Reed InstrumentsUploaded byStephan Vermeersch
- matrix estructural.pdfUploaded byEgre Chp
- RA 11-II AnswersUploaded byBao-Ngoc Hoang