2 views

Uploaded by susuzirmak

save

- Topic10-SeismicDesignofSteelStructuresHandouts
- STRUCTURAL REVIEWER.pdf
- 02. Παραδειγμα Λυγισμού.pdf
- The Lateral-Torsional Buckling of Unrestrained Steel Beams in Fire
- HSC
- C Column Interaction Slender2
- ENDPLMC9
- Report
- Portal Frames - Steelconstruction
- Gen 7001
- Simple Formulas for Laminated Cylinders
- SPECIAL REPORT_ New Method Assesses the Risk of Upheaval Buckling for Submerged Pipelines - Print This Page
- Structural Reviewer 2
- ENDPLMC9
- Manual for Columns and Struts Apparatus
- bookchapter_fka05
- column extract easysteelstructuralpropertiesbook 1
- ICASS09 Programme
- Engineering Calculation Pipeline
- Masonry Design Example
- MIEC Mobility En
- 2 Literature Review
- SPE-19923-MS
- Columns
- Buckling and wrinkling during strip conveying in processing lines.pdf
- r783
- PDHLibrary-History of Steel Beam-Column Equations
- design of footings.pdf
- ABS Buckling Requirements for Offshore
- curved beam Design.docx
- Disciplina
- 0111
- pat-conei-2018.docx
- ACTA DE ENTREGA varios 2018.docx
- j
- Aula 00
- Neoliberalismo_Perry Anderson.pdf
- Institucional BO
- Parques Nacionales de la Argentina
- 18 Celulamuscularesqueletica 121214015523 Phpapp02
- Anatomia Del Amor - Helen E Fisher
- bu viee
- TAC - URBANISMO E HABITAÇÃO.docx
- Active Passive Voices2
- Semana 03 - Método Símplex
- ramdeo conclave
- Pempek Dos Sederhana
- acoplamiento
- html11
- yodeleeeseee.txt
- IMSLP475004-PMLP06107-Partitur_D-B_Mus._ms._Bach_P_224.pdf
- POTENSI PEMBANGKIT LISTRIK MINI POLISI TIDUR.pdf
- Coconut Oil -- 7 Reasons to Take Two Tablespoons Per Day_f
- ANSI-ASQ-Z1-4-2008-Sampling-Procedures-and-Tables-for-Inspection.pdf
- to supplement int
- Fichas JDA Bottlebol tamaño grande
- Do Cidadão
- PEDOMAN IMUNISASI
- tecnologiasdelainformacionylacomunicacion.doc
- Lider vs Dictador
- Design of Steel Structures
- Som
- Safe Kitabi r8
- Civil Engineering Formulas
- Eos300d Cug En
- Deprem Şartnamesi
- yapiyonetimi
- DBYBHY-2007
- yapiyonetimi

You are on page 1of 5

51 Design of Steel Structures

Columns in Frames

Page 1

Columns in Frames

The subject of effective length was introduced in the previous sections and some suggested

K -values are listed in AISC/LRFD Speciﬁcation Table C-C2.1. These factors were developed

for columns with certain idealized conditions of end restraint which may be very different

from practical design conditions. As discussed before, the connections between the beams

and columns change the values of K . The deﬂection shape of the entire structure has to be

evaluated using a statically indeterminate analysis.

Perhaps a few explanatory remarks should be made at this point, deﬁning sidesway as it

pertains to effective lengths. For this discussion sidesway refers to a type of buckling. In

statically indeterminate structures sidesway occurs where the frames deﬂect laterally due to

the presence of lateral loads or unsymmetrical vertical loads or where the frames themselves

are unsymmetrical. Sidesway also occurs in columns whose ends can move transversely when

they are loaded until buckling occurs.

Should frames with diagonal bracing or rigid shear walls be used, the columns will be

prevented from sidesway and provided with some rotational restraint at their ends. For these

situations, as illustrated below, the K -factors will fall somewhere between cases (a) and (d) of

Table C-C2.1. The LRFD Speciﬁcation C2 states that K = 1:0 should be used for columns in

frames with sidesway inhibited unless an analysis shows that a smaller value can be used.

K = 1:0 is often quite conservative, and an analysis made as described herein may result in

some savings.

(a) Diagonal bracing

(b) Shear wall

**Figure 1: Sidesway inhibited
**

Theoretical mathematical analyses may be used to determine effective lengths, but such

procedures are usually too lengthy and perhaps too difﬁcult for the average designer. The

usual procedure is to use Table C-C2.1, interpolating between the idealized values as the

designer feels appropriate. To make analysis and design easier, AISC provides a chart to

unless actually designed as a true friction-free pin.51 Design of Steel Structures Columns in Frames Page 2 calculate K . Ic and Ig are taken about axes perpendicular to the plane of buckling being considered. may be taken as “10” for practical designs. Fig.2 Alignment chart for effective length of columns in continuous frames. originally developed by Julian and Lawrence. The subscripts A and B refer to the joints at the two ends of the column section being considered. and Ig is the moment of inertia and Lg the unsupported length of a girder or other restraining member.1. One chart was developed for columns braced against sidesway and one for columns subject to sidesway. G is theoretically inﬁnity. . Smaller values may be used if justiﬁed by analysis. Ic is the moment of inertia and Lc the unsupported length of a column section. G may be taken as 1. but. If the column end is rigidly attached to a properly designed footing. They were developed from a slope-deﬂection analysis of the frames that includes the effects of column loads. present a practical method for estimating K -values. C-C2. These charts. For column ends supported by but not rigidly connected to a fooling or foundation. G is deﬁned as G= P P Ic=Lc P Ig =Lg in which indicates a summation of all members rigidly connected to that joint and lying on the plane in which buckling of the column is being considered.0.

First of all. but from a practical standpoint a value of 1.0 is recommended as no connections are perfectly rigid. B. and D). as where a column is connected to a footing with a frictionless hinge. In this case. The K -factor is then obtained from the charts. G is theoretically inﬁnite. For rigid connections of columns to footing G theoretically approaches zero. 2. C. B. it is recommended that G be made equal to 10 where such nonrigid supports are used. After the K -value is .51 Design of Steel Structures Design column B. 1. C) connected with beams (girders A.Columns in Frames Page 3 Column A 1. For pinned columns. Recognizing that such a connection is not frictionless. I =L I GA = I cA=L cA + IcB =LcB gA gA + gB =LgB =L + I GB = IIcB=L cB + I cC =LcC gC gC gD =LgD The Structural Stability Research Council (SSRC) makes several recommendations concerning the use of the alignment charts. There are two cases: (1) braced frames (sidesway inhibited) and (2) unbraced frames (sidesway uninhibited). Then the factor G (of the chart) should be calculated at the top and bottom of the column (local boundary conditions) using the formula: PI =L G = PI c=Lc g g where the summation is carried for all members connected to the point of interest. it is necessary to ﬁnd the length L and moment of inertia I of the columns and girders (beams) at each connection point. Girder B Column B Girder A Calculate GA Calculate GB Girder D Column C Girder C The ﬁgure shown above illustrate columns (A.

1.91 0.79 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 0. In other words.88 0. 114).27 0.89 0.65 0. Select the appropriate chart (sidesway inhibited or sidesway uninhibited).51 Design of Steel Structures Columns in Frames Page 4 determined.33 0. the elastic buckling controls.93 0.16 0. new effective lengths can be determined.22 0. Draw a straight line on the chart between the GA and GB values and read K where the line hits the center K scale.00 . Should the sizes change appreciably. inelastic buckling is the probable mode of failure. If the elastic buckling controls the failure.70 0. and so on.44 0.03 0. Pu=Ag ksi Fy = 36 ksi Fy = 50 ksi Pu=Ag ksi Fy = 36 ksi Fy = 50 ksi 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.58 0.92 0. Burns p.95 0. the column design repeated.53 0.67 0.30 0. s ) that can be found from the following table (suggested by Yura. In the case when the column behaves elastically.14 0.71 0.38 0.99 1. E2-3) become equal (Fcf = 0:39Fy ) when the slenderness parameter c = 1:5.58 0.82 0. Note that the AISC equations (E2-2) and (E2-3) 8 c 0:6582 Fy Fcr = :0:877F = 0:877 F E y 2 c for c 1:5 for c 1:5 (E2-2.45 0. Following shows a recommended design procedure for columns in frames.97 0.85 0. if the value Pu =Ag exceeds 0:39Fy . the G-value should be corrected by multiplying the elastic G-value by the stiffness reduction factor (SRF.90 0. 2.75 0.21 0.49 0.63 0. 3. the yielded region reduces the stiffness so that the K-factor should be corrected.97 0. for the case of inelastic buckling.09 0.99 1.95 0.98 0. otherwise. we can use the alignment chart directly to ﬁnd G-value.76 0.1. The alignment chart C-C2. However.52 0. Compute G at each end of the column and label the values GA and GB as desired.38 0.00 0.85 0. the each column can be redesigned.05 0.2 was made for stresses in the elastic region.

Kx=r x (strong-axis) : r x y 6. it is necessary to pick a new column.e. Step 2: Guess initial column size: Since Kx is unknown. Enter into the column table to get the approximate design strength. Step 4: Redesign. use KL = Ky Ly . Calculate GA and GB using the equation P I =L G = PI c=Lc : g g 3. 3-50. If inelastic buckling. i. Use the following approximate formula: Weight (new column) = Weight (old column) Load Capacity (old column) Repeat Steps 3 and 4 until satisfactory conditions are met. otherwise use G-values without modiﬁcation. Step 3: Calculate design strength. Determine Kx from the chart. or the formula. Pu Ag 0:39Fy then multiply G by the stiffness reduction factor found from the table. 5.51 Design of Steel Structures Columns in Frames Page 5 Design Procedure for Columns in Frames Step 1: Determine the factored design loads. Find the properties of all girders and columns. If the capacity is signiﬁcantly different from the design load. 2.1. 1. Step 5: Check the result using Table 3-36.. 4. . Determine the effective length KL: L KL = max Ky Ly (weak-axis).

- Topic10-SeismicDesignofSteelStructuresHandoutsUploaded byrk6482
- STRUCTURAL REVIEWER.pdfUploaded byLorry Ann
- 02. Παραδειγμα Λυγισμού.pdfUploaded bysamkegiwta
- The Lateral-Torsional Buckling of Unrestrained Steel Beams in FireUploaded byReaditReadit
- HSCUploaded byYahia Raad Al-Ani
- C Column Interaction Slender2Uploaded byanand_parchure
- ENDPLMC9Uploaded byjuliocra23
- ReportUploaded bySouvik Chakraborty
- Portal Frames - SteelconstructionUploaded byDushyantha Jayawardena
- Gen 7001Uploaded byMeshoo Zaky
- Simple Formulas for Laminated CylindersUploaded byVesa Räisänen
- SPECIAL REPORT_ New Method Assesses the Risk of Upheaval Buckling for Submerged Pipelines - Print This PageUploaded byazamshafiq
- Structural Reviewer 2Uploaded byZaela Efron
- ENDPLMC9Uploaded byPab Fer Man
- Manual for Columns and Struts ApparatusUploaded byramniwas123
- bookchapter_fka05Uploaded bydan20050505
- column extract easysteelstructuralpropertiesbook 1Uploaded byapi-358434924
- ICASS09 ProgrammeUploaded byRajish Arajish
- Engineering Calculation PipelineUploaded byShan Reev
- Masonry Design ExampleUploaded bykingson719
- MIEC Mobility EnUploaded bySoveasna Chan
- 2 Literature ReviewUploaded bysantkabir
- SPE-19923-MSUploaded byJuan Gonzalez
- ColumnsUploaded byShailendra Shambhu
- Buckling and wrinkling during strip conveying in processing lines.pdfUploaded byfahrgeruste3961
- r783Uploaded bymmancha
- PDHLibrary-History of Steel Beam-Column EquationsUploaded byPDHLibrary
- design of footings.pdfUploaded byJizelle Jumaquio
- ABS Buckling Requirements for OffshoreUploaded bycurvedbrain
- curved beam Design.docxUploaded byamarkiran vinayak

- Design of Steel StructuresUploaded bysusuzirmak
- SomUploaded bysusuzirmak
- Safe Kitabi r8Uploaded bysusuzirmak
- Civil Engineering FormulasUploaded bysusuzirmak
- Eos300d Cug EnUploaded bysusuzirmak
- Deprem ŞartnamesiUploaded bysusuzirmak
- yapiyonetimiUploaded bysusuzirmak
- DBYBHY-2007Uploaded bysusuzirmak
- yapiyonetimiUploaded bysusuzirmak